[HN Gopher] Saturn's largest moon most likely uninhabitable ___________________________________________________________________ Saturn's largest moon most likely uninhabitable Author : wglb Score : 56 points Date : 2024-02-20 19:27 UTC (3 hours ago) (HTM) web link (phys.org) (TXT) w3m dump (phys.org) | renewiltord wrote: | I see. The reason for this is that insufficient surface organic | materials make it into the liquid water and the only kind of life | we know requires those two to combine. Unlucky, I suppose. Would | have been pretty cool! | generic92034 wrote: | Questions popping up in my mind: | | 1) Why are organic materials (probably any carbohydrates) only | supposed to come from the surface? Would it not be plausible to | assume that Titan's ocean ground contains significant amounts | of carbon? | | 2) Why do they assume that there are only dilution processes in | an ocean (surface or subsurface). There could be currents and | suboceanic terrain features concentrating carbon-rich water (at | least I do not know any reason against this). | RIMR wrote: | These are great points. It would be like if a race of flying | / buoyant aliens studied Earth's upper atmosphere, and | decided that it wasn't sufficient for life, while ignoring | that life isn't really found until you get to the surface, | and most of that life is found under the surface. | | There could be a habitable zone deep in Titan's oceans. I | don't even know if "habitable" is the right word, because the | concern seems greater to do with the genesis of life, not the | sustainability of existing life that might have existed on | Titan for millions of years already, from a time where | perhaps conditions were very different from what they are | today. | margalabargala wrote: | To be fair, the scientists that wrote the scientific | article came to no such conclusion. The "most likely | uninhabitable" thing is an invention of the popsci | journalist whose article was linked, not something | supported by the underlying journal article. | | The journal article asked the question "is the carbon | transferred from Titan's surface to its ocean sufficient, | on its own, to sustain a biosphere?" to which their answer | is "probably not". It explicitly does not claim there are | no other sources of carbon in the ocean, nor that Titan is | "probably uninhabitable". | margalabargala wrote: | The actual study this article is about is addressing a very | specific question. The article posted takes that specific | conclusion and applies it more generally, especially when | writing the headline. | | Titan has a methane atmosphere, due to prior outgassing from | its surface. Methane is destroyed by sunlight; i.e. over | time, the atmosphere is reacting with itself and sunlight to | form more complex carbon molecules, which fall out of the | atmosphere onto the surface. The study does not look at the | carbon content of the ocean itself, it simply evaluates | whether these complex carbon molecules, that we know are | forming in Titan's atmosphere through well-understood | processes, can also mix with the liquid ocean. | | As the ice sheet covering the ocean is at minimum 40km thick, | and over 100km thick in places, it is difficult for surface | molecules to penetrate. | | Whether or not other carbon sources, such as from within the | planet, contribute carbon to Titan's oceans are beyond the | scope of this study, and will remain beyond the scope of our | knowledge until we manage to place equipment on Titan capable | of drilling through tens of kilometers of ice. | | The actual paper concludes that carbon transfer from the | surface to the ocean is not sufficient to support a biosphere | _if that is the sole source of carbon_. It specifically calls | out "unless biologically available compounds can be sourced | from Titan's interior" as something that would allow a | biosphere. | | EDIT: link to article full text: https://www.researchgate.net | /publication/377929149_Organic_I... | generic92034 wrote: | Ah, I see. My bad for not drilling deeper and reading the | underlying study. In my eyes neglecting the inner planet as | source of carbon (only referring to the article here) is a | rather large gap. | | I am all for shooting some equipment up to Titan. Although | I am not sure we have the technology and the will to commit | resources to analyze Titan's oceans in detail, yet. | margalabargala wrote: | No worries. I think it's reasonable to expect that people | who write articles about journal articles would do a good | job describing their conclusions. The whole point is that | reading the underlying study _shouldn 't_ be necessary. | | I think this was an important study to be done, because | if the conclusion came out the other way, that would have | been very exciting. We would then be able to say "using | only the aspects of Titan we know for certain to be true, | we can model a plausible sustainable biosphere". | | A positive result would have been very promising, but | this negative result should not be seen as discouraging. | floxy wrote: | Anyone know the pressure at the top of Titan's ocean? (That | is, just under the ice) At first blush I was thinking it | might be pretty substantial for a submersible with that | much ice, but then the gravity is significantly less than | earth (0.138*g). Using: | | Pressure = density * g * h | | ...with density of water as 997 kg/m^3, g = 0.138 * 9.8 | m/s^2, and h = 40000 m, you get a pressure of ~540 | atmospheres. But I don't know if the ice sheet would have a | structural component that doesn't add as much as a naive | calculation would suggest. | pavlov wrote: | _> ' "One elephant per year of glycine into an ocean 12 times the | volume of Earth's oceans is not sufficient to sustain life," said | Neish. "In the past, people often assumed that water equals life, | but they neglected the fact that life needs other elements, in | particular carbon."'_ | | Titan's underground ocean is 12x larger than the Earth's oceans? | I had no idea. Wow. | | If this result holds, it's a shame because the gas giant moons | always seemed like the only chance of discovering some | interesting extraterrestrial life within my lifetime (or the next | few dozen generations -- the stars are incomprehensibly distant | and nearly impossible to visit). | NoMoreNicksLeft wrote: | Can't we send two elephants per year? Do they even have to be | elephants, or can we send plain glycine? | travisporter wrote: | Props to Neish - negative results would jeopardize the nasa | dragonfly mission (co-PI) but still got it published | RIMR wrote: | I don't disagree with the assumptions made here, but the | conclusion is bad. Titan is likely unihabitable for life _as we | know it_. There are plenty of extremophiles here on Earth that | live in places we wouldn 't expect life to exist, but we know | that they can because we found them. | | If we make conclusions that we cannot find life on Titan, then we | never will because we won't be looking. Life could be thriving on | Titan, but we won't know unless we look for ourselves. | | Also, for all we know, Titan's oceans are loaded with organic | compounds that are don't originate from the surface. We don't | know what the actual internal structure of Titan looks like | because we lack the data. | mbauman wrote: | Yeah, that's not at all what the actual journal article | claimed. It starts super simple: | | We know Titan has two things that seem so promising for life as | we know it! Organic compounds on the outside, liquid water on | the inside. | | And then it asks: | | Might those two promising things meet? Other work hasn't found | the tectonics that would do it; could cratering do it? | | And that very particular answer is pretty definitively no. | thriftwy wrote: | Titan is likely habitable for life as we know it. It's hard to | imagine why Titan won't have life around hydrothermal vents and | the like. | andrewstuart wrote: | Is there anyone on Earth who thinks it might have been habitable, | at -292 degrees Fahrenheit (-180 degrees Celsius). | | Its weird that there's any narrative at all around this. | dang wrote: | " _Please don 't post shallow dismissals, especially of other | people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something._" | | https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html | StanislavPetrov wrote: | There is a massive ocean of liquid water, which indicates that | it is substantially warmer than that. | margalabargala wrote: | There's a theory that life on Earth began at extremely cold | temperatures, yes; below -100F. | | https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/did-life-evolv... | | It's only Titan's surface that is at -292F, anyway, The theory | is that life, if it exists, would be present in the subsurface | ocean, which would be significantly warmer. | dougmwne wrote: | This doesn't seem to be a very meaningful theory to draw | conclusions about life. We have no idea how much carbon is | already present in Titan's ocean and if there's need for a water | cycle that connects to the surface. Also this study only | considers impact craters, not surface tectonics. And there could | be plenty of carbon sources from ocean floor interactions. | margalabargala wrote: | The journal authors agree with you. The "most likely | uninhabitable" conclusion is an invention of the popsci | article's author. | | The actual article's conclusion is basically "for there to be | life on Titan, there needs to be more carbon in the ocean than | would be transferred solely by surface impactors". It | absolutely does not rule out the existence of those carbon | source. | thereddaikon wrote: | As usual, the reporting on science ends up distorting or even | inventing conclusions out of thin air. | margalabargala wrote: | To quote the two concluding sentences of the journal | article: | | > It is unlikely that the calculated fluxes are sufficient | to maintain a detectable biosphere, unless the thickness of | organics on Titan's surface is greater than currently | estimated, abundant biomolecules are available from Titan's | rocky core, or surface biomolecules can be delivered to the | ocean by a process other than impact. Our calculations | suggest that despite Titan being the most organic-rich | ocean world in the Solar System, this does not | automatically imply an organic-rich and habitable ocean. | JoeAltmaier wrote: | Perhaps a historical impact could have been large enough to seed | the ocean. | andrewflnr wrote: | The abstract of the actual paper only claims: | | > Unless biologically available compounds can be sourced from | Titan's interior, or be delivered from the surface by other | mechanisms, our calculations suggest that even the most organic- | rich ocean world in the Solar System may not be able to support a | large biosphere. | | Which is much less sensationalist, to put it politely. | arp242 wrote: | Which is just a different way of saying "uninhabitable". | | The middle of the Sahara is uninhabitable. Unless you introduce | sufficient water and plants that is. | andrewflnr wrote: | It is not "just a different way". There's no reason to assume | impact melting from the surface is the only source of carbon | in Titan's ocean. The authors of the study seem clear on | this. I don't know why you feel the need to stand up for | phys.org on this, or why you think the Sahara is relevant. | pvaldes wrote: | > One elephant per year of glycine into an ocean 12 times the | volume of Earth's oceans is not sufficient to sustain life". | | This reasoning is too limited IMAO. Titan oceans may not have | whales, but for sure could still afford a lot of animals. | | 1) It seems that Titan has been there since the early phases of | solar system creation, so I'll assume that is older than 3 | billions of years (to pick a conservative value). One elephant a | year for 3 billions of years is still a lot. | | 2) Titan could have been bombed with much more matter on the | early phases of solar system history. | | 3) Live on earth is perfectly able to cope with a poor nutrient | aquatic environment. Most of the earth falls exactly on this | category after all. | | 4) Some life forms need just a little bit of carbon to be | functional. Earth has very big animals that are 99% water. | | 5) Cold water promotes slow metabolism. Life just adapts growing | really slow, being carried by currents, and adopting a | poiquiloterm life style. | vel0city wrote: | This is talking about estimated average comet/asteroid impacts, | right? If we're going by the average asteroid impacts on even | million-year timescales causing radical changes to a heavenly | body, we'd end up with no moon. | | I definitely get this is a limited research here, and I'm not | faulting it for that. Its good to know it seems like this kind of | cycle wouldn't be consistent in adding organic molecules to the | subsurface oceans. But let's not necessarily see this as "there's | no way organic molecules could have been pushed down in relevant | amounts." | deadbabe wrote: | Uninhabitable as in we couldn't introduce basic life forms there | even if we tried? | gweinberg wrote: | The article seems to treat speculation with more confidence than | it deserves, and also to report estimates with unjustified level | of precision. For example, it claims the annual amount of glycine | transferred to Titan is equal to the mass of "a male African | elephant" rather than simply an elephant. | fnordpiglet wrote: | I always find the metaphorical estimates in science reporting | absurd. I don't know why the mass of a male African elephant is | in any way more visceral than 6000 kg (btw a quick google | search gives a band of 1800 to 6300kg, which isn't particularly | precise). Given Titan is about 4.5 billion years old this could | be an enormous amount of complex carbon transferred from the | surface assuming it's more or less a one way process. | ramesh31 wrote: | There's always Europa ___________________________________________________________________ (page generated 2024-02-20 23:00 UTC)