[HN Gopher] Cybertruck Launch ___________________________________________________________________ Cybertruck Launch Author : kaashmonee Score : 33 points Date : 2023-11-29 22:03 UTC (56 minutes ago) (HTM) web link (www.tesla.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.tesla.com) | NotYourLawyer wrote: | I'm still somewhat on the fence. But it's looking pretty good: | https://www.theautopian.com/i-saw-a-production-spec-tesla-cy... | frob wrote: | I would suggest exercising caution in using that article as a | guide post. The car the author is inspecting is literally the | model Tesla chose to put on the showroom floor in front of | customers and the general public. I'm sure they ensured it had | no major flaws. | xp84 wrote: | I'm rooting for it despite it being silly and not a practical | pickup, strictly because every car people are buying looks | identical (picture a crossover SUV from Toyota, Chevy, BMW etc. | Basically shoe-shaped things). | | This looks like a concept car that would never come to market. I | hope it sells really well and convinces others to bring actually- | creative designs to market. | fullshark wrote: | It will have a cult following at the very least I think, and | maybe that will inspire some auto companies. | ShakataGaNai wrote: | I'd wager you're right, similar to a modern DMC Delorean. | After all they already share the stainless-steel body and | "reputation for poor build quality and an unsatisfactory | driving experience". | notahacker wrote: | If it comes with a time machine you'll be able to pop to | the future to download its full self driving | capabilities... | Solvency wrote: | Tesla literally didn't realize the steel comes in coils and it | naturally wants to warp back into that state. Massive panel gap | problems. As usual. The only thing other car makers are | learning is what a joke their design operation is. | bastian wrote: | Sure guy. | qarl wrote: | "We dug our own grave." | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _Tesla literally didn 't realize the steel comes in coils | and it naturally wants to warp back into that state_ | | Steel comes in many shapes. Are you saying they used hot | versus cold-rolled steel? | convolvatron wrote: | stainless has a very strong tendency to want to walk back | from forming operations. | KaiserPro wrote: | It also has to be much thicker, or needs to be bonded to a | backing frame for rigidity. | ct520 wrote: | I appreciate your thinking, unfortunately if it sells well I | feel the industry will just do the same thing. Instead of shoe | shaped things, we will just have cyber truck knock offs. Which | ugh I can't say I would prefer over what we have now. | sushid wrote: | While I appreciate the unique design of the Cybertruck, I have | a huge concern with its huge size and the potential safety | risks for pedestrians. | | The trend of increasingly larger vehicles, like SUVs and | trucks, has already raised issues regarding pedestrian safety. | The Cybertruck, being notably larger than most contemporary | cars in the same category, could exacerbate this problem, | especially if it opens the door to similar designs in new | market segments IMO. | bryanlarsen wrote: | It _should_ be safer than a normal truck to pedestrians, | since it doesn 't have a broad front. With a car, the most | common scenario is that car hits your legs and then you | bounce on the hood. IOW, you don't get the full kinetic | energy all at once. With a truck your body takes the full hit | and you're more likely to fall under the tires. | | With a lower, sharper front, the Cybertruck should behave | more like a car than a full size truck. | | But we really don't know yet. It's a real failure of | regulators that we it's not a standard part of testing and | that their aren't good standards in this area. | mike_d wrote: | It is the single biggest step backwards in automotive | safety in the last ten years. | | https://www.travelers.com/resources/auto/safe-driving/how- | cr... | slowhadoken wrote: | yeah but automotive safety has been great the last twenty | years especially for children | mike_d wrote: | It really has, cars have gotten progressively safer every | year since 1975 for everyone involved. | https://www.iihs.org/topics/fatality- | statistics/detail/child... | dgfitz wrote: | Your complaint about trucks is misguided [1] and should | instead lie with passenger cars until such time as passenger | cars are not the leading cause of pedestrian deaths by | vehicle type. | | [1] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1730245/ | amenhotep wrote: | This says that light trucks are 1.45 times likelier to kill | a person per mile driven than cars. | avidiax wrote: | The Cybertruck is actually rather low for a truck. The edge | of the hood would hit a typical person in the gut, not the | neck or face as with many other trucks (especially lifted | trucks). | | https://www.cybertruckownersclub.com/forum/threads/model- | s-v... | quartz wrote: | Agreed-- this is an absolutely ridiculous looking vehicle and I | hope they sell millions of them. | mike_d wrote: | > because every car people are buying looks identical | | It is almost like all other car makers know something Tesla | does not. Maybe that big reflective flat surfaces are not safe | for other drivers on sunny days. | mavhc wrote: | They're not flat surfaces | KaiserPro wrote: | or that flat surfaces aren't very strong, require more | material to be rigid and generally have bad aerodynamics. | inhumantsar wrote: | I couldn't agree more. Especially [Hyundai's recent sports car | concept](https://www.hyundai-n.com/en/models/rolling- | lab/n-vision-74....) | JohnFen wrote: | I just wish it weren't so hideous-looking. The car industry | already went through a "make everything ugly" phase a couple of | decades ago. It'd be nice if they didn't repeat that! | CobrastanJorji wrote: | That's pretty much how I would feel for this or for the Homer | Car. Is either one a good idea? Probably not, no. But it's fun | to see different things, and trying new stuff is how we learn | and grow, even when we do it because the CEO or his brother is | making bad decisions. | rob74 wrote: | The shoe-shaped things are that way because of crumple areas | and pedestrian safety requirements (if the car hits a | pedestrian, the bonnet is supposed to deform in order to | minimize injuries). Contrast that to the Cybertruck, which... | | > _...has received criticism from automotive safety groups, | including the Australasian New Car Assessment Program and the | Euro NCAP, for not conforming to standards for pedestrian and | cyclist safety. In its December 2019 form, the truck would | likely not be street-legal in either Australia or the European | Union._ | | Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Cybertruck | thinkingemote wrote: | We are still in the motor cars looking like horse drawn | carriages without the horses phase. | | Electric cars don't need ICE engine layouts. It will take a few | years until the designers realise they can have cars looking | much different as they have more flexibility. | | I also have hope this truck on the roads will get manufacturers | doing something different. Concept cars at car shows should be | where we should look first. | huytersd wrote: | It would be so easy to make this a practical pickup. I could | get past the fact that it looks terrible in person if it had a | usable truck bed. But the bed is so small and constrained that | is basically useless | Syonyk wrote: | > _...because every car people are buying looks identical..._ | | Why _wouldn 't_ you expect this sort of convergence? A bunch of | companies trying to solve the same problems with the same | constraints are likely to find very similar solutions. We saw | it with aviation - over time, jet aircraft look more and more | like each other, because certain solutions, once they become | available (twinjets demonstrating enough reliability for | extended overwater operations) are _simply better_ in about | every metric you 'd possibly care about. | datadrivenangel wrote: | I'm amazed that they actually made it happen! | | Hopefully this gets us more cool car designs. | whalesalad wrote: | My biggest gripe is the wheel covers. They make this look like a | ridiculous Robocop movie prop. | slowhadoken wrote: | weird, that's my favorite thing. I like old RoboCop movies | though. | ModernMech wrote: | I'm pretty sure that's the whole point of them. | ftufek wrote: | I've been seeing a bunch of them in Bay Area, I thought it was | already launched and started deliveries. In person, it looks like | something out of a movie set. | fermentation wrote: | Sure looks dangerous for pedestrians | thedaly wrote: | No more or less than any other vehicle of similar weight. | discordance wrote: | The thing weighs 8000 to 10000 lb (3629 to 4536 kg). | | That's shockingly heavy to move around 200lbs meat sacks. | mike_d wrote: | Most EVs weigh about that much, to the point that some | cities are considering amending "No trucks" signs to also | say no EVs. | majormajor wrote: | Do they? Model X weighs 5600lbs, here - | https://www.caranddriver.com/tesla/model-x - and that's | bigger than any of the other, more popular, Teslas other | than the Cybertruck. | | Far cry from 8-10000. Or even 7-8000. | JumpCrisscross wrote: | > _8000 to 10000 lb_ | | It has to be 6,500+ for the 179 deduction [1]. | | [1] https://www.crestcapital.com/section-179-deduction- | vehicle-l... | Kirby64 wrote: | Citation needed. It's expected to be around 7k lbs, over 8k | would put it in the hummer EV territory. | EwanToo wrote: | Twice the weight of the Tesla model 3 which is 1800kg, it's | pretty extreme. | | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla_Model_3 | thedaly wrote: | It does not weigh 8000 to 10000 pounds. It is listed | between 6500 and 7000. | slowhadoken wrote: | A 2024 Ford F-150 weights more. | dzlobin wrote: | > vehicle of similar weight | | All...one of them: https://www.usatoday.com/picture- | gallery/money/cars/2019/10/... | thedaly wrote: | Your link lists 6 trucks that are heavier than the 6,670 | Ibs two motor version of the cybertruck. | sangnoir wrote: | This is not true - there are other factors at play. The angle | of the bumper and _where_ the bumper comes into contact with | a human matters a lot - if it is below the human 's center of | mass, they are much less likely to be thrown under the | vehicle and run over. | panick21_ wrote: | Yes. But it seems actually less dangerous then other pickups. | | Other pickups seem to think that having as high as possible as | big as possible vehicle front is a great thing. | | Going OVER the car is what saves live. If you get hit by a | F-150 it more like getting hit by a wall. | | The Cybertruck also seems to have better visibility. | | So this seems to me to be a case of 'In the land of the blind, | the one-eyed man is king'. | | In general US obsessions with pickups is stupid and I hope in | my country all of them are commercial license only, not allowed | on common parking spaces, ban in certain section of cities, | plus very high licensing cost. | jeltz wrote: | And other cars due to the weight. | slowhadoken wrote: | I've always avoided heavy stuff moving at high velocity but hey | that's just me. | 1970-01-01 wrote: | Safe public roads haven't existed since 1900. | andy_xor_andrew wrote: | If it is a great car, but flops because it looks weird, that's a | shame. | | If it's a terribly-built car, with reliability issues, and a | super difficult production cycle, that's a shame, but for a | different reason: you'd think after the snafu over the Model X, | where certain features (the X-wing doors) were a production | nightmare and ballooned the cost and tanked the reliability, they | wouldn't make the same mistake again. But if that is the case | here, then they did make the same mistake, but even bigger and | with worse consequences. | | But ignoring all that, at least it's different, and I'm rooting | for its success. If it fails, though, most likely Tesla will only | have themselves to blame. | wnevets wrote: | does it have sub 10-micron accuracy? | slowhadoken wrote: | Prediction: if it does poorly people will call Musk a failure. If | it does well people will call Musk a grifter. Either way people | will be salty. | ramesh31 wrote: | I understand the nostalgia for those rock solid steel bumpered | behemoths people used to drive. Knocking your bumper on the curb | and shelling out a few grand for some plastic sucks. But think | just for a moment about how the physics of that equation work | out. There's 3 tons of rolling steel coming to a stop, and | something's gotta give. It's either the car, or you. | | Best of luck to anyone who drives ones of these. I'll be | interested to see the NHTSA results. | bilsbie wrote: | I'm buying one because I was born too late to own a delorean. | 1970-01-01 wrote: | These launch countdowns are silly. Yes, you're going to be really | cool the first year or so with that Cybertruck. But after you go | to a party and five other people have one, (1,000,000+ | reservations since 2019) it'll seem much less alluring. | MaximilianEmel wrote: | The main thing I really dislike is the lack of buttons and dials. | It looks to be just a single touchscreen in the center for | _everything_. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-11-29 23:00 UTC)