(C) Wisconsin Watch This story was originally published by Wisconsin Watch and is unaltered. . . . . . . . . . . Why couldn’t a Wisconsin town hold a referendum on ATV use? [1] ['Bennet Goldstein', 'Wisconsin Watch', 'More Bennet Goldstein', 'Investigative Reporter', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img'] Date: 2024-05-20 11:00:00+00:00 Reading Time: 2 minutes During a town board meeting last year, residents in the town of Erin suggested holding an advisory referendum to gauge whether the community supported allowing all-terrain and utility vehicles on town roads. They learned such a plebiscite is no longer possible. Although Wisconsin residents can’t bypass the Legislature via a petition to enact — or reject — a new state law or amend the constitution, the situation varies at the municipal level. For instance, residents of Wisconsin cities and villages can, with some restrictions, establish or amend local ordinances by petition and popular vote. Previously, local governments could present advisory referendums to the electorate to gauge public opinion on nearly anything. Questions have addressed topics ranging from marijuana legalization to gerrymandering. But following a change to state law in June 2023, local county and municipal governments are now limited in the types of advisory questions they can ask voters. Subjects concerning proposed expenditures funded with property tax revenue, shared revenue, boundary changes, telecommunication and municipal cable service are OK. Everything else is off limits. The loss of local authority resulted from a provision tucked into a contentious omnibus bill introduced during the 2023-24 legislative session by Rep. Tony Kurtz, R-Wonewoc, and Sen. Mary Felzkowski, R-Tomahawk. The legislation overhauled shared revenue, repealed a property tax on business inventory and set conditions for a Milwaukee sales tax. It passed with bipartisan support, and Democratic Gov. Tony Evers signed it into law. Rep. Greta Neubauer, D-Racine, introduced an amendment that removed the measure from the bill, but lawmakers voted it down along party lines. Critics of local advisory referendums, including Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, said local measures inappropriately targeted policy matters, such as abortion, that are decided by the state. “It makes no sense to use the ballot as a way to try to achieve some interest group’s political goal,” Vos said at a Milwaukee Press Club event. “We should have had advisory referenda only for things that are directly related to what is being done in that municipality.” Matt Rothschild, then-executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, decried the measure as unconstitutional in written testimony submitted during a public hearing. “You are telling all of us that you don’t even want to hear from us and that we can’t even express ourselves in advisory referendums on public issues through our local governments,” he said. The power to present non-binding ballot questions to the electorate is still granted to the Wisconsin Legislature. During the 2023 spring election, ballots contained an advisory question concerning welfare benefit work requirements, which voters overwhelmingly supported. Wisconsin Watch readers have submitted questions to our statehouse team, and we’ll answer them in our series, Ask Wisconsin Watch. Have a question about state government? Ask it here. Republish This Story Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license. Close window X Republish this article This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Scroll down to copy and paste the code of our article into your CMS. The codes for images, graphics and other embeddable elements may not transfer exactly as they appear on our site. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles for free using the following ground rules. Credit should be given, in this format: “By Dee J. Hall, Wisconsin Watch” Editing material is prohibited, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and in-house style (for example, using “Waunakee, Wis.” instead of “Waunakee” or changing “yesterday” to “last week”) Other than minor cosmetic and font changes, you may not change the structural appearance or visual format of a story. If published online, you must include the links and link to wisconsinwatch.org If you share the story on social media, please mention @wisconsinwatch (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram), and ensure that the original featured image associated with the story is visible on the social media post. Don’t sell the story or any part of it — it may not be marketed as a product. Don’t extract, store or resell Wisconsin Watch content as a database. Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads. Your website must include a prominent way to contact you. Additional elements that are packaged with our story must be labeled. Users can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements ONLY with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use. If we send you a request to change or remove Wisconsin Watch content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles forusing the following ground rules. For questions regarding republishing rules please contact Jeff Bauer, digital editor and producer, at jbauer@wisconsinwatch.org Why couldn’t a southeast Wisconsin town hold an advisory referendum on ATV/UTV use on local roads?

Why couldn’t a southeast Wisconsin town hold an advisory referendum on ATV/UTV use on local roads?

by Bennet Goldstein / Wisconsin Watch, Wisconsin Watch
May 20, 2024

During a town board meeting last year, residents in the town of Erin suggested holding an advisory referendum to gauge whether the community supported allowing all-terrain and utility vehicles on town roads. They learned such a plebiscite is no longer possible.

Although Wisconsin residents can’t bypass the Legislature via a petition to enact — or reject — a new state law or amend the constitution, the situation varies at the municipal level.

For instance, residents of Wisconsin cities and villages can, with some restrictions, establish or amend local ordinances by petition and popular vote.

Previously, local governments could present advisory referendums to the electorate to gauge public opinion on nearly anything. Questions have addressed topics ranging from marijuana legalization to gerrymandering.

But following a change to state law in June 2023, local county and municipal governments are now limited in the types of advisory questions they can ask voters. Subjects concerning proposed expenditures funded with property tax revenue, shared revenue, boundary changes, telecommunication and municipal cable service are OK. Everything else is off limits.

The loss of local authority resulted from a provision tucked into a contentious omnibus bill introduced during the 2023-24 legislative session by Rep. Tony Kurtz, R-Wonewoc, and Sen. Mary Felzkowski, R-Tomahawk. The legislation overhauled shared revenue, repealed a property tax on business inventory and set conditions for a Milwaukee sales tax. It passed with bipartisan support, and Democratic Gov. Tony Evers signed it into law.

Rep. Greta Neubauer, D-Racine, introduced an amendment that removed the measure from the bill, but lawmakers voted it down along party lines.

Critics of local advisory referendums, including Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, R-Rochester, said local measures inappropriately targeted policy matters, such as abortion, that are decided by the state.

“It makes no sense to use the ballot as a way to try to achieve some interest group’s political goal,” Vos said at a Milwaukee Press Club event. “We should have had advisory referenda only for things that are directly related to what is being done in that municipality.”

Matt Rothschild, then-executive director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, decried the measure as unconstitutional in written testimony submitted during a public hearing.

“You are telling all of us that you don't even want to hear from us and that we can't even express ourselves in advisory referendums on public issues through our local governments,” he said.

The power to present non-binding ballot questions to the electorate is still granted to the Wisconsin Legislature. During the 2023 spring election, ballots contained an advisory question concerning welfare benefit work requirements, which voters overwhelmingly supported.

This article first appeared on Wisconsin Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons license. Copy to Clipboard [END] --- [1] Url: https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/05/wisconsin-referendum-advisory-vote-ballot-atv-utv/ Published and (C) by Wisconsin Watch Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0 Intl. via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds: gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/wisconsinwatch/