[HN Gopher] SpaceX punched a hole in the ionosphere ___________________________________________________________________ SpaceX punched a hole in the ionosphere Author : wawayanda Score : 33 points Date : 2023-07-28 21:50 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (spaceweatherarchive.com) (TXT) w3m dump (spaceweatherarchive.com) | zgluck wrote: | So now they'll also have to deal with "preserve the ionosphere" | activists who have no fscking clue. | perihelions wrote: | Related thread, | | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33762492 ( _" North Korean | ICBM launch detected using GPS"_) | user6723 wrote: | [flagged] | [deleted] | latchkey wrote: | I saw the launch from southern california. My first ever seeing a | rocket go up. It was pretty amazing to watch the thing streak | across the sky. Sadly, missed the red glow though. | esquivalience wrote: | Seems like this isn't considered to be a big issue, beyond that | it is a very visible thing that instinctively 'feels' like a bad | idea. | | > Rocket engines spray water (H2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) into | the ionosphere, quenching local ionization by as much as 70%. A | complicated series of charge exchange reactions between oxygen | ions (O+) and molecules from the rocket exhaust produce photons | at a wavelength of 6300 A-the same color as red auroras. | | > Once rare, ionospheric "punch holes" are increasingly common | with record numbers of rocket launches led by SpaceX sending | Starlink satellites to low-Earth orbit. Ham radio operators may | notice them... These effects may be troublesome, but they are | shortlived; re-ionization occurs as soon as the sun comes up | again. | KRAKRISMOTT wrote: | Will excess radiation leak through to Earth during re- | ionization? | [deleted] | dfox wrote: | Only insignificantly. Most of the radiation is | filtered/diverted by the magnetosphere. The only really | practical effect of the disturbance is making the already | hard to predict sky-wave propagation of HF even more harder | to predict and characterize. Which is today realistically of | an interest to HAMs and mostly as an fallback for | intelligence agencies and diplomatic services. | perihelions wrote: | Don't believe the ionosphere has any role in any sort of | radiation absorption, outside of RF? | Jeff_Brown wrote: | If the holes are quickly healed by sunlight, and only local | to where a satellite is launched, the answer would seem to be | no. | nbltanx wrote: | Starlink plans to deploy 12,000 - 42,000 satellites. What if two | competitors want to do the same? Can the low earth orbit handle | 150,000 satellites that turn into space debris at some point? | Armisael16 wrote: | Yes. | panick21_ wrote: | The waste, waste majority of sats never turn into space debris. | Every single sat that launches today in the West has a deorbit | planned. The only sat that turn into space debris will be those | that brake unexpectitly and totally unrecoverable. | | And the Starlink sats are so low that they dont really turn | very meaningful debris ever. | | And in general, yes LEO can handle millions of sats. | | We have like 150k cars in a single tiny country on earth right | now. | wyldfire wrote: | Freudian slip. | 3cats-in-a-coat wrote: | Cars don't constantly move thousands miles an hour | uncontrollably | Jeff_Brown wrote: | Is that right? Scientific American seemed to think it could | be a problem in 2019[1]. Space.com says Starlink satellites | orbit at an altitude of about 342 miles (550 kilometers)[2]. | And the Wikipedia article on Kessler Syndrome[3] (which is a | chain reaction of satellite debris) mentions an incident at | 555km that was problematic: | | "In 1985, the first anti-satellite (ASAT) missile was used in | the destruction of a satellite. The American 1985 ASM-135 | ASAT test was carried out, in which the Solwind P78-1 | satellite flying at an altitude of 555 kilometres was struck | by the 14-kilogram payload at a velocity of 24,000 kilometres | per hour (15,000 mph; 6.7 km/s). When NASA learned of U.S. | Air Force plans for the Solwind ASAT test, they modeled the | effects of the test and determined that debris produced by | the collision would still be in orbit late into the 1990s. It | would force NASA to enhance debris shielding for its planned | space station." | | [1] https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/spacexs- | starlink-... | | [2] https://www.space.com/spacex-starlink-satellites.html | | [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kessler_syndrome ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-07-28 23:00 UTC)