[HN Gopher] Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers ___________________________________________________________________ Tesla shares 48V architecture with other automakers Author : toomuchtodo Score : 112 points Date : 2023-12-07 15:10 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (electrek.co) (TXT) w3m dump (electrek.co) | sitkack wrote: | TIL that 42V fizzled out | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/42-volt_electrical_system | | I welcome the move to 48V, as one gets lots of cross over | synergies from the 48V telco standard. | | https://www.servertech.com/blog/48vdc-power-and-the-backbone... | | https://www.st.com/content/dam/AME/2019/developers-conferenc... | | https://www.maximintegrated.com/content/dam/files/products/p... | | https://www.infineon.com/cms/en/applications/information-com... | mccoyc wrote: | Agreed. 48V (actually -48V) has been used across telco central | offices for decades. | kurthr wrote: | It's a really nice voltage with lots of support for batteries | and up/dn conversion hardware. | | It's also right at the edge of what is human safe. You can | burn yourself and blow up cables, but it's very difficult to | electrocute yourself (afib or muscle seize) without lots of | wet contact. | | https://incompliancemag.com/article/experiments-of-dc- | human-... | jacquesm wrote: | Indeed, I'm aware of only one recorded death by | electrocution at 48V, iirc it was a Swiss radio amateur | that had done a bunch of gardening sat down sweaty in a | metallic chair and reached for the one switch of his set. | Probably there were other contributory causes as well, I've | been zapped multiple times from much higher voltage sources | (that could have easily supplied the power required) and | lived. | | I can't find a reference for that Swiss case though. I'll | keep looking. | firebat45 wrote: | How exactly do you define a negative voltage unless you are | using some other voltage as a reference? | dragontamer wrote: | Label the power pin+ GND and the power pin- becomes -48V | | Voltages are all relative. It's like saying 'How do you get | a height difference of 10 feet by digging?' | | Well, you dig and then label the initial level as +10 feet, | and redefine the bottom of your hole to be ground. | Kirby64 wrote: | No. In telco, the -48V is referenced against ground, like | the physical ground. If you're isolated, you can do this. | but they would still need to be referencing the 'ground' | to something ... likely the negative side of the main | battery pack. | | The reason why -48V is used is because it is provided as | a bias voltage to give wiring cathodic protection, to | prevent corrosion of telecom infrastructure. If you used | 48V, it would not work. You need a negative voltage | referenced against ground. | applied_heat wrote: | Ground positive terminal of battery string instead of | grounding negative terminal. | | I see this more often on European stuff | bluGill wrote: | Generally with respect to ground. There are many good | reasons to connect your power system to ground and so this | is commonly done. (there are pros and cons to connecting to | ground, but it gets complex fast) | myself248 wrote: | It is with respect to ground, the positive pole of the | battery is connected to ground. | | The telegraph system figured this out very quickly. Most | water in nature has at least a bit of salt in it, which is | present as positive sodium ions and negative chloride ions. | By making the outdoor wiring negative with respect to | ground, the chloride ions are repelled, and such wires | corrode much more slowly than those that're positive with | respect to ground. | | Since most of the telegraph network, later the telephone | network, is outdoors, this is a pretty big deal. | thebruce87m wrote: | > that're | | First time I've ever seen this typed | hinkley wrote: | What're you talking about? | denysvitali wrote: | I guess he refers to the shortening of "that are" into | that're | magicalhippo wrote: | It's a matter of perspective. | | You tie one of the leads to earth (literally grounding | it)[1], leaving the other non-grounded. Depending on if you | tie the negative or the positive lead to ground, you get | 48V or -48V with respect to ground. As long as the | potential between the most positive lead and the least | positive lead is 48V, the circuit itself doesn't care. | | As mentioned here[2], the reason for grounding the positive | lead is to prevent galvanic corrosion[3] destroying the | buried copper. | | [1]: https://www.bicsi.org/docs/default-source/conference- | present... | | [2]: https://www.poweringthenetwork.com/uncategorized/negat | ive-48... | | [3]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galvanic_corrosion | hinkley wrote: | Apparently in cars it's weirder. Wire it one way and the | wiring corrodes. Go the other way and the body corrodes. | bloggie wrote: | Voltage is a measure of charge difference so there must | always be a reference, usually the reference is 0 V. | londons_explore wrote: | I don't think they'll be able to use much of that with their | 48v PoE ethernet standard... | SigmundA wrote: | As mentioned in the 42v article they went with that due to 48v | nominal being too close to 60v max on alternator/fully charged | which is the limit shock hazard. | | Not sure what chemistry/cell count will be for the 48v battery | (which I assume it has) but 48v could mean 13s - 16s packs. | pupppet wrote: | Do more stuff like this, Elon. I really don't like not liking | you. | r3d0c wrote: | weird comment... maybe we shouldn't feel the need to idolize | humans... | flappyeagle wrote: | It's ok to like people | rnk wrote: | We humans are all terrible on some level (except my mom, she | was a saint), but if you have enormous power, you can help or | hurt a lot of people based on your actions. Musk has a lot of | power. He must be a terribly lonely person, not knowing if he | can trust anyone or they just want something from him. | firebat45 wrote: | Nobody knows if they can trust anyone, not just rich | people. | argiopetech wrote: | Right, but it's a lot easier when you don't have anything | someone else might want, much less a billion or more | things. | davidcbc wrote: | He could give away 99.99% of his wealth, still never have | to work another day in his life, and be much less of a | target if he wanted to. Boo hoo the poor guy who has more | money than almost anyone has ever had in the history of | the earth has problems | bluGill wrote: | True, but it isn't worth a thief's time to steal things | from me, so I'm less a target of dishonest people. Not | zero target, but not a big target. Rich people because | they have money are a larger target. Nobody would seek to | marry me for my money - filing for divorce as soon as | enough time has past to make it look like that wasn't | their goal - a small number of people would do that and | they seek out rich people. | SilverBirch wrote: | Hi, excuse me. Just want to say, don't appreciate you | rounding me up with the anti-semites. "We humans". No - | those anti-semites, and us reasonable people. Wouldn't like | to mix with them thanks. You can make whatever excuses you | want for him, but that's what they are, excuses. | itishappy wrote: | Is "he's not doing enough cool stuff" really the root of your | dislike of Elon? | jandrese wrote: | Don't worry, it will only be a matter of time before he | retweets a neo-Nazi and you can go back to hating him. | | Some people have way too binary a view of other people. In real | life there are rarely outright villains or complete saints. | Everybody is a mix of greys. You don't have to agree with | _everything_ a person does or says to appreciate their work. | pupppet wrote: | Retweeting neo-nazi content is no shade of grey. | intrepidhero wrote: | Why would a car need a 48V system for accessories? In general the | things a car's 12V system powers have gotten less power hungry | over time (LED's, heat pump) and in particular, an EV loses the | highest power electrical device on the 12V bus, the starter. The | typical equipment used for the entertainment and control systems | are going to be much more available with 12V supplies, just | because that's the industry standard. | | Obviously the traction system is using much, much higher | voltages. | | The article cites "complexity" of the wiring harnesses, which is | nonsense. The wires might get a little smaller, but not by a lot. | Like I said, the 12V bus in an EV isn't driving a bunch of high | power stuff. (Is it? Am I missing something?) | | The one place I can imagine it helping is for driving inverters | so you can provide AC outlets for laptops, power tools, etc. | pgeorgi wrote: | https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bordnetz#48-Volt-Bordnetz_im_A... | explains (a bit) why German car makers are using 48V since | ~2016 (in addition to the still existing 12V system, which | seems to be the difference with Tesla, which went 48V-only). | | DeepL translation: | | The 12 V electrical system can barely cover the power | consumption that modern vehicles need for their comfort | systems. The "static" consumers completely overload the | alternator, which provides up to 3 kW of power, especially at | low temperatures.[12] The battery power is not sufficient for | additional dynamic consumers, such as powerful electrically | driven compressors.[13] | | For this reason, a proposal was made at the end of the 1990s to | install a 14 V/42 V electrical system in motor vehicles.[14] | From 2001, Japanese manufacturers and General Motors launched | hybrid vehicles with this electrical system on the market.[15] | Although Daimler-Chrysler was one of the co-initiators of this | concept, it was not used in Germany. One reason for this was | that it did not appear possible to demonstrate a corresponding | utility value to customers for the necessary additional | price[14]. | | Instead, since 2010, German car manufacturers have favoured the | solution of providing a second 48 V electrical system to | supplement the 12 V system.[9] Since 2016, the first series | applications of 48 V electrical system components have been the | operation of the electric compressor and the electromechanical | roll stabilization in the Audi SQ7 4.0 TDI and Bentley | Bentayga. Both are based on the same platform. | | Translated with DeepL.com (free version) | intrepidhero wrote: | A split 48/12 system makes a lot more sense. Run the | heater/heat pump, power steering, coolant pump, etc on 48V | and keep entertainment and controls on 12V. | bryanlarsen wrote: | Computer chips use ~1.5V or so these days. Why go | 48V->12V->1.5V when you can go 48V->1.5V directly? If it's | more efficient to use an intermediate voltage, you can | choose the most efficient intermediate voltage internally | rather than using 12V. | bluGill wrote: | There is a lot of off the shelf 12V equipment you can | buy. Plus even more that is sitting in garages ready to | be installed in the next vehicle. Cars are manufactured | in enough quantity that it would only cost $0.01 per | vehicle to design it (plus parts costs which are probably | the same), but that is still a few million to the bottom | line if they use the same 12 volt radio. Add to that that | ICE cars everywhere have 12 volt starters, and you can | buy 12 volt jump start kits: when (not if!) a battery | fails to start the ICE you better be able to jump start | it from a 12 volt battery - this is a safety issue. | | Tesla doesn't have ICEs, so the safety concerns are lost | on them. Thus all 48 volt makes some sense. They still | need something for all the accessories people have. | taylodl wrote: | Because we already have the 12V infrastructure and part | supplies in place. You're disrupting things for no | benefit. We've been running split 24V/12V systems for | decades now in automotive applications. It's not that big | a deal to change that to 48V/12V systems as many European | car manufacturers have done. | bryanlarsen wrote: | No benefit? I've seen estimates of $1000 in reduced cost | due to reduced copper wiring, and more importantly the | labor required to string that wiring. | | Modern phones charge on 48V these days, so 48V parts are | extremely common & cheap. | pgeorgi wrote: | I'd fully expect other car makers to move to an exclusive | 48V setup at some point. They just do it gradually: For | the new model a part is replaced by its next-gen | successor that is incompatible anyway? Put it on the 48V | bus. Repeat until the 12V system is done away with - or | force the issue when there are only a few components | left, or downstep the 48V to 12V right in front of them, | once that's cheaper than keeping the remaining 12V | system. | bryanlarsen wrote: | It'd be cheaper to delete the 12V bus entirely and add | 48V -> 12V converters in front of legacy components, even | if they needed several dozen of those converters. | panick21_ wrote: | I expect Tesla to still have a few components like that | in the car. | jabl wrote: | > I've seen estimates of $1000 in reduced cost due to | reduced copper wiring | | What about aluminum wiring? Lighter, cheaper, though | bulkier than equivalent copper. Aluminum wiring got a bad | rep back in the day, but it seems with current electrical | aluminum standards it supposedly works pretty well. | atoav wrote: | In sotuations where it is about space you wouldn't choose | aluminum. Also afaik most automotive wiring that is | certified is copper. Going from copper to aluminum means | you will have to put bigger crossections in. This is more | weight and more space. | taylodl wrote: | What you may have saved on wiring is going to be offset | by the increased cost of the battery (I'm seeing 2x-3x | cost) and the fact you now need a much beefier alternator | which is going to have its own cost. | | You'd think if it were a slam dunk then the bean counters | would have insisted on a transition to 48V years ago. | jandrese wrote: | Total current consumption should be about the same (or | even less, thanks to lower losses at 48v), so I'm not | sure why would you would need a "much beefier" | alternator. It will need different windings, but overall | it should be about the same size and cost. | Kirby64 wrote: | What modern phone charges at 48V? I'm not aware of any | that charge at even 20V, outside of a couple of gimmick | devices. No Samsung or Apple phone charges at anywhere | close to that, that's for sure. | smileysteve wrote: | What modern phone charges at 12v? | | Most phones charge at 5v. Modern USB-C chargers can | charge between 5v and 20v based on configuration. | | Buck converts and regulators are cheap and small these | days. | nikau wrote: | Most phones charge higher than 5 volts these days | SkyPuncher wrote: | You can run smaller wires through the vehicle then down voltage | on device. | CamperBob2 wrote: | _Like I said, the 12V bus in an EV isn 't driving a bunch of | high power stuff._ | | Take a look at the fusebox in any modern car, EV or not. (There | will most likely be more than one fusebox.) | | You'll see lots of 20A, 30A, 40A parts, some even larger. | Running those circuits on 12 volts takes more copper than you | probably think it does. More copper and beefier (read: _much_ | more expensive) connectors. The move to 48V is frankly overdue. | rnk wrote: | Just to add the basic idea, the amount of power is amps * | volts. So to carry the same amount of energy with a higher | voltage, you can you use less amps. The amount of amps impacts | how big the wires are, lower amps need smaller wires and that | means less space for wires but more importantly less weight of | the wires. There is a lot of wiring in a car. Tesla claims this | could be 1/4 the amount of copper wiring in an article, below. | | This article describes a bit about this, but also says | something I never heard, that there were 6v auto systems in the | 1960s. https://www.mining.com/new-tesla-low-voltage-system-a- | big-de... | bluGill wrote: | 6 volt autos were going out of style in the 1950s. They did | last into the 1960s, but they were already rare by then. | bokohut wrote: | It may help some also to know what an amp actually is: | 6.241x10^18 protons or electrons per 1 second of time passing | a certain point. A single Amp is equal to 1 Coulomb and 1 | Coulomb has 1 Joule of energy. I share this from my personal | documentation in comprehension of understanding the unseen | resulting from a device I am building to solve a personal | energy storage problem. All open knowledge certainly but | graphing these relationships into a visual depiction of the | correlation has greatly assisted when talking to others that | have ZERO knowledge about energy and power. Humans are nearly | all 100% visual so explaining it with pictures presents A LOT | of AHA moments for those without such comprehension. | | The inverse relationship between amps and volts can also | help: 50 volts * 24 Amps = 1200 Watts 100 Volts * 12 Amps = | 1200 Watts 120 Volts * 10 Amps = 1200 Watts 150 Volts * 8 | Amps = 1200 Watts 200 Volts * 6 Amps = 1200 Watts 240 Volts * | 5 Amps = 1200 Watts 360 Volts * 3.333 Amps = 1200 Watts 480 | Volts * 2.5 Amps = 1200 Watts 600 Volts * 2 Amps = 1200 Watts | | Stay Healthy! | jabart wrote: | Power steering pumps are electric and have one of the largest | wires in my truck. With an EV you also have a heat pump, maybe | a heater, coolant pumps now that you don't a constant spinning | pulley, windows, lights, headlamps, power doors, seats, radio, | amplifier, small PC, etc. | | From the article "Switching to 48V architecture alleviates a | huge number of challenges automakers are facing with 12V. The | biggest one, though, is complexity: You need far less complex | wiring harnesses to power all your vehicle systems" | | My take is that 12v requires almost a dedicated power line for | each part, while a 48v could run to a bus line that gets | tapped. 48v might be something that divides easier with the | battery pack, and drops the 12v battery. | intrepidhero wrote: | I hadn't connected the dots that all the various pumps (and | fans) have to switch from mechanically connected to the | engine via the accessory belt to electrically driven. That's | a fair point. | smileysteve wrote: | It has been optimal to run accessories electrically for ICE | already for several reasons. It has been difficult based on | some of the loads on a 12v battery (agm has really helped | this) | | - Start stop is smoother (and more available) without | accessories | | - Cooling a turbo after the motor is off - true for the | engine as well, heat soak on water pump off can go ~20f | over the thermostat | | - Brake Boosting without a vacuum (Valvetronic or Hybrid) | | - Air Conditioning at idle | fasteddie31003 wrote: | Anything drawing over 250 watts is going to need over 12 gauge | wire. I put a 2200 watt inverter in my truck and I needed to | put 4/0 gauge cables to it which are huge. 48v would mean I | could have gotten away with only 8 gauge wire. | adolph wrote: | Here is an explainer: | | https://youtu.be/ky1Z2klPalw?t=573 | | Transcript: | | _. . . a little bit about electrical electrical engineering um | you don 't need to know a lot but just a little bit uh we'll | understand that you actually want a higher voltage in order to | reduce the resistance losses._ | | _So the heating in any wire is the current is the square of | the current. So if you 're trying to get a particular power | rating through then as you increase the voltage you can | decrease the current. Voltage times amperage equals your power. | To hold power constant, the heating is is proportionate to the | square of the current. So you want to raise the voltage in | order to lower the current thus lower the heating in the wire._ | | _And the net effect being that you can have much thinner | wires, then as you raise the voltage you can you can drop the | the the thickness of the wires. You can have much you can use | much less, in a nutshell. You can use much less copper and the | wire harness weighs much less as you raised the voltage._ | martythemaniak wrote: | The savings in terms of weight and efficiency are actually | significant. This was covered in Tesla's investor day | presentation earlier in the year: | | The section on electronic architecture (~10min): | https://www.youtube.com/live/Hl1zEzVUV7w?si=-Vz0gKT5YDbtrG9V... | | The sub section (~4min) on 48V in particular: | https://www.youtube.com/live/Hl1zEzVUV7w?si=shfI2vEz9taTLSm7... | londons_explore wrote: | Some devices in a car are still pretty power hungry. Eg. The | blower motor for the fan (typically 800 watts = 70 amps @12v). | Heated rear screen (240 watts = 20 amps). Window motors are | pretty powerful too. | | End result is you need a lot of fairly chunky cables to power | those things. | | And the price of copper has been steadily climbing since 1960 - | unlike other commodities which have been getting easier and | easier to extract with more automation in mines. | londons_explore wrote: | Most MOSFETS are 50 volt rated. 50 volts is a sweet spot for | switching the most powerful load with the smallest and cheapest | switch. | KaiserPro wrote: | if you're switching 48v, you'd want a mosfet rated for way | more than 50v. On a car you'd want 200% headroom at least. | mauvehaus wrote: | Not that anyone is going to stick a plow on a Cybertruck, but | holy shit is the hydraulic pump on one of those a huge current | draw. It's 4AWG wire on mine. The battery is kind of | marginal[0] and when I raise the plow, the volt meter goes down | to 7-8 volts if the engine's at idle and the alternator can't | supply the needed current. Gunning the engine improves the | situation somewhat, but wow, was that an eye opener. | | [0] _Everything_ on that truck is kind of marginal, actually. | If you aren 't plowing for money, plow truck is the last stop | before the big parking lot in the sky. | bryanlarsen wrote: | Most of the residential snow clearing outfits around me use | plows and blowers on Kubota tractors. Probably part of the | reason is so that can use PTO hydraulics... | bluGill wrote: | There are pros and cons. Snow plows beat on a the vehicle - | which is why plows are the last thing a truck does before | you quit using it. Highway departments will use a dump | truck mounted plow because the frame of the dump truck can | take the beating (that they can put salt on the dump truck | is a very useful side effect). Tractors are designed to | pull plows through dirt which also beats on them, and so | tractors can stand up to snow plows better than a truck. | However tractors are slower and so cannot work for on road | work. PTO and hydraulics are useful as well. | Filligree wrote: | You don't use custom-designed vehicles? I'm used to | snowplows being these massive, reinforced vehicles that | look like they could take on a tank. | mauvehaus wrote: | I haven't a clue what you're describing. Do you have a | picture? Also: where do you live, and how much snow do | you get?! | bryanlarsen wrote: | In the case of the cybertruck, the windshield wiper motor to | drive that massive 4 foot wiper blade is 5hp and would require | 300 amps at 12V. That's larger than a starter motor. | bluGill wrote: | Larger in what way? A starter can draw more than 300 amps in | some cases. However a starter only needs to run for a few | seconds and then get plenty of time to cool off. You can burn | out a starter if you crank the engine for too long. By | contrast a windshield wipers needs to run for hours when you | are driving in the rain, and thus needs to be larger to | dissipate all the heat. (starters are also typically series | wound DC motors which are also smaller, they work great for | starters but not for most other motor applications) | PinguTS wrote: | What many people underestimate is all the comfort stuff we have | and use in modern vehicles. Most of the utilizes some sort of | electric drive. Any electric drive requires power: * Power | sliding windows * Power seats * Electric trunk * Power sliding | roof * Electric mirrors | | Also other stuff: * heated back window * heated front window * | heated seats * heated steering wheel | | Also the lights, even when they are LED they still draw a lot | of power: * front lights, * back lights. * surrounding lights * | comfort lights | | That is just of few devices. Just look into all the comfort in | a modern (luxury) vehicle. | panick21_ wrote: | There is a lot more. There is a huge amount of safty | equipment and sensors in modern car. That stuff that is not | seen but its there as well. | tshaddox wrote: | > Why would a car need a 48V system for accessories? In general | the things a car's 12V system powers have gotten less power | hungry over time | | It's not primarily about delivering more power, is it? I | thought the point of higher voltage is that _for a given power_ | the wires can be smaller. | bluGill wrote: | It can be both. Higher voltage allows longer small wires, | and/or more power on the same wires. Depends on what the car | needs. If it is just a few lights on the back of the car you | are looking for smaller/cheaper wires. However if you are | looking to put something power hungry in back (work trucks | have a lot of needs around this) the higher voltage allows | the same wires to deliver more power. | myself248 wrote: | Hi, automotive electrical is my job. | | There's quite a bit of very thick wiring in a car, not just the | starter wire, but boring stuff like audio amplifiers, rear | window defrosters, power seat motors. Those things don't draw a | ton of power, like maybe just a few hundred watts, but at 12 | volts even modest powers require extraordinarily thick wires, | especially when you account for bundle derating. | | This requires large terminals, which requires larger | connectors, and there's the complexity, because MOST of the | wiring in the car is just signals, or low-power stuff, which | can run over thin wires and small terminals. (Minimum size is | limited by mechanical durability rather than electrical | conductivity.) Making a "hybrid" connector that has a couple | large cavities for large terminals, and a bunch of small | cavities for small terminals, is a pain. Having separate | connectors for heavy power and for signals introduces more | assembly work and negatively impacts testability. The wires | have different stiffness and bend behaviors, they exert | different amounts of force on weather seals, they have to be | terminated on different machines at different points in the | assembly process. | | By allowing power wires to be nearly as thin as signal wires, | you can use simpler connectors with unified terminals. | Manufacturing gets simpler, harnesses get lighter, assembly | gets faster and easier. | | Weight is also a huge deal, every ounce counts. There's upwards | of 100 lbs of wiring harness in most cars, more in larger or | premium models with a lot of accessories. If half of that | weight is signals and won't change with voltage, but the other | half is heavy power circuits that'll get 4x thinner at 48v, | it's significant weight savings. | | Furthermore, switching heavy current means massive relays or | FETs and the heatsinks thereon. If you can reduce the current, | those components get lighter too. Audio amplifiers get lighter, | speakers get lighter (stupid heavy-wound 2-ohm speakers to get | reasonable volume out of low voltage drive? Nah, use standard | 8-ohm now that you have real voltage at the amplifier!), all | sorts of things get lighter. | | That's all in addition to the electric power steering already | mentioned by others. EPS can easily move 1kw for short periods, | and has stupidly huge wiring to do that at 12v. It's still | chunky at 48v, but a lot less so, and can use more common | terminals and connectors. Replacing a hand-assembled bolted | connection with a machine-crimped and clicked-together | connector improves reliability or reduces testing process | overhead. | | It's really significant, and it's embarrassing that the | industry fell flat on its face in the late 90s last time they | tried. Here's hoping this takes off. | panick21_ wrote: | Awesome to hear from an expert. Im looking forward to some | teardowns to see how the set this all up. | mcguire wrote: | The rumor I heard was that the higher voltage resulted in | lower switch lifetimes. Any truth to that? | cogman10 wrote: | Yes, but not meaningfully. The higher the voltage you get, | the more arching there is when a relay trips (also depends | on if there's any sort of inductive load, think the sparks | you see when you unplug a vacuum without turning it off). | | But when you think about the impact that has on switches | and relays, realize that in your own home you have 120V | controlled by switches. Very cheap switches last decades | (though admittedly not switched as often as something like | a blinker). | myself248 wrote: | Ahh, no. | | AC is fundamentally different from DC when it comes to | arcing behavior, because it has zero-crossings. If a | switch arcs while switching AC, the arc goes out 1/120th | of a second later. An arc would have to be pretty | enormous to have enough thermal mass to remain ionized | long enough for the next half-wave to re-energize it and | sustain it. (HV AC transmission and distribution tends to | have SF6-filled switches for this reason.) But around the | house, your AC switches are really simple because they're | not moving anywhere near that much power. And | statistically, some fraction of switch openings happen | with near-zero instantaneous current anyway. | | DC, by comparison, is brutal to switch. It doesn't have | zero crossings, so the arc has to be blown out by the | design of the switch. That means nice wide contact | openings, and on really large ones, magnetic blowouts to | divert the arc into chutes that cool it. | | If you look at a switch datasheet.... pulling up a | randomly-selected one from Digi-Key now.... https://mm.di | gikey.com/Volume0/opasdata/d220001/medias/docus... | | Look at the cycle ratings. It has a bunch of different | ratings depending on the contact form (some that're | forced apart, some that're sprung apart), but in all | cases, the DC rating is equal or much lower current than | the AC rating. And the DC ratings only go to 24V, this | switch IS NOT RATED for use at 48VDC at all, despite | happily going to 250V when switching AC. | | So, if you're comparing apples to apples, if you had | 48VAC for instance, that would be easier to switch than | 120VAC. (At constant current, that is. If you want to | move the same power, you need more current at the lower | voltage, and it gets harder again.) But DC is oranges. | | Yes, switching 48VDC is harder than switching 12VDC, but | only at constant current. And it may require _different_ | switches than 12VDC. Given that you only need a quarter | as much current to move the same power, it's still a net | win, but it's not at all comparable to switching AC. | tootie wrote: | Is Tesla's design here actually innovative or really just | they're the first ones to put together a bunch of stuff that | everyone knew and hasn't had the wherewithal to implement? | ricardobeat wrote: | > or really just they're the first ones to put together a | bunch of stuff that everyone knew | | Thats what 80% of "innovation" is, with the exception of | applied science fields. | myself248 wrote: | I haven't seen the document being referred to elsewhere, | but I highly doubt that there's anything fundamentally new | under the sun. The industry tried this before but got stuck | in a first-mover-disadvantage situation, which doesn't | affect Tesla as severely because they have relatively few | parts in common with other cars in the first place. | | So put me down in the "wherewithal" column. | | That's not to discount it at all. There are some real | challenges; most automotive fuses for instance, are only | rated for 32-volt operation. (Fuse voltage has to do with | the length of the gap opened when the element blows, and | the structure's ability to withstand or staunch any arcing | that may happen.) Telephone fuses would work here but | they're not exactly cost-optimized, I'd love to see what | they do in this space. | | Switch and relay contacts too, may need different or | thicker coatings to reliably break 48 volts at the number | of cycles needed, but they'll be doing so at much lower | currents so I think it's a net win. (Contact wear isn't my | field of expertise, though.) However, mechanical switches | are decreasingly relevant in the power path anyway, and | FETs will definitely do better with the lower currents. | | One thing I saw talked about last time, which is completely | irrelevant now, is alternator load-dumps. You know, due to | the lack of alternators. But in the past, with an accessory | belt spinning an alternator, the power produced by the | machine was dictated by the current in the field winding. | Regulating the output was a simple control loop, sensing | the system voltage and servoing the field current | accordingly. The field winding has significant inductance | so its field can't change quickly, but with a big battery | sitting on the bus that didn't matter. However, if the | battery lead became disconnected, and the power draw on the | system decreased, the alternator would suddenly be | producing too much current and unable to rapidly reduce its | field, and with no battery there to absorb the overage, the | result is the system bus voltage spiking as high as 120 | volts, or at least that's what the load-dump test spec says | you have to withstand for 400 milliseconds. In practice | with incandescent bulbs and some other linear loads around, | they'll typically clamp the transient to 40 volts or so, | but that's still pretty harsh for stuff that's working at | 14-ish. | | The concern was that a 48-volt alternator could produce | some truly terrifying load-dump transients. (Although I | think this is also overblown; it's running at lower current | so the field winding would be weaker and should be able to | decrease its field faster, no? Hmm. I should do some | math...) | | But now that the 12v or 48v is produced by an electronic | DC-DC converter running from the traction battery rather | than an alternator spun by the engine, it's completely | immaterial. | brandonagr2 wrote: | Doing it first is innovative | carabiner wrote: | Have you been able to look at the Tesla document? Do you | think it'll meaningfully help the EE's at other automakers | redesign their architectures? | Tuna-Fish wrote: | And to explain why this hadn't been done before/how we got | here: | | Nothing in a car actually wants 12V DC. Most of the low | voltage stuff will run better at 5V or below, while a lot of | the higher voltage stuff would benefit from going as high as | possible. 12V exists because DC-DC conversion used to be | expensive, and you had to make a compromise about the voltage | based on losses, wire thickness, and picking a low enough | voltage that all the low-voltage stuff doesn't suffer too | much. | | What's changed is that you can get a single-device DC-DC | converter for really cheap these days. Cheap enough that you | might as well put it in the light bulbs, and everywhere else | that wants a low voltage. | brandonagr2 wrote: | Related to the weight of signal wires, Cybertruck also moved | to using ethernet instead of traditional canbus, which | significantly decreased the complexity of that harness | waterheater wrote: | Compared to ICE vehicles, EVs are expensive and heavy | (according to Slate, an F-150 Lightning weighs 35% more than | its ICE sibling). Cost and weight reduction are both important | factors for any EV maker to optimize. | | Why do you assume the 12V bus doesn't drive high-power stuff? | Historically, every single electrical component in a car is | powered at 12V. Everything. Your alternator outputs 12V to both | power your electrical system and charge the 12V battery. Even | the starter and ignition system (distributor or coil pack) | transforms 12V into the high voltages needed for combustion. | | I'm not exactly sure why 48V corresponds to a decrease in | "complexity." My guess is that power and data were sent over | separate cables, whereas PoE does everything together. That's | just a guess, however. | | Assuming the same power requirements, a 4x increase in voltage | translates to a 4x decrease in current. Looking at [1], a | component requiring 8AWG @ 12V can now use 18AWG @ 48V. That's | a significant decrease in copper, resulting in cost and weight | reductions. A higher voltage is almost always preferred, though | the higher electric potential means you need better insulation | and safety measures. | | Though there's a saying that it's current, not voltage, that | kills, high voltage is widely known to be dangerous. For | example, consider the US electrical grid, which is actually a | 240V system, not 120V. Three wires come to your house from the | transformer: -120V, 0V, and 120V. A normal outlet is connected | to either -120V and 0V or 0V and 120V, and you can get a 240V | outlet by connecting to -120V and 120V. This 120V-by-default | setup is much safer than 240V every outlet, like in other parts | of the world, and you can still get a higher voltage for high- | power appliances (e.g. clothes dryer). | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_wire_gauge | contingencies wrote: | _Compared to ICE vehicles, EVs are expensive and heavy_ | | Expensive maybe, IMHO not really, at least in China. Heavy .. | this doesn't sound fair. Are you comparing a cherry-picked, | heavy, full battery back EV with an empty tank ICE? Noting | the EV has far more torque, and that the same tech is used in | UAVs and in a ground vehicle you can arguably move the weight | around (lower it) easier in an EV, this casual observer (not | a car person) would expect superior mass distribution and | lower overall weight (certainly vs torque). | | 500kg solar EV: | https://www.unsw.edu.au/newsroom/news/2022/06/sunswift-7-- | dr... ... compare Toyota Corolla: 1314kg + 50kg fuel / Toyota | Camry: 1360kg + 70kg fuel / Tesla Model 3: 1611kg / Toyota | RAV4 average: 1634kg + 55kg fuel / Tesla Model S: 2107kg / | Tesla Model X: 2458kg / Your cherry-picked example of an | F-150 Lightning: 2948kg / Chevrolet Silverado 1500: 3311kg + | 105kg fuel / way more heavier ICE cars follow... | | Another potential consideration is that the EV is far better | placed to use recovered power from braking, so a small amount | of additional mass will have less efficiency impact than in a | comparable ICE. | stonogo wrote: | Vehicle weight also affects how much wear the roadways | experience. I'm not sure "A Corolla weighs less than a | truck" is relevant here, especially considering that the | F-150 is the most popular vehicle in the US by sales | number. Comparing things to the market leader is generally | a useful metric. | speedgoose wrote: | Heavy trucks damage roads much more than cars. It depends | on the weight but it's exponential. The weight difference | between an EV and an ICE of the same category is not a | big concern to have in terms of road damage. | | https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_power_law | TaylorAlexander wrote: | Why not use 48v? I have been designing my farming robot's | electrical system and it all runs on nominally 45 volts. The | switching power supply you need to downregulate that to 12, 5, | or 3.3v (I have all three on one PCB) is tiny and cheap. [1] | | No matter what voltage or power level you need, higher voltage | will allow for smaller/cheaper wires and connectors that are | easier to route and assemble. | | [1] You can browse the Kicad PCB design directly in the browser | with this handy web viewer. The Power section is the top left: | https://kicanvas.org/?github=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2FTwis... | noncoml wrote: | One example is Porsche PDCC. It needs 48V to work so you end up | with a car that has both. | | Also I think all Mild Hybrids are 48V, so maybe theoretically | you could get rid of the extra 12V battery there? | adolph wrote: | It is interesting to think about how an automaker like Tesla | which is more vertically integrated and has less in the way of | legacy parts/tools/processes can make this change more easily | than the established players. From the article: | | _If you cannot convert all of a vehicle's systems to 48V | architecture, the benefits of using such an architecture start to | diminish pretty quickly . . . If an automaker decides to move to | a 48V architecture, whatever car it builds must use 48V-ready | accessories. But, suppliers aren't incentivized to build such | accessories without sufficient demand._ | elp wrote: | 48Vdc is supposedly the highest voltage that is still considered | safe. | (https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/267789/how-s...) | | It certainly sounds like a smart move on the copper savings | alone. | jauntywundrkind wrote: | Extra low voltage is 50v ac or 100v dv. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extra-low_voltage | | For some reason people assume it's 48v DC or 50v dc. But it's | double that. That said, I feel significantly more scared | dealing with 100v DC than I do 48 or 24v. | myself248 wrote: | That's for IEC. Under OSHA it's 50 volts, AC or DC. | sheepshear wrote: | ELV is not a fundamental definition of "safe". The limits of | what's safe depends on the application and your risk | tolerance, and ELV is just a name for a couple of definitions | out of many. | | Also, those numbers are for ripple-free DC, which you're not | going to find in a car. They're cut roughly in half for | ripple peaks. | amluto wrote: | I find 48V a lot less scary when cars are involved than 12V. | Neither is particularly likely to electrocute me, but 48V | comes with fuses that will trip at 1/4 the current, giving | 1/16 the resistive heating if something shorts, which is a | lot less likely to melt or ignite things. Also, the wires are | much smaller :) | thot_experiment wrote: | > 1/4 the current, 1/16 the resistive heating | | Really underappreciated safety aspect. The currents | required for your average doodad at 48V leave you with a | MUCH lower chance of unscheduled welding. | | Remember folks, everything is a fuse if you put enough | current through it, as a rule of thumb it's good to keep | "enough" pretty low. | shermantanktop wrote: | I used to work on vacuum tube power amps. 400v+ B+ with big | caps is stressful to deal with. And doing it a lot can lead | to complacency. | | We used to call getting shocked "getting a taste" - like | getting a taste of ice cream, except it's more like a | microsecond blackout. | SigmundA wrote: | Remember a fully charged lithium battery with nominal 48v can | be close to 60v just like 12v in your car is actually closer to | 14v. | wongarsu wrote: | However there is a lot of leeway on the "48V is the highest | safe voltage" statement too. 48V has a special place in | regulations because of its use in telco, but 60V DC is still | very safe. | hinkley wrote: | Doubling again to 96 is not safe, however. I'm not sure why | they settled on powers of two. Something perhaps to do with | noise filtration, and fewer new tricks to learn? | myself248 wrote: | It's convenient to build things in multiples and powers | of 2 and 3. A nice two-tier or four-tier battery rack | full of 2-volt cells just works out nicely. | hinkley wrote: | Smaller transformers with whole numbers, right? But why 4 | and not 3 or 6? | TaylorAlexander wrote: | Sure but they can feed the system through a regulator if | they'd like. Do we have any reason to believe they are | tapping directly on to a pack for this part of the system? | myself248 wrote: | For battery-powered systems the nominal voltage is used. | Telephone "48 volts" is 55.2 volts in practice, only falling | near 48 if there's a power failure and the office generators | don't autostart in a timely fashion. | | That's never caused any regulatory problems for Ma Bell, | despite OSHA saying 50v is the cutoff. And personally having | spent roughly a decade of my career crawling all over such | systems, 55.2 doesn't bother me one bit. | | Span-powered T1 at 130VDC, on the other hand.... that'll poke | ya. That gets little plastic covers over all the terminals, | but they have been known to fall off. So there is a | meaningful threshold, and 55.2 is solidly below it. | | Which suggests to me that there's a good bit of leeway built | into the standards, perhaps specifically so they don't have | to wheedle about whether a battery system should be measured | at its nominal voltage, its float voltage, its absorption | voltage, its peak/equalization voltage, its.... | Tempest1981 wrote: | > That's never caused any regulatory problems for Ma Bell, | despite OSHA saying 50v is the cutoff | | I seem to recall getting a buzz when touching phone wires - | while the line was ringing. I think I measured around 100 | VAC. Apparently that's "ok", safety-wise. | rational_indian wrote: | Could have gone higher. Worth it in copper savings alone. IIRC | the cars use AC motors. It needs to go through inverters anyway | so there is some flexibility in how high you can go. | | Edit: of course the motors are "AC" who would want a brush and | commutator based motor in their car? | bryanlarsen wrote: | Most countries have safety rules that apply at 50V, so staying | below that reduces regulatory costs significantly. | rational_indian wrote: | Good point. | epx wrote: | It would be great to have 48VDC in homes, for lightning, light | appliances, etc. to centralize the whole power factor control in | a single big power supply instead of doing it (poorly, or not at | all) at every LED bulb. | bryanlarsen wrote: | It'll happen in RV's first, for obvious reasons. I imagine | they'll use USB-C as the standard connector even though it's | not the optimal form factor for this usage due to its ubiquity. | POE would be a better choice. | tootie wrote: | Doesn't USB-C cap at 20V? | ianburrell wrote: | Latest USB-PD standard allows for 48V and 240W. It uses | special EPR marked cables. | candiddevmike wrote: | Replace all power outlets with Ethernet and have everything run | over 48V PoE and get network connectivity too | bokohut wrote: | While this sounds great in practice the reality will be far | from ideal for the singular reason of security. The cyber | issues are compounding at exponential rates as more and more | devices that make things "easy" lack even the most basic | security protocols and the production targets to generate | revenue asap have zero to nil concern around protecting said | devices from nefarious actors while in use. When the | electrical and data transfer grid become one, as I believe it | must for reasons of efficiency, we are certain to witness | chaos and losses like never before. What you cannot see | matters most! and in time many will pay the ultimate cost for | someone else's 'easy'. | vlovich123 wrote: | More like basically every electronics product uses AC. It's | a two sided market problem - there's no demand because | there's no supply and no supply because there's no demand. | | The security aspects are solvable through various standards | (eg we have LAN over power lines and coax already and they | layer encryption on top to build the mesh while balancing | UX). The security concerns may be the #1 concern for you | but has nothing to do with market adoption. | ianburrell wrote: | PoE 802.3bt tops out at 71W. Not even enough to enough to run | big USB-C adapter. Also, PoE is pretty lossy which defeats | the whole purporse of using DC to save energy. | bluGill wrote: | You would need larger wires to account for the losses at a | house scale. Since nothing runs are 48 volts you still have the | bad power supply in every LED bulb. | jnsaff2 wrote: | The Dutch have some homes that are DC. Here's even a paper | discussing this[0]. There is also a presentation that mentions | DC homes from page 18[1]. | | [0] - https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB2595.pdf [1] - | https://fhi.nl/app/uploads/sites/38/2018/06/10.00-DC-Power-e... | ianburrell wrote: | The DC power for LED varies based on the bulb and most are less | than 48V. Which means you end up with DC-DC converter in each | one. DC-DC is slightly more efficient than DC-AC but not enough | to make worth converting. | | The same is true of electronics, you are replacing AC-DC | charger with DC-DC charger. | | The other big problem is that lots of appliances require more | power than feasible with 48V. People are fine with the low- | power DC right up until they need to plug in a space heater. | Are you going to have two kinds of outlets everywhere? Or | incrementally upgrade each circuit? Or are going to upgrade the | wiring with super thick cable that can handle the current? | londons_explore wrote: | Am I right in saying this _wasn 't_ shared with the public or | other (Chinese) OEM's... | | Doesn't that raise collusion/anti competitive concerns? Or is | Elon relying on the fact no prosecutor will take a case about | disadvantaging china? | KaiserPro wrote: | "shared" in the sense that everyone else was doing it already. | In the same way that he's shared the hyperloop, which he got | from a 1980s osbourne book of transport. | panick21_ wrote: | I think the more important change that Tesla made is the change | in the databus. Much higher performance ethernet. They changed | the whole architecture of the car where there are now very few | point to point connection, and its all essentially routed with a | few major modules in each part of the car. | | If you look at current cars there are sometimes huge cable | bundles, lots of individual cables for everything. Its a | nightmare to build up and very hard to install. | | I think in their next generation assembly they will have these | connection points be fixed and then just plug different sub | assembly together at predetermined points. No more huge cable | harness installed on completed bodies. | KaiserPro wrote: | > Much higher performance ethernet. | | Depends what performance you are after. Ethernet isn't rated | for safety critical stuff. It doesn't provide mechanisms for | packet loss detection, and in most cases is pretty shit at flow | control. | | Ethernet is also shit for small sensors/actuators. There are | lots of low bandwidth devices that need power and comms, | ethernet isn't designed for that. having to route 2 pairs of | cables to everything in a star pattern is really impractical. | | Its probably ok for linking different zones, of non critical | stuff. But running PoE? for all but specialist things, that | sounds frankly stupid. | 7e wrote: | Mild hybrids have been using 48V for a long time. There isn't | much new here except that Tesla decided to do every component. | That's going to cause quality problems with parts if they remain | a tech. island in the industry, so trying to get everyone else on | board makes sense. | panick21_ wrote: | Doing it for everything is the whole point, it changes the | architecture of the car. Yes individual components but those | cars had like 1% if connected devices at that voltage and were | otherwise exactly the same. | | For Tesla ist a replacment of something else, for previous | vehicle was it was something additional for a specialized use | case. | yinser wrote: | I liked the interview with auto engineer Sandy Munro discussing | the change https://youtu.be/ADwGGEj8sqQ?si=qp6akvy1yyWPTYNe | | - moving the voltage up means you can drop current | | - increase the data rate by using ethernet and PoE | | - using ethernet and PoE means you don't have to run one off | wires to each device, they can share a bus which results in half | the copper being used in a lower voltage car | | - moving the voltage up also means reduced heat produced | TheLoafOfBread wrote: | > using ethernet and PoE means you don't have to run one off | wires to each device, they can share a bus which results in | half the copper being used in a lower voltage car | | You mean like CAN bus is being used since 1990s? I think that | Mr Munro little bit fell asleep and missed whole CAN bus and | FlexRay evolution in cars. | KaiserPro wrote: | > using ethernet and PoE means you don't have to run one off | wires to each device, they can share a bus which results in | half the copper being used in a lower voltage car | | Ethernet isn't a bus, its point to point. PoE over cat5/6 uses | 4 pairs of UTP. | | so it might be used to join aggregate things together, but it | won't be a bus. | | Yes, you can increase the datarate, but ethernet is | fundamentally unreliable. So you'll need to either strictly | manage the bandwidth requirements of attached devices, or put | in flow control(expensive) or use the weird "reliable" Ethernet | they made for fibre channel replacment ($lol and you need to | pay to make it automotive rated) | | 48v is logical, and a lot of other people are doing it. | | PoE is probably stupid | | Ethernet makes kinda sense, but firewire would probably be | better, its a bus and rated for life critical use. | TheLoafOfBread wrote: | Ethernet can be used as a bus (see CSMA/CD), but if there are | more than 2 nodes, performance of whole bus will go to | complete shit and there is no guarantee that an ECU will | transmit a single packet during its run, because that CD has | no automatic arbitration, it is just random disconnection and | try again. Not good for critical things like ABS. That's also | whole reason why FlexRay was spawned, because even that FR is | inflexible abomination of a protocol it actually guarantees | that every ECU on the network will get a time window to | transmit its own data. | KaiserPro wrote: | > CSMA/CD | | Lol I'd forgotten about base-T. | pedrocr wrote: | Golf carts have used mainly 48V for traction for a long time. And | there are now great options for 48V LFP batteries for them. So | far that usually means also running a 12V converter to power | accessories. If the automotive world finally gets their act | together on 48V this will be great for all kinds of DIY uses. The | batteries and chargers are already here. There are a bunch of off | grid and mobility applications that should be made simpler by | this. Hopefully the automotive supply chain moves meaningfully | around this. | MisterTea wrote: | I've been waiting for higher automotive voltage for a long time. | Way back I wished for 48V as it's double the 24V standard used in | European and off highway trucks as well as industrial automation | and -48V is used in telecom. Wires can now carry 4x power. But | from memory there was a 50V safe limit that would complicate | things as the 48V charging voltage exceeds 50V as does the | nominal cell voltage. So instead the industry selected 36V and | planned to migrate but it never happened. The reason being LED | lighting and small more efficient electronics reduced the need | for higher voltages. | | With EV's there's no reason to keep 12 V. | jnsaff2 wrote: | The "expert" in the article got it wrong. The relationship | between the voltage and the losses in the wires is not | proportional. They are squared. Going from 12V to 48V is not a | saving of 4x rather 16x. | | For some applications you could also consider Power over Ethernet | in the car, get both shielded comms and power. Or can and power | over twisted pair. | contingencies wrote: | The great thing about PoE standards is there's so many to | choose from. | https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_over_Ethernet#Standards_... | | Honestly, ethernet introduces a degree of non-determinism with | respect to time in the link layer, plus increased bringup | times, a potentially more costly core switching fabric, and the | need for critical revision of latency assumptions on any | potentially safety-related control concerns. Also, max current | is not high. I would wager these are the reasons it won't be | rushing to an EV near you... it's basically only suitable for a | subset of uses, and heterogeneous infrastructure costs more in | design, installation and maintenance cost than it nominally | saves in production volume standards alignment and HR | familiarity. (Source: Mechatronic systems design for the last | ~8 years, IANAEE) | jnsaff2 wrote: | Sure. It's also not like there are many ready made devices | that are already available for PoE that could be useful in | automotive industry. | | I guess my main thought was that going to 48V and in the | world of low power LED lights and such, combining power and | comms into same wires/cables is something that might be | appealing. | contingencies wrote: | Historically and increasingly, automotive grade electronics | are a separate genre to general electronics for reasons of | safety. | bgnn wrote: | It's less of a safety but more of a production and | environmental constraints issue. Cat5 cables are too | heavy for cars. Their connectors aren't made for | vibration. They have a lot of emissions which is a | problem for the mission critical parts (Ethernet Phy | often isn't mission critical). They are expensive, which | is actually the biggest reason they aren't good for | automotive. | | Automotive reliability is only an issue for your ABS | sensor, airbag sensor etc. but these are a minority | compared to what's in modern cars these days. Real driver | is cost, compactness (cost) and harsh environment | (temperature and vobrations) and EM emissions. It mainly | adds to qualification time, but actual semiconductor | design cycle isn't that long. That being said, data | center stuff is also notoriously slow to qual. | bgnn wrote: | Automotive ethernet over copper physical layer is | completely different than commercial/data center ethernet. | It is defined in 802.3ch for multi gigabit (2.5, 5 and 10 | Gbps). It uses single shielded twisted pair cables up to | 15m long. Cables and connectors are automotive grade. | | The power over data line (PoDL, automotive Ethernet | equivalent of PoE) is defined by a separate IEEE protocol | and its critical specifications like EM emissions tests, | ESD tests etc are supplemented by documents created by a | consortium of car, electrinics, comnector, cablr and | semiconductor producors called OPEN Alliance: | https://opensig.org/ . There are parts available for PoDL. | The voltage levels from 6V to 60V with 6V increments are | supported. | | Source: I design both data center and automotive Ethernet | chips. | rfdonnelly wrote: | Regarding deterministic latency, the Time-Sensitive | Networking (TSN) [1] set of IEEE standards address this. The | IEEE P802.1DG project [2] in particular defines a TSN profile | for automotive. | | [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time-Sensitive_Networking | [2] https://1.ieee802.org/tsn/802-1dg/ | numpad0 wrote: | Automotive Ethernet is not 8P8C...that's not how they do it at | all | amelius wrote: | If you go to a higher voltage, you will typically use smaller | wires. | hinkley wrote: | Tesla didn't invent 48 volts either. The EV and hybrid electric | world were talking about 48 volts when Musk still worked at | PayPal, if not earlier. | | One of the examples pulled out at that time was that you could | shave a couple pounds of copper off the alternator by running | it at 4x the voltage. Much thinner wires. | tzs wrote: | Hold on a second...4x the voltage means you only need 1/4th the | current. The power loss in the wire is current^2 x the wire's | resistance, so 1/4th the current does indeed mean 1/16th the | losses. | | But 1/4th the current means you can use a higher gauge wire. | Looking at a table of wire gauge current capacities it looks | like if your maximum current is 1/4th you can switch to wire | with 1/4th the cross section. And resistance is inversely | proportional to cross section, so 1/4th the cross section means | 4x the resistance. | | Doesn't that then bring the savings down from the 16x you would | get if you just upped the voltage down to 4x? | satiric wrote: | Yes, typically the savings would be in the weight and | physical size of the wiring harness (as well as possibly | allowing for tighter bend radii). You'd design for a max | amount of heat generated by the wiring harness, or possibly a | max voltage drop if that's a constraint. You don't need to do | heat dissipation calculations yourself, there are standards | like SAE AS50881 that do the heavy lifting for you. | | Edit: Smaller wire is also cheaper of course. That's probably | a pretty significant upside when talking about a mass- | produced vehicle. | simplypeter wrote: | The thing is, unless the whole industry moves together to 48V, | the cost of this change for a single OEM+Tier1 would be too big. | MetaWhirledPeas wrote: | In cases where they're using a proprietary 48v part I wonder if | Tesla would consider becoming a parts supplier to other | manufacturers? | SilverBirch wrote: | This is basically the crux of the matter. Traditional | automakers are a complex supply chain that standardises and | goes to extra-ordinary lengths to reduce costs. Tesla build a | tonne of their own stuff and aren't as price sensitive. The | question is "Why don't we just redesign all this stuff" and the | answer is "We're Ford, we make tiny margins and we can't afford | to redesign our entire car every year and even if we could we | get half our components from Bosch anyway". Not to mention the | difficulty in convincing FuSa people your arbitrary ethernet | network is safe. | jmrm wrote: | >48V architecture also potentially improves overall electrical | efficiency for reasons that I am not sufficiently qualified to | explain beyond a kindergarten level | | This is double bad in a green energy and EV website: On one hand, | they admit they don't now why that happens, but on the other | hand, they also didn't research just a bit more on that, and | that's bad journalism. | | Most of the comment threads in this HN post are a lot more | informative than the article | CamperBob2 wrote: | Also, "But don't you dare threaten to replace me with an LLM. | Journalism is a sacred cornerstone of democracy and | intellectual life!" | wnevets wrote: | I don't know if I would call a self proclaimed content | marketer a Journalist. | dududhxhd wrote: | Nonsense. It's a bit of self deprecating humor and gives | readers enough information to follow along. | Animats wrote: | Older Tesla cars have a 12V battery for accessories, until the | main high-voltage battery is turned on. So does this mean having | a 48V accessory battery? Or what? | bloggie wrote: | I don't know much about the Cybertruck, but in general all | modern cars, electrically propulsed or not, have a 12 V system | which includes a battery for running electronics and some | accessories. Very old cars had a 6 V system. There is a push to | move to higher voltages, the battery would also be 48 V to | match. https://my.avnet.com/abacus/resources/article/the-shift- | to-4... | etamponi wrote: | If higher voltage leads to benefits, then why 48 and not 120 (US) | or 230 (EU)? Or higher? What are the tradeoffs? ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-12-07 23:00 UTC)