[HN Gopher] Show HN: Web app to generate AI pictures with logos ... ___________________________________________________________________ Show HN: Web app to generate AI pictures with logos "hidden" in them Hey there Some time ago I built a site that generates AI pictures in a style of GitHub logo (https://octoart.vercel.app/). It's completely free, and even official GitHub accounts in Twitter and Instagram (yes turns out they have Instagram) posted about it. It was fun. So I thought it would be cool to build an app that works with any logo, so people can generate nice branded pictures with their logo. I went on to build https://logopictureai.com/. It's build with Next.js, Replicate API and Supabase. It's a very early version, I built it in a weekend. It works like this: your upload a logo, type a prompt (or select a predefined one), select number of variations to generate and click a button. Images will be delivered to your email in 2-3 minutes. As I said, it's pretty early and I am not sure if it's really useful. It works decently with most logos, but sometimes can generate something weird. Anyways, would love to hear your thought. Thanks! Author : igorkotua Score : 48 points Date : 2023-10-30 16:54 UTC (6 hours ago) (HTM) web link (logopictureai.com) (TXT) w3m dump (logopictureai.com) | nevodavid10 wrote: | What model in replicate did you use? | igorkotua wrote: | I use a model which is trained to generate QR codes, it works | well with logo too | omneity wrote: | You can use vanilla sdxl with controlnet. | ibdf wrote: | This looks interesting, but honestly, for a tool that can create | infinite amount of images it's odd that you only have 1 low res | logo example on the right side side (which seems to come from | your other project). It's not enough to tell what the | capabilities of the tool are, and it's not enough to get me to | pay for it. I would suggest either a free-trial (even if it's | super short) or provide more examples with different type of | logos. | | FYI: all links on the bottom of your page lead to a 404. (Contact | us Terms & Conditions Refund Policy Blog) | igorkotua wrote: | Yep, website is not polished yet. Definitely should add more | pictures, agree | | I can also add like ~5 free images to new accounts when they | sign up. Adding more might get pricey for me. | | Thanks for your thoughts | solardev wrote: | Side note: Just nitpicking, but on the topic of website | polish, you might want to hire a copywriter (or an AI, I | guess) to rephrase the English text on the page. It sounds | very unnatural right now. | | Example: "You can no longer puzzle over where to get | beautiful pictures" makes it sound like "You can't solve this | picture puzzle anymore", which isn't what you meant. Maybe | something like "Stop worrying and let LogoPicture make you | the perfect brand image" or "Make a beautiful photo with your | logo", etc. | | But that's just one of the many awkward phrases on the page. | isoprophlex wrote: | Also, several grating spelling mistakes. Even running the | copy thru chatgpt would drastically improve matters. | igorkotua wrote: | Thanks for pointing out, yeah it was very fast paced | wscourge wrote: | This website looks real bad on my phone. Google Pixel 4a (5G). | igorkotua wrote: | Yeah sorry about that, it's not mobile optimized yet | wepple wrote: | Same on iPhone; clicked away immediately | RosanaAnaDana wrote: | The number of people hijacking foss tools and wrapping them up | behind paywalls is hilarious. | garrrikkotua wrote: | What do you mean hijacking? | drusepth wrote: | Really just shows how little effort is put into making those | foss tools easy to use for the layperson (NB: not implying that | they should, just that they don't). Turns out people will pay | to be able to use a slightly simplified version of something | cool, that they would otherwise need to "figure out" a bunch of | stuff to get it working. | tayo42 wrote: | Going from cool to usable for general public is a lot of | work. And most of it isn't fun or rewarding. I get why open | source doesn't do that, and why you would want money to go | from solving a problem for your self to solving a problem for | others in an easy way. | solardev wrote: | > Going from cool to usable for general public is a lot of | work. And most of it isn't fun or rewarding. | | As a frontend dev, this is my favorite part of the work! I | wish there was an easy way to find open-source projects | wanting UI help in particular. Is there? | all2 wrote: | Oooh! Ooh! There's a guy who just posted a tool that has | a limited license UI. He said he was going to work on | rolling a new one. You should reach out maybe? | | This guy! https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38044782 | burkaman wrote: | I think it's the same as restaurants "hijacking" cheap | ingredients and serving them up behind a paywall. Just because | you think you could make a tool yourself doesn't mean it's | never worth paying for, even professional chefs will pay for | something pre-made and easy when they're hungry. | kyleyeats wrote: | You have to with this tech. If your thing takes off and you | don't, you're stuck with a huge bill. Then you get leapfrogged | anyway. | xnx wrote: | Here are some instructions for anyone who wants to do this on | their own hardware: https://takin.ai/learn/generate-images-with- | hidden-text-usin... | | Definitely a nice convenience feature to have someone pre-select | the settings, but very doable for anyone with tech experience to | set up by themselves. | teaearlgraycold wrote: | You really need some kind of free-tier, but I understand you're | putting yourself at risk with that. Ideally you could run the | model in the browser with WebGPU for trial users so that they | could bear the cost. | all2 wrote: | I'd be curious about how big the model is. The loading time | could be quite long. I suppose with caching, it won't be a big | deal after the first run, though. | andybak wrote: | It's gonna be SD 1.5 and ControlNet, surely? | broken_clock wrote: | You can get something similar for free here: | | https://huggingface.co/spaces/AP123/IllusionDiffusion | uticus wrote: | I could see how this would be great for special event materials | etc... if the pictures are what I want? There's no way to scroll | through and choose, or even filter or change to get closer to | something I want. So, no. Not interested in paying for a grab- | box/gamble. | | If there were a way to fine-tune, then pick 10 or something, it | would be a lot more useful. Could even watermark or something to | keep freeloaders away, hopefully you get the idea. | porsager wrote: | So the exact same as https://ailogoart.com ? | toddmorey wrote: | Not meant as a criticism, just an observation: The novelty of | these shapes hidden in images is already gone for me. It's | amazing to think how fast the hype cycles around a clever concept | will accelerate with generative AI being so available and easy. | | Meanwhile if people still had to do this stuff by hand in | Photoshop, you could probably milk the gimmick for at least a | couple of years Thomas Kinkade style. | | I'm reminded a bit of million dollar homepage and all the fast- | follow clones that each earned about 86C/. | jprete wrote: | There's also a lack of actual communication. Yes, an AI image | generator can stick a pattern into an otherwise totally | different kind of image. But there's no communicative meaning | there other than what I just mentioned. There's no cleverness, | nothing interesting to discover in the details, no space where | the imagination can fill things in because it's all plainly | arbitrary, no deeper meaning other than a shape embedded in a | pattern fill, however complicated the fill might be. | | I went looking at the details of the original spiral medieval | town and all I found was a woman's skirt standing on its own | with no body. And I know perfectly well the AI isn't trying to | say anything clever with that. | toddmorey wrote: | That's true. Even when AI learns to not put torso-less legs, | the wonder will be gone. | | Prior to AI, you'd stare at an image like this and I believe | most of the magic was marveling at the cleverness & craft of | the person who painstakingly created the illusion. That you | could think, "wow I'd never have the patience, talent, or | dedication to make something like that." | aczerepinski wrote: | Price feels fair for saving me time, but I have no use for a | fairly low-res image. Do brands really want logo images that are | less than 4k resolution and aren't vectorized? | qingcharles wrote: | You have to run it through another AI app to upscale it. That's | how most of these AI images are being done these days. | | Vector is another matter. I don't think you'd want to try to | vectorize the output from this, but again, there are a bunch of | AI tools for doing it. | andybak wrote: | How would these even vectorize? | dvrp wrote: | so, like krea ai? | serial_dev wrote: | But can it write CSS so that the site looks acceptable on | mobile??? | | Snarkiness aside, the website looks awful on mobile, half the | screen is not used, overflow issues, etc. | jsf01 wrote: | I think most of this would be resolved by just reducing the | left and right padding on small screens. If the author is | monitoring this thread, please consider making that update! | Minor49er wrote: | Looking at the "Answers to common questions about LogoPicture | AI", the first question is "Do you offer refunds?" This makes me | think that this is the question that most people are asking. | Hopefully that isn't the case because this looks pretty neat | minimaxir wrote: | The original submission is likely using a ControlNet | implementation. You don't need the special | control_v1p_sd15_qrcode_monster ControlNet that the popular | optical illusions technique uses: the common canny anf depth | ControlNets works fine. | | When ControlNet first became mainstream I generated a fun series | of tech company logo charcuterie boards using the Canny | ControlNet and SD 1.5: | https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/11bp30o/te... | | Of course now with SDXL you can create _very_ good ControlNet- | constrained images. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-10-30 23:00 UTC)