[HN Gopher] Apertus - Open-Source Camera ___________________________________________________________________ Apertus - Open-Source Camera Author : kaladin-jasnah Score : 123 points Date : 2023-11-26 14:11 UTC (8 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.apertus.org) (TXT) w3m dump (www.apertus.org) | Kevcmk wrote: | With css this bad, I don't think I'm capable | jampekka wrote: | What's wrong with the CSS? The site seems to be HNed, but as | per archive.org the CSS is clearly better than most. | rafram wrote: | It's a bit Web 2.0core but functional enough. | capableweb wrote: | The style might be, but the CSS isn't, seems there is css | variables and flex usage, that's not web 2.0. | throwaway89201 wrote: | Site has been HNed. | | Github: https://github.com/apertus-open-source-cinema | ofrzeta wrote: | "open source and open hardware cinema camera" that is, so like | RED cam or something like it I guess. | theyinwhy wrote: | Red is neither open source nor open hardware. | stonogo wrote: | I believe the comparison was to the class of camera. I.e. | this is more for cinematography than photography | ensignavenger wrote: | I don't think RED is open source, is it? | RobotToaster wrote: | It's an interesting project, but EUR4k for a camera without | autofocus doesn't seem attractive. | luto wrote: | Professional cameras often do not have auto focus, compare to | some RED camera models. You either prepare your focus points | ahead of time or you work in teams, where your camera | assistants act as the "auto" focus. | rayrrr wrote: | Indeed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Focus_puller | pavlov wrote: | If it has a focus ring motor that's controllable via the API, | you could write your own autofocus algorithm. | sottol wrote: | Problem with any non-mass-produced camera seems currently the | availability of image sensors. It seems that the only small-batch | available sensors are for machine-vision and accordingly priced | :/ The CMV12000 used here costs $2000-$2200 per sensor - more | than many full-frame mirrorless cameras. | | Another problem is that there are no development boards as far as | I'm aware. That's why this imo could be huge for anyone else | interested in making an open camera, the apertus project seems to | have a modular architecture and breakout board for components! | | That said, the sensor does have a globoal shutter which would be | huge for cinema but not sure at what tradeoffs in dynamic range | or color-depth eg. | creer wrote: | Are broken full-frame cameras becoming available? Where large | sensors might be sourced from? I see quite a few sensors | available on ebay. Problem then might be getting specs. | immmmmm wrote: | For a global shutter sensor that big that seems kind of | reasonable. | | Been buying smaller sensors, building multi camera machines, | for researching projects and I like that thing. | | Open hardware, i wish I was doing cinema to buy that thing, | gorgeous! | dorfsmay wrote: | Do you write your software to use the small sensor from | scratch or do you build on top of existing libraries? | logtempo wrote: | You're correct, but if a company invest money in this project, | just like all big open-source projects, it can work. | twobitshifter wrote: | Here's another project using a more affordable full frame kodak | ccd with global shutter | | https://www.diyphotography.net/the-sitina-1-is-a-full-frame-... | | https://gitlab.com/zephray/sitina1 | | https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=Ma9FrN5COIo | | Some people like ccd better than cmos for the color range. | wilkomanger wrote: | Archive: | https://web.archive.org/web/20231126141132/https://www.apert... | evanjrowley wrote: | Archive Link: | https://web.archive.org/web/20231126153221/https://www.apert... | parimal7 wrote: | Back in 2019, I submitted a GSOC proposal for Apertus. They | wanted to add frame serving capability [1] to their RAW image | processing software OpenCine [2]. Even though my proposal was | rejected, I ended up learning a lot from their coding challenge | [3] which was mandatory for submitting a proposal. | | Reading research papers to understand Demosaicing [4], learning | C++ coding guidelines, RAW file format, code reviews and feedback | from Andrej and others at Apertus was really fun. At the time I | was still a sophomore at college so I asked and made a ton of | mistakes. Thanks Andrej [5] and team for being patient with so | many of us! :) | | [1] https://lab.apertus.org/T763 | | [2] https://www.apertus.org/en/opencine | | [3] https://lab.apertus.org/T872 | | [4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demosaicing | | [5] https://github.com/BAndiT1983 | photoGrant wrote: | Just far too expensive. I'm the exact target audience for this | thing, it's beyond scope financially. Create a barebones proof of | concept kit, but this is a non-starter solution for 70% of the | audience interested. | petabytes wrote: | Honestly it would make more sense to buy an old $300 Canon | camera, install Magic Lantern (or CHDK) | | Hate to say it, but in my experience open source hardware is | always been poor quality, unless it's a single board computer. | stonogo wrote: | This targets a different class of imaging. It is meant to | compete with equipment typically used to film movies, which | cost significantly more. | illwrks wrote: | Check out the CinePi, it's a raspberry pi based camera that's | being developed by several people: | | https://www.raspberrypi.com/news/cinepi-a-high-end-film-came... ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-11-26 23:00 UTC)