[HN Gopher] SpaceX rocket launches Euclid space telescope to map... ___________________________________________________________________ SpaceX rocket launches Euclid space telescope to map the 'dark universe' Author : gostsamo Score : 112 points Date : 2023-07-01 16:39 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.space.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.space.com) | nologic01 wrote: | Fingers crossed, if all goes well, we may have in a few years | remarkable new insights that we haven't had in fundamental | physics for quite some time. | | Vibes of the old COBE mission [1] that mapped for the first time | the microwave background radiation and revolutionized cosmology. | | https://science.nasa.gov/missions/cobe | dylan604 wrote: | I hate when I make the noob mistake of getting the timezone wrong | and showing up an hour late like what I did today | placesalt wrote: | I came across this the other day, it's pretty elegant and | basically solves the problem. Comes in handy when you have eg a | call with people in >2 timezones. | | https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html | Gehinnn wrote: | I can also recommend https://www.worldtimebuddy.com/ | | It's surprising how much ads all these tools show though. | dylan604 wrote: | yeah, sorry, i won't be visiting some website just to do | timezone conversions. i'll just double check my work next | time. to me, that's like the people that need to use GPS | navigation to go to the same location they've been to more | than once. | oefnak wrote: | Well, navigation also shows you traffic information which | is useful to choose the best path and to know at what | time you will arrive. | dylan604 wrote: | you can see the traffic with a quick glance at the map | app before leaving, but that's a pretty weak excuse | anyways. you and i both know that there are people that | need those turn by turn directions for reasons. | xeromal wrote: | It feels like you have a bit of superiority complex | against people who use GPS. What a weird thing to feel | smart about. | reaperducer wrote: | _yeah, sorry, i won 't be visiting some website just to | do timezone conversions._ | | I'm surprised to find that units doesn't handle this. | | I wonder if there's another CLI tool that does. | sam_goody wrote: | I use https://time.is (Choose any location.) | | Does other conversions and stuff, but much more elegant and | simpler than your link. | | Also good for setting your clock | veltas wrote: | Yep I use this for setting my mechanical watch every | morning, great website apart from the clock text is | relative to window width, so I can't zoom out if the window | is too short, I literally have to resize the window width | to see the time. | ben_w wrote: | I empathise. My parents and I did that once. | | Before all the clocks were self-updating, we missed the change | to summer time, which happened to be the day we'd arranged to | meet sister and grandmother at a restaurant for Easter lunch... | magicalhippo wrote: | Windows clock can show up to 3 timezones (system + two). I set | one to whatever event I want to track, that way I'm sure I | don't mess it up due to summer/winter time and whatnot. | monkpit wrote: | Did I miss something in this article about time zones? | dylan604 wrote: | I missed the launch because when I woke up, I read the launch | time quickly before being caffeinated, and did not do the | math correctly. So when I sat down to watch, I realized it | was an hour earlier. Nothing about the TFA, just sharing my | misfortune | tromp wrote: | What about Euclid makes it more suitable for its task of mapping | other galaxies than James Webb? | gostsamo wrote: | JW observes single stars and similar objects, while this one is | meant to take a wider view, aiming a big picture of the mass | distribution in the universe. In the article it is mentioned | that it is expected to map around a third of the sky in six | years. | emadehsan wrote: | Wish there were opportunities for non-European & non-American | people to work in these inspiring and endeavoring organizations | enkid wrote: | There's plenty of contractors working on space technology that | would hire someone without citizenship, I'm sure. | gduplessy wrote: | Strictly speaking for American contractors, I'm 99% sure that | is not true. If you have any contract with the government for | space stuff, all of your workers have to be citizens. I'm not | even sure they'd let a permanent resident work there because | of ITAR. | Sanzig wrote: | Permanent residents are considered US persons under ITAR, | so provided the company's activities are limited to | civilian space projects it isn't an issue. However, if the | company has defense contracts and requires employees to | obtain a security clearance, that requires citizenship. | abc_lisper wrote: | Lol. Not even. What about Musk. He is not born in US | georgeg23 wrote: | Elon supposedly got full U.S. citizenship after he made | connections with the CIA (Michael D. Griffin) although | the details aren't really known. | gostsamo wrote: | I think that the UN had a program for facilitating smaller | nations access to space. Currently, I'm finding only the outer | space office there though. | | Alternatively, many of the private space companies don't have | citizenship requirements. | xoa wrote: | > _Alternatively, many of the private space companies don 't | have citizenship requirements._ | | In America at least private companies are equally covered by | ITAR, so they do have citizenship/greencard requirements (or | need a variance that is nearly never granted in practice). | SpaceX can't just hire international talent as it wishes. I | assume there may be similar rules in some other countries, | though certainly not all. But it's not merely a matter of | private vs public fwiw. | the_third_wave wrote: | There are? Japan (JAXA), India (ISRO), China (CNSA) and Russia | (Roscosmos) all do science missions. | placesalt wrote: | Not generally known, I think, but Canada is technically part of | ESA. Not a full member, a 'Cooperating State', but there are | some benefits. Wiki sez "Canadian firms can bid for and receive | contracts to work on (ESA) programmes." | TheBigSalad wrote: | Your odds probably wouldn't be much better if you were an | American. | ragebol wrote: | India has ISRO | | Japan has JAXA | | The UAE have a space agency that even has a Mars mission | running currently. | | Same for China. | | There's more I'm forgetting, but space stuff is not limited to | Europe and the US. | darknavi wrote: | Very true, although I assume that most or all of those listed | have their own form of ITAR. Space (mostly defense) is | inherently siloed to country borders. | SonicScrub wrote: | I can't speak for the other nations, but Space technology | in Canada is controlled under the Controlled Goods Program | (CGP). A CGP clearance is obtainable as a Permanent | Resident. No citizenship required. Various Canadian | companies are suppliers/partners for space projects in the | US. For example the Artemis project is using the Canadian | company MDA as a key supplier (to manufacture space robotic | systems, including a newer version of the robotic arm | currently on the ISS). SpaceX also has a number of Canadian | suppliers, although their involvement is not advertised | very much. | edge17 wrote: | Isn't that most large capital intensive efforts? | | Also to be fair a lot of US defense and aero contractors | have manufacturing partnerships around the world. | colechristensen wrote: | > Isn't that most large capital intensive efforts? | | No. | | For example in university i was part of a satellite | design competition. We couldn't let Chinese nationals on | the team or we'd be breaking the law. There was a list of | approved countries a team member could have citizenship | from, if not we'd be guilty of violating export controls. | emadehsan wrote: | I'm part of the rest of the 4 billion. The ones you mentioned | only take their own citizens (probably except UAE). | starik36 wrote: | > except UAE | | I got bad news for you. Their spacecraft was built by | University of Colorado at Boulder. | TX81Z wrote: | Do we need an article about the trucking company that brought the | telescope to the launch pad as well? Surely all freight carriers | are due recognition? | | This headline makes it sounds like SpaceX is more that a freight | carrier here, undoubtedly for clicks. | | Being a freight carrier to space is indeed very cool, and | exciting, but they didn't make the telescope. | skybrian wrote: | Why write about launches? We could wait until it starts | gathering data because that's what really matters, right? | | Given that it's a rocket launch, crediting the company that did | the launch makes some sense. | the_third_wave wrote: | Why not write about launches? It is not every day ESA | launches a telescope to a Lagrange point after all. | explaininjs wrote: | Why write about when it starts collecting data? We could wait | until actual worldview changing research results surface | because that's what _really_ matters. | | The fact of the matter is worldview changing results will | likely not ever surface, just as they didn't from JWST. So | instead press departments pretend all the steps along the way | are important because it helps improve public sentiment for | the financing of these "moonshots" (which hardly even deserve | the name, we haven't accomplished anything remotely like | placing a man on the moon in decades). | krisoft wrote: | > The fact of the matter is worldview changing results will | likely not ever surface, just as they didn't from JWST. | | What do you count as worldview changing result? Who | promised you that the JWST will deliver such things? | | You are also quite quick to write off a mission with a 20 | year design lifespan. | explaininjs wrote: | The worldview changing result of Hubble was HUDF and the | revelation that it doesn't matter how deep you look it's | all the same damn spirals and shit. | | I wouldn't know what JWST's result would be, if I knew it | a priori it wouldn't be much of a result would it? But I | don't expect much. Happy to be pleasantly surprised. | krisoft wrote: | > The worldview changing result of Hubble was HUDF and | the revelation that it doesn't matter how deep you look | it's all the same damn spirals and shit. | | Interesting. What was your world view before this and how | did it changed? Did you for example believed earlier that | only the galaxies we have mapped so far do exist? | | > if I knew it a priori it wouldn't be much of a result | would it? | | Yet you are already certain it "did not materialise". | What was the latency between the photons of HUDF hitting | Hubble's mirror and your worldview being changed? | b59831 wrote: | Wow, some people just can't get over their musk hate. | mr_mitm wrote: | This is an important milestone for a science project that has | been 20 years in the making and might yield a few nobel prices. | I think it's worthy enough for HN. | justrealist wrote: | > This headline makes it sounds like SpaceX is more that a | freight carrier here, undoubtedly for clicks. | | How many commercial freight carriers do you think are options | right now? | | I would love for rocket launches to be as mundane as hiring a | trucker... but they aren't. | kitd wrote: | Here ya go: | | https://www.esa.int/Science_Exploration/Space_Science/Euclid... | | Here's the lead scientist who originated the idea: | | https://researchportal.port.ac.uk/en/persons/adam-amara | CynicusRex wrote: | You're just salty because it's related to Elon Muskuito. That's | okay, I am too. | darknavi wrote: | If does have some relevance: | | > Incidentally, Euclid was not supposed to launch aboard SpaceX | at all. As late as February 2022, the mission was manifested | upon an Arianespace Soyuz (provided by Russia) for a March 2023 | launch in French Guiana. Russia's unsanctioned invasion of | Ukraine forced a stop to most such space collaborations aside | from the International Space Station, pushing Euclid's team to | look for another ride to space. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-07-01 23:00 UTC)