[HN Gopher] Pig brain function under extracorporeal pulsatile ci... ___________________________________________________________________ Pig brain function under extracorporeal pulsatile circulatory control Author : bookofjoe Score : 41 points Date : 2023-11-18 18:16 UTC (4 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.nature.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.nature.com) | xeckr wrote: | A literal brain in a vat. | isoprophlex wrote: | _To this end, blood flow to the head was surgically separated | from the systemic circulation and full extracorporeal pulsatile | circulatory control (EPCC) was delivered_ | | On the whole, it doesn't sound like a very nice procedure for | the brain (or the rest of the pig) | cariaso wrote: | 3.5 million pigs are slaughtered for food each day. | | 2 pig subjects "were sedated with an intramuscular injection | of tiletamine and zolazepam (4-8 mg/kg of each, in equal | amount), atropine (0.04 mg/kg) and buprenorphine (0.05 | mg/kg). They were then administered inhaled isoflurane, | except during neurophysiological recording as noted below, | and oxygen (2 L/min). These gases were applied first via | snout mask and immediately afterwards via endotracheal | intubation with mechanical ventilatory support. General | anesthesia was maintained throughout the rest of the life of | the animals, including euthanasia." | | That protocol was approved by some suitable committee, in | accordance with the Animal Welfare Act and similar protocols. | I think most people informed of the details and the purpose | of the research would agree the benefits easily justify the | cost of their sacrifice. | j-pb wrote: | I don't think that the absolute horrors that are the modern | meat industry, somehow lessen the tragedy of animal | testing. | a1o wrote: | So we are making progress to the future promised by Futurama. | carbocation wrote: | They address this but I still don't really understand why I | should care about pulsatility. Humans can live for a very long | time without pulsatile flow (LVAD). (And sure, to pre-empt | critics: the needle has turned back towards at least intermittent | pulsatility, but this is largely for device thrombosis | prevention.) | | They seem to bring up theoretical concerns without addressing the | practical (again, in human) successes of non-pulsatile flow. | iancmceachern wrote: | Excellent question. | | I've worked in the LVAD and artificial heart industry, designed | several. | | You are right, that most modern LVADs are rotary pumps which | are technically non pulsatile. I say technically because yes, | if you test the pump on a bench of course it's not pulsatile. | But once they're implanted, and working in concert with the | native heart the net result is somewhere in between. You have | more flow that you did before, less puksatile, but still | pulsatile. | | The implant guidance for most lvads calls for the clinicians to | lower the speed setting of the lvad until they can see the | aortic valve intermittently opening and closing on echo. If | they set the setting too high and the valve stays open, or too | low and it doesn't often open, it will calcify in one of those | two positions. | | If they follow this guidance, the net flow is pulsatile. | | Onto your question. | | Look up "pump head". This is what happens to the brain on truly | non puksatile flow, like you get when your on extended periods | of support on a heart lung bypass machine. | | Check out a company "ventriflo" who is working on a pulsatile | pump in this space to overcome these traditional challenges. I | helped design this too. | | Cheers! | bobmaxup wrote: | > Look up "pump head". | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postperfusion_syndrome | tomr75 wrote: | Results in lower GI bleeding too (pulsation). Don't know the | physics but ?less shear stress | lifeisstillgood wrote: | Ok. I'll bite. | | This strikes me as going too far. | | the justification (upfront which is not as usual for most papers | I come across which explain what they did that was so cool first) | is something like it's hard to determine if what drugs we give to | a brain is just brain based or is the darn body getting involved | too. | | But you know, if I understand that right, then we are mostly | going to want to care about the brain and body together - cos | that's how most of us function. | | I get it's an engineering challenge. I also get that | experimenting with certain things is just off-limits, foetuses | being the first thing that come to mind. | | I am a huge proponent for increasing science funding every day of | the week, for undirected research because we don't know what we | don't know, but sometimes we just need to say, find another way. | chpatrick wrote: | I think you would feel differently if one day your heart stops | and the doctors can stop you from getting brain damage using | this technology. | LightMachine wrote: | Exactly. That kind of anti-scientific propaganda is | dangerous. OP shouldn't have so many upvotes. | Teever wrote: | I resent the attempt to tie the entirety of science to the | use of animals in experiments. | | Someone can still be a strong proponent of the scientific | method but be opposed to animal testing for moral reasons. | chpatrick wrote: | What's more moral, experimenting on one pig or letting | thousands of people die who could be helped by your | research? | krisoft wrote: | Or as an alternative question: is it less moral to do | this experiment than eating the pig? Because society | seems to be by far and large be okay with eating pigs. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-11-18 23:00 UTC)