[HN Gopher] Researchers mined an old drug forum and fed the entr... ___________________________________________________________________ Researchers mined an old drug forum and fed the entries to an AI Author : Hooke Score : 42 points Date : 2023-10-02 21:47 UTC (1 days ago) (HTM) web link (pioneerworks.org) (TXT) w3m dump (pioneerworks.org) | beefman wrote: | Erowid is great, but the trip reports were universally fanciful, | typically having no real connection to the drug (often drugs) | being described. It became a literary form of their own, and | something of an inside joke among psychedelic users. | droopyEyelids wrote: | I saw some discussion around the flaws of mri imaging to study | cognitive states. | | If i recall correctly, something like 70% of people fall asleep | in the MRI so theres no baseline brain state to compare. | ProjectArcturis wrote: | I did fMRI research for 12 years. You are not recalling | correctly. | flenserboy wrote: | Let's hope that lots of old forums in other areas of interest | (programming, engineering, etc.) are preserved so that the same | sort of work can be done. A current forum which would be most | interesting to see results from would be the Ray Peat Forum, for | better or for worse. | dylan604 wrote: | What happens if we go back too far in the forums and the AI | starts suggesting the use of leeches and the letting of blood? | flenserboy wrote: | What happens if we find out some dismissed cures/methods | actually have value? That could really upend things. | ipaddr wrote: | How would one take an existing forum and transform it into a | model that could be used? | rideontime wrote: | Will Erowid and/or its users be at all compensated for providing | the data for this? | cypherpunks01 wrote: | "All information on Erowid.org is provided non-commercially for | purposes of teaching, scholarship, research, and criticism." | | The point of the website is to collect information about drugs | for education and research purposes. It's a 501c3 nonprofit, | which operates explicitly for public education. It's funded by | donors, not by consumers of the info collected. | ShamelessC wrote: | Did you ever use the site? It was like a handshake agreement | situation where you had no idea how full of shit the posts | were. If people weren't outright lying, they could (very well) | be experiencing wish fulfillment or placebo. Many of the | "negative" experiences were similar - describing reactions that | were frankly hard to believe. Posts tended towards fictional | exaggeration. Further, many users were anonymous, pseudonymous, | lying about identity, or posting in a time when many believed | no one would be probing through the internet trying to identify | folks. | | tl;dr - I seriously doubt any of the users wants to be | identified, much less compensated for providing "data". | rideontime wrote: | That's been my experience with the site, too, which made me | raise my eyebrow at the article's claim of "first-hand | testimonials that have been vetted for authenticity and | accuracy." If the data's such junk (which I surely won't | argue with), why study it? | | e: From the original paper: | | > Rigorous quality control is conducted by trained experts | with careful consideration given to "quality, credibility, | and focus on effects or outcomes" (www.erowid.org). By means | of that mechanism, all reports that provided the basis for | the present investigation have successfully exceeded a | standard quality filter. | | Totally. | dylan604 wrote: | I once had a disagreement with a lead dev for an in-house | tool that was a glorified DAM. their forms were not kept up | to date, and so users were forced to enter bad data which | skewed query results. when pressed about why the fields | were forced to choose from an outdated pre-populated enum, | i was told "bad data is better than no data". | | maybe the AI researchers are from the same school of | thought. having bad/unvetted medical data/advice on | psychedelics would be better than no data at all, right? /s | morkalork wrote: | The trip reports for datura are legendary for their | outlandishness. | | On point though, many of the chemicals in question aren't | legal so not sure how much users would want to be | identified.. | deleriousmuffin wrote: | If you had actually ever tried datura, there's no way you'd | be so dismissive of people's reports of using it as being | "outlandish". | plussed_reader wrote: | Yes, no true scotsman would dismiss a datura trip report. | redavni wrote: | Research is very clearly covered under fair use. | rideontime wrote: | Even when you do it to develop a commercial product? | 0xcde4c3db wrote: | Research falls under "purpose and character of the use", | which is only one of the four factors considered in fair use | analysis. I gather a court _could_ decide that this outweighs | the other factors, but I doubt that can safely be taken for | granted as a general rule. | brandall10 wrote: | As someone who contributed to the site many years ago, I am | more than happy for my experiences to be used in this fashion. | cypherpunks01 wrote: | Erowid is a member-supported organization providing access to | reliable, non-judgmental information about psychoactive plants, | chemicals, and related issues. (from mission statement) | | Anyone who has benefited from Erowid's psychoactive drug info | should consider donating! | | https://erowid.org/donations/ | visarga wrote: | I was sure it was going to be Erowid. | [deleted] ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-10-03 23:00 UTC)