[HN Gopher] A small-town police officer took down a large match-... ___________________________________________________________________ A small-town police officer took down a large match-fixing ring in tennis Author : saeedesmaili Score : 62 points Date : 2023-09-08 11:49 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (www.washingtonpost.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.washingtonpost.com) | RcouF1uZ4gsC wrote: | > Borremans was a tall, slender man with searching blue eyes and | a bald head who cycled 40 miles to and from work every day. He | was the son of a cheese vendor. Borremans joined the police force | at 19 and worked for years in a carjacking unit. Once, he broke | up a criminal network trafficking luxury cars between the Belgian | port city of Antwerp and the Democratic Republic of Congo. | | Does that paragraph strike anyone else as strange being in a top | tier newspaper like The Washington Post? It reads like a grade | school essay where the student is trying to stuff a bunch of | miscellaneous facts into a paragraph rather than the polished | prose you usually see in a top tier newspaper. | cafard wrote: | I have been reading The Washington Post regularly for 45 years, | and very little that I encounter in it surprises me. It has | never seemed particularly well edited. | janc_ wrote: | It sounds like a journalist trying to sketch a background, to | make the story relatable to ordinary readers. You don't have to | be a superhero to do your job well... | bizzybez wrote: | Not unusual at all for long-form journalism. | rootsudo wrote: | Just amazing how much work goes into, something that isn't | really, that worthwhile. | | So one match fixing ring is down for the count and.... This | solves what? "Repetitional risk of tennis? | | The only interesting thing is how cheap it is to get a player to | throw a match. $40,000 high end, average 10,-15,000. Us dollars. | | But maybe I'm confused. Is this really a crime? | sidewndr46 wrote: | I've never really understood why match fixing or throwing a | match would be a crime. It takes what is a private matter | between competitors and a league organizer and makes it a | public matter that the courts supposedly can deal with. | | If it was a private matter leagues would be inclined to either | self-police the behavior or just admit the whole thing is | rigged. I mean, WWE seems to do just fine with a completely | fixed system. | raincom wrote: | It is a 'crime against sports'! | jstarfish wrote: | > I've never really understood why match fixing or throwing a | match would be a crime. | | It's institutionalized fraud, and a fundraising method for | organized crime. | | > WWE seems to do just fine with a completely fixed system. | | Nobody is currently permitted to wager anything on those | fixed WWE matches. | | As with all other regulations intended to protect idiots from | themselves, the industry is looking to repeal it. | sidewndr46 wrote: | I'm fine with banning all forms of gambling in the United | States | throw101010 wrote: | Would prohibition really work? It's not like there isn't | already a large network of illegal betting in place for | all the bets that can't happen legally... it would simply | make them thrive even more. | | Making things illegal/banned might feel good at first, | but if it's barely enforceable and/or the demand for that | thing remains very high all you are doing, as a state, is | foregoing on a lot of taxes while not even diminishing | harm often (sometimes even causing your own harm... I'm | looking at you "war on drugs"... and before that the | alcohol prohibition). | FridayNightTV wrote: | [flagged] | rootsudo wrote: | Me too. But how do we differ economic gambling vs sports? | Only allowed to do it through a broker and not a casino? | sidewndr46 wrote: | I don't know what you mean by economic gambling | rootsudo wrote: | Speculation. Stock markets, futures, options, etc. | smcin wrote: | 'financial speculation' | callalex wrote: | Prediction Markets come to mind as an egregious example. | freeopinion wrote: | Let's say we have a game with time running out and the | winning team has the ball. They can take a knee and win | by 10 or they can kick a field goal and win by 13. They | can dribble out the last 7 seconds and win by 8 or they | can shoot a 3 and try to win by 11. | | If they are good sports and just kill the clock, is that | fraud? If somebody pays them to kill the clock and not | cover the spread, is that fraud? | | Is risk of somebody manipulating the outcome like this | just part of what makes it a gamble? | smogcutter wrote: | > If somebody pays them to kill the clock and not cover | the spread, is that fraud? | | Yes. It's called point shaving and it is fraud. | simplicio wrote: | I think the problem is that, historically, leagues claim to | self-police but then the amounts of $ involved ends up | meaning enough individuals can be bribed/threatened/etc. that | "fair" matches end up fixed. In the best case, this ends up | as fraud and so ends up in the courts anyways, in the worst | case, the amounts of $ at play mean people turn to violence | and...well that ends up in the courts. So think the idea is | that we're better off just making it a public matter from the | start, rather then waiting till things escalate into other | forms of crime. | rootsudo wrote: | "WWE seems to do just fine with a completely fixed system." | | Exactly, that's what I don't get. Is the criminal act that | it's a 3rd party person and not the league itself? | mistrial9 wrote: | corruption is a team sport | smcin wrote: | You cannot legally wager on WWE anywhere in the US, | currently (or I imagine anywhere outside it either). | [https://www.forbes.com/betting/novelty/wwe/] I didn't know | anyone took it seriously as a sport, let alone would want | to bet on it. But apparently yes. It's hilarious to hear | the term _" Academy Awards... a fixed entertainment | event"_. (Waiting for cynics to mention elections.) | | > _According to a March 2023 CNBC report, WWE--which | produces fixed sports-style events such as WrestleMania and | Royal Rumble--wants to quell gambling regulator concerns by | reducing the chances that high-profile match outcomes leak | to the public._ | | > _WWE is "working with" the accounting firm EY, better | known as Ernst & Young. EY and rival PwC have helped | safeguard results for the Academy Awards, a fixed | entertainment event available for wagering in select sports | betting states. As it stands, betting operators like | DraftKings Sportsbook, FanDuel Sportsbook, BetMGM | Sportsbook and Caesars Sportsbook have offered limited | wagering on the Oscars._ | | > _WWE, which agreed to merge with UFC... is reportedly | pursuing regulated wagering in CO, IN, MI. However, | multiple state gambling regulators disputed the CNBC report | that used anonymous sources._ | mrob wrote: | It should be handled by civil law. The leagues sell tickets | to fair competition. If the players fix the match, then the | league is selling a defective product, and common sense | suggests they should refund the ticket sales. And the players | were presumably contracted to provide fair play, so if they | damage the league by breech of contract then common sense | suggests the league should be able to sue the players | responsible for the cost of the refund. They could require | players to take out insurance to ensure they'll always be | able to pay. | | Making it a criminal matter is just a subsidy to the gambling | industry. | vericiab wrote: | The second sentence of the article is | | > A strange tip had arrived from Belgium's gambling commission. | | I can't speak to Belgium specifically, but in many areas one of | the responsibilities of the gambling/gaming commission is | ensuring "fair" gambling. So they probably care more about the | impact of match fixing on the "fairness" of sports betting | rather than the reputational (I assume that's what you meant | rather than "repetitional") risk to any particular sport. | | When betting is involved, I don't see match fixing as all that | different from someone bribing a casino employee to use dice | loaded in their favor or help them cheat in a game of cards. Or | depending on who's involved, maybe it's more like the casino | using dice loaded in the casino's favor. | | In any case I think it basically amounts to fraud. The | published odds are inaccurate because the outcome has been | fixed, allowing the people aware of that to make money at the | expense of the people unaware. Fraud is generally a crime, so | as long as the match fixing isn't reflected in the published | odds IMO it isn't all that surprising that it's a crime. | likeclockwork wrote: | The sports contest is not a gambling game though or even | inherently part of one. The players are not casino employees | of any kind. | | The fact that a person can bet on anything that doesn't make | influencing the outcome of events generally a crime. | | Influencing outcomes is a natural response to wagering on | outcomes. If that's fraud and unsavory then maybe the problem | is the actual institution of gambling and not the manner in | which people choose to participate. | | (I'd also apply this argument to whether insider trading or | stock manipulation should be illegal.) | goodbyesf wrote: | > So they probably care more about the impact of match fixing | on the "fairness" of sports betting | | Not the 'fairness' of sports betting, but the impact on the | sports betting industry. If people think sporting matches are | fixed, they will stop gambling which is bad news for the | gambling industry. It's why the NFL, which is now in bed with | the gambling industry, is so paranoid about players gambling. | It not only is bad for the NFL, but especially so for the | gambling industry they are partnering with. | eszed wrote: | >Is this really a crime? | | Looks like it is: | https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/224 | smcin wrote: | Why would you answer a question about the legality of match- | fixing in Belgium at Belgian/European sports betting | operators, with a citation from US law? | | The question asked "Is this a crime", not "Would this be a | crime _if done in the US?_ " | | (Counterfactual: "Why Kinder Surprise Eggs are Illegal in the | U.S.": https://www.distractify.com/p/why-are-kinder-eggs- | illegal. Short answer: banned since 1997 by US CPSC, under a | 1938 US law passed in response to antifreeze in an antibiotic | medication.) | rcme wrote: | Yes, it is a crime. First, the money being paid out to the | fixer doesn't appear out of thin air. There is a counterparty | to the transaction that is literally being stolen from when the | fixer fixes a match. But more importantly, this is likely being | done to launder money. Dirty money goes to the players and | clean money comes to the fixers in the form of gambling | winnings. | mschuster91 wrote: | > There is a counterparty to the transaction that is | literally being stolen from when the fixer fixes a match. | | Not really. Almost no real persons bet on obscure low rank | tennis matches... the betting companies know exactly what | their role in all of this is, they won't bat an eye unless | you completely screw over their financials or draw attention | to them - all in all, they still make a fuckton of money. | | Most importantly, the "gamblers" usually hedge their bets in | the case of something going wrong unexpectedly. That keeps | the risk low on average for the "gamblers", the loss from the | betting service's profit and taxes (aka the spread between | win/loss quotas) is way cheaper than other commonly used | forms of money laundering. | | Hell, you can launder money with gambling just fine even if | you're not involved in fixing matches. Been a decade ago | since I had someone explain this to me (I worked in a | bar/slot machine joint, adjacent to a betting place), but in | general it works by having a ton of people, immigrants from | the mastermind's network, using combination bets (e.g. 4 out | of 6) with "safe" bets (i.e. pay-outs just an inch above pay- | in). They would get 1000EUR in the morning, spend all their | day at the betting place, and return the money and betting | slips to account for it. Even if they'd lose a few hundred, | the bosses didn't care as long as they got the slips to back | it up. Cops can't do a thing as the bets are all legit and | taxes been paid. | quickthrower2 wrote: | I don't get it. If this is true why don't the betting | companies just not offer low ranking matches? | EricDeb wrote: | Tennis players make like no money unless you are top 80 in the | world so yea I imagine it wouldn't cost much to get a match | thrown | cvccvroomvroom wrote: | https://archive.ph/i0lx1 | [deleted] | seeknotfind wrote: | Largest KNOWN match-fixing ring in tennis. | dang wrote: | Ok, we've made it just large in the title above. | paganel wrote: | This is just scratching the surface, if that. | | Just the previous weekend I heard a guy I knew talk about how he | was in the stands at a women't ITF tournament match in a middle- | sized city here in Romania. | | The "stands" is a big word according to him, there were the two | players on the field, their respective coaches and a fence-like | structure which separated this guy, one of the couple of | spectators there, from the match itself. He was telling us how he | could bet during the match for "esoteric" things like what player | was going to break next and things like that, and that he made a | nice chunk of money betting that the match was going to be a | succession of break games. He was also telling us how both of the | coaches were also on their phones throughout the match, most | probably not to instant message or to post on social media. | | Online sports betting has ruined sports. | janc_ wrote: | Most ITF players can't afford coaches to travel with them; you | really need to play ATF/WTA successfully or have a rich sponsor | for that... | | (And by "successfully", I mean you have to be top-100 , or at | least close to it) | paganel wrote: | They were probably close family or something similar, which | substitutes for coaching for many such players anyway. | janc_ wrote: | Or the "coaches" were self-funding... | | Unfortunately, the financial difficulties of being a player | outside top-100 invite organized crime involvement like | this... | 3seashells wrote: | So jam comes, ruin bets? | rcme wrote: | So the lackey gets 5 years in prison, the players are let off the | hook and the mafia directing and financing the operation isn't | even investigated. Is organized crime a joke in Europe? | Apparently millions of dollars were being laundered through this | scheme. How much illegal activity went into generating the | capital? | rurban wrote: | Organized crime seems more like a joke in the US. There they | did nothing at all | vuln wrote: | > Organized crime seems more like a joke in the US. There | they did nothing at all | | That just, your opinion, man. | kjkjadksj wrote: | Italy would like a word. | nomat wrote: | apparently corruption runs rampant throughout all of europe. | from the banks that facilitate the laundering of funds, to the | port authorities that allow boatloads of cocaine from Colombian | cartels, to the criminal states like albania. DW has a video | called "The cartels of Marseille" that goes into the drug side | of it. but of course there is art, human trafficking, weapons | dealing, etc. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-09-09 23:00 UTC)