[HN Gopher] Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a Tor ... ___________________________________________________________________ Man found guilty of child porn because he ran a Tor exit node Author : h0ek Score : 477 points Date : 2023-07-23 17:03 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (lowendbox.com) (TXT) w3m dump (lowendbox.com) | woodpanel wrote: | I'm still amazed how the security agencies pulled it off, to have | the ultimate honeypot, a digitized crime scene masquerading as a | market place auto-incriminating endless amounts of people. A | Kompromat-Miner. | | Speaking of miners, it's not like they are at the same risk as | tor node operators. Not. At. All... | | https://gizmodo.com/child-pornography-that-researchers-found... | berlincount wrote: | Yeah I've had police ring with a search warrant for the same | reason. | | Yay. Fun. | bendbro wrote: | I'm so happy to read the glowies were unable to extradite him to | the US. | | Hard working nice people | | Hard working mean people | | Local politicians | | ------------------------ | | Property criminals | | Violent criminals | | Government apparatchiks | | MAPS | | Federal politicians | devwastaken wrote: | "I rented a server in Poland and someone uploaded CP to an | Austrian image hoster. They reported it to the Austrian police, | which contacted the ISP, which gave them my WHMCS login IP and | then subpoenaed UPC Austria for my address, then queried the | weapons registry." | | The FBI method of fabricating criminal charges. Criminals sleep | comfortably knowing their governments are more interested in | playing whack a mole for political image than effectively doing | their job. Notice how in Austria they aren't charging Google, or | Facebook, or any other entities where such data passes through | every day. | zgluck wrote: | _I noticed they mentioned "logs" of you talking about hosting CP, | can you elaborate?_ | | _They took a bunch of IRC logs where I stated what I can and | can't host at a web hosting provider I owned. The logs do exist | but are taken out of context._ | | The "reporting" here is at the level of a 90s scene mag. | superkuh wrote: | True enough. But even this level of detail and research is far | beyond what the "authorities" displayed in this case. | zgluck wrote: | Have you read the court's decision? If not, how would you be | able to tell? | hengheng wrote: | A lot of wink-wink edgyness on both sides. Almost as if there | are no mature people sharing their views. | sedatk wrote: | > I was charged and convicted with the support, not the | ownership. There is ownership, sale, distribution for no monetary | gain, and support of general distribution. The last is what I got | and the lowest of all. | | Did they also charge the ISP's involved in transferring those | network packets? | tamimio wrote: | >By law they were right as the law only protected registered | companies, | | So basically to protect yourself running an exit node, register a | company, preferably offshore or not within X jurisdiction. | BLKNSLVR wrote: | The more I learn the more I realise that this has been the case | for a long time. | | Protections for companies are greater, and create more hurdles | for law enforcement, than protections for individuals. | cf100clunk wrote: | The authorities in Styria, south Austria, charged him: | | https://web.archive.org/web/20141004142101/http://raided4tor... | phyzome wrote: | Mods, please add "(2012)" to title... | neilv wrote: | Or insert something like "[in 2012]". It's a new article about | a case a decade ago. | | IMHO, this happening today would be more alarming, since Tor | today is a bit more mainstream. | | The first thought that came to mind when I saw the title is | that perhaps there's some new push against Tor. | rvnx wrote: | Quite logical, same in France and likely many countries; if you | run a Tor exit node (or any type of open proxy), you get visited | by the police if someone does something wrong on your exit node. | | Otherwise what could happen is that you run a Tor node and use it | as an excuse for any crime you do. | DennisP wrote: | I'm trying to imagine a plausible reason to (a) run a Tor exit | node, but _also_ (b) _not_ actually use Tor for online | nefariousness, and I 'm coming up blank. I don't think running | a Tor node as an excuse is a real scenario. (edit: emphasis) | | Edit2: Jeez guys. I support Tor. I'm saying anyone who runs an | exit node is also going to use Tor for anything that might get | them in trouble, not do those thing in the clear and "use Tor | as an excuse" as suggested above. That's a silly scenario and a | poor justification for criminalizing Tor exit nodes. | cs02rm0 wrote: | Any privacy advocate would do (a). There's lots of reasons to | do (b) if you don't trust the government of the country | you're in, which seems quite reasonable in a lot of countries | around the world. | DennisP wrote: | Of course, but who would do (a) without also using Tor for | anything that could get them in trouble? | tamimio wrote: | Yes because every one is living in a free country with no | invasion of privacy rights and ISP to MITM every thing about | you, US including btw with patriot Act.. and before you say | "yeah but I am not doing anything illegal!?", yet, laws | change all the time, not to mention you don't have to do | anything illegal, you just don't like spooks/ISP/etc. looking | into your business, after all, it should be the case as a | free citizen. | DennisP wrote: | See my edit above and my previous replies to your sibling | comments. | monsieurbanana wrote: | That's not how Tor works, you don't need to run a tor exit to | use it. | | If you were actually doing something nefarious and using tor | for anonymity, running an exit from the same ip doesn't sound | extremely smart. | swores wrote: | You're misunderstanding the comment you're replying to. | They're not saying you need an exit node to do bad stuff | over Tor, they're saying that anybody with the technical | ability and knowledge to run a tor exit mode would also | choose to use Tor for any bad stuff, and that therefore it | seems unlikely anyone who runs a tor exit node would also | do bad stuff directly traceable to their own IP. | DennisP wrote: | Exactly, thank you. | monsieurbanana wrote: | You're right, it took me a while but I see it now. The | phrasing is confusing | Sankozi wrote: | If running Tor protected you from any responsibility of | traffic coming from you then it would be a real scenario. But | there is an expectation that you should be at least somewhat | responsible of traffic you generate. That is why running Tor | exit node is often linked with meeting law enforcement | officials. | mrighele wrote: | In some countries "online nefariousness" include things like | trying to access gay communities, or looking information | about abortion. | DennisP wrote: | I strongly support Tor. I'm saying that anyone who runs an | exit node is also going to use Tor for anything that might | get them in trouble. Hence, it's nonsense to say that Tor | exit nodes should be illegal on the grounds that they can | be "used as an excuse," as the comment above suggested. | mikegreenberg wrote: | Based on your wording, it sounds like you're conflating the | two things together... running an exit node and using tor are | orthogonal to one another both in value provided to the user | as well as effort involved. | | Plausible reasons for: | | (a) you greatly value privacy and the privacy of others such | that you are willing to altruistically provide an exit node | as a service; your country is a police state and you are | sympathetic to those affected while also willing to accept | the risk | | (b) you greatly value your privacy and do not trust your ISP; | you cannot access content sanctioned in your country; you are | an internet engineer and need to test services which depend | on privacy as a core feature | DennisP wrote: | As someone else helpfully clarified for me, my point is | that anyone with the technical skill to run a Tor exit node | is also going to use Tor to hide any illegal activities | they do online. | mikegreenberg wrote: | Also, I assume it wasn't intentional, but consider against | arguing from the position of "I can't think of anything". | You are betraying yourself by implying that you know all | there is to know...which no one does. | MatekCopatek wrote: | Couldn't you say the same for every coffee shop that gives | random people Wi-Fi access? | fullspectrumdev wrote: | In Germany this was an actual issue until recent years - you | were strictly liable for what transited your network. | ReactiveJelly wrote: | If I was looking up illegal numbers, I would not want to do | so in a coffee shop where someone might see me doing so. | devnullbrain wrote: | A more politically controversial example would be social | media/'platforms', IMO. Google and Facebook are allowed to be | in possession of CSAM, as long as someone else put it there. | tamimio wrote: | As mentioned in the article, laws protect companies. | mikeyouse wrote: | Your coffee shop could turn over MAC addresses if the police | showed up with a warrant - especially all of the 3rd party | managed solutions with logging. | lost_tourist wrote: | What person doing illegal stuff doesn't randomize their MAC | address? | mikeyouse wrote: | There's this silly HN conceit of these super | sophisticated adversaries when the reality is most people | don't know the first thing about technology or network | topology and wouldn't know why they should obfuscate | their MAC in the first place. It wouldn't catch the 1% of | sophisticated black hats but that describes a small | fraction of actual people doing stuff online. | tamimio wrote: | MAC addresses are useless to track, you can change it, | randomize it (I think even Microsoft windows has that | feature built in too), or simply just throw away that | wireless adapter used. It would be useful if for example | these MAC addresses are tied to your identity, say when you | buy a laptop/phone, you have to go in the process of adding | these MAC addresses to be linked to you of some sort. | rootw0rm wrote: | Useful for who? | freehorse wrote: | And imagine if somebody changes their mac address to | yours and does some illegal stuff. There is not way that | this can work. | tamimio wrote: | >There is not way that this can work. | | Exactly! | ilyt wrote: | That would be absolute opposite of useful | derefr wrote: | Your effective wi-fi MAC address -- the one other devices | see -- isn't fixed in stone, and in fact modern OSes build | in support for automatically + continuously randomizing it: | https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/how-to-use- | rando... | novok wrote: | When you actually connect to the wifi network the mac | addresses stay consistent and stable on macOS / iOS at | least over multiple sessions. If they didn't do that, | then a bunch of stuff would probably break. | gpm wrote: | Not just support it, but some platforms randomize by | default | | https://source.android.com/docs/core/connect/wifi-mac- | random... | | https://support.apple.com/en- | ca/guide/security/secb9cb3140c/... | doubled112 wrote: | Yes. This drove me a little insane since I keep track of | my devices at home via DHCP lease. | thrill wrote: | The MAC address anyone can change? | MatekCopatek wrote: | Technically, yes, but realistically most random mom-and-pop | places just have a random $50 router somewhere in the | corner. | | Would it be fair/sane/reasonable to convict such business | owners if one of their customers commits a cybercrime? | rvnx wrote: | Yes, exactly, https://www.bfmtv.com/economie/des-patrons-de- | bars-en-garde-... | ilyt wrote: | Of course. But "someone sit there for an hour downloading | torrents" is not something they'd bother to chase vs "this | guy seems to be downloading 854 torrents in last 24 hours" | charcircuit wrote: | Running an exit node is not any different than being any other | ISP. You are providing another hop between servers. | TeeMassive wrote: | Swatting 2.0 will be people installing tor exit nodes | jstummbillig wrote: | No, that is not why he was found guilty. | | He was found guilty, because running a Tor exit node is not | sufficient defense against potential child porn violations. | That's good. Because if not every child porn offender could do | just that. | jeroenhd wrote: | That actually sounds like a pretty smart plan for pedos. | They'll just need to make sure not to keep any of their trash | on their own computers, which means they'd need to remember | some pretty long onion addresses, but it would probably work as | well. | | Luckily most pedos are not smart enough to do more than basic | disk encryption. | burtekd wrote: | Can someone explain the unrevokable legacy IP addresses? | techsupporter wrote: | Before the current regional Internet registry system (ARIN, | RIPE, LACNIC, AfriNIC, APNIC) began, organizations (and some | individuals) were "given" IP addresses by emailing IANA or Jon | Postel directly. | | Assignments that predate the RIRs are called "legacy" | assignments and are, theoretically, not subject to the RIR | system because those who received those addresses only agreed | to the terms as they existed at the time. Those terms were | usually "you asked, here you go." | | In practice, legacy assignments are left alone because no one | wants to go to the trouble of arguing with big entities about | it. (Most of the /8 assignments people gripe about as being | wasteful are assigned to entities with lawyers, guns, or both.) | People who have a handful of small legacy assignments get the | protection of this because it's especially not worth the effort | to say "well, if all you have is a /22 legacy, yours is now | part of the RIR system, deal with it". Especially since the | only recourse would be to allocate it to someone else and | wouldn't that be fun. | | But no IP address is actually "unrevokable." All you have to do | is piss off a handful of the Tier 1s or a slightly larger | number of Tier 2s and you'll quickly find your "bulletproof" | addresses quite useless. | pstuart wrote: | It's almost like they don't want us to run exit nodes... | | This man's plight is exactly the reason I won't. | wkat4242 wrote: | Yep I'm sure setting an example contributed a lot here. | | This decision is not going to stop exit nodes (and the worst | stuff on tor probably doesn't even use exit nodes but hidden | services) but it keeps Austrian IPs off the map making them | seem a country in control. | | The same way companies go crazy mitigating ratings on bitsight | but don't care about fixing real root problems because they're | not visible anywhere. | | Keeping your front yard clean is a big thing in IT. In our | company our corporate network is not detected by bitsight but | our guest wifi is. Meaning one bad apple in a handful of guests | can give our entire multinational a bad rating. | | So what did they do? Make sure bitsight actually shows our real | endpoints and makes an accurate result? Doing some rudimentary | checks on the guest portal to make sure outdated systems can't | connect? Only allowing VPN access on the guest wifi? | | Nope they just turned off the guest wifi so that contractors | (who still need to do the work we pay them to do) plug in the | corp network against policy, or use the coffee shop wifi next | door. | | Bitsight rating fixed, problem hidden but not actually solved | and in fact worsened by people connecting unmanaged gear to the | corp network as guest. All the while gloating in the A rating | which is completely meaningless. | dang wrote: | Related ongoing thread: | | _Why Host in Kosovo?_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36837690 - July 2023 (61 | comments) | schroeding wrote: | Wow, the website of his hosting company[1] is, eh, extremly | honest: | | > Further, as Kosovo is an extremely corrupt country, we are able | to bribe both executive and judicative as well as getting | information about court orders and raids before execution, | enabling us to move servers out of the affected location, | protecting our clients in any situation. Our excellent Serbian | connections enable us to also move servers cross-border and play | "ping pong" between both countries, essentially keeping content | online forever. | | [1] https://basehost.eu/ | npsomaratna wrote: | This isn't a parody, right? I mean, surely no-one would | (seriously) say this in public in real life? | | Right? | mschuster91 wrote: | Andrew Tate said essentially the same. Turns out corrupt | police don't like it when someone brags with that fact. | | Not that I'd shed any tear for Tate or the other guy though, | both deserve all they get and more. | dudeinjapan wrote: | [flagged] | sudosysgen wrote: | I don't think anyone is saying he should be in jail | because he's saying misogynistic stuff. The context of | his bragging about corrupt officials was on why his | illegal casinos and sex trafficking operations didn't | have any problems (while he himself never directly | admitted to it, some of his associates tweeted about | beating a "girlfriend" who wanted to stop doing webcame | shows, and he heavily implies it at time when talking | about how he "keeps women under control"). | | That's why he deserves a fair trial, and as a result, | probably jail time. It's possible he didn't actually do | anything wrong, but that's very improbable. | mschuster91 wrote: | > I don't think anyone is saying he should be in jail | because he's saying misogynistic stuff. | | For what it's worth, I do. The shit he and others of his | ilk teach to young, vulnerable men is inspiring a _lot_ | of real-world violations of women, some even get drawn to | outright terrorism and murder. | | In Germany, we call such persons "geistige Brandstifter" | for a reason. They may not light a fire on their own - in | general they keep their hands very clean and shiny to be | able to spread their message far and wide - but they sure | as hell have no issues when _others_ do the dirty work | for them. And of course when someone follows the | stochastic terrorism strategy, the preachers disavow | them. | hotdogscout wrote: | That is how fascism started, increasing the verbal | threat, a string of political assassinations and | subsequently not giving a f* because your hands are | clean, but shouldn't ideas be challenged not suppressed? | | If people cannot be trusted and should rather be cocooned | from the true range of human thought, doesn't this go | against every assumption we use to justify our freedoms? | mschuster91 wrote: | > If people cannot be trusted and should rather be | cocooned from the true range of human thought, doesn't | this go against every assumption we use to justify our | freedoms? | | Well, we've seen in 1933-1945 where that sort of orthodox | interpretations of "free speech" leads. And we've seen in | the Covid era that some people are able to _politicize | wearing masks_... or to put it differently: the | intersection between the dumbest humans and the smartest | bears and crows is so large that we cannot design | actually bear /crow proof trash cans because enough | people wouldn't be able to open them. | | With politics it is just the same: there are more than | enough dumb fucks on this planet that someone like Donald | Trump was able to lead them to storm Congress, leading to | multiple people getting killed, and more severely | injured. Society needs some sort of defense mechanism | against those ruthless enough to use moronically dumb | people as a weapon and, like Trump did, discard them | aside when they outlived their usefulness. People got | sentenced to many years worth of prison time for | following Trump's suggestion - and yet, to my knowledge, | he didn't pay a single one's legal bills, assist their | families or grant a pardon. Even the goddamn _mafia_ | takes better care for those actually risking prison time | and their families! | wonderwonder wrote: | Can you show sources for where he has caused "a lot of | real-world violations of women, some even get drawn to | outright terrorism and murder."? | mschuster91 wrote: | I wrote "he and others of his ilk". Just read the | Wikipedia article on Incels for a list of violent | incidents [1]. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incel#Mass_murders_and_ | violenc... | wonderwonder wrote: | Tate is an incel? "a member of an online community of | young men who consider themselves unable to attract women | sexually" | | I think Tate is going to be super surprised to learn | that. Dude is many things, an incel is not one of them. | | Perhaps you have been caught up in the hysteria and are | attributing things to him that he is not responsible for? | I'm not a Tate fan and think he is probably not a good | person but there has very much been a witch hunt / circus | atmosphere around those who are anti him. Dude advocates | for traditional male roles in relationships and for | people to think for themselves and try to be the best | version of themselves. Alot of it is very much a money | making scheme. He is no worse than a lot of other people | and far better than others. He has his good and bad | aspects like everyone else. If its found he is guilty of | the crimes he was charged with then I hope he goes to | prison. If not then he has a right to speak. | mschuster91 wrote: | Oh he's not an Incel by any means, but he's regarded as | the ultimate role model, the person to become, by a hell | of a lot of them. And _that_ is the true danger behind | Tate: there are a lot of people able and willing to | commit an awful lot of criminal or offensive things just | to get to the point he is. | wonderwonder wrote: | Would you not prefer that incels, including the list of | those you provided that committed violent crimes instead | change who they are, gain confidence in themselves, | establish a relationship and live a normal life? The list | you provided was a group of people that committed "an | awful lot of criminal or offensive things" without him. | Seems like them gaining some self confidence and | accepting responsibility for their own place in the world | would be a good thing. Something he advocates for | sudosysgen wrote: | He's not an incel, but he specifically targets incels and | the incel movement. Men who don't have any problems | finding women they want to date aren't a suitable target | for this kind of rhetoric. | wonderwonder wrote: | Does he encourage them to remain incels or to better | themselves and become something else? Seens like incels | are pretty bad and we should encourage them to not be | incels anymore. | lamontcg wrote: | > In Germany, we call such persons "geistige | Brandstifter" for a reason. | | The "there's a world for that in German" thing is | probably a good (but obviously imperfect) inoculation | against extremist propaganda. | | I'm often frustrated that we don't have pithy little | phrases specific to all kinds of bad behavior in English. | It is easier to talk about things if they're given | specific names. | Fnoord wrote: | You're free to adopt them in English. Such as | 'schadenfreude'. We got a Dutch word for that; | leedvermaak. | someweirdperson wrote: | It's nice to have specific terms for special generic | concepts. However, use of the German language doesn't | stop there, and creates an association between some terms | and use in a specific political context, removing these | expressions from politically correct usability even | outside of the political context that claimed them. And | those are a lot more subtle and difficult to identify | than e.g., allow/deny-lists. | brightlancer wrote: | As a commenter just proved, "nobody is saying" is always | false. It may only be a few nutters, but often it's lots | and lots of nutters (even prominent members of | government). | | Despite the name, most folks in Western Liberal | Democracies who call themselves "liberal" or similar | aren't actually interested in liberalism and only want | democracy when they win (so they can oppress those who | disagree with them). | hotdogscout wrote: | What do you mean? | | If I understood you correctly, it would be something like | (as rhetorical example) liberals wanting the government | to take action in ensuring same sex marriage even if that | goes against the cultural beliefs of the majority? | | My rebuttal ,if I understood you, would be to point at | the difference between a democracy and a dictatorship of | the masses. | | You hopefully can't legalize lynching in a liberal | democracy even going by their original intent, which | includes human rights and civil liberties. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_democracy | Eisenstein wrote: | > The supposed human trafficking charges against him | appear to be completely bogus and Kafka-esque, and | therefore violate his rights against arbitrary arrest and | detention. | | I don't know enough details on the 'kafka-esque' nature | of the charges, so I won't comment on them, but he has | more than one credible rape accusations him against in | his home country, and he talks openly about using women | as sex workers and taking their income from it. | jokethrowaway wrote: | It's hard to judge what is true or not, especially if | it's about a public figure and especially when said | public figure seems to be making the most idiotic choices | ever. | | There are plenty of women pretending to be cool, even | doing rape role play and then using recorder material to | blackmail men. He was obviously into BDSM stuff (he was | being grilled for a video in which he was hitting a woman | with a belt - the woman went on video to record it was | consensual), so it would be incredibly easy to trap and | blackmail. | | Similar situation with human trafficking: the girls were | always free to leave but they were getting paid for sex | work. He was for sure a digital pimp (not sure if that's | a crime). | | Overall, I don't think Tate is an actual abuser: it would | be incredibly stupid to go public with such a past; I'd | bet he is just a self centered narcissist who likes to | get into risky and dumb situations and thinks nothing bad | will happen to him because he's God. | Eisenstein wrote: | > it would be incredibly stupid | | > I'd bet he is just a self centered narcissist | | These two things are not mutually exclusive. In fact, one | would think that a narcissist who has gotten away with it | all his life would think he was invulnerable. It | certainly tracks that he would be open about it. | | And really, if it walks like a rapist, and it talks like | a rapist, and it acts like a rapist... it is probably a | rapist. | napierzaza wrote: | [dead] | more_corn wrote: | You appear to be utilizing non-objective information | sources. You are almost certainly incorrect in your | assessment. | jrflowers wrote: | Can you elaborate on how you know that the human | trafficking charges are bogus? | skilled wrote: | [flagged] | Eldt wrote: | Sounds like a parasocial bias | PicassoCTs wrote: | They were for assange, and various other dissidents.. | jrflowers wrote: | This is a good point. An entirely unrelated person was | accused of a completely different crime in a different | country once. This is proof that human trafficking | doesn't exist. | arrosenberg wrote: | Even if you believe that, Andrew Tate isn't a dissident, | nor does he have any claims to journalistic protections. | At best he's a deep-fried Tom Leykis and at worst he's a | human trafficker. | [deleted] | Ms-J wrote: | "especially when we offend" | | This is a fundamental premise of freedom of speech and a | large reason as to why it exists. | | For some reason your comment was flagged, I vouched and | voted it up. | sudosysgen wrote: | I don't find that comment objectionable because it is in | favour of freedom of speech, I find it objectionable | because it pretends someone with multiple credible | allegations of rape and associates who admit to using | violence to incite women into sex crimes, who admitted to | running illegal casinos and who says he moved to Romania | because he doesn't have to follow the law is only in | legal trouble because people disagree with his ideas and | has done nothing illegal that would warrant charges. | hotdogscout wrote: | Thank you! This happens way too often here, thoughtful | arguments being flagged because a few with enough karma | believe socialist ideals are mandatory. | martin1975 wrote: | It's not. I come from that area. He's telling the truth. | marcinzm wrote: | His statement being factual and his statement, admitting to | breaking laws in Kosovo, being a rational thing to say | publicly are different things. | coldtea wrote: | It's perfectly rational if nobody cares about the laws | being broken there, and they will have no repurcursion | for admitting to it. | krisoft wrote: | Not at all. Admiting it publicly has all kind of | repercussions internationaly even if there are none | locally. | freehorse wrote: | They cannot be arrested in Croatia or anywhere else for | breaking laws in Kosovo. | ZiiS wrote: | Most banks etc will cut business even if you cannot be | arested. | Ms-J wrote: | Thankfully there are alternatives to banks when they try | to dictate, such as cryptocurrency or even Hawala. I've | used both with great success. | marcinzm wrote: | Bribery is illegal in many countries including | specifically the bribing of foreign public officials | including in Croatia. | marcinzm wrote: | There being no immediate repercussions doesn't mean there | aren't going to be any long term when you basically give | governments a loaded gun aimed at your own head. | Eventually someone might decide to use it even if the | reason for it has nothing to do with the gun. | | This is a person who, by their own statement, had out of | context IRC logs used by the government to convict him of | a different crime. | zgluck wrote: | Yes. That is also why we need to keep Kosovo out of the EU | until this has been fixed - which I'm pretty sure won't | happen any time soon :(. | CSMastermind wrote: | I've heard similar things about Romania and Bulgaria | which are both EU countries. | Longhanks wrote: | Corruption is also common practice within the EU (see: | Eva Kaili), most of the upper EU just hides it better | while pointing fingers at "unaligned" states, inside and | outside of the EU. | | If Von der Leyen wasn't corrupt, I'm sure she wouldn't | have any problem handing over her texts. | worrycue wrote: | > If Von der Leyen wasn't corrupt, I'm sure she wouldn't | have any problem handing over her texts. | | Haven't found much on this. Frankly there is no need to | allege corruption against this particular EU politician | when there are better examples like those involved with | the Qatar scandal. | mvanbaak wrote: | > wouldn't have any problem handing over her texts | | This is the same non-reason as is being brought up with | cameras filming you 24/7 etc. 'You dont have to worry if | you have nothing to hide' ... It's an invasion of | privacy, and it is worth fighting against that. | yunohn wrote: | This is an absurd argument. | | We're talking about texts between the EU President and | Pfizer's CEO, not some randos. | | https://www.politico.eu/article/new-york-times-sue- | european-... | logifail wrote: | > It's an invasion of privacy, and it is worth fighting | against that | | VdL should have a private phone and a work phone, just | like everyone else. | | If these work messages are from her work phone, she | should hand them over. If they are work messages on her | private phone, she should also hand them over. She simply | cannot claim to have been having non-work conversations | with anyone at Pfizer. | mvanbaak wrote: | I have non-work conversations with staff and coworkers at | work all the time, and also work related conversations on | private channels from time to time. The world is not as | black-and-white as you think it is. | dghlsakjg wrote: | Being forced to share correspondence related to your job | as a public official seems different to exposing your | entire life to a camera. | brightlancer wrote: | Was she acting as a private individual or as a government | official? | | Government has ZERO right to privacy; government agents | in their capacity have ZERO right to privacy. | | If a government agent uses a private account to do | government business, then a) they should be fired/ | removed and charged for trying to hide that business and | b) those accounts should be turned over to the | government, redacted of anything not related to the | government business, and everything else made public. | | A private individual has a right to privacy. Government, | including anyone acting as its agent, do not. | izacus wrote: | Plenty of things are "heard" with dubious truthfulness. | mhitza wrote: | Romania has high levels of corruption, but when we | entered the EU we had high levels of overt corruption. | | I'll never forget during the presidential elections of | early 2010s (or around that time) (we joined EU in 2007) | when a member of the loosing party (which would then | become our prime minister), Victor Ponta, stated frankly, | in an interview, that they lost because his party stole | fewer votes (bribing the poor with meager amounts of | household products to vote for them, which is a favorite | campaign activity around here). | | However to combat this prolific corruption (in part | because of EU mandate), around the same time, our winning | president instated the National Anticorruption | Directorate (DNA in Romanian) which is a "taskforce" of | judges and lawyers investigating these highly profilic | cases. | | It became moderately successful (there's always room for | improvement). The EU took note, and brought in members of | the directorate to instate a similar structure centrally | as an EU institution (for cross border corruption cases), | and afaik the process has been set in motion to instate | the same directorare in Bulgaria (under the guide of a | certain prosecution attorney that lead this directorare | in Romania, Laura Codruta Kovesi). | OfSanguineFire wrote: | Whenever foreigners bring corruption in Romania, I try to | emphasize that while it exists, it is no longer very | visible unless you are in fairly high-level business and | politics. There was a time when everyone on the bus had | to contribute 5EUR when crossing the border, so that the | customs officials wouldn't go through everyone's luggage. | A time when you couldn't register a sole proprietorship | without at least offering the clerk some chocolate or | whatever as a token bribe. But that all disappeared about | 2006 and life in Romania is little different from Western | EU states. | optimalsolver wrote: | *losing | | Just FYI. | yankput wrote: | Well we first need to fix the tensions with Serbia, which | is impossible. | skilled wrote: | It sounds like you have never been to a country where money | can buy anything you want, including freedom. Many such | countries in the world. | dale_glass wrote: | Such countries exist, but as this case and Andrew Tate | show, actually putting it in such frank terms may not be a | good idea. | | Yeah, maybe you can buy yourself out of trouble. But I | suspect in many such cases the people involved prefer to be | bought quietly. | | Make things too uncomfortably public or too embarrassing | and the same people might well throw the book at you. | skilled wrote: | I don't know the specifics of his case but it is my | understanding that EU isn't as easily bought as South | America or Southeast Asia for example. | | The latter has a system that doesn't "include" | foreigners, whereas someplace like Romania is a lot more | Westernized and offering a bribe carries a lot more risk. | purple_elephant wrote: | But you don't say these things out loud. Swiss bank ads | don't look like this: "Genocidal dictators, we will help | you hide your money!" | someweirdperson wrote: | You are just not part of the right target group, so | facebook won't show them to you. | lb1lf wrote: | Well, money will only buy you freedom in such places until | you annoy someone with deeper pockets than you have | sufficiently so that they want you to wind up behind bars. | | Corruption is an equal opportunity weapon. | [deleted] | skilled wrote: | Sure, but that's in extreme cases. For small stuff like | papers, permits and such - talking to the right people | will get you anywhere you want to go. | | I still remember handing over my passport to a guy on a | sports bike in Singapore to get an extended stamp for | Indonesia, and only a few years later did it occur to me | how sketchy the whole situation was. | AwaAwa wrote: | You mean all, it's just the amount that differs. | bcye wrote: | Parody, honeypot, maybe both | tedivm wrote: | Seriously- I feel like I was just added to several | government watch lists simply for opening that page. | sgjohnson wrote: | I know the guy. No, it's not a parody. | yankput wrote: | The Serbian community in Kosovo kind of ignores all laws. | | Up until recently they basically had free/stolem electricity | and they used it to mine bitcoin for free. | dtx1 wrote: | They should rename themselves to basedhost after that statement | KingLancelot wrote: | [dead] | abwizz wrote: | could be targeted marketing essentially saying "don't worry, | it'll be fine" | lo_zamoyski wrote: | Wouldn't full disclosure make them, in some sense, _honest_? | | Also, you have just condemned entire nations of people, like | those who lived under Soviet domination, where bribery became | custom, because if you wanted to accomplish _anything_ , you | had to bribe the people involved. Just got married and want an | apartment for your new family? You could submit a housing | application, but it _might_ bubble up to the top of the queue | by the time you hit retirement. A bribe given to the woman in | the office handling the paperwork can help grease the track. | Have a totally curable disease that, without intervention, can | kill you? Well, you could have your name added to a long wait | list and have your treatment started next year, or you could | "gift" your state-pensioned doctor a cognac, some luxury | chocolates, and an envelop containing a "tip" to shorten the | wait time. Need to travel abroad? Well, guess what. The | passport stays with the government for "safe keeping". They | might not be in a hurry to let you leave, just yet. However, | with a few enticing arrangements and exchanges, you'll be on | the next plane headed over the Iron Curtain. | | In other words, I'm not convinced bribes are a categorically | wrong thing for someone to offer. To receive, on the other | hand... | barrysteve wrote: | He condemned accurately. | | The soviet system sounds pointlessly overloaded with middle | men. Why not abandon the "official system with middle men | bribes" and descend all the way into mafia families and | protection rackets? | | No matter the empathy I have for the suffering. What is the | point of offering a bribe, to bully the system, in the same | way the receiver intends to break the rules? | | Just tell the truth and say the system sucks. You scratch my | back and I'll scratch yours done en masse, hardens society | for everyone and then you have to bribe, like the Soviets | did. | iudqnolq wrote: | Not necessarily. Making that statement, setting up in a country | that has enough issues to make it plausible, and then not | paying the bribe would also make a lot of sense. See also: no | log VPNs that actually were logging. | | Worst case scenario they shut down, collaborate fully with the | police and keep all the profits up til then. Better case | scenario they make a deal with the police and keep operating | and making profits while covertly providing assistance. Best | case scenario the issue never comes up and they make all the | profits without having to spend those expenses. | | My impression is that in this kind of shady web hosting the | companies never last that long so you wouldn't want to invest a | lot in bribes and multiple data centers and so on when you | could lie and make short term profit. | | Note also that corruption isn't a boolean flag. First off the | cop make take the exact same strategy: take your money, do | nothing else, and hope their boss never gets interested in you | while planning not to protect you if anything comes up. | Furthermore there are all sorts of anticorruption efforts in | that area linked to US aid. That doesn't mean there isn't | corruption, it does mean that if a major US corp works with the | FBI in a major investigation the local police may rather piss | you off than lose critical aid funding. | sillysaurusx wrote: | Which vpn was no-log-but-logging? I was shopping around for | an alternative after mullvad blocked port forwarding, but it | seems like no one else is as trustworthy. Not that I need it | for my "attempt to port forward smash ultimate from within | crummy hospital internet" purposes, but hey, principle of the | thing and all that. | foobiekr wrote: | All of them. | trogdor wrote: | I am all-but-certain that NordVPN doesn't. I am in | possession of records from a recent police investigation | in which law enforcement subpoenaed NordVPN and the | company replied, essentially, that they had no | information connecting a particular IP address, at a | specific date and time, to any specific user. | | (I am a reporter who covers law enforcement and crime.) | Etheryte wrote: | You must be mistaking NordVPN for Mullvad. | rvba wrote: | Looking at the scale of NordVPN they either already have | a liason with aurhorities inside, or are hacked by | authorities. | | The (law enforcement) agencies can just go to the few | biggest VPN suppliers. Just like they go to FAANG. | chollida1 wrote: | > Looking at the scale of NordVPN they either already | have a liason with aurhorities inside, or are hacked by | authorities. | | Based on what? You just seem to be making a wild | unsubstantiated conjecture here. | tarboreus wrote: | It's obviously an unsubstantiated statement, but given | all the concrete information on the MOs of alphabet | agencies, it seems like a reasonable bet. If they haven't | done one of those things, they probably just haven't | gotten around to it yet. | [deleted] | KeplerBoy wrote: | It's the perfect honeypot situation, isn't it? | Nanana909 wrote: | Is it that wild? There are a few questions we have to ask | | 1. Do these agencies have the motivation to do the above? | I think the answer here is an obvious yes to everyone | | 2. Do these agencies have the technical ability to hack | the VPNs, the finances to pay them for access, or some | other reasonable measure to coerce compliance? | | If 1 and 2 are both true, then the OP claim is also | certainly true. | | Given that 1 is true, I don't think it's "wild" to claim | that these agencies cannot satisfy 2. In fact I'd say | given the historical record, the more wild claim is that | the CIA/NSA etc is incapable of satisfying #2. | ejiblabahaba wrote: | Are you sure you're not thinking of Mullvad? | | Related: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35638917 | jokethrowaway wrote: | buy a cheap vps server with btc and setup your own vpn | UnixSchizoid wrote: | Or you could use a cloud providers free tier, but then | you have to give up your credit card info and name for | "verification" | remram wrote: | You'd have to hope the VPS host is not logging... | Wowfunhappy wrote: | > Further, as Kosovo is an extremely corrupt country, we are | able to bribe both executive and judicative as well as getting | information about court orders and raids before execution. | | What happens if someone else is willing to pay a higher bribe | than you are...? | atmosx wrote: | No more ping-pong... | coldtea wrote: | Or if the order comes with strong pressure from the mafia or | the government, and it's not ammenable to a bribe-override? | codedokode wrote: | Bribes don't work like a shop where you can come from the | street and buy something. You need to have connections first. | beebmam wrote: | That's for the discount | rchaud wrote: | It's to ensure that someone in the network has pre- | screened you, and that you understand the rules about how | the bribe is to be paid. | not_alexb wrote: | In fact, bribes can walk up to you without any connection | to you (re: corrupt police) | bell-cot wrote: | _Competent_ corrupt officials can do the math, and understand | ongoing 1X bribes are far better than poisoning their money | tree by stupidly accepting a one-time 10X bribe. | novok wrote: | until they want to retire | tamimio wrote: | That actually made me laugh loud! | aleph_minus_one wrote: | > understand ongoing 1X bribes are far better than | poisoning their money tree by stupidly accepting a one-time | 10X bribe. | | Relevant concept: Present Value of Future Cashflows (see | for example | https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/presentvalue.asp). | moonchrome wrote: | In a volatile place covering for illegal thing that can | bite you in the ass - you'll take the payout, gain | political points by cooperating with some agency and spin | yourself as a hero in the case. | optimalsolver wrote: | "There's probably no one so easily bribed, but he lacks | even the fundamental honesty of honorable corruption. He | doesn't stay bribed; not for any sum." | | -Discussion of a rather sinister court official in Isaac | Asimov's 'Foundation And Empire' | yyyk wrote: | It's more complicated than that. After all, these bribes | aren't exactly public and transparent. A competent corrupt | official can always pocket the 10x and pretend that the 1x | target didn't pay in time, or that some other official did | it, or some other excuse. | hesdeadjim wrote: | I've seen it in the business world, but trust is everything | and if you break it once even accidentally good luck. When | crime enters the picture you probably won't ever get more | than a single chance, or worse, be in physical danger if | you do. | watwut wrote: | I dunno. The one thing I took away from reading both | memoirs of people involved in crime (yes it exists) and | reports about their court cases is that there is no honor | among chiefs. | | And there is very little trust too. They lie and defraud | each other constantly. They do kill each other too, but | most often because someone knows too much or has | something want. | alephxyz wrote: | The saying is no honor among _thieves_. Unless you mean | chiefs as in c-suite, in which case it's also accurate. | leonewton253 wrote: | Found his email via reverse ip: me@william.co.il | | https://rdns.im https://prnt.li https://william.co.il | https://whois.domaintools.com/basehost.eu | decremental wrote: | [dead] | croes wrote: | Back then in Germany they charged the people who reported CP. | onetimeusename wrote: | _Someone used the same exit to hack a NATO facility in Poland, | which deals with chemical and biological weapons. Disarming, etc. | | The US tried to extradite me from Croatia in 2017, with not much | more info than national security. | | They lost their case as I am married to a local and cannot be | extradited outside the EU._ | | So once again the "think of the children" motive is used to cover | for intelligence interests. | BLKNSLVR wrote: | Always, and in all ways | jaylittle wrote: | I stopped running a Tor non-exit node from home a few years back, | because a lot of websites and platforms blacklist any IP | associated with Tor. I couldn't actually watch anything on Hulu | for years (though they were still happy to take my money, which I | refused to give them) because of this. | | Running a tor node is a thankless thing one can choose to do. | Nevertheless I did for years. I don't do it anymore. | chrsig wrote: | > Running a tor node is a thankless thing one can choose to do. | Nevertheless I did for years. I don't do it anymore. | | It's hard to determine tor's net-value to society, since it's | such a double bladed sword. I'm not sure it's something | deserving of thanks. | Sterm wrote: | This is the point where you need to check your privilege. I | used tor when living in a dictatorship to find out things | which would destroy the moral fabric of society, such as | information about lgbtqia+ issues, what condoms are, pop | music and news that the government didn't want to spread. | ReactiveJelly wrote: | I'm a Tor user. It's also hard to determine because so much | of the web is read-only or downright inaccessible via Tor. | | Most big sites use a chain of reputation like this: | | 1. To have an account on our site, you need a reputable | email. Mailinator doesn't count. 2. To get a reputable email | (GMail, Outlook, etc.) you need to sacrifice a phone number | to receive texts to prove you aren't a bot. 3. There are no | free VoIP services. Or they're blocked. | | Reddit usually lets me create accounts without email, but I'm | guessing they will cut this off soon. | | I'm on a friendly Mastodon instance, but I had to offer a | bogus email to register, which is technically dishonesty. | | YouTube sometimes works. | | I had a Discord account for a while. One of my ERP partners | was willing to take the hit and set up a GMail account and | Discord account for me (Discord wouldn't even let me in, I | had to have him create the account and then give me the | password.) | | But I didn't log in to Discord for a while, and recently it | said "Hey check for a confirmation email". I went to log in | to GMail and it said, "Hey this is suspicious, please give us | a phone number." | | So there's no point re-joining, if I can only talk to people | and have a "free" email address for as long as I can cyber- | fuck someone into letting me borrow his phone. And I won't | buy a burner phone because it's likely to have the same | problems, plus all the PITA of real-life opsec. | | The gratis web is fading to nothing. Everyone wants | something. None of it is truly free. The fediverse instances | will run as long as they get donations, but charities are | subject to a tragedy of the commons. They will eventually | close up registrations if enough humans join for the parasite | bots to follow them. | | People ask me why I bother. I must admit the payoff is not | big. | | I bother _on principle_. Anonymity is something that I | _should_ have. I don't look at CP or anything. I do this | because I like to learn, I like to practice, I like to know. | You may as well write it off as religion and ask a Christian | why they attend church or a Jain why they don't eat onions. I | simply believe it is worth doing. | brightlancer wrote: | > The gratis web is fading to nothing. Everyone wants | something. None of it is truly free. The fediverse | instances will run as long as they get donations, but | charities are subject to a tragedy of the commons. They | will eventually close up registrations if enough humans | join for the parasite bots to follow them. | | You blame "everyone wants something" but it's more clear in | your last sentence: abuse by unverified users. | | Lots of folks will provide services for free (actually | free, no data collection etc.) but very few folks have the | disposable income to _pay_ for someone to handle abuse. | | So folks who provide popular services long-term have to | find some way to pay for it. OMG, imagine that. | | With the caveat that cryptocurrencies are usually rubbish, | cryptocurrencies have allowed folks to anonymously pay for | anonymous access to services. This won't work for most | mainstream services (in large part because of government | opposition), but it's an option. At some point which I hope | to live to see, we'll go back to the old days of | anonymously paying for anonymous access. (Cash was | awesome.) | tamimio wrote: | >Running a tor node is a thankless thing one can choose to do. | | One might argue that's the case with most activities on the | internet, maintaining an open source projects for free? Helping | others in forums and online discussions? Dedicating time to | find good articles to submit to HN!? The only thing you will | get is some brownie points online. I believe who does run an | exit node usually aren't motivated by thanks and upvotes, that | being said, thanks for your time and efforts running that node! | fruitreunion1 wrote: | It's so silly that some sites block addresses that weren't exit | nodes. | sillysaurusx wrote: | Thank you for operating it as long as you did. | momentoftop wrote: | At various times, I have run a Tor relay node on a spare VPS. I | think I stopped in the end because my available bandwidth was | pretty below par, and I suspected I wasn't helping the network | very much. | ilyt wrote: | I tried, after 2 months my VPS provider basically said "either | you close it down or we close you down" as they were getting | requests to take it down (IIRC DMCA or other bullshit like | that) | haakon wrote: | I still do it, and have been for over a decade, and I'm rarely | bothered by it. I think I get a few more captchas because of | it, and I can't load https://www.investopedia.com, which I | would frequently like to, but that's it. | jeroenhd wrote: | Looks like there's more going on than what the title implies | about the Tor exit node: | | > What do you do now? | | >SSI left Austria and now work for a German company in IT, and | have a data center in Kosovo... hosting grey area things there. | Warez primarily. | | > Also, I do want to add that I have more backstory. The CP was | not the only reason for the raid. | | He goes on to mention someone using the exit node to try to hack | a NATO facility. | | That said, the "confiscate first, come up with a fitting crime | later" approach countries take on a whim are deeply troubling. | | It sounds like they have had their suspicions against this man | for a while (not without reason, it seems) and saw the child porn | report as a chance to pounce on him, but later found out they | didn't have as strong a case as they might have wished. | peytoncasper wrote: | Why don't we put Tor nodes in space? | | Seems like a few hundred micro satellites could circumvent | sovereignty this way. | jeffbee wrote: | Only 11-year-old Libertarians think this way. "Circumventing | sovereignty" is the surest way to destruction. Anyone who | stands outside the protection of a legitimate sovereign power | will be immediately destroyed by a real country. If you fly | your shit out in space and declare your satellites to be | independent of any flag, I am sure that they will all promptly | disappear due to mysterious causes. Likewise, if you believe | that you will simply move to a remote floating platform where | you declare independence, you will soon discover what the U.S. | Navy is for. | sunbum wrote: | How would they get network? Ground stations would just | blacklist them. | wkat4242 wrote: | Ground stations aren't commodities. You'd need to build your | own just like any existing sat network. | | I agree it's a pipe dream. Launch costs are too high and | nobody will approve this. | treyd wrote: | You still need downlinks with this. You _could_ have some base | stations run by amateurs, but that paints a target on their | backs in a similar way running a Tor node already does. | ghaff wrote: | As with Sealand/HavenCo and international waters/micronations | more broadly. Even if no country with guns chooses to take | direct action, it takes very little--if they care enough--to | cut off supplies and any meaningful communications. | mikae1 wrote: | Does anyone remember https://wired.com/2007/01/the-pirate- | bay-2/ ? | IshKebab wrote: | You need approval to launch satellites. Plus a stupid amount of | money. | zer8k wrote: | It would probably be easier to leave an exit node on a barge in | international waters to be honest. | ilyt wrote: | and provide internet _to who_ ? Exit node still needs ISP to | connect to. | tamimio wrote: | They will most likely be owned by a company that still under a | jurisdiction on earth. | whimsicalism wrote: | *not in the US | kristopolous wrote: | This kind of stuff has happened many times before. | | I did a video about "the dark web" a couple years ago where I | talked about people on zeronet and freenet getting snagged | because of potentially the contents of their cache store. It's | made for a non technical audience | | https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3gMJlQU9TDQ | luvthis wrote: | [dead] | chad1n wrote: | I'd avoid hosting a tor exit node at all costs, considering that | they are a lot of bad actors on tor. Even some 3 letter agents | can host cp on your tor sites and then accuse you. | gruez wrote: | >Even some 3 letter agents can host cp on your tor sites and | then accuse you. | | You can't use exit nodes to run "tor sites", because they only | allow outbound connections. You can run hidden services, but | they work entirely through relays (ie. not exit nodes). Given | that hidden services are end to end encrypted (none of the | relays in the middle can see the traffic), and to my knowledge | _relay_ operators have generally not been prosecuted, your | specific scenario is unlikely to play out. | | That said, if you're running a exit node and the FBI wants to | frame you, they can still use your relay to conduct some | illegal action (eg. uploading CSAM to some clearnet site), and | pin it on you. | lucasap wrote: | If you become an ISP (with your AS) then it is less of a | concern (in the US) since ISP have some protections. Emerald | Onion [0] is an example of doing this. Actually in their faq | [1], they state: | | "Digital Millennium Copyright Act Safe Harbor | | The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) offers four safe | harbors to protect ISPs from copyright liability for the acts | of their users, provided that certain requirements are met (17 | U.S.C. SS 512). Emerald Onion is a section 512(a) "conduit" | provider." | | If you want to read the section it is here: | https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/512 (it is generally | about "Limitations on liability relating to material online" | not just copyright) | | [0] https://emeraldonion.org/ | | [1] https://emeraldonion.org/faq/ | palata wrote: | > Even some 3 letter agents can host cp on your tor sites and | then accuse you. | | Well they can probably put illegal material in your apartment | and then accuse you. | wkat4242 wrote: | Yes but you're unlikely to be on their radar, a lot more | likely though when you're running exit nodes and your IP | comes up in investigations. | palata wrote: | Sorry, but I don't think it's quite how it works. Because | you show up in an investigation doesn't mean that the | police will frame you. | rolph wrote: | its also possible to mail it to you under a "controlled | delivery" investigation | vorticalbox wrote: | I'm under the impression that mail doesn't "belong" to you | until it is opened. | rolph wrote: | its not very hard to convince someone to open or sign for | registered mail. | | this usually last resort with hopes of eliciting self | incriminatory statements. | | i.e. [i didnt do the CP i was just snooping servers] | thallavajhula wrote: | This is similar to the first Episode of the "Mr. Robot" tv show. | wow. | wkat4242 wrote: | Not really. That person in the show didn't run an exit node but | an entire commercial content network. The person in this case | has no involvement in creating or hosting content, he's just | involved in transporting traffic (any kind) because he believes | in anonimity. His only motive is a principle, not money and he | certainly doesn't agree with the content. | | I loved that scene by the way, where he disregards the changes | of emotional state in his target and then just explains he's | doing this in person because his shrink wants him to interact | more with people. | | A really super strong first 10 minutes of a truly excellent | show. Well except season 2 IMO, that was too drawn out for me. | noAnswer wrote: | He runs https://basehost.eu | wkat4242 wrote: | Yes but I don't think he did back when this happened? And | still he's only a "bulletproof" hoster as far as I | understand. | anigbrowl wrote: | Might be worth adding (in 2012/Austria) to the title. Few people | understood what Tor was back then. | puffyengineer wrote: | Good. | npteljes wrote: | How? | DoItToMe81 wrote: | What are the aforementioned "taken out of context" IRC logs? Very | curious to see if they were painting the bullseye around the | arrow here, or if he actually said he'd host CP. | sillysaurusx wrote: | The eternal struggle. Information wants to be free, and then | people use those freedoms to do the most screwed up things | imaginable, and people like this pay the price. | | It's a damn shame how the original cyberpunk dream played out. We | could've had a world where companies couldn't do anything about | people using their ideas. Instead we get one where you can't even | be anonymous without rubbing elbows with child predators. | | It's surprising how much anonymity and the subject at hand are | correlated. In my 20s I liked to explore, as I'm sure many of you | do too. I once met someone in the Whonix community who wanted to | nix google maps entirely; he spent a lot of time downloading maps | and trying to make a way to view them locally, which I think is | going to be prescient one day. It already is in many parts of the | world -- you don't have cell service, so you can't just pull up | google maps. Nowadays starlink solves that problem, but back then | it wasn't clear that we'd ever be able to have maps at our | fingertips regardless of internet access. This was back in the | era of that poor CNET reporter that got lost with his family in | the mountains precisely because of no maps, and ended up dying to | exposure when he went to get help. Never leave your car. | | I found all of this fascinating. What a project! Make all of | google maps accessible right from your phone, with no internet. I | briefly fell in love with that community. | | Ultimately what drove me away was the literal flood of child porn | that was always right next to anything to do with tor, whonix, or | anonymity in general. I have a pretty high tolerance for | "operating in gray areas," like this guy. But one of the | tragedies of the cyberpunk dream is that the entire scene has | been coopted by cp. In some sense cp is the ultimate test of | anonymity, since you'll be thrown in prison pretty much instantly | if caught. So perhaps it's no surprise that it's the most common | and pervasive result of anonymity, but it sure is a shame. | failuser wrote: | Cyberpunk was not about a dream. It was more of a warning to | all those people who thought that technology will bring utopia. | "High tech, low life" is the guiding principle of cyberpunk -- | technology will not solve societal problems all the cool tech | brings issues that were not foreseen. With corrupt government | and corporations not going anywhere just because the | computations and communications got faster. | belorn wrote: | > you can't even be anonymous without rubbing elbows with child | predators. | | Statistically there is quite a large number of criminals in my | city, and since I visit shops and other parts of the city, I am | bound to unknowingly to me been rubbing elbows with those | criminals. We are all anonymous to each other, and what can I | really know about the person in front of me in the store. Go | past a few hundred people and someone will be a person I would | not associate myself with, and yet here I am living in the same | city as them using the same infrastructure, and in some way | enabling the activity by contributing taxes. | | Not to say I don't understand the emotional reaction people | have. I have relatives in the countryside that refuse to visit | the city because of all the criminals that they hear about. It | is also fairly common to hear people moving out of the city to | the calmer suburbs in order to get out of all the shootings and | crime. I also do know first hand that if you go and look for | it, finding drug dealers and shady activity is not exactly a | big secret. Go to specific streets or part of the city and it's | operated in plain sight. | | I've always seen the original cyberpunk dream as being | analogous to a city, with all its benefits and drawbacks. | throwaway914 wrote: | There are many, many pedophiles out there. I'm also convinced | of a conspiracy theory that a lot of dark web traffic and hosts | are created/operated by secret parts of the gov to de- | legitimize the need for anonymity. I believe this because it | would be too easy with the access to that material and no | oversight. Just muddy the waters so nothing in there looks | worth protecting. | | </tinfoil-hat> | barrysteve wrote: | You literally don't need a tinfoil conspiracy for that idea. | | IBM is moving to passwordless auth on their server access. | Preferring biometrics. Their youtube channel tells you | directly. | | The "mainstream" culture has been pushing that idea for five | years now, Philomena Cunk said we shouldn't follow the | anonymous guy in 2018, golly gosh. | | My iphone plainly face scans me and my shopping malls and | sports stadiums do the same. | | Frankly the last place left to BE anonymous is Tor and on | soap-box websites like this where the admin can decipher my | ID but you don't know who I am. | | Obiwan has the realistic attitude. "The war's over. We lost." | | It's impossible to completely eliminate secrets, but the | liberty of the 1990s is deader than a dodo. Anonymity, the | unknown citizen, staying off the map is basically reserved | for martians now. | ip26 wrote: | _There are many, many..._ | | It's a little puzzling to me still why this is. Physical | attraction to almost-adults isn't some big mystery, but most | cp is something else entirely. | Eisenstein wrote: | I'm curious about how you make the distinction. Does it | make sense to you that adult men would be attracted to each | other? If so, how is this fundamentally different than any | other non-procreative human-human attraction? It is not | obviously evolutionarily beneficial for adults of the same | sex to be attracted to each other, so why is this in | particular a mystery? | | I contend that human sexuality is not easy to | compartmentalize and that it does not exist in any | particular way as an obvious evolutionary benefit except | for adult-adult-heterosexual. | | Of course rapists (including child molesters) should be | kept from offending and otherwise punished for offenses | because of the harm that it causes, but nothing about any | sexual orientations seems strange to me that it exists. | | Of course I am not able to understand on an innate level | since I don't feel the same way. I'm not sure anyone could | really understand what it is like to be of a different | orientation because it is so intertwined with the self that | it is just incomprehensible. One can understand in the | sense that one can acknowledge it, but I don't think one | can understand in the sense that they actually 'get' it. | | I'm interested in other people's perspectives on this | thougjh. | jrflowers wrote: | I'm no expert here but I'm going to guess that | equivocating gay people and pedophiles is not the best | starting point to understanding pedophiles. | [deleted] | Eisenstein wrote: | Do you agree that 'adult-adult-hetersexual' is the only | orientation that has obvious evolutionary benefit? If so | then every other orientation does not. There is no | 'equivocation' there is only 'why would anything else | exist?'. My contention is 'who knows?', but if you accept | that one orientation without evolutionary benefit exists, | then why would you be confused that another different one | also exists? It is not 'homosexuals and pedophiles are | the same'. | jrflowers wrote: | I like this question because you explicitly ask me to | agree with your premise that pedophiles and gay people | are equivalent within your framing of this discussion and | then follow it up with "my contention is something other | than what I've clearly explained" | [deleted] | johnnyanmac wrote: | >it does not exist in any particular way as an obvious | evolutionary benefit except for adult-adult-heterosexual. | | it's not unique to nature. You're in heat, you want to | mate with anything that looks attractive. What's | attractive will vary immensely based on societal and | personal experience, for reasons we still cannot fully | understand as the human mind is still a huge secret to | unlock. It's not perfect in the same way that few parts | of nature are perfectly optimized. Remants of old | patterns or general heuristics on "what is good enough" | will remain and they can persist for very long times. | | The only unique-ish thing about humans is that we have no | "mating period". We are continuously in heat compared to | most of nature, so that urge remains around consistently. | Virtually every form of society has evolved some sort of | culture to control these urges (as well as ways to | control sexual conflict, which is another topic entirely) | in order to advance as a civilization otherwise it'd be | non-stop mating | nicoco wrote: | Doesn't seem that much tinfoil hat to me. The Snowden leaks | taught us that a bit of tinfoil hatting is reasonable. Before | we had access to so many cop video footage, the ideas that | they were the bad guys and did stuff like actually being the | guys who attack and break stuff during protests were | considered crazy. Etc, etc. | sanderjd wrote: | > _It's a damn shame how the original cyberpunk dream played | out._ | | Isn't it more, "This is why the original cyberpunk dream was | always a naive and bad idea"? | | Like, it appealed to me too when I was young, but then I | learned more about humans and our history and ... | AnonymousPlanet wrote: | Since when was cyberpunk a dream to be pursued? It's the | opposite of a naive dream. It's a nightmare full of high tech | and people living on scraps, constantly trying to keep up | with the tech fallout from big corporations. One of the most | iconic places in cyberpunk was literally described as being | "like a deranged experiment in social Darwinism, designed by | a bored researcher who kept the thumb permantently on the | fast-forward button." | | How is this appealing? It's a warning, not a cosy idea to | aspire to! | hickelpickle wrote: | I think the phrase people are looking for is cypherpunk, | idk why the whole thread is referencing cyberpunk which has | little to do with the subject matter and ideals being | discussed, which are related to the cypherpunk movement. | antod wrote: | I think this is the difference between cyberpunk as a | fiction genre and the views of the people calling | themselves cyberpunks back in the day (or reading the Wired | articles about them). | johnnyanmac wrote: | really depends on your literature. Star Trek's | interpretation of the future is very different from Dune's. | Much of cyberpunk tends to be cynical but there are some | more utopic interpretations out there as well. | [deleted] | pessimizer wrote: | > Instead we get one where you can't even be anonymous without | rubbing elbows with child predators. | | There have been secretive child predators ever since statutory | rape was invented. The reason that you didn't have to "rub | elbows" with them is because our governments hadn't begun | systematically closing off all avenues for anonymity other than | the one that they built and maintain for their own spying. If | there's only one way to be anonymous, you get to "rub elbows" | with everyone who needs to be anonymous for any reason. | | It has nothing to do with child porn or crypto. Neither were | responsible for the size of the distributed files kept on each | of us to grow in orders of magnitude. | | Speaking of "maps at our fingertips," good luck finding one | that doesn't result in a record of the lookup and any GPS data | submitted with it being inserted into a half-dozen databases, | all freely accessible by the government, or by anybody buying | in bulk. | nobody9999 wrote: | >Speaking of "maps at our fingertips," good luck finding one | that doesn't result in a record of the lookup and any GPS | data submitted with it being inserted into a half-dozen | databases, all freely accessible by the government, or by | anybody buying in bulk. | | Et voila! Maps at your fingertips[0] with no | logging/tracking. It's amazing what those ancient (ca. 1995) | humans could do. Perhaps they had help from aliens -- as we | couldn't possibly do any of that stuff by ourselves. /s | | [0] https://wwp.randmcnally.com/product/rand-mcnally-road- | atlas | colanderman wrote: | > good luck finding one that doesn't result in a record of | the lookup and any GPS data submitted with it being inserted | into a half-dozen databases | | My handheld non-networked GPS unit with map tiles downloaded | in bulk from OpenStreetMaps meets this criteria. Not very | obscure. | johnnyanmac wrote: | >There have been secretive child predators ever since | statutory rape was invented. | | Sure, emphasis on secretive. I'd hope that 'secretive' on the | internet would mean more secretive than mistyping a query on | a popular site's search engine. Or simply wandering into a | linked, public website. But alas. | kedean wrote: | Just regarding your overall concern around maps and cellular | service, Google Maps lets you download maps within very custom | sized tiles for offline use. I'm partial to using them when | hiking, so I can orient myself in areas where the actual trail | markers become questionable. | | Routing doesn't really work offline, but that's a | different/harder problem. | daemontus wrote: | No disrespect, I use offline Google maps almost daily, but | there are far far better offline hiking apps out there. | | Google will probably work ok for the most popular trails, and | I guess you can use it as a supercharged compass. But at | least in Europe, if you actually plan a route in any | mountains based on Google, you're in for an adventure :) | akira2501 wrote: | > Instead we get one where you can't even be anonymous without | rubbing elbows with child predators. | | Says the person posting under the name "sillysaurusx." | | > Whonix community who wanted to nix google maps entirely; he | spent a lot of time downloading maps and trying to make a way | to view them locally, which I think is going to be prescient | one day. It already is in many parts of the world -- you don't | have cell service | | Here's an idea, maybe he should print those maps out, bind them | together into a larger map, and then find a really complicated | way to fold them up so he can keep them handy when needed. | | > In some sense cp is the ultimate test of anonymity, since | you'll be thrown in prison pretty much instantly if caught. | | And yet.. it is still produced in the physical world where none | of these constraints actually exist. It's only promulgated and | marketed through anonymous means. | asveikau wrote: | >> [...] you can't even be anonymous [...] | | > Says the person posting under the name "sillysaurusx." | | I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean. I recognize that | username as someone who has been posting here for a long | time. Not to encourage doxxing or making his identity the | focus, but he has lots of contact details on his user | profile. Tons of people are identifiable on here, even if the | usernames are whimsical. | [deleted] | barrysteve wrote: | Free information is worth what you paud for it. | | Authority figures and scientists don't share the expensive | info. | dragonwriter wrote: | > back then it wasn't clear that we'd ever be able to have maps | at our fingertips regardless of internet access. | | Offline map databases were commom then; it wasn't uncommon for | car navigation systems to come with them (expensive to update, | though), as well as handheld devices | | In fact, while they were not _common_ before the 2000s, first- | party navigation systems with offline digital maps for cars | have been around at least since the 1980s, as have other forms | of consumer offline digital maps. _Online_ maps are newer than | offline. | | > This was back in the era of that poor CNET reporter that got | lost with his family in the mountains precisely because of no | maps | | The last of many critical errors before the car got stuck might | have been avoided by using a map, but they had and used a paper | map shortly before, when choosing the alternate route that was, | in fact, closed; it wasn't a problem caused by maps not being | _available_ (and there is a reason keeping paper road maps, | especially of unfamiliar areas, when driving in them was a | widespread practice until digital maps with automatic offline | downloads tied to GPS became ubiquitous. | mindslight wrote: | Tangential to your much larger lament - OpenStreetMap, and | specifically OSMAnd which is libre and free on F-droid, works | great for offline maps that are downloaded ahead of time. (I | think the version on Google Play limits the number of regions | you can download unless you make a small donation). | ragequitta wrote: | Google maps offers this functionality. I've had my local map | and maps of any place I regularly go to downloaded for many | years. | nullc wrote: | Google times out the downloaded maps without warning, so | you go to use them and find out it won't let you use them. | grepfru_it wrote: | It will eventually cease to exist. | | I went to Grenada in 2014 and used offline maps to drive | around the island. In 2015 the tablet suffered an accident | and I powered it off to deal with it later. 5 years later I | power it back on without internet connectivity. Turns out | the maps expired. So much for many years | tetris11 wrote: | Organic Maps on F-Droid, is a literal godsend in offline | raster maps. I used OSMand a lot on my old phone, buy since I | downgraded it just could not load the vectors fast enough | aembleton wrote: | Give mapy.cz in the play store a try. Seems to be much | snappier than organic maps. Uses osm data | xigoi wrote: | But it's proprietary, and built by a company which loves | tracking. | [deleted] | DenisM wrote: | >back then it wasn't clear that we'd ever be able to have maps | at our fingertips regardless of internet access. This was back | in the era of that poor CNET reporter that got lost with his | family in the mountains precisely because of no maps | | That was 2007. I had maps of the entire US loaded on my pocket | pc circa 2005. | | Edit: that was "Mapopolis" in my case. There were plenty more: | https://wiki.geocaching.com.au/wiki/GPS_software_-_Pocket_PC | brightlancer wrote: | > I had maps of the entire US loaded on my pocket pc circa | 2005. | | How much did that cost? How many folks had it? When did it | stop getting updates? | | Most folks (likely including GP) didn't have easy access to | offline electronic maps in their pocket in 2007 and didn't | know anyone who had offline electronic maps in their pocket. | | Does that make them stupid? | DenisM wrote: | > How much did that cost? | | $100 for the maps, available to anyone with a pocket pc and | access to Google. | sgath92 wrote: | 2008 I had a totally offline map of all of North America in | my car's aftermarket radio (7" touch screen, AM/FM, DVD | player, GPS, analog TV, SD slot, all running a version of | WindowsCE that was already outdatted). System cost me about | $400. Bought it so I could do backroads road | trips/exploring by car, as it didn't need (or even have) a | way to connect to the 'net to do it. I can still get | updated maps for it, but I don't bother. | | Handheld gps's with offline maps go back even further. I | was using them from '03 to '08. Garmin made a bunch of ones | that were no bigger than a early-gen blackberry. Back then | it was relatively easy to get pirated updated maps for | them. | tguvot wrote: | i traveled across europe in car at same time frame with | pocket pc (asus mypal) and igo maps loaded on it (still have | it in my drawer). those days you can get igo offline maps on | android. also sygic. | | it was always strange that google maps was accepted as some | kind of magic while turn by turn navigation with voice | directions was available from mid 2000s | | nowdays i always have sygic installed on my phone. came handy | when google maps decided to freak out while i was driving | through death valley to gas station. | tomcam wrote: | > turn by turn navigation with voice directions was | available from mid 2000s | | Did those turn by turn systems allow you to just drag the | map onscreen anywhere to change location to anyplace on | earth? To drop pins and send links to anyone in an email? | To be updated instantly and for free when the data was | refreshed? | tguvot wrote: | >Did those turn by turn systems allow you to just drag | the map onscreen anywhere to change location to anyplace | on earth? | | as long as you had maps installed for this area - yes | | >To drop pins and send links to anyone in an email? | | yea. multi-point navigation with ability to search along | the route/in the area/specific city/etc. all without | breaking route. you could also save route iirc. i had 2 | weeks road trip pre-planned. | | there was some ability to share route/coordinates. don't | remember details | | > To be updated instantly and for free when the data was | refreshed? | | back than maps weren't updated that frequently. in | general. | | on the other side, it gave you ability to go anywhere | without having a data connection. google offline maps are | still very limited. igo was showing on screen next two | maneuvers back than. google still didn't figure it out. | or ability to show real 3D landscape and 3D | landmarks/buildings. or ability to mark street as blocked | so navigation will route around. getting traffic | information from radio in case there is no internet. | johnnyanmac wrote: | >We could've had a world where companies couldn't do anything | about people using their ideas | | doesn't sound like the best idea depending on what industry we | are talking about. medicine, yes. Art, no (we're kinda going | through that right now actually). | | >In some sense cp is the ultimate test of anonymity, since | you'll be thrown in prison pretty much instantly if caught. So | perhaps it's no surprise that it's the most common and | pervasive result of anonymity, but it sure is a shame. | | This quote constantly rings in my head about topics like this: | | >The moral of the story is: if you're against witch-hunts, and | you promise to found your own little utopian community where | witch-hunts will never happen, your new society will end up | consisting of approximately three principled civil libertarians | and seven zillion witches. It will be a terrible place to live | _even if witch-hunts are genuinely wrong._ | | It's the real downside of apathy when you see complaints about | those big sites out there and how they screw up. You | advertising a new site means the most interested are going to | mostly include the worst actors, who eventually put off the | best actors. Or at least disproportionately include them. | | As a simple example: say Twitter has 10 million users and 1000 | nazis (utopic, I know). Now your new no BS alternative attracts | 0.1% of users but 10% Nazis. Still far from a majority. But by | the way these forums work, your site will be 1% nazis, and | those nazis will be some of your loudest actors if left | unchecked. 100x more concentrated and it will feel some 1000x | more nazi. | jmkni wrote: | > he spent a lot of time downloading maps and trying to make a | way to view them locally | | Isn't that, like, a map? lol we've had maps long before the | internet | zo1 wrote: | Have you tried to buy a paper map lately? It's next to | impossible, at least here where I am atm. | toby- wrote: | Where are you that it's "next to impossible"? That really | surprises me. | | I'm in the UK, and you can walk into any Post Office, | WHSmith, bookshop, most newsagents, etc., and pick up maps | of the local area or country, usually Ordnance Survey[0] | maps. | | And (at least when I was in secondary school, about a | decade ago) map reading was still taught as a valuable | skill, using OS maps. | | [0]: https://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk | delecti wrote: | One of the big benefits of digital maps over paper ones is | "where am I on the map", and GPS alone doesn't send any data | back. | vel0city wrote: | Even then there were lots of apps out there which provided | maps offline before Google maps was even an idea. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Streets_%26_Trips | | https://winworldpc.com/product/softkey-key-master-maps/10 | | And then that's also completely ignoring the hundreds of | portable GPS devices sold before Google Maps was a thing | which had offline road databases. | | I can navigate anonymously without cell signal easily. My car | has a GPS in the dashboard which, at least for the maps and | routing, doesn't go online at all. | patrakov wrote: | > I can navigate anonymously without cell signal easily. My | car has a GPS in the dashboard which, at least for the maps | and routing, doesn't go online at all. | | I agree that this is indeed possible. The problem is with | the propaganda that says that you should not agree to such | a low standard of only being able to see the map and route | your trip based on road connectivity and nothing else. | Modern route planning takes into account inherently real- | time information such as accidents and other roadblocks, | which is only available online. | nobody9999 wrote: | >I agree that this is indeed possible. The problem is | with the propaganda that says that you should not agree | to such a low standard of only being able to see the map | and route your trip based on road connectivity and | nothing else. Modern route planning takes into account | inherently real-time information such as accidents and | other roadblocks, which is only available online. | | I'd note that while real time traffic updates are nice, | they are just a convenience, not a necessity. | | In fact, GPS (unless you're in a war zone and need to | direct munitions or out in the middle of nowhere) is | _also_ a convenience and not a necessity. What 's that? | It is a necessity? Tell that to Ferdinand Magellan -- | hell he didn't even have a paper map. | | That's not to say GPS/online traffic updates and the like | aren't useful. They absolutely are. But they aren't | necessary and at least for me, if the choice is to use | such tools and be tracked or use another method that | doesn't track me, I'll choose the latter every. single. | time. | | Not because I have anything to hide, but because _my | business is my business and no one else 's_. | andybak wrote: | Paper gets heavy real quick and personal microfiche readers | never caught on. | freehorse wrote: | At least paper does not run out of battery, though | itronitron wrote: | I imagine it's really hard to drive a car and use a | microfiche reader at the same time. | kevin_thibedeau wrote: | The Electro Gyrocator essentially worked that way. You | placed transparencies over the CRT for the map section | you were currently in. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electro_Gyrocator | | https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-features/ph-origins- | navi... | yankput wrote: | It was bullshit from the start | charlieyu1 wrote: | Do jurisdictions really care about child porn before internet? | I always feel like it is just a convenient excuse for them to | get away with their bullshit, for a largely non-existent | problem. | Analemma_ wrote: | They did, but it only existed on small scales then. The | Internet drove the cost of production and distribution down | to basically zero, so, as classical economics predicts, the | amount of production exploded. | brightlancer wrote: | > The Internet drove the cost of production and | distribution down to basically zero, so, as classical | economics predicts, the amount of production exploded. | | No, economics predicts that _use_ will explode if the cost | is zero, but that's not a comment on production. | | Pocket cameras have reduced the cost to record sexual | abuse, but that's dwarfed by the ability to reproduce/ | distribute those copies. | | I don't think that means sexual abuse is more common. On | every other metric we have, it appears sexual abuse is | _less_ common. | pessimizer wrote: | No, they didn't. They still don't. Not having a victim on the | other side of the case (possession of child porn, not | production of child porn) gives judges an easy excuse (and no | opposition) to sympathizing with the accused and suspending | the sentence. | | Child porn is just leverage to pry. We used to care as much | about sending information about birth control through the | mail. And with the modern movement to sexualize children as | soon as possible, they might have to use another excuse in 20 | years. "Terrorism" will always work, because it doesn't mean | anything. | BLKNSLVR wrote: | I believe this is the case, as unfortunate as it is. | | The loudness of their voices in "protecting the children" | when politicians are introducing new communications | surveillance measures, with no mention of local, boots-on- | the-ground, child protection services funding increases, | just screams to me that they care about surveillance a lot | and about protecting children not at all. | wkat4242 wrote: | > It's a damn shame how the original cyberpunk dream played | out. We could've had a world where companies couldn't do | anything about people using their ideas. Instead we get one | where you can't even be anonymous without rubbing elbows with | child predators. | | Corporate government is pretty much a staple of. all cyberpunk | franchises though. | EGreg wrote: | Maybe open source generative AI can help solve cp. Cater to | all these pedophile fetishes, and no need to exploit | children? Remember how we phased out ivory for piano keys, | and other poaching? | | With diamonds, there is still a push to source "the real | thing" kept alive by De Beers, and other cartels like that. | But for a lot of poaching, we found replacements. I think | that's how plastic got started too btw! | | Also PETA has approved fake lab-grown meat, perhaps it can | reduce demand for torturing so many animals in factory farms. | | PS: Japan has a culture of infantile hentai or something in | its animation - which may alleviate a lot of demand for | actual cp -- how much cp is in Japan? (There seems to be a | lot of unusual/unnatural sexual norms in Japan... from | Hikkikomori to dating vending machines to total celibacy for | a large proportion of the population.) | https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2009/may/11/japan-child- | po... | localplume wrote: | [dead] | haakon wrote: | Generated CSAM is equally illegal as "real" CSAM in many | countries, such as Norway. Here, even fictional | descriptions of such material in written form is illegal. | ChainOfFools wrote: | this is possibly because generated CSAM may look like no | real human child nor resemble any human child in | particular _today._ give it 5 years and physical | distinction from real children and even a specific child | is likely to happen. so a photo perfect likeness of your | kid ends up in some disgusting video and the creators get | off the hook because it 's 'not real' by say a narrow | color gradiation or kinematic similarity standard | undetectable to human eyes? no thanks. | dotnet00 wrote: | That isn't really much of an issue, some places count | material intended to resemble a real child or derived | from CSAM (etc a drawing referenced from real CSAM) as | still being illegal. That would handily cover the | situation you've mentioned. | | In those cases, for fictional CSAM to be legal, it has to | be completely fictional such that any resemblances can be | shown to be completely coincidence. | anthk wrote: | Even Lolita from Nabokov? Because that book depicted that | as joking about the reader and on male society in | general, as there was no actual erotism on anything but | the narrator's "mind"/protagonist. | | Similar on how people got Starship Troopers wrong. Is not | about _cheering_ fascism, but to ridicule it. | haakon wrote: | Lolita is covered by an exception for art. I doubt such a | book could be written in Norway today, but you can't | really ban historical literature. | cooldrcool3 wrote: | Have you actually read Starship Troopers? It isn't | exactly ridiculing facism. | jowea wrote: | I believe he is referring to the more widely known movie. | brightlancer wrote: | In both the book and the film Starship Troopers: | | * persons can choose whether or not to do government | service | | * Rico's parents are quite rich even though neither are | citizens | | * the Moral Philosophy class tries to _discourage_ | individuals from government service | | * the instructor for Moral Philosophy explicitly tries to | get the students to think for themselves | | In the book but not the film: | | * the only benefit of government service is the right to | vote | | * only veterans (i.e. no active service members) can vote | | All of these (and more) are contrary to fascism. The book | is not fascist. Verhoeven never read the book and didn't | satirize fascism -- he satirized a _caricature_ of | fascism. | RajT88 wrote: | > Similar on how people got Starship Troopers wrong. Is | not about cheering fascism, but to ridicule it. | | Well - the film also had a disconnect with the book on | the topic of fascism. The book was more on the pro- | fascism side. | thomastjeffery wrote: | The film intentionally satirized the book. | treis wrote: | I still can't decide if it was just a bad movie or satire | by someone that didn't quite get how satire works. | Eisenstein wrote: | It was satire by someone who _absolutely_ understands how | satire works. Starship Troopers, the film, is brilliant. | | The same director did Robocop, and if you don't get the | genius satire of that, then I can't help you. | RajT88 wrote: | In fairness, those films can be enjoyed both | superficially and as satire. | throw0101a wrote: | > _Maybe open source generative AI can help solve cp. Cater | to all these pedophile fetishes, and no need to exploit | children?_ | | Illegal in Canada (even animated/cartoons): | | * https://windsor.ctvnews.ca/man-facing-child-porn-charges- | aft... | | Edit: fictional material seems to be illegal in quite a lot | of countries: | | * | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_child_pornography | | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional_p | orn... | tekla wrote: | CP is disgusting and everything, but I'm kinda weirded | out about thought crime. If no harm is being done, not | even indirectly to anyone else, why is it a crime? | | It's not illegal to write a fanfic that you keep to | yourself about all the weird ways that you want to | torture and kill someone. | throw0101a wrote: | It is not without debate: | | * https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/djls/vol25/is | s1/2/ | | And as my updated/edited comment mention, Canada is not | unique in this regard: | | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_child_pornogr | aphy | | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_fictional | _porn... | | Going back to Canada, some cases: | | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in | _Cana... | | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R_v_Sharpe | | Perhaps the thinking is that it could create a positive | feedback loop that may help the desires grow to the point | 'actual' action is taken. | tekla wrote: | I'm sort of confused by these rulings. So people got | convicted for possessing loli manga/similar stuff that | has no relation to real life at all. | | I understand that it can be illegal at the State level, | and that its a grey area at the federal level. What I | don't get is the disconnect between these rulings and | whatever is available on the clearnet. | | We're not talking onion sites. Reddit, Twitter, 4chan, | pixv, tumblr, Patreon whatever sites that you can just go | to that shows up the front page of Google. They all | contain similar content and almost none of it is taken | down for illegality, at most because someone thought it | was too ick and Ad money, or posted in a non-r18 area. | | Even fucking 4chan is incredibly strict about ban | hammering/deleting anything that is close to CP | | Genshin Impact and Blue Archive are not popular because | they are good games. | [deleted] | johnnyanmac wrote: | >They all contain similar content and almost none of it | is taken down for illegality, at most because someone | thought it was too ick and Ad money, or posted in a | non-r18 area. | | Simple, the internet is huge and some currently contended | US law means that (past illegal content) a web host isn't | responsible for content users upload. Copyright means | that corporations can DMCA certain content off, but | otherwise, there's not much to do. Companies don't WANT | to have to look through every single post on a site that | big, so if they can automate or simply ignore it, they | will. | | The legality in Canada is questionable, but Canada isn't | looking through Reddit with a fine tooth comb (P.S. it | technically is against reddit TOS to upload lol manga | stuff. But it's hard to enforce on small subreddits). | Canada may not even know what Pixiv is, and Patreon is | often behind paywalls. It would just take a good (well, | bad) mainstream awareness to answer your question, and | the answer would turn out to mostly be "because | politicians didn't know until CNN/Fox News blasted it". | | That much was obvious during the U.S. controversy on | Rapelay, a Japanese 3d eroge simulator that was not even | sold in the US (nor ever has been), simply mislabeled by | Amazon and visible in American's store for a while. | | >Genshin Impact and Blue Archive are not popular because | they are good games. | | well we're getting very off topic but this is still an | odd angle. There's no one reason why these games are | popular and talking about fan art vs. game quality is | arguing a chicken vs. the egg. Let's just agree that fan | engagement in this day and age can be a force multiplier | in terms of advertising something and spreading the | brand. But 10,000 x 0 is still zero. Just ask how F-Zero | is doing. | stevenwoo wrote: | Slight correction: it's now every Americans' first | amendment right to send that fanfic to the subject after | Counterman vs Colorado. | johnnyanmac wrote: | >It's not illegal to write a fanfic that you keep to | yourself about all the weird ways that you want to | torture and kill someone. | | pedantic, but it depends on many factors that can make | that goal realistic. You probably wouldn't get flack | about how you'd kill Trump or any public figure you're | far away from, but some specific individual can be seen | as a threat in some countries. Even the US isn't fully | lenient on that. | | >If no harm is being done, not even indirectly to anyone | else, why is it a crime? | | politics, mostly. For example, in Japan uncensored | genetalia is still illegal, animated or otherwise. | Despite some of the most explicit pornography hailing | from it. These come from WW2 times where the US imposed a | bunch of sanctions, but have long since been irrelevant. | So why not just repeal that law? | | Well, what politician wants to be the one to fall on that | sword and get the buck rolling? It's political suicide to | the voter base (mostly older people) even if most people | wouldn't be strongly affected by it. That's one among | many many other factors, of course. | | And that's a relatively uncontroversial aspect of | society. Can you imagine trying to go to bat about the | above topic? | EGreg wrote: | Well, if actual harm to people and children is what we | want to reduce, then perhaps decriminalizing an innocuous | (as in no victims) form of it may actually reduce the | harm to actual people. | | Just like the cases for decriminalizing prostitution and | drugs: https://time.com/longform/portugal-drug-use- | decriminalizatio... | | And btw -- it's not just about thoughtcrime, it's a major | double standard, seems to me. In the West it's perfectly | normal for Hollywood to put out "Rated R" horror movies | that feature gore and torture, ripping off limbs, mass | murders, etc. Such as the movie "Hostel". I never | understood why that is OK, why the music industry has | pushed gangsta rap etc. for decades, but then something | like Cuties out of France which actually _critiques_ the | hypersexualization of teenage girls that is taking place, | causes an uproar, while the industries doing the | hypersexualization are now an accepted part of our | liberal "freedom of speech". | singpolyma3 wrote: | Cuties controversy was only about some versions of the | poster, and no one involved saw the movie. No one who | watched the movie thought it was super controversial I | think. | EGreg wrote: | https://www.parentstv.org/blog/how-does-a-film-critic- | justif... | | These guys did: | | _As for Netflix, how can the company possibly reconcile | a "coming-of-age" film, and one that centers entirely on | 11-year-old girls, with a TV-MA rating? This is not a | random decision - it has become corporate practice. | | We have frequently called on Netflix to stop hosting | content that sexualizes children, such as Baby, Big | Mouth, Sex Education, or that glamorizes rape and sexual | assault such as 365 Days. | | And Netflix habitually markets adult content to young | audiences. Parents Television Council research of Netflix | programming designated as "Teen" reveals that nearly half | was rated either TV-MA (104 titles, or 40.8%) or R (23 | titles, or 9.0%); and every single program that carried a | TV-14 moniker included harsh profanities. | | While we may not always see eye-to-eye with film critics, | the criticism of the critics is telling. Cuties is not | the first time Netflix has blatantly promoted programming | that sexualizes children, but we're calling on them for | this to be the last._ | Tao3300 wrote: | Did they watch it? I don't see anywhere where they said | they actually watched it. | brightlancer wrote: | > Cuties controversy was only about some versions of the | poster, | | False. | | The final performance by the young girls was also | discussed. You can find it if you want to watch something | disgusting, but it was very sexual and OBVIOUSLY | inappropriate for children. | | That it's common to see children perform such sexual | routines at dance competitions doesn't mean it's | appropriate. | | The idea that this was Only The Poster was a lie created | by a media that thinks child exploitation is OK. Look at | the media response to the film "Sound of Freedom", where | it's "QAnon adjacent" to oppose child sex trafficking. | brightlancer wrote: | Legalized drug sales and prostitution among adults have | _fewer_ victims but that doesn't mean no victims. | Legalization is better but it isn't a panacea. | | > Such as the movie "Hostel". I never understood why that | is OK, why the music industry has pushed gangsta rap etc. | for decades, but then something like Cuties out of France | which actually critiques the hypersexualization of | teenage girls that is taking place, causes an uproar, | while the industries doing the hypersexualization are now | an accepted part of our liberal "freedom of speech". | | AFAIK, everyone involved in the production of "Hostel" | was a legal adult. | | The girls who were the main characters in "Cuties" were | not legal adults, nor anywhere close. I don't even think | they were teenagers. From the clip I saw, it wasn't a | _critique_ of hypersexualization so much as LITERAL | HYPERSEXUALIZATION. There may have been an ironic plot | around it saying "this is bad mmm'kay" but that doesn't | excuse using children to engage in sexualized behavior. | | There's an important conversation to be had about US | culture and violence versus sex and language (South Park | parodied this well), but "Cuties" is a horrible example | because it used actual children to engage in actual | sexual objectification. | xigoi wrote: | The issue has become so emotionalized that if you say | anything that even remotely looks like supporting | pedophilia, people will tell you to go kill yourself. | pessimizer wrote: | They'll do that if you criticize the Barbie movie, or | fail to. | johnnyanmac wrote: | Barbie has always been strangely entwined in the | political atmosphere, funnily enough. You become an | iconic kids toy and it's inevitable. | Tao3300 wrote: | It seems there's nothing worse than a moderate these | days. One extreme thinks I must be a Satanist for not | believing in the massive conspiracy to harvest | adrenochrome from tortured children, while the other | extreme thinks I must be a Nazi for not believing in a | trans genocide. | marvin wrote: | Even written, where I live. In principle even the author | only wrote it for themselves, and no one ever knows. | That's pretty close to thoughtcrime. | [deleted] | tenpies wrote: | > generative AI can help solve cp | | On a side note, there was a very good film about this last | year called _The Artifice Girl_. | | Think indie, very theatrical with only three settings and | three very clear acts, but thought-provoking and with some | unstated implications. I would recommend watching it | without checking IMDB or any review site first. | noAnswer wrote: | > Ultimately what drove me away was the literal flood of cp | that was always right next to anything to do with tor, whonix, | or anonymity in general. | | As a teen around 2003 I hosted a freenet-node | (freenetproject.org). It generated 1TByte/month which I believe | was a lot for the time. I shot it down and never came back, | because the only things that ever loaded was cp and Chechnya | rape and torture videos. Its not a network for "dissidents"... | I gave up on humanity. | sanderjd wrote: | Humanity is mostly good, it just isn't universally good. | Providing services that rely on "universally good" to avoid | being dominated by the tiny but horrible minority is always a | disaster. | OfSanguineFire wrote: | How do you know what was uploaded, let alone that those were | the only things uploaded? If I remember Freenet's model | correctly, files were distributed across the network as | encrypted fragments and no one knew what exactly was being | shared on his own node. | noAnswer wrote: | (I was a curious teenager and followed links I shouldn't | have.) It had a ~1998 web feel. So you would mostly | discover things by surfing around. Normal content would | take ages to load or didn't load at all. (Bad distribution, | because no-one had interest in it.) While the other stuff | would load faster than AmpLand. (Very good distribution, | because lots of demand.) | | Plus: There was a eDonkey like file sharing program that | worked on top of freenet. (As well as a Usenet clone and a | "Instant" Messenger.) You could share files without | uploading them first. Like Gnutella it had passive search. | (It shows you the files and search terms of other users | going through your system.) So you could see what the | demand was for. Edit: The demand was not for Hollywod | movies. | Sterm wrote: | There is no such thing as running a relay in freenet. | Every user is the same as every other. The size and | traffic of your node is literally a setting on the gui. | All traffic and data are encrypted so you have no idea | what's living on your node and what's coming in and out. | That's the whole point of freenet. | orangepurple wrote: | Run a DC++ client connected to some major hubs and snoop on | the queries that people search for and you will lose all | hope for humanity. | OfSanguineFire wrote: | People definitely search for awful stuff, but that | doesn't mean that such stuff is the only thing shared on | DC++. It is films and music that draws so many people to | DC++. | [deleted] | geraldwhen wrote: | 20 years ago, DC++ was the best place to get full anime | seasons with fan subs. Nowadays, nearly everything is on | Hulu, or crunchyroll, or illegitimate streaming sites. | MayeulC wrote: | I'm just wondering if some of this could be automated | scans (possibly by law enforcement?) | jowea wrote: | It's the same thing with the old reddit alternatives. Very | few people are actually going to bother purely for the sake | of principles, so the alternatives end up flooded with the | ones that are forced to alternatives for good reasons. | | If the mainstream Internet banned "dissidents" I believe such | things would have more uptake by other types of users. | Euphorbium wrote: | But google maps provide offline maps, and have done it for | years. You just have to save them in advance. | linsomniac wrote: | My BIL used to work CP with the DHS, a tech going in heavy with | the first wave to secure devices. | | I asked him if he had ever run into Tor exits, he said no, but | they did sometimes run into people with unsecured wireless that | had been used by third parties and once it was clear that was | what happened it was pretty much dropped. I'm sure they would | have ways to deal with people leaving their WiFi open as a way of | camouflaging their activities... | | He also said that one thing they're usually do if there are | multiple people in the house is sit them all down on the couch | and say "We are here because someone has been downloading CP", | and often everyone would turn and look at one person. | optimalsolver wrote: | >and often everyone would turn and look at one person | | Slowly, like in sitcoms and cartoons? | insickness wrote: | >everyone would turn and look at one person | | So the person everyone thinks would do it is pronounced guilty. | I don't see any way that could go horribly wrong. | toby- wrote: | It at least gives you an idea of where might be fruitful to | begin your investigation... | linsomniac wrote: | That's likely the starting place for the investigation, not | the end. | nitwit005 wrote: | > and often everyone would turn and look at one person. | | Probably falsely assuming it's the 12 year old son instead of | the 35 year old father. | alexeldeib wrote: | This sounds far more like a roommate situation than a semi- | nuclear family. Still applies, albeit less so. Not like looks | are real evidence, but it points them the right direction. | throw0101a wrote: | > _I asked him if he had ever run into Tor exits, he said no, | but they did sometimes run into people with unsecured wireless | that had been used by third parties and once it was clear that | was what happened it was pretty much dropped._ | | Could one have open Wifi "accidentally" (on purpose) as a | defence mechanism against one's own actions to introduce | reasonable doubt? | | Bruce Schneier in 2008: | | * | https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/01/my_open_wirel... | grepfru_it wrote: | Yes, but it is a very weak defense that can be smashed e.g. | your device is seen communicating with the BSSID of the | closed wifi, or your mac address (open wifi) is seen | communicating with surveilled target. | | Maybe in 2008 this was plausible, but it was also plausible | to disguise one's self and walk to mcdonald's free wifi with | a burner wifi card and/or Kali Linux. With the proliferation | of surveillance devices everywhere it becomes an uphill | battle | krabizzwainch wrote: | In college I used this excuse when my apartment buildings | self managed wifi cut off my internet for torrenting. I | just went into the office and was like "a torrent? Idk what | that is...". But it wasn't anything more official than a | guy in my apartment's office's ability to turn my internet | back on. I didn't even have to prove I had an open Wi-Fi | network. | BLKNSLVR wrote: | How often do they raid a residence and find nothing? | RyanAdamas wrote: | I was always standoffish of Freenet for this kind of reason. | rolph wrote: | i think this was more than CP. | | "What do you do now? | | I left Austria and now work for a German company in IT, and have | a data center in Kosovo... hosting grey area things there. Warez | primarily. | | Also, I do want to add that I have more backstory. The CP was not | the only reason for the raid. | | What do you mean? | | Someone used the same exit to hack a NATO facility in Poland, | which deals with chemical and biological weapons. Disarming, etc. | | The US tried to extradite me from Croatia in 2017, with not much | more info than national security. | | They lost their case as I am married to a local and cannot be | extradited outside the EU." | praptak wrote: | Common knowledge from when Tor just started was to limit your | exit traffic to countries which cannot extradite you. And | definitely block your own country. | Sporktacular wrote: | So he as guns in his bedroom and 3 more guns in his safe along | with a machete (all apparently legal). Not in Mollenbeek or | northeastern Paris, but near Graz. | | Just your typical guy then. | | Running TOR exits are a noble thing to do but people like this | damage TOR's reputation. | | And while there doesn't seem to be proof he intentionally got | involved in CP, a smart pedophile probably would set up an exit | node just for plausible deniability. | hackinthebochs wrote: | Anyone actually viewing CP would likely have traces of it on | their computer. Just running an exit node isn't going to save | you. | Sporktacular wrote: | I'd imagine someone that savvy is familiar with encrypted VMs | etc. or maybe just hiding their computer. | teddyh wrote: | " _The law was changed a few weeks later to include private | persons and sole traders as protected lsps, not just companies, | but they had to convict me._ " | zer8k wrote: | > If convicted, this could land me in jail for 6 to 10 years. | | The 6 to 10 years is the least of his worries. The guy will be | labeled a chomo and probably killed as a result. All for | running a Tor exit node. What a time to be alive. | cge wrote: | This case was in Austria, not the US, and was quite some time | ago (early 2010s). He was charged under a law criminalizing | "support of general distribution", not possession. He was | sentenced to probation, and left the country. | pfannkuchen wrote: | I've never seen the term chomo before and I'm curious about | its origin. Is it "homo" but with 'c' for child tacked on the | front, or is it Spanish? Or something else, like a | portmanteau of child molester? | zer8k wrote: | The way I learned it is that it is a portmanteau of child | molester. The extra "o" in the middle is used because | "chmo" is hard to pronounce. | gmiller123456 wrote: | "Chimo" would make more sense in that case, so that's | probably not the origin of it. | jadamson wrote: | Yeah, I can't imagine anyone wanting slang to rhyme. | bigbillheck wrote: | Maybe English does have a little bit of vowel harmony | after all. | ziml77 wrote: | Would you also argue that mofo can't derive from | motherfucker because that would be mofu? | omeysalvi wrote: | Yes, the latter | evronm wrote: | It's short for "child molester," and happens to sound a lot | like "homo." Very common term in prison. | darkclouds wrote: | And innuendo and deniability is just as common a past | time. | | The UK's Carry On films and other TV programs like the | BBC Are you being served tv sitcom were heavily into | innuendo, in as much a way as some jokes in Disney Pixar | films fly over the head's of kids, but is understood by | most adults perfectly well. | | Not only is it a way to quantify peoples mental abilities | by whether they laugh in a cinema watched by a secret | camera and AI or whether documented on social media, or | listened into by our phones and then adverts, its also an | in plain site way for some people in society to identify | people for exploitation and manipulation, just like | teenagers are dedicated followers of fashion. | | Its quite interesting really, just like the changes in | slang language is a stealth form of working out the age | of someone typing online, by the use of their vocabulary | and interests. In some respects humans are just lemmings | and very people actually come up with original content, | not that the original content is necessarily any good. | | But mainstream trends happen for a reason, in much the | same way as you wont really see anything go viral like | they used to on the internet in the early 00's. | | Peoples reactions whether culturally or legally correct | or not are also telling. | | Its all psychological and biological mind games, because | histidine and carnosine as two amino acids, which could | get alot of males into trouble if they are not careful! | | I found the recent ambulance strikes in the UK quite | telling, they would attend cat 1 or level 1 people who | basically had an over active immune system ie allergic | reactions, but refused to attend to cat 2 or level 2 | people who had an under active immune system which groups | the elderly into that group automatically. In other words | the recent UK ambulance strikes were a stealth form of | eugenics on the elderly, but most of the british | population wouldnt have known this. | | And that is my point, there is alot more going on that | meets the eye, but if Freud was right, what does that | make many parents? | icecreamtoilet wrote: | It stands for child molester. The other term you hear all | the time inside is "weird" or "weirdo." There are others, | diaper sniper, skinner ("skin bief"). You generally won't | get killed though. People like to say that but in fed low, | where all the cp stuff goes, they're all protected and | they'll ship you out if you get caught hurting them. And | they WILL tell. | hattmall wrote: | Child porn, probably not getting killed but actual child | molesters is pretty common. | Ccecil wrote: | "Moes" for short also. | midasuni wrote: | In the U.K. they tend to be called nonces | | Always weird when you stumble into an encryption | conversation | delecti wrote: | A former coworker started a startup, and very nearly used | it in the name until he was informed of how the UK views | the word. | mptest wrote: | How did nonce get that meaning in the uk? I've always | known nonce to be a single use number | rolph wrote: | something like: | | Not Observing Normal Community Exercise | delecti wrote: | Seems it's unclear | https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/nonce#Etymology_2 | | > 1975. Unknown, derived from British criminal slang. | Several origins have been proposed; possibly derived from | dialectal nonce, nonse ("stupid, worthless individual") | (but this cannot be shown to predate nonce "child- | molester" and is likely a toned-down usage of the same | insult), or Nance, nance ("effeminate man, homosexual"), | from nancy or nancyboy. The rhyme with ponce has also | been noted. | | > As prison slang also said to be an acronym for "Not On | Normal Communal Exercise" (Stevens 2012), but this is | likely a backronym. | someweirdperson wrote: | > The other term you hear all the time inside is "weird" | or "weirdo." | | I'll have to request a user name change I guess. | hotpotamus wrote: | I remember it because SNL had a skit where The Rock | invented a "robo chomo"[0]. Given that SNL used it, I | thought it was a pretty mainstream term. | | [0]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0NgUhEs1R4 | pessimizer wrote: | > probably killed as a result | | This is a violent fantasy. I'd estimate that 99.9% of child | molesters who go to prison walk out alive and relatively | uninjured. | tamimio wrote: | It wasn't in the US, and it was for him either 3 months jail | or probation for some years, he was also able to leave Europe | completely, most likely because they know he had nothing to | do with it but per the article there was no plea. | kedean wrote: | On the other hand, his picture and actual name appear in | articles like this one that will show up in a background | search. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-07-23 23:00 UTC)