[HN Gopher] IP Address Blocking Banned After Anti-Piracy Court O... ___________________________________________________________________ IP Address Blocking Banned After Anti-Piracy Court Order Hit Cloudflare Author : weinzierl Score : 76 points Date : 2023-08-19 20:14 UTC (2 hours ago) (HTM) web link (torrentfreak.com) (TXT) w3m dump (torrentfreak.com) | chaxor wrote: | I always assumed businesses such as Cloudfare or Google would | have a good reason to be the main IPFS or tor node hosts, since | that can help improve the backbone infrastructure for this side | of of the internet, and can also help catch bad actors if there | are any there (easily turn in all logs to three letter agencies | if they knock, or they can simply offer it up for anon tips). | jrockway wrote: | Why can't they discover the IP addresses of the backend and block | those? | | It wouldn't work very well, but then they won't ask again next | time. | LilBytes wrote: | [delayed] | veave wrote: | IP address blocking may have been banned, but DPI to block | domains based on SNI is alive and kickin'. | | I've seen people talk about encrypted SNI for a very long time | now and it's still not working; someone must have dropped the | ball pretty hard regarding that | dilyevsky wrote: | there was a pushback from vendors who drumroll.... sell dpi | ls612 wrote: | ECH seems to have been rolled out in browsers as dev features | so idk what the real blocker is anymore. | getcrunk wrote: | > According to reviews conducted by local telecoms regulator TKK, | the IP address blocking violated net neutrality regulations and | will no longer be allowed. | | Thank god for net neutrality. We of course have that here in | America right? Cus freedom! | msla wrote: | https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/22/technology/montana-net-ne... | | https://www.multistate.us/insider/2018/1/24/montana-leads-st... | | Montana's had it since 2018, which was a first: | | > Montana Governor Steve Bullock (D) signed an executive order | requiring internet service providers (ISPs) with state | contracts to adhere to "net neutrality." The state became the | first to enact such measures in response to the Federal | Communications Commission's (FCC) decision to repeal net | neutrality rules last December. | astrange wrote: | Yes, we do have that. It's at the state level. | notamy wrote: | In Austria. | oxygen_crisis wrote: | > [Austria's] Telekom Control Commission found a violation of | Article 3 Paragraph 3 of Regulation (EU) 2015/2120, because the | IP access block poses the risk of 'overblocking' any website | content. | | Since the blocking was illegal per the European Union's | regulations, presumably any other EU nation would have to enact | similar decisions if this blocking was done elsewhere in the | EU. | tuetuopay wrote: | > When the ISPs discovered that the IP addresses belonged to | Cloudflare, arms were thrown up in despair. | | The level of desperation the ISP's engineers have felt in front | of such incompetence must have been through the roof. I am | getting tired of our politics here in europe: tech literate | people in governments are put to work on surveilance stuff, never | for actual policymaking. | | The shit show continues. | gsich wrote: | The ISPs didn't discover this, they knew. But it was mandated | so they had to do it. | veave wrote: | >The level of desperation the ISP's engineers have felt in | front of such incompetence must have been through the roof. | | If I was an engineer there I would block the addresses and call | it a day. What do I care? After all it's customer service who | will deal with the angry calls. | clnq wrote: | [delayed] | worewood wrote: | Looks like my job. The best way to change stupid procedures is | following them to the letter and watch the world burn. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-08-19 23:00 UTC)