[HN Gopher] Astronomers witness energetic switch on of black hole ___________________________________________________________________ Astronomers witness energetic switch on of black hole Author : wglb Score : 45 points Date : 2023-07-14 17:59 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (phys.org) (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org) | dathos wrote: | "Very Large Telescope", I love this name. Any better ones out | there? | ProAm wrote: | There is the "Very Large Array" too! the VLA. I love these | naming standards. Way better than any startup or open source | project name | willis936 wrote: | Potentially inspired by Very Large Scale Integration. | ck2 wrote: | Go read about the solar gravitational lens telescope proposal | by physicist Slava Turyshev | | It is the most mind blowing thing that could actually be built | someday by humans imho, well if we decide to stop blowing all | our budget on killing other people | | https://google.com/search?q=solar+gravitational+lens | | It would be able to image exoplanets, 10 square kilometers for | objects 100 light-years away. | floxy wrote: | >solar gravitational lens telescope | | Here is a great video about it: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NQFqDKRAROI | | ...and a paper: | | https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.08421 | nonameiguess wrote: | Astronomers are great at this. Three postulated categories of | dark matter include: | | * WIMPs: weakly interacting massive particles | | * MACHOs: massive compact halo objects | | * RAMBOs: robust associations of massive baryonic objects | | There's also the HERO (hyper extremely red object), which isn't | quite dark, but close. | mecsred wrote: | The checklist is accurate: https://xkcd.com/1294/ | hinkley wrote: | The OWL was cancelled? | | Can we propose the Obnoxiously Large Telescope to replace it? | throwaway7868 wrote: | Is the "final telescope" massive enough to be its own black | hole? | etra0 wrote: | Now they're building the ELT -- Extremely Large Telescope. | | They're great with names haha. | FredPret wrote: | They should build one ten times the size of the next largest | one, and call it the Quite Sizeable Telescope | cyberax wrote: | Don't forget OWL: Overwhelmingly Large Telescope ( | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overwhelmingly_Large_Telescope | ). | OldGuyInTheClub wrote: | Or, "Once Was Larger" | | "The ESO specialists expect resolutions from OWL that are | up to 40 times higher than those of the Hubble Space | Telescope. If the 100-meter mirror cannot be financed, a | 60-meter variant is being planned. The name OWL would | remain the same. Because then the project is jokingly | called >>Once was larger<<." | | https://www.itespresso.de/2006/04/17/groesstes- | observatorium... --> Google Translate | moffkalast wrote: | Still waiting for the Stupendously Gigantic Telescope. | dmvdoug wrote: | Big Ass Telescope? | pengaru wrote: | What, no BFT? | denton-scratch wrote: | What does it mean for an AGN to "turn on"? | treeman79 wrote: | It ate a star. | ars wrote: | But that would take infinite time (as we perceive the event) | because of time dilation. | | You would not see it "turn on", you would see a slowly, very | slowly, changing signal. | willis936 wrote: | You'd be hard pressed to ever directly observe something | that is astronomically tiny and emits extremely low | frequency radiation, if any at all. | | When an accretion disk is actively ripping apart a | celestial body the plasma is some of the hottest material | in the current universe. It's extremely violent and bright. | You're seeing a gravitational well converting a huge | quantity of mass to energy. | deepspace wrote: | Yes, as I understand it, the "turn-on" effect is from the | plasma generated while the star is falling into the | gravity well. The bit of the star that passes the event | horizon would be tiny. | | Moreover, I believe that the radiation from an object | falling into a black hole is redshifted so rapidly, that | it effectively disappears from view in a very short time. | An outside observer would not see anything "lingering" | near the event horizon. | ithkuil wrote: | Yeah, the redshift and the slowing down due to time | dilation are exactly the same phenomenon. | | If the wavelength is a million longer, any event that | would take 1 second to happen, appears to us as it took | 12 days. | drojas wrote: | I think this is good evidence in favor the plasmoid model | from Eric Lerner as a replacement for black holes. Some key | differences. | | * Instead of a black hole eating a star, a plasmoid is | having an increased load. * Black holes are "gravitational" | machines while plasmoid are "electromagnetic" machines. * | With the plasmoid model there is no time dilation * With | the plasmoid model, the load is any source of plasma, not | necessarily a star | | https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=eri | c... | | https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Big_Bang_Never_Hap | p... | post-it wrote: | > With the plasmoid model there is no time dilation | | But there _is_ time dilation, so the plasmoid model isn | 't very good at explaining observations. | 01100011 wrote: | It confused me too. At first I thought it meant that a | collection of matter became dense enough to form an event | horizon and become a black hole. Instead, from | https://www.livescience.com/space/black-holes/gargantuan-bla... | | > If J221951 is indeed a supermassive black hole, its sudden | burst of brightness has two possible explanations, according to | the researchers. First, the black hole could have pulled an | orbiting star into its clutches, stretching and tearing the | star to shreds in a messy process called a tidal disruption | event or "spaghettification." The second, more mysterious | possibility is that the black hole could have shifted states | from dormant to actively feeding, as it suddenly began gorging | on the fast-moving disk of gas that surrounds it. | SomeRndName11 wrote: | Today they witness energetic switch, tomorrow - energetic router. | [deleted] | civilitty wrote: | Followed by a wireless gamma ray burst. Aimed right at us. | mrtksn wrote: | And still no reception in the kitchen. | SomeRndName11 wrote: | kitchen must be beyond the event horizon. | pixelpoet wrote: | That's because of the CMB (cooking microwave in the | background) ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-07-14 23:00 UTC)