[HN Gopher] Why write? ___________________________________________________________________ Why write? Author : Pseudomanifold Score : 145 points Date : 2023-06-27 14:20 UTC (2 days ago) (HTM) web link (bastian.rieck.me) (TXT) w3m dump (bastian.rieck.me) | thinkpad13 wrote: | the blog is really clean I liek it | articsputnik wrote: | The font and the layout are amazing. I was wondering what font | it is. | GenericCanadian wrote: | I started writing when I was teaching newer programmers and I | found the amount I didn't know how to explain clearly was | staggering. Things I thought I knew so were actually kind of | blurry blobs in my mind. | | Recently I've been exploring Bevy and rust game development and | my learning has been so much better when I create docs for | myself: https://taintedcoders.com/ | mercurialsolo wrote: | Writing is like extending the context window for our brains | neural nets. Writing helps us also defragment our brains. We | write notes for ourselves to empty our brains of the thoughts at | times. | | PG's work back in the day on writing as a form of think is still | pretty relevant. http://www.paulgraham.com/words.html | jodrellblank wrote: | If writing is a form of thinking, and a picture is worth a | thousand words, does drawing (instead of writing) give a 1000x | boost to thinking in any way? | blechinger wrote: | It can certainly help pierce the shroud of qualia and aid | knowledge transfer. Other forms of communication like | diagrams, portrait sketches, and maps prove this out. | PartiallyTyped wrote: | Yes, but all you need is arrows; see Category theory ;) | __loam wrote: | I love that we can't have a discussion about brains without a | very poor computer science analogy. | Ensorceled wrote: | Two other reasons: | | 1. You learn what you don't know about the topic or things you | assumed you understood but really don't (a comment by @Swizec | identifies the Illusion of explanatory depth; TIL) | | 2. You learn what things you thought you "knew" that are either | contradictory or unfounded. | herval11 wrote: | [dead] | tony_cannistra wrote: | Good advice. Implicit here is that you really need _something | motivating_ to write/think about in order to follow this advice. | | That's probably obvious, but perhaps relevant for someone who | comes at this with an ambiguous desire to "write well" but | without clarity on "about what." | | Maybe a trivial point, but that's certainly the starting point of | any writer's journey: a topic? | number6 wrote: | An interesting topic or amalgamation point are weekly notes: | summarize your week. Most of us on HN work with interesting | problems and try to solve hard problems. | | Write about the stuff you learned in this week or what you | worked on. | | It can be brief and it should e fun. Not homework. | vinibrito wrote: | Agree, I'm doing that to write about my indie hacking story, | it's fun | number6 wrote: | Sounds interesting, where can I read it? | interroboink wrote: | A trite re-phrasing, which somehow captures some of the advice in | this article: | | Write "why" | | (that is: aim express the intuition behind something, rather than | gory details.) | nicbou wrote: | I found that writing forces me to look for a simpler, clearer | underlying idea. I sometimes have a bunch of disjointed thoughts | that I feel intensely about, and writing forces me to find a | theme to bind them together. | | Simple ideas sell, and finding them is a valuable skill. | ahalbert wrote: | I recently started writing reviews of each book I read. I found | it helps me retain the contents of the book and often people give | positive feedback about what they learned from my review. | dustingetz wrote: | how many hours do you invest in this per book and per month? | | I did this for a few months in 2017 but it was taking like 90 | minutes per chapter, and at full saturday morning 8am | attention! It's like doing math homework. And math homework is | not the most important thing I can spend the best 90 minutes of | my day on. | ahalbert wrote: | I don't know, but I wrote nearly 3000 words on the last book | review I did. I'd say I spend less time than 90 minutes per | chapter. I'm also sharing the reviews, which I find the most | rewarding part. | jnac wrote: | Is there any review(er) in particular you used as inspiration | here? Curious if you treat this more as personal notes, or a | public-facing review? | ahalbert wrote: | I do it on my college alum slack channel, but I recently | wrote one up that made it to the front page of HN: | | https://ahalbert.com/reviews/2023/06/04/the_culture_map.html | | I took some inspiration from the book review contests of | "Astral Codex Ten" | | https://astralcodexten.substack.com/p/your-book-review- | publi... | number6 wrote: | I do the same, since the Start of the year. I write personal | notes and if a book really gets to me I will write a public | review | [deleted] | Swizec wrote: | Illusion of explanatory depth. | | Until you write (or otherwise explain), you really don't know | whether you even know what you think you do. We humans tend to | over-estimate how well we understand something. We mentally paper | over holes in our knowledge and handwave away pesky little | details, until we try to explain the thing. Then you realize | _"Wait, those two ideas aren't connecting ..."_ | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illusion_of_explanatory_depth | | The other big reason, for me, is that without writing it soon | feels like my head is exploding. So many ideas racing around it | feels like I can't think straight. | AnimalMuppet wrote: | Feynman, in his freshman lectures, had some topic (I don't | remember what) that he wanted to use as a topic. But he | couldn't figure out how to explain it to freshmen. He said, | "That means we don't really understand it." | racktash wrote: | It's generally good advice. | | Although when I was younger I took it too much to heart and | became obsessed with having a verbal and written | understanding of everything when, sometimes, a deeper | understanding at a subconscious, more intuitive, level is | more useful. :) | nicbou wrote: | Then you write code. I thought I understood how German health | insurance works until I wrote a calculator for it. Suddenly I | had to consider far more cases. | chrisweekly wrote: | Yes. Taking it further, writing isn't just how you express your | thinking; the writing IS the thinking. | zvmaz wrote: | If I want to study something seriously, I formulate questions | about what I am learning and commit them to Anki cards for | review. It's anecdotal, but since I have been doing that, I am | more careful of the content of what I study (I ask to myself: | Did I understand that right? What does this part mean exactly? | Isn't there a contradiction there? Let's see...). | activatedgeek wrote: | [dead] | YChacker100 wrote: | Writing is good to explain an idea that is too hard to just have | in your head imo | slothtrop wrote: | Feynman similarly wrote that writing helps him think. Far and | away my #1 use for it. | eequah9L wrote: | I like how this applies to commit messages and patchset cover | letters as well. You write the whys and wherefores to both | explain to others what's going on, as well as to make sure you | understand yourself. For sure that increases your audience, | nobody cared about your fix before! And you need to narrate all | this -- a patch that fixes an issue should read a little bit like | a whodunnit. What the issue is, how to trigger it, what the | impact is, how the patch fixes it. | maxFlow wrote: | Thanks for mentioning this. I don't get to do much writing in | my time off work, since that time is devoted to (more) coding | to try and make my side project into a business. So what I do | to compensate is I make an effort and write all commit | messages, descriptions, code review comments and documentation | as if I were writing for an audience of top engineers auditing | my work. I find this approach makes me enjoy the process more, | be more deliberate about my actions, and how I communicate | them. Even a dull runbook can be beautifully written. | antirez wrote: | Writing is a set of techniques that can be learned to communicate | effectively. That said, reaching excellence requires some talent | other than the technique, but that's obvious, and common to every | other activity. It's worth remembering that teaching how to | communicate effectively is 2500 years old: it started in Sicily | with sophists, paid teachers of rhetoric in the ancient Greek | world. We kinda unlearned that writing is a learnable skill. | shubhamgrg04 wrote: | Writing is akin to debugging your own thought processes ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-06-29 23:01 UTC)