[HN Gopher] Theory of interstellar trade (1978) [pdf]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Theory of interstellar trade (1978) [pdf]
        
       Author : mooreds
       Score  : 107 points
       Date   : 2023-08-16 16:45 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.princeton.edu)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.princeton.edu)
        
       | pavel_lishin wrote:
       | Charles Stross has written at least two full-length novels that
       | are, at their core, about interstellar economics:
       | 
       | - Neptune's Brood
       | (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neptune%27s_Brood)
       | 
       | - Singularity Sky (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Singularity_Sky)
        
         | neaden wrote:
         | And note that Krugman and Stross are friends, or at least
         | friendly with eachother. Stross has referenced this paper and
         | Krugman has talked positivly about both those novels and the
         | Merchant Princes, which is about a group of people who can
         | travel between parallel worlds and make money doing so. They
         | have also appeared on panels together at conventions.
        
         | zabzonk wrote:
         | also the weirdo cordwainer smith novel "the planet buyer" with
         | its concepts of how near money is to earth.
         | 
         | https://gutenberg.ca/ebooks/smithcordwainer-boywhoboughtolde...
        
       | ur-whale wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
         | twiddling wrote:
         | All part of the great conspiracy of course...
        
       | pjdesno wrote:
       | To understand the bogus funding acknowledgement, it helps to
       | remember that this was written during the era of Proxmire's
       | Golden Fleece awards, which picked random government-funded
       | academic researchers and held them up for public ridicule based
       | on highly slanted and selective descriptions of their research.
        
         | throw0101b wrote:
         | * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Fleece_Award
        
           | dmbche wrote:
           | "National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) funded project by
           | psychologist Harris Rubin for $121,000, on developing "some
           | objective evidence concerning marijuana's effect on sexual
           | arousal by exposing groups of male pot-smokers to
           | pornographic films and measuring their responses by means of
           | sensors attached to their penises".[26][27]"
           | 
           | One of the prize winners
        
             | Forge36 wrote:
             | "Only Difference Between Screwing Around and Science Is
             | Writing It down" - Myth Busters
             | 
             | Edit: I originally misquoted. A quick search corrected what
             | I'd misremembered.
        
             | nemo8551 wrote:
             | That's tremendous, can you imagine the initial
             | conversations?
        
               | olddustytrail wrote:
               | I suspect the initial conversation was along the lines
               | of, "holy shit Harris are you fucking with me? You can
               | get money for this?! Dude!"
        
               | coldacid wrote:
               | I'd be even more interested in how the initial
               | conversations about the alcoholic sunfish were like.
        
       | wannabebarista wrote:
       | I wrote about this article a few years ago [0]. It's a fun read,
       | but I'm still not entirely convinced by its critique. Here was my
       | conclusion at the time: At its worst, this article is the amusing
       | grumblings of a disgruntled researcher; at its best, it's an
       | interesting take on methodology.
       | 
       | This was one of my favorite papers I've found through Fermat's
       | Library [1].
       | 
       | [0] https://bcmullins.github.io/top-articles-2020/#the-theory-
       | of...
       | 
       | [1] https://fermatslibrary.com/journal_club
        
       | fsckboy wrote:
       | I admit I didn't RTFA but please, _Hypothesis_ of interstellar
       | trade.
        
         | bluGill wrote:
         | No, this is an actual theory. That interstellar trade between
         | humans isn't likely ever (even at the speed of light it takes
         | too long), that doesn't mean we can't make theories about how
         | it would work. This is based off of basic economics theory.
        
           | fsckboy wrote:
           | till it's tested, it's a hypothesis. Hypotheses are not
           | random ideas, they need to incorporate all the theoretical
           | knowledge you have so they are not disproven a priori. Then
           | your hypothesis is "according to theory" and incorporating
           | the previously unexplained data, but it will not be a theory
           | till the predictions it makes are tested.
        
         | gnulinux wrote:
         | > I admit I didn't RTFA but please, Hypothesis of interstellar
         | trade.
         | 
         | This is a very interesting comment because it tries to nitpick
         | the difference between "hypothesis" and "theory" without either
         | understanding the difference, or checking which one applies to
         | OP. A theory is a logical framework with initial assumptions
         | (axioms) and rules of inference. If one creates a model for
         | interstellar trade and discusses its assumptions/implications
         | it is then a theory. I don't know what "hypothesis of
         | interstellar trade" would even mean. This would be like seeing
         | "Group Theory" and saying it should be "Group Hypothesis"... It
         | doesn't seem clear to me what you're implying the article may
         | even be about.
         | 
         | I _know_ that many people will consider this comment snarky,
         | but I truly think one of the issues in human communication is
         | attempting nitpick something without comprehensively
         | understanding it. Human communication is flexible, nebulous and
         | ambiguous. Nitpicking communication willy-nilly does more harm
         | than good, imho.
        
           | fsckboy wrote:
           | a theory explains all the data you have gathered, including
           | tests that the theory predicted. When you collect data that
           | the theory fails to explain, you look for a hypothesis that
           | makes some predictions that you could test. If the new data
           | you collect is according to your hypothesis, then your
           | hypothesis is on the way to being part of the theory.
           | 
           | stop calling an earnest effort to choose the right word
           | "nitpicking".
           | 
           | If our theories of matter, energy, space-time and relativity
           | rule out the hypothesis for interstellar trade, that is not a
           | theory of interstellar trade.
           | 
           | methinks you are guilty of the problem I was pointing out?
        
       | creer wrote:
       | Charles Stross, Neptune's Brood, 2013 gives us an exhuberant and
       | ambitious tour of interstellar finance and fraud when the speed
       | of light is still the limit for data transmission and
       | interstellar ships are massive commercial endeavors on a massive
       | time scale involving a massive amount of debt.It's part 3 of
       | Saturn's Children series but I don't remember it being necessary
       | to have read the first two.
        
         | brazzy wrote:
         | What's part two then? Bit Rot is just a short story.
        
           | creer wrote:
           | That is the one I noted as part 2. Yes a short story - now
           | found online.
           | 
           | Saturn's Children, 2008; Bit Rot, 2010; Neptune's Brood, 2013
           | 
           | http://www.antipope.org/charlie/blog-static/2013/06/short-
           | st...
        
       | OhMeadhbh wrote:
       | Ha! Lol. I almost got kicked out of business school when I
       | referenced this paper.
        
       | hn8305823 wrote:
       | This is without a doubt the most sensible thing I have ever read
       | from Krugman.
        
       | _Algernon_ wrote:
       | "A solution if derived from economic theory, and two useless but
       | true theorems are proved."
       | 
       | What more can you want from a paper?
        
         | mcguire wrote:
         | "Among the authors that have not pointed this out are Ohlin and
         | Samuelson."
         | 
         | This is a thing of beauty.
         | 
         | "In fact, I will assume that investors, human or otherwise, are
         | able to make perfect forecasts of prices over indefinite
         | periods."
         | 
         | I'm crying here.
         | 
         | Figure II is indeed puzzling.
        
         | netsharc wrote:
         | "It should be noted that, while the subject of this paper is
         | silly, the analysis actually does make sense. This paper, then,
         | is a serious analysis of a ridiculous subject, which is of
         | course the opposite of what is usual in economics."
        
           | bloopernova wrote:
           | That's great, it sounds almost like a Pratchett Discworld
           | footnote.
        
       | aperrien wrote:
       | Is there a similar economics paper on interplanetary trade? The
       | abstract seems to mention one.
        
       | FrustratedMonky wrote:
       | >"A solution is derived from economic theory, and two useless but
       | true theorems are proved".
       | 
       | Nice.
       | 
       | Any idea if this has been used in a video game? maybe like Eve?
        
       | PeterCorless wrote:
       | There was a better take on interstellar trade in the Traveller
       | boxed set. And it relied on FTL travel to make any sense.
        
         | whartung wrote:
         | Well in the context of the paper, the fact that the
         | interstellar drive in Traveller manages to avoid the
         | relativistic affects of lightspeed travel makes things much
         | easier.
        
       | ChrisArchitect wrote:
       | some discussion from 3 years ago:
       | 
       | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25592285
        
         | dang wrote:
         | Thanks! Macroexpanded:
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade (Paper) [pdf]_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29834636 - Jan 2022 (1
         | comment)
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade (1978)_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25592285 - Dec 2020 (103
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25548440 - Dec 2020 (2
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18216631 - Oct 2018 (1
         | comment)
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17534950 - July 2018 (180
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade (1978)_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13064504 - Nov 2016 (47
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade (1978) [pdf]_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8937197 - Jan 2015 (57
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _Krugman's Theory of Interstellar Trade_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6632381 - Oct 2013 (82
         | comments)
         | 
         |  _The Theory of Interstellar Trade, Paul Krugman (1978)_ -
         | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=818706 - Sept 2009 (6
         | comments)
        
       | shekispeaks wrote:
       | OMG somebody just listened to the OddLots podcast. We are all
       | sheeple.
        
       | savrajsingh wrote:
       | this is the kind of thing that, I wish chatgpt could ocr, read
       | and summarize
        
       | kitanata wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | mooreds wrote:
       | I heard about this from this Odd Lots podcast:
       | https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-08-11/paul-krug...
        
         | throw0101b wrote:
         | Audio:
         | 
         | * https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/paul-krugman-on-
         | ufos-a...
         | 
         | * https://omny.fm/shows/odd-lots/paul-krugman-on-ufos-ai-
         | and-r...
         | 
         | * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZFzKswRLBQ
         | 
         | The paper comes up in the first ten minutes.
        
         | cwebberops wrote:
         | I was commenting in the Discord that this is where this had to
         | have come from.
        
         | shekispeaks wrote:
         | We are all sheeple.
        
         | wills_forward wrote:
         | Great podcast
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-16 23:00 UTC)