[HN Gopher] RoboCat - A Self-Improving Robotic Agent ___________________________________________________________________ RoboCat - A Self-Improving Robotic Agent Author : l1n Score : 105 points Date : 2023-06-20 16:07 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.deepmind.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.deepmind.com) | rhogar wrote: | Performance on so few examples is impressive, paired with | generalizability across broader tasks, and multiple embodiments + | environments (and from just visual goals rather than complex | verbal instructions) is quite a jump from where we saw Gato at | last spring. If representative, seems a strong step toward | meaningful autonomous skill acquisition/transference in realistic | settings. | aliljet wrote: | I really really really want to play with robotics at home, but | I've discovered it's super expensive to get things like robotic | arms at home. Are there robotics platforms that are DIY ready? I | really just want to teach a robotic arm to make my coffee in the | morning. And I'll apply my life's effort to achieving this only | if the cost of the robotics platform is stupid low. | | Yes. I know that's absurd. :) | jjk166 wrote: | Elephant robotics has arms starting around ~$500. I've had good | success with their myCobot280-pi. The reach and payload are a | bit limited but it's fine for playing around. | tomp wrote: | It's just normally expensive, not really really expensive. You | can get a robot arm for as cheap as 4k (comparable to 2 | MacBooks or 1 GPU) | juliangoldsmith wrote: | "...as cheap as..." doesn't really fit with an item that | costs almost the 2020 median salary in the US. | tomp wrote: | What about median _programmer_ salary? | flangola7 wrote: | Who said anything about programmers? | tomp wrote: | How are you gonna use a robot hand if you don't know how | to program? | nomel wrote: | The cheapest is to strap things onto a 3 axis 3d printer. They | can be had for < $200, which is much less than you could ever | build one for. | | Beyond that, it's DIY, with a set of strong servos and a few | budget microcontrollers/motor controllers, from Alibaba, | and...a 3d printer to manufacture the rest, for something like | an arm. | JimtheCoder wrote: | Was I the only one expecting a robotic cat? I am a little | disappointed... | ivankirigin wrote: | "We demonstrate shredded furniture RoboCat had never previously | seen" | itissid wrote: | What more would it take for google to succeed at something like: | | "robot can plant, water and harvest food that only poor laborers | from other countries did, replacing whole job categories in agro | business along with other things like making blue collar | immigration moot"? | tomp wrote: | Robots becoming 100x cheaper, or humans becoming 100x more | expensive. | red75prime wrote: | > Robots becoming 100x cheaper | | That is DeepMind succeeding on building robots that can build | robots. | loandbehold wrote: | Unitree sells robot similar to Boston Dynamics Spot for | $2700. If you add robotic gripper to it can do things like | picking strawberries cheaper than minimum wage worker. Say if | robot costs $3500 and minimum wage is $10/hour then robot | needs to only complete 43 8-hour shifts over it's lifetime to | displace human worker. | breakds wrote: | That is the basic version. The EDU version which opens more | API/interface to the user cost much more. Also training a | whole-body (quadruped + robotic arm with gripper) to do | something like picking strawberries remains challenging | today. | loandbehold wrote: | It's challenging but looks like Boston dynamics is able | to do that kind of tasks. For instance they have a build | in feature for spot with robotic hand that can open a | door by turning door handle. And apparently it works with | most doors. | startupsfail wrote: | * After observing 1000 human-controlled demonstrations, collected | in just hours, RoboCat could direct this new arm dexterously | enough to pick up gears successfully 86% of the time. * | | Interesting, but this doesn't sound like something that can be | useful. For practical industry applications, you need high | success rates. Assume you are running operations where | dropping/flips/damages to the items that a robot handles are | costly and not acceptable. | | Its only for a hobbyist pick-and-place, dropping a Lego block or | wasting some components is not a big deal. | jjk166 wrote: | > Assume you are running operations where | dropping/flips/damages to the items that a robot handles are | costly and not acceptable. | | Such operations are rare and in those cases you're probably not | picking them out of a bin to start with. For most items | dropping or flipping the object a few times is perfectly | acceptable, indeed that's probably how they got into their | current position to start with. | wilg wrote: | This is research! The point is this is possible now, and can be | improved upon. | traverseda wrote: | > Assume you are running operations where | dropping/flips/damages to the items that a robot handles are | costly and not acceptable. | | Alright, let's assume we're not too though, just for | completeness sake. | | Plenty of industrial applications where an 86% success rate is | fine, especially if you can try more than once. | nomel wrote: | Do you have any obvious examples in mind? | digdugdirk wrote: | Plenty of manufacturing environments that involve heavy | items. Even with a lift assist, they'll still need 2-3 | people to help lift or guide something to the next cell or | next place in the line. Lift assists are still expensive, | and if that could be replaced with a robotic arm and cut | out 2-3 employees at the same time? There's going to be a | big market for this. Certainly big enough to keep a company | afloat while they continue to refine the product and reduce | costs. | nomel wrote: | I would assume bridge cranes handles the majority of the | cases to replace human effort. It seems that | "successfully 86% of the time" and "heavy items" usually | means "destruction". Some secondary system to verify grip | would be required. | jjk166 wrote: | Fasteners (screws, rivets, etc) | | Metal and plastic Stock | | Castings and billets | | Clothing | | Bulk sacks of material | | Lumber | | Items to be recycled | | Most consumer goods after packaging | | Hand tools (wrenches, pliers, etc) | | Most food items | RajT88 wrote: | Next up: Teach it to be a fruit ninja. | robocat wrote: | I too am a self-improving agent - but I wouldn't call myself a | robot. | kendalf89 wrote: | Your user name says otherwise. | neilv wrote: | How much is a real cat is wired _a priori_ vs. learned? | | And is some of the learning from observing other cats? | itissid wrote: | I had a more general noobish version of it in my head how all | this plays out. | | Now that AI based task planning can learn from so few examples | and can do extremely general tasks like say the instruction: | | "Summarize my gmail twice a day at 7:00 AM and 5:00 PM filtering | spam and stuff I don't read" would spawn an agent with a plan to | do exactly what you want. And if it could not you could show it | once like "recording" a super smart "macro" only this time with | AI agents instead of Selenium. | | This would be an "inversion" of API way to do things. Pretty soon | people are writing tons of these "bots" and multiple cases land | in the some(supreme?) court over what is a bot and what is | personal property. | itissid wrote: | I mean I am not blind, there are plenty of no code platforms | that work on B2B space. But nothing in the B2C for general | purpose domain that do this in a privacy safe manner, at least | not one that will shake up the tech companies. | imachine1980_ wrote: | this will probably be b2b where you are the product, like | social media | bheadmaster wrote: | Wow, I'm really excited about new autonomous mechanical beasts! | What could possibly go wrong? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-20 23:00 UTC)