[HN Gopher] Clojure is a product design tool (2015) ___________________________________________________________________ Clojure is a product design tool (2015) Author : dustingetz Score : 71 points Date : 2023-06-22 20:16 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (precursorapp.com) (TXT) w3m dump (precursorapp.com) | croes wrote: | >[:p "Sentence with period after " [:a {:href "#"} "a link"] "."] | | Isn't that Hiccup and not Clojure Script? | ARandomerDude wrote: | Yes, but the Hiccup library works with both Clojure and | ClojureScript. | | Edit: I guess it's the Hiccups port that works for Cljs. Either | way hiccup notation is standard for both. | jetti wrote: | It is Clojurescript. It is just a vector that contains a | keyword, map and string. The Hiccup library would convert that | to HTML but at the end of the day, it is all Clojure(Script) | data structures. | nathants wrote: | reagent remains sota for frontend. | thih9 wrote: | Should we add (2015) to the submission title? | | The blog post has no date, but I found an earliest entry at | waybackmachine from march that year [1]. | | [1]: | https://web.archive.org/web/20150314172909/https://precursor... . | | Edit: I see the title has been updated, thanks! | jimbob45 wrote: | I sure wish we could move beyond HTML + JS into a unified Clojure | browser. HTML is what's holding the web back and there's no | excuse for JS to be the only browser scripting language at this | point. | zengid wrote: | I think that once the WASM-GC is standardized and shipped (and | perhaps once WASM can directly talk to the DOM), JavaScript | will lose some dominance. I think a lot of folks will stick | with it, personally, but I'm excited that more languages will | eventually feel browser-native. | giovannibonetti wrote: | Related: Penpot - The Open-Source design & prototyping platform | [1] is implemented in Clojure. | | [1] https://github.com/penpot/penpot | systems wrote: | Currently whenever I think of Clojure I remember this post | | https://www.reddit.com/r/Clojure/comments/a79aln/clojure_web... | | As far as I know the situation did not improve, I had high hopes | for Clojure, but i think it will eventually be as forgotten as | Groovy | 147 wrote: | I used to do Clojure professionally. I think the community's | disdain for frameworks really stunted Clojure's adoption. | | Currently, I'm learning Elixir and Phoenix. | Lyngbakr wrote: | > _How does someone who has never built a SPA before, let alone | ever build a web application in Clojure /S suppose to get | started?_ | | I think that _Clojure for the Brave and True_ [0] is a good | place to start for Clojure in general, while _Web Development | with Clojure: Build Large, Maintainable Web Applications | Interactively_ [1] covers the web app side of things. | | [0] https://www.braveclojure.com/ | | [1] https://pragprog.com/titles/dswdcloj3/web-development- | with-c... | shaunxcode wrote: | Aww yes the fiction of no friction: the funnel back to blub. | The way is no way. | trafnar wrote: | The haml/clojure comparison made me feel compelled to share the | Imba (https://imba.io/) equivalent. | | <p> "Sentence with a period after {<a href="#"> "a link"}." | | Working demo: https://scrimba.com/scrim/cW2QWgTd | cutler wrote: | Om is definitely not the place to start Clojure web development. | I'm not sure it's even maintained. Kit and Fulcro are full-stack | frameworks but if it's just SPA then re-frame is best option. | a_c wrote: | Before reading, I thought it is about Clojure helping designer to | collaborate with engineers and getting customer insight on how | the designed product is used. I was completely off. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-22 23:00 UTC)