[HN Gopher] What Alan Turing means to us ___________________________________________________________________ What Alan Turing means to us Author : headalgorithm Score : 52 points Date : 2023-06-23 18:23 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.turing.ac.uk) (TXT) w3m dump (www.turing.ac.uk) | 1091032014 wrote: | Some of these comments are absolutely wild. It should go without | saying that Alan Turing made an enormous impact on | computing...but it looks like it needs to be said. | | Nobody is trying to argue that Turing is the *only* important | figure in computing. The fact that he is celebrated doesn't | negate the impact of anybody else. | | Edited to add: For anyone who's doubting Turing's impact on | computing, or anyone who thinks that it's a modern phenomenon, | Kleene's 1971 textbook [1] makes it pretty clear that he had an | important impact. | | [1]: | https://archive.org/details/BubliothecaMathematicaStephenCol... | hkgjjgjfjfjfjf wrote: | [dead] | asdf6677 wrote: | [flagged] | alexb_ wrote: | Seriously? We're saying that dating a 19 year old makes you a | pedophile now? | daveoc64 wrote: | Maybe looking up the definition of pedophile would help you out | here. | | 19 is not pre-pubescent. | cubefox wrote: | There is an article by Schmidhuber about early theoretical | computer science to which Turing made contributions: | | https://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/turing-oversold.html | | He claims Turing's achievements are often oversold. Whether or | not that is true, the historical connections to Turing's | theoretical work are interesting. | [deleted] | istillwritecode wrote: | I like how he tried to disprove the Riemann Hypothesis. That's | actually how I first heard of Alan Turing, by seeing his paper on | the subject. https://www- | users.cse.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/turing.zeta.pdf | gargalatas wrote: | Although I believe that Claude Shannon [1] was the father of | computers and a much more important person than Alan Turing who | probably had a more "controversial" personality and thus he | became a "cinematic" figure. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claude_Shannon | 29athrowaway wrote: | Both were important, as well as many others, like Kurt Godel. | | Science is about growing the frontier of knowledge, akin to | making a cake larger, not dividing up a cake. | kristianc wrote: | Possibly - but this thread is about Turing, because of an | article about Alan Turing, which was posted by the Alan Turing | institute on the anniversary of the birthday of, you guessed | it, Alan Turing. | | Why the need to play one up? | gargalatas wrote: | Because Shannon's name has to be heard as well just for some | people who admire Steve Jobs as the biggest IT Idol in the | universe and have no idea who the hell is Dennis Ritchie. | Just saying.. | kristianc wrote: | Great, write a blog post on him then and post it here for | us all to read. | ayhanfuat wrote: | Neither being gay nor being forcibly castrated has anything to | do with personality [1]. [1] Link to Wikipedia personality page | gargalatas wrote: | "While there is no generally agreed-upon definition of | personality" | | Are you sure? | ayhanfuat wrote: | Yes, I am sure. Read the rest of the article. None of the | disagreement is about sexual orientation being part of | personality. | gargalatas wrote: | Well I am not, but I believe it can shape some aspects of | it. But since I find you so dogmatic about it how about | reading some papers which I really found very easily on | google: | https://www.psychologytoday.com/intl/blog/finding-new- | home/2... | ayhanfuat wrote: | You claimed it was Turing's personality which made him a | "cinematic figure". Now you are coming with irrelevant | articles about how sexual orientation is linked to | personal traits like openness, agreeableness and | conscientiousness. For your argument to follow, it should | be that one of these made him a cinematic figure, huh? | Animats wrote: | Until the 1980s or so, Turing wasn't known much outside | mathematics, and was considered a minor figure in computing. Von | Neumann was the big name in computer architecture, and Friedman | was the big name in cryptanalysis. | | Marian Rejewski in Poland invented the "bombe" for breaking early | German Enigma. Upgrades to the Enigma increased the work required | to crack the code substantially, and Turing was later involved in | developing a bigger model "bombe" that could be mass produced. | | The next upgrade on the German side, to the "Lorenz" machine | (like the Enigma, but with more rotors) forced a move to | electronics. Hence the "Colossus" machine, which was a key- | tester, like a Bitcoin miner, not a general purpose computer. | | Colossus was designed by Tommy Flowers, who got a raw deal out of | this. He worked for the General Post Office, which ran the UK | phone system, and had been working on electronic switching. | Because the Bletchly Park operation was classified long after the | war, he was unable to get funding to build a real computer after | the war. So he went back to phone switching. He lived until 1998, | so he got to see electronic computing happen without being a | major figure in it. | | "Filed under Equality, diversity and inclusion." | AnotherGoodName wrote: | The last part of your statement seems angry? | | The story of Turing is indeed particularly interesting for the | chemical castration and run ins with law over the big | government interference in his personal life. If we talk just | about people who have achieved things in computing the list is | huge but if we discuss people who gave sp much and had | government then take so much it's a different list isn't it? | But I don't see that as being a bad thing. | | So yes Turing is a great representative of an aspect of history | we should strive not to repeat. That's not a bad thing. | Animats wrote: | > The last part of your statement seems angry? | | That was from the original web page. | AnotherGoodName wrote: | Yeah but the point is that it's ok that we consider Turing | special from all the others who also contributed because | the other circumstances make the whole story more | interesting. | ffssffss wrote: | You changed the context pretty substantially by moving it | to the end of the piece and putting it in scare quotes | though. I also read it as intentionally pejorative. You | might want to edit the post if that's not what you meant. | pixel3234 wrote: | [flagged] | pixel3234 wrote: | [flagged] | katamarimambo wrote: | peak Hacker News | adrian_b wrote: | Turing had very important contributions to the design of | several early computers, culminating in the Ferranti Mark 1, | the first general-purpose electronic computer available | commercially (in 1951, ahead of UNIVAC). | | The most well-known contributions of Turing to the instruction | set architecture of Ferranti Mark 1 were a pair of instructions | that were added to other CPUs only many years later, i.e. the | equivalent of POPCNT (added by Intel only in 2009, in Nehalem) | and of RDRAND (added by Intel only in 2012, in Ivy Bridge). | | No other reasons are necessary to recognize his great merits. | morelisp wrote: | You seem jealous, maybe because his eponymous invention was | useful and yours is something everyone hates. | xyzzy3000 wrote: | I won't say that Turing is overrated, but I will say that | Flowers is very, very underrated. | | I find it astounding that Flowers wasn't even fully compensated | for the personal expense he took to buy the bits to make | Colossus. | | Bill Tutte also deserves a mention. | Animats wrote: | Flowers was one of the first people to push data around with | tubes. There was also an IBM group working on that before | WWII, and by 1943 they had the "Vacuum Tube Multiplier" | working. That eventually became the IBM 603 in 1946. | | I've seen one in an IBM historical display; it looks like a | very large hard-sided suitcase made of perforated black | metal. The 603 was a limited product built to answer the | question of whether electronics could be deployed to field | locations and serviced by IBM maintainers. Only 100 were | built. They solved the problems of making tubes work in the | field, so the IBM 604, the production version, was built in | 1948. This was the beginning of IBM's line of cost-effective | electronic business machines, ending with the IBM 650, which | was a full scale computer affordable by businesses. Knuth | learned to program on an IBM 650. | | Much of early computing was about getting memory that worked, | tubes that worked, capacitors that worked, connectors that | worked, and making the things maintainable. All that didn't | really come together until the IBM 1401, which was the first | mass-produced computer that Just Worked. | | It wasn't an architecture problem. The general ideas there | had been worked out in the 1930s by Eckert at Columbia | University, who came up with some insane mods to IBM | tabulating machines to use them for scientific purposes. This | kludge, in 1934, was the first automatic number-crunching | computing machine.[1] Eckert went on to become a founder of | UNIVAC. | | Understand, all this was being done in an era where a | reliable AM radio was hard. | | [1] http://www.columbia.edu/cu/computinghistory/switch.html | ly3xqhl8g9 wrote: | A realpolitik lesson for the scientists of the future: next | time you have the power, hold it, don't squander it on | politicians, begging for crumbs, grants and the decency of a | private life. Oppenheimer should have continued his quote | "now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds" with "bow to | me mortals, cause it is I that controls the machine" not | "here you go Mr. Truman, go nuts with the bombs". | | Also, Turing can never be overrated, beyond being the one who | pulled us into a new metaphysics of computability (alongside | Alonzo Church and others, sure), he will also be the one to | bring the 22nd century into a new metaphysics of | morphogenetic freedom [1] [2] [3]. Not sure about Flowers, | but Turing knew there were realms of computationality way | beyond their present tubes and levers. | | [1] 1952, Alan M. Turing, _The Chemical Basis of | Morphogenesis_ , https://www.dna.caltech.edu/courses/cs191/pa | perscs191/turing... | | [2] "The Collective Intelligence of Cells During | Morphogenesis with Dr. Michael Levin", | https://youtu.be/p4Fm7jLNrpg?t=125 | | [3] "Morphogenesis: Geometry, Physics, and Biology with Dr. | Lakshminarayanan Mahadevan", | https://youtu.be/b1-sEhB5h8Y?t=85 | KnobbleMcKnees wrote: | I learned about Turing at university in the 2000s, before his | personal history became a vogue subject. Specifically, I | learned about Turing machines and the halting problem, | alongside Von Neumann machines and such. | | It wasn't until later that I learned about Turing's suffering | due to his sexuality. | | so I am quite curious: why is Flowers underrated? What | contributions did he make to his fields similar to Turing's? | adrian_b wrote: | Most of his important work has been done during the War and | it was classified (being applied in electronic | cryptographic machines), so he was not allowed to brag | about it. | kristianc wrote: | Turing's work wasn't fully understood or appreciated until the | the 1980s specifically because many of the documents which | revealed the extent of his contributions were classified by the | UK government until then, and yes because of the social | attitudes of the time, particularly regarding his sexuality. | Without those two things he would have got far more credit than | he actually did. | | The declassification, and a thawing of social attitudes toward | LGBT people enabled Turing to be recognized as the figure he is | today. So yes, file it under equality, diversity and inclusion | all you want. | 908B64B197 wrote: | > Until the 1980s or so, Turing wasn't known much outside | mathematics, and was considered a minor figure in computing. | Von Neumann was the big name in computer architecture, and | Friedman was the big name in cryptanalysis. | | Big part of that is because a lot of what he did was kept | classified or not publicized too much by the British | government. They seem to have done a complete 180 on this | relatively recently (now that tech and SV are all over the | news) and seem to want to brand anything computing related with | his name. | | Am-I the only one that finds is odd how the British government | brags about Alan Turing after what they did to him? Having a | government research center named after him seems particularly | strange after what they had him endure. The state forced him to | undergo chemical castration because of his homosexuality. Same | state kept his achievements and contribution to the war effort | a secret up until after his death, so they could persecute a | war hero without the public knowing about it. | | Crazy to think he was convicted in 1952. Same year Elizabeth | became Queen and head of the British government. She could have | simply overturned his conviction, as British law allowed her to | do so. But she and the crown chose not to. | | The man saved women, men, children, of all races and | orientations from an horrible end. Had he not cracked the | enigma's cryptography, there would most likely remain nothing | today of the crown that persecuted him. Blown to dust by the | Luftwaffe. | | If only the British government had extended the same humanity | to Turing himself. | 908B64B197 wrote: | A lot of what Turing did was kept classified or not publicized | too much by the British government. They seem to have done a | complete 180 on this relatively recently (now that tech and SV | are all over the news) and seem to want to brand anything | computing related with his name. | | Am-I the only one that finds is odd how the British government | brags about Alan Turing after what they did to him? Having a | government research center named after him seems particularly | strange after what they had him endure. The state forced him to | undergo chemical castration because of his homosexuality. Same | state kept his achievements and contribution to the war effort a | secret up until after his death, so they could persecute a war | hero without the public knowing about it. | | Crazy to think he was convicted in 1952. Same year Elizabeth | became Queen and head of the British government. She could have | simply overturned his conviction, as British law allowed her to | do so. But she and the crown chose not to. | | The man saved women, men, children, of all races and orientations | from an horrible end. Had he not cracked the enigma's | cryptography, there would most likely remain nothing today of the | crown that persecuted him. Blown to dust by the Luftwaffe. | | If only the British government had extended the same humanity to | Turing himself. | _Wintermute wrote: | "The British Government" isn't some singular immortal person. I | imagine the people in charge of naming this academic institute | had nothing to do with his conviction or homosexuality laws in | the 1950s, they most likely weren't even alive then. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-24 23:00 UTC)