[HN Gopher] Burning money on paid ads for a dev tool - what we'v... ___________________________________________________________________ Burning money on paid ads for a dev tool - what we've learned Author : fmerian Score : 492 points Date : 2023-09-29 08:30 UTC (14 hours ago) (HTM) web link (posthog.com) (TXT) w3m dump (posthog.com) | [deleted] | vax425 wrote: | Thanks for sharing, mainly because I've felt like an idiot for | utterly failing at marketing my tool (https://HeadlampTest.com) | online to developers & testers. I get great results talking 1:1 | in person, but nothing else moves the needle. | | You've articulated the struggle better than anyone, and that's | very comforting for me. I mean, how hard could it be? Answer: | super hard! | | I haven't tried hiring an offshore agency, but now you've got me | thinking about it. | throwawysn38 wrote: | > Seriously, I don't know why more people don't use Quora.* | | It's a horrible website full of horrible answers. the UI is | terrible and you often end up reading stuff that has nothing to | do with the original question you were looking for. I think it's | understandable that advertisers would avoid it based in their | personal experience. | | Quora was supposed to be the TED of QA. Well, not even TED is the | TED of TED anymore so... | hermitcrab wrote: | It seems to be increasingly full of pro-Putin trolls. and | ridiculous 'questions' such "Why is <country> such a | shithole?". | dale_glass wrote: | > This is why we ask all users where they heard about PostHog | whenever they sign up or book a demo - it's a simple (optional) | free text field. Enough of our users say 'ad on Google' or | similar that we know paid ads do actually reach a large chunk of | them. | | You have to be careful with how you word questions. | | If you ask how I first noticed that something exists, then yes, | an ad may well be it because ads are so in your face and hard to | avoid. But it almost never is what _convinces_ me to try the | thing. In some cases ads actually dissuade me from trying the | thing. | | For instance, I'm extremely allergic to the word "proprietary". | If that's your selling point, then you automatically fall way | down in my list. I like my software boring and useful for my | ends, not to be locked into somebody else's system. | | Pretty much always what does it for me in the end is positive | discussion in technical spaces. | SOLAR_FIELDS wrote: | Yeah, I agree about positive discussion in technical space. | Even if it's just the founder coming on a Reddit thread and | shilling their own stuff while still providing value by | comparing it to other products. | | Example: I was interested in looking more into Dremio the other | day but couldn't really find any good positive technical | discussion about it on HN or Reddit so I just... stopped | looking into Dremio | doggerel wrote: | Totally agree. Value is the most important thing if you are | going to talk about yourself. It's not even like it's that | hard to just try to be excellent to people and to users and | share something worthwhile. But time and again, this is where | people fall down. | | Weirdly, google ads and GA4 are great examples of not | providing value and not treating people or users well. And | yet they cling on. | [deleted] | Lutger wrote: | I believe ads work by making a brand name familiar, which helps | you recognize it in the sea of information. And that makes it | automatically somewhat more attractive and reputably. You can | be entirely unaware of this and it still works. | | Maybe the ad is not what convinced you, not at all, but it did | prompt you to wonder if this LaunchDarkly thing is any good. | Youtube kept spamming it in your face and you kept ignoring it, | but of course the name stuck and now there are talking about it | on HN so you decide to read "that" thread and not the other one | about unleash or something you never heard of. | navane wrote: | Indeed, you remember the brand, but forget how you got to | know it. So even though you learned about something through | ads, and you hate ads, eventually you'll forget that it was | ads that put it in your brain, but you'll still remember the | brand. | | That's why I call ads psychological violence. They force | themselves in your brain and there's nothing you can do | against it | __MatrixMan__ wrote: | We need a worst offenders list so that every day we can | look at the list and make a point to share something true | and embarrassing about a company on it | | That way it won't be: | | > nothing you can do | | Then we'll have pretty retribution, which is the first step | towards tit-for-tat style cooperation. | dale_glass wrote: | Yes, but it can work in the opposite direction as well. | | Eg, all the Youtube ads of NordVPN only did was to convince | me that if I'm ever in the market, I'll use someone else. | Part because all that advertising has to cost a lot of money, | which of course the subscription has to pay for. Part because | some of their advertising is less than completely honest | about what they provide. | rchowe wrote: | I believe the economics of VPN companies is that they have | a quite inexpensive, commodity product which has a lot of | churn. The ads get people to sign up for a month or two at | any price, which pays for the cost of the ads. | | Tom Scott's video a few years ago helped, but some creators | still seem to be saying or implying that using a VPN makes | your browsing "safer," which unless you have a very | specific need for a certain kind of safety, is untrue. I | wish VPN companies would audit the claims their partners | are making about them, but there really isn't an incentive | to do so --- if their brand gets damaged irreparably they | can release a new VPN under a different brand. | InvaderFizz wrote: | In the vast majority of cases, these creators are only | taking slight liberties with talking points provided by | the advertiser. | | If basically every NordVPN ad on YouTube is talking about | safety, you can be fairly confident that it was a talking | point provided by NordVPN. | throw9away6 wrote: | Nordvpn seemed like a decent choice for streaming bbc but | I won't use them because of a company advertises that | hard it must be bad. I would never trust them for privacy | they are too big | adra wrote: | Apparently VPNs are stupidly high margins so the more | lemmings to convert, the more pockets lined. | throw9away6 wrote: | There did not seem to be a lot of lower cost options for | watching bbc they all cost about the same dispite high | margins | nextaccountic wrote: | thr notdvpn ads may have enlarged the consumer market for | vpns as well, which may benefit other vpns like mullvad | (people that never heard about vpns are convinced by the ad | that vpns are needed, searches more on google or reddit and | end up selecting what is considered the "most private" one, | that is, not nordvpn) | zarzavat wrote: | Sure but for every person like you there's several people | who are not knowledgable about VPNs and use NordVPN because | it's the one thing they heard about the most. | Lord-Jobo wrote: | And an absolute truckload of people deep in the para- | social relationship who couldn't imagine their 'friend' | steering them wrong on a product, intentionally or | otherwise | zarzavat wrote: | Tom Scott is a good example of the influence of VPN | money. He made an entire video about how and why he would | not make ads for VPNs because VPN ads are deceptive, this | video got millions of views ...and then later he started | making ads for VPNs (NordVPN iirc). I always wonder how | much they bought him for. | hennell wrote: | Pretty sure he made a video about him doing those ads | when he did them to answer that question, but you kind of | answer it in your description anyway. His objection to | VPN ads wasn't the fact it was a VPN, but the deceptive | content in the ads. Promises they don't deliver, benefits | you get from basic SSL anyway etc. | | When a VPN was happy to work with him on an ad that | wasn't deceptive or misleading he was happy to run it. I | think the original video only existed in the first place | because at that time he was willing to advertise a VPN | for the money offered, but they couldn't agree on ad | content he felt was fair. So his price never changed, the | VPN company just gave into his 'advertise honestly' | demand. | swyx wrote: | also check if it's just alphabetically sorted - "a" comes | before the other options, and people being lazy just pick that | YetAnotherNick wrote: | Could you list down some non popular digital service you pay | for(i.e. not google workspace, AWS etc.) and how you heard | about it? | dale_glass wrote: | Sure. | | High Fidelity, sort of. Failed commercial project to develop | a sort of VR world from the same guy that made Second Life. | Their advertising honestly cheesed me off and seemed to reek | of desperation. Their adoption of cryptocurrency didn't help | either. What did was that despite that they had promising | technology people I knew talked about, so I did check it out | despite all my initial misgivings, and it was good enough for | me to stick around there for a good while. When they gave up, | I was part of the group of people that tried to keep things | going, which eventually became a non-profit I'm now a member | of, https://overte.org/ | | Resonite. The new version of NeosVR, still in development. | Happened after an ideological split. I heard of NeosVR mostly | from Reddit discussion and friends who love the system. | | Linux Weekly News. Only news site I pay for, they post | interesting highly technical information. Pretty sure I heard | them mentioned in Linux discussion spaces. | | Linode -- Same deal, Linux users that use their services. Now | it's much bigger, I signed up back in the early days, back | when they used User-mode Linux, and had no SSDs. | cj wrote: | In other words, "Word of mouth" for all services. | | This is one of the most difficult marketing channels for | marketers to promote. It basically requires astroturfing | (e.g. planting biased questions on social platforms and | encourage organic engagement). | | I hate to admit this but this is how I got the first 10-20 | paid users for my B2B SaaS. Our product is a dev tool that | integrates with a bunch of other tools, so we found | questions from people on forums asking how to accomplish | [what our product does] and we'd answer the question with a | post recommending our service. | | And then we wrote a bunch of tutorials / guides for how to | integrate [popular service] <> [our product] to achieve | [what our product does] so that if anyone googles "[popular | service] [what our product does]" our help docs are usually | top of the page. | | Posting on forums was fine to get the first few users, but | it was long-tail SEO (which is pretty easy to rank since | it's long-tail) that got us the next 200. If the search | terms are specific enough and the category is relatively | undiscovered/unexploited, it's easy to rank. Unfortunately | it's really hard to find unexploited niches. | dale_glass wrote: | > In other words, "Word of mouth" for all services. | | Yup. I avoid every single ad I can on principle. Only | exception I used to make was for youtube sponsors, mostly | out of laziness, until I finally installed sponsorblock. | | I've gotten so good at it that at this time I haven't the | faintest idea of what movies are there to see at the | cinema. Not a single one. | | I'm probably a very extreme case in actually having | succeeded in disconnecting myself from popular culture to | a very large extent. | hennell wrote: | There is a real problem with discovery without any ads. | I'm still aware of movies, but I never have much idea | what TV shows exist anymore, or even when shows I like | might are back on the air/streaming. | | I might hear about about something interesting on social | media or a podcast, but won't remember it until I see a | picture on the streaming platform months later, when it's | already been canceled for lack of viewers. | | Youtube is actually the only place I actively block all | ads, because they seem unable to stop spamming me with | android games that are nothing like the ads at all and | are unbelievably annoying. Most websites and stuff I'll | let them show ads by default, then block the site if they | have more ads than content etc. Although I also just try | to avoid those sites in the first place. | ryandrake wrote: | In general, I don't want to "discover" products, not at | all times of the day, on every web site I visit, every | radio and TV station I tune into, every billboard I pass. | | Marketers have this notion that people are all merely | 24/7 product-consumers, constantly on the lookout to | discover new products to consume, and as long as their | "message" reaches my brain, it's an unambiguously good | thing for both parties. | | When I'm browsing the web, or driving to work, or | watching a show, or trying to complete some basic task | around my life, I'm _definitely not_ trying to discover | your product. I wish marketers would stop assuming I am. | If I want to look for an unknown product, I 'll | deliberately go out and do so. In that case, and only in | that case, ads are welcome. | burnished wrote: | Not knowing about whats new on TV is a feature! Given the | wealth of tv and movie content available, should you be | treating a canceled show that wasn't intriguing enough to | look into at the time as a loss? | Metacelsus wrote: | >For instance, I'm extremely allergic to the word | "proprietary". | | You may enjoy this: https://denovo.substack.com/p/help-doctor- | ive-been-exposed-t... | AussieWog93 wrote: | >If you ask how I first noticed that something exists, then | yes, an ad may well be it because ads are so in your face and | hard to avoid. But it almost never is what convinces me to try | the thing. In some cases ads actually dissuade me from trying | the thing. | | In my primary business (used video games) I've found that the | #1 way to get sales is: | | - Give the consumer every feature they need (ideally | communicate this in a picture) | | - Be the first search result | | It's not about detailed descriptions, super-competitive prices | or superior product quality. | | People will literally just throw money at the first product | they see that ticks all the boxes. | | In the SaaS world, where everything has a free trial, I can | imagine this "rule" is even more true. | sfink wrote: | Aren't you mostly talking about what the article calls | awareness vs conversion? You're saying that ads made you aware | and technical discussion is what would make you convert. | | The other thing is controversial. "There's no such thing as bad | PR" is a saying for a reason. I am also convinced that there | are some things that make me never, ever consider a product. | And yet: there was this one brand I hated, but it's been a | while, and this one looks familiar... was it the good one or | the bad one? Never mind, I don't have time to try to dredge | that up, this looks familiar at least so I'll just grab it and | remember for next time. (Sure I will...) | | And that's just one way that bad PR can still be effective. | Another is that it gets people talking about you, and some | people will argue the other side because the main person's | arguments are just bad. | | Bad PR is good for awareness. Conversion is often based on | different criteria than you expect. You may hate X, but you | have a client who has heard of X and hasn't heard of Y, your | preferred option. | musicale wrote: | > Bad PR is good for awareness | | intuit/turbotax. Will never use them, ever. Looking forward | to the day that product is eliminated from existence by | regular online filing. | | https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press- | releases/2022/03/... | gascoigne wrote: | What do you use to do your taxes then? | Retr0id wrote: | Even _negative_ discussion can be a positive signal sometimes, | e.g. if it 's someone complaining about the rough edges that | they still use a product in spite of - because it still | ultimately solves their problems. | yunohn wrote: | > If you ask how I first noticed that something exists, then | yes, an ad | | Yes, that's the point of a "branding" ad campaign - to drive | upper funnel interest in a company/product. | | They can also use retargeting to show the same people | "performance" ad campaigns, which are meant to drive a lower | funnel conversion like a signup, purchase, or even a demo. | | Depending on the product, you can even use an organic | discussion about your product as marketing material to get | people to see the interest others have in it. Or market a | conference or dev day where they show off its capabilities. | | There's a lot of layers to marketing, it's not as simple as HN | makes it out to be. | kouru225 wrote: | Wouldn't that still be a beneficial thing? It's like how I | don't need a plumber but if I did need a plumber I'd go reach | for the last one I remember. | Octoth0rpe wrote: | > [re: bing ads]: Good only if you want to target users at large | enterprises where they are forced to use Bing. | | Is that a thing now? Companies restricting which search engine | you're allowed to use at work? I've worked in some pretty locked | down environments before where switching browsers wasn't an | option (thankfully less of a thing now), but hadn't ever heard of | a company restricting search engines. | mgbmtl wrote: | I often stumble on clients who use Edge without knowing it, and | then using Bing because they don't know how to change it, but I | can imagine some might not be able to change any browser | settings (although, imo, Google is pretty much as bad as Bing | lately). | [deleted] | mcbrienollie wrote: | Day after day, the paid(online) ads is becoming traditional and | all the startup owners or new entrepreneurs are diverting | themselves into guerilla techniques. Buying Tiktok comments, | ProductHunt reviews and more. Rather than spending the money on | the algorithmic advertisement, they are trying to build a base | where they can create a "base" for their possible customers. I | really liked the article, and I think this is showing a couple of | crucial signs about the topic I mentioned. | zegl wrote: | What are peoples thoughts on sponsoring open source projects as a | way to build awareness for dev tools? I think I've seen PostHogs | logo in sponsor sections in some READMEs. | kylegalbraith wrote: | We do a little bit of this with depot.dev and it doesn't have | meaningful conversion. | | But, I do think it helps awareness as we do get some folks that | tell us I saw you on this repo or that. | | We also do it to support projects we think are neat/useful to | others even if we don't use it. | james_impliu wrote: | we mainly do this because it can just help with getting PRs | approved if we want to fix an issue in something we rely on | (and it is nice / we can list as a perk), and a little | influence can be very valuable if we want to give feedback on a | project's direction. doesn't do much on the growth side as far | as i'm aware, for us at least. | bongobingo1 wrote: | I have never once clicked a "sponsors" logo, but I have | definitely seen a logo I know and probably thought better of | the company for it - baring GloboMegaCorps that I have long | since calcified my opinions about. | | Though, if you want to sponsor me GloboMegaCorp, my opinion can | definitely be bought. | LoganDark wrote: | Hah, this site was in the filter list for my firewall. | jdwyah wrote: | Also marketing to developers, I've had the most success and | enjoyed Reddit the most so far. It feels the most honest. Want to | tell a bunch of rails developers about your dynamic logging? You | can try to write a useful post that also mentions your product | onto r/rubyonrails/ but you're run the risk of being downvoted | into oblivion with "venordz spam suxxxx". | | But it's fair game to promote the same post on that subreddit, | because that's what promotion is supposed to do. | | That said, you can't just post crap ads or you'll get snarky | comments. As my co-founder said "You can't just shout nonsense | into the void without some accountability." I think the internet | could use more of that. | | (unpaid advert: we're also happily using posthog to track all of | this. kudos to them for a great product.) | Ylpertnodi wrote: | >That said, you can't just post crap ads or you'll get snarky | comments. | | Ah, maybe you meant "honest" comments. | datavirtue wrote: | That mascot/logo is adorable. I just want to feed it!! | asicsp wrote: | Related: https://posthog.com/blog/dev-marketing-for-startups | | Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=34998921 _(254 | points | 7 months ago | 72 comments)_ | somedude895 wrote: | > Awareness-based ads are a small part of creating demand. This | takes more effort to measure, but is totally possible - see | below. | | Below where? What a tease. | | Cpms? Amount of impressions? Reach? What about viewability? Brand | lift studies won't be possible at these budgets either. | | Do they mean just asking people where they heard about them? | mdopslevel wrote: | [flagged] | rideontime wrote: | Definitely limit your twitter replies if your company is named | something like "post hog." | https://twitter.com/search?src=typed_query&q=post%20hog (possibly | NSFW) | gmanis wrote: | Nice article and PostHog is one of my favourite startups to look | for especially on the culture side. Your careers page and | compensation calculator is a breath of fresh air. | [deleted] | dielll wrote: | I found it weird that they did not use Meta's products(Facebook | and Instagram) but used Twitter. | | To be honest Meta are so good at target advertising. Everytime I | open Facebook or Instagram, I must find an advert about something | I am interested in. | callalex wrote: | This company must have done something totally awful, the whole | domain is automatically blocked by my DNS filters... | | Ah, its entire point is to stalk unwitting users. I guess my | filter was correct! | benjaminwootton wrote: | Off topic but I love the Posthog brand, marketing and tone of | voice. A real exemplar of how to market a developer tool. | nico wrote: | It would be very useful for a lot of people who commented on this | previous post (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37622702) to | read this article | | Starting with the misconceptions: | | > Paid ads =/= marketing | [deleted] | aldousd666 wrote: | This page is down, I can't read the article. | ripdog wrote: | It's probably being blocked by your DNS-adblocker. | mavhc wrote: | I learned about them from yesterday's HN post about Open source | and profitability, and this post. 2 mentions in a row sticks in | my mind. | | Same with GoDot recently, once on Humble Bundle, then again on HN | d--b wrote: | Ok, so that page itself is an ad for PostHog. Sigh. | sakerbos wrote: | Relying on an ad to convert a user is a big ask. Another approach | could be to offer something high value to your target market in | exchange for their email which you could then use to slowly raise | awareness and convert users over a series of emails that offer | even more value to them. That way you're greatly increasing the | surface area of interactions with potential users while still | genuinely helping them. | zubairq wrote: | I would recommend content marketing myself, addressing a pain | point that the problem solves in a blog post. | simonsarris wrote: | Have spent six figures yearly on ads, mostly for reach for the | developer-focused diagram library GoJS (https://gojs.net) | | > Each experiment will need ~$500 and 2 weeks | | I would add a zero if you want serious data. I would also double | the timescale. $5,000 over 4 weeks | | I second the uselessness of Google Display, it might look like | conversions numbers are good but they are 100% too good to be | true. As soon as you look into them you find the sources are | things like "ad from HappyFunBabyTime Android app". You have to | ruthlessly prune daily for months to get anything real, and even | then I'm skeptical of value. For a developer tool with very | strict conversion metrics! | | But I disagree on Google Search: | | > Good for conversion, bad for awareness. | | Before we were popular it was _excellent_ for awareness. Post | popularity its much more arguable. | hermitcrab wrote: | I looked through someone's Google Ads account once to find that | he has spent several thousand dollars on clicks from mobile | games for under 5s. This was B2B software. Never accept Google | Ad defaults! | warpspin wrote: | And I want to add: Never trust Google's salespeople on | expansions of your campaigns. They will helpfully offer to | setup supposedly well targeted reach campaigns for you ;-) | chiefalchemist wrote: | > I'm a big fan of hiring an agency if you're a startup - paying | $5-10k/mo for a small, outsourced team is way more efficient at | this stage than hiring one paid ads specialist. | | Agency vs hiring? Yes, it makes sense. But there are A LOT of | wonky agencies out there. Don't rely on their promises or even | part performance. And be weary of those fond of vanity metrics | and such. | | Sure, go the agency route, but also do keep them on a shorter | leach until they've proven themselves. | kyle-rb wrote: | > Twitter | | > Turn off replies to ads (or have thick skin!) | | Probably good advice in general, but most brand names don't need | to worry about unwanted attention as much as "Post Hog". | sjm wrote: | lol exactly, especially on Twitter. Who's in charge of branding | here? dril? | dangus wrote: | What about Instagram, Facebook, and TikTok? | | I'm surprised they haven't been considered. | anonzzzies wrote: | This seems like a very techy product; would the audience be | there? It's a question as I don't know, but if I see my own | usage as a techy, it's not; I don't know anyone who even | likes/uses these platform in my cto/decision making circles. | But I would really like to know as if there is significant | conversion opportunity there (and not just tossing away money) | for a very tech product (with code examples on the homepage | like this one) then it would be interesting. | dangus wrote: | I think it's a mistake to underestimate the amount of tech | people on social media. A lot of people who have privacy | awareness and say that Meta and ByteDance are evil | surveillance capitalism companies still use their services. I | might even go as far as arguing that it's hard not to without | feeling left out of the cultural zeitgeist. | | My social feeds are filled with ads for enterprise software | products. | | If a product can be shown in a lighting fast video demo, I | think Reels and TikTok have great potential. | anonzzzies wrote: | > My social feeds are filled with ads for enterprise | software products. | | But what's the conversion; as the article (and many more | anecdotes and articles and real life P&L's) shows, is that | very many companies are just randomly burning money on ads | without conversion. So that you see the ads doesn't mean | they convert at all. Did you ever buy anything via them? Or | even sign up or click one? | | I'm not saying you are wrong or so, but it would be good to | hear from a similar product to what this posthog company | has who has experience and knows conversions. | | I think enterprises often just buy enormous inventory of | ads and don't really are on top of how they convert; when | i'm doing competitor analysis (and I shall include | tiktok/insta now), I click on many competitor ads to see | what their landing is and their flow; at least 5% of ads I | click go to a 404/500/dns error page. So these enterprises | are paying for that click (and many more) but _cannot_ | convert because it 's not actually working. So those are | simply monitoring nothing and throwing money in the river | for 0 conversions. Probably hired some company to handle | the campaigns and seeing it as 'cost of doing business' not | expecting much in return in the first place? | cm2012 wrote: | I've targeted developers on FB/IG at high budgets | successfully with good ROI attributed to it. | anonzzzies wrote: | Could you provide some more info? Like for what for | instance? Desktop apps, mobile apps, saas, job openings, | certification, courses, ...? | qingcharles wrote: | I don't use IG enough to fully understand their ads, but I | think the ads are well integrated on Facebook and TikTok, and | also well-targeted. I regularly click on ads and buy products | from TikTok. There are tons of offers I get to test out | advertising at a huge discount on both platforms which would be | worth someone taking advantage of to see if it fits your niche. | On Facebook you only need some text and an image, but on TikTok | you would have to go to the trouble of creating a video, but | you could pay someone from Fiverr if you didn't care too much | about the quality (which isn't a huge issue on TikTok as lower | quality can often come across as more authentic). | cm2012 wrote: | I've spent about $100m on B2B ads in the last 12 years, including | to developers. Overall the article is not bad but it's missing | some things: | | 1) "LinkedIn Good for awareness, bad for conversion." LI can | smash it on conversion. Its expensive so you need a high customer | lifetime value. Make a compelling offer and try conversation ads. | | 2) Facebook/IG also does work for targeting developers, better | than anything else but LI and Search. It's funny because there's | such loud anti-facebook developers out there, but plenty use it | anyway. | nico wrote: | What's your secret for LinkedIn? | | Everyone I know who's ever tried Ads there has gotten little or | no conversions at all, while spending a ton of money (LI | advertising is expensive!) | cm2012 wrote: | Have a great offer (get a demo is not enough), try | conversation and newsfeed ads, work with a contractor who | knows it. Expect to spend 10 to 20k testing though. Not for | low budgets. | kylegalbraith wrote: | PostHog is a fantastic product and I really feel like they are | becoming the company that is looking to broadly share their | learnings/experience with others. | n_ary wrote: | > we ask all users where they heard about PostHog whenever they | sign up or book a demo - it's a simple (optional) free text | field. Enough of our users say 'ad on Google' or similar that we | know paid ads do actually reach a large chunk of them. | | Caveat: I always type in "search engine" or "google" despite the | fact that I only use Brave/Bing/DDG. I often find things on | random interesting post where the author remarks some benefits | that I think applies to me and go checkout those products. | | When I see such boxes "where did you hear about our product" I | just type in "google" or "search engine" because I don't exactly | have the time to go back through 100 tabs I have open and find | the exact one article where I found the product and copy-pasta | the url. | | Nearly all of my colleagues also do this, because it is easier to | type "google", so advice is to take these boxes with a grain of | salt. A better metrics could be the referrer field on your site | logs. | carlosjobim wrote: | "I don't remember" needs to be an option for this question. | 22289d wrote: | You don't have to give the url, you can just say 'found it | online' 'saw it an article'. anything like that will be much | more helpful than giving them false information. | | Reddit is where I often see this stuff and for those dropdowns | i typically select something like 'word of mouth' which is true | enough for their purposes. | frereubu wrote: | I think the point is that most people have extremely-low-to- | zero motivation to spend time actually thinking about that | question, so they pick whatever makes the request go away. I | know I'm like that, exemplified by the fact that if the | question is mandatory, and I pick something which triggers an | extra text field for more information, I am much more like to | try and change the intial option to something that doesn't | require the extra input rather than having to think about | what to write. | 22289d wrote: | one day i will figure out how to respond to a minor detail, | without making people think i'm addressing the main point. | fluoridation wrote: | Have you tried prepending "just a minor note to add to | what you said:"? | bee_rider wrote: | I wonder if this is a problem with the branching | structure of these sorts of discussion boards? Every | comment is in some sense the start of a new | conversation... it sometimes feels like there's a | tendency to want to grow a thread to meet that "whole | conversation" measure. Maybe the issue is that little | details don't make it, so context gets pulled from the | main thread? | | It would be interesting is the site had the ability to | make linear threads coming out of a comment, or start | whole new branches. Then each branch could have an | assorted "random asides" spot or something. | digitcatphd wrote: | IMHO anything B2B it's best to start with email and cold | outreach. This tends to get feedback quickly and is very cheap. | swores wrote: | Disclaimer: I run a small European marketing agency (though our | minimum monthly budget for clients is a few times bigger than | discussed & recommended in the article). | | I think this is a really good article, and I definitely agree | both with the suggestion to use an agency (though I suppose I | could be biased here!) - there's a lot of low-hanging fruit and | it's definitely possible to do plenty yourself, but unless you | really can't afford an agency there's surely more important | things to work on yourselves. While hiring dedicated marketing | people makes sense when you're a certain size or bigger I've | still seen the best arrangement to be as few people internally as | possible and being people who are not only good at marketing but | more importantly good at managing, and have the bulk of the work | handled by an agency. Rather than having to deal in giving whole | people specific jobs, an agency can provide small amounts of time | as needed from a wide range of experts on different aspects. | | I also agree that it's a good idea to be familiar with with it | all too, though, because that way you can actually judge which | agencies are worth working with and you can actually work with | them, rather than leave them alone and hope they're going to do a | good job. | | This article itself is a really great example of what they | explained at the beginning - about writing. It's not a paid ad, | but it got me interested in potentially using their analytics | product from having previously not heard of them. | niknikson wrote: | Really appreciate this article and wanted to add a few of my | thoughts. I've been an inhouse marketer in the Dev Tool space for | 2 different SDK companies over the last 5 years. The majority of | my focus has been on paid / organic search channels (primarily | google) because these two channels had the largest impact in the | number of leads we generate. | | The first thing I wanted to touch on is the idea that developers | hate marketing - this is 100% accurate and I would recommend | anyone doing marketing in the dev tool space to have this | mindset. | | For me the way I've dealt with this concept is to try to reframe | what my objective is as a marketer. Fundamentally the SDK's I've | worked for do deliver value to a developer by helping them | develop tools faster and in a more polished fashion. For some | developers this is super useful and for others it will never be | an option. For obvious reasons I focus on the developers that | would see value in this and do everything in my power to make | them aware that our solution exists. | | My approach to developer marketing: | | - Try to be direct as possible in how I communicate the features | / capabilities / benefits while avoiding marketese / jargon etc | | - I have a philosophy that if you provide value without any | strings you benefit in the long run. That's why I've always | opposed gated content or even gating trials if possible. | | - Developer experience is fundamental to the success of dev tools | business. In my organization marketing takes an active role in | dev experience - for example we helped reorganize documentation | to make it more accessible and easier to navigate for our users. | This had a dramatic impact in product adoption. | | - Having a good demo should be the cornerstone of your marketing | activities. It's how developers see what you can do and gives | your sales team the tools to sell your product effectively. | | - Make use of things like live demos so developers can | anonymously learn and observe your team without directly talking | to a sales representative. | | Some of the things I disagree with in the article. | | Google display never works: | | - This is not always the case. For obvious reasons retargeting is | especially disliked in the developer world but in some cases it | works. For me I'll run a Google display campaign that targets any | user that's downloaded our SDK. For these users I focus on | delivery display ads that help them integrate the product more | effectively. For example I will create ads for these users that | promote free trial support to help them build their POC. | Typically marketing is not incentivized to drive an increase in | support calls but if a user is having trouble building a POC then | this is the ideal candidate for us to send to support. | | - This also works for marketing pages - users who land on a | marketing page will see ads for ungated content like "Buy vs | Build" etc | | The missing link between paid and organic traffic | | Something that seems to be consistently overlooked is how the | effort and money you spend on paid channels should help you make | better decisions on increasing organic traffic. This is sometimes | the main downside with hiring an agency - they might be really | good on managing the paid side but don't provide input on how you | can use this to increase organic channels. For example: | | - Identify which paid keywords drive conversions and use this | data to prioritize your organic channels. | | - Use the number of search impressions for your keywords to | accurately measure demand for a service | | - Use A/B testing to improve CTR in organic search. For example | we had a really good blog article that did not have a great | title. I ran a display campaign with different titles for this | blog article. After about a month there was a clear winner and we | renamed the blog article resulting in the ranking and traffic | going up for the article. | | Paid search and SEO do increase brand awareness | | We primarily focused on paid search and SEO which resulted in a | significant increase in the total number of users that searched | for a brand year-over-year. The number of people searching for | your brand is one of the best ways for you to measure brand | awareness. | | With all this said I do believe that ultimately any success you | have marketing to developers manifests from your intentions. I've | always believed that my intention as a marketer was to "help | developers" by providing them tools to make their lives easier. I | think this intention is mirrored in the work I do and has been a | part of the reason we've been successful. | rjakobsson wrote: | PostHog is my favourite startup as of lately. Their company | culture seems to really be pushing things to the next level. Very | inspiring! | ransom1538 wrote: | Take a lawn sign. Paint it white and black. In it, just put your | domain and your uri. iamaretardbuyingads.com/test1 <- just put | this in your lawn sign. Test a lawn sign vs 2k a month google | budget. WELL, I have tried this. The lawn sign wins. | benjaminwootton wrote: | I've had my own startups and worked with tens of others. I don't | know anybody who has had good experience or ROI with paid ads. | | There is something "emperors new clothes" about the whole | industry where we all play the game but nobody admits they just | aren't very good. Yet we all keep paying the Google bills | thinking it's something you have to do. | jklinger410 wrote: | > I've had my own startups and worked with tens of others. I | don't know anybody who has had good experience or ROI with paid | ads. | | And how many of those startups had a great product market fit | and were successful, without a ton of incumbents in the | industry eating their lunch? | | How much budget did they have and how much of their runway did | it eat up to try and run ads? | | Many people blame ads for simply having a bad product that no | one cares about and never finding the right audience for that | product for them to even serve ads to in the first place. | whimsicalism wrote: | I see a comment like this on every discussion about ads for | businesses, despite the fact that incrementality is easy to | measure and quite good for a lot of businesses. | ilrwbwrkhv wrote: | I'll share a small secret. I don't know how replicable this is | but I'm curious. Ad sets work really well for a while and then | the numbers start getting faker and faker. So what I do is | duplicate sets and everyday pause one and start another. This | has given me better numbers although never 100% reliable | numbers. All ad platforms fake some data and charge you for it. | imadj wrote: | > we all play the game but nobody admits they just aren't very | good | | I don't think that's common. Do you mean like in big corp where | they use their deep pockets to make sure they don't leave room | for competition? | | In other cases, people just expirement in order to find the | right channel, similar to this post, which ultimately depends | on the objective and target audience. Then they focus their | efforts there. | hermitcrab wrote: | I started using Google Ads in the early days and could get | loads of well targetted clicks for PS0.05 to PS0.10 each. Those | days are over. The "law of shitty clickthrus" says that every | advertising channel gets less profitable over time. | danjc wrote: | The house of Google always wins. | anonzzzies wrote: | What is 'not really good'? We had spectacular ROI on adwords | ads. BUT, and the article mentions this somewhat, _not_ for | tech /freemium saas products. Developers avoid ads like the | plague. For consumer stuff that are just immediately paid | (there is no free; you pay or you leave the landing page) it | works incredibly well in our experience. | morning-coffee wrote: | > Developers avoid ads like the plague. | | Yep. As a developer, running a pihole, I don't see any ads | and I wouldn't click even if I did. | | I thought the tl;dr; of the article was going to be along the | lines of "if you're selling a "developer tool", don't bother | buying ads because "developers" (i.e. your customers) are | likely going to lengths to not see these ads in the first | place. | benjaminwootton wrote: | This is the one situation where it does work better. Many | years ago I was interested in affiliate marketing, where | there was a relatively immediate purchase. The aim then was | to optimise spend and conversion rate and a profit could be | eeked out. | | When there is a slower sales cycle and a more complex or less | transactional purchase then it all becomes much more vague | and significantly harder to find ROI in my experience. The | ad-click is likely to be one of a hundred factors compared to | transactionally selling a widget. | k__ wrote: | _" Developers avoid ads like the plague."_ | | If they can. | | They can't avoid them on Instagram or Tiktok. | intrasight wrote: | Why do you think that? | anonzzzies wrote: | No, I guess that's where my age or echo chamber shines | through; I don't know any developers using those platforms. | My colleagues don't; most are > 40, but the 20somethings we | work with also don't. That's just my experience, so it says | very little. Like I say somewhere else, I'm curious what | the conversion for tech products on those forced ad | platforms is. Actual numbers. | k__ wrote: | I don't use them for dev stuff either. | | But I was surprised when I syndicated my content there, | that so many devs where engaging there. | tomjen3 wrote: | I would assume most devs are smart enough to stay away from | those places. | ferrantim wrote: | Just wanted to say thanks for the article. Very well-written and | actionable. | troyvit wrote: | > We spend 80%+ on writing. | | Gotta admit, I read the article but I'm spending more time | looking at the product. The writing brought me in, and now I'm | aware of their product. | hannofcart wrote: | The article has some helpful points. But as a programmer-SAAS- | founder-who-took-over-ads operation, I have some tips on some | insights we gleaned doing paid ads (and getting it to be | profitable for us): | | 1. Most important tip: is your product ready for ads? | - Do not do paid ads too early. - Do it once you know | that your product is compelling to your target audience. | - Ads are likely an expensive way of putting your product in | front of an audience. - No matter how good the ad | operation, unless your product can convince a user to stay and | explore it further, you've just gifted money to Google/X/Meta | whoever. - If you haven't already, sometimes when you | think you want ads, what you more likely and more urgently need | is better SEO optimization | | 2. The quality of your ad is important, but your on-boarding | flows are way more important still. - Most of the | time, when we debugged why an ad wasn't showing conversions, | rather than anything inherent to the ad, we found that it was the | flows the user encountered _AFTER_ landing on the platform that | made the performance suffer. - In some cases, it's | quite trivial: eg. one of our ads were performing poorly because | the conversion criterion was a user login. And the login button | ended up _slightly_ below the first 'fold' or view that a user | saw. That tiny scroll we took for granted killed performance. | | 3. As a founder, learn the basics - This is not | rocket science, no matter how complex an agency/ad expert may | make it look. - There are some basic jargon that will | be thrown around ('Target CPA', 'CPC', 'CTR', 'Impression | share'); don't be intimidated - Take the time to dig | into the details - They are not complicated and are | worth your time especially as an early stage startup - | Don't assume that your 'Ad expert' or 'Ad agency' has 'got this'. | - At least early on, monitor the vital stats closely on weekly | reviews - Ad agencies especially struggle with | understanding nuances of your business. So make sure to help them | in early days. | | 4. Targeting Awareness/Consideration/Conversion - | Here I have to politely disagree with the article - | Focus on conversion keywords exclusively to begin with! | - These will give you low volume traffic, but the quality will | likely be much higher - Conversion keywords are also a | great way to lock down the basics of your ad operation before | blowing money on broad match 'awareness' keywords - | Most importantly, unless your competition is play dirty and | advertising on your branded keywords, don't do it. - | Do NOT advertise on your own branded keywords, at least to begin | with. - Most of the audience that used your brand | keywords to get to your site are essentially just repeat users | using your ad as the quickest navigation link. Yikes! | | 5. Plug the leaks, set tight spend limits - | You'll find that while your running ads, you are in a somewhat | adversarial dance with the ads platform - Some caveats | (also mentioned in the article) - Ad reps (mostly) | give poor advice, sometimes on borderline bad faith. We quickly | learnt to disregard most of what they say. (But be polite, | they're trying to make a living and they don't work for you.) | - (Also mentioned in the article) Do not accept any 'auto | optimization' options from the ads platform. They mostly don't | work. - Set tight limits on spends for EVERYTHING in | the beginning. I cannot emphasize this enough. Start small and | slowly and incrementally crank up numbers, whether it be spend | limits per ad group, target CPA values, CPC values - whatever. | Patience is a big virtue here - If you're running | display ads, there are many more leaks to be plugged: disallow | apps if you can (article mentions why), and disallow scammy sites | that place ads strategically to get stray clicks. - | For display ads, controlling 'placement' also helps a lot | | 6. Read up `r/PPC` on Reddit - Especially the | old, well rated posts here. - They're a gold mine of | war stories from other people who got burnt doing PPC, whose | mistakes you can avoid. | alice-i-cecile wrote: | This is super valuable. I see the same things helping game devs | with marketing: they're often too keen to put energy and money | into marketing when they haven't identified a niche or reached | acceptable levels of polish. | | If the consumer can't quickly tell what your product does and | why it's great, stop wasting your time and fix _those_ | problems! | tylergetsay wrote: | This is super insightful, thanks for outlining this! | iamben wrote: | The Twitter 'thick skin' part made me laugh. | | A past startup had the same experience with Reddit ads. The | initial replies were so negative ("I could do this 3x cheaper | myself" etc), and often negative for the sake of negativity. It | took a little time, but we replied to most of them with gentle | words along the lines of "thank you for your thoughts and | comments; we're a small business trying to do things ethically; | getting it from us saves you the time/cost of leaving the house | and we know how valuable your time is" - and it actually ended up | quite a decent ad. | | People just love to hate, especially when there's no human face | to something. Or, I think in the case of places/networks where | the community is tight and niche, if you're going to interject | your product you'd better have enough of an understanding to | answer as if you belong/have been a silent part of it all along. | | Complete aside - I'm glad I've never had to market to devs, haha. | collyw wrote: | Redditors are a cancer on society. Terrible people. | jollofricepeas wrote: | The first rule in enterprise sales is that the first human | reaction will always be "No." | | The former CEO of Routeware before he sold it to Vista Equity | Partners said that he required his sales team to secure three | clear "No's" for each buyer within an organization before fully | disqualifying a lead. | | So if you're selling to a "software architect" and the CTO has | to provide the final sign off. | | - three no's from the architect | | - three no's from the CTO | | It's funny how easily we give up on potentially successful | concepts by not getting to a "No" faster or even at all. | | It's completely foreign to software engineers. | ncallaway wrote: | Wow, that would piss me the fuck off. | TeMPOraL wrote: | I hope they're counting each individual instance of a "no", | so that if I say "no" three times during the same cold | call, they'll GTFO and never call again. | INGSOCIALITE wrote: | People are going to hate it just because it's an ad that they | don't want to see while scrolling their feeds. You could have | the greatest product on earth and simply because it's an | advertisement it will receive negative feedback, and snarky | replies. | | Advertising on social media platforms is horrendous - no one | wants to see an ad, ever, for any product or service. You're | already at a disadvantage by being the source of the end user's | ire, so winning them over is extra hard. | pbhjpbhj wrote: | >Advertising on social media platforms is horrendous - no one | wants to see an ad, ever, // | | Something like Instagram is all ads, isn't it. But people do | want to see the ads because they're mostly "content". I | devour ads for Creality 3D printers which look like "how to | make this neat gizmo". Similarly I love ads for outdoor gear | that are couched as "how to tie this knot" or "how to make a | Swedish candle fire without wire". And the "how to make this | pottery" which is really, 'my pots are awesome, buy some'. | | Just recently I've been into adverts for comedian's tours on | Facebook, which are little 2-5 minute excerpts from their | routine. | | So, yeah. I don't think I'm an outlier. | | I'm with the person suggesting "show them how to do it for | themselves" as a pretty good advert, but I've not looked at | the OP yet, maybe they'll give away the crown jewels. | 22289d wrote: | One could say you're doing the exact same thing to Redditors | that you say they do. Being negative for the sake of being | negative. Just love to hate when there is no human face - or | even someone to reply. But oops, here one is ;) | | Redditors are entitled and they are demanding and they are | quick to jump all over you. And they can be wrong. But it's not | for the sake of negativity and it's not because there is no | human there. | | That culture is damned effective at filtering out bullshit and | bad actors and getting to the facts. If you want to bring | Redditors some overpriced vaporware you are absolutely right | they're going to rip you apart. They're just doing what | Redditors do - calling out bullshit. | | Bring them a product worthy of praising and they'll make entire | subreddits dedicated to your awesome product. | llbeansandrice wrote: | > That culture is damned effective at filtering out bullshit | and bad actors and getting to the facts. | | No idea how anyone can say this earnestly about Reddit while | having spent as much time there as you claim you have. It's a | horrible corner of the internet rife with all kinds of | bigotry and hatred and negativity for the sake of it. Not to | mention it's the easiest place to astroturf ever. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suicide_of_Sunil_Tripathi | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2014_celebrity_nude_photo_leak | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversial_Reddit_communiti. | .. | 22289d wrote: | I think you just set the World Record for most strawmen in | one comment. Congratulations. | | If you took what I said to be some type of blanket 'Reddit | is a perfect and wonderful place' you misunderstood. | duxup wrote: | > That culture is damned effective at filtering out bullshit | and bad actors and getting to the facts. | | That's not my experience at all. I'm curious what makes you | think that? | 22289d wrote: | > I'm curious what makes you think that? | | 15+ years of living on Reddit. | | Is it perfect at those things? Of course not. Can you and I | and others provide a bunch of examples of those things not | happening? Of course. It's still damned good at them. | | I expanded at length here on how this works with regard to | people trying to promote their products: | https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37703112 | | But it applies to all sorts of stuff, depending on the | subreddit. Investing advice, sports trivia, historical | facts, whatever. | duxup wrote: | That link didn't really explain anything. | | Are you talking about specific subreddits or topics? | | I've found the negativity on Reddit to be more likely as | to come from completely ignorant sources as anyone with | actual knowledge. I'm pretty surprised anyone on there | for a long period of time would be so trusting of the | community there. | 22289d wrote: | > Are you talking about specific subreddits or topics? | | I'm talking about the culture of the entire site. From | tiny subreddits to huge ones and every topic. | | > I've found the negativity on Reddit to be more likely | as to come from completely ignorant sources as anyone | with actual knowledge. | | Maybe we're talking about different things here. You seem | to be referring to jerks. I was referring to people | calling stuff out. People can call things out politely. | One could say you're doing it right now - you disagree | with me and you're explaining why. You're not being | negative but what you're doing would be an example of | what I mean. Redditors do this. If they see something | they think is wrong, they say so. Sometimes in great | numbers. Sometimes politely, sometimes very rude. | Sometimes with the IQ of a hamster and sometimes it's a | genius. But they let you know. | | > I'm pretty surprised anyone on there for a long period | of time would be so trusting of the community there. | | I don't know what you mean by trusting. They're not | always right. I don't automatically believe whatever they | say. It's like in Jackie Brown. 'You can't trust melanie, | but you can always trust melanie to be melanie.' I trust | Reddit to be Reddit. If they see something they don't | agree with or think is false or think is misleading or | think is not the best way - they're gonna let you know. | bnralt wrote: | Same, in my experience it's the opposite. The downvoting | and moderation creates an echo chamber where there are | certain things get accepted as obvious facts that don't | have much (or any) basis. Once that happens, almost | everyone seems to uncritically repeat that without | bothering to see if it's actually true, and anyone who | questions it is downvoted off the page (or in more extreme | cases, the posts are removed/the user is blocked). | | Reddit also seems to suffer from something you see in a lot | of online communities, where in the valley of the blind the | one eyed man is king. People with a slight amount | experience (or even hobbyists that just post a lot) get | taken as authoritative sources that can't be questioned. | Working on your history degree? You can go to Reddit and be | treated with more authority than most people even give | accomplished historians. One of the many individuals who | served as a squad leader in the army? You can get treated | as if you're an expert on all things military and are able | to more accurately predict the outcome of conflicts than | the Defense Department is. | newZWhoDis wrote: | >That culture is damned effective at filtering out bullshit | and bad actors and getting to the facts. | | Meanwhile the "inverse Reddit" investing strategy works even | better than "inverse Cramer" | | Reddit comments are the whiskey to YouTube comment's beer on | the stupidity index. | 22289d wrote: | I guess it depends at what point you buy. A lot of people | on Reddit got generational fuck you money betting on GME, | Bitcoin and a lot of other stuff. But if you're getting | your Reddit tips from CNN then ya you're probably too late. | romafirst3 wrote: | Have you seen the receipts or are you just parroting what | they are saying on social media? | 22289d wrote: | lol parroting what they say on social media. | | Very interesting way you put that and sorta gets to the | heart of the matter. | | To me it doesn't even make sense, like, why would I get | my information on social media. I'm telling you what I've | seen on Reddit. But you went to what people say other | places. Which is clearly how a lot of you are getting | your information. | | And ya, I've seen the receipts. I've got some receipts of | my own. | wholinator2 wrote: | Just for context, your responses read here as full of | sarcasm and self assurance. I think your ideas might be | more well received if you communicated them with a kinder | and more accepting tone. For what it's worth it does | sound like you spend a lot of time in toxic online | communities, and i believe you have an expertise in those | areas. | 22289d wrote: | Man, HN has sure changed. Clearly I'm not among fellow | hackers if people are worried about tone rather than | truth. | | If someone needs their ass kissed to recognize I'm right, | that's on them. Not me. | duxup wrote: | I'm suspecting this other user has some naive / | ideological-ish belief in the reddit community or | something. | 22289d wrote: | Probably what's happening is I'm doing a poor job of | communicating what I mean. To me if I say 'they aren't | always right' that's enough and I have clearly | articulated that Reddit can be and is on a regular basis, | completely idiotic, absurdly wrong and all flavor of | other bad things. But evidently not as people keep saying | things like you just did. | kortilla wrote: | > That culture is damned effective at filtering out bullshit | and bad actors and getting to the facts. | | Lol, that's not at all what the culture is good at. It's an | internet mob with famous examples of false accusations, | doxxing and harassment. Any subreddit that isn't severely | moderated is gamed by people who know how to appeal to the | local crowd. | | Being cynical and anti-business is not about "getting to the | facts". It just means they need a different type of | marketing. | TeMPOraL wrote: | > _Lol, that's not at all what the culture is good at. It's | an internet mob with famous examples of false accusations, | doxxing and harassment._ | | You're both wrong :). There is no "Reddit culture"; on | Reddit, culture is scoped to a _subreddit_. You and GP are | likely hanging out on different kinds of subreddits - but | if your experience is that of "an internet mob with famous | examples of false accusations, doxxing and harassment", I | strongly suggest you rethink which subreddits you follow. | Yes, they probably need a different type of marketing, but | they're probably also not worth it for technical products. | | > _Being cynical and anti-business is not about "getting to | the facts"._ | | It's hard to tell, because cynicism and healthy realism | overlap nearly 100% when it comes to modern business. | 22289d wrote: | > There is no "Reddit culture"; on Reddit, culture is | scoped to a subreddit. | | There is both. | | For example, anonymity. There is nothing stopping people | from using their real name as their username or openly | revealing who they are, where they live and work etc. But | the Reddit culture is to be anonymous. | | Are there exceptions? Yes. But those exceptions don't | change that it's an anonymous culture. | 22289d wrote: | I can see that Reddit really hurt you. On behalf of the | community, I'm sorry. | | > It just means they need a different type of marketing. | | That's correct. And Step #1 is to have a product which will | make it past the collective bullshit detector. Step #2 is | to provide real and actual value. To have a legitimately | good product. | | So much of marketing is built on deception. If you try to | deceive Redditors, you're going to get told to fk urself. | | People who can't complete step 1 or 2 and want to employ | deception-based marketing often tell a tail like yours. | It's our fault for not just taking what you tell us at face | value and handing over our money. | | However all of the people appending 'Reddit' to their | search queries instead of reading the deception-based | marketing pages that fill up Google results, may understand | where I'm coming from. | [deleted] | bigbillheck wrote: | I've been a reddit user for a number of years, and while | there are indeed some good subreddits, by and large my | experience lines up with kortilla's. | kortilla wrote: | You have way too much faith in reddit and it's given you | a huge blind spot. | | It's trivial for companies to get past Reddit's "bullshit | detector". Just sound like a scrappy small business that | cares deeply about users and not money. | | There is a trail of overfunded kickstarters with nothing | to show years later that demonstrates how gullible | redditors are. | | Your overconfidence in a bunch of armchair experts is | exactly why they are so gullible. Being susceptible to | marketing is one thing. Thinking you're not is so much | worse. | | > I can see that Reddit really hurt you. On behalf of the | community, I'm sorry. | | You don't speak for the community of which I'm a part. | They also didn't hurt me, they hurt the people they | doxxed and I watched it happen years ago. That's why | there are strict doxxing bans now. | | Redditors as a collective are as dumb as the average | population (everyone gets equal votes), which doesn't | make for a good SNR. | | > However all of the people appending 'Reddit' to their | search queries instead of reading the deception-based | marketing pages that fill up Google results, may | understand where I'm coming from. | | I do this too, but what you're failing to grasp is that | you don't realize you're also reading deception-based | marketing pages. Corporations wised up to social media a | decade ago and have armies of social media experts that | know exactly how to target various online communities. | throwaway743 wrote: | > I can see that Reddit really hurt you. On behalf of the | community, I'm sorry. | | Dude doesn't seem hurt, they're just spitting facts. | 22289d wrote: | That was an extremely biased and jaded characterization | that focuses only on a narrow set of negatives. | | Have those things happened on Reddit? Ya. Was that in any | way an accurate summary of what Reddit is? No. And it's | absurd to claim that it is. | | "But look at this example and this one" | | I could make a huge list of the times Reddit has been | bad, too. That doesn't change a single thing about what I | just said. | wholinator2 wrote: | I think the problem is that we're talking about "reddit" | like it's one group of people who have the same | characteristic responses to things across time. But the | whole point of reddit is for there to be disparate | communities who may or may not communicate with each | other and may or may not share or hold diametrically | opposing views on any topic that can be written in words. | | When submitting to reddit, you elplicitely cannot submit | just to "reddit", you have to choose a subreddit. These | subreddit can be as varied in response as humans can, | even when apparently sharing the same topic/goal. | Subreddits turn toxic sometimes, sometimes they're made | that way intentionally. Some are hard fought places of | positive intent with strong moderation and some are 'wild | west'. Sometimes places get toxic enough that someone | else creates a similarly named subreddit with an | identical goal but attempts to cultivate and moderate a | positive environment. If you didn't know about this you'd | see 2 identical subreddits, when you post you'll get 2 | very different receptions. | | "Reddit"s response is entirely dependent upon subreddit. | We cannot argue about how "reddit" reacts, and it's | impractical to talk about individual redditors, the | communities within, the subreddits, are the unit about | which we can have meaningful conversation. There's no | point in arguing about whether reddit has hurt someone or | not or whether their reception was beneficial or | degrading the community without knowing _which_ | Community. There are places that will hurt everyone, | there are places that will reject every product, there | are places that won't. They are different places | 22289d wrote: | > These subreddit can be as varied in response as humans | can | | I've never been anywhere on Reddit that doesn't have the | specific characteristic that I'm referring to. If people | think you are wrong, they tell you. If they think you're | lying or spinning bullshit, they say so. If they think | your method is suboptimal, they let you know the way they | think is best. | | This also applies to people on HN. We're engaged in it | right now. | romphl wrote: | One example that came to mind was Apollo app where their | users came to bat for them during that whole third-party apps | fiasco. | callalex wrote: | Also keep in mind that people tend to be in a bad mood when you | do the digital equivalent of tapping them on the shoulder while | they are wearing headphones and concentrating. | kioleanu wrote: | That's super ideal as opposed to what I've got on Reddit, which | is extremely graphic porn comments on an Ad for a product | designed for parents for their children. The comments were | basically phantasies of girls in different circumstances. I've | reported the comment to Reddit and they came back and said | "yeah, we're not going to be removing that as it doesn't | violate our community guidelines". I closed the account then | and there. Apart from that, I would get about 5 or 6 real users | per hundred clicks from them, where the clicks costed something | like 20-30 cents. Money out the window. | [deleted] | mft_ wrote: | Not dissimilar to HN then :) | | 'Show HN' posts often have a mix of different comparatively | negative comments: from the (classic) I could do this | quicker/cheaper/easily, alternatives being posted, genuine | criticisms (+/- misunderstandings) of the offering, criticism | of the underlying website due to choices made around | design/fonts/contrast/processor utilisation/JS use... | | It's such a nice surprise when there's a 'Show HN' and the | comments are predominantly supportive and/or positive! | hzzhdev wrote: | A buddy of mine actually shared his product on Show HN and I | was worried he would more or less get dumped on because I | know how the HN crowd can be so negative towards stuff. To my | surprise the feedback was actually very supportive and any | criticism he received was constructive and not hateful. | TeMPOraL wrote: | Truth is, you're more likely to get positive feedback if | you're posting something genuine or at least useful. | Negativity is often a (justified) response to ads, | marketing fluff, and lazy attempts at "growth hacking". | j45 wrote: | Unless the HN crowd is the customer base the feedback can | be relative anyways. | | Lots of people don't end up shipping and sometimes the | allergic reaction to someone else shipping says more about | the commenter than what's being shared. | waynesonfire wrote: | I like the mixed reviews. A lot of times there is truth in | the non-positive feedback. It's the authors ego that gets | hurt and to that I say, deal with it. | mft_ wrote: | Totally with you - feedback is a gift. The challenge (in | all fora, not just HN!) is parsing out the well-meaning, | helpful, truthful feedback from the other noise. | flir wrote: | I value the alternatives - it gets all the tools of the same | class on the same page. If I was putting up a "Show HN" post, | I'd definitely add all the similar tools I'd found in a | follow-up comment. | mistrial9 wrote: | > People just love to hate | | no, people are suffering themselves, competitive pressures, | personal failure and doubt, but more the external F-U | response.. drugs like alcohol also play a part.. What is true | is that without actual interaction, the social filters change | quickly | konschubert wrote: | Yea, it's pretty normal - people are rightfully try to poke at | your solution before they spend money on it. | | Sometimes they are simply not the target market (yet) and | that's okay. | Buttons840 wrote: | Go a step further, write some company blog posts outlining how | to do it yourself. Do a good job, honestly show how easy it is | to host your own alternative, you're making the world a better | place by doing so. | | You want readers to think "that would be easy, maybe I'll do | it". They start to believe it's important they have what you're | offering and they think they'll do it themselves. | | Well, we know how attention spans are these days, if something | takes 30 minutes of work it will probably never get done. Most | of the people will give up, and a lot of them will buy your | hosted service instead because they've already convinced | themselves it's important. If it's important enough to someone | that they would spend their time on it, they'll spend money on | it too. You want people willing to spend time / money on | something to have good will towards your company. | vageli wrote: | I think this really works. While at Datadog, at one point I | would write deep dives on monitoring applications like | HAProxy, OpenStack and others. I would start with what to | look for, how to monitor those things with off-the-shelf | tooling, and finally how to do it with Datadog. The response | from the community was overall very positive, regardless of | whether or not they ended up converting to users (though many | did). | [deleted] | tayo42 wrote: | As long as it's tastefully done. I forgot what it was but I | was reading something like this to learn and they plugged | their product like every 2 paragraphs. It came off really | incincere and I wasn't even sure if the content was | trustworthy at that point. | duxup wrote: | That's a really great bridge into "hey here is the fairly | functional / maybe naive path" that lets the dev imagine "oh | but all the exceptions and the ... oh yeah this is more than | <just logging or something else/>". | | Now we're on a track where we understand the value more than | the front page of a website that "hey we sell <boiled down | product description that to a dev doesn't sound like much>". | draw_down wrote: | [dead] | meiraleal wrote: | > "I could do this 3x cheaper myself" | | There is always someone that think they can do it faster and | better but happens to never do anything that anybody buys. | randomdata wrote: | That is how they can do it 3x cheaper. When you do not spend | your time dealing with the business, marketing, etc. that | frees up a lot of time and thus cost. | | If one was looking to open it up to a wider audience, it | would see their costs rise 3x too, but if one is only looking | to use something for internal use there isn't much need to | incur any of those additional costs. | duxup wrote: | >"I could do this 3x cheaper myself" | | Such an easy thing to say. | | Then when I say it and think "I really just need a little bit | of what this does, and this API is kinda complicated for that." | and I go and start creating the thing it evolves and changes | and "Hey this looks a lot like that complicated API ... | ooooooohhhhh I see why that is what it is... this is going to | take a long while." | | It's just so easy to boil down something into something simple | and think that's all it is, but do even that thing reliably and | all the corner cases and other things you need, suddenly you | find it is way more than your initial poo pooing if whatever | the thing is. | antisthenes wrote: | "I could do this 3x cheaper myself if I set my hourly rate at | 0$/hour" is a more accurate description of reality. | JohnFen wrote: | > Such an easy thing to say. | | Everything is easy for the people who don't have to do it! | hermitcrab wrote: | "We do these things, not because they are easy, but because | we think they are easy" | devmor wrote: | I'm fairly sure the Twitter portion is because they named their | product synonymous to a common social media expression for | "share a picture of your (male) genitalia". | | It's an unfortunate scenario for anyone who had to look at | those tweets, I'm sure. | aeonik wrote: | I'm confused, do you mean "PostHog"? I've never heard of this | being used that way. | birdyrooster wrote: | I assume they are converted Muslims who observe the Quran. | rideontime wrote: | If you search twitter for "post hog," the very first result | is a person sharing a photograph of their erect penis. | devmor wrote: | Yes, "hog" is slang for penis. Telling someone to "post | hog" is a particularly common expression among more... | online leftists. A degradation of their character, | basically telling them that their opinions are worthless so | they had better have a large member to make up for it. | __jonas wrote: | It's 100% this, the only place I've heard about this thing | before seeing it on hn is people making fun of the name. | | Then again, I've seen memes about it several times from | completely outside of the dev/tech sphere because of this, so | maybe in a way it works since it made me look up the company. | wantsanagent wrote: | I was surprised youtube channel sponsorships didn't make this | list, at least for consideration. I have _multiple_ specialized | adblockers installed (as I 'm sure many here do) and so the only | ads I encounter are baked into content I'm otherwise interested | in. Currently vpn products and tutorial sites dominate these | channels and so I'd almost _welcome_ something else. | weinzierl wrote: | I'm the same and I think it's more like _a_ vpn product, _a_ | tutorial site and _a_ certain website builder, where we all | know which specific companies I mean. | gbillig wrote: | Check out SponsorBlock for skipping YouTube ads that are baked | into the video | bombcar wrote: | Watching old videos is always amusing when the sponsor part | about a company that since died comes up. | MaKey wrote: | SponsorBlock (https://github.com/ajayyy/SponsorBlock) to the | rescue! | pydry wrote: | I feel more bad about using this than a regular ad blocker. | With a regular ad blocker it's blocking ads for which the | lion's share is probably going to | $facelessabusivecorporation, whereas sponsorships go 100% | into the pockets of content creators who typically aren't | exactly rich. | | It feels less like downloading pirated music and more like | sneaking into an indie concert without paying. | dave7 wrote: | Nah can't feel bad using Sponsorblock - it tells you when | it skips a chunk, and makes it very easy (just press | Enter!) to skip back, check what they're going to talk | about - and if it's of no interest just tap Enter again to | resume. That way I can see if my favourite Youtube channels | are promoting something I might actually be interested in, | but Raid Shadow Legends, Raycon and Ridge Wallet can be | skipped every time. | Liquix wrote: | I would be happy to pay content creators the money they | deserve for high quality content. But no matter how good | the video is, it's not worth sitting through pitches trying | to convince or manipulate you into spending money. At that | point I would rather receive lower quality content with no | ads. | | It's not that people don't want to financially support | creators. It's that the targeted advertising business has | become so manipulative and hostile that some people _do not | want to see ads_ for any product in any context. | carlosjobim wrote: | > I would be happy to pay content creators the money they | deserve for high quality content. | | You can do that with YouTube Premium + Sponsorblock. Or | pay them in other ways while blocking all ads. | ajsnigrutin wrote: | This is like fast forwarding through an ad, but done | automatically. I don't feel bad at all, some videos have | 50%+ or more removed, and with some settings, you can | remove also all the self-promotion, "like and subcribe" and | other useless crap from the videos. | satvikpendem wrote: | It's something I'd skip manually via the arrow keys or seek | bar anyway, so why not automate the process? | | And anyway you can white-list creators you like. | SponsorBlock is actually more useful for me to skip filler | intro and ending content than to actually skip sponsors, | which you can configure it not to skip if you so choose. | oldtownroad wrote: | Sponsorships rarely go 100% into the pockets of creators. | The share varies but it can be anywhere from 25% to 75% | because these sponsorships typically come through agencies | and management takes a cut too. | kortilla wrote: | They already made the money, they don't get paid for | shilling by you watching. | tomjen3 wrote: | You can support most of them with Patrion if you want. | | Other than that making the video is a sunk cost, the only | company you cost money is Google. | Belphemur wrote: | It really depends on the video, and the brand sponsoring | for me. | | I had enough of Raycon, Raid Legend and other bullcrap | VPNs. Especially when those sponsors got greedy by asking a | 2 minute and on a 8 minutes video. That's a quarter of it. | | So I don't feel bad anymore for sponsorblock. | corobo wrote: | > whereas sponsorships go 100% into the pockets of content | creators | | They get paid ad revenue based on ads served, they already | got paid for the sponsorship. | | Personally I feel that this is the wrong way round (however | I'm totally morally ok with blocking ads of all kinds, I'd | be a hypocrite otherwise, ads suck) | lolinder wrote: | They get paid for the sponsorship based in part on how | many people watch the sponsorship sections of past | videos. That can be and is measured, and has a material | effect on the amount companies will pay. | corobo wrote: | Sounds like they're still being paid then. There's zero | pay when blocking ads. | lolinder wrote: | There's zero pay if 100% of their viewers blocked ads. | There would _also_ be zero pay if 100% of their viewers | used SponsorBlock. | | I'm not saying that on the balance it's wrong to use | SponsorBlock (I'm a heavy ad blocker myself, and most of | the arguments against SponsorBlock also apply to ad | blocking in general), just that you can't justify it by | pretending that you using SponsorBlock doesn't cost them | anything. | [deleted] | [deleted] | carlosjobim wrote: | Are you sure about this? Is this a service that YouTube | provides? Otherwise they wouldn't know except for the | usage of promo codes. | lolinder wrote: | I know that the content creators have access to this | information, and anecdotally I've heard that it's part of | the negotiation process, but to be fair I don't know that | for sure. | corobo wrote: | Aw man, I knew that was bollocks! Haha | | I've not come across this as a negotiation thing directly | or anecdotally, gave you the benefit of the doubt as | maybe it was a super new thing that's not hit my radar | yet. | | We'd be giving ChatGPT the business for hallucinating, my | theory is it learned to do that from internet forums :P | oldtownroad wrote: | Broad appeal to a casual technical audience is why you see the | same type of sponsorships. VPNs are very high margin and easy | to convert. You'll see the same in across other types of | content, e.g: recipe boxes (Hello Fresh) are very common for | lifestyle channels, grooming (Manscaped) is very common for | male audience channels and language learning apps are very | common in educational circles. | | A platform like PostHog would struggle to find the right | audience on YouTube because it's such a niche product. | JCharante wrote: | Fireship, Theo, Primeagen, and the rest of developer-tube is | the right spot for advertising for developer tools. | willsmith72 wrote: | > Each experiment will need ~$500 | | Woah, do you really need to spend this much on 1 experiment to | get quality data? That kinda sucks | tuyenhx wrote: | 2 weeks and $500. Everyday is around $35. Based on my | experience, it is quite a reasonable number. | qingcharles wrote: | I don't know how you can get data with such a tiny spend, to be | honest. | | From experience, I would have thought at _least_ $2000 per | test. | | I've been doing PPC stuff for 20 years. As soon as someone | tells me they are doing PPC I ask them how they enjoy setting | fire to all their money. Unless you have oodles of time to | spend optimizing it and measuring it, you are guaranteed to | just burn all your cash. It is very, very hard to win on PPC. | One of the biggest problems is that unknowledgeable people in | each domain are bidding on PPC ads without monitoring their | spending or conversions and wasting their money, but their ads | are bumping up the price of yours too. | willsmith72 wrote: | geez. I've been thinking of doing some fake door tests but | wanted to launch something like 10-20 experiments. Even at | $500 that's 5-10k, which is not feasible. How can any startup | afford these tests? | | If I ran 10 experiments/week, with the $2k measure, you're | looking at 80k/month, just to get some validation. | qingcharles wrote: | It depends on your cost-per-click, or cost-per-action. If | you were in a niche that was pennies per action then you | could do it on a smaller budget. It's just that you require | a lot of data to get any meaningful results. My PPC traffic | wavers up and down and it would be hard to know if it was | the weather or some other factor unless you had enough | traffic to average things out. | bongobingo1 wrote: | > Quora | | > | | > Dark horse - good for conversion and awareness. | | > Quite cheap, good targeting. | | > Seriously, I don't know why more people don't use Quora. | | Amazed to hear that. All my homies hate Quora, I would assume its | the same amongst other developer groups. | diarrhea wrote: | To this day I'm still confused about where questions and | answers start and stop, respectively. | AlpineIvyPhD wrote: | this works with your username a little too well... | mhh__ wrote: | Quora used to be amazing... | glitchalumni wrote: | I was quite convinced that Quora only consists of SEO spam | nowadays - kind of a surprise reading that there are real | people using it. | 2rsf wrote: | And surprisingly there are real people giving more than | decent answers in Quora on things ranging from relationships | through electric cars to software engineering. | | Who are those people is a good question, as I never met or | heard of someone answering in Quora, and it is rare to see | links to answers in it. | aquariusDue wrote: | A few years back I used to love browsing Quora, I had tamed | my feed in such a way that it showed mostly relevant (to | me) content that I enjoyed. | | For example Alan Kay used to be pretty active on there, and | other experts in different fields. As always you had to be | careful to take everything with a grain of salt because | some people used Quora as a creative writing outlet and it | wasn't always obvious. Others ran business scams (sometimes | not the get rich quick variety) and there was a famous-ish | one made by someone called Gordon Miller on there (but I | can't recall all the details). | | But there was a lot of good stuff too, for example there | was a guy in the fitness circles who accidentally used | Quora as a springboard to a YouTube channel (Geoffrey | Verity Schofield). But my favorite memory of Quora remains | reading Richard Muller's answers regarding physics and life | in general (and enjoying them very much) and then years | later stumbling upon a book in a book shop that he wrote | (Now: The Physics of Time). I don't know why but weirdly I | felt more connected to the "creators" on Quora than the | ones on other social media. | | Long anecdote over, last time I browsed Quora was almost | two years ago sadly. | klempner wrote: | The flip side here: the ads I get on Quora are just terrible -- | about 1/3 of it is some "stud briefs" underwear and about 1/3 | is promoted CCP propaganda. | | These are the ads of "they can't come up with enough ads to | show me because not enough people are advertising on this | platform". | joshstrange wrote: | Quora being a good option is incredibly surprising to me. I never | click on Quora links as 90% of the time the "answers" are just | ads or people who want to pretend they are a bigger deal than | they are and know more than they do. | | I'm a little surprised podcast ads weren't tried, mostly because | I'd love to know how well those do/don't work out for a tool like | this. | ryder9 wrote: | [dead] | two_handfuls wrote: | Same. The Quora website feels actively user-hostile, I avoid | it. | smithcoin wrote: | Just like Reddit- it wasn't always that way. | cushychicken wrote: | [flagged] | _Algernon_ wrote: | "organic" | pembrook wrote: | Hate to be the bearer of bad news, but virtually all social | media sites add "nofollow" to links posted on their platform. | | This means the link is worthless for your domain authority | and tells Google to essentially ignore these links because | UGC is notorious for spam. So I doubt it's having much affect | on your organic SEO at all and could in fact be a total waste | of your time. | | Google has known about comment spam for basically 2 decades. | cushychicken wrote: | I didn't know that. You learn something new every day. | | Still, it's been a great method for getting people to take | interest in my website. | [deleted] | mort96 wrote: | I hope you recognize that you're everything that's wrong with | the modern web. | cushychicken wrote: | _doffs cap_ And a good day to you as well. | marcosdumay wrote: | I never consciously click on Quora links. Yet, I very often | end-up there because I clicked something without checking what | it is, and their SEO is extremely effective. | | It never helps either, so I go back. And I don't think any ad | pass through my ad-blocker. But I'm not very surprised by the | ads there being useful. | callalex wrote: | It's great for advertisers for the same reason people still use | Nigerian prince scams: the victim has already demonstrated a | clear lack of judgment and high susceptibility to bullshit. | nlunbeck wrote: | Most people I know who actively use Quora are in the 65+ | demographic. I've asked what's keeping them, and it turns out | they have much more tolerance for things like sponsored posts | and mandatory signups than most users would | 22289d wrote: | a) that isn't what's keeping them. people don't stay | somewhere because things that bother you, don't bother | them. you didn't name anything they like about it. | | b) the mandatory signup meme is and has always been | ridiculous. it takes 8 seconds to create an account. for | anyone who gets value out of something, that's not a big | ask. if you're not willing to spend 8 seconds then it | wasn't for you anyway. | 22289d wrote: | That's my impression of Quora today too. | | It was such a special place in the early years. Sad to see what | they let happen to it. The saddest part is that it's surely | deliberate. They have some really, really smart people working | there. And they decided this is what they want. | brettermeier wrote: | While I try reading this, the site loads something and scrolls to | the top of the page, even on 2. try. Who designed this? This page | sucks. | probably_wrong wrote: | Looks good to me using Firefox for Android, but I tried Chrome | and there it looks a bit weird. | | Perhaps it's time for a "Best viewed on Firefox" button? | naillo wrote: | The importance of and consequences of not dogfooding | robertlagrant wrote: | MacOS Firefox fine. | _a_a_a_ wrote: | Disable JS & it works lovely. Not the first time I've found | blocking JS has unborked a borked web page either. | | @james_impliu: I like simple text websites. Why do web devs | love making simple things complex? | ilrwbwrkhv wrote: | Because most new web devs have simply never made a html page | served on apache before. | | It's mind-blowing but a lot of people think react, nextjs and | vercel (to pick a random provider) is the only way to make | web apps. | satvikpendem wrote: | It's not the only way of course, but as someone who's made | pure HTML pages served on Apache or nginx, React and NextJS | sure are nice to have. | LeonM wrote: | Can confirm this. When scrolling down to about half-way through | the article it jumps back up. It appears to happen when the | blog list on the left is loaded (which takes like 5 seconds to | load). | | I can see why the dev didn't notice this when debugging | locally, as there it probably loads the left menu without | delay. | james_impliu wrote: | Yikes, I'm the founder of this company (one of my colleagues | wrote this piece) - just saw it appear here. We shipped a | rather huge change to the website recently (we're trying to let | other people post stuff too), think we accidentally made it | janky and missed this. Will fix when the right person wakes up | - he's west coast US! Sorry for QA via HN :) | cwillu wrote: | FWIW, fully a quarter of the screen is taken up by fixed | position elements that are entirely irrelevant to a reader. | When I see this on sites I want or have to use, I add | cosmetic rules to delete the sticky elements. When I see it | on sites I don't have to use, I close the tab. | | I don't claim that this makes it a net loss for you from a | money standpoint, nor that I'm representative of a majority | of your market, but I _do_ suspect I'm the sort of potential | customer that isn't easily studied in an A/B test. | | Cheers! | blast wrote: | If you're talking about that obnoxious left sidebar, I | agree. The table of contents widget on the right too. The | article itself is squeezed between a bunch of shit I don't | want to look at. It makes the page feel crowded and like | it's trying to get me. Please just let us read the content! | If it's any good, it'll speak for itself. | satvikpendem wrote: | I use a hide sticky extension / web script, works great for | removing all this sticky header garbage so that I can | actually read the content. | jjgreen wrote: | I didn't see that until I enabled JS on the page. Just | sayin', | EspressoGPT wrote: | Where do you host this site? It's freaking fast. | mgbmtl wrote: | Seems to be Vercel / Next.js (I'm not affiliated, only did | an IP lookup because I was curious) | daanlo wrote: | Great article! ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-09-29 23:00 UTC)