[HN Gopher] I'm skeptical of low-code ___________________________________________________________________ I'm skeptical of low-code Author : jamghee Score : 25 points Date : 2023-12-30 15:51 UTC (7 hours ago) (HTM) web link (nick.scialli.me) (TXT) w3m dump (nick.scialli.me) | bazil376 wrote: | This to me is true for low code tools that are aimed at non- | developers. "You can write software without software developers!" | But low code tools made specifically to help developers' | workflows can be great. Maybe would be good for OP to clarify | type of low code tools | j45 wrote: | Less-code might be more realistic than low or no code. Hard not | to have platform lockin with zero or low code. | | As the other comment said, less code tools for developers can be | quite helpful. | ralusek wrote: | Code is a way of explaining rules. If you have a lot of | complicated rules, whatever system you use to represent it is | going to be complicated. Best case scenario for low code is when | the rules are simple or very predictable. In my experience, this | is very rarely the case, no matter how simple a problem seems | from the outset | kkfx wrote: | IMVHO the "low code" environment have a name: end-user | programming. The thing the entire entire industry have done it's | best to destroy it after Xerox, Symbolics. | | The rest is the nth failed tentative to makes users jailed by | ignorance selling the idea people can do thing without knowing | things. It will fail like any other tentative done before. ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2023-12-30 23:00 UTC)