[HN Gopher] A clever "perpetual motion" device [video] ___________________________________________________________________ A clever "perpetual motion" device [video] Author : ed_westin Score : 115 points Date : 2023-09-14 18:44 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com) | p1mrx wrote: | Be aware that most of the cheap knockoffs just use a motorized | wheel. For example, see the videos on | https://www.amazon.com/dp/B09VTJ4LZ8/#ive-videos-for-this-pr... | BugsJustFindMe wrote: | They also use diagrams showing the ball traveling the wrong | way. https://imgur.com/a/o3sHFhX | tempestn wrote: | Huh, I'd always assumed the ball simply closed a circuit when it | rode on the rails, and that's how it knew when to turn the magnet | on and off, with suitable delays. It does seem to me you could | still do it that way, but it'd probably be more difficult. | [deleted] | owenpalmer wrote: | Steve Mould is top-notch | martinmunk wrote: | This one is pretty good, but I usually steer clear of his | videos. Topics are pretty on point for my interests, be he just | seem... Too full of himself? I don't want to be mean in any | way, but if someone agrees maybe they can put a finger on what | it is | owenpalmer wrote: | Too full of himself? I'm not sure I understand, can you give | an example? | Cthulhu_ wrote: | I didn't get the impression he's too full of himself, but he | was confident for sure. That's not being full of oneself | though, that's making a video interesting, confidence, and | not filling the space with caveats or self-deprecation. | legohead wrote: | I feel like your mind must have confused two people. Steve is | very down to Earth. | | Maybe his youtube-battle with ElectroBOOM turned you off? | Where he was pretty convinced he was right about the chain | fountain. | masklinn wrote: | Nah I always have the same impression, even though I've | been watching for years (long before the chain thing), and | I can see the janky setups trying to figure things out. | | I think it's mostly the voice / accent, to me it... | _sounds_ sneery? | masklinn wrote: | His voice and presentation style do give me the same feeling. | I don't know why. Same with Mark Rober. | | But the actual content is the opposite. It's really quite | strange. | martinmunk wrote: | Yeah, I think I can see the link to Mark Rober. Although | not at all to the same degree. Maybe it's the way of | "acting dumb" in order to progress the discovery process, | but a face that they know full well (obviously) that he | knows what's going on? Essentially talking down to the | audience? | | Not sure. My first attempt at phrasing it did not get my | feeling across well. | Bellend wrote: | I don't know him but I feel he is a bit tongue-in-cheek with | humour. As far as I remember, he did comedy and was also good | with education with kids. I don't imagine meeting him and him | coming across as full of himself though. I feel I could | approach him in a pub and he would have good banter. | cycomanic wrote: | What is your background? I know that many Americans perceive | a British accent as snobbish/arrogant (this is often used in | Hollywood movies as well). So maybe it's just that? | phailhaus wrote: | This one is pretty representative of what his videos are | like. Could be that you got a skewed first impression? Once | you watch a few of them, you can see he's pretty genuine. | Retr0id wrote: | There are a few youtubers that come to mind who fit this | description, but Steve Mould is not one of them. | londons_explore wrote: | This circuit is awfully complex.... it's possible to do the same | with a far simpler circuit if you use the same coil for sensing | and accelerating the ball. | | A small microcontroller could do both - perhaps even with low | enough power that the whole circuit could stay turned on for | years on a charge (when not flinging the ball). | | Looking at the total energy you need to impart on the ball, you | should be able to do that with a far smaller coil and many fewer | capacitors as long as you have a suitably shaped steel core to | keep the flux path low. I suspect you might be able to do it with | no capacitors at all, since modern lithium cells are perfectly | happy to deliver 100 amps for a few milliseconds. | ape4 wrote: | An entire microcontroller to run an approx 3-line program? | polishdude20 wrote: | Cheaper than to have a microcontroller that results in a | smaller PCB vs discrete components that make the PCB bigger. | NavinF wrote: | That's very common. Look at all the $0.03 microcontrollers on | LCSC. They save time, money, and board space. | londons_explore wrote: | Using a single coil, the microcontroller program is pretty | complicated. It needs to pulse the coil very briefly on a | regular basis and measure the resonant frequency. | | If you do the capacitor-less design, you might want to have a | steel core with sawtooth top, and then use software to | measure the position of the ball relative to each tooth and | turn the coil on while the ball is heading towards a tooth | and off when the ball is heading away. That allows the energy | to be extracted from the battery slower. | | You might also choose to have your coil driven by an | h-bridge. That means you can put the energy from the magnetic | field that builds up in the steel core back into the battery | between each 'tooth'. That should dramatically increase | energy efficiency, allowing you to use a smaller (cheaper, | lighter, more eco friendly) cell or have the battery last | longer. To do that, you'll need current sensing too. | amelius wrote: | You say that the circuit is complex, but it's the other way | around. | | Its simplicity is the cause of the high component count. | pxndx wrote: | Lost it at the "through the magic of buying two of them" bit! | dageshi wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZs-YcmxyUw | [deleted] | debesyla wrote: | That, by the way, is a reference to another great channel - | Technology Connections: | https://youtube.com/@TechnologyConnections | divbzero wrote: | I wonder if the creator of this device William Le [1] has managed | to make this his full-time endeavor. | | [1]: https://www.etsy.com/shop/backtonaturedecor | koromak wrote: | Damn I kinda want to build little doohickeys and sell them on | etsy instead of going to work every morning | luma wrote: | Nothing stopping you! I have git and printables etc accounts | full of stuff I've designed and shared, but some folks might | just want the finished thing so awhile back I hung out my hat | and started a small shop selling the widgets I design and share | for free. | | Turns out a lot of people just want the thing, I can give the | plans away and still make some extra on the side by making a | few to sell. | | I'm incredibly far away from being able to quit my job over | this, but it has turned a few of my hobbies into slightly net- | profitable ventures instead of money holes and the result is a | well appointed shop to spend my free time playing around with | new ideas. | | My advice: give it a shot. There's nearly zero up front cost | and if nothing else, you'll probably learn a bit. | Workaccount2 wrote: | I can tell you that this has two possible outcomes: | | 1. You don't sell enough to get by. | | 2. You sell enough for Chinese knock-offs to come in and offer | a good-enough clone product for 1/3 your raw material cost. | | Being a first world tiny shop in hardware is near impossible. | masklinn wrote: | (3) you make good looking gizmos which are not really worth | copying seems to be the niche of "William". Apparently the | slides were about 150, and they're externally simple but good | looking. They're out of stock but the shop has neat kinetic | sculpture for high hundreds. | | Could you get plastic versions for a third the price? | Absolutely. _Would_ you? Hell nah. I could see kits of spare | parts to print and build your own, maybe, but not ready made. | itigtohft wrote: | If you search for "perpetual motion machine" you can find a | ton of cheap knockoffs of this device. You can get a badly | made wooden knockoff for $50 or quite a bit less? | newaccount74 wrote: | There are a bunch of tiny hardware shops in the audio | community that seem to be doing fine, for example | https://neurochrome.com/ | | Of course, running a small business like this is not easy, | but it's not impossible either. | [deleted] | tnecniv wrote: | Well then building doohickeys would be your new "going to work" | semireg wrote: | Business is a great way to ruin a hobby. | yantrams wrote: | Brings back childhood memories. Enjoyed reading about these and | the accompanying illustrations as a kid from the excellent book | Physics for Entertainment by Yakov Perelman. Nirantara Chalana | Yantralu they were called in Telugu translation. | facu17y wrote: | I had the Arabic translated edition of that book! same fond | memories! | tantony wrote: | > Physics for Entertainment by Yakov Perelman | | I read the same in Malayalam! That book was one of my earliest | introductions to practical physics. He deconstructs pretty much | all the early "perpetual machine" designs in the book. | | I also particularly remember the chapter with the experiments | with soap bubbles as being very interesting as a kid. | rendall wrote: | How delightful. I was 99% sure even before I clicked that it | would be Steve Mould. | | Loved his parody of the fixed grin of Technology Connections. | thefourthchime wrote: | Me too! | Try1275 wrote: | The video is worth just for his expression at 1:07. Highly | recommended. Have no interest in the topic and watched the whole | thing! | [deleted] | iamjackg wrote: | For those who don't know, it's a reference to Technology | Connections[0], another incredible YouTube channel. Alec, the | host, is very fond of that bit[1]. | | [0] https://youtube.com/@TechnologyConnections [1] | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZs-YcmxyUw | ChrisClark wrote: | Hah yeah, for some reason that line never gets old for me. | masklinn wrote: | It's short, it's snappy, and it's only deployed | appropriately (by Alec, and by Steve here), so it stays | fresh and not overdone. | | And other similarly nice recurring gag is Tasting History's | hardtack. | russdill wrote: | Oh my gosh, the green screen | em-bee wrote: | i have only seen a few of alec's videos, but i immediately | recognized this as familiar, wondering "hey, that's a | different guy" | maerF0x0 wrote: | Could this work as a magnetic rail with earth magnets? Would that | not require any batteries then? | p1mrx wrote: | What do you propose to use as an energy source? | [deleted] | ugh123 wrote: | How would you "switch off" the magnets as the train approaches | so as to allow it to pass with its newly gotten energy? | gus_massa wrote: | I'm not sure if the GP is proposing a railgun. In any case, I | propose a railgun version. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Railgun | stavros wrote: | Ooh, I'd love to find one of these on Ali, but their search is | betraying me currently. | comicjk wrote: | Was anyone else hoping it would detect the ball by simply | completing a circuit (since the rails are metal and so is the | ball)? Then it could give a magnetic tug after an appropriate | time. Maybe this would be flaky because of the poor contact | between rails and a rolling ball, but an inductive proximity | sensor feels like overkill. | angry_moose wrote: | It probably wouldn't work nearly as well. | | It looks like the rails are already a complete circuit - I | think they're a single piece of wire that is bent at the end to | make a loop, and there are a couple lateral braces soldered on | to keep them properly spaced. | | You'd have to split the rails into two pieces and replace the | lateral braces with something nonconductive (plastic) which | wouldn't look nearly as nice; and the device would be a lot | more prone to going out of calibration if the spacing drifted. | | Its probably possible but there's a lot of downsides to save $2 | on a sensor, some of which will be eaten up elsewhere as it | will add some additional parts. | | Edit: It would also somewhat spoil the magic, as that's the | first thing most of us would think of (I certainly did). | johnyzee wrote: | This got me wondering if it could be made to be entirely | mechanical. Like, the approaching ball triggers something to move | in front of the magnet 'switching it off', then slides away again | when the ball has passed, ready for the next run. | | I think I just invented perpetual motion... | tempestn wrote: | No reason you couldn't do that as long as you just mean the | actuation is purely mechanical. You'd still need an | electromagnet and power source though, as it only works if you | can turn the magnet on and off. | MetallicDragon wrote: | Any mechanism that could switch the magnet on and off would | require energy. E.g. you could put a magnet next to it with | opposite poles, which would mostly cancel out the magnetic | field, but would require a lot of force to push them together, | which is work, and thus requires energy. | p1mrx wrote: | What do you propose to use as an energy source? | austinjp wrote: | Just build a second machine to power the first! | _a_a_a_ wrote: | Excellent presentation, no dumb graphics, witticism, silly voices | or stupid faces pulled etc, just nice clean explanation. | | Nice toy too. I'd get one but I'd turn it on 3 times then get | bored and give it away. | zht wrote: | it's funny because there's another comment saying they really | enjoy the stupid face at 1:07 | Cthulhu_ wrote: | I like it as a desk toy, like the row of balls or things like | that. | phelm wrote: | I thought it was going to be a railgun | Cthulhu_ wrote: | It can be if the magnet's strong enough! | oldandtired wrote: | Steve makes an interesting statement when he says "we know that | perpetual motion is not possible". Yet we have a modification to | the general cosmological view with the theoretical entity "dark | energy" which if you consider what is said about it properties, | it provides a means of creating a "perpetual motion" environment. | | So what can we say: Does perpetual motion exist or not? | mr_mitm wrote: | Energy is not globally conserved in an expanding universe, dark | energy existing or not. | | https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2010/02/22/energy-... | | https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/259759/conservat... | | https://twitter.com/WKCosmo/status/1303134701180325890?t=pv5... | | Obviously the guy in the video was making the implicit | assumption that we are talking about local experiments. | n2d4 wrote: | The accepted solution in the second link claims your other | two links are wrong: | | > Some people claim incorrectly that energy is not conserved | in an expanding universe because space-time is not static. | The law of Energy conservation is derived from Noether's | theorem when the dynamical equations are unchanged with time. | These people confuse the invariance of the equations with the | invariance of the solution. Space-time changes but the | equations obeyed by the expanding universe do not change. | Space-time cannot be treated as a background, its dynamics | must be included when deriving the enrgy equations via | Noether's theorem. This leads to the equations given above | which show that energy is indeed conserved. | dist-epoch wrote: | You are being pedantic. | | If you want to consider dark energy perpetual motion, sure, but | then it's excluded from the "we know that perpetual motion is | not possible" rule. | | "we know that perpetual motion is not possible" is based on the | fact that you can't break the laws of physics, which perpetual | motion is doing, but if dark energy is part of physics, it | can't break those laws by definition. | Cthulhu_ wrote: | What makes you think dark energy is "a means of creating a | perpetual motion envrionment" though? I've never heard that | claim made. | | I mean personally I think the theory of dark matter / energy is | a patch for the perceptions not matching up with the theories, | but that's besides the point. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-09-14 23:00 UTC)