[HN Gopher] How to foster shoshin
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       How to foster shoshin
        
       Author : andsoitis
       Score  : 76 points
       Date   : 2023-07-05 14:55 UTC (8 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (psyche.co)
 (TXT) w3m dump (psyche.co)
        
       | wnolens wrote:
       | I think there's an underappreciated reason for trying to
       | cultivate this kind of mind.
       | 
       | > With eyes and mind wide open, it's so much easier to enjoy the
       | wonders of the world
       | 
       | Never occurred to me before but by constantly learning new things
       | (instrument, rock climbing, history of Iran, sewing..) I've been
       | cultivating a mindset of gratitude for the world and appreciation
       | of others' abilities. I feel it has helped bring my brain slowly
       | back into balance from being quite depressed. Focusing on
       | learning something new was a way out.
        
       | suction wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | debacle wrote:
       | Are people "intellectually humble" or just more humble in
       | general?
       | 
       | Many intellectual people use their intelligence and authority as
       | a coping mechanism for poor social skills or low self esteem. As
       | a manager + systems architect, I've worked with a lot of people
       | who almost have PTSD from dealing with the petty tyrants in our
       | industry, and I've been told that academia is much worse.
       | 
       | If you want to foster shoshin, just listen more than you speak.
       | I've got two decades of experience and my third year interns
       | teach me cool things all the time.
        
         | [deleted]
        
       | astrange wrote:
       | This article title is what you call Orientalism. Chu Xin  is not
       | a mystical ancient philosophy term unknown to the West. It's
       | "beginner's mindset" or "openness to new concepts".
       | 
       | Actually, knowing "openness" is more important because knowing
       | what Big 5 personality traits are protects you from believing in
       | MBTI.
        
       | ulfbert_inc wrote:
       | >His German compatriots referred to his 'delirious ravings' while
       | experts in the United States accused him of peddling
       | pseudoscience.
       | 
       | Many such cases!
        
         | Archelaos wrote:
         | This narrative is way too simple. The US-American Frank Bursley
         | Taylor proposed something like condinental drift even before
         | Wegener. One of Wegeners early opponents, Hans Cloos,
         | nevertheless held him in high regard. Despite his dissent from
         | the mainstream, he received a professorship in Graz.
         | 
         | The opposition against him at the time was well justified. His
         | theory lacked a convincing explanation about the driving force
         | of plate tectonics, which he identified as tidal and
         | centrifugal forces in his early theory. (The extent to which
         | these forces contribute to plate tectonics is still disputed
         | today.) It was only later (after he had drawn the harsh
         | criticism quoted in the article) that he considered convection
         | currents as the main driving force.
        
       | ChrisMarshallNY wrote:
       | A good way to get this mindset is to try doing things you don't
       | know how to do.
       | 
       | I write a bit about that, here:
       | https://littlegreenviper.com/miscellany/thats-not-what-ships...
       | 
       | Reminds me a bit of the old Stephen J. Gould quote:
       | 
       |  _"The most erroneous stories are those we think we know best
       | -and therefore never scrutinize or question."_
        
       | giantbanana wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | ftxbro wrote:
       | this is such a hacker news article. your autistic childishness is
       | actually a superpower with its own japanese word.
        
         | gjvc wrote:
         | * * *
        
       | kazinator wrote:
       | Shoshin and shoshinsha (beginner) are everyday words in Japanese,
       | not special Zen terms.
        
         | sctb wrote:
         | And this article is mostly talking about everyday concepts like
         | learning. But there's no denying that the idea of beginner's
         | mind is used within Zen in a special sense. From Dogen's essay
         | _On the Endeavour of the Way_ :
         | 
         | > Because practice within realization occurs at the moment of
         | practice, the practice of beginner's mind is itself the entire
         | original realization.
        
         | hooverd wrote:
         | Does Japan have articles like "Top 10 English concepts to live
         | by" where they're all just regular words?
        
         | pzel_ wrote:
         | Yes, in the same way as "evangelist" and "novice" are everyday
         | words in English. This does not invalidate their original
         | religious meaning. Daisetz Suzuki I'm sure was quite aware of
         | both the everyday usage and the Buddhist origins.
        
           | sctb wrote:
           | Nitpick, but this article quotes Shunryu Suzuki--the other
           | Suzuki--not D.T.
        
             | pzel_ wrote:
             | Beginner's mistake!
        
           | kazinator wrote:
           | "Novice" doesn't originally have religious roots; in the
           | story of its etymology, it got sidetracked into religion.
           | 
           | Quite likely because the only dudes who knew Latin in the
           | Middle Ages were in monasteries, and so they applied Latin
           | words they learned to their circumstances. "Hey, it says here
           | that when Romans brought in a new imported, inexperienced
           | slave, they called them _novicus_. Let 's use that for our
           | newcomers! After all, we make them do chores, like slaves,
           | LOLZ!"
        
             | pzel_ wrote:
             | I'm going off of this entry:
             | 
             | https://www.etymonline.com/word/novice
             | 
             | Sure the root word might be Latin, (and so is a majority of
             | European vocabulary), but the specific usage of "novice"
             | meaning "newbie" _in English_ , comes from the monastic
             | orders, via French.
             | 
             | Monastic orders, which, in fact, did not "do stuff, like
             | slaves, LOLZ", but were instrumental in preserving (or
             | rediscovering) knowledge and technology from the imperial
             | era.
        
         | thrdbndndn wrote:
         | So are lots of other words. Really hate this trend.
        
           | pzel_ wrote:
           | Are you referring to the trend of desacralization or
           | resacralization of religious terms?
           | 
           | This is the dictionary definition of shoshin from
           | kotobank.jp:
           | 
           | > 2 ([shiyohotsushin(Chu Fa Xin )] noLue ) Chu meteWu riwoQiu
           | meruXin woQi kosukoto. Fo Dao nihaitsutabakarinokoto. mata,
           | sonoRen . [Fa Hua Yi Shu (7CQian )]  *Zheng Fa Yan Zang Sui
           | Wen Ji (1235-38)Yi [Huo haChu Xin Wei Ru (minihu)noRen Yi De
           | (kokorou)
        
       | haswell wrote:
       | > _A final, more pleasurable step you can take to increase your
       | intellectual humility comes in the form of deliberately invoking
       | in oneself the emotion of awe. Several studies have shown that
       | awe quietens the ego and prompts epistemological openness - that
       | is, a greater willingness to look at things differently and to
       | recognise the gaps in one's knowledge._
       | 
       | If you cannot remember the last time you experienced awe, I
       | highly recommend seeking it out. It may be important for
       | fostering intellectual humility, but it seems just as important
       | for fostering a better outlook/framing on life in general and
       | brings with it a sense of wellbeing.
       | 
       | After burning out and starting a sabbatical last year, I went on
       | a road trip that provided many moments of awe: a snowy mountain
       | sunrise in the Rockies, the Milky Way in one of the darkest spots
       | in Utah, long hikes through the redwoods, etc.
       | 
       | What struck me was that I had forgotten what these feelings felt
       | like, and that I hadn't felt them since I was a kid.
       | 
       | Glimpsing them reminded me how important they are, and I'm
       | convinced that sustainability in future work endeavors (and life
       | in general) involves an appropriate dose of awe and wonder on an
       | ongoing basis.
       | 
       | Road trips into the desert aren't necessary to experience this
       | either (for me anyway) - just a very effective way to guarantee
       | the experience (again, for me). But I can find it by pondering
       | the bigger questions about life and the sheer improbability of
       | our existence. Dedicating some regular time to this kind of
       | reflection has been beneficial.
       | 
       | And I do find that I'm more open to possibilities. But that seems
       | like just one of the outcomes from the "nourishment" of these
       | experiences.
        
         | mikrl wrote:
         | I took a walk last night to look at the sunset, and felt a
         | strong feeling of both awe and melancholy as I did so.
         | 
         | Is it really so rare to be awed by natural beauty, or just
         | humbled by where one is in life relative to oneself in the
         | past, and others (both more and less fortunate) in the present?
         | 
         | When I think of friends made, friends not present, and all of
         | the life trajectories that I can keep track of, I feel it's all
         | just a long and strange trip, man.
        
         | vmoore wrote:
         | > If you cannot remember the last time you experienced awe, I
         | highly recommend seeking it out
         | 
         | The older I get, the more I appreciate the sheer vastness of
         | space and the amount of stuff in it, and contrasting the size
         | of it to our little pale blue dot. The Nihilists will say our
         | time here is all meaningless and we'll eventually be swallowed
         | by the Sun if we don't go star faring. We better get our act
         | together in terms of space travel before it's too late.
         | 
         | We need to think long-term and occupy Mars, then taken to its
         | logical conclusion: Von Neumann machines which populate our
         | galaxy. That's if we're not sucked into the black hole in the
         | center of our galaxy. But at least we gave it a shot. We
         | outsmarted the natural cycles of the solar system and
         | transcended it, possibly building a Dyson sphere around the Sun
         | and then hopped to other star systems and built Dyson spheres
         | around them.
         | 
         | When I was young, I knew the Universe was very big. But over
         | the years, helped by various documentaries, YouTube videos, and
         | various psychedelics, I surmised we are destined for something
         | much more than mere Earth. Our spirit cries for space travel,
         | yet at the same time it's hampered by the rape of the planet
         | and late-stage capitalism and 'infinite growth' at all costs.
        
           | paulryanrogers wrote:
           | Going to the stars at all costs is similarly destructive.
           | 
           | This galaxy won't last forever. Even this expanse may
           | collapse and be reborn. If matter is eternal then life will
           | probably arise again. So relax, enjoy the ride, and do what
           | you can to leave the place better than you found it.
        
         | tremon wrote:
         | _If you cannot remember the last time you experienced awe_
         | 
         | I experienced it earlier today, browsing the demo's linked from
         | this story: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36597460
        
       | kristopolous wrote:
       | This can be said way more briefly:
       | 
       | "what would teenage you be like here"
       | 
       | Follow those instincts (presuming you weren't a slacker) and
       | that's it.
        
       | photochemsyn wrote:
       | This author's example does not inspire confidence in the rest of
       | the article:
       | 
       | > "Take the matter of genetically modified (GM) foods, which are
       | overwhelmingly considered to be safe based on current scientific
       | knowledge. Research has shown that people who hold the strongest
       | anti-GM views, believing that they are harmful, are the most
       | inclined to overestimate their relevant knowledge."
       | 
       | If I insert the genes coding the enzymatic pathway for production
       | of a virulent mammalian toxin into a maize plant, that's going to
       | be very unsafe, particularly if pollen from that plant can carry
       | those genes into someone's non-GMO cornfield.
       | 
       | On the other hand, if I make a minor specific edit to the
       | regulatory region upstream from a gene that controls the onset of
       | flowering in a tomato plant, with the idea of producing an early-
       | flowering varietal for northern climates, that's entirely safe
       | (assuming no other accidental changes were made).
       | 
       | Claiming that GMO foods are 'universally acknowledged to be safe'
       | is like claiming metallurgy is universally acknowledged to be
       | safe. It all depends on the specific application and how it's
       | done, e.g. heavy metal pollution is a major issue in many places
       | because of lack of pollution controls.
       | 
       | Placing blind faith in governmental and corporate scientists
       | because they wear the white coats of authority is not that
       | different from blind obedience to the priestly caste of prior
       | centuries. If they can't provide explanations that the educated
       | layperson can understand, and if they can't respond to detailed
       | criticisms of their claims, then they should not be trusted.
        
         | zackmorris wrote:
         | I can offer an analogy. Growing up in the northwestern US, I've
         | seen firsthand how 95% of the forest in the lower 48 was
         | harvested for timber, leaving only small pockets of primordial
         | forest. That and global warming delivered us the runaway fire
         | seasons we have today where summer is synonymous with poor air
         | quality, poor water quality, erosion, loss of habitat, etc etc
         | etc.
         | 
         | There are countless propaganda billboards here that say stuff
         | like "thin the threat". The timber industry really wants to get
         | back into wilderness areas and places designated roadless by
         | the Clinton administration back in the 90s.
         | 
         | But what I think most of us want is for the timber industry to
         | admit their guilt. Basically that would look something like a
         | bankruptcy and a multi-billion dollar apology in the form of
         | trusts and endowments to leave forests alone and invest in
         | stuff like tree farms and hemp. Which will never come.
         | 
         | I've yet to see a major apology from GMO companies for the ways
         | they've corrupted staple crops like wheat. We're eating
         | processed whole grains today that were meant for animal feed
         | (cows have 4 stomachs that can handle it, we can't), stuff like
         | oatmeal loaded with glyphosate, and it's attacking our gut
         | lining and causing autoimmune diseases at a scale that the
         | previous generation can't understand.
         | 
         | So until there are reparations for the damage done, we simple
         | can't trust those companies or the government agencies they've
         | captured, or the politicians they've bought, or the court
         | justices they've installed. The problem goes so deep in our
         | political system that people can't even see it anymore. That's
         | why the wealthy owners of those companies keep us divided over
         | the merits of various remedies, so we don't wake up to the
         | facts of how we're being manipulated into giving up our health
         | to shave a few pennies off the price to increase their profits.
         | 
         | Edit: I'm struggling to find evidence for the effects of whole
         | grain husks on the gut lining. But basically, the anti-pest
         | compounds in grain husks make it past stomach acid, and when
         | the villi (papillae was maybe the wrong term) in the lining of
         | the small intestine try to eat the partially-digested proteins,
         | it damages or kills them. The cycle of damage and repair
         | continues through life until middle age, when the cells start
         | losing their healing ability. Then one acquires sensitivity to
         | wheat and other grains like I did, which I originally thought
         | was sensitivity to legumes and nightshades:
         | 
         | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2020.51731...
         | 
         | Then the villi become sparse or die, leaving the person unable
         | to easily absorb vitamins and minerals, sending them into
         | chronic starvation mode and obesity:
         | 
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intestinal_villus#Villous_atro...
         | 
         | GMOs exacerbate this by increasing the percentages of anti-pest
         | compounds in husks. I try to avoid whole grains now after a
         | lifetime of seeking them. If I must eat them, I try to stick to
         | organic.
        
           | wakamoleguy wrote:
           | It's possible that you are struggling to find evidence
           | because the evidence points in the other direction. For
           | example, from the review article you linked:
           | 
           | "Based on all available scientific knowledge, wheat
           | consumption is safe and healthy for the vast majority of
           | people. There is no scientific evidence to support that the
           | general population would benefit from a wheat-free diet."
           | 
           | Step 1 of fostering "shoshin" was to explain a theory or idea
           | to someone else. Now step 2 is to stay aware of confirmation
           | bias.
        
         | renewiltord wrote:
         | > _On the other hand, if I make a minor specific edit to the
         | regulatory region upstream from a gene that controls the onset
         | of flowering in a tomato plant, with the idea of producing an
         | early-flowering varietal for northern climates, that 's
         | entirely safe (assuming no other accidental changes were
         | made)._
         | 
         | No, this is not true if someone is pointing a nuclear missile
         | at NYC and will fire it if you "make a minor specific edit to
         | the regulatory region upstream from a gene that controls the
         | onset of flowering in a tomato plant". It's important that you
         | clarify the point by also adding in the caveat excluding this
         | case. I am also told that what you propose is unsafe in the
         | event that there is a terrorist with a bomb who will explode in
         | Penn Station if you make that edit.
         | 
         | It is important that we be precise with safety language since
         | otherwise we may mislead people about the state of the field.
         | Please be more responsible.
        
           | ntumlin wrote:
           | This is nonsense, it's obvious what type of safety OP meant.
           | I have no idea what could be irresponsible about not
           | including contrived, ridiculous scenarios.
           | 
           | It's like saying he also should have accounted for the
           | possibility fairies will turn you into a newt if you edit a
           | gene, or into a rabbit, or if a wizard will turn you into a
           | newt. You can make up an infinite amount of this bs.
        
             | renewiltord wrote:
             | That's a pretty good point. We can make up an infinite
             | number of contrived scenarios and it is obvious from
             | context what type of safety is meant.
        
         | adr1an wrote:
         | First, even if the author is mistaken with regards to GM foods,
         | it's credibility with regards to shoshin shouldn't be affected
         | (e.g. how are GMO and shoshin related??)
         | 
         | Secondly, your hypothetical super toxic GM food doesn't exist.
         | He was referring to reality, not to sci-fi horror movies GM
         | food where a mad scientist makes a maize expressing lethal
         | bacterial toxins.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-07-05 23:01 UTC)