[HN Gopher] Math Team ___________________________________________________________________ Math Team Author : carabiner Score : 112 points Date : 2023-12-20 00:58 UTC (22 hours ago) (HTM) web link (benexdict.io) (TXT) w3m dump (benexdict.io) | gumby wrote: | What a horrifying existence. The author recognized the problem, | "The problem with doing something pointless for accolades is that | you have to do so much of it, for so much longer than you expect" | but what were the consequences? Are they happy now? | | BTW MIT doesn't do legacies. | carabiner wrote: | He basically says "yes" at the end. Got an awesome job and | career and became part of a tech power couple with his wife he | met freshman year, all because of his high school struggles. In | current late stage capitalism, I think this is the best outcome | you can reasonably seek. You're either in the elite or | scrounging around, reposting memes about doordashing mcdonalds | and having too many roommates. I wish I had followed the path | of OP. I encourage gen alpha, gen z to strive for OP's path, | optimizing for income, in order to have a happy life with food, | secure shelter, healthcare, and a retirement life. Increasingly | it's just the haves and have-nots. The middle is crumbling away | and you must maximize income potential in order to have a | decent life. | | I think a lot about a meme I saw: "I'm a therapist, and while | therapy is great, what I think what most people need is money." | lusus_naturae wrote: | The problem with your suggestion is that it implicitly | suggests death for loser commoners, of which there will | always statistically be more. The loser commoners need some | way to ensure their basic needs are met, or they find a way | to do that anyways. For example, see all the "eat the rich" | rhetoric. I don't think there's anything wrong with | suggesting that people should try to make the most of what | they have, but suggesting that you need math skills or a | Stanford degree to be guaranteed basic human needs or rights | is a shortsighted perspective that doesn't account for the | variety of human experience, eventually leading to | surmounting misery for others. For anyone with a | consequentialist pov, consider this: increasing societal | misery only leads to broken communal structures, and failures | in social contracts (implicit or otherwise). Simply, more | poor and sad people = more chances of societal unrest = less | safe society for everyone (including elites). | drivebyhooting wrote: | Great. So is your suggestion that high school students | should focus on politics and building an equitable society | instead of optimizing for themselves? That would be very | altruistic indeed. | lusus_naturae wrote: | I guess we've come far enough from being hunter-gatherers | that the value of acts that ensure group cohesion and | community wellbeing seem like some sort of extra effort | or altruism, instead of a fundamental aspect of | optimizing survival as a whole. That said, I was talking | about governance and policies, not what career choices | someone should or could make. | carabiner wrote: | In the US at least, you're most likely to effect systemic | change by having a lot of money. | zeitgeistcowboy wrote: | In the 4th paragraph he describes "the arc of a stone falling to | earth" as an exponential function. Is that true? I always thought | it was quadratic. | superb-owl wrote: | Yeah that jumped out to me too | joaogui1 wrote: | He did say he's not a mathematician | jackhalford wrote: | I can confirm, in classical mechanics, flat gravitional fields | give paths that follow quadratic trajectories. | markisus wrote: | Solutions to linear differential equations are exponentials, | and this may be what the author meant. In a state space model, | we can write Newton's law under gravity if we let y(t) = [x(t), | x'(t)]^T, let A = [ 0, 1; 0 0], let b = [0, -g]^T, and set | y'(t) = A y(t) + b. | | Indeed, the solution is y(t) = exp(A t) (y0 + int_0^t exp(-As) | b ds). | | In Einstein's theory, we have a generalization which says a | stone's path through space-time follows a geodesic of the | metric. In differential geometry, the exponential function, by | definition, sends tangent vectors to geodesic curves. | | So the author is right, under this interpretation. | gowld wrote: | He also wrote that the angels in a triangle sum to 180^0 :-) | aleyan wrote: | Went to the same school, was on the same math team, but was a | year ahead of the author. Quit math team in my junior year | because I wasn't at a competitive level, but it was a great time | while I was on it. As a SWE, I rarely get to exercise the | tenacity and problem solving skills I learned on the math team, | but when I do they are "transformative" to the rest of the team. | | > Nights were for other worthless extracurriculars to pad out our | applications. ... The worst part was knowing that it was all | going to be extruded into a few lines in an application form, | that a committee would review for about ninety seconds | | This is the tail wagging the dog; work really hard for 4 years in | HS so that the next 4 years will be spent at a comparatively more | prestigious college. I don't think we should expect high school | students to be able to optimize this correctly themselves, and | from my experience guidance counselors weren't particularly | helpful. College admissions feel like a local maxima that have a | lot of unintended side effects but would be difficult to change. | | Personally, I didn't do the extracurriculars that would look good | for college, but rather the ones I enjoyed; I didn't study very | hard either. Didn't get into Stanford or an Ivy, but I look upon | my experience in high school/college fondly rather than bitterly. | Life seems to have turned out ok too. | quax23 wrote: | I can relate; I didn't study quite as hard as my peers, didn't | get into the prestigious private colleges that they got into | (still went to an excellent public school across the Bay from | Stanford), studied a fair bit of math, and ended up with a | decent job where I've found that my math and problem solving | skills have paid dividends. I'm certainly not making tech or | F-U money, but I have a comfortable life a few years out of | college and I'm lucky that I didn't have to sacrifice my youth | or my interests to get here. | | It's also interesting to follow the trajectories of people who | were in the group that over-optimized for outcomes but have | fallen off that path. I think the author was able to mitigate | his burnout (I presume he had a good tech career), but I know a | fair amount of folks with good pedigrees who haven't, and are | still in limbo (unemployed, underemployed, or taking an | extended break early in their career/schooling). I know they | have the potential to do great things, but it seems the stakes | of burnout are much higher today and harder to recover from | financially. | stocknoob wrote: | Excellent read. The danger of deferring gratification is that you | become a subconscious master of it. | DalekBaldwin wrote: | High school, at least as far as it serves as a sorting mechanism | for top students, follows a kind of Parkinson's law: the number | of hoops to jump through increases until it reaches the natural | limit of how little sleep the top students can handle. | | There were rumblings that my high school, which had plenty of AP | classes already, was about to introduce a combination AP/IB | curriculum, which absolutely terrified us. I and my AP-taking | classmates breathed a huge sigh of relief when it was announced | that it would be delayed, and the students in the year below us | would be the guinea pigs. They would have to run twice as fast | just to stay in place. | mountainofdeath wrote: | Indeed. In my time, it wasn't uncommon to have 6 AP classes a | semester along with at least one time-intensive | extracurricular. Assuming each class is the equivalent of 3 | credit hours, it's the equivalent of an above average number of | classes in college (15 being the expected amount, 12 being the | minimum to be a full-time student, and 18 considered intensive) | while playing a competitive sport. | | The best part: Even a decade ago, the above was considered | neccesary but not sufficient for admission to a top school. | Plenty of people with perfect to near-perfect college entrance | exams, Intel International Science and Engineering Fair | finalists, etc didn't make the cut. Of the few that did, the | majority were the lower Ivy's (Dartmouth and Brown). | wjnc wrote: | There is a book called "Seven checkmarks" in Dutch that | argues that succes in the Netherlands is strongly correlated | to seven checkmarks to have: male, highly educated parents, | white, certain type of elite high school, university educated | and one more. Having all the marks, having generally | underperformed academically and still coming out on top | comparatively I feel there might be some truth in it. It | would signal a quite stratified society with a "ruler class" | inside a society that thinks of itself as classless for the | last 60 years at least. (It's pretty hard to reason about | this being while being under scrutiny.) | | Why post this? After reading your comment I thought wouldn't | want to live there or raise children there. But the second | thought was, wait - that's meritocracy in action. Imperfect | meritocracy as you point out, but it might still be more | equitable not than having seven checkmarks and generally | faring worse than those born under a different star. My | Rawlsian self thinks grit should be rewarded more than birth, | even though testing for grit would probably massively | increase burnout. | | Thinking even further, I don't think that societies with | "high grit" (Korea, US) are generally considered to treat | their children and general society very equitable. Still | mentally debating if there is a very socialist argument | growing inside of me. That book (read it three months ago) | does make me think a lot. It was the first time something | 'near-woke' made me think so hard. The book mentions the | reflective point as well - might I only take it that | seriously because it was written by someone from the same | "class"? Foundational stuff. | ska wrote: | My own path through related stuff is unusual, so nothing like the | authors. I do however have experience working with and teaching | people who were on very similar paths to theirs. | | There are a huge number of kids in this authors shoes, ones who | are on a treadmill and not entirely sure why. There are also lots | of kids who were always the best at something (in this case math) | that any of their teachers etc. had ever seen ... until they move | across the country and find themselves in a classroom where they | are middling at best. And sure, there are rare kids who are so | good it catches you off guard. | | FWIW I suspect there are more kids made miserable than those who | thrive, but I think it's largely unavoidable in a tournament | system like "elite" college apps. There are also plenty of kids | who had some fun and made some friends along the way without | taking it too seriously. I suspect in this case it's often a good | outlook in high school, especially for kids who don't really fit | in anywhere else. | TrackerFF wrote: | I'm from Scandinavia, and I always find it both fascinating _and_ | alien how much focus the US system puts on extracurriculars - and | more specifically competitive extracurricular activities. | | On one side, it is probably good to motivate pupils to aim for | something, and get good at it - but on the other side, you | obviously end up with a bunch of kids that are just really good | at grinding away - even if their heart is not there. And must | become some obligatory thing, because everyone else is doing it. | | FWIW, over here academics is the only thing that maters. There | are no entrance exams, no personal letter, no letter of | recommendation, no extracurricular activities. Your GPA is the | only thing that maters. | | (Of course, that also has its downsides. People end up re-taking | HS exams year after year, because someone beat their GPA with a | decimal point.) | sinkwool wrote: | > I always find out both fascinating and alien how much focus | the US system puts on extracurriculars | | One factor could be that, AFAIU, schools in US have many more | electives than in Europe. As a student you have the choice to | take more advanced classes for one subject, and only basic in | other subjects, whereas in Europe, the curriculum is standard | for all. So Universities in US need to compare performance on | different axes. | | > Of course, that also has its downsides. People end up re- | taking HS exams year after year, because someone beat their GPA | with a decimal point. | | Another downside to the one-size-fits-all standard curriculum, | is that it forces you to care about classes that you don't | really care about, while not being able to focus on the | subjects that you're really interested in. I think in US, if | you're really good at something, universities may ignore | average-to-poor performance in other areas. | carabiner wrote: | Not everyone else is doing it. OP article is about the top 1% | of high school students with elite ambitions. In your country, | this might be like highlighting an Olympian's training vs. your | average recreationist. The vast, vast majority of US students | go to university with acceptance rates of 50% or higher where | your GPA is the determinant. | TrackerFF wrote: | I mean, the elite students here end up doing pretty much the | same thing as elite students in US: They become medical | doctors, investment bankers, management consultants for MBB, | hedge fund and private equity, and what have you. But I guess | we don't have to jump through the same amount of hoops to get | accepted. | | With that said, we have around 20 universities and colleges | in Norway, versus the thousands you have in the US - so I | would imagine that elite employers in the US rely more on | colleges/universities for the filtering part, which in turn | filter HS students. A whole lotta filtering going on, it | would seem. | jimbokun wrote: | It's so elite institutions can avoid admitting only Asian | students. | fatnoah wrote: | Interesting. Maybe I'm significantly older (graduated high school | in the early 90's) than the poster, but math team was a big deal | at my high school. So much so that my school fielded 3 teams (A, | B, and C) for regional competitions. At local meets, A and B | teams typically always came in first and second respectively, | with C (only a partial team) coming in third or fourth. A team | also won the state championships twice. | | In general, it was pretty low key. Local meets were every month | or so, practice was about 2 hours a week, though we did more for | states. At no point did I think about the impact on my college | admissions, and I don't recall it coming up in conversation with | anyone else. | | (warning: humblenrag) In fact, the only real negative memory I | have was that the individual high scorers got graphing | calculators until the year I had the high score and got a | calculus textbook. Of course, when I got to college and had to | pay for textbooks, I learned that the calculus text probably was | more expensive than the calculator. | noqc wrote: | The author writes a decent essay, but the claims that he makes | about the mathematics curriculum don't really line up with my own | experience of the subject, and I suspect has nothing to do with | his actual trauma. | | This passage sticks out to me: | | >I kept getting put into advanced mathematics classes while | missing core concepts from previous years.... Eventually I was in | classes with no standard curriculum at all, classes that had | names like Discrete Mathematics and Advanced Topics II. To this | day I have no idea what level of math they were meant to | correspond to. | | I don't know how an adult who has spent so much time actually | trying to learn mathematics can maintain the hallucination that | math is organized into "levels". The lack of a standard | curriculum is an actual fucking blessing. God forbid someone | except for the bureaucrats at pearson/macmillan and whatever | federal committee decides on the standard curriculum for K-12 get | to plan a math course. The author's opinion on this is backwards. | | Moreover, he wasn't "lacking the core concepts" needed to take on | these elementary topics, because there aren't any. That's the | point. Math is built from nothing. | | Second, you can feel the resentment in the author's voice when he | talks about his friend who became a mathematician of sorts. And | that resentment is that his friend is actually interested in | mathematics. This is an interesting insight, but it's unrelated | to his thesis. | | We can gain more insight into the author's world view by | considering some of his other essays. In "Math Team", he lists an | impressive set of extra curriculars, but for some reason shies | away from the mention of his church. However in [1] we see the | following: | | >Church was a big time commitment for us. We had prayer meetings | on Tuesday night, Friday night youth group, Sunday services and | Sunday school, and then Bible study later at night. | | This is an altogether different account of how his time was spent | as a youth. Maybe it's important to the author not to place | anything online which would cause conflict with his parents, but | it seems to me that the obvious _thing putting too much pressure | on his childhood time_ is this. | | This essay on church is generally full of contradictions as well, | for instance: | | > [Church] makes it hard to be honest. In church we valued having | deep, personal conversations with each other, but it felt like | people always held something back. | | followed not two paragraphs later by the exact opposite claim: | | > It's easier to trust a group of people if you know that you are | all committed to the same things. | | In [2], the author concludes with a summary of what he believes | faith to be: | | >Faith is not a process for choosing what to believe in or what | to commit to. It is a tool for helping with what comes next. | Creeping doubt and regression to status quo is natural, even in | the absence of any new evidence. Faith is the virtue of | counteracting that regression, through repeated internalization | of those truths and commitments. | | The conclusion I draw from this collection of essays, is that the | author knows exactly what was wrong, but considers it a virtue to | lie to themselves about it. Perhaps denying your natural doubts | can sometimes be good for you, but to me it sounds a lot more | like the spike protein on the mind virus of Christianity wreaking | havoc. Regardless, if you're not willing to engage with your | doubts, then you have no business putting your thoughts into an | essay under the pretense of intellectual honesty. | | 1: https://www.benedict.one/2020/12/09/church-and-community/ 2: | https://www.benedict.one/2020/03/02/faith/ | akprasad wrote: | The author mentions "dropping [his] religion" here [1], which | undercuts the idea that he is lying to himself about his | religious doubts. | | I don't think much good comes from analyzing a private stranger | in this way, especially given such limited evidence. | | [1]: https://benexdict.io/p/uncertainty-and-marriage | noqc wrote: | I didn't claim that the author is still "religious". I | claimed that the author maintains the importance of "faith". | This is the same thing as being religious, of course, but | without the specifics. | | He is publicly making an argument that math team is dull and | bad. The argument is based in the evidence of his personal | experience, and the philosophy with which he approached this | math team is _very important context_ that he has left out, | which undermines his claim. | | He's also not a private stranger. He has 1500 followers on | twitter, and an extensive blog about his personal life. | sfink wrote: | Nice take-down, and I appreciate the points you raise, but | isn't | | > if you're not willing to engage with your doubts, then you | have no business putting your thoughts into an essay under the | pretense of intellectual honesty. | | kind of talking about every essay, ever? The only people free | from doubt are on ventilators and definitely aren't writing a | lot of essays. The very act of writing an essay is engaging | with (a few of) your doubts. And if you're writing it for | others to read, you're painting it over with some level of | pretense. | | Just because he's not engaging with your personal hobby horse | of uncritically accepted Christianity doesn't mean he doesn't | have something to say. Show me a being with a pure mind, free | of any self-contradiction or self-avoidance. | | Really, please do, so I can pet it and make it wag its tail. | | > the author knows exactly what was wrong, but considers it a | virtue to lie to themselves about it. | | As do we all. Only the topic varies. | noqc wrote: | >kind of talking about every essay, ever? | | Absolutely not. Only the bad ones. An essay is an argument | with yourself. If you take the explicit position that you | should ignore your doubts, as this author does, then what you | are putting on paper is your personal confirmation bias. | | My hobby horse is not christianity, my hobby horse is the | thing that he has insanely distilled from christianity as the | part worth keeping. The author had a bad experience as a teen | applying to elite colleges for no other reason than because | he was supposed to, and the conclusion he _should_ be drawing | from this observation is so obvious that you might not even | notice that he doesn 't. | qrian wrote: | The high school math Olympiad team is the fondest memory of mine. | It was like solving puzzle games every day. But I guess if you | are forced into puzzle games when you don't like it can be a | torture. I also changed my career to tech but I still look fondly | back into the days when I could be immersed into solving problems | without getting pulled into various meetings. | qsort wrote: | Same. Not American so perhaps the experience is different | across the ocean, but it was truly magical. As an awkward, | weird kid that didn't really know what to do with himself it | was life changing. | | My former team is still alive and going strong, and after uni I | went back as a coach. I still hear the same stories about how | awesome the group is, and how kids that now are in the same | position as I was find it a "safe space", if you will. | paladin314159 wrote: | Although I empathize with the struggle of the journey, having | gone through a similar path of math team -> Stanford (where I | briefly ran into the author), I think this is a particularly | uncharitable characterization of math competitions. | | Yes, there are many students (even more these days) that are in | the grind for the accolades and college admissions, but math | competitions were genuinely my favorite part of high school. They | helped hone my problem solving, grit (!), work ethic, social | skills, and leadership skills in a way that I continue to see pay | off 15 years later. I am forever grateful for my high school | teacher who supported me during this time. | | It helped that I was actually passionate about it, which I think | is the underlying point here. Weird constructs like math | competitions that help kids channel their passions? Incredible. | Forced hoop-jumping for the purpose of college admissions? | Horrible. | 33a wrote: | The author sounds burnt out and bitter. I get that he tried | really hard and didn't quite make it as far as he wanted, but | this reads like he's holding onto a lot of resentment for no good | reason. | | My experience with doing competitive math and programming stuff | was generally quite enjoyable even though I never did the best or | made it to an ivy league school. I'd still encourage any kid | who's at all interested to try them out. Solving puzzles is fun! | Who cares if learning number theory is "useless". So are video | games, football and chess. | sailorganymede wrote: | I think the problem the author is referring to is it stopped | being about Math and much more about impressing random | strangers for the chance to gain an opportunity. | | My experience is similar to you - I too really enjoyed my time | doing these activities but once everything I ever enjoyed | started becoming brownie points for my college applications, | the competition started becoming "Grind X tasks and Y patterns | so you can make the grade! Cause if you don't solve this in 14 | minutes, then that kid will and he'll get your position!" | cl3misch wrote: | > What would that be like, I wondered, as his words floated | gently through the space above my head, to just be interested in | something, not as a stepping stone or as a resume line, but just | to sit down and count the paths, just because you wanted to know | how many there were? | | Not that great, necessarily. Sometimes I wish that I could simply | be happy with a "normal" job that pays the bills. Instead of | feeling like I have to pursue an academic career, just to be able | to work on the problems I am interested in. | blauditore wrote: | The whole concept of "getting into X" especially in American | education is ridiculous. It shows how unhealthy the system is if | you can't trust someone's degree if they haven't been to some | "elite" college. | OkayPhysicist wrote: | I wouldn't blame the education system as much as I'd blame | industry in this case, actually. The problem is companies that | are too big for their britches: Most of the time, you don't | need the best of the best. You need someone who will show up on | time, get the work done, and not turn out to be so abrasive | that they alienate the rest of your team. Most companies are | not working on hard problems, they're not even working on | tricky problems. They're just working on the remaining | problems. Average should be adequate, and that's what average | schools produce. | | Of course, some places are working on genuinely hard problems. | They need outstanding individuals, and these are what elite | schools offer: They've already done the filtering, ensuring | that the very highest performing individuals disproportionately | possess one of their diplomas. The elite school may or may not | have the greatest instructors, but regardless the students will | get a superior education simply due to the fact that they are | embedded in an environment that surrounds them with outstanding | talent. | | In this way what university you went to acts a signifier as to | your abilities, not just how much you know, but how rapidly | you're able to learn new things, and how much work you're | willing to put in. | dexwiz wrote: | It's because there are enough rich people who only want to hire | Ivy League graduates. Not for any fact other than everyone | around them that is Ivy League tells them its the best place to | hire from. | 3523582908 wrote: | wow, i really empathized with this | | i was so burnt out upon entering MIT, and now i regret not taking | a gap year or something. i feel like i missed out on a great | learning opportunity | | thank you for writing this. you opened a bit of a window into my | past i haven't really processed | TraceWoodgrains wrote: | The author and I have discussed this elsewhere, but we had | dramatically different experiences with competitive math, and I | think part of the key is that he experienced it as a part of the | college admissions grind, while I experienced it as an escape | from the classroom to go do cool puzzles. | | My major takeaway from his article was "The things we do in the | high-stakes holistic admissions structure we've set up are | insane" more than anything to do with competition math in | specific. | tbihl wrote: | Interestingly, his takeaway seems to be that it was probably | all worth it. | ajkjk wrote: | I did mathcounts and math team stuff in middle school/HS and it | never once occurred to me that the goal was to get into a good | college. It just seemed fun. | | I wasn't great at it, but I was pretty good considering that I | didn't get any training, and I always thought it would have felt | amazing to actually get good at those tests and feel like a math | wizard. I guess I'm a bit bitter about it; it's a shame the | special opportunities go to people who are depressingly minmaxing | instead of people who would really love to have them. Although I | also know that at some level if I had 'resolved' to get good I | could have, so I can't be too resentful. | lapcat wrote: | > A mathlete is someone who participates in math competitions. He | (almost always he) | | That wasn't my experience. But FWIW I went to a public high | school. | | My friend (her) and I (he) both got accepted into an elite | school, but we both had to go state colleges, because our | families couldn't afford to send us. This was decades ago, when | they didn't give out as many need-based grants. | fortenforge wrote: | The author mentions at one point that he was unable to solve a | problem because he didn't memorize the formula for the Euler | totient function in order to count the number of numbers | relatively prime to 9999. | | ...but its actually an interesting (and not super difficult) | exercise in its own right to figure this out even if you don't | know the formula. Encourage you all to give it a shot. | | SPOILERS: 9999 = 3^2 * 11 * 101, so first subtract out the | multiples of 3 (3333 of them), the multiples of 11 (909 of them), | the multiples of 101 (99 of them). Note that we've now double- | subtracted multiples of 33 (303 of them), multiples of 303 (33 of | them), multiples of 1111 (9 of them) so add these back. Finally | subtract 1 to not count 9999 itself. | | phi(9999) = 9999 - 3333 - 909 - 101 + 33 + 303 + 9 - 1 = 6000 | | I guess my point is that the purpose of these problems is not to | separate out people who know specific tricks from people who | don't--its to separate out people who can reason their way | through difficult mathematical problems and people who can't. | chongli wrote: | The difference for you is that you're doing it as a fun | exercise. With contest math, you're drilling these formulas and | tricks so you can reproduce them quickly on a timed exam. If | you know both of the facts listed in the essay then you can | knock off this question in a minute or two. | | Trying to come up with everything from scratch could take a lot | longer and be very frustrating when you've got other problems | waiting for you to solve. | gowld wrote: | The problem (and linked solution is here) | | https://artofproblemsolving.com/wiki/index.php/2022_AIME_I_P... | | The totient formula isn't the hard part of the problem. | | The test has a very short time limit (for the difficulty of the | problems), and has many gruelingly complicated problems,so if | you dont have the formulas down cold, you'll burn out during | the contest. | | Of course, if you don't care about silly speed-mathing | contests, you can enjot the problems at a leisurely pace. | stefanpie wrote: | This personal account resonated with me since I also had some | personal experiences in both the "math competition" and | "competitive high school" world up until I graduated high school | in ~2018. | | --- | | I went to a middle school where I somehow ended up far ahead in | the curriculum due to my own interest in science and math, thanks | to my personal interests and parental support at the time. I | think I caught the attention of my math teachers and got to | participate in a county-wide middle school math competition with | some other students at my school. It was cool, and I wasn't, and | still am not, a super competitive person, so I thought it was a | fun experience to try; I don't think we won anything significant. | I also think I took an AIME-style competition exam (sit-down | test), but I don't remember much about it. All of this was cool | but not super interesting to me at the time. | | Some wise teacher or fellow parent at the time must have tipped | off my parents about Math Circles, and I am incredibly grateful | that my parents took me there. Math circles (at least in my | experience) are like local meetups for younger (usually non- | college) students to go and learn about cool exploratory and | advanced (non-standard curriculum) math topics from college | students and professors. I used to be so excited to go on | Saturdays to math circles and sit and watch an old professor from | a local college teach topics like logic, number theory, advanced | geometry, and other math topics that were definitely not taught | in my middle school. I also distinctly remember that I loved the | exploratory side of the math circles as opposed to competitive | math where I felt like I wouldn't learn anything and I had to get | everything correct. If you have kids who are curious about math | or even science, nature, and art, I would highly look into | whether there are Math Circles in your local area and at least | try it out. Some of my fondest memories during this time are from | Math Circles. | | I somehow ended up getting a full scholarship to attend a local | (non-religious) private school with one of the top competitive | high school math teams in the nation (among other | extracurriculars like debate, model UN, ...). The summer school | started there, and I won't forget when I went to the information | sessions for the math competition team. The "vibe" was very off | as soon as I walked in and not what I was expecting. The | competitiveness was very evident in your attendance and | performance in the multiple-times-a-week after-school math | competition classes, how the best get to be on the A and B teams, | and so on. I think I walked into it with the preconceived notion | that I was going to get to learn more math for fun by joining the | math team (like I did in math circles), but my naive worldview | was very much shattered. I think I attended one of the local math | competition events that first semester of high school and took | one of the sit-down style tests, but there was no way I scored | any kind of decent amount to be considered for anything related | to math competition at that school. I also had one good close | friend who stuck with math competition for the four years of high | school, and so I got to get an idea of what that was like, and it | was just as crazy as I thought it would be the whole time. I am | actually grateful for him since I also got to talk to that friend | about a lot of cool advanced math topics before I took those math | classes, as well as help me learn enough of the math ahead of | time to take the advanced AP physics classes (the electricity and | magnetism one) that I had genuine interest in. | | Luckily, by my second year, I was able to land on "science | research" (think liek a really competitive science fair, e.g., | ISEF) as a nice extracurricular I enjoyed. Even in that, you | cannot escape the competitive nature of it, but there are | alternative ways to branch out on your own (real publication, | working with local colleges and professors, just being able to | say I completed this cool research project and made this cool | thing) and put something on your "college resume" without having | to pigeonhole yourself into competing against other students all | the time. I did have to cycle through some other extracurriculars | (model UN and FRC robotics) where I "crashed and burned" before I | finally landed on one where I would feel "safe" in a sense to | enjoy what I was doing with research. | | Finally, the big push from the school onto the students to get | into the most prestigious schools they can get into really led to | some weird dynamics among students and really unhealthy kinds of | stress and anxiety to cope with. I think (but memories are fuzzy) | that I was able to dodge a lot of that just by the nature of not | being super competitive, but there were many students who would | lose their minds if they didn't get above a 90% on an exam in an | AP level class, as in genuinely freak out and stress over it and | then go to the teacher and try to sort it out. Any grade that | would jeopardize their perception of being smart or getting the | highest GPA possible to get into the best schools possible was an | anxiety and stress-inducing nightmare for them. There was very | much an idea that "I'm not going to tell everyone else what I got | on an exam" to also hide class rankings and your own GPA. I'm | also sure that none of us got any healthy amount of sleep needed; | there were people pushing insane courseloads with all AP classes | to pad their "college resumes." I remember taking some | architecture classes instead, which I found much more fulfilling | and fun, and then feeling out of place trying to talk to some of | my other classmates at the time who were trying to min-max their | GPA and college applications. | | --- | | Not to ramble on for too long, I just want to give an idea to | some readers of another related personal perspective on this | topic. Having been in some related environments in middle school | and high school, I can really empathize with some of the genuine, | agonizing, and sometimes lighthearted in hindsight, moments the | author experienced. I can't imagine what it's like in 2023/2024, | or even having kids in the future, what high school education | will be like. Can students really find peace and comfort to just | learn and pursue what interests them the most? | | Quick epilogue: I did apply to all the prestigious schools that | everyone else applied to (bless my parents for covering all the | unnecessary application fees), but also thanks to my parents' | pragmatism, I applied to some strong schools for engineering. I | ended up down the Ph.D. route, and the exploratory open-endedness | aspect of research is still what keeps me excited and happy in my | day-to-day work. | ByHookOrCrook wrote: | well you obviously weren't THAT far ahead since you went to | George Tech University instead of MIT or otherwise | | The author went to Stanford so what he experienced is 1000x | whatever you are talking about | ByHookOrCrook wrote: | Why does this guy act like he's so successful and genius? He | should feel bad that even though he graduated Stanford back in | 2009, he's only a senior software engineer at a random non-FAANG | company. | gowld wrote: | There's no evidence that being on the math team helped his | application. | | The people who win the math contests (And yes, who get into elite | schools because of it) enjoy practice. That's the secret. Tao | says the same thing about research mathematicians. | | The people who hate it don't do well and it doesn't help their | college applications. | | He mentions that he was the only one on high school team who | discovered how to triangulate a polygon, which is taught in | Geometry class (junior high school for him). | | Their bad attitude drags the team down. | legerdemain wrote: | I went to a combined middle/high school in a small city of | 200,000 in upstate New York, and no one on our Math League team | distinguished themselves in any way other than by transferring to | another nearby high school that had an actual IB program. At that | level of engagement, Math League was all right, just something | for a nerdy, unpopular teen to do to break up the monotony of | dreary upstate winter evenings. | | I'm more interested in this "Analysis II" the author mentions | taking in his freshman year. "Analysis II" at the undergraduate | level usually refers to a proof-based course on real-valued | functions of several variables. Basically, a retread of Calculus | III with a more rigorous foundation. But the author never | mentions any mathematical results from calculus and beyond, and | I'm under the impression that grade-school math competitions only | target subjects in arithmetic, elementary combinatorics, and | classical geometry. | ianbicking wrote: | In my high school the order of classes was, if I remember: | Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II/Trig, Analysis. Calculus was | still "after" high school at that time (early 90s), though | starting to become common. So Analysis was kind of pre- | calculus, a variety of different subjects that weren't quite | calculus. I remember bits of algebra, probability, compound | interest, etc. We didn't have Analysis I/II, but the boundaries | between Algebra and Analysis were so vague that it is easy to | imagine some split it differently. | | It seems quite unlikely the author was referring to Real | Analysis! Still I can't find nearly any reference to high | school Analysis (except https://calcworkshop.com/math- | analysis/), so I'm guessing that terminology is nearly gone | now. | neilv wrote: | Great, honest-sounding description of this college application | grind, doing things he wasn't interested in, and suggesting that | most of the other mathletes also weren't interested in math. | | Now that he's 15 years into a tech career, I'm wondering what he | thinks if/when interviewing applicants, and sees or doesn't see | similar grind on the resume. | | I imagine that some, if they got their position by virtue of the | hoop-jumping grind, would think that the grind was positive | signal for a candidate for that kind of position. But I don't | know how common that belief is. | | Reason I'm wondering... The last time I did a call with a FAANG | recruiter (for Staff/Principal SWE), they did something new, | running down a long list of checkboxes, and asking me for each | one whether I had it or not. Most of it sounded like college | application fodder, like people get coached to do in affluent | prep schools, including multiple checkboxes about mathlete | competitions. Not something that I would've thought would still | matter for someone with a big industry track record. Was | gathering this college app grind data _for experienced | candidates_ a new thing, or have recruiters and resume-scanning | software been filling out these properties of each candidate for | a long time? | jimbokun wrote: | I would want to find applicants more like the one mathlete who | was still doing mathematics past school years because he found | it deeply interesting. | | Then transferring that innate problem solving drive and aiming | it towards the problems and challenges facing the company. | neilv wrote: | I would be curious about that person, too, but devil's | advocate... | | How do you know you can aim that person's drive for math | towards company problems? | | Unless and until you know that, is it more positive signal to | look for people who, well, have solved company problems? | onetimeusename wrote: | I don't like name dropping the school I went to but I didn't have | the same high school experience as this writer. All of my peers | at my school seemingly did though which made me feel very behind | and out of place. I definitely noticed that a lot of the students | in the CS program already knew a good amount of discrete | mathematics when we took our 'first' proofs class. In fact, most | of the other kids went to really highly ranked high schools, | competed on math or programming or science teams, and had a lot | of accomplishments but it also simultaneously seemed | performative. I didn't even know competitive math was a thing | until I got to campus. I resented my parents for not pushing me | into all these extra-curriculars so I could be like everyone else | on campus and have things to brag about. But from the author's | experience there is a downside to being pushed into these things | too. | | Although the playing ground was actually fair and hard work gets | you on even footing, I have a couple of things to say about | college admissions. I will definitely say that although the top | universities claim to be meritocratic, I don't think they are. | Most of these students, maybe all now, are kind of acculturated | into this college admissions process where from a young age you | are doing STEM competitions and building letters of rec. A lot of | these kids have parents who move the whole family to be near to a | high school that can get their children into the top schools. | Most people in the US are not aware, or unable to do anything | with this specific cultural knowledge you need to get in to those | schools. Exceptions do not make the rule. So the top schools are | filled with people who don't reflect the country which is bad I | think. | | Second, as people have focused on STEM accomplishments just to | get in to the top schools, I think Goodhart's Law is in action | and that STEM competitions and precocious authorship is becoming | less meaningful but whether admissions offices change I don't | know if that will happen and has not yet. So these will continue | to be performative for the time being which is also unfortunate. | adelie wrote: | like the author, i burned out on the extracurricular grind | necessary to get into an elite college and as a result, spent | most of my university years severely depressed. | | for me, it was debate club. i liked debate, but the form of it i | participated in was a rich man's game and i was simply not a rich | man. i didn't have the money to fly to the east coast every | weekend to attend tournaments or pay people to assemble cases and | evidence briefs for me. it wasn't worth the coaches' time to even | listen to me practice because i wasn't wealthy enough to compete | at a high level. | | that feeling of futility persisted across other extracurriculars. | i participated in the science fair, but my advisor instantly | became dismissive when it became clear that my parents couldn't | gift me a competitive research opportunity at their lab or | hospital because they, y'know, didn't work at a lab or hospital. | the school i went to had a lot of rich kids; i once spotted one | of my classmates at the airport on their way to volunteer in | uganda over the summer. | | math team ended up my saving grace. perhaps it's because we | weren't quite so competitive - we did well regionally but were | not competitive at a state or national level - but there was | something freeing in just solving math problems. afterschool math | practice was free and open to everyone. there were a variety of | different competitions, team and individual, geared for different | skill levels and specializations. no one cared about what my | parents did for a living, thank god. it was just about solving | the damn math problem. | dexwiz wrote: | In my High School experience I encountered two styles of | knowledge competition. Quiz Bowl, which was essentially Jeopardy. | And Academic Super Bowl, which was like extra school. | | Quiz Bowl was full of a ton of smart kids with various interests. | We "practiced," but the only skill you could really develop was | being able to predict a question before it was finished so you | could be the first to answer. Questions varied widely from | competition to competition. One time we got to be on local TV to | compete, but there really wasn't a season or tournaments. It was | mostly 1 on 1 matches after school. Overall it was a ton of fun. | | Academic Super Bowl was also full of smart kids, but they were | more goal oriented. It was something you had to study for. Before | the competition you were given some categories, you assigned | categories to teammates, studied, and then competed at various | events. It was literally just more memorization. I got drafted to | do it one year the night before a competition, because I was The | Guy for a topic they needed a teammate for. It was awful. I | fumbled my way through because I didn't have near the detailed | knowledge required for the specific subcategory. I probably would | have done better if I had more time to prep. It was a big | tournaments, and at the end there were different prizes for | schools by various sizes. | | The type of kids in the two were varied. Everyone wanted to get | into a good college. The former seemed to love knowledge for the | sake of knowledge. While the later had a ton more grit, they | lacked passion in areas outside of directed study. The former | would read a book, because it was mentioned offhand in another | piece of media. The later would read a book because it was | assigned to them. | | Reading through this thread, it seems like people's experiences | of Math Competitions varies from one to the other. Having grit to | study and work at it gets you far, but having passion probably | gets you further. The issue is grit tends to be fungible while | passion is not. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-12-20 23:01 UTC)