[HN Gopher] Dolphin mothers modify signature whistles in the pre...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Dolphin mothers modify signature whistles in the presence of their
       own calves
        
       Author : gumby
       Score  : 58 points
       Date   : 2023-06-30 19:39 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.pnas.org)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.pnas.org)
        
       | surfpel wrote:
       | Maybe we do it to babies to amplify the signals we're giving
       | them, since they can't interpret most information yet. That could
       | explain why we do it to dogs too, since we can hardly communicate
       | with them.
       | 
       | I've also noticed something similar when talking to people with
       | whom I hardly share any common language with. I use more obvious
       | or exaggerated facial expressions and vocal intonations to try to
       | convey meaning better.
        
         | lucideer wrote:
         | I know for dogs baby talk can be useful to separate your
         | communications, ensuring dogs only react when you're directly
         | addressing them, and not when you bring up keywords in idle
         | conversation on unrelated topics.
         | 
         | Not sure if this kind of compartmentalising is in any way
         | useful for human babies, probably not in any beneficial way I
         | guess.
        
       | fsckboy wrote:
       | long ago they taught us in linguistics class, deaf people signing
       | will also say (the equivalent of) "wa wa" to their kids for
       | "water".
       | 
       | they also told us that signed poetry "enjoys" a physical movement
       | sort of rhyming (which is also the oral origin of sonic rhyming
       | anyway, i suppose)
        
       | jamesgreenleaf wrote:
       | Can't wait until our technology allows us to talk to them.
       | 
       | Some dolphins have more than twice the number of neurons we do.
       | 
       | I bet they've got some interesting things to say.
        
         | nicolashahn wrote:
         | That'll be amazing, then we can give them jobs and make them
         | pay taxes.
        
           | prox wrote:
           | "For instance, on the planet Earth, man had always assumed
           | that he was more intelligent than dolphins because he had
           | achieved so much--the wheel, New York, wars and so on--whilst
           | all the dolphins had ever done was muck about in the water
           | having a good time. But conversely, the dolphins had always
           | believed that they were far more intelligent than man--for
           | precisely the same reasons." - Douglas Adams
        
           | nine_k wrote:
           | I remember that seals and dolphins were / are trained to
           | patrol navy bases and vessels, so they are effectively
           | employed by the state. I suppose their employer (e.g. DoD)
           | pays 100% of the taxes for them though.
        
             | engineer_22 wrote:
             | Let's wax philosophical on the tax implications of ancient
             | chattel slavery
             | 
             | :) Just kidding. Nice idea
        
         | nine_k wrote:
         | I can imagine (but too lazy to write an proper SF story) a
         | situation when scientists finally crack the code of cetacean
         | languages and achieve contact with various whales. They
         | encounter a sad, savage culture, while the whales inform them
         | that they used to have a great and sophisticated intellectual
         | culture, passed orally, but it was all destroyed during a
         | genocide a couple centuries before.
        
           | Hary06 wrote:
           | It would be a nice story.
        
             | gumby wrote:
             | A good one, but not a nice one.
        
               | doublerabbit wrote:
               | Depends how the ending works out.
               | 
               | A: Disney: "We all come to be the best of friends"
               | 
               | B: Quentin Tarantino: "Whales recruit the other sea-life.
               | Sentences all humans to death"
        
               | nine_k wrote:
               | Mr Tarantino, have you ever considered filming "Moby
               | Dick"?
               | 
               | (In my story, likely the larger whales would remain
               | scornful of humans, mostly avoiding contact, to say
               | nothing of cooperation.)
        
             | BuyMyBitcoins wrote:
             | A whale of a tale.
        
               | fsckboy wrote:
               | > _a proper SF story_
               | 
               | and in my Humboldt opinion, it would have appeal well
               | beyond the San Francisco area!
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | > Some dolphins have more than twice the number of neurons we
         | do.
         | 
         | Larger animals have more neurons because they have a larger
         | surface area (full of sensors, that need to terminate
         | someplace).
         | 
         | Some animals have noses with very large surface area (lots of
         | sensors). I suspect surface area of my Irish Wolfhound's nose
         | is something like the size of a football pitch.
         | 
         | I'd bet dolphins, seals, and the like have a lot more
         | sensors/cm2 of skin than humans, and probably other important
         | sensing as well that we don't need.
         | 
         | Unlike, say, octopus, I'd expect the higher order reasoning of
         | mammals to use structures somewhat similar to each other. I
         | doubt think dolphins' brains devote much of those extra neurons
         | to higher order reason (but this is speculation -- I'm no
         | cetaceanologist, nor neurologist for that matter).
         | 
         | > I bet they've got some interesting things to say.
         | 
         | Probably _much_ less than the average human, and that 's a
         | pretty low bar, even with a generous definition of
         | "interesting"
        
           | nine_k wrote:
           | Find out how dolphins sleep. They must have profound enough
           | differences in how they experience consciousness, however you
           | define it.
           | 
           | (This makes the prospects of talking to them all the more
           | interesting.)
        
           | engineer_22 wrote:
           | >I'd bet dolphins, seals, and the like have a lot more
           | sensors/cm2 of skin than humans, and probably other important
           | sensing as well that we don't need.
           | 
           | That's interesting. For what reason should we presume
           | sensors/cm2 is higher in aquatic than terrestrial species? Is
           | sensation of flow across the skin very important to them? I
           | was thinking about this myself and presumed the opposite,
           | that proprioception is important but feeling each portion of
           | the skin isnt so important, after all sensation across the
           | skin for a swimming animal would be unending, like tinnitus
           | for a man.
           | 
           | Good thinking and glad we could connect.
        
           | engineer_22 wrote:
           | > Probably much less than the average human, and that's a
           | pretty low bar, even with a generous definition of
           | "interesting"
           | 
           | In the open ocean, an environment so foreign to us, we might
           | not have a good sense for what /is/ interesting. Perhaps
           | tactics is interesting to dolphins. Perhaps social equity is
           | of chief importance, or they control technology related to
           | the moving of currents and surface waters, we won't know
           | unless we can place ourselves in their position, else its
           | speculation.
           | 
           | Again, quite interesting and glad you've shared your ideas,
           | hope we can connect.
        
         | engineer_22 wrote:
         | Fascinating idea.
         | 
         | That we could fantasize to communicate to extra-terrestrial
         | aliens but neglect communication with our intelligent earthly
         | neighbors... It seems to me like a lost opportunity.
        
         | djxfade wrote:
         | So long and thanks for all the fish
        
         | zgluck wrote:
         | But have they built dolpin-gpt, or even dolphin-tcp? (You could
         | argue they have something like dolpin-udp.)
        
       | myshpa wrote:
       | Want to protect dolphins, whales and other bycatch?
       | 
       | Don't eat fish.
       | 
       | https://www.seaspiracy.org/facts
       | 
       | 10,000+ dolphins are killed as bycatch off the coast of France
       | every year
       | 
       | Millions of tonnes of dead animals: the growing scandal of fish
       | waste
       | 
       | https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/may/09/millions...
       | 
       | Are fish far more intelligent than we realize?
       | 
       | https://www.vox.com/2014/8/4/5958871/fish-intelligence-smart...
       | 
       | A fish can sense another's fear, a study shows
       | 
       | https://apnews.com/article/empathy-zebrafish-oxytocin-origin...
       | 
       | Eating mackerel no longer sustainable, Good Fish Guide advises
       | 
       | https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/apr/05/mackerel...
       | 
       | 4 Ways The Fishing Industry is Destroying the Planet
       | 
       | https://animalequality.org/blog/2022/06/07/fishing-industry-...
        
         | darksaints wrote:
         | Nah, I'm good.
        
           | 9dev wrote:
           | Care to elaborate? You don't mind lots of probably very much
           | intelligent animals being killed by accident? Why?
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | thriftwy wrote:
             | A classic dialogue from Dog's Heart, regarding starving
             | German children, ensues.
        
             | darksaints wrote:
             | Global warming is heavily impacted by animal agriculture.
             | The vegan solution is to stop consuming animals. But why
             | can't we just stop eating bovines, which cause 80% of those
             | emissions? Why can't we switch to chicken? Why can't we eat
             | sardines? Why can't we modify industrial ag diets so they
             | produce less enteric fermentation? Why can't we have carbon
             | taxes so that the costs of remediation are priced into the
             | meat? If you ask the vegan, none of that works...We MuSt
             | ImEdIaTeLy CeAsE aLl HuMaN cOnSuMpTiOn Of AnImAlS!!!!!!!!!
             | 
             | It's the same here. It's not good enough to better regulate
             | fishing methods that minimize bycatch. It's not good enough
             | to tax and penalize bycatch. It's not good enough to shift
             | consumption to small pelagic forage fish that have
             | negligible bycatch. It's not good enough to shift to farmed
             | fish, or freshwater fish. Nothing is ever good enough...we
             | must immediately discard human diets and cultures that have
             | evolved over hundreds of thousands of years, and if we're
             | not willing to do that, we obviously hate dolphins. Can you
             | sense an eye-roll here?
             | 
             | So here is my elaboration: vegans start from the end goal
             | and then work backwards to find any reason to justify it,
             | no matter how disconnected from reality it is. And it is
             | always the same...the only way to solve every single
             | problem on the planet is to stop consuming animal products.
             | It lacks any form of intelligent thought or nuance, and it
             | is an extremely disingenuous form of argument, so it gets
             | the response it deserves: derision and dismissal. Come back
             | when you want to have an actual conversation.
        
               | myshpa wrote:
               | > If you ask the vegan, none of that works
               | 
               | Yes, because there are now 8 billion people, and nature
               | is on the brink of collapse.
               | 
               | > It's not good enough to tax and penalize bycatch
               | 
               | There are 5 mil. fishing boats, there is nobody who could
               | reliably monitor them. Doesn't work. See Seaspiracy movie
               | for an example.
               | 
               | > vegans start from the end goal
               | 
               | I became a vegan primarily due to environmental reasons.
               | It's a logical conclusion when studying the issues of
               | climate change, the anthropocene, deforestation and
               | biodiversity loss.
               | 
               | It's a complicated problem, and you would have to study
               | the issue yourself, not enough space here. You'd have to
               | read a lot of text that goes against your beliefs. Not
               | many people are able or ready to do that. Many rather
               | prefer to stay ignorant
               | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance).
               | 
               | Some links to get you started (more articles and papers @
               | https://www.plantbaseddata.org):
               | 
               | Which Diet Has the Least Environmental Impact on Our
               | Planet? A Systematic Review of Vegan, Vegetarian and
               | Omnivorous Diets
               | 
               | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/15/4110/htm
               | 
               | How Compatible Are Western European Dietary Patterns to
               | Climate Targets? Accounting for Uncertainty of Life Cycle
               | Assessments by Applying a Probabilistic Approach
               | 
               | https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/21/14449
               | 
               | Biodiversity conservation: The key is reducing meat
               | consumption
               | 
               | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26231772/
               | 
               | Livestock and climate change: what if the key actors in
               | climate change are... cows, pigs, and chickens?
               | 
               | https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Livestock-and-
               | climate-...
               | 
               | Without Changing Diets, Agriculture Alone Could Produce
               | Enough Emissions to Surpass 1.5degC of Global Warming
               | 
               | https://www.wri.org/insights/without-changing-diets-
               | agricult...
               | 
               | Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth
               | system exceeding planetary boundaries
               | 
               | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320356605_Agricu
               | ltu...
               | 
               | Avoiding meat and dairy is 'single biggest way' to reduce
               | your impact on Earth
               | 
               | https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/may/31/avoid
               | ing...
               | 
               | If the world adopted a plant-based diet we would reduce
               | global agricultural land use from 4 to 1 billion hectares
               | 
               | https://ourworldindata.org/land-use-diets
               | https://ourworldindata.org/land-use
               | https://ourworldindata.org/biodiversity
               | 
               | > Come back when you want to have an actual conversation
               | 
               | About how you want to keep eating meat even if it means
               | total destruction of the environment? Do you have studies
               | that show it's sustainable? Studies not paid for by meat
               | & dairy industry?
               | 
               | Inside big beef's climate messaging machine: confuse,
               | defend and downplay
               | 
               | https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/may/03/beef-
               | ind...
               | 
               | Why Right-Wingers Are So Afraid of Men Eating Vegetables
               | 
               | https://newrepublic.com/article/171781/meat-culture-war-
               | cric...
               | 
               | The meat industry is borrowing tactics from Big Oil to
               | obfuscate the truth about climate change
               | 
               | https://www.salon.com/2022/11/11/the-meat-industry-is-
               | borrow...
               | 
               | The Big Beef With the Meat Industry's Advertising Tactics
               | 
               | https://medium.com/@jodi_64782/the-big-beef-with-the-
               | meat-in...
               | 
               | If you have the facts, bring it on. Don't talk to me
               | about culture, though
               | (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7JE8j5Ncmw).
        
               | pharmakom wrote:
               | The problem I have with this argument for individuals is
               | that adopting these behaviours has negligible impact on
               | an individual scale. Put another way: if the world won't
               | change, why should I?
        
             | ddoolin wrote:
             | They should probably stop killing dolphins indiscriminately
             | in the name of catching fish.
        
         | thriftwy wrote:
         | Grain harvesting kills a lot of field mice, who are perhaps not
         | as smart as dolphins, but are still active, playful mammals.
         | 
         | They also were not raised and selected for that fate.
         | 
         | So?
        
           | myshpa wrote:
           | https://web.archive.org/web/20230204130304/https://www.econo.
           | ..
           | 
           | Nearly half of all grain is either burned as fuel or eaten by
           | animals
           | 
           | https://yourveganfallacyis.com/en/vegans-kill-animals-too
           | 
           | "Crop fields do indeed disrupt the habitats of wild animals,
           | and wild animals are also killed when harvesting plants.
           | However, this point makes the case for a plant-based diet and
           | not against it, since many more plants are required to
           | produce a measure of animal flesh for food (often as high as
           | 12:1) than are required to produce an equal measure of plants
           | for food (which is obviously 1:1). Because of this, a plant-
           | based diet causes less suffering and death than one that
           | includes animals."
           | 
           | > They also were not raised and selected for that fate.
           | 
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUmmN3lnUhY
        
           | nine_k wrote:
           | The difference is that we are not trying to learn how to talk
           | to mice, as to potential intellectual peers.
        
           | troyvit wrote:
           | So ...
           | 
           | 1. 5k acre grain fields are an artificial monoculture we
           | created that happens to be a great habitat for field mice.
           | This versus going to dolphins' natural habitat and killing
           | them while taking their food.
           | 
           | 2. Those 5k acre industrially processed grain fields are
           | actually a horrible way to farm and are reducing the
           | arability of the land much more quickly than any other method
           | we've come up with, so I view your comment as yet another
           | reason why we need to wipe out megafarming and replace it
           | with something more sustainable.
           | 
           | 3. And before you bring up "but we'll starve!"
           | 
           | a. We will anyway since we're using the land without
           | replenishing it, and
           | 
           | b. we could just stop wasting 40% of the food we produce to
           | make up any deficit that comes from sustainable or
           | regenerative farming, and
           | 
           | c. you're trying to draw some sort of equivalency between
           | dolphins and mice, so I just ask you to extend that
           | equivalency to humans and ask yourself why people are any
           | more important than the other 2.
        
             | bamfly wrote:
             | > b. we could just stop wasting 40% of the food we produce
             | to make up any deficit that comes from sustainable or
             | regenerative farming, and
             | 
             | Waste is high because food is cheap. Reducing waste will
             | look exactly the same as making food expensive.
        
           | SilasX wrote:
           | Mice were absolutely selected into the "Zerg rush/high loss
           | rate" niche.
        
         | mjfl wrote:
         | Do dolphins taste good?
        
           | pvaldes wrote:
           | Welcome to the flavor of mercury
        
           | andsoitis wrote:
           | While cooked dolphin meat has a flavor very similar to beef
           | liver, it is high in mercury, and may pose a health danger to
           | humans when consumed.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_mammals_as_food
        
           | sockaddr wrote:
           | Might taste like cow?
        
         | nine_k wrote:
         | I suppose there should be better ways to catch fish but not
         | dolphins; they are different enough.
         | 
         | Not that the ocean fishing industry isn't pretty screwed
         | currently, with overfishing, lost gear which is deadly for
         | marine life, etc. OTOH farmed fish exists (of what I regularly
         | see it's mostly salmon, trout, and tilapia).
        
           | thriftwy wrote:
           | A hundred upvotes.
           | 
           | Indeed we should be chopping people responsible for
           | regulating fishing industry alive and feeding their bodies to
           | dolphins; but why would that need to affect my feeding
           | habits?
           | 
           | Including parliaments of some countries wholesale: Japan,
           | perhaps?
           | 
           | "So you needed to pay fishermen to recycle their fishing
           | nets; but instead you choose, by action or inaction, to
           | charge them for recycling their fishing nets; which led to
           | fishermen dumping their nets in the ocean; so we will now
           | need to chop you into pieces and sell tickets, making your
           | family watch; otherwise, have a nice day while you still
           | can".
        
           | myshpa wrote:
           | Salmon and trout feed usually contains a combination of
           | fishmeal, fish oil, and plant-based ingredients. Fishmeal and
           | fish oil are typically derived from small marine fish like
           | anchovies, sardines, or menhaden.
           | 
           | IIRC it takes upto 5 kg of fishmeal to produce 1kg of farmed
           | fish.
           | 
           | Fish farming has also issues (water pollution,
           | eutrophication, diseases and parasites, feed dependency
           | contributing to overfishing and unsustainable fishing
           | practices, ...).
           | 
           | Antibiotic use in fish farms poses threat to humans, study
           | says https://www.aquaculturenorthamerica.com/antibiotic-use-
           | in-fi...
        
             | ge96 wrote:
             | there is the lab grown salmon, wildtype not sure how far
             | they are right now
        
           | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
           | As a Norwegian, I can tell you farmed fish is not as
           | ecologically friendly as one might believe. Here it's
           | generally farmed in fjords. Because factory farming and
           | parasites go hand in hand, parasites are a huge problem,
           | killings lots of fish. To combat this, they dump a bunch of
           | nasty chemicals into the water like organophosphates and
           | ivermectin. This is very harmful to aquatic life in the area.
           | The parasites bred in these conditions can also be dangerous
           | to aquatic ecosystems. And farmed salmon have a tendency to
           | escape their ponds and mess up wild fish populations.
           | 
           | May be less ecologically harmful than fishing, but it's not
           | exactly good either.
           | 
           | Edit: correction as per the helpful reply below.
        
             | belval wrote:
             | Not to counter your comment as I agree, but:
             | 
             | > nasty chemicals into the water like hydrogen peroxide
             | 
             | Hydrogen peroxide really isn't that problematic. It is
             | pretty unstable and reacts into oxygen and water. It kills
             | algae and bacteria in what is likely the cleanest way
             | possible.
        
               | mtlmtlmtlmtl wrote:
               | Fair enough. That was just the one I remembered off the
               | top of my head. Always happy to be corrected!
               | 
               | But they're using all sorts of different stuff. It's been
               | so bad at times they've basically been throwing spaghetti
               | at a wall to see if it sticks. Most of it there's not
               | even _any_ research to suggest the drugs they 're trying
               | are safe ecologically. But they try it anyway; it's a
               | woefully underregulated industry right now.
               | 
               | And there's the general problem that any indiscriminate
               | use of antibiotics(in the general definition of the word,
               | not the one restricted to bacteria) in a factory farming
               | context is bound to lead to the development of highly
               | resistant pathogens. That just follows from Darwin,
               | really.
        
         | OJFord wrote:
         | There's no way mackerel are unsustainable, unqualified.
         | 
         | Maybe not at present net-dragging prices, but I've been
         | mackereling a couple of times, with crab lines trailing off the
         | back (while we headed to a deeper spot for rod fishing),
         | absolute easiest fishing imaginable, it doesn't qualify as
         | sport. Some 'bycatch', but only other edibles like swordfish.
         | And of course fishing like that you can set them free if not
         | desired anyway.
         | 
         | Depending on season I can't really imagine it could be much
         | more expensive. Afaict the only reason there isn't more
         | commercial action from small boats is the competition from big
         | trawlers. If you eat mackerel at an independent restaurant in a
         | coastal town on the UK I think there's a good chance it's a
         | local catch by a local fisherman. They're just not going to get
         | the bigger contracts, nor pieces of them when they can be
         | filled in total by a bigger operation.
        
         | 11235813213455 wrote:
         | Don't have pets also (they eat 1/5th of worldwide fish
         | production)
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | CryptoBanker wrote:
           | Pretty sure it's 20% of all meat
        
           | ch4s3 wrote:
           | You can by fish free pet food.
           | 
           | I'm not sure why people are downvoting this, you can
           | literally by fish free cat food https://cats.com/fish-free-
           | cat-food.
        
       | [deleted]
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-06-30 23:00 UTC)