[HN Gopher] Periodic Table of Tools
       ___________________________________________________________________
        
       Periodic Table of Tools
        
       Author : andyjohnson0
       Score  : 215 points
       Date   : 2023-11-26 12:14 UTC (10 hours ago)
        
 (HTM) web link (periodictableoftools.com)
 (TXT) w3m dump (periodictableoftools.com)
        
       | sindoc wrote:
       | Thank you for sharing. Seems like well organized dataset. I like
       | datasets that connect the real world to the digital world
        
       | phkahler wrote:
       | Did I miss profile gauge?
        
         | mc32 wrote:
         | Depends. They had dial instruments and micrometers, but not
         | like spark "feeler" plug gauges. Also no voltmeters (they had
         | powered equipment though)
         | 
         | Come to think of it, I didn't notice some of tools you'd need
         | to work on an engine.
        
       | mauvehaus wrote:
       | This displays what I would consider to be a fairly limited
       | knowledge of tools.
       | 
       | Saws, for instance, take a variety of forms, and lumping all of
       | the large ones into "big saws" rather ignores the fact that their
       | use is fundamentally dependent on what kind of saw they are. Not
       | their size. And perplexingly, miniature table saws are lumped in
       | with other big saws.
       | 
       | I'd also submit that a bung hole auger (lumped in with antique
       | augers) is a reaming tool, not a drilling tool. Though one of the
       | ones shown is a combination tool. There's an auger at the front
       | to drill the hole, followed by the reamer to ream the taper. The
       | important bit is still the reamer though, meaning the tool could
       | properly be called a bung hole reamer.
        
         | IshKebab wrote:
         | Too pedantic. I don't think the categories are meant to imply
         | that the tools are similar to each other.
        
           | f1shy wrote:
           | Agree about pedantic. But "periodic table" for me implies
           | some similarity.
        
             | spurgu wrote:
             | Yeah I was also expecting a more well-thought-out structure
             | given the periodic table layout.
        
       | kbutler wrote:
       | Was I alone in expecting software engineering tools?
        
         | ofrzeta wrote:
         | I indeed thought about software tools although not software
         | engineering in particular. More like classic Unix tools.
        
         | remram wrote:
         | It would probably be very interesting, since everything old is
         | new. A column with RRD/Graphite/Grafana,
         | inetd/systems/Kubernetes, fat/ext2/btrfs,
         | Lustre/GlusterFS/Ceph, grep/ack/ripgrep
        
           | 082349872349872 wrote:
           | If columns were arranged as "can be used as a quick and dirty
           | substitute for" going up and "subsumes but is often overkill
           | for" going down I guess we'd wind up with a Periodic Tree of
           | Tools (with emacs and web browsers somewhere near the trunk)?
        
       | mpolichette wrote:
       | I like the cataloging, but I dont see the periodic part of this.
        
         | tyingq wrote:
         | _" The arrangement follows loosely the characteristic of the
         | regular periodic table: tools with similar functions in each
         | column, getting heavier as you move down the rows."_[1]
         | 
         | I can see perhaps not agreeing with their decisions, so maybe
         | the groupings don't look correct to you, but they seem to have
         | made some effort to be "periodic".
         | 
         | [1] https://home.theodoregray.com/printed-products
        
           | NeoTar wrote:
           | It feels like they were perhaps hindered by wanting to
           | conform to the chemical periodic table format.
        
           | gcanyon wrote:
           | I'm not criticizing you for this, obviously, but "heavier" is
           | a silly attribute to increase as you go down the table. It
           | makes sense for the actual periodic table, but here something
           | like "complexity" "modernity" or "scale" would have made much
           | more sense (to me, obviously).
        
             | jprete wrote:
             | But atoms literally get heavier as you go down the table.
             | If the actual elements were ordered in complexity of
             | compounds, hydrogen would be at the bottom of the table,
             | and periodic table posters would have to come with a
             | special "carbon" sticker to attach to the floor.
        
               | gcanyon wrote:
               | Yes, I'm agreeing that mass (or more accurately, proton
               | count) makes sense for the elements. I'm saying it _doesn
               | 't_ make sense for tools.
        
       | IshKebab wrote:
       | This is really cool. He sure owns a lot of tools! You could make
       | a pretty neat display of them in a museum. Way more interesting
       | than endless paintings and porcelain.
        
       | CapitalistCartr wrote:
       | Woohoo! There's tools here I don't have.
        
       | smeej wrote:
       | This has a great auxiliary use for those of us who don't know
       | about all the tools, and/or don't know the names of the tools.
       | It's going to make me sound a lot less stupid at the hardware
       | store!
        
         | gumby wrote:
         | One of the great things about having a German speaking kid is
         | the number of books that show all the entries in a given
         | category (e.g. a huge book with hundreds of earth moving
         | apparatus and the specific name of each)
         | 
         | In America I could only get close with farm animals and guns.
        
           | PTOB wrote:
           | Could you recommend some titles? I not only enjoy German
           | thoroughness, but I am also tickled by the
           | schlamminvordstogezah style of German tool naming.
        
             | gumby wrote:
             | Sorry, kid has long grown up and moved out. I guess I'll
             | get a second wave when grandkids start appearing. But any
             | bookshop kids' section will have heaps of them. IIRC
             | Gerstenberg Verlag was a good source, but that was a while
             | ago.
             | 
             | Also the Was ist Was series had the best explanations of
             | how real stuff (locomotives, printing press, sexual
             | reproduction, etc) works. If you can't find the books I'm
             | sure some of the videos are on YouTube.
        
         | Prcmaker wrote:
         | Can't agree more. When we get tool or parts catalogues through
         | work on the break room table, I recommend to all our graduates
         | they spend time going through it, and to look up things they
         | don't understand. Knowing the tool for the job already exists
         | can save so much time and money, and while that genre of tool
         | may change significantly, it applies to all fields of
         | engineering.
        
         | oooyay wrote:
         | I'm chuckling a bit because I get this feeling of consternation
         | every time I run into something that doesn't go very smoothly.
         | For instance, learning I was using the wrong kind of hammer for
         | roofing saved my wrist from breaking. I've been collecting
         | woodworking and carpentry tools and teaching myself as I go. If
         | you really want to develop some intuition for what to use and
         | when then learn about the basics of carpentry and wood working:
         | routing, planing, joining/jointing, sawing, drilling, gluing,
         | sanding, and finishing. The difference between machine and hand
         | tools often comes down to surface area and/or density (that may
         | not be holistically correct, but it satisfies my bar for a rule
         | of thumb).
        
       | gcanyon wrote:
       | I find myself unreasonably frustrated by this arrangement.
       | "Screwdriver Bits" are not the base level of the screwdriver
       | column -- "Screwdrivers" are. And the second column from left is
       | just a mess: stampers are similar to rivets are similar to nail
       | guns... how?
       | 
       | I'm sure this is a personal preference thing but (to me) the
       | columns should be thematically similar, off the top of my head (I
       | am not skilled at manufacturing nor construction):
       | 1. Things that pound things into other things (hammers)
       | 2. Things that twist things into other things (screwdrivers)
       | 3. Things that join things (staples, rivets, etc. -- yes, I get
       | that this covers both nails and screws)         4. Things that
       | shape things         5. Things that split things         6.
       | Things that cut things         7. Things that break things down
       | 8. Things that mix things         9. Things that contain things
       | 10. Things that move single things         11. Things that move
       | aggregate things         12. Things that etch things         13.
       | Things that measure the size of things         14. Things that
       | measure the mass of things         15. Things that measure force
       | 16. Things that measure other attributes?
       | 
       | I'm sure there are more.
        
         | pvg wrote:
         | _I 'm sure there are more._
         | 
         | things that have just broken a flower vase, things that tremble
         | as if they were mad, suckling pigs
        
           | gcanyon wrote:
           | I'm not sure how this is a valid criticism? I gave actual
           | categories of things-tools-do. You just made up nonsense
           | tasks?
        
             | yorwba wrote:
             | It's a reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Celestial
             | _Emporium_of_Benevole...
        
               | gcanyon wrote:
               | Thanks, TIL!
        
       | cush wrote:
       | Could they have chosen a worse image to depict Screwdriver Bits?
       | 
       | https://periodictableoftools.com/Images/002/002.640.jpg
        
         | dinkleberg wrote:
         | Haha I had the opposite reaction. This page was worth checking
         | out for that alone.
        
       | analog31 wrote:
       | >>>> This thing is called a chain whip. No, it's not what you
       | think. It's a wrench, but with no way to close the chain into a
       | ring. So how can you use it to grip anything?
       | 
       | It's for grabbing a sprocket on a bike wheel.
        
       | chongli wrote:
       | I really like the idea but it needs to be a giant poster. On my
       | 13" laptop screen it's so tiny and so compact that it presents an
       | all-out high-frequency visual information assault on my senses.
       | It's very unsettling and uncomfortable to use, for that reason. I
       | really just want everything to be spread out a bit more.
        
         | furyofantares wrote:
         | It is http://home.theodoregray.com/printed-products
        
       | Tomte wrote:
       | Just today I put
       | https://mitpressbookstore.mit.edu/book/9780762498307 on my Amazon
       | wish list.
        
       | digdugdirk wrote:
       | For those people who find this frustratingly incorrect/incomplete
       | - this is an art project, not a an attempt at creating a taxonomy
       | of tools.
       | 
       | For those people who have little experience with the trades -
       | this is an art project, and building up your understanding of
       | tools from this resource probably isn't a great idea.
       | 
       | For those people who can't get the screwdriver bits image out of
       | their mind - I'm with you.
        
         | demondemidi wrote:
         | We know. I think the main objection is that it is just more
         | noise and clickbait that really teaches nothing[0], or this
         | case, buybait.
         | 
         | [0] I think it actually unteaches things as it obfuscates the
         | point of the shape of the periodic table.
        
           | synthos wrote:
           | Definitely buybait and a shame that a blatant advertisement
           | has made to YC news front page. What's next? Novelty
           | toothpaste for nerds?
        
             | demondemidi wrote:
             | > Novelty toothpaste for nerds?
             | 
             | One that changes color the longer you brush so that you
             | know you've brushed sufficiently (and not just blood-red to
             | indicate your gums are now bleeding).
             | 
             | One that changes color based on where the calculus on your
             | teeth accumulated, so you can target you brushing.
             | 
             | One that does the brushing for you, just keep it in your
             | mouth for 3 minutes and rinse.
             | 
             | Oh lord...
        
               | schoen wrote:
               | > One that changes color based on where the calculus on
               | your teeth accumulated, so you can target you brushing.
               | 
               | This exists, although for some reason I'm not aware that
               | it's available as part of a toothpaste. (Maybe the
               | toothpaste foam would create false positive indications
               | by making it seem to accumulate in places that don't
               | actually have plaque.)
               | 
               | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disclosing_tablets
        
               | demondemidi wrote:
               | Blast! I was hoping readers would be too young to
               | remember and I would get the credit. \O_O/ ... I used to
               | get these from the dentist as kid in the 70's.
        
       | iamwil wrote:
       | This is one of my few pet peeves on the internet. The periodic
       | table of X often isn't periodic, and shouldn't look anything like
       | the periodic table of elements.
        
         | civilitty wrote:
         | The author added granite surface plates at atomic #69 (way out
         | in the lanthanides) because:
         | 
         |  _> Granite flats can be used as mounting surfaces for machines
         | that need to stay very accurately aligned. Dozens of these huge
         | precision granite blocks were sold as scrap to a local stone
         | dealer, and I happened to pull up in their lot just after they
         | had unloaded them. Blocks were piled up everywhere, blocking
         | the driveway and generally making a nuisance of themselves, so
         | the owner offered to sell me a bunch cheap just to get them out
         | of his hair. I was told that the two mounting surfaces on each
         | block are flat and parallel within millionths of an inch. This
         | could be true, and if it is you're looking at some of the most
         | expensive lawn furniture in the world. I rented a rough-terrain
         | forklift to arranged them in my front yard. There they remain
         | to this day, 25 years later. 25 million years from now they
         | will probably still be there, buried under the debris of a
         | thousand civilizations come and gone._ [1]
         | 
         | Not to be a debbie downer but there's zero order to this
         | "periodic" table. If there were, the granite plates would be
         | somewhere in the first couple of rows as the foundation to the
         | industrial revolution. We wouldn't have had precision
         | manufacturing or 95% of the modern tools on that table without
         | them. Building them was the first time humans figured out how
         | to make perfect flat surfaces without which our world wouldn't
         | be possible.
         | 
         | [1] https://periodictableoftools.com/Items/T0702.html
        
       | ericra wrote:
       | The majority of comments here are pedantic nitpicking about
       | proper tool categorization, improper use of the term "periodic",
       | etc. Why?
       | 
       | This is someone's art project, it's pretty cool. Enjoy the thing
       | if you like it! It's not meant to be an encyclopedia.
        
         | pvg wrote:
         | A good way to improve the thread is to write about something
         | you like or found interesting the submission. Writing meta
         | about how terrible the thread is just makes it worse.
        
       | CoastalCoder wrote:
       | Since this is just begging to be hung in a workshop / man-cave,
       | I'd like to mention a related poster: [0]
       | 
       | Extra legit because Nick Offerman's non-acting job is running a
       | woodworking shop.
       | 
       | [0] https://www.nbcstore.com/products/parks-and-recreation-
       | swans...
        
       | causality0 wrote:
       | This more of a random sampling than anything attempting to
       | include the most important tools. For example, the hammers
       | section has a foam Minecraft pickaxe but doesn't have a slide
       | hammer.
        
       | dvh wrote:
       | No Burke bar among pry bars? Sacrilege!
        
       | Animats wrote:
       | So many old friends. I miss TechShop.
        
         | AareyBaba wrote:
         | There's MakerNexus as an alternative now.
        
       | batguano wrote:
       | Amused to see the 10mm socket in an "in case of emergency break
       | glass" box. So true about 10mm, though I'd lean towards the 10mm
       | box wrench. I've disassembled many a motorcycle with not much
       | more than that.
        
         | Prcmaker wrote:
         | The emergency 10mm box used to available to purchase from a
         | couple chain stores in Australia. I bought a good few as gifts.
        
       | kortex wrote:
       | As a former chemist and all-around maker, I love this and this
       | bugs me all at once. I love the concept, but as others have
       | pointed out, this is less a "periodic table" and more "grab bag
       | of related things". You see these all over the place: foods,
       | drinks, cars, etc. All table, no periodicity. Why are wrenches
       | and drills strewn across three groups? Put the wrenches in one
       | group, drills in the other. Impact drivers somewhere in between.
       | 
       | There's some _vague_ grouping, but it 's pretty hodge podge.
       | 
       | The way _I_ would do it, is use electronegativity (tendency to
       | give or remove electrons) as a proxy for additive /subtractive.
       | Atomic weight is a proxy for actual weight/scale. Group I would
       | be like clay forming (the OG additive process), concrete, FDM,
       | SLS, injection molding, casting. Group II is a bit less additive,
       | more bonding: hot glue, soldering, brazing, welding. Halogens hog
       | out material: thermic lance, plasma cutter, laser, waterjet.
       | Chalcogens: hand router, (power) router, lathe, mill.
       | 
       | Metrology doesn't add or subtract, so obviously that's your Noble
       | group.
       | 
       | Transition metals are all the fasteners. Lanthanides/Actinides
       | are all the weirdos. I'd also add a group for just the simple
       | machines. I think it's more important to have groups,
       | periodicity, and trends, than sticking to the exact shape/size of
       | the periodic table of elements.
       | 
       | This is Theodore Gray too! Author of a bunch of books and posters
       | on chemistry.
       | 
       | Well, you know what they say, if you want something done right...
        
         | hoosieree wrote:
         | Inclined planes form a column. Unguided inclined planes:
         | knives, axes. Guided: planes, scissors. Inclined planes wrapped
         | around cylinders: drills, screws.
         | 
         | Blunt objects form a column: Hammers, presses, brakes.
         | 
         | I agree with your categorizations involving tools that rely on
         | heat, but I guess the problem with any such taxonomy is the
         | next person comes along and goes "well _I_ would do this
         | differently, and that... "
        
           | kortex wrote:
           | Obviously everyone has their own classification. But TFA
           | doesn't even distinct cutters from air pressure tools. I'd at
           | least make a group for Fluid Workers: air compressor, water
           | pump, hydraulic ram, hydraulic press.
        
         | croisillon wrote:
         | we definitely need a periodic table of periodic tables
        
           | AareyBaba wrote:
           | but would it contain itself ?
        
             | kortex wrote:
             | Obviously. It'd be one of the tables known to Harvard. Just
             | leave enough room for the ones to be discovered.
        
               | glompers wrote:
               | Every discovered table would contain items known to the
               | state of California to be oncogenic.
        
               | nealabq wrote:
               | This'd make a nice lyric. If only "Harvard" rhymed with
               | "discovered".
        
             | nealabq wrote:
             | you're suggesting a periodic table of all periodic tables
             | that do not contain themselves. sounds doable.
        
       | quickthrower2 wrote:
       | The micrometers (you need one for every 25mm, e.g. 0-25mm,
       | 25-50mm, 50-75mm, etc. is very interesting!).
        
       | vikmals wrote:
       | I feel like this could be better visualized in a tech tree.
        
       | NoMoreNicksLeft wrote:
       | I guess I was expecting things like the wheel, lever, and pulley.
        
       ___________________________________________________________________
       (page generated 2023-11-26 23:00 UTC)