[HN Gopher] Chemists develop new way to split water ___________________________________________________________________ Chemists develop new way to split water Author : geox Score : 63 points Date : 2023-09-06 11:43 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.uni-muenster.de) (TXT) w3m dump (www.uni-muenster.de) | pbhjpbhj wrote: | Couple of quotes from the OP: | | "To produce hydrogen, water (H2O) can be converted into hydrogen | gas (H2) by means of a series of chemical processes. However, as | water molecules are very stable, splitting them into hydrogen and | oxygen presents a big challenge to chemists. For it to succeed at | all, the water first has to be activated using a catalyst - then | it reacts more easily. A team of researchers led by Prof. Armido | Studer at the Institute of Organic Chemistry at Munster | University has developed a photocatalytic process in which water, | under mild reaction conditions, is activated through triaryl | phosphines and not, as in most other processes, through | transition metal complexes." | | Also: | | "Dr. Jingjing Zhang, who carried out the experimental work, adds: | "The hydrogen atoms of the activated water can be transferred to | alkenes and arenes under very mild conditions, in so-called | hydrogenation reactions." Hydrogenation reactions are enormously | important in pharmaceutical research, in the agrochemical | industry and in materials sciences." | | Suggesting applications might relate more to hidden enrichment | than hydrogen gas production per se? | [deleted] | fakedang wrote: | On a tangential note, how do you pronounce the second | researcher's name? Zhang as to my knowledge is pronounced with | a distinct "Jha" aspirated sound, correct? | | Back to the article though, from what I understand, the alkenes | and arenes merely act as the catalyst for the reactions, so the | article calling them the equivalent of hydrogenation reactions | seems incorrect. Perhaps, a more equivalent term would be | temporary hydrogenation. | earthboundkid wrote: | It sounds sort of like "Jong" or "Chang" with the a sound | from Spanish not the a in "cat", but most Americans pronounce | it like zang rhymes with tang, and mostly no one complains | about it. I had a Chinese American friend who mostly | introduced herself with the wrong pronunciation but after we | talked about it, I saw her do an introduction with the right | pronunciation. It's a hard problem because there's very | little sound overlap between English and Mandarin, and this | is made worse by using Pinyin spelling, which is designed for | use by native speakers and not English speakers. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zhang_(surname) | | One solution would be to translate it to Archer. :-) | amluto wrote: | I can't make heads or tails of this, since Chinese | pronunciation and romanized spelling is all over the map. | | If the name is expected to be read as Mandarin (which is | reasonably likely but not at all certain), written in | Pinyin (which is likely), then, with a mild Taiwanese | Mandarin accent, it would be fairly close to "jaw" but with | an ng sound at the end instead of a w. If it's pronounced | with an accent from closer to Beijing, then the initial | consonant would be retroflexed, which doesn't occur in | English. It sounds a bit like "zhrrrr" where the "zh" part | is somewhat similar to the j in jaw. If it's a stronger | Taiwanese accent, the initial consonant could be more like | "dz". But it could be something else entirely. | | Then there's the tone, and the tone mark is missing | entirely. It's highly unlikely that this means it's 5th- | tone (as it would be if it were real Pinyin), and it's | probably first tone in this case. You can find guides | online. | wanderlust2021 wrote: | How much of a progress is this? Anyone here that can add | insights? | kiloDalton wrote: | The paper isn't about splitting water to yield hydrogen and | oxygen gas which would be useful for energy applications. It's | about a new way to make radical hydrogen (1 protein plus 1 | electron) which is useful for synthesizing some organic | compounds. It will be helpful for synthetic chemists and will | make it easier to explore hydrogen radical chemistry. It may | replace some processes that currently require transition metal | catalysts, especially Samarium which is a rare earth element. | blacksqr wrote: | Anything that creates hydrogen radicals could conceivably be | used to construct electricity-producing fuel cells. | | Fuel cells normally radicalize hydrogen by contacting | hydrogen with platinum catalysts under extreme conditions, | requiring expensive and tricky design. | | If this new process can do the same in mild conditions with | inexpensive organic catalysts under exposure to light, it | could lead to more economical fuel cell designs. | Filligree wrote: | > 1 protein plus 1 electron | | Assuming that was autocorrupt. :) | | But 1+1... isn't that just normal hydrogen? Is the point that | it's atomic, not H2? | Someone wrote: | Indeed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radical_(chemistry) | | _"In chemistry, a radical, also known as a free radical, | is an atom, molecule, or ion that has at least one unpaired | valence electron. With some exceptions, these unpaired | electrons make radicals highly chemically reactive. Many | radicals spontaneously dimerize. Most organic radicals have | short lifetimes."_ | kiloDalton wrote: | I wish I could blame autocorrect. Just had proteins on the | brain and typed the wrong word. If it wasn't obvious, | protein --> proton | Eric_WVGG wrote: | Looks like the guys at Klei and _Oxygen Not Included_ are gonna | have to work this into a new point release! | https://www.klei.com/games/oxygen-not-included | [deleted] | dylan604 wrote: | To do this, what level of distillation needs to be reached? When | breaking the bonds in a water molecule, what happens to the | impurities in the water? | mcpackieh wrote: | I guess we can now look forward to a new wave of scams promising | to break the laws of thermodynamics to get free energy from | water. | nashashmi wrote: | Yup transport hydrogen up a pipe, convert to water and extract | electricity, and then use gravity forces to turn the turbine, | then convert back to hydrogen, repeat. | whoomp12342 wrote: | I, for one, cannot wait to purchase dehydrated water. | foobarian wrote: | Has been available for a while. E.g. | https://www.rei.com/product/109906/aquatabs-water- | purificati... | dylan604 wrote: | It's great for backpacking as it weighs much less and takes | up less space in your pack. All you have to do is add water, | shake it up, and your drink is ready in less than 15 seconds. | Maybe the astronauts can take advantage too. | conanite wrote: | you laugh but i've always thought it would be great to | carry a kilo of pure hydrogen in my backpack - just burn it | to obtain like 5 litres of water ... I mean why are we | carrying all that oxygen in our backpacks when he | atmosphere has a plentiful supply of it... | solardev wrote: | Maybe we need mini packblimps that can not only carry | fuel, but part of the pack, the dog, the kid, etc. It | could have AI assisted propeller machetes to hack away at | wayward branches, geofenced to protect endangered flora | of course. | | Then if you add some condensing coils and a transparent | roof, you could also just leave the backpacking food in | there and it'll slowly get moist and solar cook. After a | twelve hour hike you'd get lukewarm edible mud, mmm. | | Explosions are a minor risk, but if you can make water | out of the hydrogen anyway, surely you can put out any | resultant wildfires. | | Cyberpunk Smokey would be proud. | dylan604 wrote: | Have you ever actually seen a canister of hydrogen? | Specifically, have you ever felt the weight of that | canister? I'd rather just carry the 8lbs of a gallon of | water. At least it gets lighter as the water is depleted | sp332 wrote: | Just put the hydrogen in a balloon and it will carry | itself. | dylan604 wrote: | Just remember, the flame from hydrogen is clear and very | hard to see until it catches other things on fire. At | that point, it's well past too late | toast0 wrote: | Just need a longer string for the balloon and it'll be | ok. And hike in places with less trees (although, after a | few mishaps, the trails you frequent will have less | trees, too). | whatshisface wrote: | Carbon is lighter than oxygen, so their plan would work | if they brought fully saturated hydrocarbons including | ones so long-chain that they were solid at room | temperature. | dylan604 wrote: | You just described coal. So, you're suggesting taking | coal on a backpacking trip along with a very heavy | canister of hydrogen. To make water? Anything else you | want to do to help destroy the environment you're | backpacking through? | | You realize this whole thread started with the concept of | dehydrated water, right? | whatshisface wrote: | Saturated hydrocarbons contain hydrogen. That is what the | carbon is saturated with. Coal is not saturated. | [deleted] | Filligree wrote: | Well, the same amount of hydrogen (as in 1kg of water) in | the form of methane only weighs ~450g though. And | methane, conveniently, turns into H2O when burned. | | So in principle you could carry a bottle of methane and | burn that to get water. ;-) | [deleted] | dylan604 wrote: | roughly half the weight, plus the weight of the burner | equipment. again, that weight still remains even after | the supply of fuel to make water is depleted. a just of | water gets lighter. by the end of the hike, this is very | much a nice quality | Aachen wrote: | Where do you find 550g lighters? Surely a pocket lighter | to save half a kilogram of water is worth it | dylan604 wrote: | What do you expect to do, open the valve, flick a Bic, | and the water is going to start flowing? Come on. This | was a fun nonsensical thread, and you're now trying to | turn it into a magic trick rather than goofy science. You | have to capture the flame's exhaust, pressurize it, and | whatever other sciencey stuff to get the waste into a | liquid | marcosdumay wrote: | > pressurize it | | You "just" have to capture and cool it down. | | I mean, it's completely outside of viability, but it's | not breaking ground science. You could do it perfectly | well in a lab (if you had any reason to). | dylan604 wrote: | There's a lot of things that can be done in a lab, but | bringing it to the real world is totally different. | Nevermind fitting this in the original concept of | backpacking | [deleted] | [deleted] | FreshStart wrote: | The monthly hydrogen article, the carbon industry is alive and | well. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-09-06 20:00 UTC)