[HN Gopher] Caltech M4 Robot Flies, Rolls, Walks, and More ___________________________________________________________________ Caltech M4 Robot Flies, Rolls, Walks, and More Author : tromp Score : 132 points Date : 2023-06-27 16:19 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.caltech.edu) (TXT) w3m dump (www.caltech.edu) | syntaxing wrote: | The driving to walking transition is pretty darn cool. Using the | propellers to lift itself up is pretty smart. But overall, this | seems like an absolute reliability nightmare. | TX81Z wrote: | Also what if a twig gets in the wheel? Seems like it wouldn't | be able to fly then. | samstave wrote: | The good news is that when the battery dies, it has no moving | parts!, keeping it simple. | | EDIT: | | What would be really neat ; putting little inflatable pontoons | on those skids. | | That thing is awesome, however, with the hard plastic wheels, | and the way it scapes them back into forward wheels, I feel | like this is a dead-in-the-water-flaw. | | Imagine trying to scrape the wheels back into place on sand, or | any other terrain obsticals that will prevent the pulling the | wheels in. | | Instead, it should move the pivot joint and allow for the | wheels to be lifted up, gull-wing-style, then straightened and | then placed down like feet, lift the body, then drive.... | | That thing will die in water without pontoons (the wheels/tyres | maybe) -- and also not relying on scraping hard Big-Wheel stile | plastice tyres along whatever surface. | mc32 wrote: | It's probably a one use disposable solution when something | critical needs to be delivered somewhere, be it peaceful | (medicines) of bellicose (explosives) or anything in between. | WalterBright wrote: | Found another picture of it: | | https://static.wikia.nocookie.net/terminator/images/0/08/HK_... | bastardoperator wrote: | What is the practical application for robots like these? | Ozzie_osman wrote: | Unfortunately, usually killing people. | yazzku wrote: | It's usually more productive to ask who's paying for the | research than to try to answer that question directly. | | And the answer for these projects usually: the military | complex, possibly through one or two levels of indirection of | government/federal grants. | NoMoreNicksLeft wrote: | Kill all humans? | runamuck wrote: | Caltech developed the first triple-changer Transformer. More than | meets the eye! | barbariangrunge wrote: | Notice the cute, baby/pet like music for for tech that will be | used by militaries in the near future | jcims wrote: | At least they named it appropriately. | TX81Z wrote: | Came to post this comment and you beat me to it. I think it | deserves an overdub with some very intense industrial techno or | the Terminator theme. | civilitty wrote: | Black Mirror episode _Metalhead_ playing on a TV in the | background or picture-in-picture would be most fitting, I | think. | carimura wrote: | my exact first thought. black mirror to the soundtrack of a | photo app. | dj_mc_merlin wrote: | The main benefit I can think of for the military is the ability | to approach zones that have anti drone equipment via the | ground. Noise isn't really a concern since grenade drones fly | too high and kamikaze drones rely on speed and | unpredictability. Not sure how much better approach on wheels | would be than just flying low, either. | | The tradeoff is presumably higher cost and less reliability. | Additionally, less ability to carry mass than if it just flew. | | I can't imagine a way this would be too useful but obviously a | lack of imagination isn't proof.. | low_tech_punk wrote: | Today we are announcing two revolutionary products: | | A drone and a car. | | A drone and a car. | | A drone and a car. | | ... | antiviral wrote: | context for the uninitiated: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnrJzXM7a6o&t=130s | EGreg wrote: | Remember people. Robots don't kill people. Pe-- oh wait | djaychela wrote: | I noticed the terrified terrapin at 0:40 in the video as much as | anything else! Impressive idea though, being able to be multi- | modal. It'll be interesting to see how quickly that is copied and | made available to Joe Public. | SeanLuke wrote: | I don't see any walking. | octernion wrote: | clearly you have a strong grasp of the article's content | SeanLuke wrote: | > Joints on the wheel assemblies allow M4 to execute a | walking motion. In M4's current iteration, the walking motion | is mostly proof of concept. However, with anticipated | advances, future M4 generations could possess the ability to | effectively walk across broken terrain that a wheeled robot | would struggle with. | | Except that the provided demonstration isn't walking any more | than using a Segway is walking. | Mimmy wrote: | Agreed, the headline is a bit misleading. It can fly, roll on 4 | wheels, or roll on 2 wheels. | | The latter is interesting, but doesn't constitute "walking", | especially when the point of walking (as a preferred method of | locomotion) is to be able to step over obstacles or onto | platforms like stairs, which rolling on two wheels obviously | can't accomplish. | letmeflyhome wrote: | They should have had the legs extend up and down to prevent | scratching the wheels. | stronglikedan wrote: | Gotta save _something_ for the next iteration, to get the MVP | shipped! | ackbar03 wrote: | Like a machine gun | civilitty wrote: | I can't imagine they'll sell many units _without_ a machine | gun. | c22 wrote: | For landing I wonder if you could fold the wheels in first and | just fall back into driving stance. | christkv wrote: | Countdown until its made into a weapon. | JimtheCoder wrote: | I was thinking more in the direction of a toy for kids aged | 8-15. | scrps wrote: | Those better be some rich kids. 10 year old me would have | jump at the chance to tinker with a functional drone like | that. | JimtheCoder wrote: | It would have to be targeted to the kids with workaholic | parents who neglect to spend time with their children, and | thus need to spend big to demonstrate that they do, in | fact, love their offspring. | | The children in question would use the toy for 3 or 4 | weeks, get bored of it, and move on. | | We all know these people... | RobotToaster wrote: | Those things aren't mutually exclusive. | civilitty wrote: | Scale up the rotors, put a gun on it, and bam, fully autonomous | mobile artillery! | christkv wrote: | Add an explosive and it will pursue you. First flying and | when you try to hide in a bunker it transforms and rolls on | in after you. | stronglikedan wrote: | Scale the whole thing down to the size of a cockroach, and | put a poison tip dart on it! | scotty79 wrote: | I really hope development goes in this direction. Infantry | should be obsoleted as soon as possible. | barbariangrunge wrote: | Infantry soon being obsolete is a way of saying that | people will no longer be able defend themselves from | near-future weapons | kspacewalk2 wrote: | Except with drones of their own. | jl6 wrote: | The biggest/baddest drones will be available to the | richest/baddest people, just like all military tech. This | is not a great future. | varjag wrote: | Any defense over quantities has a statistical nature. You | only need to die once. | civilitty wrote: | That way all us civilian Zam Wesell wannabes can have a | go at it too! | melling wrote: | Drones are the future of warfare so you are a little late to | complain about drones being used for warfare. The race is well | under way. | | "...used by both Russia and Ukraine for surveillance and for | delivering bombs, goes for around US $2,000. You can get 55,000 | of them for the price of a single F-35" | | https://spectrum.ieee.org/amp/drone-warfare-ukraine-26602790... | jylam wrote: | "Drones are the future of warfare so you are a little late to | complain about drones being used for warfare. The race is | well under way" | | So it's not the future of warfare then by your own words, | that's the present situation. What are you complaining about | ? | fivre wrote: | https://thenewpress.com/books/theory-of-drone is a neat read | from the (not that much) earlier period where drone warfare | was asymmetric, trying to contextualize it in the broader | history of warfare. | jackallis wrote: | well, now all it needs is capability to swim and there goes | humanity. | kijin wrote: | Just make the body waterproof, and it will be able to move | around in water just fine using the drone propellers. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-27 23:00 UTC)