[HN Gopher] Origins of the 3.5in Floppy Disk [video]
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Origins of the 3.5in Floppy Disk [video]
        
       Author : zdw
       Score  : 52 points
       Date   : 2023-10-22 00:04 UTC (1 days ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com)
        
       | ksec wrote:
       | You know we say magnetic media dont last but my 5.25" Floppy Disk
       | are still readable last time I tested it in 2020 during COVID
       | when I was too bored at home. I have some 8" but the computer
       | that had it wouldn't turn on anymore. The PC with 5.25" and 3.5"
       | still does.
       | 
       | Not the same could be said about CD though. CDs that were pressed
       | are still ok, not so much for burned CD-R. Most of them are full
       | or errors when reading it.
        
         | anonymouskimmer wrote:
         | > not so much for burned CD-R. Most of them are full or errors
         | when reading it.
         | 
         | David Rosenthal tests this periodically. Most recently he
         | tested in August. Notice the first sentence of the quote:
         | https://blog.dshr.org/2023/08/optical-media-durability-updat...
         | 
         | > The drives I use from ASUS and LG report read errors from the
         | CDs but verify the MD5s correctly. I didn't notice them
         | reporting any read errors from the DVDs. An off-brand drive
         | fails to read the CDs, but read one of the older DVDs with no
         | read errors.
         | 
         | > Surprisingly, with no special storage precautions, generic
         | low-cost media, and consumer drives, I'm getting good data from
         | CD-Rs more than 19 years old, and from DVD-Rs nearly 17 years
         | old. Your mileage may vary. Tune in again next year for another
         | episode.
         | 
         | > Last year I found a NetBSD1.2 CD dating from October 1996
         | whose cksum(1) checksums all verified correctly despite a few
         | read errors. That CD was still delivering good data after
         | nearly 26 years, but this year a couple of the checksums
         | failed.
        
           | gattilorenz wrote:
           | That's my experience as well. I recently imaged
           | 
           | - a collection of CD-Roms attached to a computer magazine,
           | 1999-2001
           | 
           | - my own collection of stuff downloaded or backed up around
           | 2003-2004; most of it on Verbatim DVDs, but some on CD-R or
           | CD-RW (likely also from Verbatim)
           | 
           | I had very few read errors, and it was impressive especially
           | considering it's more than 50 CDs and that I never payed too
           | much attention to how they were stored. Most of the computer
           | magazine CDs were stored directly in a "cardboard sleeve",
           | not even one of those plastic/paper ones...
        
         | Tor3 wrote:
         | My 5.25" ones from the mid-eighties are still readable. As far
         | as I can tell the 8" ones are as well, though I haven't tested
         | many of them. But their density is low, which helps a lot. And
         | that's also why none of my 3.5" 1.44MB floppies are readable -
         | the density is a bit too high for what's feasible for that
         | physical medium.
         | 
         | I don't know about later ones, but early CD-R easily failed
         | after less than a year back when I tried to use them as backup
         | media. I quickly abandoned the idea of using them as backup.
        
         | Zardoz84 wrote:
         | My 3.5 floppy disks from early 90's keeps being fine. I a few
         | months ago, I installed the demo of Hallowen Harry, and the
         | Commander Keen 4 copy that comes with the Gravis Game pad, in a
         | 486 without issues.
        
       | jimt1234 wrote:
       | I heard that 3.5" disks were originally marketed as "stiffies" to
       | help differentiate them from "floppies", the older 5.25" and 8"
       | disks. But, as the story goes, someone pulled the plug for
       | obvious reasons. Not sure if that's true; I want it to be true
       | because it's hilarious, though.
        
         | biugbkifcjk wrote:
         | Cathode Ray Dude recently put out a new video on YouTube and
         | mentions "stiffys" in that too.
         | 
         | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lUhDo7euPs
         | 
         | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stiffy_disk
        
       | jerriep wrote:
       | Fun fact: In South Africa we called these a "stiffy" because it
       | was so rigid compared to the 51/4-inch floppy.
        
         | tomxor wrote:
         | :D Hah perfect, I can totally imagine that with the SA
         | accent... and frankly more logical, I never got why they were
         | called floppy disks in most of the world considering their
         | predecessors.
        
       | chx wrote:
       | https://ajovomultja.hu/mcd-1-casette-floppy-marcell-janosi?l...
       | 
       | The rigid floppy was invented in Hungary in 1973, patented in
       | 1974 but only in Hungary and Sony have stolen the idea.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-10-23 09:00 UTC)