[HN Gopher] Pegasus Mail ___________________________________________________________________ Pegasus Mail Author : danielovichdk Score : 170 points Date : 2023-08-03 16:28 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.pmail.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.pmail.com) | ElCapitanMarkla wrote: | It's pretty special seeing something created in Dunedin, NZ on | here | jsight wrote: | I loved Pegasus back in the day. I'm happy to see this recent | wave of nostalgia here. | robertheadley wrote: | Pegasus Mail was actually the first email client I used, followed | by Eudora. | srvmshr wrote: | For me Eudora was the first client I installed. They had a | unicorn logo & even came as a Lite edition. Fun times those | were, in early 2000s (along with ICQ, ACDSee32, & Quake3) | | https://computerhistory.org/blog/the-eudora-email-client-sou... | bluedino wrote: | First job we had a whole school district running Pegasus. | | Well, about half did. The rest use the mail client in Netscape | Navigator or Internet Explorer. Was it called Outlook Express | yet? | | No air conditioning anywhere, almost everyone on dial-up...ugh | ChrisArchitect wrote: | What's new here? Are they shutting down? | | Some discussion about their 30-year anniversary in 2020: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21975087 | danielovichdk wrote: | I posted it because of the netscape meteor thread, and the | Pegasus logo hit me as one of my favourites in 90s. And it | likewise a great mail client I used for some time. | smcl wrote: | Perfectly good reason, in my opinion! Seeing this brought | back memories of reading PC Zone back in late '90s, one issue | in particular which had a special on "Getting Online" where | they laid out various browsers, email clients, (UK) ISPs, | gaming services etc. | teruakohatu wrote: | Earlier this year they released a new beta with better OAUTH2 | support for Gmail users. | submeta wrote: | I fondly used Eudora Mail back in the 90s and absolutely loved | it. I tried Pegasus Mail as well, but it simply didn't resonate | with me. | soufron wrote: | Eudora was too resource heavy for some machines. That's where | pegasus shined. | slavapestov wrote: | The older Mac versions of Eudora were pretty lightweight. You | could even run it on a Mac Plus with MacIP over LocalTalk. | CrankyBear wrote: | It was a great e-mail client in its day and it's still useable | today. | pizzaknife wrote: | my favorite part of this read comes early on (ahem, clears | throat): "I'm not going to spend too long" ~ proceeds to | introduce "The Sales Pitch" for several paragraphs <3 in any | case, im sold, will check this out next hackathon | ary wrote: | Since I couldn't find any screenshots on their website and I | wanted to recall what it was like (having used it for a time) | this is the best I could find. | | http://campus.bethlehem.edu/centers/computer_center/Pegasus_... | | There is almost a "brutalist" clarity to Windows 95 user | interfaces that I miss. | jszymborski wrote: | I first heard about Pegasus Mail on ScreenSavers with Leo | Laporte. Someone wrote in and Steve Gibson suggested it. Fond | memories! | Lammy wrote: | I'm a big fan of Becky! Internet Mail which has a similarly | oldschool aesthetic: http://www.rimarts.co.jp/becky.htm | soufron wrote: | I used Pegasus on my 486sx25 on windows 3.11. It worked like a | charm. I am glad it's still active. | fullstop wrote: | I ran Pegasus until I switched to Linux and used XFMail [1]. It | was a great client, and my parents continued to use it until they | eventually switched to Thunderbird. | | I eventually gave up on imap / pop3 clients and strictly use | webmail today. | | 1. https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/XFmail | soufron wrote: | Why do you use webmail? I don't get the point. | fullstop wrote: | There's no client setup and I can access it from just about | anywhere. | jpeeler wrote: | I used to optimize for the same scenario. But I realized | that I very rarely use random machines that aren't my own. | Plus my habits shifted even further once I started relying | on my own (intentionally) private services accessible over | Tailscale. These days I'm uncomfortable logging into | anything of importance on a public machine without using a | one time password or at least dual factor authentication, | which isn't always possible. | mscccc wrote: | I love how the homepage loads in 24ms. Now this is the ideal | website. | hipsterstal1n wrote: | This is peak performance. | ptx wrote: | I wish it had some screenshots though, which would slightly | increase time to onload, although it shouldn't delay loading of | the text content. | noizejoy wrote: | Here you go: | | https://duckduckgo.com/?q=pegasus+mail+screen+captures&iax=i. | .. | hdivider wrote: | Exactly. Wish more sites and other bits of software followed | this website's philosophy. Once you have that which is | sufficient, anything more is waste. | olavfosse wrote: | unreadable on mobile is not sufficient | gsich wrote: | Desktop software. Also it's not unreadable. | qwertox wrote: | While I did use it maybe 25 years ago, I wanted to see some | screenshots to get reminded of what it looks like. No | screenshots. Maybe the manual? No pdf to download. | | The site leaves a lot to be desired, but it loads fast. | _Parfait_ wrote: | Ah the old nerds pretending UI just doesn't matter. | Exoristos wrote: | I don't know what you're talking about. That's a beautiful, | clean, and clearly-organized site. | Narishma wrote: | UI matters, that's why we're praising it. | gspencley wrote: | I think that's an unfair strawman, because they are saying | that UI _does_ matter, only that their opinion of "modern | UIs" is that they are often worse, not better. | | Someone mentioned an "in between" option and that's where I | personally tend to land as well. A lot of modern websites are | so media and JavaScript heavy that they take a long time to | load, have many layout shifts and feel sluggish when you use | and navigate them. That is not good user experience. | | On the flip side, I think there is a lot to say for | "responsiveness", font choices and media that helps the user | experience. I am a minimalist, but legibility of copy and | making intelligent layout decisions relative to the viewport | size are "modern" techniques that can greatly aid UX when | understood and applied properly. | folkrav wrote: | I feel like there's an in-between we're not talking about, that | would look a bit less like a shareware site from the early 00s, | used more than 30% of my screen, and would work on my phone, | but isn't the modern mess of megabytes of JS bundles for a | static landing page. It could load in 35-50ms, too, I wouldn't | mind. | washadjeffmad wrote: | "Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to | add, but nothing left to take away." | | I value negative space in the same way that my dream is not | to pile my plate with as much as I can at a buffet. | renewiltord wrote: | k's wky ns sllr n rs | djbusby wrote: | How did you do that? | qmarchi wrote: | Unicode tricks. A quick Google search for "small text | generator" will point you in the right direction. | Sabinus wrote: | H[?][?][?][?][?][?][?]i[?][?][?][?]s[?][?] [?]a[?][?]r[?] | r[?][?][?][?]i[?][?][?][?][?][?]v[?][?][?][?][?][?]al[?][ | ?][?][?][?][?] [?][?]w[?][?]a[?][?]s[?] [?]fo[?][?]r[?][? | ][?][?]t[?][?][?]o[?][?][?]l[?]d[?][?][?][?][?][?].[?][?] | [?] [?][?][?]H[?][?]e [?]c[?][?][?][?][?]o[?][?][?][?][?] | [?]m[?][?]e[?][?]s[?][?].[?][?][?][?][?][?][?] [?][?][?] | thfuran wrote: | That's nice, but I value text that renders at a legible | size more than I value leaving the majority of my screen | empty. This layout isn't effectively using negative space, | it's just wasting the entire screen. At least on mobile. | drivers99 wrote: | On mobile I just use two thumbs to zoom in to the column | I want to read. | libraryatnight wrote: | Blatant ableism against the mono-thumbed or thumbless. | toomim wrote: | The mono-thumbed can always double-tap the desired | column, and thumbless folx can use their nose. | thesuitonym wrote: | Why does it need to take up more than 30% of your screen? And | what's wrong with your phone? It works perfectly fine on | mine. | scblock wrote: | Legibility and usability. Like many old sites this one uses | small fonts, small elements, and has tiny targets. | Especially when working on a large display. I make liberal | use of Firefox's zoom feature to compensate, but better | defaults don't hurt. | | And yes it works on a phone as you can easily zoom in, but | inclusion of responsive design, e.g. moving the sidebar to | a footer, and use larger fonts would significantly improve | legibility and usability. This is not incompatible with a | simple and fast-loading site. | indymike wrote: | If you are looking for Pegasus mail on a mobile device, I | think you might be a wee bit outside of the target market. | And btw, Pegasus is a shareware site from the 1990s. | nathell wrote: | A lot of sites from https://512kb.club/ are like that. | sandyarmstrong wrote: | But...tables!!! | alfalfasprout wrote: | This. It's refreshing to use a website that doesn't need to run | an obscene amount of JS everywhere. | fsflover wrote: | https://www.pmail.com/sundry/pmlinux.htm | | > 2005 | | > I am now favourably disposed to the idea of moving towards Open | Source, but have to overcome some important issues before I go | down that track. I am actively considering the issues and hope I | can find workable solutions (such as a large, friendly, wealthy | sponsor) in the not-too-distant future. | | > 2021 | | > there simply isn't a way forward with this idea, however | admirable it may be and however inclined I might be to undertake | it. The reality is that the programs are now so big and my | resources so limited, that it simply isn't feasible for me to | consider a true open source migration without specific, | guaranteed funding and a strong, dedicated team of highly-skilled | developer volunteers. | | This is very sad. | Agingcoder wrote: | I loved it - I used to run it in the 90s. | rolph wrote: | Pegasus Mail and Linux / Open Source | | https://www.pmail.com/sundry/pmlinux.htm | | David Harris Owner/Author, Pegasus Mail and Mercury Systems, | April 20th 2005. | djbusby wrote: | This was my first email program back in the 90s. Like others, | there was a Novell Netware involved. Fond memories that I had | forgotten until I was sitting outside my house in | Ballard(Seattle) and the neighbor was walking the dog. Spent a | lot of time sniffing my trees/bushes. | | Neighbor said: don't mind, she's just gotta check her pee-mail. | | I'm sure they were confused when I fell out laughing for 5+ | minutes. | layer8 wrote: | A similar desktop email client for Windows is The Bat! [0]. Does | anyone have experience with both and can provide a comparison? | | [0] https://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/ | fellowniusmonk wrote: | Haven't used either in 15 years, but I always preferred the | bat! back in the day, client was faster and was bullet proof, | also at the time it did a better job handling vCards. Both had | irregularities with rich format rendering, but that was a | symptom of the time and the fragmented closed sourced rendering | engines. | | I moved to Opera's M2 client as soon as it became available and | it was my preference even though it only supported plaintext. | laxmin wrote: | The Bat, Pegasus and the Becky were three favourite clients at | our University. | | Till GMail and the browser based email thing took over. I wonder | if we will be remembering gmail and the browser clients with such | fondness a few years from now. | baz00 wrote: | Surprised that's still around. Had a fairly large airgapped | Pegasus deployment (1000 seats) on Netware back in 1998. | dahwolf wrote: | In 1996, our school had a break room with 30 DOS-based computers | running Pegasus. Each computer would typically have a queue of | 3-4 people behind the current user, all eager to check their | mail. Most had no internet at home or very limited/expensive | access. | | Me and some friends were into programming. We would exit Pegasus | to return back to the DOS prompt, and then write simple programs | that persist in memory, so basically running in the background. | Next, we'd reopen Pegasus and left the station. | | The next in line would log in to their email and be busy with it | for some 5 minutes after which our program would activate. It | would draw random pixels on screen, mirror the entire screen | vertically, output random tones on the beeper, all kinds of weird | stuff to suggest that the machine is possessed. | | We'd be hiding behind some column observing it and laughing. | | Pretty pathetic, but good times. | stanmancan wrote: | In high school we found we could use netsend to send messages | to other computers; or every computer on the network at once. | The rest of the school year was a back and forward where the | sysadmins would try to block us and we would find ways around | it. I think the final method that worked was writing vbscript | macros inside Excel. | s0rce wrote: | I was in college in 2004 and for the engineering department | email you had to log into a linux terminal and check your email | with Pine. Most students by that time had windows computers | with internet at home/dorm, I feel like it was intentionally | difficult. | david_p wrote: | Did we study in the same university? | | I was studying at a French engineering university and had | that exact experience. | | I loved learning all the weird command line tricks and Pine | shortcuts :) | postmodest wrote: | By that time I had Pegasus mail for windows in my work | computer. I miss it sometimes. | Bloating wrote: | My favorite gag-app would slowly drip letters off the screen | annoyingnoob wrote: | Wow, I feel old. I implemented Pegasus mail way back in 1993 or | 1994, had forgotten about it since. | dang wrote: | Related: | | _Pegasus Mail Newsflashes_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31413891 - May 2022 (3 | comments) | | _Pegasus Mail, 30 Years On_ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21975087 - Jan 2020 (46 | comments) | | _Pegasus Mail_ - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14144731 - | April 2017 (49 comments) | | _Pegasus Mail: Twenty years and counting..._ - | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2115730 - Jan 2011 (12 | comments) | jjbinx007 wrote: | We used to run Pegasus back when we had a Novel Netware server | and it was brilliant. We later used Mercury Mail to host our own | mail server on a regular desktop PC running Windows XP connected | directly to the internet and offered staff a choice between | Pegasus mail or Squirrelmail. | | We eventually moved over to Gmail but I have fond memories of | Pegasus mail in particular. A great piece of software made with a | lot of love from the author. | ubermonkey wrote: | Pegasus was, in the early 1990s, the first email system I used | on microcomputers (and yes, with Netware). Prior to that, my | email was on the university mainframe. | | Good times! Before Eternal September! | majke wrote: | What a blast from the past. I remember using pegasus back in the | days. I loved it, not sure why I stopped using it. I guess gmail | search function? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-08-03 23:00 UTC)