(C) Wisconsin Watch
This story was originally published by Wisconsin Watch and is unaltered.
. . . . . . . . . .
Milwaukee's SDC: Inconsistent meeting notices raise concerns [1]
['Meredith Melland', 'Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service', 'More Meredith Melland', 'Wisconsin Watch', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Coauthors.Is-Layout-Flow', 'Class', 'Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus', 'Display Inline', '.Wp-Block-Co-Authors-Plus-Avatar', 'Where Img']
Date: 2024-06-20 16:40:19+00:00
Reading Time: 4 minutes
Michael Harper attended a Social Development Commission board meeting on May 16 to find out how the board is charting a path forward after the agency suspended operations in late April.
A small business owner who ran for Milwaukee County comptroller in the spring, Harper has relationships with contractors who have worked with SDC.
He said there has been little disclosed from SDC on how community members can access information about the board’s work and meetings. He only discovered the May 16 meeting from contacting SDC’s attorney William Sulton.
“Having chaired boards before, the first thing I thought of was like: Man, where was the meeting notification?” Harper said.
Since mid-April, the SDC Board of Commissioners has met more frequently than its usual monthly meeting schedule to develop a strategic plan to reorganize SDC’s many anti-poverty programs and pay its employees.
Related Story ‘It’s heartbreaking’: Milwaukee residents, vendors left in limbo after Social Development Commission’s shutdown Many services have remained in limbo since the Social Development Commission’s weatherization program was suspended in March for misallocation of funds and the organization as a whole suspended operations in late April.
Torre Johnson Sr., a program manager for Wisconsin Community Services and a former elected SDC commissioner for District 4, said people have contacted him with questions about SDC and its services.
He is unsure of how to direct them because he has not seen or heard communication from the board on its meetings or plans.
“When is the board meeting so we can (sit in) and see what’s happening?” he asked.
Wisconsin open meetings law requires government bodies to notify the public at least 24 hours in advance of meetings, or two hours in advance in special cases, so community members have an option to participate.
SDC is meeting only part of the law’s notice requirements, experts say. SDC has alerted news media, a newspaper of record and some individuals of upcoming board meetings but has failed to consistently notify the public at large of its Board of Commissioners meetings since the agency closed.
Open meetings law requirements
Wisconsin open meetings law requires public notice of all meetings of a governmental body to be communicated to the public, to news media that have requested to be notified and to the official newspaper, or if there is none, a news medium likely to give notice in the area.
A meeting notice needs to contain the time, location and subject matter of the meeting, which is typically presented in the form of an agenda, said Tom Kamenick, an attorney and founder and president of the Wisconsin Transparency Project.
To notify the public, the law requires the chief presiding officer of a governmental body or its designee to give notice in one of three ways: physically posting a notice in three public places, posting a notice in one public place and to the government body’s website, or by “paid publication to a news medium likely to give notice to persons affected,” according to Wisconsin statute.
How is SDC subject to open meetings law?
Open meetings law applies to governmental bodies and “quasi-governmental” agencies like SDC, which is an intergovernmental commission established in 1963 under Wisconsin Statute 66.0125.
Milwaukee County and the city of Milwaukee both have ordinances that reference this state statute in establishing the creation of SDC and directly mention that meetings of the commission and its consulting committees are public and subject to open meetings law.
What SDC is doing to give notice
When asked about SDC’s meeting notice policies after a recent board meeting, board chair Barbara Toles referred questions to Sulton.
Sulton said SDC has notified members of new media organizations, including the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, four local TV news stations and other outlets that have requested notice to share meeting information with the public.
The board’s meeting agendas have not been published on the SDC’s website since the agency laid off its staff.
Related Story Milwaukee’s Social Development Commission has not paid laid-off employees. Now they seek answers. Milwaukee’s Social Development Commission, or SDC, suspended its operations and laid off its entire staff at the end of April.
A notice was posted physically on the SDC’s main office on North Avenue for one recent meeting, Sulton said, but he is not aware of any other SDC meeting notice postings in public places or a paid notice to a newspaper.
“I think that there’s at least substantial compliance to the law, but if there were some errors, the errors are unintentional and caused by the lack of staff who would ordinarily be doing those tasks for the board,” Sulton said.
Differences between notifying media and the public
Since all SDC employees have been laid off and board members are volunteers, Sulton said the board is working under difficult circumstances and does not have access to the SDC’s website to post a meeting agenda.
Sulton said he believes SDC is meeting the law’s notice requirements by providing agendas and meeting links to Milwaukee Journal Sentinel staff.
“The law doesn’t require anything more than making a well-circulated news outlet available, and in Milwaukee, the Journal Sentinel certainly meets that standard,” Sulton said.
Notifying the news media and a newspaper meets some of the law’s requirements but does not satisfy it completely, Kamenick said, because a governmental body still needs to meet one of the law’s three options focused specifically on informing the public.
“They are hard requirements, and there’s a strict requirement that (a government body) follow it precisely,” Kamenick said.
Sulton said he would relay concerns about meeting notices to the board and asked about a practical remedy.
“It can’t be that we want to make it harder for the board to solve problems here,” he said.
Stressing the need for openness, Bill Lueders, president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, said, “As a quasi-governmental agency that provides vital services to people’s lives, the Social Development Commission has an affirmative responsibility to be as transparent as possible about the events leading to its recent shutdown.”
Board committed to public access
In addition to providing notice to media organizations, SDC commissioners have also circulated meeting agendas to state and local government offices and the organizations they represent, Sulton said.
“We also have members of the public and former employees who have asked for agendas and meeting links and have been provided that information,” Sulton said.
He also said that the board’s meetings are hybrid and that the board has kept the Zoom link and login information the same in recent weeks to make the virtual meeting more accessible.
“We’re trying to provide information to the public,” Sulton said. “We’re trying to offer the public an opportunity to ask questions and queries and comments.”
Trisha Young contributed to this report, which was originally published by Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service, a nonprofit news organization that covers Milwaukee’s diverse neighborhoods..
News414 is a service journalism collaboration between Wisconsin Watch and Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service that addresses the specific issues, interests, perspectives and information needs identified by residents of central city Milwaukee neighborhoods. Learn more at our website or sign up for our texting service here.
Republish This Story Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Close window X Republish this article This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Scroll down to copy and paste the code of our article into your CMS. The codes for images, graphics and other embeddable elements may not transfer exactly as they appear on our site. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles for free using the following ground rules. Credit should be given, in this format: “By Dee J. Hall, Wisconsin Watch”
Editing material is prohibited, except to reflect relative changes in time, location and in-house style (for example, using “Waunakee, Wis.” instead of “Waunakee” or changing “yesterday” to “last week”)
Other than minor cosmetic and font changes, you may not change the structural appearance or visual format of a story.
If published online, you must include the links and link to wisconsinwatch.org
If you share the story on social media, please mention @wisconsinwatch (Twitter, Facebook and Instagram), and ensure that the original featured image associated with the story is visible on the social media post.
Don’t sell the story or any part of it — it may not be marketed as a product.
Don’t extract, store or resell Wisconsin Watch content as a database.
Don’t sell ads against the story. But you can publish it with pre-sold ads.
Your website must include a prominent way to contact you.
Additional elements that are packaged with our story must be labeled.
Users can republish our photos, illustrations, graphics and multimedia elements ONLY with stories with which they originally appeared. You may not separate multimedia elements for standalone use.
If we send you a request to change or remove Wisconsin Watch content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately. *** Also, the code below will NOT copy the featured image on the page. You are welcome to download the main image as a separate element for publication with this story. *** You are welcome to republish our articles forusing the following ground rules. For questions regarding republishing rules please contact Jeff Bauer, digital editor and producer, at jbauer@wisconsinwatch.org Inconsistent meeting notices from Milwaukee’s Social Development Commission raise transparency concerns Inconsistent meeting notices from Milwaukee’s Social Development Commission raise transparency concerns
by Meredith Melland / Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service, Wisconsin Watch
June 20, 2024
Michael Harper attended a Social Development Commission board meeting on May 16 to find out how the board is charting a path forward after the agency suspended operations in late April.
A small business owner who ran for Milwaukee County comptroller in the spring, Harper has relationships with contractors who have worked with SDC.
He said there has been little disclosed from SDC on how community members can access information about the board’s work and meetings. He only discovered the May 16 meeting from contacting SDC’s attorney William Sulton.
“Having chaired boards before, the first thing I thought of was like: Man, where was the meeting notification?” Harper said.
Since mid-April, the SDC Board of Commissioners has met more frequently than its usual monthly meeting schedule to develop a strategic plan to reorganize SDC’s many anti-poverty programs and pay its employees.
Torre Johnson Sr., a program manager for Wisconsin Community Services and a former elected SDC commissioner for District 4, said people have contacted him with questions about SDC and its services.
He is unsure of how to direct them because he has not seen or heard communication from the board on its meetings or plans.
“When is the board meeting so we can (sit in) and see what’s happening?” he asked.
Wisconsin open meetings law requires government bodies to notify the public at least 24 hours in advance of meetings, or two hours in advance in special cases, so community members have an option to participate.
SDC is meeting only part of the law’s notice requirements, experts say. SDC has alerted news media, a newspaper of record and some individuals of upcoming board meetings but has failed to consistently notify the public at large of its Board of Commissioners meetings since the agency closed.
Open meetings law requirements
Wisconsin open meetings law requires public notice of all meetings of a governmental body to be communicated to the public, to news media that have requested to be notified and to the official newspaper, or if there is none, a news medium likely to give notice in the area.
A meeting notice needs to contain the time, location and subject matter of the meeting, which is typically presented in the form of an agenda, said Tom Kamenick, an attorney and founder and president of the Wisconsin Transparency Project.
To notify the public, the law requires the chief presiding officer of a governmental body or its designee to give notice in one of three ways: physically posting a notice in three public places, posting a notice in one public place and to the government body’s website, or by “paid publication to a news medium likely to give notice to persons affected,” according to Wisconsin statute.
How is SDC subject to open meetings law?
Open meetings law applies to governmental bodies and “quasi-governmental” agencies like SDC, which is an intergovernmental commission established in 1963 under Wisconsin Statute 66.0125.
Milwaukee County and the city of Milwaukee both have ordinances that reference this state statute in establishing the creation of SDC and directly mention that meetings of the commission and its consulting committees are public and subject to open meetings law.
What SDC is doing to give notice
When asked about SDC’s meeting notice policies after a recent board meeting, board chair Barbara Toles referred questions to Sulton.
Sulton said SDC has notified members of new media organizations, including the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, four local TV news stations and other outlets that have requested notice to share meeting information with the public.
The board’s meeting agendas have not been published on the SDC’s website since the agency laid off its staff.
A notice was posted physically on the SDC’s main office on North Avenue for one recent meeting, Sulton said, but he is not aware of any other SDC meeting notice postings in public places or a paid notice to a newspaper.
“I think that there’s at least substantial compliance to the law, but if there were some errors, the errors are unintentional and caused by the lack of staff who would ordinarily be doing those tasks for the board,” Sulton said.
Differences between notifying media and the public
Since all SDC employees have been laid off and board members are volunteers, Sulton said the board is working under difficult circumstances and does not have access to the SDC’s website to post a meeting agenda.
Sulton said he believes SDC is meeting the law’s notice requirements by providing agendas and meeting links to Milwaukee Journal Sentinel staff.
“The law doesn’t require anything more than making a well-circulated news outlet available, and in Milwaukee, the Journal Sentinel certainly meets that standard,” Sulton said.
Notifying the news media and a newspaper meets some of the law’s requirements but does not satisfy it completely, Kamenick said, because a governmental body still needs to meet one of the law’s three options focused specifically on informing the public.
“They are hard requirements, and there’s a strict requirement that (a government body) follow it precisely,” Kamenick said.
Sulton said he would relay concerns about meeting notices to the board and asked about a practical remedy.
“It can’t be that we want to make it harder for the board to solve problems here,” he said.
Stressing the need for openness, Bill Lueders, president of the Wisconsin Freedom of Information Council, said, “As a quasi-governmental agency that provides vital services to people’s lives, the Social Development Commission has an affirmative responsibility to be as transparent as possible about the events leading to its recent shutdown.”
Board committed to public access
In addition to providing notice to media organizations, SDC commissioners have also circulated meeting agendas to state and local government offices and the organizations they represent, Sulton said.
“We also have members of the public and former employees who have asked for agendas and meeting links and have been provided that information,” Sulton said.
He also said that the board’s meetings are hybrid and that the board has kept the Zoom link and login information the same in recent weeks to make the virtual meeting more accessible.
“We’re trying to provide information to the public,” Sulton said. “We’re trying to offer the public an opportunity to ask questions and queries and comments.”
Trisha Young contributed to this report, which was originally published by Milwaukee Neighborhood News Service, a nonprofit news organization that covers Milwaukee’s diverse neighborhoods..
This article first appeared on Wisconsin Watch and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.
Copy to Clipboard
[END]
---
[1] Url: https://wisconsinwatch.org/2024/06/milwaukee-sdc-open-meeting-law-social-development-commission/
Published and (C) by Wisconsin Watch
Content appears here under this condition or license: Creative Commons BY-ND 4.0 Intl.
via Magical.Fish Gopher News Feeds:
gopher://magical.fish/1/feeds/news/wisconsinwatch/