[HN Gopher] YouTuber Kitboga trapped 200 scammers in an Impossib... ___________________________________________________________________ YouTuber Kitboga trapped 200 scammers in an Impossible Maze [video] Author : donpott Score : 466 points Date : 2023-11-03 15:38 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.youtube.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.youtube.com) | FirmwareBurner wrote: | _" Why did you redeem it?!"_ | | Kitboga is a youtube national treasure. | simlevesque wrote: | It's a satisfying feeling when good trolling is done for a good | purpose. | dylan604 wrote: | there are certain phrases that when i read them, i hear the | voice of specific people saying them in specific ways. | typically this is movie phrases, but "why did you do | that?!?!?!" from one of the scammers is now in my head. | cuddlyogre wrote: | I know so many foreign curse words thanks to him. | pests wrote: | His (old?) Google Play system was great. The digit at a | specific location indicated to the fake Google Play store how | much the redemption was worth. | lapetitejort wrote: | The twist at the end is wonderful in so many ways. Kitboga, by | complete happenstance, directly saves someone from a prolonged | scam. Not only that, but he may have inadvertently stumbled upon | a new technique to help out victims. Trick the scammers into | giving their victims Kitboga's number so he can help them | directly. I am excited for his future endeavors. | chrisjc wrote: | This situation didn't make any sense to me. Wasn't Kitboga and | his team playing the part of the party being scammed? What did | this lady have to do with bitcoin receipt/qr-code? | graywh wrote: | this wasn't the usual "pretend to be a victim" bit | lapetitejort wrote: | They are playing the part of the scammed. and the part of the | support group helping the scammer. Kitboga got "scammed", | says he went to an ATM, deposited money, and got a receipt | with a QR code. The code leads to Kitboga's website and | telephone service. How an innocent lady got his number isn't | clear. Maybe the scammers switched receipts on accident, got | frustrated, and told the lady to deal with customer service | herself. | throwawaymaths wrote: | The scammers for some reason gave the victim kitbogas number. | I don't know why. I think kitboga is confused too. | zerf wrote: | The scammers were in full belief that Kitboga's | cryptocurrency transfer service was legitimate. The scammers | had a second victim who was unable to transfer her | cryptocurrency to the scammers. The scammers instructed the | victim to contact both Kraken as well as Kitboga's service to | help complete her bitcoin transfer. | | The remaining mystery for me is how the second victim was | able to repeat Kitboga's email address to Kraken support. | It's possible that the fake transfer site included this email | address somewhere on the page. | whiterock wrote: | hilarious. | dustedcodes wrote: | This is one of the best paybacks I've seen to date. Marvellous, | there's nothing dodgy or nasty about it, just breaking a scammers | spirit in the most comical way. Well done! | flerchin wrote: | It's really funny, but I can't tell how he funneled in scammers | only. Seems just as likely he just has poor people. | jstanley wrote: | The only way to receive a gift card for this website is by | attempting to scam him. | phantomwhiskers wrote: | He only gives scammers the QR code that leads into his | gauntlet. Normal people shouldn't be stumbling into this, as it | requires a fake QR code from a fake Bitcoin ATM receipt. This | also lures the scammers in as they believe they will receive | (someone else's) Bitcoin. | spywaregorilla wrote: | but if you had a sample qr code (or even just the basic url?) | you could start trolling innocents, no? | lapetitejort wrote: | Design it well and innocents can be identified quickly and | directed to real people who can help them out, as what | happened in this video at the end. | dylan604 wrote: | sure, but you won't be scamming them, so it's all in fun | troll spirit. frankly, i've met some asshats in the real | world that i wouldn't mind pulling pranks like this on. | jabroni_salad wrote: | What are the stakes? It's a website with weird captchas and | a phone robot that puts you on hold, not a landmine. | csours wrote: | Probably people he scambusted, or his associates have | scambusted. | t-writescode wrote: | I understand your concern. kitboga goes to great lengths to | ensure only scammers are harmed by his anti-scam tactics; and, | while it may be theoretically possible that a scammer has | brought in an unassuming victim to do this work for him, the | odds are very low, sufficient that it is reasonable to believe | it doesn't happen, or is caught fast. | erikerikson wrote: | > has poor people | | With $1M+ wallets? I do not think poor means what you think it | means. Granted, his mention of that was nearer to the end of | the video. | modeless wrote: | Is this one as good as the impossible password game one? It was | genius. https://youtu.be/knhQ2f8anT8 | nogridbag wrote: | That's definitely one of my favorites. But the video that made | me laugh out loud the most was his collab with a cake designer: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZpkdrm-zGA | Wissenschafter wrote: | I always wonder if Kitboga was influenced by comedian Phil | Hendrie. I grew up listening to Phil on the radio and they have | very similar styles. Love it, hilarious. | starik36 wrote: | His first ever show on KFI with the fake station manager was | the most confusing time in my life. | function_seven wrote: | I delivered pizzas back when Phil was on KFI. There were _so_ | many late deliveries because I just couldn't get out of my | car until a commercial break. | | RC Collins, Bud from Ojai, Margaret Gray, Bobbie Dooley, etc. | All hilarious. | sva_ wrote: | The call hold line maze was great | mschuster91 wrote: | While I prefer Scammer Payback, this is f...ing awesome. A job | well done. | IngvarLynn wrote: | It could've been funny, but every second of this video reminds me | of my own experiences of dealing with the government services. | hn_throwaway_99 wrote: | I love one of the top comments on the video: | | > I love how Kit has evolved over the years to find out the | best way of making scammers go crazy is to treat them basically | the same way Comcast treats their customers. | joedevon wrote: | hahahahaha | vsviridov wrote: | IMO this is way better than what the other scambaiter Pierogi did | recently. I'm refering to this video: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUHFpfVPUYc | | In the beginning it seems okay, have a bunch of people pretend to | be victims and waste scammers time, but later on with starting to | deploy malware and zero-days, spying on people with their web | cam... Just because scammers break the law doesn't mean we have | to stoop to their level. Overall left a bad taste in my mouth. It | had a strong smell of "ends justify the means" mentality and this | is know to turn to s*t every time. | 3seashells wrote: | Why use people? All it takes Is chatgpt? | hrdwdmrbl wrote: | No sympathy for those scum. If it was your low-income parents | being scammed of their life savings, you wouldn't either. No | one is stopping these criminals. There is no legal system to | pursue them. They operate largely outside of any repercussions. | No sympathy for those scum. | nyanpasu64 wrote: | Meanwhile YouTube's first video recommendation is | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s23XR8JMKtA where Kitboga | himself installs malware on a scammer's machine. | houli wrote: | That's not what happens. He runs his own fake ransomware on | his own virtual machine while they are remotely viewing it. | chairhairair wrote: | Imagine thinking surveillance is inherently evil. | | Not everything is a slippery slope, it turns out. It's ok to go | outside with your eyes open still. | spywaregorilla wrote: | How many nuts are in this picture is the dystopia I fear | dylan604 wrote: | is the rodent male or female or gender fluid? | oktwtf wrote: | Classic scambaiting, reminds me of 419 Eater. | binarymax wrote: | Is this the guy who got a scammer to carve a wooden keyboard? | Legendary | oktwtf wrote: | 419 Eater was a place to show-off, coordinate, discuss | tactics, etc. Topic: Scambaiting | | I believe it's origins were going directly after the scammers | behind an advance-fee scam, a.k.a. the "Nigerian prince | scam". 419 is in reference to some criminal code. | at-fates-hands wrote: | You are correct: | | _The name 419 comes from "419 fraud", another name for | advance fee fraud, and itself derived from the relevant | section of the Nigerian criminal code._ | klyrs wrote: | https://www.419eater.com/html/john_boko.htm | | This looks like the "scambaiter" actually scammed an artist | into making some pretty sweet art under the guise of a | scolarship. Am I missing something, or is this actual fraud? | yorwba wrote: | If you read all the way to the end: | | >> I was also able to discover the name and contact details | of John's artist and managed to contact him to confirm he | had indeed been paid for his work, although he wouldn't | tell me how much he was paid! | | But yeah, John got scammed. | 29athrowaway wrote: | The "do not redeem" video is the Kitboga's gift to humanity. | | Scamming old people out of their retirement is the worst thing | someone can do. I have no empathy for those scammers. | SirMaster wrote: | I thought a lot of them don't even know they are running scams, | and that is all coming down from the top. | | They are barely paid phone workers just doing scripts and doing | what they are told just so they can feed their families. | packetslave wrote: | "doing what they are told" is not an excuse if what you're | being told to do is evil. | reidjs wrote: | That is the sad reality of this. Most the scammers would | probably prefer to work a legitimate job, but circumstances | have forced them into this. I don't think most of them | willingly choose to rip off people, but given the choice | between stealing from a stranger, painlessly, or having their | children starve, we'd all make the same choice. | | That doesn't make it OK, but that is probably how they | justify stealing other people's money. | 29athrowaway wrote: | They are forced to become criminals and scam old people. | Yeah sure. | jstarfish wrote: | Don't bring white guilt into this. Desperation doesn't excuse | depravity, nor should it. | | On the other end of the phone call are people being forced | into the same position of desperation through deception. | That's their reward for a lifetime of presumably- _honest_ | work. | | The noble savages aren't that dumb either. These aren't | credit default swaps so abstracted from the underlying assets | that the product's toxicity is unrecognizable at the nth | degree. They're directly manipulating people into draining | their accounts. At some level, something about it should feel | off. | 29athrowaway wrote: | White guilt? noble savages? | | What are you talking about? | | Expressing your thoughts through racial stereotypes makes | you look with a person with poor judgment and no common | sense. | 29athrowaway wrote: | It is crime. | | And many of those scammers make a lot of money, they operate | under commisions and bonuses, according to videos from | hackers that break into their systems and steal their data. | singleshot_ wrote: | That's correct. Their employers should be held liable, | squeezed for every last nickel, and forced to shut down | permanently. That the employees chose their criminal | employment unwisely or unwittingly is regrettable. | burnerburnson wrote: | Only on HackerNews could I find some idiot trying to drum up | sympathy for phone scammers. | 29athrowaway wrote: | A 20 year old failed social engineer scamming a 80 year old | retired American veteran requires all our empathy. | nerdo wrote: | What a 1960's psych experiment would look like in 2023. | Submitting to the authority of the QR code/877 number instead of | white lab coat. | TacticalCoder wrote: | I love Kitboda's videos. The one thing that strikes me all the | time is how arrogant, smug, full of themselves these scammers | always sound. They do profoundly believe they're oh-so- | intelligent and don't hesitate to make fun of the old people they | (think they) are speaking to. | | Despicable scum of this earth. | | Thanks to Kitboga for fighting the good fight and it's great to | see banks and crypto-exchanges immediately freezing the accounts | reported by Kitboga. | williamcotton wrote: | Arrogant and smug to one, a _confident man_ to another! | netsharc wrote: | In regards to the arrogance... I imagine they have to be like | that in order to be able to sleep at night, they justify the | scamming by saying (mostly to themselves) things like the West | stole from the developing countries, so this is them stealing | back, and they have to believe the victims deserve it so they | can, I repeat, sleep at night. Another justification might be | "Look at this stupid moron, I won't feel bad stealing from them | because someone would inevitably do, since they're so dumb!", | i.e. they have to believe the victims are dumb in order to | convince themselves of the previous sentence. | | Maybe it's a chicken and egg issue though, maybe only scumbag | jerkoffs are attracted to this kind of scam-call-center work. | Then again maybe most humans are easily manipulable that they | go into such a call-center being a decent person and enter into | a Stanford Prison Experiment situation... | PH95VuimJjqBqy wrote: | They scam many many people all day every day, why wouldn't | they get arrogant about it? | | your explanation seems overly complicated. | jwilber wrote: | I think they're speculating about the sort of person who is | drawn to that sort of job, how they justify that line of | work, etc. | lstamour wrote: | The Stanford Prison Experiment reveals a lot about decent | people being easily manipulated - and by that I mean the | whole thing has since been revealed as fraudulent: | https://www.vox.com/2018/6/13/17449118/stanford-prison- | exper... | hattmall wrote: | Were these studies never replicated? | coryfklein wrote: | They were not. The Stanford Prison Experiment used to be | a case study on people following orders and fulfilling | assigned roles, and now it's the case study for the | problem of the replication crisis. | mensetmanusman wrote: | Didn't they ban attempts to replicate because of | violence? | JaDogg wrote: | Yes, they definitely believe the West stole their money. This | is what you hear every day from government propaganda (based | on personal experience; refer to my other comment on the | original post). Breaking out of propaganda is not a simple | task for any individual. While the West may have colonized | these countries in the past, it is the government and | corruption that are currently responsible for the theft. | Moreover, people from these countries are exposed to scams | from as early as 5-10 years old. Eventually, this exposure | leads to normalization, I believe. | | As a side note, I believe one of the worst outcomes of | colonization is that these countries lost their monarchies | and lacked a natural progression to diplomacy. The only way | for these countries to develop and reduce corruption is | through educated youth engaging in politics and joining | political parties to a degree where they dilute corruption, | similar to how acid is diluted. | monadINtop wrote: | > I believe one of the worst outcomes of colonization is | that these countries lost their monarchies and lacked a | natural progression to diplomacy | | I think this is a very loaded and fraught perspective that | ignores a large amount of context. | | Colonial powers generally co-opt local heirarchies and | utilise the pre-existing state machinery to expediate the | process of resource extraction and pacification since doing | it from scratch is often far to costly prone to | instability. In many cases this may inflame pre-existing | class confict and further entrench social division. It is | rarely the case that pre-colonial power structures simply | just vanish and are replaced by the colonial force, and | furthermore they don't simply vanish post-colonisation | leaving behind a template-less society. | | Ex-colonies don't exist in a vacuum. Every society on the | face of the earth is embedded in a complex global web of | economic and political influence. Post-colonial nations can | still be implicitly, and sometimes covertly, subjugated | through asymmetric trade agreements, power projection, and | a whole range of other processes. It is naive to assign | blame of a corrupt or floundering region to a simple moral | decay in an isolated system of people that just never | figured out how to govern themselves. The answer is found | when one instead considers the given region's place in the | continuum of economic and historic processes that are far | too complex to simplify into an independent narrative. | | And finally, how does a monarchy naturally progress to | "diplomacy"? To my knowledge there is no single theory that | describes a universal archetype of a how a given human | society is supposed to "naturally" develop. Even in western | countries, the process of economic development from a | feudal mode of production to the current capitalist | parliamentary-democracy, is an extremely complicated and | poorly understood topic that covers an area of research far | larger than the scope any single historian or political | theorist. Everything we see indicates that there is | absolutely no fixed model of social development, especially | not one that isn't contigent on an unimaginable number of | nonlinear factors. I think it's reasonable to say that the | development of any given society is completely unique to | itself, and is the result of it's own unique position in | relation to the outside world, and to history. | JaDogg wrote: | [delayed] | rickreynoldssf wrote: | No, 99.9% of them are just scum of the earth criminals. They | don't give a shit about who they're scamming. | ge96 wrote: | Jim Browning (like a kitboga) too | jrace wrote: | I have taken quite the disadian for these scanners after the | took advantage of my aunt. | | Since then when I get calls I keep them on the line to stope | them from at least scamming one other person. | | I have had three on long enough to actually answer the question | I ask | | "Why would you scam a poor little old lady?" | | All three answered the same: | | "You people in the west are rich and don't deserve it." | pixl97 wrote: | >The one thing that strikes me all the time is how arrogant, | smug, full of themselves these scammers always sound. | | You're reversing causation... Humans as a whole are more apt to | follow people that _sound_ confident. Therefore as a scammer, | if you want to boost your success rate you need to sound | confident. The scammer never wants you to doubt their ability, | but they want you to constantly doubt your own. | wnevets wrote: | Scammers vs Impossible Password Game [1] is also great to watch. | | [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knhQ2f8anT8 | nonrandomstring wrote: | Put the fire out! You murdered the chicken!! Unbelievable. I | almost laughed up a lung. | quux wrote: | Amazing | no_time wrote: | This is staged right? Right?? | CursedUrn wrote: | So this is real? I always presumed the person he's talking to in | these videos was just a friend/colleague playing the part. Some | of the stuff he does to them seems like it would violate | international hacking laws or something. | lupire wrote: | There are no "international hacking laws". That's why all these | scammers operate with impunity. | CursedUrn wrote: | I meant it would violate the laws in the victim's country. | There are certainly laws against installing malware on | someone else's machine in lots of countries. | gnicholas wrote: | Can someone explain how the scammers are pulled in in the first | place? That is, what's the 'funnel' for this? | | I get that this is amusing and a good way to waste scammers' | time, but where did he originally find the scammers? | teaearlgraycold wrote: | They have public phone numbers they send out in spam email | campaigns. | iris2004 wrote: | > Can someone explain how the scammers are pulled in in the | first place? That is, what's the 'funnel' for this? | | Viewers send in spam emails. They also look for ads on Facebook | and other Ad networks that pretend to be virus pop-ups or bank | alerts. | | After they engage with a scammer, they trick the scammer into | thinking the victim has lodged money in a bitcoin ATM. However | the receipt is fake and funnels them to the Gauntlet (the | endless phone system and verification process). | abetusk wrote: | So, I'm not sure but I think what's going on is that a scammer | calls and asks the "victim" (in this case, Kitboga) to transfer | funds into one of their Bitcoin wallet addresses. This can be | done via a Bitcoin ATM which will then print out a receipt | which the scammer asks the victim for a picture of (see [0]). | | As Kitboga says, the scam normally has to end at this point | because the scammer can easily verify whether the receipt is | fake or not. So, instead, Kitboga and his team created a fake | receipt that takes the scammer to the web and call center | labyrinth, promising them they can redeem the Bitcoin at the | end. | | Third party Bitcoin management entities are kind of common now, | I guess, so this doesn't raise any big red flags? | | [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWzz3NeDz3E&t=150s | KallDrexx wrote: | Why would victims be calling in on the scammer's behalf then? | I would assume that would only happen if a real victim | somehow has a receipt that ties into Kitboga's fake system | right? | chrisjc wrote: | I think you have the right idea. And that's what threw me | off at the end. How did this lady (as well as the others he | mentioned) get pulled in to the mix? | | Perhaps the scammer convinced this lady to handle the call | for him since it was taking hours/days of his time. If she | was gullible (no disrespect) enough to be scammed for 6 | years, she could be easily manipulated into doing their | tedious work. | dvaletin wrote: | They don'w own this bitcoin wallet of course. They need | receipt to attribute payment to them and get comission. They | verify transaction and get into the loop. | jabroni_salad wrote: | He calls in to fake hotlines that you can find in google | searches and lets them mess around with a virtual machine. When | it's time to pay for the "services," he furnishes them with a | fake gift card or bitcoin QR code. The scammer now wants to | mess around with this fake institution because they think | there's a bitcoin at the other end side of the maze. | | Also, once you call in a time or two you are now a proven easy | mark and they will sell your number to other scam ops as a | premium lead. Just like real sales! | cedws wrote: | If you browse the Internet without an ad blocker for a while | you'll find all sorts. | BillSaysThis wrote: | This. Is. Awesome! | EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK wrote: | You are all laughing, but I was just presented with an impossible | captcha trying to login into my OpenAI account, that I pay | $20/month for. To solve the captcha, I need to click the puzzle | 80 (!) times, and if I make a mistake, I should start everything | anew. That's totally not funny. Had to cancel the subscription. | Anyway, Phind is faster and better quality. | dave1010uk wrote: | What OS and browser are you using? Give me a couple of minutes | and I'll get ChatGPT to write aa script that does it for you. | gryn wrote: | I don't know if you're being satiric about it but I found | your reply hilarious. | | maybe the captcha was made with chatGPT to begin with. | | AIs creating jobs for AIs to keep (server) employment at 100% | switchbak wrote: | And that's the real reason we need fusion power. To power | all the incredibly dumb shit that we layer on top of other | layers of dumb. | | If only we had an AI that could clean all of that up for | us. Sadly, I'm only half joking. I need a beer. | blt wrote: | There is no training data ;) | EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK wrote: | Then they will brick my Windows laptop and throw me in jail | for Illegal Captcha Circumvention and Resisting Verification! | TeMPOraL wrote: | Oh, you got the ICCRV popup? Don't worry - this usually | means you forgot to drink the verification can. So drink | the verification can, and _then_ refresh the page, in this | order. | mensetmanusman wrote: | If you have multiple services that are suspicious of your CC | transactions, someone might be trying to rob you. | EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK wrote: | Nope, CC is not in question this time. Captcha is before the | password. Wonder if there is a youtube video somewhere We | Made That sucker Solve 80-click Captcha! | boneitis wrote: | This was my first thought. Commenters here are thoroughly | entertained, but all I see are the efforts of people that mold | the internet experience into what I have to deal with on a | daily basis. They would make great additions to AI and CAPTCHA | teams. /snark | | It's pretty wild that my $20 subscription earns me a long | string of puzzles. Sometimes I am forced to solve so many of | the very-difficult-to-solve variety that I just give up and | hope that, on another day, they only give me a couple. | | I subscribed in the hopes that the utility of it would be | immediate and without the SEO cesspool, but ultimately, I'm | still losing that time (and paying for the privilege of) | providing free labor for model training. | Wissenschafter wrote: | I've had GPT pro since it was first available and have not | once had to do a CAPTCHA to use it, first time I'm hearing | about this actually. | EVa5I7bHFq9mnYK wrote: | Congrats, you are a good person with high social rating, | keep at it! | pixl97 wrote: | I mean, probably true... or at least a person with a high | IP address rating. | | This said, these types of gates exist everywhere online | and off. Live in a nice neighborhood and you can go pick | up your own Tide detergent right off the shelf. Live near | a 'bad' (high theft) neighborhood and you'll ask a staff | member to go unlock it for you before you can take it off | the shelf. Even things with paid memberships like Sams | club I've went to stores that check you match up with the | membership ID you're bringing in. | | OP doesn't have to give them business, but grabbing his | pearls and acting shocked is also the appearance of | someone that has not have to live around any kind of | economically depressed area at all. | capableweb wrote: | It's country dependent. When I've been around in Europe, I | barely see it. As soon as I go to South America, captchas | everywhere. | alexey-salmin wrote: | > It's pretty wild that my $20 subscription earns me a long | string of puzzles. | | Well that GPT5 isn't gonna train itself | asddubs wrote: | Makes me think of this video: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVFYFr4Vy8I | DrawTR wrote: | Makes me think of this one: https://youtu.be/WqnXp6Saa8Y | dalmo3 wrote: | I'm also cancelling my Proton VPN subscription after being | captcha-ed for minutes IN THE DESKTOP APP. | fmx wrote: | Yeah, as hilarious as this is _when it happens to a bad guy_ | the really sad aspect of it, for me, is that their customer | service experience is not _so_ abnormal. If it were, most would | immediately identify it as fake. Like, counting the numbers of | nuts in a photo is _a bit_ much, but we are so used to horrible | CAPTHAs now that it 's _just_ plausible. Same with the phone | menu, etc. | alpaca128 wrote: | They didn't even give me the chance to really try it. Less than | 10 prompts over half a week and every response is "we have | detected suspicious activity on your system, try again later". | Doesn't seem to be a rare problem, subscription or not. | HansHamster wrote: | Reminds me of my experience with GCP... "here are 300 bucks | of credit so you can try out absolutely nothing interesting | because we set all relevant quotas to 0. Good luck trying to | get any support, but if you really want, you can try to | contact our business sales teams for very serious businesses | that will just ignore you" | S201 wrote: | The zero API quota on GCP hits close to home for me too. | Last year I wanted to write a little script that would use | the YouTube API to find video URLs from a particular | channel. The details on it aren't important; it was | something I would only use locally for personal purposes | and did a single API call per day. | | After wondering why it kept returning a 401 I finally | figured out that the API quota was set to zero out of the | box and that I had to fill out some form with a bunch of | ridiculous questions like "what will be the impact to your | business if your quota is not increased?" Uh, I won't be | able to use the API at all because it's currently zero? | | The end result was that it took about two weeks of back and | forth with Google Support trying to make them understand | what I was using the API for before they finally relented | and increased the API quota to a non-zero value. | | I get that Google is probably somewhat protective of the | YouTube API and I'm just some Joe Blow looking to query it | for non-revenue purposes, but if I were a business it would | have been an insanely terrible experience to get set up | with a third-party API. | | Compared to every quota increase request on AWS which is | either self-serve or something a support ticket handles in | a few hours typically. | 015a wrote: | I cancelled my ChatGPT+ subscription only because of their | sign-in and captcha hell. | michael_vo wrote: | There should be a software product that protects our elderly by | watching their bank accounts and listens to their phone calls. | | It's so clearly a scam. | HappyTortoise wrote: | Tbf the bank thing is already a thing in a very limited | capacity, but at some point the scammers figure out a bypass. | The phone call thing is interesting but I wouldn't want an AI | having all of my phone calls and it'll be hard to convince | people to use it since everyone thinks they won't be scammed - | better spend that time educating about scams instead. It'll | also be much easier to bypass than the bank detection thing as | a scammer can easily get access to the product. | hiatus wrote: | If you're worried about elderly parents spending all of their | money and they are accepting of your help, there's a few things | you can do. | | Freeze their credit. Open a new bank account that will be their | spending money, transfer money into it on a schedule. Set up | regular bills on autopay so they get out of the habit of | mailing checks (lots of mail gets sent to elderly ppl making it | seem like it's gov and a response is required). Set up MDM on | their phones and computers. Get them a low limit credit card. | | You don't have to do it all. Credit freeze, MDM, and bill pay | are probably the biggest and easiest to get consent to. | libele wrote: | or just do what my parents did: while the old folks are at | their most vulnerable, use your cute children to gain their | confidence and trick them into signing all of their assets | over to you. take advantage of struggling family members by | writing them out of the inheritance that was intended for the | whole family. once the new will has been signed and notorized | you can gradually taper off nursing home visits, sit back and | wait for them to die. | corbezzoli wrote: | For better or for worse, the category of "software that | silently listens in on calls" is non-existent due to OS | limitations. Generally sounds like a lot of work and | computation for a very rare situation. | | Lowtech solutions would just be taking the (bank) key away from | the elders, just like they'd hide my grandpa's literal car keys | when he was 70 with dementia. | rossdavidh wrote: | Can these people actually be this stupid? I am having a hard time | believing it. I would expect scammers to be more aware of the | possibility of deceitful behavior by others. Incredible if true, | but hard to believe... | marginalia_nu wrote: | This is basically what surfing the web with a bad IP reputation | is like. Captcha upon captcha. | | It's also basically what dealing with a fin tech startup is | like, especially in the crypto adjacent space. Getting a hold | of a person is basically impossible. | shortrounddev2 wrote: | If they were that smart, they would have real jobs | pixl97 wrote: | Eh, I do support work and work with a lot of large | multinationals... being smart is not required it seems. And | those are people with legit job titles. | themagician wrote: | It depends. A lot of these scammers are extremely desperate. | Some are forced into it. For others it's just an office job | like any other. | | Some firms actually do both legitimate support/customer service | work and scamming side by side. I've called legit companies | support lines before and the person picking up starts off doing | some scam and them I'm like, "I thought this was Brand X," and | they switch, "Oh yes, sorry about that. What was your order | number?" That's how bad it's gotten. | corbezzoli wrote: | > Some are forced into it. | | Judging by the calls I hear, I don't give them that benefit | at all. They sound pretty happy to scam the elderly. | | Maybe as a first-responder that could work, but if you're | talking to an elderly and convincing them to hand over | hundreds or thousands of dollars, you do not have my | sympathy. | esrauch wrote: | I've been in the phone system for multiple hours with Comcast | just to try to get my service activated, so it doesn't seem | that inherently ridiculous that one hour with a small company | support would result in an unfortunate disconnect at the end. | hateful wrote: | The further I get into the video (I'm not quite done yet), the | more I'm convinced that most of the people calling aren't | actually scammers, but are people that have been scammed by the | scammer to call to get their bitcoin. | | As if they've hijacked the wrong side of scam. | netsharc wrote: | I saw your comment while watching the video, you make me I | wonder the same thing. Especially if the accent sounds | Eastern European or British and not the typical accent of | these scammers... | netsharc wrote: | The cleverer scammers, or ones who think "This is bullshit" | don't make it into the video... | | I wonder if someone could do a "background check" on the domain | name of the maze website and figure out that it must be a | trap... | sumedh wrote: | > I wonder if someone could do a "background check" on the | domain name | | How is that going to help, pretty sure Kitboga would have | enabled domain privacy. | Ancalagon wrote: | Not much sympathy for these scammers but I do wonder how | desperate some of them have to be to waste so much time on a | couple hundred bitcoin max. | marginalia_nu wrote: | Sunk costs can be pretty real with these things. It's something | scammers use quite often too. | DeRock wrote: | "A couple hundred bitcoin" is worth around $7,000,000 USD | Ancalagon wrote: | A couple hundred [dollars] Bitcoin | l0b0 wrote: | That should be either "A couple hundred dollars' _worth of_ | Bitcoin " or simply "A couple hundred dollars". | mhitza wrote: | Scamming people is a multibillion $/year "market". Aside from | Kitboga, there's another channel Scammer Payback that dismantle | (sometimes, most of the time disrupt) these large call centers | that exist only to scam people. | wnevets wrote: | > but I do wonder how desperate some of them have to be to | waste so much time on a couple hundred bitcoin max. | | Its part of the same reason so many fall for scams in the first | place. They start spending the money (or whatever the reward | is) before they have it and ignore any red flags to the | contrary. | stronglikedan wrote: | That couple hundred may be a week or more salary, depending on | where they live. | chedabob wrote: | In one of the screenshots, Kitboga's fake page promises them | the equivalent of $11k in BTC. | | Considering a lot of these scams originate from countries with | low wages and high unemployment, not really surprising people | would be willing to waste a few days for the promise of a | year's salary or more. | 4gotunameagain wrote: | > Considering a lot of these scams originate from countries | with low wages | | Is it a faux pas to say the truth, which is Calcutta ? | bagels wrote: | Calcutta is not a country, but many of them are located in | in India or Bangladesh. | 4gotunameagain wrote: | I'm very much aware of the fact that Calcutta is a city. | The city where most online scammers originate from. Most | is the right word, not many. | jen729w wrote: | I'd work for a couple of days for $11k and I live in | Australia! | josu wrote: | >low wages and high unemployment | | Low wages sure, but high unemployment is not correct. Most | scammers seem to be based in India where unemployment is | around 3%. | sumedh wrote: | The low wages are not enough to live a meaningful life. | bagels wrote: | A couple hundred bitcoin? That is a substantial amount of | money. | Clubber wrote: | The owners of the companies that employe these people can make | millions a year. | abledon wrote: | The next version of this maze in say, 2025, when AI is even more | crazy... will be so beleivable. | rietta wrote: | Must be a tough balance. By posting this video he blows this | process since the scammers will now know the details. | RALaBarge wrote: | Scammers do not have a shared consciousness (some may argue | lack a conscience at all) so unless they see this video, they | don't know the details simply because it exists on YouTube. | sumedh wrote: | > Scammers do not have a shared consciousness | | They do have whatsapp group chats though. | chrisjc wrote: | Yeah, it's tough one. On one hand they make their living with | videos and need to producing and releasing, but then blow their | cover. On the other, they could be wasting scammers time and | effort for a longer time, building up years of material but | have to float the all the costs until they're ready. | | Perhaps they have something else in the works. Perhaps they're | gonna white-label the call-center/bitcoin stack they built so | that more scambaiters can "apply their brand" and get in on the | action. | | I'm hoping for some kind of AI representative functionality | that just keeps them in a conversation for hours. Perhaps they | can run full circle using AI conversation as the victim all the | way through to the bank/call-center. Kinda like the Lenny bot. | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evlFPmy-4lU | rpmisms wrote: | I know Kit through a friend. Played magic the gathering with him | once. No difference between his persona and personality, one of | those people made for the job. Absolutely great guy, too, nice | wife and kids. | | He also started off as a Web Dev. The fake banking websites are | all his own work. Really clever stuff, ironically using phishing | tactics to catch phishers. | KingGeedorah wrote: | Really, never would have thought he was a programmer. | jackmott42 wrote: | Web Dev sometimes isn't. Sometimes it is CSS and HTML and | art/design specialty. I don't say that to be a gatekeeper, I | think CSS expertise is harder! heh | JaDogg wrote: | CSS is harder indeed. | Vicinity9635 wrote: | I'd rather do assembler than CSS. | irrational wrote: | You only say that because you have spent more time in | assembler (I presume). I've spent enough time doing CSS | that I find it to be pretty easy. | Vicinity9635 wrote: | I have about equal time doing both. Still rather do | assembler. Assembler is outstandingly deterministic. CSS | feels like I'm fighting Microsoft Word. | ttoinou wrote: | In the 2000s CSS used to be more messy, now it's all | standardized across browsers, no ? Seems much easier | rpmisms wrote: | Assembler does what you tell it. CSS is like trying to | build a pile of angry turtles. | operatingthetan wrote: | He shows code in the streams all the time. | rpmisms wrote: | Mostly UI, but he can write some decent JS. | bertil wrote: | _This_ is product thinking. Let's get deep: Story time! | | I initially liked the guy but grew a bit tired of him using what | could be veiled racism for views -- I'm not accusing him of | anything; it just felt cringy-er than I like my YouTube. The | ethics are more complicated than that, but something bothered me, | especially since that special episode where they sent someone | physically there, let pests in the building, etc. | | I couldn't put my finger on why. I didn't particularly appreciate | using animals, but that wasn't it. I wasn't a fan of the tall | Serbian guy and his friend: they felt like standard prankster | YouTubers, and I wouldn't say I like those. It felt like Mark | Rober was part of it (He's my favorite YouTuber, like everyone | here) but didn't like it; he should have been more active but | wasn't... More on MR later. It's relevant--I promise. | | In the meantime, my partner (a medical doctor) has been watching | those for a while. She loved it: administrative nightmare, people | taking advantage of older people, computer glitches... there was | so much schadenfreude to keep her giggling for hours after long | shifts. I liked watching over her shoulder, recognizing the | episode, and telling her if something good was coming (those are | long). | | I have this pet theory that some jobs are intensive (you work as | much as you do, like clinical work for doctors, plumbers, bakers, | or therapists) or extensive (you do things that work for you, | like teacher, software developer!). Anyone with an intensive job | has a terrible life because they have to work too much in | construction. So I'm very tolerant of what you do after a shift | to rebuild yourself. (And I think we, the tech community, should | turn every job into an extensive one because that's a better | life). | | But there still was something that bothered me. It was about how | he needed the views to justify his time hacking them, and the | views relied on a show that was always the same, and the poor, | desperate, upset, and soon openly racist Indian "call center" | operator had to be the bad guy. Having the bad guy always have | the same skin color didn't make the viewer any less problematic. | | I thought about the theory of Moral luck (some people are in a | position where they have to make hard choices, neither option is | moral, and judging them for their worst decision without the | context is complicated), but it wasn't it... | | I thought about how, after that big bust and the subsequent one, | authorities arrested many people. They let most of them go | because, of course, the police are deeply in the pocket of the | owners that you never see in those videos, who are never really | risking much. It felt performative: nothing structural happened. | It also felt possibly "culturally racist": again, good reason to | suspect corruption in India, but without evidence, it still felt | prejudicial. But obvious. | | But then I say this video (the first two minutes, I'm waiting for | my partner to come from her shift to watch it together -- she's | going to love that one). Kitboga didn't just find something | better, automating him wasting time with others: I recognize that | team huddled around a table. That's a _product_ team. It felt | more like a physical product team, like what you see in Mark | Rober's video about his toy company, but suddenly it clicked: | | I didn't like Kitboga videos, not just because they were | ineffective, but because they couldn't scale. He had to spend | time wasting their time, "making content" to get one caller to | waste his time. This video is about someone who has done | intensive work until now, switching to automation and opening | himself to extensive work. | | This time, fighting spammers doesn't rely on at least enough of | them being "minstrels" (caricatural entertaining stereotypes: the | thing that led to the expression "black face") to make "good | content." It works as a video based on the excitement around | building and iterating on a product, led by data. | | Well, presumably led by data: I haven't watched beyond the second | minute when he says they were tracking "EVERY click," so my | product analyst self suddenly felt very involved in that part. | | That's why I like (and I'm assuming everyone on HN likes) Mark | Rober's videos: he builds a product. There's some story-telling, | but he clearly follows the ups and downs of trying to build a | systematic solution to a given problem. This is something that MR | wasn't able to do in the video with spies getting inside the call | center. | | I sometimes struggle to explain my theory about intensive and | extensive work, or what makes a company "product-driven," and why | it's so important. You rarely have both options that are easy to | compare favorably in an industry without the gap in quality being | so prevalent: industrial bread vs. hand-make baker, ready-to-wear | vs. bespoke fashion. But for so much software, having an | industrial option is usually better because quantity has a | quality of its own. | | Here, Kitboga is trying to fight an industry. It doesn't matter | that he's witty every time he's talking to an agent; he just | needs to be witty enough to edit it into his video. To fight | scammers, he needs scale -- a different scale than what millions | of viewers can give him. This automation will allow him to waste | so much scammer time that he might make the sector unprofitable. | Not sure when, where, or how... (indeed, they'll notice when they | step in a maze?), but that glimpse at possible success where no | one thought that was possible. Everyone who started a company | knows that moment, the product-market-fit, the Road-to-Damascus | glimpse: | | "Are you a billionaire? | | - Not yet, but soon. | | - How?! | | - That one guy said that I've made his day a little bit better." | | Seeing someone work on something for years and finally change-- | that's a rare sight. I'm happy it was all filmed. | | Plus, those look like horrifying UX dark patterns. I love those. | Now that I've wasted everyone's time with my theory, my partner | is finally home: let's watch it. | netsharc wrote: | FWIW, after a few videos I found Mark Rober insufferable, he | seems too full of himself. I did enjoy his first glitter vs | anti-package-thieves video, but not his later videos | bertil wrote: | Oh, his latest videos and the package-thieves are way less | entertaining than his previous ones. There are interesting | hesitations when he ponders the ethics and legality, but it's | otherwise (unfunny) schadenfreude. | | I think that's the influence of other YouTubers: he's hanging | out with the Safety Third guys, who are (as their name | implies) trying to fast-run a Darwin prize. They make | entertaining science-y stuff. He's also hanging out with Mr. | Beast, aka Jimmy Donaldson, which I suspect is why Mark is | less fun: Jimmy has this extreme discipline of optimizing | videos for views that carve the authentic excitement out to | stuff cliffhangers every second instead. | | For example, Mark Rober's previous projects, like the always- | on-target dart board, are much better. He's quite smug on | this one, too, but that's his screen persona: an over- | confident Californian frat-ish dude turning into "the best" | uncle. He talks about this offline; it's his way of making | childish pranks fit his adult frame. | | If you like the dart-board one more but thought it was too | prankish, you might like Shane Wighton of Stuff Made Here in | the Pacific North West: he's more earnest about how hard it | is to make hardware. There are still the occasional pranks | (and the over-confidence because he's using a robot), but | there are a lot more technical details. His on-screen persona | with his wife (who claims, on screen, to hate all his ideas) | is not very credible, but more grown-up than Mark Rober's | Nerf gun fights. | | Otherwise, Destin Sandlin of Smarter Everyday is the actual | fun uncle, a Southern engineer to the core and a lot more | earnest on screen. Alec Watson of Technology Connections is a | MidWestern fix-it-all, who cares far too much about old tech. | And finally, Tech Ingredients is the real deal: New | Englander, no messing around, projects that are genuinely | breakthroughs, with enough detail to reproduce in your | garage. | netsharc wrote: | Well, to derail this to a review of YouTubers I've seen, | Destin is okay, his happy optimistic about everything | attitude annoys the dark-hearted cynic in me a bit. | | Technology Connections: interesting content, sometimes the | humor is cringeworthy. He knows he's making a cringe joke | or a very very lame pun, so he leans into it, "I know this | joke isn't funny but the fact that you're aware that I'm | aware that I'm making a lame joke makes it funny again ha | ha ha" while my eyes roll hard, but hey maybe some people | find the meta-joke (or is it a meta-meta-joke? Or am I | missing his meta-meta-jokes?) hilarious and clever. Tech | Ingredients is so serious and great! | | Other YouTubers I enjoy are Matthias Wandel and | Electroboom. | bertil wrote: | 100% with you. Shane Wighton (Stuff Made Here) might be | the cynic you want. He makes some cringy self-referential | jokes, but he's genuinely that one magical engineer | everyone wants on his team. | pests wrote: | > Jimmy has this extreme discipline of optimizing videos | for views that carve the authentic excitement out to stuff | cliffhangers every second instead. | | Remind's me of the Patrick's long-standing urge for Colin | to improve pricing / not using picodollars on Tarsnap. | | > His on-screen persona with his wife [...] is not very | credible | | Love Stuff Made Here. I find those segments so awkward but | also very endearing. Cringe levels of forced acting... but | it has grown to work. | | Some other interesting builders: | | Imphenzia - rocket experiments, nozzle design | | Jeremy Fielding - robotics, motors, general engineering | | styropyro - lasers, optics | | The Thought Emporium - genetic engineering, gene splicing, | dna editing, etc | | rctestflight - rc drones, airplanes, submarines, boats | | Clickspring - antikythera mechanism, watchmaking | | French Guy Cooking - unique mix of food and diy engineering | (never seen a workshop and kitchen combined before) | kacesensitive wrote: | I would watch a quieter, more humble Mark Rober. | | Kitboga definitely isn't using veiled racism like other | scambaiters, unless you consider scambaiting itself racist to | an extent. | | As far as the "cannot scale" argument. His videos are | educational. Most times here starts and ends his videos with a | warning and a message to make sure you and your loved ones know | how to spot these scammers. I for one have shared his videos | with grandparents and they loved them, but were also saddened | that some people do fall for these things. Since they were made | aware, I would say they are 10x as safe when talking on the | phone and browsing the web, maybe even to a fault since now | they call me when something looks phishy... Anyways as long as | his channel is growing and more people consume his content and | spread awareness, it is scaling. | bertil wrote: | > I would watch a quieter, more humble Mark Rober. | | There is definitely too much Californian energy there... but | I have to work with guys like that, so I try to get myself | used to the unjustifiable yelling and gratuitous positivity. | | I've mentioned alternatives who I would recommend in another | comment: | | > * Shane Wighton of Stuff Made Here in the Pacific North | West: more earnest about how hard it is to make hardware > > | * Destin Sandlin of Smarter Everyday is the actual fun uncle, | a Southern engineer to the core and a lot more earnest on | screen. > > * Alec Watson of Technology Connections is a | MidWestern fix-it-all who cares far too much about old tech > | > * Tech Ingredients is the real deal: New Englander, no | messing around, projects that are genuine breakthroughs with | enough detail to reproduce in your garage | | > unless you consider scambaiting itself racist to an extent | | Yeah... It's not that it is, but it's not clear enough that | it's not. Makes me feel uncomfortable. The best explanation I | have is this joke (about a different problem): | https://youtu.be/nu6C2KL_S9o | | > Since they were made aware, | | I see the argument behind education, and it does scale in | that way -- I initially listed YouTuber as an extensive work | because it's not a million times harder to make 10 million | views than 10 views. There's more than one input into work. | | But I don't know how many aging people have loved ones who | will show them Kitboga videos. He still interrupts scams all | the time. He's a preventative measure in a world with | scammers. His mocking of them hasn't eradicated the practice. | If he traps enough of them into eternal Captchas, until the | center doesn't make enough money, then he might convince the | rich owners to do something else (train AI, I guess) and make | the scam centers disappear. And that feels transformative. | phatfish wrote: | Essentially prank calling scammers gets old fast, and is just | an avenue to make money from Youtube. Which means upping the | ante to keep viewers, eventually videos reach a grey area where | they get as mean as the scammers themselves. | | This automated method is cool though, so it makes an | interesting video. Could have done without the Kraken shilling | though, they are part of the problem. | naet wrote: | The part where someone waits for a super long time in a queue, | finally gets connected, but then gets sent to an answering | machine that says "the mailbox is full" hit too close to home. I | know this was set up on purpose but I've had that exact same | thing happen to me on a real & important government system | recently. | | I've been trying to call California EDD to get some back pay for | my state paid family leave. There is no option to get what I need | online, I need to call in. I've had that exact thing happen twice | after an hour of waiting in the queue... phone rings, goes to | voicemail, full mailbox, line gets disconnected. And I have about | a 1/100 rate of even getting a chance to join the queue when I | call; usually I hear that the queue is too full to join at all. | It's absolutely maddening and I may never get my PFL paid out | properly. | aceazzameen wrote: | I've had this happen to me with a bank before! It was nuts. | Eventually I DM'd their twitter account and got the customer | service I needed. | wing-_-nuts wrote: | Calling comcast customer support almost guarantees this | happens. You call in, repeatedly ask for a representative, they | will hang up on you. The only way I've reliably been able to | talk to anyone to say you wish to 'Talk to a representative | about cancelling my account'. | | TBH, I kind of dread when they start incorporating LLMs or | better ai, because it will be truly impossible to speak to a | human anymore. | ilamont wrote: | > The only way I've reliably been able to talk to anyone to | say you wish to 'Talk to a representative about cancelling my | account'. | | Threatening to leave is also a reliable technique to stop | ridiculous price hikes and even get hefty discounts. | | Sometimes you have to talk to someone on the "retention | team." At other times you can do it online. Most recently I | preserved the NYT intro rate of $4 every 4 weeks (instead of | $25) and I got a 33% discount on an Adobe subscription after | they announced a 50% price hike and I started the | cancellation process. | m-p-3 wrote: | You have to accept that they might actually cancel the | account, and deal with the inconvenience of actually | switching (which may be worth it anyway). | pests wrote: | My uncle calls up all his service providers at least twice | a year and threatens to cancel just to see what they offer | him. It's had a very positive ROI. | Miserlou57 wrote: | As a generally left leaning government trusting Silicon Valley | tech bro, the California PFL nightmare has been so awful it has | been enough to at least instill thoughts of moving to live off | grid in Idaho and starting an anti government ... group | jf wrote: | Regarding your issues with CA EDD: Call the office of your | California state assembly representative and ask for their | help. | naet wrote: | Thanks for the tip, I will definitely try that as an | alternative option. I just looked up who mine was, and they | had a section on their website about requesting help with | EDD, so it must be something that they hear about often. | | I basically gave up on calling EDD directly as it's just not | possible to get through. I did get through to somebody once, | in probably over 200 calls, and multiple hour long holds, and | it's just not feasible to keep trying to make this with my | work and my family and everything. You need to make it a full | time job if you want to go through that channel. | verve_rat wrote: | Can you post them a letter? | rvba wrote: | The worst is that there are multiple startups that offer a | "call back" service. | rickreynoldssf wrote: | Calling EDD at 7:00:00 AM, the second they open, will usually | get your call answered. Or it may be 8:00 I forget... If you | call too early you'll get a message telling you so. | | Also take note of the menu options you need to select so when | you call back you can bypass all the blah, blah, blah in most | cases. | dap wrote: | I feel for you about EDD. They still owe us several thousand | dollars in unemployment due to a pandemic layoff but I gave up | on it after a similar experience to what you're describing. | JaDogg wrote: | Kudos to Kitboga! | | But let's really think about it, isn't it true that most things | in the world are some form of a scam? | | Growing up in a poor country, I've realized that scams are | everywhere, right from the day you start school: | | 1) Parents resort to scamming the school hiring board using fake | addresses just to enroll their children in a good school. | | 2) In the early years, students learn how to cheat in exams to | survive. | | 3) Teachers unfairly give lower marks to students (or parents) | who don't buy into their side hustles like private tutoring or | educational CDs. | | 4) Movies and music are all pirated, contributing to this cycle | of deception. | | 5) Even radio and TV shows shamelessly copy Hollywood | productions. | | 6) Need to get something done at a government office? Be prepared | to pay bribes. | | 7) If you want to leave the country / immigration purposes, you | have to navigate a web of bribery and money-grabbing schemes at | every level. | | 8) Far-right racism use pseudo-science to deceive people into | thinking that the majority is superior. | | 9) There are fake diploma and degree providers scamming people | within the same country. | | 10) Interested in day trading? Beware of commission-driven scams | and cryptocurrency schemes targeting people from your own | country. | | 11) If you need the government to fix a road, you have to | approach politicians and plead for something they promised in the | first place. | | 12) Even small local shops dilute products, potentially selling | toxic items to unsuspecting customers. | | 13) Need water? Attempting to approach politicians is futile. | Eventually, the local community took matters into their own | hands, establishing a private company to provide water. By the | time standard water lines were laid, the locals had already | constructed the water tank. (My father played a significant role | in this endeavor - the type of person politicians dislike, haha!) | | 14) As elections draw near, there is a sudden decrease in the | prices of goods. | | 15) Having trouble conceiving? Thinking of consulting the local | guru? Don't worry; if your daughter bears a resemblance to the | guru, it's all good. | | 16) A women fell victim to a | cryptobro/environmentalist/spiritualist/influencer scammer. | Interestingly, this scammers's father is also a con artist who | specifically targets older women (he's the old school type). | (It's essential to educate your children about pickup artists and | red pill nonsense; unfortunately, these tactics sometimes work | and are genuinely dangerous.) | | --- | | It's no surprise that people resort to scams, likely due to a | lack of empathy, extreme cynicism, narcissistic personality | disorder, or some combination thereof. Extracting individuals | from this mindset requires significant effort. | montag wrote: | Sounds like you are talking about a very specific place. I | object to the reduction that "most things in the world are some | form of a scam." High-trust societies do exist. | JaDogg wrote: | I agree. Extracting individuals from this mindset requires | significant effort. -- this applies to me too. | Jeff_Brown wrote: | I literally can't think of anything funnier I've seen in my life. | digital-cygnet wrote: | What I don't understand is the bit at the end (spoilers): he | finds out that a person who Kraken's fraud team sees as a victim | of scams, but hasn't been able to contact, has called his | Gauntlet. He's then able to reach out and help her, as well as | other scam victims who end up in the Gauntlet. | | So, three questions - | | 1. How do scam victims end up in the Gauntlet at all? I thought | the idea was that Kitboga and his team pose as marks, send the | bogus QR code to the scammer, and that's their whole pipeline. | How do legitimate people end up in there? | | 2. Assuming the above is something like "scammers are clearly | manipulating scam victims into helping them with the Gauntlet", | doesn't that raise questions about the glee with which he, and | all of us, are watching "scammers'" frustration? It becomes a | more nuanced moral calculus if some number of the people you are | frustrating are innocent people manipulated into navigating this | system for scammers. You could argue it's still net good because | otherwise the effort spent manipulating them would have been | spent doing a real scam on them, but honestly I'm not sure | | 3. How did they identify the non-scammers who ended up on the | platform? If there was a solid answer to this I suppose it could | mitigate (2), but it's hard for me to believe (unless it's | something very labor intensive that would make the automated | nature of the system less useful) | | Overall I still enjoyed the video and found parts completely | hilarious (and far too realistic given my own experience on phone | trees). But the above does give me pause about unreserved support | for what he's doing | nickphx wrote: | It would be interesting to see how far the 'scammers' would go in | an attempt to withdraw funds. I imagine someone that sits for | hours on hold and revisits numerous times would happily install a | mobile app. One could develop a mobile app that collects data | from scammer while presenting a simple web view of existing trap | sites. | DonHopkins wrote: | Whenever I get a scam call, the first thing I do is say "Oh, this | sounds VERY important, thank you for calling me. Please give me | your phone number so I can call you back in case we get cut off." | | Most of the time they hang up immediately, because the last thing | they want is for me to call them back, but recently one scammer | took the bait and tried to give me a fake phone number: | 123456789. | | So I pretended to believe them and earnestly write it down, but I | kept getting the digits wrong and reading them back incorrectly, | and asking them to repeat it, talking over them by reading the | digits back while they were reading the next digits, repeating | and swapping and missing digits, pretending not to get that it | was an obviously fake phone number, until it drove them crazy | that I could not understand something as simple as 123456789. | | Then I asked for their company name ("Bitcoin Company"), and web | site ("bitcoin.com"), and then tried to have them guide me | through logging in, reading them what I saw on the page and | clicked on to log in, and asking them where to click and what to | enter and what to do next. | | They finally got really angry frustrated and yelled at me and | hung up, but not before I berated them for being a scammer! | johnyzee wrote: | Anyone remember the anti-scammer phone bot that pretended to be a | senile old man ('Lemmy' or something)? It waited for the scammer | to stop talking, and then said some statement (either a question | or some really long rambling story), simultaneously hilarious and | expertly crafted to keep the conversation going, often for hours, | until it would start repeating itself and the scammer would blow | up. | | It was a bit smarter than this (otherwise beautiful) scam, | because the conversation flowed very naturally (exploiting the | fact that scammers love to talk, given the opportunity). Idea for | your next version! | | There used to be a bunch of examples on youtube, but I couldn't | find them just now. | DonHopkins wrote: | Lenny: | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lenny_(bot) | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XSoOrlh5i1k | | https://www.reddit.com/r/itslenny/comments/5lcfwq/lennys_his... | | Also, I highly recommend the movie, "Sorry to Bother You": | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sorry_to_Bother_You | | SORRY TO BOTHER YOU | Official Trailer: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=enH3xA4mYcY | | With LaKeith Stanfield playing Cash, and David Cross playing | Cash's "white voice"! | | The Art Of The White Voice by David Cross and Patton Oswalt | (Sorry to Bother You): | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxZt3sD3rzo | | Watch Lakeith Stanfield Use His 'White Voice' in 'Sorry to | Bother You' | Anatomy of a Scene: | | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PY9RQFX28j0 | spondylosaurus wrote: | Sorry to Bother You is a wild movie. The less you know about | the plot going into it, the better. (I was _not_ expecting... | the thing. You know which one.) | johnyzee wrote: | He should try to make the scammers pay a small fee for 'premium | support'. | sumedh wrote: | How are they going to pay the fee? | l0b0 wrote: | The really sad part is how many of these you'd encounter | regularly when talking to "real" companies: | | - Voice deliberately downsampled to the point where it's like | listening to a walkie-talkie on a propeller plane. | | - Insanely terrible pause "music", at full volume, downsampled | and volume-boosted to the point where it physically hurts. | | - Random disconnects. | | - Circular redirects. | | And this is while being polite and patient with the poor person | working for these assholes all day. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-11-03 23:00 UTC)