[HN Gopher] Ask vs. Guess Culture
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Ask vs. Guess Culture
        
       Author : kiyanwang
       Score  : 527 points
       Date   : 2023-08-18 15:06 UTC (7 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (jeanhsu.substack.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (jeanhsu.substack.com)
        
       | boobalyboo wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | tcgv wrote:
       | I mainly "Ask" for people in my inner circle, and "Guess" for
       | everybody else
        
       | rossdavidh wrote:
       | Great article. One point I would like to add, is that "guess"
       | culture works great when there is already a lot of shared
       | cultural background, but "ask" culture works better when people
       | are coming from very different backgrounds (and thus won't know
       | enough about what the other person wants or needs, to guess very
       | accurately). Sure, it's good to find out more about where other
       | people are coming from, but this takes time, and in the meantime
       | stuff has to get done. I'm guessing this is why most workplaces
       | are "ask" culture.
       | 
       | Also, most families have enough common background to make "guess"
       | culture work, so a lot of adolescents and young adults are more
       | accustomed to "guess" culture, but once they move out into the
       | world to deal more with people that have very different
       | backgrounds, they will need to become more comfortable with "ask"
       | culture.
        
       | tetha wrote:
       | Hm, interesting. I guess me with northern german heritage am very
       | much more of an Ask-Person.
       | 
       | But this is missing an important part of the ask-aspects: You can
       | put needs and issues onto peoples radar.
       | 
       | Like, someone recently just asked me if I have a kiln to sell. I
       | very much don't have a kiln I don't need to sell and I had a good
       | laugh about the request. But interestingly, someone else I know
       | apparently knows how to setup kilns and he'd help if there was a
       | kiln to sell and he's now talking to the other dude about kilns.
       | 
       | This is very much how things work in rural nothern germany or
       | northern germany overall. You just ask around if you need
       | something, people learn what you need, and suddenly someone is
       | like "Yo, this friend of a brother of the owner of a goat my
       | sister owns has this thing and you mentioned you could need it
       | three years ago and he wants to get rid of it. Could he come over
       | tomorrow?"
        
       | spookie wrote:
       | Thanks for the post, it has really made me feel better about
       | things in general!
       | 
       | I come from a rural place in Europe, guess culture was the norm.
       | 
       | Now, I'm on a different country altogether, and it has been
       | difficult perceiving the world around me... But this makes sense,
       | it somehow clears my mind.
       | 
       | Really, thanks.
        
       | noahlt wrote:
       | The "Ask vs Guess" name rhetorically frames it in favor of the
       | Askers. Asking sounds reasonable, guessing does not!
       | 
       | But really it's not about "Guessing", it's about understanding.
       | It's about community, and relationship, and trust. What this
       | culture really wants is for you to pay attention and understand
       | the people around you, rather than treating everything as a
       | transaction.
        
         | moffkalast wrote:
         | I'm not sure if I see it that way, both extremes equally lead
         | to dysfunctional interactions.
         | 
         | You shouldn't feel bad for asking for help when you need it and
         | other people haven't noticed it, and it's good to be mindful of
         | those around you and what they need. A balance of both should
         | be healthy.
        
         | sfg wrote:
         | I've never heard of asking vs guessing culture before and don't
         | know much about them, but, based on the article, I'd say
         | guessing looks more transactional. It uses a shared history and
         | remembers past favours ("I gave him soup, so I can seek to get
         | his van", as the example in the article had it), which is
         | really an implicit transaction without guarantee the other side
         | will meet their end.
         | 
         | I am not even sure transactions are possible in asking culture,
         | as it looks stateless. Askers just broadcast needs without
         | reference to any past event, such as a favour.
         | 
         | This might be an equivocation, but, funnily enough, you said
         | guessing is about understanding and for people to have an
         | understanding is a way of saying they have a transaction (often
         | implicit). For instance, "I gave him a pass on that, so now we
         | have an understanding that I can do this".
        
           | samus wrote:
           | People in "ask" culture can provide context to their request,
           | in effect making it transactional again. That works best if
           | parties are not in a close relationship with each other, else
           | the communication is already more contextual and "guess"-like
           | than with loose acquaintances.
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | The author mentions a couple times coming from a "guess"
         | culture and adjusting to an "ask" one, so I think they are in
         | some sense in favor of "ask," at least in the workplace. I mean
         | they are clearly trying to adopt some of the habits.
         | 
         | It is interesting--I think thoughtful people like the author
         | tend to see the limitations of the habits they've grown up
         | with, and the advantages of the ones they are trying to adopt.
         | But of course both tendencies have advantages and
         | disadvantages.
        
         | superfrank wrote:
         | I've never heard these terms before, but I've known about this
         | concept for a while and I've always used "implicit" and
         | "explicit" as my descriptors for the two different approaches,
         | which I feel have less negative connotations.
        
         | opportune wrote:
         | Asking isn't necessarily transactional.
         | 
         | If I go to your house and ask for a glass of water, it's
         | because I'm thirsty and I know it's NBD for you to get a glass
         | and put water in it. I'm not expecting to give or get anything
         | else in return, nor am I trying to be rude by insinuating you
         | should have given me a glass of water. The thought process
         | goes:
         | 
         | 1. I am thirsty.
         | 
         | 2. I don't think it's rude to ask for water since it's
         | effectively free and only requires you to have a clean glass to
         | serve it in.
         | 
         | 3. I ask for water.
         | 
         | Community and trust is all well and good, but most of my social
         | circle are transplants from all over the country/world which
         | all have different social mores. There is no common or
         | universal social dance about how to behave when you want
         | something from someone else or how you should be polite when
         | you go hang out with someone in this kind of setting. And if
         | someone does try to fit their specific background culture into
         | such a setting in a way that makes it so they're offended when
         | I ask for water or a favor, it's on them.
         | 
         | That's not say I think Asking is "superior" but just that it's
         | not transactional so much as it is pragmatic (but potentially
         | impolite) especially in certain situations, like socialization
         | within a highly diverse-background group.
        
         | wwweston wrote:
         | "Explicit vs Implicit" is more accurate and value neutral, and
         | doesn't require anyone to load down the explicit side of the
         | equation with generalized aspersions like "treating everything
         | as a transaction."
         | 
         | There are advantages to explicit and implicit negotiation.
         | There are situations in which either might be more graceful or
         | necessary.
         | 
         | Most situations are probably best navigated with some degree of
         | implicit negotiation first, paired with a layer of explicit
         | interaction as a check.
         | 
         | > it's not about "Guessing", it's about understanding.
         | 
         |  _Asking_ is often a good way to make sure you actually
         | understand.
         | 
         | "Guessing" may be an acceptable substitute to the extent your
         | intuition doesn't have an error term.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | solarmist wrote:
         | "Thing is, Guess behaviors only work among a subset of other
         | Guess people - ones who share a fairly specific set of
         | expectations and signalling techniques. The farther you get
         | from your own family and friends and subculture, the more
         | you'll have to embrace Ask behavior. Otherwise you'll spend
         | your life in a cloud of mild outrage at (pace Moomin fans) the
         | Cluelessness of Everyone."
         | 
         | The more diverse the people a guesser interacts with the more
         | dysfunctional, as in not working how they intend, guess
         | behavior becomes. If you need to interact with people who have
         | even somewhat different values guess culture becomes
         | unworkable.
        
         | johnnyjeans wrote:
         | Maybe "Inquire vs Infer" is better?
        
         | amerkhalid wrote:
         | I am from guess culture, it is almost impossible for me to
         | decipher needs of everyone and communicate my needs without
         | asking. Unless those needs are very standard traditional needs
         | like offering water to a guest, giving up seat for an elder
         | etc. And it is not just me it seems everyone seems to
         | misunderstand and everyone complains about others who didn't
         | guess their needs correctly.
         | 
         | Using the example from article, the mover would be complaining
         | about everyone who didn't guess that they needed help with
         | moving and how they had given soup to all those people.
         | 
         | I really appreciate ask culture and find it much easier to
         | navigate. It is so much easier to hangout with friends who can
         | just ask for what they want or just say no. I have learned to
         | ask but still find it stressful to say no.
         | 
         | Speaking of no, in my culture, apparently, no means, "ask me
         | again I am just being polite, I will say yes after your ask me
         | 3rd time."
        
         | smeej wrote:
         | Hmm. I think I've primarily experienced the really dark side of
         | guess culture, so I appreciate your framing of it as a desire
         | for understanding when it's in a healthy context.
         | 
         | I've experienced it in the contexts of narcissism and
         | borderline personality, where the underlying thought is, "I am
         | so obviously the center of the world that anyone with half a
         | brain who's paying a whit of attention should to intuit my
         | needs without my having to speak a word. If I have to speak,
         | you have already failed." And anyone who failed was punished,
         | sometimes intensely.
         | 
         | Ask culture, for me in that context, became about being able to
         | exist as a separate person and express a boundary. I'd much
         | rather put the cards on the table, find out we want completely
         | different, even opposed things, and work from there, than deal
         | with the power imbalance of one person's assumption that anyone
         | who isn't reading their mind is an idiot.
         | 
         | It seems the virtue, as most of the time, is in the mean.
        
           | mannykannot wrote:
           | In this case, the unreasonable person does not understand the
           | culture he is embedded in, and would not understand an 'ask'
           | culture either, where refusal to accede to his wants is
           | regarded as reasonable.
           | 
           | The difference between normal and pathological behavior in
           | either culture lies in whether people treat others in the
           | same way they would like to be treated themselves.
        
           | platz wrote:
           | I expect you incorporate aspects of "guess" culture without
           | even realizing it.
           | 
           | For example, Is it okay if I bang your wife/gf?
           | 
           | If you think that's a rude question, why? All I'v done is
           | Ask.
        
             | smeej wrote:
             | I don't think I understand your example, but that may come
             | from having had more than my share of polyamorous friends.
             | 
             | By default, I would take your request at face value and
             | have no trouble saying, "No, we're monogamous, but I can't
             | very well blame you for wanting to!"
        
               | platz wrote:
               | very well, but what percentage of the population do you
               | think would consider that rude.
               | 
               | Of course, the nut of the question is whether its ever
               | possible to be rude with a question. If it's possible to
               | be rude with a statement, I don't really see the
               | difference between questions and statements, at the
               | higest level, though
        
           | Aerbil313 wrote:
           | > "I am so obviously the center of the world that ... If I
           | have to speak, you have already failed."
           | 
           | IME this person is always a women dominating her family. Idk
           | why.
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | What you're describing is abusive behavior, which is
           | something I would hesitate very strongly to characterize as
           | part of any cultural norm.
        
             | DirkH wrote:
             | I guarantee you that abusive cultural norms exist and many
             | poor individuals stuck in cultures with abusive norms wish
             | they were living in a different culture.
        
             | galangalalgol wrote:
             | It can be more moderate than that. "what is wrong honey?".
             | "Nothing, I'm fine". Which can either mean, no really I'm
             | fine, or if you don't know, you obviously don't care about
             | me, or you know exactly what is wrong and don't pretend
             | otherwise. I've been both parties in that conversation, and
             | over time I have learned that ask culture works better
             | between close friends and family. That doesn't mean I'd
             | consider it abusive though, just a non optimal
             | communication strategy.
        
               | hosh wrote:
               | If there is one thing I learned, it is that when it comes
               | to life partners and family where the stakes are
               | conmingled, for the really important stuff, it is better
               | to be open and direct.
               | 
               | So I think one of the hidden dimensions here are -- are
               | you guessing because you are trying to consider the other
               | person, or are you guessing because there is
               | vulnerability to exposing what you really feel?
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | As a product of Southern American culture, I would note
               | that "guess" culture as described here - specifically,
               | the preference for indirectness and inference - is always
               | something that exists primarily in and near interaction
               | among strangers. It doesn't always disappear entirely in
               | familiar relationships, but does abate significantly in
               | favor of being more direct. (Of course, this in itself
               | increases the chance of cultural mismatches causing
               | conflict, as what's ordinary for someone from an "ask"
               | culture can easily read as an insulting assumption of
               | excess familiarity for someone raised with "guess".)
               | 
               | That said, it is important to keep in mind that what's
               | here under discussion is a broad and fairly imprecise
               | description of how varying acculturation can affect
               | interpersonal relationships mostly among people who don't
               | know one another all that well. In that context it's
               | useful; to try to generalize it to every human
               | interaction is not.
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | This also reminds me of the distinction drawn between
               | "honor" and "dignity" cultures, as eg in [1]; I'd be
               | interested to see how the "ask" vs. "guess" distinction
               | maps, especially as antebellum Southern and prewar
               | Japanese cultures both fall as strongly on the "honor"
               | side as their modern successors fall on the "guess" side.
               | 
               | [1] https://alexandria.ucsb.edu/lib/ark:/48907/f37d2s7h#:
               | ~:text=....
        
             | epylar wrote:
             | I can think of several examples.
             | 
             | Verbal abuse, childhood bullying, body shaming,
             | cyberbullying, workplace harassment are all abusive and
             | normal and accepted in many cultures.
        
             | __MatrixMan__ wrote:
             | Why is that? Don't you think that abuse can become a
             | cultural norm?
             | 
             | I don't think we'd have ever come up with money if abuse
             | weren't a common cultural norm. It's pretty much a proxy
             | for "or I'll have my thugs hurt you".
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | Better put, I'd say that I would hesitate to characterize
               | a cultural preference for either directness or
               | indirectness as akin to the kind of abuse a narcissist
               | deals out to everyone around them.
               | 
               | The argument is easy to construct in either direction,
               | but in no case adds anything of value to the
               | conversation.
               | 
               | Too, claiming that abuse is "just a cultural thing"
               | offers both abusers a convenient excuse for their
               | actions, and everyone who isn't abusive but does share
               | traits of whichever culture an undue indictment.
        
           | flatline wrote:
           | I have lived this too.
           | 
           | Likewise ask culture can only be healthy if there is not a
           | power imbalance: is the asked party really free to say no?
           | 
           | The title is catchy but I'm not sure how useful this
           | dichotomy really is.
        
             | reddit_clone wrote:
             | It is also true that for some (many?) people it is very
             | hard to say 'No'. I don't know any psychological/technical
             | name for this but it is simply true and it is in their
             | nature.
             | 
             | When asked directly, they will give in even if they don't
             | like doing what is being asked.
             | 
             | 'Asking' in these cases is actually exploitation (if done
             | with prior knowledge).
        
               | TylerE wrote:
               | People Pleaser
        
             | ativzzz wrote:
             | You can also be more empathetic with ask culture and soften
             | or make the request more obvious to say no to.
             | 
             | Instead of saying "can you do x" you can say "i know you're
             | busy so no pressure whatsoever but if you're available can
             | you do me out with x? feel free to say no my feelings won't
             | be hurt"
             | 
             | Yea it's a lot more words but the general gist is you ask
             | with an additional explicit "out" for the other person so
             | they can say no using your pre-provided excuse instead of
             | them having to come up with one. I've found this over
             | communication can be useful for bridging the gap sometimes
        
               | reddit_clone wrote:
               | As a (suffering) guesser myself, when I have to ask
               | something I always phrase it like 'would you be
               | interested in doing this?' so that they can say 'no'
               | without stress.
               | 
               | Instead of asking 'Would you do this for me? etc.' which
               | I know would cause a mild-natured guesser stress.
        
           | Tijdreiziger wrote:
           | > [...] one person's assumption that anyone who isn't reading
           | their mind is an idiot.
           | 
           | Ah, I see you've met my dad.
        
           | MyneOutside wrote:
           | This and when that person is a manager, yikes
        
         | kolanos wrote:
         | I actually think there's an inversion of ask/guess spectrum and
         | it is the offer/guess spectrum.
         | 
         | To add on to a GP's example of the northern U.S. being
         | predominantly an ask culture and the southern U.S. being a
         | guess culture, I think the inverse is true for offering things
         | as opposed to asking for them.
         | 
         | Southern hospitality is very much an offer culture. Whether you
         | need or want something, it will be offered. The guess culture
         | aspect of asking flips when it comes to offering. In the south
         | it is widely considered rude to not impulsively offer even when
         | you know you're likely going to get a "no".
         | 
         | However, in the north the reverse is true. Usually you will
         | only be offered something when it is apparent that thing is
         | wanted or needed. It is actually considered something of an
         | imposition to be offered something you don't want or need.
         | 
         | In other words, I don't think you can just cast these cultures
         | as high context and low context, it is more a case of where the
         | culture places contextual importance.
        
         | davideg wrote:
         | I appreciate you calling this out! In my community we started
         | talking about it as "Ask" vs "Attune" culture. On the one hand
         | do you assume everyone will be explicit with their wants,
         | needs, and boundaries? On the other, do you pay attention to
         | who you're engaging with, their general disposition, their
         | communication style preferences, etc?
         | 
         | I personally like to keep a balance between the two extremes
         | and try to adapt my behavior to who I'm engaging with (you can
         | tell I'm comfortable in an "Attune" culture environment, but I
         | appreciate when people are up front and communicative about
         | their needs, wants, and boundaries). Considering the power
         | differentials at play and the ability for someone to enforce
         | their true boundaries is really important to me, and also
         | having meta conversations to encourage folks to speak up about
         | their needs and boundaries.
         | 
         | In a work context, I will have a meta conversation with someone
         | about their preferred communication style, how they want to
         | receive feedback, how they want to be checked in with, etc. to
         | avoid mismatched communication expectations.
        
         | ubermonkey wrote:
         | That framing is at least as bad as the framing you project on
         | the Ask/Guess split.
         | 
         | Clearer communication is always better.
        
         | blargey wrote:
         | > What this culture really wants is for you to pay attention
         | and understand the people around you
         | 
         | This sort of framing highlights the worst case scenario of
         | "guess" culture imo. Where members assume that outsiders to the
         | "guess" culture only need to "pay attention" to pick up on all
         | the right norms and assimilate into the community that they
         | spent decades growing up in (and that everyone ought to, in the
         | first place, because the "guess" culture considers itself the
         | necessary consequence of virtues like trust and caring). Which
         | leads to great offense being taken when people don't adhere.
        
           | xeromal wrote:
           | I think that guess culture has attuned me to knowing when I
           | need to include a quiet person into a conversation or to
           | check in on my neighbor when I notice they seem down. Reading
           | people is an undervalued skill that was honed in my guess
           | culture upbringing.
        
         | sircastor wrote:
         | What term would you use to describe it? Respectfully, I think
         | you're projecting an opinion onto it. There's no inherent value
         | in the word "Guess". A "guess" culture isn't without
         | transactional interactions, it's just shifted the transaction
         | to implicit expectations instead of explicit.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | sh1mmer wrote:
         | I feel like "Ask" vs "Sense" would be a better term.
         | 
         | I've found this a lot in relationships where partners where a
         | high bar is expected for how well I can to intuit their current
         | state. "If I have to say it, it's not romantic", etc.
         | 
         | I think I tend to fall somewhere in the middle between the two
         | extremes. Being able to ask is feels good, giving and getting
         | feedback feels good, but having someone not care about being
         | aware of where I am at (or factoring that in) doesn't feel
         | good.
        
       | tracerbulletx wrote:
       | People actually DO feel annoyed when people ask them for
       | unreasonable things. So it's not unreasonable at all to take that
       | into consideration and predict if a question will put them out.
       | People are tuned to favor one strategy over another, but there is
       | a real social cost to asking, and a real cost to not asking.
       | There is no one right strategy, just another optimization problem
       | that our brains have solved with emotional weights. Also the
       | people who ask for things get offended all the time when people
       | say no, so that's a problem too.
        
       | swayvil wrote:
       | Asking as submissive act. Thus avoided.
       | 
       | I've seen that in internet conversations. Where a simple question
       | would do, a prolonged process of guessing, assuming and even
       | accusing is embarked upon. Because none of the participants wants
       | to submit, to lose.
       | 
       | It's a dom/sub culture thing. USA culture is such a culture. Look
       | at popular fiction. It's invariably concerning the dominance of
       | rightness over wrongness.
       | 
       | So reality itself stands upon the form of the dom/sub
       | relationship in a way.
       | 
       | It's pretty deep.
        
       | solarmist wrote:
       | The most important thing I got from this was from the original
       | Ask post forever ago.
       | 
       | "Thing is, Guess behaviors only work among a subset of other
       | Guess people - ones who share a fairly specific set of
       | expectations and signalling techniques. The farther you get from
       | your own family and friends and subculture, the more you'll have
       | to embrace Ask behavior. Otherwise you'll spend your life in a
       | cloud of mild outrage at (pace Moomin fans) the Cluelessness of
       | Everyone."
       | 
       | The more diverse the people a guesser interacts with the more
       | dysfunctional, as in not working how they intend, guess behavior
       | becomes. If you need to interact with people who have even
       | somewhat different values guess culture becomes unworkable.
        
         | RangerScience wrote:
         | Seconding this. Anecdotally, the more multicultural a space is,
         | the more it trends towards "ask".
        
           | solarmist wrote:
           | Through necessity.
        
       | quacked wrote:
       | I am from the northern US (Protestant Scandinavian/German) and my
       | wife is from the southern US (Protestant English/German) [1]. In
       | the first several years of our relationship, we had several big
       | disputes about how to treat each other, and how to treat guests.
       | After a while we realized that she had been brought up to feel
       | extreme insecurity over responding to the needs of guests, and I
       | had been brought up to be blithely ignorant to the needs of
       | guests.
       | 
       | Over the years I definitely insulted several southern guests by
       | mostly ignoring them, and she definitely projected insult onto
       | several northern guests by assuming that they were secretly
       | judging us for not being better hosts. We've since realized that
       | southerners tend to prefer "guess" culture and northerners tend
       | to prefer "ask" culture, to use the terminology from the article.
       | There are certainly many exceptions, but this generalization has
       | taught her to chill out a little over hosting duties, and taught
       | me to pick up some slack when taking care of guests.
       | 
       | We still both greatly prefer our native cultures. I don't like
       | being fawned over or offered things I don't want, and she is
       | extremely recalcitrant when it comes to asking for anything.
       | 
       | [1] I mention the distant ancestral backgrounds because it's
       | amusing to me how well I get along with northern Europeans who
       | are plainly spoken and "rude" by US standards, and how a lot of
       | proper hosting culture from the UK reminds me of how her family
       | operates. She finds Scandinavians and Dutch incredibly rude,
       | whereas I find the English hilariously polite, even to their own
       | detriment.
        
         | burlesona wrote:
         | This is fascinating to me, because I'm from the southern US and
         | strongly align to "ask culture" and my wife is from the
         | northwest and strongly aligns to "guess" culture.
         | 
         | I wonder how much it's about individual family background and
         | not strongly regional?
        
           | ketzo wrote:
           | When you say that your experience in the south is more Ask --
           | who is usually doing the asking, host or guest?
           | 
           | I said this down the thread but my experience (grew up in the
           | south) has always been that Southerners are very up-front
           | about trying to meet your needs before you can even ask for
           | them. That was always how I was taught to host, anyway.
           | 
           | And I think that weirdly, that's more aligned with Guess
           | culture: the person who _needs_ something should never have
           | to _ask_ for it.
        
             | burlesona wrote:
             | No, for my family growing up, nobody was going to try and
             | read your mind, if you want something say something. For
             | her family, they are always trying to anticipate needs. For
             | her, if I'm not anticipating needs and taking care of them
             | -- ie, if she has to ask -- then I'm being rude.
        
             | nmstoker wrote:
             | Yes, I'm with you on considering this to be a guess culture
             | thing (since you have to be sensitive to what they might
             | need, likely want)
        
           | echelon wrote:
           | > This is fascinating to me, because I'm from the southern US
           | and strongly align to "ask culture"
           | 
           | As a southerner, I don't agree. It's split by the
           | directionality of the request. And I think that's what makes
           | southern culture distinct.
           | 
           | We'd never "ask" when we're the guest, only when we're the
           | host. "Ask"-y guests are considered rude. "Guess"-y hosts are
           | considered unwelcoming and inhospitable.
           | 
           | You can "ask" a stranger how they're doing or if they need
           | anything, but you don't impose upon them. It's often common
           | to strike up conversations this way.
           | 
           | It's a directionality. "Ask" when you're the giver, "guess"
           | when you're the receiver.
           | 
           | You always hold the door. You don't ask for someone to do it
           | for you, but you probably feel miffed if they don't, because
           | it's expected that everyone extends each other courtesy.
           | 
           | "Southern hospitality".
        
           | red-iron-pine wrote:
           | yeah im from the south and there is definitely a level of up-
           | front-ness that i'm not sure the parent comment is talking
           | about. like a level of exuberance and get-it-out-ness that
           | often borders on belligerence
           | 
           | "yall doin okay?"
        
             | gottorf wrote:
             | > "yall doin okay?"
             | 
             | Speaking as a Southerner, this sentence is so on point.
        
             | Cthulhu_ wrote:
             | Questions like that really... confuse me, because is it
             | just a generic 'hello' or a serious question?
             | 
             | In my own experience, I once had an obnoxious colleague who
             | asked "How was your weekend?". I didn't like the question
             | because one, I don't like to talk about what I do / did in
             | my spare time, and two, it was leading because the guy was
             | really really eager to talk about HIS weekend, but... I
             | didn't care, or else I would've asked.
        
               | ketzo wrote:
               | If it's coming from someone who could even _remotely_ be
               | considered a  "host" to you, it's definitely a serious
               | question, and they actively want to fulfill any needs you
               | might have. Southern hospitality is a super real thing,
               | it's pretty awesome.
               | 
               | If it's said as a greeting, "how y'all doing?" usually
               | means "how are your family?," which also tends to be
               | meant very genuinely.
               | 
               | Even outside of a host-guest dynamic, I do think
               | Southerners tend to care more about pleasantries; when
               | they ask about your weekend, they're a little more likely
               | to really want to know.
               | 
               | Of course, this is all very broad strokes based on
               | anecdotal experience. Plenty of cold/self-aggrandizing
               | jerks in the South, too!
        
             | dkga wrote:
             | Couldn't help but listen it in Ted Lasso's voice. Thanks
             | for that beautiful moment.
        
             | ubermonkey wrote:
             | Yeah, I'm a lifelong southerner (18 years in MS, 6 in AL,
             | now 29 in Houston). We're pretty up front about what's
             | going on across the board. If you come to a southerner's
             | house, there's usually already hospitality happening -- but
             | if you want something, ask! Just realize we'll say "no" if
             | it's not something we're going to do.
             | 
             | This is jarring to people who cannot receive a no, or who
             | cannot articulate one.
        
             | ketzo wrote:
             | This is counterintuitive, but in the framing of the
             | article, I think that "y'all doin okay?" would actually be
             | part of Guess culture, not Ask culture. It's just a very
             | up-front manifestation of dealing with Guess culture, I
             | think..? It's not Ask culture because _the person who needs
             | something_ is not doing the asking.
             | 
             | This is abstract, but stay with me here
             | 
             | I'm also Southern, and I think that the inclination towards
             | that kind of belligerent helpfulness comes from trying to
             | figure out what your guests want, and making sure they _don
             | 't_ have to ask you for anything.
             | 
             | in my experience the response is "we're all good out here,
             | but thank you!" -- which is classic Guess culture
        
               | quacked wrote:
               | I'm the original commenter, and I agree with you. The
               | person you're responding to is accurate about that
               | "friendly belligerence", but whenever I go down there _I_
               | get all the  "y'all doin' all right?" questions by hosts
               | who are trying to see if I need anything.
        
           | BestGuess wrote:
           | I reckon it has got to do with bein rural and poor, or maybe
           | different kinds of european family cultures preserving
           | different attitudes? Where I'm from in the south you didn't
           | ask at all if you knew what was good for you all about keepin
           | up appearances and you had to be all sly about helping people
           | out. More poor somebody is more sly you got to be. Bein in a
           | city nobody gives a darn but way back when that darn was
           | given pretty darn hard.
           | 
           | Just a guess but could be that attitude has lots more to do
           | with how many are poor or not and how many generations
           | they've been poor, or lived in cities, like a lag time sorta
           | thing. Nothing I really know about just sharing because it
           | might be interesting even if wrong
        
         | detourdog wrote:
         | Baltic state heritage and you sound like my kind of guest/host.
         | 
         | To quote Jerad/Donald at Silicon Valley:
         | 
         | "I like when people yell at me, at least I know where I stand".
        
           | Cthulhu_ wrote:
           | To misquote quote a meme, I like dominant women not because I
           | want to be humiliated, but because they say what they want.
        
             | detourdog wrote:
             | I told her she had control problems... she said we can talk
             | about it in 2 weeks.
        
           | lostlogin wrote:
           | This is a lot like the fantastic line by Scaramucci: 'Where I
           | grew up, we're front stabbers'
           | 
           | https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-40748918
        
             | brandnewlow wrote:
             | A true friend stabs you in the chest. - Oscar Wilde
        
         | mgaunard wrote:
         | The American south always were the sophisticated ones, with
         | proper etiquette.
        
         | rgoulter wrote:
         | "Disputes arising from different communication attitudes in
         | relationships" reminds me of Deborah Tannen's "You Just Don't
         | Understand", which was recommended to me.
         | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Just_Don%27t_Understand
         | 
         | Tannen's main suggestion is at least if you're aware that
         | someone communicates differently than you do, you might either
         | make accommodation, or better understand things that might
         | frustrate you.
        
         | tiffanyh wrote:
         | "Guests, like fish, begin to smell after 3-days"
         | 
         | - Ben Franklin
        
         | hinkley wrote:
         | This reminds me of John Mulaney's bit about Jewish versus
         | Catholic culture. He loved that he didn't have to guess what
         | his girlfriend was thinking, she would just tell him. No
         | filter.
         | 
         | For some people that can be rude or shocking. For others the
         | opposite can be exhausting. The middle ground of mind games is
         | the fucking worst. "Go do that thing I don't like. It's fine."
         | "Why did he go? He knew I was upset!" He answered your passive
         | aggressive bullshit with his own passive aggressive bullshit.
         | That's why. Good luck in couples therapy.
        
           | sss111 wrote:
           | do you have a link or timestamp for this?
        
             | crooked-v wrote:
             | Probably this segment.
             | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogHxa4aPXN8
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | thefourthchime wrote:
           | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogHxa4aPXN8
        
         | carabiner wrote:
         | That sounds more like urban vs rural. The southerners I've
         | known (Alabama) are pretty blunt about asking for what they
         | want. Going further with stereotypes, some people say west
         | coast is guess, east is ask.
        
           | samus wrote:
           | Indeed rural vs. urban is another divide across which such
           | differences are observed. People from big metro areas are
           | usually more blunt than in the surroundings. Probably because
           | people there usually come from diverse backgrounds, but
           | "guess" culture requires the opposite to work.
        
             | hosh wrote:
             | It may have more to do with deeper, more static personal
             | relationships within a community in rural settings. In
             | urban settings, folks generally don't know their neighbors,
             | can hide in numbers, have to be more assertive with
             | strangers and acquaintances, and can get away to a fresh
             | start if they wreck their reputation.
             | 
             | I think ask vs guess is a good start, but looking at my
             | experience and looking at what people are talking about
             | here, there is at least one more dimension at play here.
        
             | xeromal wrote:
             | As someone who's lived in both environments, I think most
             | urban people develop a shell from the constant interaction
             | that's required in a city. People selling wares,
             | hobos/homeless, and a stronger need to protect oneself. You
             | have to be blunt or you'll never get anywhere. lol.
        
               | sethhochberg wrote:
               | This is advice preached to people visiting NYC all the
               | time.
               | 
               | The person on the corner asking "excuse me sir may I
               | please ask you a question" almost certainly has ulterior
               | motives. Locals in a busy neighborhood ignore a guy like
               | that a few times a day.
               | 
               | But the person on the corner who says "hey which way is
               | the 7 train?" with no preamble is gonna get good answers,
               | despite being less traditionally polite.
               | 
               | Where there is constant stimulation, the cultural norms
               | get a lot more direct
        
               | Aerbil313 wrote:
               | That's a very good analysis, so much it seems obvious in
               | retrospect. But I think it misses one other factor: I've
               | witnessed the most rural people to adopt ask-culture when
               | they were guess people before. My gut says this has
               | something to do with social media/smartphones but idk.
        
               | xeromal wrote:
               | Yeah, on the other hand, I recently was looking for an
               | old land cruiser and got in touch with a local guy on
               | facebook. Knew I wanted it and sent him 1k to hold the
               | car for me for a few days until I could rent a trailer.
               | He did so and I picked up the suv without a hitch.
               | 
               | I'd never do this in Los Angeles where I live part time.
               | 
               | I context switch based on which home I'm at, North
               | Georgia or Los Angeles.
        
           | nostrademons wrote:
           | "Going further with stereotypes, some people say west coast
           | is guess, east is ask."
           | 
           | My experience is the opposite. I grew up in New England, and
           | it seemed like there were a large number of unspoken norms
           | (in both business and personal culture) that were really hard
           | to grok. Moving out to the Bay Area, people are refreshingly
           | direct. "Want to come work for equity on my crypto startup?"
           | "No, you're crazy." "Okay goodbye!"
           | 
           | I think that where hypocrisy and indirection are ingrained in
           | Silicon Valley, it's because of diverging incentives and a
           | lust for power. In other words, people won't unconsciously
           | hurt your feelings because they assume you would've
           | consciously spoken up; they will _consciously_ screw you over
           | because they want that billion dollar deal. It feels very
           | much like an ask culture, though, regardless of how crazy the
           | asks are.
        
             | BoxFour wrote:
             | Well, I'd suggest that:
             | 
             | 1) A substantial number of individuals in the bay aren't
             | originally from there.
             | 
             | 2) Assuming the role of a startup founder inherently
             | demands a familiarity with ask culture.
             | 
             | One of the initial steps frequently involves requesting
             | significant amounts of money from individuals, with minimal
             | consequence to the borrower if it doesn't materialize to
             | anything!
        
               | nostrademons wrote:
               | That's precisely what makes Western (and particularly
               | American) culture an "ask" one, though. Ask cultures
               | arise when you have a great diversity of individuals and
               | can't make assumptions on their backgrounds, desires, or
               | how they would interpret an interaction. Guess cultures
               | arise when you have a long period of stability, and
               | communities that form and persist over generations. When
               | this happens, you can start to make consistent norms and
               | then pass them down in childhood, so everyone in the
               | community has a good sense of what's expected of them.
               | 
               | Bay Area startup culture is an extreme example of Bay
               | Area culture in general, which is an extreme example of
               | Western U.S. culture, which is an extreme example of
               | American culture, which is an extreme example of general
               | western European culture. But they're all marked by
               | fluid, transient groupings of people that came from all
               | over.
        
               | BoxFour wrote:
               | I see what you're getting at. My intention was to
               | highlight that I don't believe Silicon Valley culture is
               | synonymous with Bay Area culture. In my interactions with
               | individuals who were _raised_ in Northern California or
               | even the Bay Area, I've seen a lot of "guess" culture
               | fairly similar to the PNW.
               | 
               | To phrase it differently, a significant number of the
               | people you're thinking of probably wont establish lasting
               | roots in the Bay and thus wouldn't be passing down that
               | culture to the subsequent generation of Bay Area
               | youngsters.
               | 
               | It's a thought-provoking query indeed though, pondering
               | what characterizes the "prototypical San Franciscan" and
               | how that might evolve over time!
        
             | dheera wrote:
             | > Moving out to the Bay Area, people are refreshingly
             | direct
             | 
             | Weird, I moved from Boston to the Bay Area and I have the
             | opposite experience.
             | 
             | In Boston if someone asked me to have dinner with them it
             | was always just dinner. If they had other intentions they
             | would state them up front.
             | 
             | In the Bay Area a good fraction of the time the other
             | person has an unstated intention (hiring, dating, asking
             | for intros to dates, asking for intros to investors, asking
             | for other help ...) that I usually need to dig up before I
             | say yes or no. The thing is, sometimes it is a yes, I just
             | wish people would be more upfront that there is an agenda
             | around this "dinner".
        
             | camel_gopher wrote:
             | Have you heard of the California no?
             | 
             | "Gee, that startup sounds cool. Let me get back to you."
        
         | carlhjerpe wrote:
         | > I am from the northern US (Protestant Scandinavian/German)
         | and my wife is from the southern US (Protestant English/German)
         | 
         | You're American, your wife is American.
        
           | margalabargala wrote:
           | This applies to other countries too.
           | 
           | One person from London, the other from Belfast? Both British.
           | 
           | One from Barcelona, the other from Madrid? Both Spanish.
           | 
           | One from Prague, the other from Bratislava? Both
           | Czechoslovakian, until a couple decades ago.
        
           | quacked wrote:
           | Outside America, this is true. Inside America, if you are
           | unaware of pronounced regional cultural differences arising
           | from the settler groups that form your ancestry and local
           | culture, you're either ignorant, or not American.
        
             | ttepasse wrote:
             | But you're already using perfectly good American regional
             | identifiers for those regional differences in your original
             | post.
             | 
             | Pet peeve from a European: the American habit of using
             | their distant ancestor's European ethnicity as a shorthand
             | for stereotypical personality and culture today a)
             | undervalues the massive political and cultural changes in
             | Europe since their ancestor's emigration und b) undervalues
             | the regional differences inside their ancestor's origin
             | country. Being german I find both Ask and Guess culture
             | here, just 50 km apart. And often in the same place,
             | differing by class or the rural/urban divide. Describing
             | ,,German" as just Ask culture is rather wrong from my
             | perspective. I know the outside and Hollywood stereotypes
             | differ.
             | 
             | (And c), I think, distant ancestors ethnic stereotypes
             | undervalues the melting pot/salad bowl effect over
             | generations of the US itself.)
        
               | anthk wrote:
               | Ditto with Spaniards. Most of the "Hispanic coulture with
               | flamenco, sun and beaches" won't apply to a whole 80% of
               | the country. The North has beaches, but the Sun it's an
               | English tabloid. The middle Spain has Sun, but water is
               | something you see in rivers in reservoirs. Also, cold as
               | hell winters.
               | 
               | Now try to figure that across the pond with zillions of
               | native cultures merged with an ( _older than North
               | America itself_ ) Southern Hispanic culture from Mexico
               | to the Patagonia close to the South Pole.
        
           | [deleted]
        
           | crazygringo wrote:
           | I'm genuinely curious, what is the point you're trying to
           | make?
           | 
           | Do you think American doesn't have cultural differences
           | within? Or that those cultures don't correlate at all with
           | geography? Or with ancestry?
        
           | NavinF wrote:
           | You're not wrong, but there are some pretty big differences
           | between south, east, and west. In a lot of ways US states are
           | like independent countries that share a military
        
             | carlhjerpe wrote:
             | Absolutely, I just disagree with trying to identify as
             | being from somewhere else when you're born and raised in
             | the US
        
           | Cthulhu_ wrote:
           | You underestimate how vastly cultures can differ based on
           | location or background. Also keep in mind the US is young and
           | most of its inhabitants have a migrant background / family
           | history.
           | 
           | The US is the opposite of a monolithic culture.
        
             | anthk wrote:
             | Even been into Spain? Half of the Andalusian culture around
             | flamenco it's alien to the rest of the country. Basque and
             | the Nort-Western cultures related to the Celtic lore it's
             | similarly alien to the Castilles, Andalusia, Catalonia and
             | Valencia.
             | 
             | And even in _regions_ themselves you can find alien customs
             | to each other. For instance, in the Basque Country from
             | valley to valley. Or in Andalusia with huge differences
             | between East and West. Yes, like a Mandelbrot fractal.
             | Spain it 's like that.
             | 
             | You can find here any climate. Desserts? Glaciars? Tundra
             | like climates? Cold winters down to -30C on high peaks? Dry
             | heat? Windy heat? Dry cold? Windy cold? Rainy weather, like
             | London if not more? All of them across the country. Now,
             | from these megadiverse climate diffs you can guess you will
             | find zillions of cultures and subcultures because, you
             | know, traditions and architecture change a lot if you live
             | between ponds in Cantabria with more mist than in a Stephen
             | King novel compared to a dry dessert in Almeria were
             | "Spagetthi Westerns" were filmed here and white homes with
             | Arabic architecture reflecting the Sun was a must in order
             | to just survive the Summer.
        
         | Delk wrote:
         | I feel somewhat conflicted about this. I'm from Finland, and
         | while we aren't technically Scandinavian and might be something
         | of an outlier among Northern Europeans in general, the
         | stereotype is that we're not fond of small talk and prefer to
         | be to the point and perhaps even blunt. But in terms of asking
         | for things, I don't feel like I identify with the culture of
         | directly asking. Feeling out or giving hints that I might
         | appreciate some help without making outright requests seems a
         | lot less intrusive and graceful to me. And while personality is
         | probably also a factor, I don't think it's just me.
         | 
         | I think we're generally a high-context culture, and the
         | "guessing" culture as postulated in the post immediately
         | reminds me of that. I don't know if other Northern European
         | cultures are less high-context but it makes me wonder if high
         | vs. low context (possibly similar to guessing vs. asking) is
         | not quite the same axis as bluntness.
        
         | AndrewKemendo wrote:
         | If I've learned anything in my 20 year mental health journey,
         | it's that until you've addressed your childhood trauma, nothing
         | you do will be a lasting fix for any interpersonal issues you
         | may have.
        
           | solarmist wrote:
           | I learned this this year. I'm in my 40s.
        
             | AndrewKemendo wrote:
             | Yeah I'm 39 and just learned it last year.
        
               | carabiner wrote:
               | That's because we all read Body Keeps the Score at the
               | same time.
        
               | AndrewKemendo wrote:
               | Close...Atlas of the Heart
               | 
               | Along with a bunch of other more medical reading
        
               | solarmist wrote:
               | +1 for Atlas of the Heart, but that was more useful after
               | I handled my childhood trauma.
        
               | solarmist wrote:
               | Haven't read it yet. I guess I should.
        
               | [deleted]
        
             | Cthulhu_ wrote:
             | I think a lot of people would benefit from getting some
             | counceling in their earlier adult years, although on the
             | other hand they may not be ready yet / not see any issues
             | yet.
             | 
             | I'm late 30's and same btw.
        
           | throwanem wrote:
           | If you've learned anything in your 20-year mental health
           | journey, I hope it would be that not everyone is exactly like
           | you, nor needs the same things you need. It's remarkably
           | self-centered to assume the prescription that's suited you is
           | exactly right for everyone else, don't you think?
        
             | linster wrote:
             | Wow that's a pile-on.
             | 
             | "What works for you only works for you, so you might not
             | have discovered that it works for anything else, but only
             | if you were _really_ paying attention."
        
             | AndrewKemendo wrote:
             | That's also definitely true!
             | 
             | Some people are lucky to not have significant childhood
             | trauma which means it was never needing to be resolved
        
               | throwanem wrote:
               | And some people are aware that "all interpersonal
               | conflict derives ultimately from unresolved childhood
               | trauma" is one school of thought among many, and no more
               | guaranteed to offer anything generally dispositive than
               | any other.
               | 
               | If it worked for you, that's great! No joke, that's
               | fantastic. But not for nothing, too, is there the old
               | joke about the guy who just started a 12-step program and
               | now no sooner sees someone take a drink in a bar but
               | assumes they're an alcoholic.
        
           | boppo1 wrote:
           | >addressed your childhood trauma
           | 
           | This is pretty frustrating as 90s-kid who had a Good
           | Childhood(tm) and struggles with interpersonal issues. I have
           | a close friend from childhood who also had quite a Good
           | Childhood(tm) and he can't shut up about "trauma" and it
           | seems like every two years he has this big epiphany about how
           | he addressed some "trauma" he was previously repressing and
           | how now that he's done so he's All Better Now(tm). His
           | behavior and overall life outcomes do not have any
           | correlation with these epiphanies. Both of our lives
           | absolutely pale in comparison to the lives of average
           | children in previous generations in terms of 'trauma'.
           | Minimal bullying, no fights, always plenty of toys and food,
           | loving parents, etc.
           | 
           | I know some people with real, legitimate trauma (verbal and
           | physical abuse) and they said that visiting a therapist
           | really helped them to feel a lot better. In such cases of
           | legitimate trauma, I agree that one should do something about
           | it if it's making you feel bad. However, many of those people
           | were already. interpersonally excellent before and after
           | 'addressing' their trauma.
           | 
           | I have had people (including the friend from the first
           | paragraph) suggest I need to "work on my childhood trauma"
           | but really and honestly I can't think of a single thing that
           | was legitimately traumatic. I could take my worst
           | experiences, which I have moved on from and don't feel any
           | need[0] to think about, and inflate them, but I'm pretty sure
           | that would be creating a new psychological problem.
           | 
           | [0]I don't feel any hesitance to thinking about them either.
           | I can sit and ponder them for a whole afternoon if I like,
           | without emotional fluctuation. They're just memories.
        
             | hinkley wrote:
             | In college we hit that age where classmates started losing
             | grandparents. I was one of the oldest grandchildren so I
             | had a few years yet.
             | 
             | Some of these people absolutely fell apart. It was the
             | first time they'd ever lost anyone and they couldn't
             | process it. When gently pressed, we would find out they had
             | no pets growing up. They had not lost so much as a
             | goldfish.
             | 
             | A painless life can set you up for failure when real
             | adversity comes. You lack the resilience, and in some cases
             | the empathy, to navigate these situations. That's not
             | trauma, but it is loss.
             | 
             | Those experiences gave me a whole new perspective on peers
             | whose parents got them goldfish or hamsters at a young age.
             | Some of these parents were setting up object lessons.
             | Basically the chicken pox party of loss.
             | 
             | At that point I had lost a dog, and as a sensitive kid it
             | wrecked me. And the worst part of it was every time I
             | caught my breath some new asshole would offer his
             | condolences. Thanks, I wasn't thinking about my dog for ten
             | minutes and now I'm thinking about her again. Can we just
             | stop talking about it please?
             | 
             | I learned to offer sympathy without an agenda. Engaging
             | them is trying to make them process on your timeline. It's
             | thoughtless, even a little cruel. Definitely selfish. A
             | good friend will step in and push if weeks later you have
             | not mourned. But the next day? Give them space, Jesus.
             | 
             | I really appreciated, in that moment, the northern
             | midwestern trope of bringing the bereaved food and just
             | sitting with them. Let them talk, or not. I almost pulled a
             | muscle watching Lars and the Real Girl. The little old
             | ladies sitting in his living room, knitting, surrounded by
             | casseroles and hot dishes. Just talking to each other and
             | watching him out of the corner of their eyes. Talking about
             | anything else. Yep that's about it. Here if you need us,
             | not holding our breath for you to say so.
        
               | lostlogin wrote:
               | I went to a Waldorf school and now my daughter does. At
               | around age 10-11 children learn about death and practices
               | around it (Norse, Egyptian, local practices) and what it
               | means. The Waldorf philosophy holds that children start
               | to understand that death is a permanent loss at about
               | that age, and aims to teach them about it.
               | 
               | Having a kid lose a pet at that age is a major thing for
               | them to process.
               | 
               | I love the school, but the disorganised over-parenting
               | libertarian hippies can be overbearing at times.
               | 
               | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waldorf_education
        
               | TuringTest wrote:
               | Is it true what they say that Waldorf is based in
               | irrational teachings about the supernatural, and let's
               | children go several courses without learning basic
               | rational stuff like reading well and doing math?
               | 
               | I'm all for growing children with creative teaching and
               | avoiding rote memorization, but I'd be horrified if that
               | was at the cost of missing the best years for setting the
               | pillars of rational thought.
        
             | travisjungroth wrote:
             | One way to view it is dealing with childhood trauma is
             | necessary but not sufficient to fixing interpersonal
             | issues. The problem is there are at least three
             | opportunities for common errors of reasoning.
             | 
             |  _if_ you have unresolved childhood trauma (people forget
             | this is conditional) then resolving it is _one of_ (not
             | all) the requirements for fixing chronic interpersonal
             | issues you _may_ have (not everyone does).
             | 
             | If someones make all those mistakes at once, you get they
             | tell you to heal your childhood trauma to fix your
             | relationship disasters and it's like "My childhood was
             | fine. And I had one argument with one person. I'm just
             | gonna go talk to him about it..."
        
             | cfiggers wrote:
             | People overuse and overgeneralize the term "trauma" for
             | sure. But it might be helpful to see real actual trauma as
             | only one item in the larger set of "stuff from your past
             | that impacts/has influence on you today, that you mostly
             | aren't aware of, but that if you were aware/more aware of
             | you'd be able to handle better."
             | 
             | The way our primary caregivers relate and respond to us
             | when we're a) in our most rapid periods of development and
             | b) completely dependent on them for everything _absolutely_
             | has an influence on the way we turn out. How could it not?
             | 
             | So there's no such thing as Neutral/No Influence, there is
             | only identifying what effects there are and learning how to
             | lean either into or out of those influences on a
             | situational basis. All of this definitely applies to
             | childhood trauma, but it doesn't HAVE to be trauma for that
             | logic to apply. Figuring that stuff out is a helpful part
             | of maturing, and it doesn't have to be a critical or
             | negative thing.
             | 
             | In many ways I've come to appreciate and love my parents
             | even more as I've worked through the ways they raised me
             | the best they could, given the resources they had, but in
             | ways that I can now see preferable alternatives to.
             | 
             | I think it's the biggest "I Love You" in the world to self-
             | consciously seek to grow beyond the limitations that were
             | passed on to me, just like I want my little girl to outgrow
             | the ones I consciously or unconsciously hand down to her.
        
             | ggambetta wrote:
             | I just want to say I appreciate your humorous use of the
             | trademark symbol. I love it, but not everyone does. There's
             | dozens of us! Dozens!
        
             | nicup12345689 wrote:
             | I think the key is to inspect the childhood trauma, however
             | small, BUT don't try and make it your identity. You are
             | just making some things conscious, understanding yourself.
             | The moment it becomes a crutch, it is just an excuse for
             | not taking agency over your own life.
             | 
             | In a way it is the perfect excuse, a childhood determinism
             | of sorts. Blame everything just to avoid ANY change of the
             | self.
        
             | Cthulhu_ wrote:
             | It doesn't have to be a Big Thing though; the problem is
             | that the word "trauma" sounds / feels very serious, but it
             | can be trivial things, or things you shrugged off like
             | "well those things just happen".
             | 
             | Personal example, I had a good (girl) friend when I was
             | like six, I was very lonely / isolated before she came
             | around and we played together and the like. But then her
             | parents moved and I never saw her again.
             | 
             | And for many years, that was it, it happened, couldn't do
             | anything about it, nothing abnormal about it. But then
             | because of Reasons I ended up going to therapy, and that
             | event (plus others) are probably linked to a fear of
             | abandonment / commitment, of a pessimism when it comes to
             | relationships (as in, don't get too close, it'll end and
             | there's nothing you can do about it).
             | 
             | But also there's a factor of "My 'trauma' isn't that bad
             | because others have had it worse". Doesn't mean you aren't
             | valid either.
        
             | munificent wrote:
             | _> I have had people (including the friend from the first
             | paragraph) suggest I need to  "work on my childhood trauma"
             | but really and honestly I can't think of a single thing
             | that was legitimately traumatic._
             | 
             | Let me just copy/paste an older comment of mine:
             | 
             | ---
             | 
             | Imagine you've lived in the same house your entire life.
             | There's a big couch taking up half the living room, but one
             | of the legs is broken. When you were really little, it
             | tipped over when you sat in it, so you just learned to walk
             | around the couch over to the not-very-comfortable armchair
             | and sit there instead.
             | 
             | This was so long ago that you don't even remember learning
             | not to sit in the couch. You don't think about how much
             | room that couch is wasting or how much time you spend
             | walking around the couch to get to the chair. Sometmies you
             | stub your toe on the way around, but everyone trips every
             | now and then. You've been doing this so long that it is
             | completely unconscious. Hell, you can and do navigate the
             | room in the dark.
             | 
             | Friends ask you about your living room furniture and you--
             | completely honestly as far as you know--say it's all fine.
             | You describe your chair in detail. It's not perfect, but
             | it's serviceable. Certainly lots of other people have
             | furniture that's in worse shape. At least you don't have
             | any of _those_ problems.
             | 
             | Then you sit down with a therapist for a few hours and they
             | say, "Hey, what's up with that couch?"
        
               | boppo1 wrote:
               | I understood the concept already, thanks.
               | 
               | But thank you for providing readers an example of the
               | kind of condescension I was describing.
        
             | ilikecakeandpie wrote:
             | > and he can't shut up about "trauma"
             | 
             | The worst thing that's every happened to someone is still
             | the worst thing that's ever happened to them. Though it
             | might not be something like mental/physical abuse, it's
             | still their bottom even if it pales in comparison to
             | someone else's. Also, lots of families have secrets and can
             | portray a healthy image when in reality we generally see
             | people at their "best" in social settings. I think the key
             | here is self-awareness without diminishment, which can be
             | difficult.
             | 
             | Also, at least with my algorithms, there is just so much
             | bombardment from social media about things like trauma,
             | mental illness, and neurodivergence where one can get lost
             | in what they're being presented and be convinced that just
             | because they read the dictionary for fun when they were
             | younger that they're neurodivergent instead of possibly
             | just being a curious child. If one is in a vulnerable state
             | or just worn down from seeing all this, it almost incites a
             | FOMO response of "hey, I was traumatized too!"
             | 
             | I do think that normalizing and acting to remove the stigma
             | from discussing these things is a net positive overall but
             | it can be damaging for sure
        
             | adamweld wrote:
             | FWIW the data agrees with you, for milder cases of anxiety
             | and depression, which often correlate with interpersonal
             | issues, talk therapy (e.g. dissecting childhood trauma) is
             | much less effective than cognitive behavioral therapy
             | (analyzing behavioral and emotional patterns, trying to
             | catch and redirect cycles of thought and action that lead
             | to negative outcomes).
        
               | taurath wrote:
               | CBT is designed around outcomes that can be easily
               | measured. It can also be actually harmful in cases where
               | there's actual trauma or neglect underlying the behavior
               | or thought patterns. It has a tendency to paper over
               | them.
               | 
               | It helps a lot of people, but it't also a trap for those
               | who have more deep things to work through, having spend 6
               | years stalled out in CBT before coming to grips with the
               | deep trauma and neglect, and the dissociation that was so
               | prevalent in my life that CBT therapists never even
               | bothered screening for. Ask anyone with an emotionally
               | neglectful or abusive upbringing what CBT did for them
               | and you'll get quite a few nasty answers.
        
               | kayodelycaon wrote:
               | > It has a tendency to paper over them.
               | 
               | Yeah. That's one of the dangers the book I had talked
               | about. CBT is a tool for rewiring the brain. If you have
               | deep things to work out and don't recognize it, CBT will
               | do exactly what it says on the tin and rewire around
               | things that need to be explored.
               | 
               | That's very not good.
               | 
               | I'm bipolar and use CBT a lot. Identifying if the problem
               | is logic-based is key to its application. Logic cannot
               | override depression or mania, which means CBT doesn't
               | work and alternative strategies are needed. Usually I
               | switch to some variant of DBT techniques. (It's so
               | automatic at this point it's hard to identify all of what
               | I'm doing.)
               | 
               | In my experience, learning when to apply CBT is much
               | harder than learning CBT.
        
             | EGreg wrote:
             | I sometimes like to say the facts out loud and challenge
             | people so here it goes.
             | 
             | We live in the safest, least racist, least sexist, least
             | antisemitic generation in history. At the same time,
             | automation and productivity has reduced demand for human
             | labor, and people increasingly can't afford the rent.
             | Perhaps the answer to many disparities isn't systemic
             | sexism, racism etc. but economic factors. Whatever you are
             | worried about, your grandparents had it much worse.
             | 
             | Also, let's improve our systems to stop polluting the
             | environment and destroying ecosystems for corporate profit
             | at the expense of future generations. That's the major
             | issue of our day, far bigger than climate change.
        
               | robotresearcher wrote:
               | > At the same time, automation and productivity has
               | reduced demand for human labor
               | 
               | We have approximately the lowest unemployment rate in
               | modern history.
        
               | EGreg wrote:
               | That's only a tiny slice of the story.
               | 
               | It doesn't count the people who have opted out of the
               | workforce.
               | 
               | It doesn't count the job insecuroty of the gig economy.
               | Or the people with terrible conditions.
               | 
               | It actually underscores the fact that both sexes flooded
               | the labor pool in the last few decades, automation
               | increased and wages got depressed due to all these
               | factors.
               | 
               | USSR also had near-total employment, for men and women,
               | way earlier than USA did. And ironically, the rent cost a
               | ton less. But people overall couldn't afford that much.
               | 
               | Your grandfather could have supported an entire family on
               | one man's paycheck, and paid for an entire house. Today,
               | millennials onwards can't afford any of that. The
               | generation of adults with the least savings in probably a
               | century.
               | 
               | But, as I said, we still have it amaing. Medical
               | advances, technology like air conditioning, electricity
               | and so on. The Internet spreads so much knowledge around
               | the world. I'm just saying that the remaining problems
               | are often rooted in economic issues, more than a rise in
               | "systemic X ism"
        
               | dustincoates wrote:
               | > It doesn't count the people who have opted out of the
               | workforce.
               | 
               | Not the headline number, but in the US you certainly can
               | find this data if you want it, in the U4, U5, and U6
               | rates:
               | 
               | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U4RATE
               | 
               | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U5RATE
               | 
               | https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U6RATE
               | 
               | It only goes back to 1994, but these measures are
               | currently all at or near the lows over the that period.
        
               | robotresearcher wrote:
               | Agree with all that. I disagree only that demand for
               | labor has decreased, and near-full employment is my
               | evidence for that. Many jobs are shitty, but someone is
               | demanding the labor.
        
               | EGreg wrote:
               | Well, I guess what I am trying to say is that more people
               | are asked to do work, but less work, and paid less for it
               | too, adjusted for inflation.
               | 
               | Gig economy and short stints at jobs are an example of
               | how little employers really value their labor force, as
               | opposed to the "company man" who worked for decades and
               | got a pension.
        
               | travem wrote:
               | > At the same time, automation and productivity has
               | reduced demand for human labor, and people increasingly
               | can't afford the rent
               | 
               | Given the juxtaposition of the claims above, I think it
               | is useful to note that demand for labor is still
               | relatively high (unemployment rate at ~3.5% in the US).
               | The reason for unaffordable rents is driven more by the
               | supply of housing not growing along with demand IMO.
        
               | Cthulhu_ wrote:
               | And demand being artifically inflated by investors
               | (ranging from boomers / gen-X ers who have extra money to
               | Saudi oil barons) who buy up houses with the intent to
               | rent them out or whatever.
        
             | h4l wrote:
             | I think it's relative to our own experiences. If you drive
             | on a perfect road, even a small bump is noticeable. But I
             | don't think that means people's perception of problems is
             | not legitimate. There's always someone worse off,
             | especially if you compare now to historical times.
             | 
             | If there's a sure-fire way to create a mental health
             | problem, it's to tell yourself you don't deserve to have a
             | problem because other people have worse problems.
        
               | brazzledazzle wrote:
               | I think trauma is also a bit relative. If you grew up
               | with bad physical and emotional abuse from one parent the
               | emotional distance and isolation from another might not
               | even be a blip on your radar, at least until you've
               | worked through the other stuff. And on the flip side if
               | you had a great childhood with stable housing, plenty of
               | food/money then hitting rock bottom in adulthood might be
               | pretty traumatic since you never had to develop the
               | mental tools required to handle serious adversity.
               | Obviously some trauma is objectively worse but competing
               | over trauma severity is pointless.
        
               | watwut wrote:
               | The thing is, kids who grew up in those good families are
               | in fact more resilient then abused kids.
               | 
               | Kids with bad childhood will not categorize semi bad
               | childhood as trauma, but have worst interpersonal
               | relationships, worst stress handling, abuse drugs or
               | alcohol more often and display whole range of at risk
               | behaviors
               | 
               | It is simply not true that being poor or abused or
               | neglected makes people resilient.
        
               | brazzledazzle wrote:
               | That's an excellent and fair point. Perhaps "resilience"
               | is the wrong term for abused folks and it could be said
               | as "ability to continue functioning at their usual level
               | of dysfunction". I've seen enough examples of ostensibly
               | well raised (typically younger) adults being hit really
               | hard by adversity that I think there's something to it.
               | Maybe confirmation bias or perhaps those individuals had
               | overprotective parents that shielded them from developing
               | a lot of skills. That sort of dysfunctional parenting can
               | be harder to recognize in adults.
        
               | jimmaswell wrote:
               | I always think of this SMBC strip.
               | 
               | https://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/2011-07-22
        
               | h4l wrote:
               | I love it, thanks!
        
             | pjerem wrote:
             | idk
             | 
             | I also had Good ChildhoodTM by your definition.
             | 
             | Still I'm pretty sure I have been traumatized by the two
             | big moves of my childhood, loosing my childhood friendships
             | twice.
             | 
             | It doesn't look big, I am ok at socializing so I have
             | friends but I know that when shit hits the fan, it happens
             | that I dream of my first childhood friend and I'm pretty
             | convinced that this is why I sometimes feel alone even when
             | I'm well surrounded.
             | 
             | The point wasn't to tell my life but to say that you can't
             | really judge other's "traumas". It's highly personal how
             | you feel about something and when someone doesn't have
             | something you have (in my case childhood friends) it's easy
             | to feel like it's not important (maybe you can't understand
             | because your own childhood friendship eroded normally and
             | you don't feel like it's an issue)
        
         | huijzer wrote:
         | I've gone through a ton of comments below and see a lot of
         | contradicting evidence to your thoughtful suggestion. Also my
         | girlfriend and I are both from north Europe and I notice a
         | similar difference. Maybe the difference is mostly
         | 
         | > she had been brought up to feel extreme insecurity
         | 
         | This reminds me of a quote from Buffett from about 40 years
         | ago. He said something along the lines of "when women are
         | raised, they hear and see a million reasons why they cannot do
         | things whereas men see and hear a million reasons why they can
         | do things". If I would be convinced by the world that I am not
         | good, then sure I would treat guests amazingly well. If I would
         | be convinced by the world I'm amazing, then why bother treating
         | guests well? They can say it if they need anything.
         | 
         | I'm happy to hear counterarguments if you have them
        
           | nonethewiser wrote:
           | The American south has a very distinct attitude towards
           | guests. Very hospitable. That's the difference in his case.
        
       | mabbo wrote:
       | > Deciding what to eat for dinner with guess-culture people isn't
       | as simple as asking people what they want to eat for dinner,
       | because they will not tell you what they actually want to want to
       | eat for dinner.
       | 
       | This was nearly a deal-breaking problem early in my relationship
       | with my wife. I am "ask", she is "guess". We just want to figure
       | out what we're going to order for dinner, why on earth is this
       | turning into a fight?
       | 
       | What we came up with was a simple system.
       | 
       | Person A presents three options, all of which they like. Person B
       | picks from those three options. If they don't like any of the
       | three, swap roles, and person B presents three options. If person
       | A doesn't like any of those three options, give up and just go
       | get dinner separately (this has never actually happened, yet).
       | 
       | Everyone is getting their preference in some way. No one has to
       | guess what the other person wants. Fights are avoided.
        
         | dahfizz wrote:
         | I feel you. Some "guess" people are unable to just state what
         | they want because they think it places a burden on the other
         | person. But keeping your desires hidden creates an even larger
         | burden! Just tell me what you want for dinner!
         | 
         | I play a similar game with my wife. Whenever we have a hard
         | time choosing something, I present 5+ options, and we take
         | turns eliminating one option until only one is left.
        
         | breischl wrote:
         | That solution is a bit like the game theory solution of "I cut,
         | you choose". https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divide_and_choose
        
           | solarmist wrote:
           | Yup. It works well for both types of people as well.
        
       | jacobkg wrote:
       | I remember when I first heard about this concept and found it
       | explained a big difference between my brother and I that I had
       | struggled to articulate (he is an asker and I am a guesser)
        
         | BurningFrog wrote:
         | Interesting, because you were presumably raised in the same
         | culture?
        
           | Nifty3929 wrote:
           | There is another interesting dichotomy between people who
           | phase questions as statements, and those who don't?
        
       | maypop wrote:
       | It's often two staged.
       | 
       | First drop hints in hopes the other party will catch on.
       | 
       | If that fails and you really want or still need it - you ask.
        
       | forinti wrote:
       | > It's rude to put someone in a position where they have to say
       | no to you
       | 
       | This made me think about a small aspect of Brazilian culture. If
       | someone is selling something expensive like a house or a car,
       | they will probably get mad at you for offering to pay a value
       | much lower (or maybe not even that much lower) than what was
       | advertised.
        
       | aden1ne wrote:
       | I think the author is conflating American culture with Western
       | culture at large.
        
       | silentsea90 wrote:
       | I belong to a don't ask or guess culture where i would rather
       | just lift a mountain myself than ask my friends for help just so
       | I don't inconvenience anybody, or be in their debt on a favor.
        
       | globular-toast wrote:
       | Something I noticed with my ex was how we differed in asking for
       | help. I guess I am an asker and she is a guesser.
       | 
       | Me: if I need help I will ask for help. I do NOT want you to
       | offer help unless I ask and I especially do NOT want you to just
       | join in and help if it looks like I'm struggling. I feel entitled
       | to the satisfaction of having done it myself, if I can.
       | 
       | Her: if she needs help she won't ask for it but hopes her
       | frustration is apparent and help will come. Finds it very
       | uncomfortable to watch people struggling and feels compelled to
       | offer help or just join in and help. Feels annoyed if help
       | doesn't come when she needs it.
       | 
       | As you can imagine this caused quite a bit of conflict between
       | us, at least until I understood what was going on.
       | 
       | But I think in every other respect I'm a guesser.
        
       | poopsmithe wrote:
       | I'm having trouble understanding the following sentence.
       | 
       | > People say yes to requests that you truly feel good about, say
       | no to ones they don't
       | 
       | Is this perhaps a typo? I can understand the sentence if I
       | substitute 'you' with 'they'.
        
       | grammers wrote:
       | People really should learn to say what they want - and also say
       | no. Otherwise they'll just end up being unhappy because, whether
       | they like it or not, there will always be people that are
       | ignorant (and most of the times it won't even be on purpose).
        
       | patmcc wrote:
       | This always strikes me as funny, because I think the default
       | interpretation (and the one shared in the article) is that it's
       | largely a Western/Eastern divide - Americans are 'ask' and Asians
       | are 'guess' - but from where I am in Canada I generally see
       | exactly the opposite. I don't know if that's specific to my
       | circles though.
       | 
       | My friends who are immigrants (or children of immigrants) from
       | Hong Kong, Taiwan, India are all 'askers', whereas those of us
       | with families who've been here 2+ generations are 'guessers'.
       | 
       | Is Canada a 'guess' culture more than America?
       | 
       | Another funny thing from the article - "A squeaky wheel gets the
       | grease" - I've always understood that to be true, but _shameful_.
       | Like yes, you can put up a fuss and often get what you want, but
       | only by being  "squeaky" - annoying, brash, offputting.
        
       | tonystubblebine wrote:
       | Jean! Cross post this please!
        
       | keiferski wrote:
       | I feel like this should be directly correlated with how much
       | "tradition" plays a role in local culture. The more tradition,
       | the more you're expected to "just get it" and guess the other
       | person's thoughts via cultural context. The less tradition, the
       | less rules there are to follow, and therefore the less connection
       | you have to the other person.
       | 
       | An extreme example being: the interactions between two foreign
       | cultures are (or at least ought to be) almost entirely ask-based,
       | as they have no prior understanding of how the reciprocal
       | cultures work.
        
       | rdtsc wrote:
       | > This all seemed ridiculous to us, so instead we drove the two
       | hours, keeping our plan secret until we pulled up into our
       | grandma's driveway, so that no one could resist and thwart our
       | plan. We had a lovely visit, and my mom later thanked us for
       | making the drive. [...] This is guess culture -- and it's a lot
       | of saying not really what you actually want, and it's a lot of
       | reading between the lines to try to figure out what people want.
       | 
       | Guess culture here also functions as a test of love or loyalty.
       | They are nice, so they'll say "nah, you don't have to see
       | grandma, it's a long drive..." but in their heart they hope you
       | will make the effort because you love your grandma. If they tell
       | you to see your grandma, your visit in their view (and your
       | perception too) won't have quite the same meaning. There is
       | suspicion you saw her because you were told, not because you
       | really wanted to.
        
       | RangerScience wrote:
       | A friend of mine (we're all pretty solidly "Ask", but ofc there's
       | a mix) pointed out that a really important _unspoken_ part of an
       | "Ask" culture is _what you are allowed to ask about_ - thankfully
       | (and anecdotally) you can generally just straight-up ask  "what
       | can I ask for?".
       | 
       | Still. Important realization, and definitely something I've
       | failed at before.
        
       | SirMaster wrote:
       | I'm firmly in the ask culture I guess.
       | 
       | Life's too short to guess. I'd rather everyone be direct, say
       | what they want.
       | 
       | If it offends someone, well, sorry but too bad I guess.
        
       | friend_and_foe wrote:
       | I think this is a bunch of over complication to explain away
       | spinelessness when faced with the prospect of telling someone
       | "no." Say no to people, it's empowering!
       | 
       | There are cultural norms in places about courtesy, hospitality,
       | when it's appropriate to ask for certain favors, but that's not
       | what the article is about. It's about telling people no vs making
       | excuses. It's about being afraid to say what's on your mind.
       | There's no culture associated with that, only confidence,
       | competence and bring the arbiter of your own life.
       | 
       | It's pretty simple: don't hit people up for money unless your
       | absolutely have no choice, be good to guests you've invited into
       | your home, and say no to things you don't want to do without
       | making up excuses.
        
       | stefanpie wrote:
       | Interestingly, I went into this article thinking that "guess
       | culture" would mean something along the lines of guessing what
       | others want or what the right thing to do is, executing it, and
       | revising after the fact based on feedback. Essentially, "It's
       | easier to ask forgiveness than it is to get permission." I guess
       | you can call this "do" culture. However, the article talks about
       | guess culture as something else.
       | 
       | One of the most valuable skills I've learned in grad school is
       | how to get good at using all three: guess, ask, and "do" culture.
       | You really need all three in an environment like that to navigate
       | complex admin tasks, raise money, pursue ideas, and be a normal,
       | friendly, empathetic person to work and collaborate with.
        
         | msla wrote:
         | > Interestingly, I went into this article thinking that "guess
         | culture" would mean something along the lines of guessing what
         | others want or what the right thing to do is, executing it, and
         | revising after the fact based on feedback. Essentially, "It's
         | easier to ask forgiveness than it is to get permission." I
         | guess you can call this "do" culture. However, the article
         | talks about guess culture as something else.
         | 
         | Yeah, a more intuitive name would be "Just Ask" vs "Guess If
         | You Can Ask" which emphasizes the difference: Someone from a
         | Just Ask culture wouldn't understand having to guess if you can
         | ask someone something.
        
       | drc500free wrote:
       | I always enjoy the discussion around this concept.
       | 
       | I do agree that the Guess label is a little off. That's a bit
       | like saying a quarterback is only "guessing" that their receiver
       | will break off their option route where they are expecting. It's
       | really only Guess culture to an outsider who doesn't know the
       | expectations (as you see when a new WR keeps getting the read
       | wrong, leading to turnovers).
       | 
       | And as others have said, everything is on a continuum. There are
       | very few "ask" cultures where you can just ask someone if you can
       | sleep with their wife and expect no negative repercussions at
       | all. And I doubt that you can get a "no" from someone 25 requests
       | in a row and have neither party question the relationship a
       | little bit.
       | 
       | And there's some unspoken aspects to every request; if you ask
       | someone if you can grab some food from the fridge and they say
       | yes, even in an ask culture they probably have some assumption of
       | how much food you are reasonably going to take. If they come back
       | to an empty fridge, you won't assuage their anger by saying "well
       | I asked and you said yes."
       | 
       | In a new situation, I try to interpret requests like an Asker and
       | make requests like a Guesser (without being offended if I get a
       | no), until there's some shared understanding. That's taken a lot
       | of work, since I'm naturally a Guesser through-and-through.
        
       | tempestn wrote:
       | These concepts don't generally apply universally to all things.
       | There are things that are perfectly reasonable to ask for
       | directly. "Could I have a glass of water?" "Could I use your
       | bathroom?" There are other things that create an uncomfortable
       | obligation. "Could I borrow $5000?" "Could you pick me up from
       | the airport at 4am?" There's no point in beating around the bush
       | about the first set, but it is polite in most cultures I'm
       | familiar with to give a person an "out" of the second.
       | 
       | So instead of directly asking in those cases, you could instead
       | mention your need, without directly asking. "The vet bill's going
       | to be $5k and I have no idea where we're going to come up with
       | it." "Ugh, the flight gets in in the middle of the night; going
       | to have to see if I can get a cab or something at 4am." You give
       | them a chance to _offer_ help, but don't create an expectation.
        
       | DoreenMichele wrote:
       | The formal terms for this difference are high context culture and
       | low context culture.
       | 
       | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-context_and_low-context_c...
       | 
       | "Guess" culture would correspond to high context culture. You
       | need to have a lot of shared context -- or be able to read a lot
       | of clues to the context -- to infer what was really meant as a
       | means to be adequately polite.
       | 
       | "Ask" culture would correspond to low context culture. It is
       | often characterized as "rude" by outsiders but is also pro-
       | diversity, such as New York City and American military culture.
       | 
       | Some people can navigate either type of culture, assuming they
       | know what type of culture they are dealing with. Others assume
       | the world works one way or the other and default to whichever one
       | they grew up with, most likely.
        
       | outsidetheparty wrote:
       | The original MetaFilter comment lays the idea out in a much more
       | balanced way than this article does, imo. The discussion of the
       | idea here looks to be well on its way to mirroring that on
       | MetaFilter (Ask vs Guess became a major part of that site's
       | culture, it came up in quite a few threads over time.)
       | 
       | https://ask.metafilter.com/55153/Whats-the-middle-ground-bet...
       | 
       | (To me the most interesting thing about the concept is that you
       | can immediately tell from people's reaction to it which category
       | they personally fall into.)
        
         | JadeNB wrote:
         | > (To me the most interesting thing about the concept is that
         | you can immediately tell from people's reaction to it which
         | category they personally fall into.)
         | 
         | It reveals things about other people, but also about oneself.
         | For example, I always assumed that people were just _afraid_ to
         | ask and answer questions honestly; until I read that post, I
         | was not aware that there was any cultural choice being made.
         | And so I learned that, partly through upbringing and partly
         | through choice, I was an Asker; but that people who were
         | Guessers were operating on an equally sound footing to mine,
         | just from very different assumptions.
        
           | outsidetheparty wrote:
           | Definitely!
           | 
           | The original post and discussion was an eye-opener for me;
           | before that I never understood why some people would say
           | "yes" to a request but then act put upon anyway, or would act
           | vaguely like they wanted something but never actually come
           | out and say so. I just thought they expected everyone to be a
           | mind-reader.
           | 
           | Once I understood they were basing things on the premise that
           | putting someone in a position of having to say "no" was rude,
           | it all made a lot more sense, and I was able to adjust my own
           | behavior and expectations to better fit theirs.
        
       | jancsika wrote:
       | One distinction: "guess culture" isn't easy to discern from low-
       | self-esteem culture. But "ask culture" isn't easy to discern from
       | narcissist culture.
       | 
       | Service people have to cater to the lowest common denominator.
       | Serving low-self-esteem culture just means doing the same kind of
       | customer service one would do anyway: be clear, assure and
       | reassure, be positive, listen closely, be understanding,
       | consistent, etc.
       | 
       | Serving a narcissist is a completely different category: predict
       | bad faith misinterpretations of your positive statements and
       | sensible responses to them, low-key reject 2nd and 3rd attempts
       | at bad faith misinterpretations, ignore ad hominem attacks,
       | intuit whether their friends acknowledge the narcissism, know
       | when to (quickly) turn them over to a manager, etc.
       | 
       | Consequently, some members of the "ask" group preface everything
       | they ask with politeness or some other obvious tell to
       | distinguish themselves. But the rest are jerks, IMO. They want to
       | pretend that randomly requesting a free desert at an Applebee's
       | is just a case of, "If you don't ask you won't know." But at the
       | _moment_ of asking, the server has to assume they are a
       | narcissist and up their stress level accordingly. At least in
       | America, there 's no way you can be adult age without having
       | witnessed narcissists making rando requests so that they can take
       | out their stress/anger on service people. Given that knowledge,
       | it's not a matter of culture-- it's just plain stubbornness and
       | selfishness.
        
       | Tronno wrote:
       | I disagree with the way these behaviors are portrayed as a
       | cultural dichotomy. To me, the author's examples all fall under
       | ineffective communication.
       | 
       | Their example of "ask culture" involves stoking resentment by
       | making unreasonable requests. This can be avoided by practicing a
       | little empathy. Ask questions, provide some basic context, and
       | offer an escape hatch: "What are you busy with? I need X because
       | Y. It's fine if you can't, I can also get it from Z".
       | 
       | Their example of "guess culture" sounds like mind-reading and
       | ambiguous non-verbal signaling, maybe even to the point of being
       | passive aggressive. Again, use empathy. Volunteer information
       | that others might want to know. Be genuinely curious, ask
       | questions. _Communicate_.
       | 
       | Make sure both parties know enough to make informed decisions.
        
         | caminante wrote:
         | As posted above, the dichotomy is "popsci" fiction with little
         | substantiation.[0]
         | 
         | Yet, I think it's useful for awareness.
         | 
         | [0] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-context_and_low-
         | context...
        
         | silisili wrote:
         | I tend to agree. I'm very much in the 'guess' camp by
         | description, personally. I would never ask for something unless
         | I found it reasonable and not difficult for the other.
         | 
         | However, when someone asks me something I don't want to do, I
         | just say no, and don't think much more about it.
        
         | posterboy wrote:
         | One could argue that guessing _correctly_ does minimize the
         | inefficient communication.
         | 
         | I'm not sure this joke is appropriate: Man and wife sleep in
         | separate beds, the wife says. A friend asks, so how do you ...
         | you know? If he wants to, he whistles. And if you want to?
         | Well, I go over and ask if he whistled.
        
         | samus wrote:
         | > Ask questions, provide some basic context, and offer an
         | escape hatch: "What are you busy with? I need X because Y. It's
         | fine if you can't, I can also get it from Z".
         | 
         | The escape hatch could also just be a mere formality,
         | especially when there is a difference in power dynamics or
         | social rank. This is amplified in cultures where, for example,
         | the opinions and needs of elders rank higher.
        
         | visitect wrote:
         | This makes sense to me. I appreciate when somebody communicates
         | their needs in a straightforward way, but also demonstrates an
         | understanding that I might not be able (or willing) to
         | accommodate them. I try to practice this when asking for help.
         | Be clear, but empathetic. And I don't get angry if folks can't
         | help, and remember that everybody has far more going in their
         | lives than what I can see.
        
       | crawfordcomeaux wrote:
       | Would someone explain the difference between codependency and
       | "guess culture"?
        
         | prewett wrote:
         | Codependency is when one person gets value for solving other
         | people's problems for them ("saving" them), and the other
         | person gets value out of having their problems being solved by
         | other people (having a "savior").
         | 
         | Guess Culture is more of a strong value on considering the
         | needs of others. It _could_ be unhealthy: considering the needs
         | of others and neglecting your own, but it could also be
         | courteous consideration ( "they just got over being sick, I
         | won't ask them to help me move").
         | 
         | I suppose Guess Culture unhealthiness tends to be more
         | neglecting your own needs and desires (and the your resulting
         | hurt and anger that the other person needs to deal with), while
         | Ask Culture unhealthiness tends more towards lack of
         | consideration (ridiculous asks) or demanding (asks that have a
         | question mark but are not really questions).
        
       | wheelerof4te wrote:
       | No one will guess for you what your needs or reasons for doing
       | something are. You have to let them know.
       | 
       | The hard part is knowing when and how to ask your question.
        
       | darchws wrote:
       | As someone coming from a 'guess culture' and having a manager
       | from an 'ask culture,' one major problem I am having is not being
       | able to say 'no' to my manager. My manager always emphasizes the
       | importance of asking things around rather than expecting people
       | to just know how to help you. I know he also just asks me with
       | the expectation that I could say no, but I always feel like
       | letting him down if I say no. Therefore, I tend to overcommit to
       | things and work overtime. This looks good on performance (I
       | always got good feedback), but I'll probably burn out at some
       | point if I cannot get this communication right.
        
       | sikkolata wrote:
       | Life is already too hard, let's not bother ourselves by being
       | have to "guess" something.
        
       | EdgeExplorer wrote:
       | I think awareness is the main point here.
       | 
       | At some level, it doesn't actually matter if these labels are
       | correct or generalize a culture or anything else. It does matter
       | if people genuinely feel the things described and if other people
       | are genuinely unaware of those feelings.
       | 
       | We are each inherently limited in our perspective by being an
       | individual. It's helpful to be exposed to other ways of thinking,
       | and it's helpful to have ways of conceptualizing differences in
       | thinking for future reference.
       | 
       | "Ask/guess" doesn't have to be *true*, it just has to be useful
       | as a heuristic.
        
       | nostrademons wrote:
       | I've also heard of "Tell" culture. To use the moving example:
       | 
       | You call up your best friend and say, "Hey, I'm moving on
       | Saturday, come over and help me." Your friend either says "Sure,
       | I'd love to" or "Sorry, got a hot date, catch you at your
       | housewarming party."
       | 
       | Ironically, Ask culture is usually used in transactional settings
       | where you barely know someone, Guess culture is usually used in
       | smaller community settings where you have a lot of personal
       | context, but Tell culture (which is a level beyond Ask in
       | directness) is usually used _in intimate settings where you have
       | a strong bond with someone_ - either family or very close
       | friends. At that level of intimacy, it 's expected that someone
       | can say no to a direct request without hurting the relationship.
       | It's the same reason close friends frequently make fun of each
       | other or horse around in mock physical combat - it demonstrates
       | that your relationship is strong enough that insult doesn't hurt
       | it.
        
         | hosh wrote:
         | Also, in certain groups, people will deliberately troll each
         | other in order suss out how they'd act under pressure... and
         | whether they can be trusted to perform as part of a team under
         | pressure.
        
           | gottorf wrote:
           | Hazing is the term.
        
             | watwut wrote:
             | Hazing is about proving your lack of boundaries and proving
             | you are easy to make do what told. It is about picking
             | people who won't tell "no" and will act as enablers when
             | needed.
             | 
             | Which is why well run organizations do not engage in
             | hazing. While organizations that do it tend to be the ones
             | engaged in bullying in general - whether internal or
             | external.
        
           | watwut wrote:
           | None of that is about seeing a person under pressure, because
           | they do nothing useful with the information. At best,
           | information is ignored and at worst, used to pick bullying
           | targets.
        
       | snapetom wrote:
       | Wow, this strongly resonates with me, especially the tieback to
       | Asian cultures. I was both told many times, and shown by example
       | many times, that it was rude to put someone in awkward positions.
       | I still carry that to this day in personal relationships, and my
       | wife (white, US-born) doesn't understand why I don't just ask for
       | things from our families/friends, often going to great lengths to
       | avoid questions.
       | 
       | However, at work, I am definitely an "ask" person. I'm in
       | engineer that has spent a lot of time with sales people. "Make
       | them say no" is a mantra I use at work. It's more forward, more
       | aggressive, and American corporate culture, often necessary.
        
       | g9yuayon wrote:
       | I grew up in China and the guess culture was predominant there.
       | It was quite a culture shock after I came to the US. In a
       | training session back when I was in IBM, the VP of marketing told
       | us a story about the ask culture: he was an American-born
       | Japanese. When Lou Gerstner asked him what he wanted, he
       | instinctively tried to be humble. Lou cut him off and said: I
       | can't help you if you don't tell me what you want. Come back in X
       | months when you know the answer. The next time they met, the VP
       | told Lou that he wanted to be an executive, and he got promoted
       | soon. Another thing I learned in the training session was that
       | leaders have different styles but all the executives demonstrated
       | only one of the four key styles: direct and decisive.
       | 
       | As time went by, I found it was much easier to adapt to the ask
       | culture. I also found consistency matters more than the styles.
       | When I consistently ask with good intention, people would not
       | take offense.
        
       | chasing wrote:
       | I don't really care for the "Ask vs. Guess" framing.
       | 
       | More like "make demands without considering the other person at
       | all vs. think for a second about not imposing yourself on other
       | people unnecessarily."
       | 
       | But mostly this article is about the virtues of being a clear
       | communicator and having decent interpersonal skills, which is
       | neither an "ask" nor a "guess" thing.
        
         | aqme28 wrote:
         | I disagree with that framing even more. "Asking" is not "making
         | demands." Guess culture people only _think_ that asking is a
         | demand, because that 's Guess culture.
        
         | bitshiftfaced wrote:
         | It may be that both are thinking in terms of considering the
         | other person. People use their self as a reference point. When
         | you try to model in your head how someone will take your
         | request, you may be thinking in terms of how another _asker_
         | would take being asked a request. In that case, you would think
         | that the other person would be fine with it, since they 're
         | just as comfortable with asking for things that have a low
         | chance of being granted.
        
         | smeej wrote:
         | It's telling to me that I can't tell from your reframing which
         | side is which.
         | 
         | From my experience, I would assume the one not considering the
         | other person is the one in guess culture, assuming the other
         | person can and ought to read their mind, and the one trying not
         | to impose is the one who actually asks the other person for
         | their opinion or consent, but I can equally see it the other
         | way around, and think the opposite might actually be how you
         | meant it.
        
         | v3gas wrote:
         | You're clearly a Guess :)
        
           | chasing wrote:
           | I consider myself a staunch centrist on the "ask" vs. "guess"
           | scale. :-)
           | 
           | I ask all the time! And I'm totally comfortable with "no."
           | But I try to consider the other person first because I think
           | making unreasonable requests _repeatedly_ , which is the
           | subtext of their description of an "asker," blows social
           | capital and just bugs people.
        
             | skeaker wrote:
             | I think that's a given that needn't be mentioned in the
             | article. The author isn't stupid, and clearly wouldn't
             | advocate for making outlandish or completely unreasonable
             | requests even for the "askers" mindset.
        
           | cogman10 wrote:
           | No I'm a purple personality with IRWNVDEIS+ tendencies.
        
       | yaky wrote:
       | Having just re-read Ursula LeGuin's Left Hand of Darkness, it
       | seems that the guess culture from the arricle would apply to
       | shifgrethor, a "game" of social status, where a lot is said by
       | omission, and giving advice is viewed as an ultimate insult.
        
       | chromoblob wrote:
       | Guess in an intimate relationship / communication context, Ask
       | anywhere else.
        
         | ImPleadThe5th wrote:
         | Yeah I was kinda thinking both are useful and necessary in
         | different contexts. Seems strange to prefer one.
        
       | ajkjk wrote:
       | I strongly feel this article misses the point and ends up at a
       | harmful framing instead.
       | 
       | Consider the example in the article: "all the family members
       | insisted we don't drive up to visit our grandmother and see the
       | city instead, we did it anyway, everyone was glad we did".
       | 
       | Or the next example: "with guess-culture people isn't as simple
       | as asking people what they want to eat for dinner, because they
       | will not tell you what they actually want to want to eat for
       | dinner."
       | 
       | This person, imo, deeply does not understand what is happening in
       | these situations. They have a model of other people as "wanting
       | something but not being willing to say it", and then they solve
       | the puzzle of figuring out what it was, and the other person
       | appreciates it. But, IMO, those people didn't strongly want
       | something one way or the other. They're resisting an unhealthy
       | dynamic: that the writer just wants to know what someone _else_
       | wants for dinner, but doesn 't even want something for dinner
       | themselves.
       | 
       | What others are doing by not being willing to explicitly state
       | desires is they're refusing to play this game of telling you what
       | to do. They're doing this because it really doesn't _feel good_
       | for someone to repeatedly ask you what they should do. The asker
       | degrades themselves by pawning their agency off on someone else,
       | and spending time with them begins to feel like hanging out with
       | a robot: soulless, scripted, perfunctory.
       | 
       | That is: when you ask for permission to visit your grandmother
       | and then do it because people said to, or don't do it because
       | they didn't, you haven't demonstrated respect or kindness or
       | love; you haven't acted _human_ at all. You 've just performed a
       | mindless duty. Whereas if you decide to do it _yourself_ ,
       | because _you_ chose to, then you 've demonstrated something.
       | 
       | People are shirking at telling you what to do because they don't
       | want to be part of an icky transaction where somebody constantly
       | hands away their agency. They don't want you "guess", they want
       | you to stop asking for their permission to exist.
       | 
       | edit: I realized there's more in the article about the workplace
       | and it's wrong too! This is not healthy at work, but not for the
       | reasons the article thinks.
       | 
       | A person who goes around trying to get somebody else to tell them
       | clearly what to do, and never gets that and therefore thinks
       | they're having trouble with "ask culture", is a drain on the
       | organization, because the amount of work that gets done is often
       | proportional to _willpower_. Or call it  "initiative" or
       | something.
       | 
       | If you're leeching off other people's agency to do anything, then
       | you're draining their willpower and not helping much at all.
       | Likely they're totally exhausted of it and don't want to tell you
       | what to do anymore. Whereas if you start injecting willpower and
       | agency into the system the whole organization will pick up and
       | run with whatever you do (or course-correct if it's wrong, etc).
        
         | bjornlouser wrote:
         | > This person, imo, deeply does not understand what is
         | happening in these situations.
         | 
         | "... But all of the older relatives insisted we did not,
         | suggesting that instead we see the sights in San Diego, that we
         | take the kids to Sea World ..."
         | 
         | I think you're right. Her relatives were hoping she would guess
         | that they didn't want her to bring the kids.
        
           | ajkjk wrote:
           | Disagree; I just think this model of "guess culture" is
           | totally wrong.
        
       | AnimalMuppet wrote:
       | Very interesting. I think it's accurate, and I hadn't seen that
       | perspective before.
       | 
       | I personally operate mostly in the ask culture. But if I meet
       | you, I don't know if you're in the ask or the guess culture. And
       | it seems to me that I kind of have to operate in the mode of the
       | guess culture in order to find out which you are.
        
       | duxup wrote:
       | My guess culture in laws will not say where they want to go for
       | dinner, but they will raise endless hypotheticals about where
       | other people might want to go, even if other people didn't say
       | it.
       | 
       | That way the discussion never ends and we end up somewhere nobody
       | wants to go....
        
       | guy4242 wrote:
       | I'm from a guess culture. Then I went to an ask culture area for
       | work (Coastal California). I had an under-powered, slow computer
       | that I had to work on. When my manager found out, he was mad that
       | I never said anything and that I never complained about it. I was
       | shocked that he was mad. In the more rural area I was from, it
       | would have been rude to complain about the tools that the company
       | provided for you. You were told to just "suck it up", be quiet,
       | and quit complaining. Those who complained too much were usually
       | the first to get laid-off.
        
       | draw_down wrote:
       | [dead]
        
       | SeanAnderson wrote:
       | I always liked explaining this concept in terms of Christmas.
       | 
       | There are people who value getting the right gifts, tell others
       | verbally what they are interested in, and those people then buy
       | those gifts. There is very little mindreading and magic, but the
       | gifts almost assuredly are useful and loved.
       | 
       | There are people who value the magic of Christmas gifting.
       | Telling others what to buy is nonsense because the point isn't
       | the gifts themselves but the act of gifting. The joy is in seeing
       | who got you a gift and what the gift says of your relationship
       | dynamic.
       | 
       | Neither of these are wrong ways to approach Christmas, but you're
       | kind of a jerk if you think your vision of Christmas is the only
       | way.
        
       | overgard wrote:
       | Hmm, I know it's frowned upon generally to say one culture is
       | better than another, but I grew up in guess culture and I tend to
       | gravitate towards that naturally, but a lot of my maturing as an
       | adult has come from adopting more of ask culture and being more
       | direct.
       | 
       | Guess culture sounds exhausting _because it is_. I can 't count
       | the number of times I've had a resentment towards someone for
       | something they inadvertently did without even realizing. And the
       | converse is just as annoying, when someone is upset at you and
       | you have to play 20 questions to figure it out.
       | 
       | I think if you're high in agreeableness saying no to someone can
       | be hard, which is where guess culture comes from IMO; but on the
       | other hand, that's just a super important life skill even if you
       | are highly agreeable.
        
       | 0xdeadbeefbabe wrote:
       | I'd like to ask a question if I may, how can you get excited
       | about a culture that asks to ask?
        
       | sneak wrote:
       | > _Deciding what to eat for dinner with guess-culture people
       | isn't as simple as asking people what they want to eat for
       | dinner, because they will not tell you what they actually want to
       | want to eat for dinner. They will say "oh, whatever you want," or
       | "whatever is easiest." And when you insist that you really really
       | want to know what they want to eat for dinner, and if it's too
       | much work, you'll do something else instead, the response you
       | receive will already be a compromised version of what they want,
       | taking into account the preferences of everyone else in the
       | house, what the kids will eat, and the leftovers in the fridge._
       | 
       | Man, people are so bad at communicating.
       | 
       | I have found that a lot of communication from americans includes
       | hidden unsaid statements, which are frequently expected by the
       | speaker to be automatically inferred by the listener.
       | 
       | Alternately, plain speaking is heard by the american listener to
       | imply things that may not be intended at all.
       | 
       | It's somewhat baffling to me, so much so that I wrote a whole
       | article about it.
       | 
       | https://sneak.berlin/20191201/american-communication/
        
         | JadeNB wrote:
         | > Man, people are so bad at communicating.
         | 
         | I don't mean to say anything about you, but, as a saying with a
         | different word in it goes, if you meet one person who's bad at
         | communicating, then they're bad at communicating; but if
         | everyone you meet is bad at communicating ....
         | 
         | (I also wish people would communicate more clearly, but I have
         | to admit that what I _really_ want is that people would
         | communicate _in the way that 's easy for me_--I am not
         | operating from some absolute, logical standard. I also may be
         | coming from an unusual perspective because, as an academic, a
         | lot of my colleagues were not born in the US, so that cultural
         | backgrounds, and also the sometime preference in the sciences
         | for speaking that is direct to the point of abruptness, may
         | mean that I don't see the worst of what you do.)
        
           | pseudalopex wrote:
           | > I don't mean to say anything about you, but, as a saying
           | with a different word in it goes, if you meet one person
           | who's bad at communicating, then they're bad at
           | communicating; but if everyone you meet is bad at
           | communicating ....
           | 
           | Someone told him whenever someone makes a point, he seems to
           | react to a very specific, narrow, and marginal interpretation
           | of that point. And he reacted to a very specific, narrow, and
           | marginal interpretation of that point.
        
           | [deleted]
        
         | gsuuon wrote:
         | Really interesting to see the other side - I wonder if
         | sometimes the perception of 'high context' vs 'low context' is
         | really just 'not my familiar context' vs 'my familiar context'.
         | 
         | > Excuse me, ma'am. It seems to me that you're in a hurry. I
         | don't know how long this line will take, however, I am
         | reasonably certain that it will take the same amount of time
         | for you to reach the head of it whether you stand 5, 1, or zero
         | meters away from my bag, so I must request that you please stop
         | touching it.
         | 
         | This does seem a _bit_ aggro though, a friendlier way could 've
         | been to assume that she wasn't aware of the bumping and so
         | wasn't doing it on purpose. In the US if there's a gap in a
         | line and folks aren't closing it, that itself can be seen as
         | rude and not paying attention (whether it makes sense or not is
         | another matter). My personal guess is it comes from being
         | stopped at green lights where cars in front stay parked and
         | then you end up catching the red.
        
           | daotoad wrote:
           | Speaking as an American the bit that seems over the top is
           | the ""5, 1, or 0 meters" bit. It comes off as condescending.
           | At least from another American. I've known a few Germans and
           | this sort of comment seems much more acceptable to them. I
           | think it's seen as "this is my reasoning, with it you can
           | better evaluate the validity of my request".
           | 
           | Simply saying "please stop touching my luggage" is what I
           | would expect. Adding any reasoning or explanation increases
           | the emotional stakes and gives more places for people to
           | infer subtext.
           | 
           | I appreciate the directness of simply backing your request
           | with clear assertions as to why it is reasonable. Despite
           | this, it does feel a bit odd to hear.
        
       | harrylove wrote:
       | I love seeing the world through new frames like this. I think
       | it's refreshing, and forces a rethink of what I think I know.
       | 
       | At the same time, without a critical examination of the idea,
       | these things have a nasty habit of becoming the next
       | pseudoscience, like Myers-Briggs, learning styles, growth
       | mindset, and the like.
       | 
       | Identifying yourself or someone else as an Asker vs. Guesser to
       | explain behavior is about as helpful as identifying yourself as a
       | Sagittarius or Capricorn. Fun to think about occasionally, but no
       | basis in fact.
        
       | protastus wrote:
       | Very interesting framing for tension I experience as a manager,
       | but never saw formalized.
       | 
       | At work, ask culture puts higher burden on managers. Especially
       | when requests cross the line into unreasonable territory, and the
       | manager has to study the problem with objectivity, and politely
       | articulate why the request cannot be granted.
       | 
       | Example: request for time off overlaps with important
       | deliverables due by the requester. In guess culture, the
       | requester studies their schedule and does not make a request if
       | there's a conflict. In ask culture, the requester asks anyway and
       | if the manager approves, they have now entangled the manager into
       | what could be a bad business decision.
        
       | darkwater wrote:
       | How questions/requests work in the Mediterranean Europe:
       | 
       | - Hey can you do $WHATEVER for me? - Sure! - Really? Can you
       | really do this for me? - Well, actually I'm busy tonight so I
       | can't do it, sorry
       | 
       | Not answering "sure" the first time? Rude. Not asking for
       | confirmation? Rude.
        
       | mvnuweucxqokii wrote:
       | I think I default more to guess culture? I certainly don't ask
       | for help much--almost never--but I think that might be because
       | I'm very independent. My personal problem with ask culture is
       | when the relationship becomes very asymmetrical. Some ask culture
       | people that I know will freely make requests all the time. In
       | their minds, I assume, they'll get me back _when I ask for it_.
       | The problem is that I don 't ask for help, so instead I will help
       | them out a dozen times in a row, my frustration building all the
       | time, my opinion of them tending toward "freeloader".
       | 
       | My relationships that work well have a very strong unstated
       | premise of turn-taking. If my friend paid for lunch last time, of
       | course I'm getting it this time, and vice-versa--to me that's
       | just obvious. If I stay at someone's house while traveling, it
       | goes without saying that I will host them at my house (or return
       | the favor in some other way of equivalent value) before imposing
       | on them again.
        
       | sourcepluck wrote:
       | Did no-one else cringe at the gargantuan oversimplifications
       | necessary to keep this alleged cultural distinction afloat?
       | 
       | Was no-one else a little queasy seeing a U.S. person talk about
       | the entire continent of Asia - pushing towards 4.8 billion people
       | - as if they were an easily generalisable singular entity?
       | 
       | Seems utterly nuts to me. Perhaps it's related to the feeling
       | U.S. people sometimes seem to have that they aren't just the
       | centre of the world, but actually in some sense literally the
       | whole world. Or something else, I don't know.
        
       | charlieroth wrote:
       | As a person from the US who recently moved to Sweden, this
       | article has finally given me some words to explain the cultural
       | "clash" I experience at work that I could never quite explain to
       | myself or others.
        
       | willsmith72 wrote:
       | I felt this a lot as an Australian living in Germany. It's really
       | refreshing knowing someone will tell you what they honestly want,
       | and takes a while to get used to saying "no". Once you realise
       | it's not offensive to say no in "ask culture", I actually think
       | it's preferable, but I don't think I'll ever be completely
       | comfortable doing the "asking".
        
       | rconti wrote:
       | > Western society is very much ask culture.
       | 
       | I want to push back on this, but since I was raised in the US, I
       | don't feel like I have a leg to stand on. Perhaps it's _more_ ask
       | culture than the Japanese, but I still feel like it 's very
       | heavily on the Guess side.
       | 
       | This all resonates with me, though, because I haven't grown up
       | saying "no". My parents didn't ask much of me, but it didn't
       | cross my mind to say no to any request.
       | 
       | I have an in-law who feels extremely free to ask for unreasonable
       | things, and it's extremely hard to manage.
       | 
       | I think the comments in this piece about how the business world
       | works are the most insightful to me here. A good read.
        
         | brandonmenc wrote:
         | My family is American. My mom is "guess culture" and my dad is
         | "ask culture", both to an extreme. They were both born and
         | raised in the same town and have nearly identical ethnic and
         | socioeconomic backgrounds.
         | 
         | Not sure what goes on in other countries, but it's dealers
         | choice here in the States imo.
        
         | bb123 wrote:
         | I feel like British politeness is a huge counterpoint to this.
        
         | kdmccormick wrote:
         | To be completely anecdotal: I grew up, live, and work in
         | northeastern US, which according to this comment section seems
         | to be as ask-culture as it gets, but when I work with Europeans
         | I feel like _I 'm_ the one bumbling around with assumptions and
         | implicit context, whereas they are more comfortable plainly
         | asking for what they need and politely saying no.
         | 
         | (Or maybe it's function of who I work with from each continent?
         | I work with a range of seniority levels in the US, but the
         | European engineers I get to work with tend to be on the more
         | senior side, and I imagine western business experience and ask-
         | culture-adeptness are corollated).
        
           | samus wrote:
           | As an American interacting with Europeans in the US, you are
           | more in tune with the local culture than them. They are
           | probably aware that things are different from what they are
           | used to, thus Europeans (really, most outsiders) are more
           | likely to be up front when communicating with Americans.
        
         | jzb wrote:
         | I think "western society" is way too broad a brush. Within the
         | U.S. there's extremes between ask and guess, IME. (Some of that
         | is breaking down due to mobility... regional differences are
         | much less pronounced these days, I think, especially in cities,
         | since there's so much cross-pollination.)
        
           | bityard wrote:
           | Yeah, I feel like the point of the article was to recognize
           | that there are two sides to the framework with strong traits
           | on each end, but that most social interactions do (and
           | should) happen somewhere in the middle. The trouble tends to
           | crop up when two people who both away from the center in
           | opposite directions try to interact. (which can happen even
           | in well-established relationships.)
        
         | bee_rider wrote:
         | We've got some regional variation in the US, maybe this could
         | be one thing that varies?
         | 
         | New Englanders are famously less-chatty, but also quite direct,
         | so I'm not sure exactly how to map it to this ask/guess thing.
         | I think specifically the Yankee subculture tends toward guess.
        
         | munificent wrote:
         | I don't think you can make many country-wide generalizations
         | about this. My experience is that it varies widely by:
         | 
         | * Region
         | 
         | * Socioeconomic status
         | 
         | * Invidual psychology
         | 
         | The strongest "ask culture" people I've seen are poor people
         | with good self esteem who grew up in historically poor areas
         | like the South and stayed there. These people have a natural
         | sense of "we have to take care of each other", a long-term
         | commitment to their community, and an automatic understanding
         | that they have helped many others before and thus deserve help
         | in return.
         | 
         | The strongest "guess culture" people I've seen are wealthy
         | insecure people that have moved around a bunch. They are
         | financially secure enough to not need help most of the time,
         | and expect others to also take care of themselves. They don't
         | have the kind of long-term roots that make reciprocity feel
         | natural. At the same time, they do want connection and
         | community, so they work hard to try to understand the implicit
         | needs and desires of the other guess culture people around them
         | so that they can be helpful.
         | 
         | I'm definitely very far onto the guess culture side, but I know
         | that I would be healthier if I could be more ask culture.
        
           | ecairns wrote:
           | This seems very insightful to me. I think I'm another data
           | point that mostly fits your observations.
           | 
           | Individual psychology definitely plays a huge role with me
           | personally being on the far side of guess culture. I have
           | pretty extreme social anxiety and the idea of asking someone
           | for something fills me with dread every single time. Not
           | because it shows weakness (I think), but because I don't want
           | to impose on others. Asking someone I don't know for
           | something is almost impossible. I can barely do it in a
           | context where it's expected, like customer service.
           | 
           | I'm not wealthy, but I have moved around a bunch, especially
           | as a child. I'd absolutely help out anyone who asked for it,
           | but also try anticipate the needs of others.
        
         | candybar wrote:
         | I would go even further - it's complete nonsense. I'm going to
         | guess the author never wondered why Americans feel
         | uncomfortable asking for a discount at a store and would rather
         | just not buy when they would've happily bought it at half the
         | price, whereas in many parts of Asia, it's common for customers
         | to ask for what seem like outrageous discounts to a westerner.
         | Norms are highly contextual - in every culture there are things
         | you can ask for and there are things you can't - and there's
         | huge individual variation in the willingness to adhere to norms
         | and the willingness to make others uncomfortable to get what
         | you want.
         | 
         | > [Because of something something Asian culture] My parents
         | rarely had to make explicit asks of me,
         | 
         | It baffles me how anyone with any kind of awareness could write
         | this.
        
       | hgsgm wrote:
       | Why do people reblog old tropw essays, and why do they get
       | upvoted?
       | 
       | Such a waste of energy to prop up someone's attempt to build a
       | personal brand.
       | 
       | Cite your sources and contribute something new, or just share the
       | more original link.
        
       | gkoberger wrote:
       | This is one of those things that when I read it the first time
       | years ago, it genuinely changed my life. It made me understand
       | half the population. The way the two types interact is so
       | poignant.
        
       | galaxyLogic wrote:
       | Isn't it always better to try to guess how others might feel
       | about your request, and not make it if you think there is a
       | chance it would make people not answer your phone-call the next
       | time?
       | 
       | It feels especially bad when I think somebody may be trying to
       | take advantage of me being a nice person.
       | 
       | Confidence men - isn't that what this is all about? Somebody
       | wanting to gain your confidence (that they will somehow pay yo8u
       | back) so then they can take advantage of you?
        
       | [deleted]
        
       | lairv wrote:
       | The article make it look binary when in reality everyone is
       | guessing to a certain degree. No one has ever come up to me in
       | the street and asked for $1000. Everyone is guessing up to a
       | point, but when there's too much incertitude, some decide to ask
       | while others think it's better not to
        
       | jzb wrote:
       | "It's rude to put someone in a position where they have to say no
       | to you"
       | 
       | I feel this in my bones. When I was a kid my dad _went off_ on me
       | after we visited someone 's house and I saw cake on the counter
       | and asked for a slice. That was just unacceptable. (Context: He
       | was raised by people who lived through the depression. Food
       | scarcity was a real thing in living memory.)
       | 
       | Even though his reaction was way overboard, I still believe this.
       | Let people offer things, don't ask. (With a lot of caveats
       | depending on context...)
        
         | wccrawford wrote:
         | While I was studying Japanese, I learned that they go out of
         | their way to make it so the other person doesn't have to refuse
         | with a "no". For instance, they'll ask, "Do you not have X?"
         | instead of "Do you have X?" The person can answer "Yes, we
         | don't have it" or "It's over here".
         | 
         | I actually made this mistake, asking for a product directly
         | instead of negatively, when I was in Tokyo. The clerk took me
         | to the aisle and said, "If we had it, it'd be here." And there
         | was no space for it. Took me a couple times to realize what had
         | happened.
        
           | alexjm wrote:
           | I've heard that the "do you not have" phrasing was used in
           | polite Soviet-era Russian, leading to a joke about a customer
           | who walks into a shop and sees all the shelves are empty:
           | 
           | - Excuse me, do you not have any bread? - Sorry, this is a
           | butcher's shop. We don't have any meat. The bakery is across
           | the road. They're the shop that doesn't have any bread.
        
           | sircastor wrote:
           | There may be an obvious language barrier here, but the
           | coupling of a positive with a negative response feels very
           | odd to me in English. I'm reminded of the old song (it was
           | used for an advertising jingle for a product or company I
           | can't remember) "Yes, we have no bananas!"
           | 
           | Adjacently, I really dislike the courtroom phrasing "Isn't it
           | true?" that is sometimes depicted in legal dramas.
        
             | reddit_clone wrote:
             | Indeed.
             | 
             | >"Do you not have X?"
             | 
             | In my head it sounds belligerent and accusatory. While the
             | other form sounds polite.
             | 
             | This negative phrasing to induce a positive response, may
             | be a Japan only thing?
        
               | galaxyLogic wrote:
               | It's interesting, it somehow means you are agreeing with
               | them if they don't have it, so they don't have to feel so
               | bad about not having it.
        
               | contravariant wrote:
               | It's probably more like "You wouldn't happen to have any
               | X?". I assume the idea is that you put the emphasis on
               | the asker being the one to ask a silly question if they
               | indeed don't have it.
               | 
               | Maybe it also helps that all the sentence markers that
               | make a sentence polite, negative, interrogative all get
               | added on to the end (to the verb) in japanese, which
               | probably makes the construction slightly less awkward. In
               | this case it may go something like motsu (to have) ->
               | mochimasu (to have, polite) -> mochimasen (to not have,
               | polite) -> mochimasenka (to not have, polite,
               | interrogative).
               | 
               | I'm making a lot of assumptions here though, I don't know
               | if this is anywhere close to correct.
        
               | pulsarmx wrote:
               | "Do you guys not have phones?"
        
         | tempestn wrote:
         | And a polite way to do this is to suggest the thing you want,
         | rather than directly asking for it. You could complement the
         | cake - oh, that looks delicious; what's the occasion? Or, "I'm
         | moving next weekend - looking forward to the new place, but
         | it's going to be a big job!" It is uncomfortable being asked
         | something that you have to say no to, but that doesn't mean we
         | have to just hope people will guess our needs unassisted.
        
           | tomjakubowski wrote:
           | In "guess culture" they can't offer you help unless they're
           | certain you won't decline the offer. So they'd have to figure
           | out first if you're hiring movers, and if not ascertain
           | whether you already have enough friends helping you, and if
           | not _then_ they'd offer to help you.
           | 
           | I agree with the other commenters who say that guess culture
           | is exhausting.
        
             | tempestn wrote:
             | Maybe that's how it works somewhere, but it's hard for me
             | to imagine. It can definitely be an imposition to _ask_
             | someone directly for help moving, as indeed they might feel
             | obligated to agree. But it seems much less likely in a
             | real-world context that offering someone your help would
             | oblige them to accept. It's perfectly reasonable to explain
             | that you have it worked out already, so you appreciate the
             | offer but it's not necessary.
             | 
             | "Guess culture" could certainly be exhausting if you over-
             | complicate it like that, but it's not necessary.
        
         | njharman wrote:
         | I'm not spending game night constantly asking all my guests all
         | the possible things (water, caffeine, booze, food, bathroom,
         | chair, cushion, warmer, colder, more light, less light, music,
         | different music, louder music, quieter music, pet my dog, etc,
         | etc, fucking etc). If you want something, YOU ask for it, which
         | is polite.
        
         | chromoblob wrote:
         | And miss out a lot...
        
           | jzb wrote:
           | I can honestly say I don't regret a policy of not asking
           | people for things in general. If somebody wants me to have
           | some of their cake, or whatever, then I'm usually happy to
           | accept. But I can't think of a time when I am like "gee, I
           | missed out by not asking for that thing."
        
             | ddbb33 wrote:
             | The cake could also be asking for a raise, or a discount,
             | really any other any opportunity that's not as low-stakes
             | as an item of food
        
         | voxl wrote:
         | I suppose different people will have different tastes, but I
         | will never agree that this is rude and that you should not ask.
         | You should not be upset when declined, but that is another
         | matter.
        
           | jzb wrote:
           | The problem is that people _do_ get upset. Basically, you 're
           | forcing someone else to be the asshole by saying no or
           | justify why they don't want to share or do something.
           | 
           | Rudeness is, of course, a subjective thing. Some people think
           | it's rude to wear shoes indoors, some people think it's rude
           | to make specific gestures that are either OK or meaningless
           | to me.
           | 
           | My wife is an asker. It's a definite challenge at times...
        
             | galaxyLogic wrote:
             | The rude thing is to not offer any reward in return for
             | you, if you agree to their request.
             | 
             | It's just saying they want to take advantage of you if you
             | fall for it. Making such a request means that they are
             | happy to take advantage of you as long as you let them. Is
             | that unethical?
             | 
             | Think of it this way: You own a truly valuable stamp but
             | you don't know its value. Then somebody who knows its value
             | offers to exchange it for their stamp of much lesser value,
             | without telling you what they know about its value.
             | 
             | It may not be unethical, businesses are based on such
             | behavior. Buy low and sell high to make a profit. But when
             | you see such behavior by your friends or neighbors or
             | colleagues, be aware. They are the kind of people who are
             | happy to take advantage of you.
        
         | [deleted]
        
         | retrac wrote:
         | That may work relatively well with consumables like food. But
         | it extends in many directions. I have fans and a space heater
         | and extra blankets and etc. All of them are available for a
         | houseguest to use. Many of them are stored in the guest room.
         | 
         | I've had "guess culture" people stay over. Really, in my mind
         | they don't even need to ask. They're already welcome to take an
         | extra blanket. But they won't even ask, and they certainly
         | wouldn't presume. They are indeed waiting on me to say "oh, if
         | you're warm the fan can be plugged in, and there's some extra
         | blankets in the closet if you want". Though in my mind, I don't
         | need to say that. And if I don't say it they may go very
         | uncomfortable.
         | 
         | I'm most used to giving such reassurances to children, and to
         | give them to adults seems a little infantilizing. But that's my
         | relatively "ask culture" background in action, probably.
        
           | jzb wrote:
           | Well, exactly - it's about things like consumables where
           | you're asking to take something. For example, "may I have a
           | glass of water?" would have been fine with my dad. (And it
           | was drummed into me it's rude _not_ to offer somebody at
           | least a glass of water when they 're in your house!)
           | 
           | Basic comfort items where you're not using up someone's
           | limited resources == no problem.
        
           | themodelplumber wrote:
           | That's a great example. Unfortunately it's also not super
           | helpful to dichotomize the difference, because most people
           | are a mix of both in different ways.
           | 
           | For example, under extreme stress or illness, a lot of "ask"
           | people will turn into "guess what I want or life hates me"
           | people.
           | 
           | And it's not exactly unheard of for guessers to turn into
           | power-trippers under stress and become over-direct when just
           | a little bit of directness is a better idea.
           | 
           | Sometimes guessers even use this entire us-them concept as a
           | way to subtly preach to askers, but really it's a two-way
           | street. If you've ever lived or worked under an unethical or
           | abusive guesser, you may have developed a very strong sense
           | of the hypocrisy of the "askers are blunt and mean"
           | comparison which often comes out in discussions with
           | guessers.
           | 
           | Fortunately though there is a lot of nuance to work with on
           | both sides in most cases. (And again, dichotomizing this is
           | not great in so many ways)
        
           | robotresearcher wrote:
           | > to give them to adults seems a little infantilizing
           | 
           | The 'mi casa es su casa / make yourself at home' concept is
           | perfectly normal and won't cause offense to anyone, surely?
        
             | 9dev wrote:
             | I don't think that concept in itself causes offense, but
             | the fact that guests often don't dare to actually live by
             | it and prefer to be a little cold over an extra blanket...
        
           | linuxdude314 wrote:
           | Are they supposed to just know the blankets are in your
           | closet?
        
             | dahfizz wrote:
             | They're supposed to ask
        
             | dack wrote:
             | I think someone could say they are cold and ask for more
             | blankets, and the owner could say they don't have any more
             | blankets
        
           | bena wrote:
           | First, you should let people know, that if they need
           | anything, they can ask.
           | 
           | Then, there are levels. If it's just on the edge of being
           | colder than I'd like, I might not say anything because the
           | effort isn't worth it. It's 65 instead of 70, I'll live. But
           | if you ask me tomorrow how was it, I'll tell you, "Slightly
           | cooler than I'm used to, but no problem". And people will
           | make a fuss and say "Well, why didn't you _aaaassssk_ "
           | Because, like I also said, it wasn't a problem.
        
             | [deleted]
        
         | williamdclt wrote:
         | At the end of the day, if you're firmly on either end of the
         | spectrum it comes down to the same thing: you're putting all
         | responsibility of the social interaction on the other person.
         | Because your position is fixed and theirs is (possibly) not,
         | you're making it their fault if the communication style doesn't
         | work. It leads to much frustration on both sides.
         | 
         | In your example, if you have a fixed position of << Let people
         | offer things, don't ask >>, you're putting all responsibility
         | on the other person: they have to adapt to your style or
         | they'll be the bad guy. Even though the other end of the
         | spectrum (<< express your desires, don't make people guess >>)
         | is just as self-consistent and valid.
         | 
         | Camping at either end of the spectrum is putting yourself as a
         | victim, it's using the other person's brain rather than your
         | own to make the interaction pleasant. As in most things:
         | extremes and inflexibility don't work with the subtleties of
         | reality
        
         | trailingComma wrote:
         | It's rude to expect other people to be able guess what you
         | want.
         | 
         | If you want something, ask me. I don't have crippling
         | confidence issues so saying no is not a problem for me.
        
         | sneak wrote:
         | All good and meaningful relationships involve give and take,
         | and sometimes saying no, so this reduces to "it's rude to have
         | close human relationships with people" (because close human
         | relationships necessarily involve sometimes saying no).
         | 
         | There is an argument that such a worldview is slightly
         | pathological.
        
           | jzb wrote:
           | As I said upthread - lots of caveats and it's context
           | dependent. For one thing, this usually assumed there _was
           | not_ a  "close human relationship" but social situations
           | where you aren't that close.
           | 
           | It has to be _OK_ to say no. In many scenarios or cultures it
           | is considered rude to say no. So if you 're not able to
           | gracefully say no without being considered rude, it's
           | correspondingly rude to _ask_ because you 're basically
           | saying "do this for me or else you're rude."
           | 
           | It's not an ask at that point, it's a demand. If I'm the
           | asshole if I say no, then I don't want to be asked the
           | question in the first place.
        
           | samus wrote:
           | There are ways around that, by phrasing questions in a
           | different way so the other person does not have to respond
           | with a hard "no". Yes, this requires prior acquaintance with
           | that communication culture, and integration by relative
           | outsiders can be difficult.
        
             | wrboyce wrote:
             | Sorry but this is bullshit and putting the onus on the
             | wrong person. "No" is a complete sentence and I don't see
             | the problem with using it, if you do (after say, I've asked
             | for you a slice of cake) but can't think of another
             | phrasing ("I'm afraid not", "maybe after you dinner", "ask
             | your father"; there are endless possibilities - especially
             | when dealing with children) then the issue is your
             | vocabulary, and not my failure to bend over backwards
             | phrasing the question so do you don't have to say the,
             | apparently dreaded, word "no".
        
               | samus wrote:
               | I guess that is your background from a more "ask"-like
               | culture speaking, where things are put out more
               | explicitly. Meanwhile "guess"-like cultures value
               | "getting along" more highly and try to avoid the hard
               | "no". Yes, this often stems from different underlying
               | value systems that we might perceive as toxic.
        
         | gopher_space wrote:
         | My grandmother said you'd offer food to guests because you knew
         | they were hungry and they'd refuse because they knew you didn't
         | have enough for yourself. If you actually had enough food for a
         | meal you needed to convince your houseguest.
        
       | NeoTar wrote:
       | Isn't this just a manifestation of high-context versus low-
       | context cultures? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-
       | context_and_low-context...
        
         | jedberg wrote:
         | Yes, it's just another name for that.
         | 
         | But this article paints high-context as bad and low-context as
         | good, when they're really just different (and opposite ends of
         | a spectrum, not a black or white one or another).
        
           | bryanlarsen wrote:
           | Does it? That's not what I got from the article at all.
           | 
           | The author is from a "guess" culture trying to operate in an
           | "ask" culture world. She's adapting, but not because any
           | particular culture is better than the other, but because
           | "when in Rome, do as the Romans do".
        
             | jedberg wrote:
             | Multiple times it mentions that "guess culture" is
             | frustrating and difficult, and that she and her brother
             | prefer ask culture because it's easier.
        
               | samus wrote:
               | "Ask" culture is prevalent in places where people come
               | from diverse backgrounds. Cultures might also not be
               | uniformely "ask" or "guess" across all topics. Therefore,
               | when people with different value systems and
               | communication cultures meet, "guess" culture simply
               | doesn't work because other person's needs and intentions
               | are often unexpected.
        
               | xeromal wrote:
               | This comment is astute. Homogenous vs heterogenous
               | cultures. What flies in Los Angeles will not fly in
               | Tokyo.
        
           | IshKebab wrote:
           | It's definitely bad in a work context where clear and
           | effective communication is important.
           | 
           | You're probably thinking "but implicit communication is just
           | as effective!" but it definitely isn't. It's all about hints
           | and guessing motivations which is inevitably unreliable.
        
             | caminante wrote:
             | These are always fun "pop-sci" discussions, but the wiki
             | says this whole dichotomy has been debunked [0].
             | 
             | I can't think of any company that doesn't have some low-
             | context interfaces. It can be expensive for top executives
             | to constantly address every question with "clear and
             | effective communication." Some people make it look easy,
             | but it's hard!
             | 
             | [0]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-context_and_low-
             | context...
        
               | harrisi wrote:
               | Your link doesn't say "this whole dichotomy has been
               | debunked." From one of the sources:                   But
               | the fact that contexting has not been empirically
               | validated should not necessarily be construed as a
               | failure of the theory. ... Nonetheless, the contexting
               | model simply cannot be described as an empirically
               | validated model.
               | 
               | Which explicitly does not debunk it, but states that it's
               | not empirically validated. That doesn't mean it's
               | incorrect, although it could be.
        
               | caminante wrote:
               | Good point on nuance on a technical level, i.e., debunked
               | != failure to support relationship.
               | 
               | However, on a practical level, people throw this around
               | as if it were empirically supported (which doesn't seem
               | to be the case). If there have been hundreds of studies
               | failing to make the connection, I won't take the bet that
               | it will eventually get validated.
               | 
               | On a meta-level, that's also a weird quote.
               | 
               |  _> But the fact that contexting has not been empirically
               | validated should not necessarily be construed as a
               | failure of the theory_
               | 
               | Pick any theory. If you can't validate it, and plenty of
               | people have tried to validate it, then that's a failure
               | of the theory, right?
        
               | IshKebab wrote:
               | > Pick any theory. If you can't validate it, then that's
               | a failure of the theory, right?
               | 
               | Definitely not. There are a ton of theories that are very
               | difficult to validate because you simply can't run the
               | experiment due to practical or ethical reasons. That
               | doesn't mean they are invalid.
               | 
               | For example my theory that UBI is unworkable. Basically
               | impossible to prove because it's just too expensive to
               | ever run a _real_ UBI experiment.
               | 
               | Or the theory that eugenics would decrease genetic
               | illnesses. Good luck testing that!
               | 
               | Even a lot of basic and fairly self evident stuff is
               | difficult to actually prove when it involves people. Are
               | the gender biases of children (toy preferences etc)
               | innate? They definitely are but it's very difficult to
               | actually test.
        
               | caminante wrote:
               | _> There are a ton of theories that are very difficult to
               | validate because you simply can 't run the experiment due
               | to practical or ethical reasons._
               | 
               | But they HAVE run high/low context experiments.
               | 
               |  _> For example my theory that UBI is unworkable.
               | Basically impossible to prove because it 's just too
               | expensive to ever run a real UBI experiment._
               | 
               | Are you referring to Universal Basic Income? If so,
               | countless experiments have been run. [0]
               | 
               | [0]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_basic_income_p
               | ilots#...
        
               | carabiner wrote:
               | I worked at an Indian tech consulting firm. Even though
               | India is considered a high context culture, our working
               | environment felt fully low context with endless meetings
               | trying to get all stakeholders on the same page, clearing
               | out assumptions, nailing down timelines and aligning
               | resources. When I moved to a normal US company it felt
               | like downright mind reading how we got shit done much
               | faster because we did have a much larger shared context.
               | So it's all relative and I bet American culture feels
               | like high context to others, and those guys are
               | astonished we can work without more hashing out than we
               | do.
        
               | caminante wrote:
               | I agree.
               | 
               | I was critiquing the parent and indirectly asking for an
               | example of a firm that has *ONLY* "high context." Things
               | become very abstract with unwritten rules as you move up
               | the org chart.
        
               | opportune wrote:
               | I think what makes the topic complicated is that the high
               | vs low context dichotomy is actually split across
               | multiple dimensions rather than being an overarching
               | single dimension.
               | 
               | For example, in educated coastal-liberal California
               | asking for favors or for hospitality (eg can I get a
               | glass of water) is low context but certain topics like
               | religion or most politically controversial things are
               | generally off limits. Conversely in the South,
               | hospitality has a decent number of high context
               | expectations, but religion or political discussion are
               | more acceptable for discussion. And of course every
               | culture has common cultural/historical references that
               | are implicitly known and sometimes implicitly referenced
               | without explicitly making the reference or expanding on
               | all the details.
               | 
               | That's why I think a lot of cultures see themselves as
               | low context compared to others, except perhaps the most
               | pathologically high context ones (Japan), because we all
               | have blind spots about where we're actually high context.
        
             | opportune wrote:
             | Mm, not necessarily all work contexts IMO, I just think
             | it's particularly helpful in software because software
             | itself is highly semantic and software teams tend to not
             | all come from the same exact background.
             | 
             | If you were doing something like sales, where both all your
             | salesmen and clients were locals with the same social
             | expectations on how to communicate implicitly, there
             | wouldn't be any direct benefits to trying to communicate
             | explicitly, and doing so may come across as rude or
             | offensive.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-08-18 23:00 UTC)