[HN Gopher] Only 15% of Californians can afford a home, new data... ___________________________________________________________________ Only 15% of Californians can afford a home, new data shows Author : LinuxBender Score : 25 points Date : 2023-11-11 22:15 UTC (44 minutes ago) (HTM) web link (ktla.com) (TXT) w3m dump (ktla.com) | gustavus wrote: | > The new figures represent the lowest home affordability rate | since 2007, a news release said. | | Oh that's interesting.... What year came after 2007? | jeffbee wrote: | Ah I love that last paragraph. The good news is you can always | move to Mono County, a place with no economy or population to | speak of. Simply move to Bridgeport. | s0rce wrote: | Winters are also quite cold in Bridgeport, even by non- | California standards. | zerr wrote: | https://web.archive.org/web/20231111221611/https://ktla.com/... | woeirua wrote: | Don't worry, I'm sure the usual real estate shills will be by to | assure us that were not in a bubble and that prices only go up. | jeffbee wrote: | People who own houses in expensive coastal markets can't easily | be dislodged. We can't force them to put their houses on the | market or adopt reasonable prices. The rental market, however, | is a quite different thing. I track the rental market in | Berkeley very closely and while rents have been steadily | declining since 2019, in the past few months they have been | plummeting. Current market price for older 1-bedroom apartments | has fallen back to 2009 levels. Almost sort of affordable. | | I have a feeling that a lot of small-time landlords who thought | they were signing up for a lifetime of "passive income" are | getting kicked in the teeth right now. | 2devnull wrote: | I find that dubious but want to believe. Can you cite the | numbers at least? | jeffbee wrote: | All my data and methods are at | https://observablehq.com/@jwb/berkeley-rent-board-data | | The key graph is https://observablehq.com/@jwb/berkeley- | rent-board-data#cell-... | YeBanKo wrote: | California has one of the lowest property tax rate, yet one | of the highest income tax. We need the opposite to | incentivize the right behaviors . | tqi wrote: | Yeah San Francisco "natives" love to shit on transplants | for pricing out locals, while conveniently ignoring the | fact that "natives" are the ones jacking up the rent. For | years 1/3 of every paycheck went to an SF "native", but I'm | the asshole? | rcpt wrote: | > We can't force them to put their houses on the market or | adopt reasonable prices | | At the very least we could stop sinking tens of billions of | dollars every year into tax cuts that essentially force them | to never sell. | | Every single California housing issue is because of Prop 13. | lmm wrote: | Assuming they can keep making it illegal to build new homes, | prices will keep going up. It's worked fine for them so far. | slt2021 wrote: | thanks to newsom, it is all his legacy that he is trying to | expand nationally by trying to become presidential candidate | sometime in the future | pauldenton wrote: | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExgxwKnH8y4 If only Californians | didn't actively try to stop construction. If you want to build | housing and that will cast a shadow on a nearby playground, | that's no good. California is literally the worst and most | expensive place to develop anything. | WillPostForFood wrote: | Title is misrepresents what the report says. The report says that | 15% can afford the *median* priced home, not "afford a home". 15% | isn't good, not is bad as the article suggests. | pixl97 wrote: | So, a better dataset would be breaking housing prices down into | availability brackets with matched with earnings. What does the | data look like then? | dangus wrote: | As far as home ownership _rate_ , over 50% of Californians own | their home. | | https://ipropertymanagement.com/research/homeownership-rate-... | | It is the second lowest number in the country, but I always find | articles like these a bit of a contrast compared to the actual | home ownership statistics. | habitue wrote: | Home ownership rate is a lagging indicator, affordability is a | leading indicator. | | Many people in California own their homes because they bought | them a long time ago and held on. | fiddlerwoaroof wrote: | I wonder if there's some measure to forecast this, though: if | the median age of a homeowner is x years (and the trend is | aging), then in y years, half the currently owned houses will | have changed owners. What are the values of x and y? | xyzelement wrote: | What that means is that significantly more Californians are | trying to buy a home compared to what is available as inventory. | If you somehow "reset" the price to some arbitrarily "low" level, | it would immediately get bid back up to what it is today. | | On the other hand, if you somehow flooded the market with | thousands of homes and there were fewer buyers than that, the | price would plummet. | bequanna wrote: | It would take many, many thousands of homes. | | Demand is so much greater than supply almost everywhere in the | US. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-11-11 23:00 UTC)