[HN Gopher] Three gaming-focused Linux operating systems beat Wi... ___________________________________________________________________ Three gaming-focused Linux operating systems beat Windows 11 in gaming benchmark Author : Ardms78 Score : 48 points Date : 2023-12-03 21:11 UTC (1 hours ago) (HTM) web link (www.tomshardware.com) (TXT) w3m dump (www.tomshardware.com) | FirmwareBurner wrote: | 1. Why not link the original article[1] with the benchmarks and | use your favorite way to translate? | | 2. Curious why they didn't use OG Ubuntu in the benchmarks. Yes | Popos(I still don't agree on that name) is just another Ubuntu, | but I would have proffered the OG snice that's the most popular | worldwide and I don't know what Popos does to make it more | "gaming focused" than vanilla Ubuntu. | | For another popular Ubuntu alternative they could have also went | with Linux Mint. AFAIK both are still default on X11 while latest | Ubuntu defaults to Wayland so that could have made a difference. | | [1] https://www.computerbase.de/2023-12/welche-linux- | distributio... | smoldesu wrote: | > I don't know what Popos does to make it more "gaming focused" | than vanilla Ubuntu. | | They have a few changes, chief among them being the PopOS | scheduler which I find to be quite effective: | https://github.com/pop-os/system76-scheduler | | The desktop itself is a weird custom-baked x11/GNOME | customization you won't really get on Ubuntu. Not many | distributions can claim the title of being truly "unique", but | PopOS _does_ deserve the title in my opinion. Even still it | wouldn 't be my choice for gaming, but I'll defend it's | identity as something more than another GNOME/Debian spin. | FirmwareBurner wrote: | _> Not many distributions can claim the title of being truly | "unique"_ | | Sir, I think you've just insulted like dozens of distros out | there. | | IMHO there are a lot of more "truly unique" distros out there | than just spins of Ubuntu with a different DE and scheduler: | Nobara(from the benchmark), Q4OS, Antix, Mabox, Linux Lite, | Gecko Linux, Spiral Linux, in no particular order, not that | they're better than Popos, but they're definitely more | unique. | smoldesu wrote: | Probably so. Relative to PopOS, not many of them are quite | as pre-customized (not that it's an inherently good or bad | thing). | FirmwareBurner wrote: | Depends. Personally I don't consider Popos's DE to be a | feature but more of a bug. I think the two competing | giants, KDE and Gnome, are more solid and see more dev | time and effort put into them, and will do just fine to | satisfy all users, preferences and use cases, I don't see | the need for the Nth+1 DE that fixes problems Gnome & KDE | don't have. But that's just my opinion. | jwells89 wrote: | I think the thing that makes popOS relevant to gaming is how | system76 offers a variant with proprietary Nvidia drivers baked | in and properly configured to not break with updates. | FirmwareBurner wrote: | That's a good point. | brnt wrote: | That's precisely what Ubuntu (and Debian) offer with the | nvidia driver from their repos, isn't it? | ianai wrote: | Pop_OS! Arch, and Nobara | kiwijamo wrote: | I find it interesting that Arch is considered a gaming-focus | Linux distro. Is that really the case? From my experience, I've | see Arch as a general-purpose bleeding-edge distro. | Hamuko wrote: | Steam Deck runs Arch. | charcircuit wrote: | No, it runs SteamOS. Else Pop_OS! is Ubuntu and Nobara is | Fedora. | calamari4065 wrote: | >Pop_OS! is Ubuntu and Nobara is Fedora. | | Correct. | calamari4065 wrote: | Both of my main computers are over a decade old. 3rd gen i5, | and my laptop runs an Nvidia NVS5400m. Absolutely prehistoric | hardware. | | Arch is the only distro I've tried that just works out of the | box. It's the only distro where Optimus/Prime/Bumblebee | actually works and doesn't just run the GPU at full bore all | the time. | | All of my games work as well as you could hope with this | hardware, with no configuration or tinkering up front. | | Arch has been the absolute most stable and fast OS I have | ever used, bar none. My current installation is the longest | I've ever gone without reinstalling the OS, including | windows. It's definitely not the most ergonomic OS, but it | just works, and it works every time. | | Specifically, I use the Garuda flavor. It's advertised as | being specifically for games, but I don't know what's special | about it other than the garish "gamer" RGB default desktop | theme. I'm gonna try Cinnamon next. | charcircuit wrote: | >had a substantially larger 17 fps gap | | A gap of FPS has no meaning. FPS have to be compared with | percentage difference. If you want to measure a gap in absolute | terms you need to convert the measurements to milliseconds per | frame. | qayxc wrote: | The original source features a frametime-based rating as well. | Surprise, surprise, Windows 11 and Arch are both identical in | terms of performance, while Pop!OS and Nobara are about 9% | behind. | 0xDEADFED5 wrote: | they really doubled down on that Vavle typo, haha | silisili wrote: | Six times they misspelled Valve, once even in the subtitle. | Once I could see as poor editing, but this seems egregious. | FirmwareBurner wrote: | Or the editor mistakenly added "Vavel" to their | autocorrect/spell-checker as the correct spelling, and hit | 'Publish' without proof reading thoroughly. | SV_BubbleTime wrote: | "Add to dictionary" shouldn't be taken lightly. | jzb wrote: | "Arch is the most 'Linux-like' of the three" | | Say what? Not sure how the other two are any less "Linux-like" | than Arch. They're all Linux, which is about as Linux-like as it | gets. | zamalek wrote: | This should get even better with the new Wayland WINE stuff | (freshly stable apparently, I haven't tried it yet). ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-12-03 23:00 UTC)