[HN Gopher] 50 years later, is Two-Phase Locking the best we can... ___________________________________________________________________ 50 years later, is Two-Phase Locking the best we can do? Author : ingve Score : 34 points Date : 2023-09-29 16:51 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com) (TXT) w3m dump (concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com) | Sharminkhant wrote: | [flagged] | mgaunard wrote: | MVCC is what most databases do. | onedognight wrote: | 2500 years later and the best hypotenuse algorithm is still | Pythagoras'. | convolvatron wrote: | this is a great paper that provides a framework for comparing 2 | phase and paxos. | | https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/video/consensus-on-transac... | thoughtlede wrote: | Two-phase locking is different from two-phase commit, in spite | of an overlap in their naming. Two-phase commit is relevant to | be compared against Paxos - both of which fall under the | category of consensus protocols. | | Two-phase locking is a concurrency control mechanism. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-09-29 23:00 UTC)