[HN Gopher] Dot by New Computer ___________________________________________________________________ Dot by New Computer Author : _kush Score : 141 points Date : 2023-11-01 17:45 UTC (5 hours ago) (HTM) web link (new.computer) (TXT) w3m dump (new.computer) | FeroTheFox wrote: | Interesting. I just signed up for the waitlist. It seems similar | to Pi (https://pi.ai) in terms of audience and general use case | though. | azinman2 wrote: | The UX was quite different as it seemed the ambition. Pi.ai | just seems like a fine tuned chatgpt that's aimed at being | "supportive," no? | ibejoeb wrote: | Like ChatGPT, sure, but Pi uses internally developed, novel | language models, not OpenAI's. | azinman2 wrote: | Not clear to me what their main differentiating factor is | there. Seems a lot like chatgpt but without any name brand | recognition. | | Experience wasn't particularly helpful at helping me with | problems. | sleepybrett wrote: | Who owns the copyright on mei's grandma's flatbread recipe now? | ghostly_s wrote: | Recipes cannot be copyrighted. | whalesalad wrote: | what if I prefix the recipe with a long rambling anecdote | about my grandpappy's old farm and the smell of fresh | potatoes in the cellar | JohnFen wrote: | The recipe is still not copyrightable. The color commentary | is, but anyone can just strip that out and republish the | recipe in any way they see fit. | maaaaattttt wrote: | Can they be patented though? I was having this thought the | other day and didn't really check. I guess not, but it's kind | of ironic as a patent is basically a recipe. | kevindamm wrote: | Not typically. The mere combination of known ingredients | does not result in a new and non-obvious invention that can | be patented. A patent typically covers a unique or non- | obvious process. There are exceptions, say, if there is a | process that results in a foodstuff having a longer shelf | life, or a novel way of reproducing a flavor (but not the | recipe of the flavoring, per se). Cooking something with | heat is not a unique or non-obvious process. | | You could copyright the exact wording but that wouldn't | protect the recipe itself and simply substituting a | measurement unit may be enough to get around that. You | could make it a trade secret but since the onus is on the | owner to protect it and keep it confidential, that probably | doesn't include publishing it or even sharing it with your | AI assistant. Might involve courtside arguments about | "reasonable expectations of privacy" .. I wouldn't want to | test it. | | It's not like there's specific wording saying that recipes | cannot be patented, but if you can describe it in the | traditional ingredients + preparation steps then it does | not meet patentable criteria. | ryanjshaw wrote: | I'm really intrigued by the idea of something like this as a | desktop OS. I tend to dump files into one location and use search | to pull up what I need, rather than a predetermined structure, | and this seems like a good fit for me. | christiangenco wrote: | Something like this is most certainly going to become the | mainstream interface for computing. I think the most likely thing | that will hit mass market adoption will look much more like the | voice interface in Her than a chat app. I couldn't imagine my mom | getting much utility out of an app like this but if the AI is | good enough I could certainly see her chatting with her phone as | if it was a person. | javawizard wrote: | > will look much more like the voice interface in Her | | What's Her? | frud wrote: | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1798709/ | leodriesch wrote: | It's a movie about a humanlike personal AI companion. | | https://m.imdb.com/title/tt1798709/ | fikama wrote: | I see a great opportunity for chat interfaces like this one | among younger audience. Every one knows how chat works, they | are everywhere. And file systems or even tags are not so | ubiquitously understood. | ge96 wrote: | Would be curious if a study was done on this form of | interaction after Siri/Alexa became big. | theK wrote: | I worked on a project like this. The biggest challenge we had was | finding ux patterns that keep returning the user to interact with | the app and fill context gaps as it becomes convenient. | | I wish those guys lots of luck but I'm not signing up. | Excessively logging my life on somebody else's computer is not on | my key interests any more. | gizajob wrote: | "Eventually, Mei decides she's had enough of Dot interfering in | every aspect of her life, uninstalls Dot, and goes about her | business as usual, determined to interact with reality in a more | wholehearted way." | morelisp wrote: | If you get 'em while they're young, they won't even know | there's an alternative. | hoosieree wrote: | see: Jexi | | https://www.imdb.com/title/tt9354944/ | ge96 wrote: | Her 2013 | | "Do you mind if I look through your hard drive?" | | "Umm... okay" | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GV01B5kVsC0 (3:35) | | I do like this part a lot, as a loner guy but I cannot trust | something I didn't make (tinfoil hat guy digs silica by hand) | teaearlgraycold wrote: | It could work well for business use cases. Basically a junior | PM in software form. | annoyingnoob wrote: | "A year later, Mei is notified that new.computer was hacked and | all of Mei's very personal data has been dumped on pastebin." | leodriesch wrote: | Their privacy policy lists OpenAI as one of their partners for | data processing, which indicates that this is happening not on | your device, and data is also shared with third parties. | | For me this is the main counterargument against apps like these. | I want to feel free to post any information into this without | thinking about who may read or use it. | | Local is the only way to go for software like this in my opinion. | thomashop wrote: | They say in their about page: | | "We will never monetize your data. We will never monetize your | attention. And we believe that the only way we can build | towards the future we envision is through the continuous | reinforcement of mutual trust and respect. Currently, we | leverage best-in-class cloud-hosted models, including ones from | OpenAI, Anthropic, and a selection of open-source options. Over | time, we plan to reduce external dependence and localize | computing to run on-device." | NetOpWibby wrote: | Sounds like reverse-engineering to me | Veserv wrote: | Great, then they should just put their promise into a legally | binding irrevocable clause in their terms of service and also | legally guarantee that their entire business will shut down | if they violate it. They are never going to do it anyways, so | no harm in enforcing what they are never going to do. | JohnFen wrote: | And what reason does anyone have to put any faith in that? | And their service providers (OpenAI, etc.) may not be on the | same page as them. | thomashop wrote: | I'm not saying I would put any faith in it. The company | could start genuinely believing those values but the values | of a company change over time with more people investing. | sillywalk wrote: | How _do_ they intend to make money? | notpachet wrote: | "After the untimely passing of her oil tycoon father, Mei | finds herself with more money than she knows what to do | with. Dot helpfully suggests transferring a few hundred | thousand dollars to New Computer as a thank you for Dot's | continued existence." | sillywalk wrote: | "... or else." | TaylorAlexander wrote: | Yeah reading this web page I just keep thinking "Mei has | trusted a cloud based service to be her personal confidant for | all aspects of her life including text and documents. This will | end poorly for Mei." | crooked-v wrote: | That also means it's useless for interacting with your life if | your life happens to include anything above a PG-13 rating, | what with how cloyingly pearl-clutching the OpenAI offerings | are about sex or violence. | colesantiago wrote: | So is this another GPT-4 wrapper? | NetOpWibby wrote: | Yes | benatkin wrote: | It's GPT-4 meets rewind.ai | sillywalk wrote: | "Dot is, at its most simple, an app you chat with on iOS. You can | send it words, voice memos, pictures, PDFs, and it's thrilled to | search the web for you, too. Communicating through written text | (Dot's voice is coming next year)" [0]. | | It looks quite "ambitious"[1]: | | - Automated File Management: Dot creates, organizes, and | retrieves both structured and unstructured information. | | - Adaptive Intelligence: It learns from patterns in your | behavior, plus any guidance you decide to share with it | | - Internet Browsing: It has access to up-to-date information (and | eventually, tools and services) | | - Contextual Multimodal Understanding: It interprets text, audio, | visuals, and links, informed by the context it already has on you | | - Self-Programming: Dot proactively writes and stores routines, | anticipating your future needs | | - Personalized Display and Retrieval: It transforms information | into the most compelling format for each user | | - Conceptual Synthesis: It doesn't just store information -- it | connects the dots between topics, ideas, and themes in your life | | - Theory of Mind: Dot synthesizes a deeper understanding of your | motivations and goals, while reflecting on how it can best help | you to achieve them. | | [0] https://www.fastcompany.com/90975882/meet-dot-an-ai- | companio... | | [1] https://new.computer/about | refulgentis wrote: | I'm a bit perturbed by the, uh, inflation here. Looks like a | product manager wishlist for a team of 1000 over 7 years | floren wrote: | Most of those bullets are "we are using a LLM with some basic | LLM-interfacing techniques" | og_kalu wrote: | Not really. Putting this all together is ambitious but | individually, they're all things that have been realized to | some degree. | sillywalk wrote: | Or a VC pitch. | cabirum wrote: | In a year, Dot app is discontinued and you lose everything. | azinman2 wrote: | If new technology and products don't have a chance for optimism | on HN, where do they? | mrkeen wrote: | The kind of tech that underpins this gets a pretty good | reception here. | | But this page looks slick to a fault. The user story approach | feels pandering and I lose interest fairly quickly. Is this | closed source? IOS only? I see a waitlist - Why don't they | want a general audience to see it? | karaterobot wrote: | What can I do with this app that I couldn't do without it? It's | just weird to me to turn over such mundane tasks as saving a | recipe or looking at my school's listing of singing clubs over to | an AI assistant. There may (or, historically, may _not_ ) be | efficiencies to keeping my entire life in an app, but what's the | new thing I can do as a result of this? Keep in mind that it has | to be cooler than the lifetime cost of the app plus the loss of | privacy (which may be variable, granted). | annoyingnoob wrote: | > It's just weird to me to turn over such mundane tasks as | saving a recipe or looking at my school's listing of singing | clubs over to an AI assistant. | | I understood that the app will deeply profile you and advertise | to you. Ads, now from whatever AI 'thinks' about your life! | asadm wrote: | I wonder how does it perform on things long-before (outside gpt | context). Do they just do the normal tricks like vector db? | kmoser wrote: | I'm guessing it'll hallucinate things about you that it doesn't | know. This might be a mixed blessing: it could introduce you to | things you weren't aware of, but it could also be annoyingly | inaccurate. | asadm wrote: | well humans also hallucinate or assume things they dont know | or on how they remember it so that's alright. | jamesmcintyre wrote: | I immediately recognized this as either inspired from or actually | from the same creators of the mercuryos concept | https://www.mercuryos.com/. Turns out it's the latter. | | I love the Mercury OS concept and think it's design both | elegantly and sort of subversively packs a myriad of potentially | breakthrough ideas. | | I have been stewing with ideas around the same vision for years. | The idea of a new type of UI where the UI seams to dematerialize, | where you directly manipulate the object in your current context | (like multi-touch's direct manipulation but at a higher layer of | abstraction powered by deep api integrations, intelligent self- | assembling relational graphs, and of course ai). For over a | decade I've had this thought "the data becomes the UI" like an | emergent UI from whatever given data, task or context you are | currently in. When I came across the mercuryos concept I | immediately smiled. | | Conceptually, strategically and technically there are so many | challenges to introducing such a new ux paradigm but I'm very | happy to see the mercuryos concept has seemed to evolve to New | Computer's Dot and I wish them the best! | | For those immediately turning to negative sentiment based on | privacy or "it's just a gpt4 wrapper" I can see why that could be | the knee-jerk reaction but I wouldn't underestimate a sturdy | design-philosophy approach like this one. I'd go as far as to | make comparisons to Next Computer's NextStepOS. NextStep | introduced so many groundbreaking UX concepts and to a large | extent I think their personal computing contemporaries | underestimated what potential it packed. And, yes, I know the | business model and many other factors played into an inevitable | doom for Next Computer but there's belief that Steve Jobs may | have never intended for Next to become a dominant computing | player and instead knew it'd be an irresistible acquisition | target in a latent space of UX innovation. It's possible he saw | the next evolution of personal computing UX and hedged his bet on | not compromising on it. Yet another comparison could be that | NextStepOS needed more cpu, graphics and connectivity power to | truly display it's heightened level of UX much in the same way | something like Dot or mercuryOS would inherently need to leverage | cutting-edge computing to truly enable it's vision (obviously | LLM's, Vector DB's, etc). | | Ok, I'm done, lol. | nix0n wrote: | This could be the first ten minutes of a Black Mirror episode. | gary_0 wrote: | We're living the first ten minutes of a Black Mirror episode. | kashunstva wrote: | > Dot remembers Mei's interest in singing and proactively sends | her suggestions for music clubs at school. | | Imagine having so little agency and motivation within your own | existence on this earth that you need an app to remind of what | you once found life--affirming. | chalsprhebaodu wrote: | Yeah, imagine how they feel. | IanCal wrote: | That's not what that says though, it's not reminding them of | loving singing, it's finding clubs. It's a proactive search. | | It'd be like a friend saying "oh hey I know you like singing, I | spotted these clubs you might like". | brandonmenc wrote: | Looks great! | | Too bad I will never ever ever use something like this if I can't | local host. | CodeWriter23 wrote: | "Mei, I need you to come to where I am" <cue dystopian Ai-invites | you over ending> | angoragoats wrote: | This is the most likely-to-be-Sherlocked[1] thing I've seen in a | while. | | And when Apple does it, the processing will be done on-device. | | [1] https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=sherlocked | sillywalk wrote: | I remember Sherlock... | | Looks like Apple already has already been working on it with | their Journal App (in Beta now). [0] | | [0] https://beebom.com/journal-app-iphone/ | aroman wrote: | Same could have been said of Workflow -- which Apple acquired | and rebranded as a first-party app. | micromacrofoot wrote: | acquisition doesn't really count as sherlocking, it's usually | implementing an idea from an existing app without any money | being exchanged | | a more recent example this was F.lux, which Apple implemented | as "Night Shift" | og_kalu wrote: | This is the kind of thing where adoption and user mass matters | a great deal. If thois is successful and apple are too slow to | roll out something like this, don't expect a lot of users to | "just switch" out of what they've invested a great deal of | personal data and routine into. It'd have to be something even | deeper, like OS level integration. | sofaygo wrote: | Their UI is incredibly elegant | wargames wrote: | FYI to the website designer: on desktop, this website does not | have a scrollbar. In addition to that being an accessibility | issue, I closed the website after I got tired of paging and/or | using the scroll wheel. | g-b-r wrote: | Are they Chinese? | jmrm wrote: | This is really interesting not just as an app per se, but as a | new human-machine interface. | | This should be great as a team working tool, where you can ask if | something is done, how were done, what parts are missing, | retrieve what is done, etc. | | Integrating this in a ecosystem like Google Apps, Office 365, or | similar would be great in order to being able to access that | information inserted in other ways, with the pluses of email, | calendar, and sync services. | al_borland wrote: | I'm not sure why someone would want to trust an AI chat startup | with holding onto grandma's special recipe. 95% of these AI | startups are not going to exist in 5 years as the market sorts | out how AI is used and which companies win and lose. None of the | offerings coming out right now should be used for data archival | of any kind. Anything put into these AI chat bots should be | considered throw away. | tnolet wrote: | "2,5 years later, Mei receives an email from Dot's CEO that Dot | will be 'joining forces' with Salesforce as their 'incredible | journey' comes to an end." | tnolet wrote: | "Mei ask for a full dump of her data. Dot responds 'Sorry, I | can't do that Dave, I mean Mei'". | romwell wrote: | _" Mei asks where has the scrollbar gone on the desktop version | of the website. Dot responds, `What scrollbar?`. Mei promptly | closes the page and never returns"._ | shanelleroman wrote: | Looks cool! I've been using & contributing to Lightrail | (https://github.com/lightrail-ai/lightrail). It's more dev- | focused but hopefully, it's developing in a similar direction | (long-term memory/context, integrations, etc) while still being | local-first / OSS. I definitely think we're heading for a future | where persistent AI assistants play a big role, and I'm really | hoping the ones that win out are more open & private! | benhurmarcel wrote: | It kind of reminds me of https://mymind.com/ ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-11-01 23:00 UTC)