[HN Gopher] Turns out lowly thymus may be saving your life
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Turns out lowly thymus may be saving your life
        
       Author : birriel
       Score  : 79 points
       Date   : 2023-08-10 19:07 UTC (3 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (news.harvard.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (news.harvard.edu)
        
       | stefantalpalaru wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | gadflyinyoureye wrote:
       | What are the chances that I'd see two things about the thymus in
       | a week? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVoxfABoHh4&t=2s
       | 
       | This covers a paper that, while small in sample size, shows a
       | reduction in age of 6 years. One of the major impacts of the drug
       | cocktail is that it removes much of the fat that accumulates in
       | the thymus as one ages.
        
         | autokad wrote:
         | I was wondering that. what about people who have less fat? what
         | if we stop it from fattening? etc. good video
        
       | spandrew wrote:
       | This type article declaring a thymus revelation is published
       | every few years.
       | 
       | We've known the thymus is saving our lives -- it's where the t in
       | t-Cells derives from for years. There are very old studies of
       | removing it from older humans and statistically seeing a decline
       | in health. Most doctors will not remove it without a decent cause
       | in older patients (intractable infection, for example). In those
       | cases it's not that removing the thymus was a good approach. It
       | was just the least-bad approach the physician had on hand to help
       | their patient.
       | 
       | Never forget that everything we do, medically, is a stall. I'm
       | glad we have blood pressure pills and better health spans than
       | our grandparents. Eat a healthy diet, run 3 times a week, manage
       | stress and... die anyway. That's the deal we were given as living
       | things.
        
         | xixo wrote:
         | I wish I could say my dad's thymus is saving his life, quite
         | the opposite. He was discharged from the ICU/hospital yesterday
         | after he nearly died from a "myasthenic crisis"--an event that
         | most people with Myasthenia Gravis (MG) will experience. From
         | what I understand, his thymus produces antibodies that destroys
         | receptors connecting the nerves and muscles. He can't keep his
         | head up, eyelids up, can't swallow and during the crisis could
         | not breathe.
         | 
         | Interestingly, a small portion of MG patients have an
         | enlarged/tumorous thymus and end up getting it removed, though
         | there aren't necessarily clear benefits. It's also a quite
         | invasive procedure they wouldn't perform on older folks like my
         | dad (he shows no signs of it anyway).
         | 
         | Overall I agree with you though--this article is not saying
         | anything new. As a concerned son who's spent more than his fair
         | share of time trying to understand what's going on here, I wish
         | it did. I also wish there were some treatments for my dad that
         | worked. For now, exercising, eating healthy, lowering stress,
         | and a healthy dose of steroids are currently keeping him with
         | us. If anyone has advice, I'm all ears.
        
           | [deleted]
        
       | Calavar wrote:
       | This is a fluff piece. We've known for decades that the thymus is
       | an important part of the immune system. It's not an organ that's
       | been believed to be vestigial, like the appendix.
       | 
       | > For the study, Kooshesh mined data from 1,146 adult patients
       | who had undergone thymus removal, alongside demographically
       | matched control patients who had undergone similar surgeries but
       | kept their thymus
       | 
       | Sure, you can demographically match all you want, but I don't
       | think this is a research question that can be answered with a
       | retrospective analysis. The problem is that you haven't
       | controlled for _why_ surgeons decided to remove the thymus in
       | some cases and not in others. Was the disease more severe in
       | patients who got thymectomies? Was it differences in training
       | between the surgeons? Was it just an arbitrary decision on the
       | part of the surgeons? This is a critical confounder regardless of
       | whether you 've matched the demographics. You really need a
       | randomized control study to answer this sort of question.
       | 
       | > Although the risk of autoimmune disease did not differ
       | substantially between the groups in the overall primary cohort
       | (relative risk, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.4), a difference was found
       | when patients with preoperative infection, cancer, or autoimmune
       | disease were excluded from the analysis (12.3% vs. 7.9%; relative
       | risk, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.2)
       | 
       | What? What is this? Was this subgroup analysis preregistered, or
       | did they just go fishing when their primary hypothesis didn't pan
       | out?
       | 
       | I'd categorize this study as mildly interesting, but not
       | groundbreaking the way the press statement is selling it.
        
         | anon84873628 wrote:
         | Well, if the study had found no significant correlation, that
         | would have been interesting information. I'll still applaud the
         | researchers on this one.
        
         | joe__f wrote:
         | I believe that the appendix is now understood to be a store for
         | gut flora so that the microbiome can regrow after an infection
         | or bad episode of diarrhoea etc.
        
           | runnerup wrote:
           | I believe it's only posited to be useful for isolated small
           | groups where everyone might get the same stomach bug at the
           | same time, and have no other humans around with a healthy gut
           | biome to "re-infect" them. Which explains why in dense modern
           | society we couldn't find a difference that the appendix
           | makes, because we get reinfected with healthy microbiome from
           | sharing germs with all the other humans in our big cities -
           | some of whom didn't just get a terrible stomach bug at the
           | same time as us.
        
           | bookmark1231 wrote:
           | It's been conjectured by some researchers that maybe this is
           | the case, particularly for infants. But there's very little
           | evidence for it. As far as I'm aware there have been no
           | studies that are able to statistically distinguish between
           | people with and without an appendix in terms of actual heath
           | outcomes
        
             | delfinom wrote:
             | Otoh, I wouldn't say that dismisses the appendix having a
             | potential role. Part of the problem is we barely have a
             | grasp on gut flora and it's full impact on human health,
             | and several studies show that impact can be over years
             | including potentially being one cause of dementia.
        
         | contravariant wrote:
         | I take it a relative risk of 1 is a null result?
         | 
         | If so a confidence interval of 1.02 to 2.2 _after_ arbitrarily
         | excluding some data is not exactly ground breaking.
        
           | nerdponx wrote:
           | It's suggestive of p-hacking. "Look, the bottom of the
           | interval is just above 1! Finally I can publish this."
        
         | mlyle wrote:
         | This is a research question you can't answer with a prospective
         | analysis either, because it's not ethical in most cases to
         | randomize whether you're removing a body part.
         | 
         | The best we're going to do is a careful case control study (and
         | research in animal models). And the evidence is enough to imply
         | strongly that we should expend a little more effort to avoid
         | removing the thymus.
        
           | Calavar wrote:
           | > This is a research question you can't answer with a
           | prospective analysis either, because it's not ethical to
           | randomize whether you're removing a body part.
           | 
           | But that's exactly what we did with the appendix, multiple
           | times [1, 2].
           | 
           | [1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26080338/
           | 
           | [2] https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa2014320
        
             | mlyle wrote:
             | I had thought about this and had amended this to "in most
             | cases" before you posted.
             | 
             | If the standard of care is removing the appendix, and you
             | have a strong reason to believe that something less may be
             | superior, you may be able to conduct a randomized trial.
             | 
             | But any other combination of facts is going to be hard for
             | an IRB to swallow.
        
         | jjtheblunt wrote:
         | Isn't the universally known T cell named with a T because of
         | the thymus which imparts their programming? Like known for
         | decades?
        
           | readthenotes1 wrote:
           | More now, since I was a part of the other universe that
           | didn't know this!
        
           | anon84873628 wrote:
           | Yes, but some believed this function was most relevant in
           | adolescence, with the importance fading in adulthood. The
           | purpose of the research is to understand the role of the
           | organ in later age.
        
       | FollowingTheDao wrote:
       | Ascorbic Acid, crucial to protecting the thymus:
       | 
       | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25608928/
        
       | DantesKite wrote:
       | There's an amino acid chain synthesized from the thymus of a cow
       | that helped double my lymphocytes (they were low for months).
       | Called Thymic Protein-A. Readily accessible. One of the few
       | things that made a change. Nothing else really helped me out.
       | 
       | What I find interesting how the thymus becomes essentially a blog
       | of fat as we get older and partially explains why infections tend
       | to hit us harder as we age.
        
         | cma wrote:
         | I can't remember what it was but there was a talk about some
         | kind of tradeoff with thymus function and age that was supposed
         | to explain its atrophy, something like pneumonia death vs auto
         | immune or cancer or something?
        
       | zingababba wrote:
       | I haven't dug deep into it but the TRIIM trial
       | (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6826138/) seemed to
       | show promising results with a combination of rHGH, metformin, and
       | DHEA on thymus regrowth.
        
       | xeromal wrote:
       | I've always felt us removing things like tonsils and appendix
       | without a high barrier was always premature. I remember kids
       | wanting to have their tonsils removed to eat ice cream for a few
       | weeks. lol.
       | 
       | Even if we have legacy parts in out body, I'm fine just letting
       | it fester in my body as long as it's not trying to kill me.
       | 
       | Feels very similar to thinking farming just needs 3 nutrients.
       | Turns out better farming requires a lot more.
       | 
       | I am just a plain old bozo though so I could be talking out me
       | ass
        
         | maximilianburke wrote:
         | I think we're getting better about non-surgical interventions
         | when it's not necessary. Appendicitis can, and is, treated with
         | antibiotics, but the timing has to be spot on otherwise it
         | needs to come out. I had to have mine removed because by the
         | time I was seen in the hospital it had already burst. I think
         | the only time that people pre-emptively remove appendixes is
         | when you can't risk the chance of a burst; like if you're the
         | over-winter physician at Amunden Scott South Pole station
        
           | bluepod4 wrote:
           | > Appendicitis can, and is, treated with antibiotics
           | 
           | Yeah, kids don't get tonsils removed anymore either. Just
           | antibiotics.
        
             | ReallyAnonymous wrote:
             | surgeon here: antibiotic treatment works great as long as
             | there's no peritonitis and/or no appendicolith seen on CT.
             | However, statistics show that 30% of successfully treated
             | patients go on to get appendicitis again within 1 year.
             | 
             | Anyway, I offer my patients a choice. Most choose surgery.
             | Those conscientious enough without insurance usually choose
             | nonoperative management because it's much cheaper.
        
               | nicup12345689 wrote:
               | The 30% is because people do not change their diet so
               | they'll once again be susceptible.
        
               | robbiep wrote:
               | No it's not, you've got no idea what you're talking
               | about. There isn't an 'appendicitis' diet
        
         | readthenotes1 wrote:
         | Chesterton's Fence
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | I had my tonsils out for what at the time we thought was
         | legitimate reasons, but well after they started phasing out the
         | practice.
         | 
         | I recall when I woke up my throat didn't hurt (possibly due to
         | painkillers), and when they brought ice cream and popsicles to
         | sooth my pain I felt like a fraud. But the experience up to
         | that point was traumatic to put it lightly, so you're damned
         | right I was going to get all of the treats I could wrangle.
        
         | hsur8192 wrote:
         | It appears that Chesterton's Fence applies to bio-science as
         | well!
        
           | xeromal wrote:
           | Very applicable to programming too. I'm pretty conservative
           | as a programmer and I've had coworkers want to completely
           | change a segment but you never know why some weird
           | programming was done. There be dragons sometimes.
        
             | jaggederest wrote:
             | As a software engineer who has sometimes specifically
             | specialized in handling dragons, I always try to leave
             | (sometimes voluminous) comments about why a thing was
             | handled that way when it's not obvious to a surface
             | reading.
             | 
             | Good practice in general but particularly so when you find
             | a heisenbug that must be exterminated.
        
         | tgv wrote:
         | The ice cream was to ease the pain. The cold calms the exposed
         | nerves.
        
           | xeromal wrote:
           | Makes sense. I was very jealous of my friends at the time but
           | I never took mine out.
           | 
           | I just get mad tonsil stones now. lol
        
             | sam36 wrote:
             | My grandmother had hers taken out in the 1940's. Now she
             | has a small pocket/hole that food gets stuck in which can
             | cause her to gag and/or sometimes throw up.
        
               | xeromal wrote:
               | I have those even with tonsils. The gunk produced by it
               | can STINK
        
           | orev wrote:
           | They did not express any indication that they didn't
           | understand why ice cream is often recommended, so you don't
           | need to be explaining it. The point of the comment is that
           | kids don't understand what's going on, only hear about the
           | ice cream thing, and then want the same procedure just so
           | they can eat ice cream for a week.
        
             | [deleted]
        
             | randomdata wrote:
             | Except they demonstrated interest in the response. Further,
             | they are not the only person who reads the comments. Others
             | may be interested to know the relationship between ice
             | cream and tonsils.
        
           | tjohns wrote:
           | The ice cream was a lie.
           | 
           | After I had my tonsils removed, even the thought of solid
           | food was out of the question. It was just too painful.
           | 
           | You can have as much ice cream as you want. What they don't
           | tell you is you won't want any. :P
        
           | adolph wrote:
           | Wouldn't the exposed nerves make the pain of "brain freeze"
           | more likely?
           | 
           | Anyway, the relationship of tonsils and ice cream was
           | established by Richard Scarry in "What do people do all day?"
           | [0]
           | 
           | 0. https://books.google.com/books?id=tuqKDQAAQBAJ&pg=PA45
        
           | ipython wrote:
           | I encourage you to read the book "Madeline" for more
           | information on this phenomenon.
        
             | SamBam wrote:
             | All the little girls cried "Boohoo, we want to have our
             | appendix out, too!"
        
           | darkclouds wrote:
           | I thought tryptophan used to be added to icecream in the 70's
           | and 80's until the tryptophan scare that caused Eosinophilia-
           | myalgia.
           | 
           | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eosinophilia%E2%80%93myalgia_s.
           | ..
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | mjfl wrote:
       | You mean the place where your T cells mature and develop immune
       | responses? Duh.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-10 23:00 UTC)