(C) Alec Muffett's DropSafe blog.
Author Name: Alec Muffett
This story was originally published on allecmuffett.com. [1]
License: CC-BY-SA 3.0.[2]
 

Asking #ChatGPT: Could you please write 500 words in the style of a Daily Telegraph op-ed about whether the #OnlineSafetyBill will meet its objectives?

2022-12-02 11:19:56+00:00

The following response was generated by ChatGPT…

As the Online Safety Bill makes its way through Parliament, many are questioning whether it will be able to achieve its stated objectives. On the surface, the bill appears to be a well-intentioned effort to protect children from harmful content online. But upon closer examination, it becomes clear that the bill is misguided and will likely fail to achieve its goals.

One of the major problems with the bill is that it relies on an outdated understanding of the internet. The bill focuses on regulating social media companies and other online platforms, but it ignores the fact that the internet is a constantly evolving and decentralized technology. By the time the bill is passed and implemented, it is likely that many of the platforms it targets will no longer be the dominant players in the online landscape.

Additionally, the bill’s approach to regulating harmful content is overly broad and vague. It gives sweeping powers to the government to decide what constitutes harmful content, without providing clear criteria or safeguards to prevent abuse of those powers. This lack of specificity could lead to censorship and stifle freedom of expression.

Furthermore, the bill does not adequately address the root causes of the problem it seeks to solve. Instead of focusing on educating children and their parents about the potential dangers of the internet and how to use it safely, the bill takes a heavy-handed approach that is likely to be ineffective.

It is important to protect children from harmful content online, but the Online Safety Bill is not the way to do it. Instead of passing this flawed legislation, the government should focus on working with experts and stakeholders to develop targeted, evidence-based solutions that address the real challenges of online safety. Until then, the Online Safety Bill will remain a misguided and ineffective attempt to solve a complex problem.

I then asked it to generate a 600 word piece for the Spectator…

…and it regurgitated the above text, along with the following additional text:

Rather than trying to regulate the entire internet, the government should focus on providing resources and support to parents, schools, and other organizations to help them teach children how to use the internet safely and responsibly. This approach would empower individuals and communities to take control of their own online safety, rather than relying on a one-size-fits-all solution imposed by the government.

Moreover, the government should work with the technology industry to develop tools and technologies that can help protect children online. This could include better parental controls, safer search algorithms, and other innovations that can help parents and caregivers keep their children safe online.

In conclusion, the Online Safety Bill is a well-intentioned but misguided attempt to solve a complex problem. Instead of passing this flawed legislation, the government should focus on empowering individuals and communities to take control of their own online safety, and working with the technology industry to develop effective solutions. Only by adopting a more thoughtful and holistic approach can we hope to protect children from the dangers of the internet.

Summary

I agree with the robot.

Aside, this is not a cheat. I created a fresh OpenAI account (my first ever) and the above is the second question I asked:
[END]

[1] URL: https://alecmuffett.com/article/16448
[2] URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/

DropSafe Blog via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/alecmuffett/