[HN Gopher] 50 years later, is Two-Phase Locking the best we can...
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       50 years later, is Two-Phase Locking the best we can do?
        
       Author : ingve
       Score  : 34 points
       Date   : 2023-09-29 16:51 UTC (6 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (concurrencyfreaks.blogspot.com)
        
       | Sharminkhant wrote:
       | [flagged]
        
       | mgaunard wrote:
       | MVCC is what most databases do.
        
       | onedognight wrote:
       | 2500 years later and the best hypotenuse algorithm is still
       | Pythagoras'.
        
       | convolvatron wrote:
       | this is a great paper that provides a framework for comparing 2
       | phase and paxos.
       | 
       | https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/video/consensus-on-transac...
        
         | thoughtlede wrote:
         | Two-phase locking is different from two-phase commit, in spite
         | of an overlap in their naming. Two-phase commit is relevant to
         | be compared against Paxos - both of which fall under the
         | category of consensus protocols.
         | 
         | Two-phase locking is a concurrency control mechanism.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-09-29 23:00 UTC)