[HN Gopher] Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Stu...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
        
       Author : riveducha
       Score  : 56 points
       Date   : 2023-08-05 18:41 UTC (4 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.riveducha.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.riveducha.com)
        
       | aurizon wrote:
       | That 'snap' is the arc and the voltage = zero until it gets going
       | again - repeat. This is common on old monitors as dust builds up
       | and often a fix can be done by a careful cleaning plus
       | application of 'corona dope' along spark paths. Turn it on in a
       | dark room and watch/listen for the spark. Dope that path and
       | alternate paths and dry with hair dryer. Test. There are
       | universal repair flybacks - select what seems to fit. Usually the
       | existing controller will serve - computer monitors are far
       | smaller than most TV's of that era. Hardest thing is finding new
       | old stock. To save the nation new flybacks can be wound - complex
       | but doable. Hardest problem is adapting the space and circuit.
       | The flyback can be wired point to point with hookup wire. Only
       | the HV wire needs to be HV wire. Then you can zip tie the flyback
       | in whatever space and dress the HV with respect.
        
       | ivraatiems wrote:
       | I have a fully functional third-gen iMac (the "jelly bean") that
       | needed its inner bezel replaced. Sourcing a non-broken bezel was
       | one big job, but even after I did, finding someone with the
       | knowledge and skill to repair it safely was a task. I wasn't
       | willing to do the repair myself, it's just too dangerous for an
       | amateur. These machines are supposed to have components that
       | automatically discharge the screen after they're removed from
       | wall power, but on a 20+ year old machine, no way to know whether
       | that was working. You have to touch the screen and fasten it to
       | the inner bezel, so repairing it without proper discharge was a
       | non-starter.
       | 
       | I called around to various TV repair shops and was generally told
       | they couldn't do it, or that it'd be prohibitively expensive.
       | Finally, an electronics surplus store in my area referred me to a
       | gentleman of the old-school AV hippy variety who knew how to
       | repair all sorts of old equipment. He was able to construct a
       | tool to ground the machine while working on it and we did the
       | repair successfully together. It was an adventure!
        
       | Scoundreller wrote:
       | > The focus knobs should be tuned so that the screen image is
       | sharp. I don't really have a good set of steps for this, so just
       | play around with them until the monitor is as sharp as can be.
       | 
       | This explains my methodology for a lot of things in life
        
         | nyanpasu64 wrote:
         | I haven't tried focusing a CRT with two focus knobs (horizontal
         | and vertical?), but from my general experience with focusing a
         | CRT oscilloscope and tuning VGA signal sharpness on CRT and
         | LCD, one good way to focus is to create three B&W images of
         | vertical stripes, horizontal stripes, and a checkerboard. When
         | showing the vertical stripe image, tune horizontal focus until
         | as much of the screen as possible is in-focus. Then repeat with
         | the horizontal stripe image and vertical focus, then double-
         | check on a checkerboard and regular desktop usage.
        
       | vondur wrote:
       | We had a bunch of these monitors back in the day, don't remember
       | any of them dying early. I was always afraid of taking apart CRTs
       | thanks to those transformers in them. People used to overclock
       | monitors back in the day to increase the refresh frequency.
        
         | mhb wrote:
         | The capacitors are the things to be concerned about.
        
       | wkat4242 wrote:
       | Nice job and write-up.
       | 
       | As the author says CRTs are dangerous. Even when they're off they
       | can still carry insanely high voltages. The flyback transformer
       | is one of the more dangerous components of them.
       | 
       | I'm great at electronics repair and I tend to avoid them. Luckily
       | these days that's easy :)
       | 
       | If you don't know what you're doing, you shouldn't attempt it.
       | Just get a more technical friend to do it.
       | 
       | If you do know what you're doing you probably wouldn't need this
       | guide in the first place :)
        
         | glhaynes wrote:
         | I've never worked inside a CRT (but may need to soon) and am
         | _not_ great at electronics repair, but I 'm a little surprised
         | you describe yourself as having a lot of skill but still tend
         | to avoid them. From my understanding, it's straightforward to
         | reliably discharge them and make them safe to work on. Do you
         | think it's easier to get this wrong than I've understood or do
         | you just feel uneasy about it in general? Just curious!
        
           | rasz wrote:
           | Im an EE that never worked on CRT and declined plenty of
           | requests. I also like to think Im quite mechanically
           | inclined, but I would _never_ go anywhere close to a split
           | rim being serviced. There are things just not worth the risk
           | in life, like jumping head down into unknown stream, or
           | skating down handrails.
        
           | toast0 wrote:
           | One problem is there are a lot of adjustments that are really
           | best made while the CRT is on. Another problem is CRT circuit
           | boards experience a lot of heat, so repair work can be
           | frustrating; it's hard to replace components and what not
           | when traces have lifted.
        
           | wkat4242 wrote:
           | It's just the risk. Most components in a modern TV are very
           | safe to work on. Even the PSU is not that bad. CCFL backlight
           | had voltages only in the hundreds of volts, and modern LED
           | backlight is even lower. A CRT is totally different business.
           | The author of the article pointed out another thing, wire
           | insulation properties at such high voltages.
           | 
           | There's just a lot to consider, and extremely high voltage
           | stuff isn't really my area. I tend to do more low voltage
           | stuff. When things go wrong with high voltage they tend to go
           | wrong pretty spectacularly, and can cause serious bodily harm
           | too. I just prefer not to take the risk. I'm similarly
           | cautious with Li-ion and Li-Po battery charging circuitry. I
           | don't like to mess around with those and if I repair them
           | it's purely a like-for-like repair.
           | 
           | Another thing is that when I started with electronics CRTs
           | were still very common and I wasn't skilled then, as such I
           | had a lot of respect for them and a lot of caution. As my
           | skills grew, CRTs became obsolete so I never really got
           | comfortable with them and the apprehensive feeling remained.
           | 
           | But I think I have skills with electronics yes, I repair a
           | lot of electronics, designed some of my own and I also built
           | and modded some radios, and came up with some of my own mods
           | (I have a ham license too).
        
         | sneak wrote:
         | Yeah, this webpage really should have a big prominent warning
         | label at the top.
         | 
         | The flyback transformer can fucking kill you, and anyone who
         | needs this webpage or is interested in the instructions (ie
         | someone not working professionally in electronics repair and
         | aware of such hazards) is less likely to know that.
        
         | amelius wrote:
         | I've always wondered why modern multimeters don't have a
         | "discharge" option.
         | 
         | I.e., you select the discharge mode, put the probes on a
         | capacitor, and watch the voltage go down, while an internal
         | current limiter makes sure that it happens at a safe rate.
        
           | nickt wrote:
           | The probes aren't big enough. That's why it's often a big
           | screwdriver and jump lead to earth.
           | 
           | The better option is the Fluke 80K 40.
           | 
           | https://www.fluke.com/en-
           | us/product/accessories/probes/fluke...
        
             | Dylan16807 wrote:
             | Not big enough in what way? A normal probe should be able
             | to handle the distancing and the small current fine. Maybe
             | it would lack insulation but I wouldn't use the word "big"
             | for level of insulation.
        
               | kens wrote:
               | Typical probes are rated for 600 volts (CAT III), so
               | you'd have insulation rated for 600 volts between your
               | fingers and 30,000 volts, which is kind of hazardous.
               | 
               | Here's a recent Twitter video showing what happens when
               | you combine a flyback transformer and faulty insulation:
               | https://twitter.com/zh1nu/status/1673487720780529664
        
           | tgsovlerkhgsel wrote:
           | For lower voltages, some do ("low impedance measurement" or
           | LoZ). Not specifically meant for discharging capacitors but
           | should work for that too.
           | 
           | But this only works up to the voltage the multimeter is rated
           | for (i.e. usually 300 or 600 V). If you wanted to make it
           | safe to put 30 kV across the multimeter, it'd have to be
           | designed with sufficient insulation etc. for that.
        
           | formerly_proven wrote:
           | An electrician's voltage tester (the not-fake ones) can be
           | used for this, for off-line filter caps anyway. 30 kV, not so
           | much.
        
         | the_third_wave wrote:
         | Ah, electronics hobbyists these days... I repaired my first TV
         | at 16yo, it was a Nordmende B&W set with a resistor directly on
         | the output of the flyback transformer. That resistor was broken
         | which led to a nice corona discharge lighting up the inside of
         | the set, looking at it was like looking at the set of a 30's
         | Frankenstein movie. This set me up for a 'career' of repairing
         | televisions and (later) monitors while at university where I
         | came across all sorts of interesting light/sound/smoke effects
         | from those 35kV flyback transformers with cascade circuits
         | (called 'tripplers' since they were used to raise the output
         | voltage) on large-tube sets.
         | 
         | I never got zapped which is a good thing since yes, that can be
         | unpleasant and - depending on when and where it happens -
         | dangerous. Discharge those tubes and cascades before you fiddle
         | with them, use a screwdriver connected to a ground wire which
         | is connected to the metal tube frame. If you want to do it
         | 'professionally' you'll want to put a HT resistor in that wire,
         | otherwise just zap the thing by sticking the screwdriver under
         | the plastic cap on the high tension connector at the tube.
        
       | dougg3 wrote:
       | Thanks for sharing! I had a brand new one of these displays in
       | 1999 when they first came out and it developed the same problem a
       | year later. The replacement from MacMall's warranty company
       | (which was graphite instead of blue) also eventually developed
       | the issue too. Good to know there's a solution if I ever decide
       | to fix it.
       | 
       | I think Apple should have recalled these.
        
         | riveducha wrote:
         | The 21" version was supposed to be solid but I have never seen
         | anyone with one or seen it for sale. The price tag was probably
         | too steep compared to the faulty 17" one. Sad to hear that the
         | graphite model was just as bad though.
        
       | metadat wrote:
       | I love this kind hardcore repair hacking to keep hardware going.
       | There is no logical reason to spend time on this, yet someone
       | did. Big respect to the author, you are inspiring!
        
       | veave wrote:
       | I find your accent soothing.
        
       | andyjohnson0 wrote:
       | From what I understand of this, the danger comes from charge
       | stored in large capacitors. So what is the longest that these
       | capacitors can hold a significant charge if the crt is left
       | disconnected from mains power? Hours/days/weeks? Is simply
       | waiting long enough a reliable way to render a crt safe to work
       | on?
       | 
       | (Irrespective of the answer to this, there is no chance at all
       | that I would ever mess with crt circuitry. But I am curious.)
        
         | ComputerGuru wrote:
         | I got a really nasty shock from a capacitor in a flash (as in
         | camera) that was powered down for weeks, back in the 90s.
        
       | fragmede wrote:
       | The sad reality of externality-removed capitalism is why would
       | you do that? In our disposable economy, a new monitor can be had
       | for _cheap_. Repairing things is for the poor or nerdy. which I
       | resemble the latter pay. Incentivizing fixing things, rather than
       | buying a new shiny flashy thing is not a thing that we do well.
       | Oh well. Hopefully room temperature superconductors and solar and
       | batteries can lead is to a place of victory for the environment
       | in place of coal.
        
         | jrmg wrote:
         | Even with the externalities accounted for, if you must use a
         | monitor, it might be better to buy a new one than repair the
         | old one.
         | 
         | The replacement parts have a footprint, and a newer monitor
         | might use so much less power in operation that it's more
         | efficient to make and use it than to continue to use the older
         | CRT.
         | 
         | I really wish there were an easy way to work out if this was
         | where the 'efficiency crossover happens in X years of use'
         | point was. For example, I have a perfectly usable Thunderbolt 1
         | [edit: Thunderbolt 1 _dock_ ] that meets my needs. But it uses
         | 5-10W of power more than a new Thunderbolt 3 or 4 one would.
         | Should I continue to use it or switch to a newer one?
        
           | JonathonW wrote:
           | It'll depend on your usage pattern and local cost of
           | electricity-- if you're running that device that uses 10W
           | more power 24/7, that works out to 87.6 kWh of additional
           | power usage over the course of a year, or about $15 at the
           | current average cost of electricity in the US ($0.17/kWh as
           | of June 2023). If that's a monitor, you'd have to run it for
           | a pretty long time before your break-even point on purchase
           | cost alone (10+ years on a lower-end monitor, and probably
           | not in your lifetime on something from Apple).
           | 
           | If your usage isn't continuous (which it probably isn't),
           | that'll reduce your electricity cost and extend your break-
           | even point even further; if electricity costs more in your
           | region, it'll shorten it (average EU energy prices are around
           | double that of the US IIRC, and some countries are much
           | higher). But it's still going to take a while to break even
           | if the efficiency improvements you're considering are in the
           | 5-10W ballpark; that's not all that much power in the grand
           | scheme of things.
        
             | xur17 wrote:
             | A rule of thumb I've always used is that 100W for a month
             | costs roughly $10.
        
         | toast0 wrote:
         | A new monitor can be had for cheap, yes. But a new CRT monitor
         | cannot be had for cheap. If you have reason to prefer a CRT,
         | repairing a monitor you have is probably the least cost option
         | towards getting a working CRT.
         | 
         | Many people don't have reason to prefer a CRT, and that's fine
         | too. Lots of non-CRT options out there to use.
        
       | Hizonner wrote:
       | > Opening up CRTs is dangerous. Do this at your own risk.
       | Considering hiring a professional instead.
       | 
       | Hire a professional.
       | 
       | To fix a quarter-century-old monitor that was nothing special
       | when it was new.
       | 
       | Why? I mean, I wouldn't bother fixing the thing anyway, but
       | hiring somebody is going to cost you more than a much better
       | brand new monitor.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-05 23:00 UTC)