[HN Gopher] 2,200 forgotten vintage computers from a barn in Mas... ___________________________________________________________________ 2,200 forgotten vintage computers from a barn in Massachusetts Author : zhte415 Score : 135 points Date : 2023-06-28 14:58 UTC (4 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.vice.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.vice.com) | frozenport wrote: | In context Mintel would launch at the same time with much more | success: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minitel | MarkusWandel wrote: | The interesting NABU was IMHO not these, but the NABU 1200. An | early 8086 Unix machine. I got one at a garage sale in 1993 or | so. It worked, and the Microsoft Xenix 1.0 was a direct port of | V7 Unix from Bell Labs and quite educational in this respect | precisely because it was still simple and understandable, | compared to to the work station OS's of the time. | | Proprietary no-source OS's were still common then, so binary | patching the kernel to put in a different hard disk parameter | table (to use a luxuriously large 20MB drive in place of the | ST412 the machine came with - precious! Must not mess with the | irreplaceable original OS image) was undaunting, especially with | a .h file handy that gave the structure. Compiling "elvis" to get | vi in the absolutely stripped down Minix mode, that used 63Kbytes | of the maximum 64K of code space that executables could use... | fun times. Of course back then you still had a hope of compiling | current C with ancient pre-ANSI K&R C compiler. Most stuff that I | ran on the machine didn't need much porting. | randombits0 wrote: | What a sad, desperate post, trying to steal the lime light of a | long forgotten Z80 1980s box. We Nabuers enjoy our new/old | vintage computer! It's just a bit of neoretro fun and here you | have to squeeze what little joy we have into your glass. | Shameful. | | /s | samstave wrote: | You know what I would truly love out of an AI/LLM == | | A crawler across everything tech which takes a comment such as | yours, and then parses out all the | systems/people/code/languages/companies/timeframe and builds a | really good history of computing. | | That would be absolutely beautiful. | | AI Keeping its own evolutionary tree documented... and turned | into a teaching platform. | htk wrote: | A brand new keyboard from the early 80's. Curious to type on | that. | EvanAnderson wrote: | Leo Binkowski (developer for NABU and quoted in the article) gave | a nice talk at VCF East earlier this year: | https://youtube.com/watch?v=IhPsNQBCKfM | [deleted] | ChrisArchitect wrote: | Isn't this post from 4 days ago? Reinvited when it had a bunch of | upvotes already? | TacticalCoder wrote: | That's weird, I see the same (and I read that thread a few days | ago). I see the top comment as from 4 hours ago but then in the | user's history it's from 4 days ago. | | I'm confused. | EvanAnderson wrote: | I've seen this with other posts in the past. I'm glad | somebody else is acknowledging it. I was having a major | "Mandela effect" feeling when I noticed it. | detaro wrote: | the HN mods "re-upped" this submission, which works by | pretending that it was submitted later (and hence the ranking | calculation treats it as new etc). It also fudges how the | timestamps appear on the page. (presumably because otherwise | people would be confused why a post from an hour ago has | comments made 4 days ago) | | On the user pages this doesn't happen and it shows the | original time. | TacticalCoder wrote: | > It also fudges how the timestamps appear on the page. | | Oh that's interesting, thanks for the explanation! (and a | bit weird too but not in a bad way) | kristopolous wrote: | It's a large quantity but it looks like the going price is about | $120. I presume these were going out untested. So really, $60 | sounds a bit cheap but really not unusual. The 2,000+ of them is | the real crazy part. | | Sadly, just because something is 40 years old doesn't mean it | will fetch a high price. Especially microcomputers. There's a | bunch of rare and also cheap ones. | | Rare because almost nobody wants them and cheap for the same | reason. | | For an equivalent today, think about some low end random model | android phone from the early 2010s. Both cheap and rare | jeremyjh wrote: | I mean you can write Z80 assembler on one. Who cares if it was | popular in the 80s? | ChickeNES wrote: | I think I was one of the last to score it at $100 a few days | ago. It's been relisted at $120 and $180 and is now gone again. | I assume this article will result in the full stock being sold | shortly | jsnell wrote: | The article says they were tested. | | > Plus, they were essentially new. "It's new old stock, but it | is tested," he says at the beginning of the clip. "I think the | seller actually peeled the original tape off, tested it, and | then taped it back up again." | kristopolous wrote: | Oh I didn't read closely. In that case, good deal | qup wrote: | When I see things I like this, I immediately want them. But then | I realize I would probably boot it a few times and put it to | rest. I have many computing devices I don't use. | | If we were to gift this in the most optimum way for a person who | would actually put this machine into service...who would that be? | What criteria make this the correct solution? | 1970-01-01 wrote: | Great story! Vintage computers will always hold some value, | however a vintage network resurrection is priceless. | em-bee wrote: | i am most fascinated by the bidirectional cable connection that | his device was using. it shows that with more investment we could | have had something like the internet 15-20 years earlier. | | so the primary roadblock for development at the time was cost, | not capacity. | | i believe today most development happens at max capacity, because | cost is no longer much of an issue. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-07-02 23:00 UTC)