Chapter Twelve. PRESENT-DAY CHINA

     
     
      1 The growth of communism
      In order to understand today's China, we have to go back in time to report events which were cut short or left out of our earlier discussion in order to present them in the context of this chapter.
      Although socialism and communism had been known in China long ago, this line of development of Western philosophy had interested Chinese intellectuals much less than liberalistic, democratic Western ideas. It was widely believed that communism had no real prospects for China, as a dictatorship of the proletariat seemed to be relevant only in a highly industrialized and not in an agrarian society. Thus, in its beginning the “Movement of May Fourth” of 1919 had Western ideological traits but was not communistic. This changed with the success of communism in Russia and with the theoretical writings of Lenin. Here it was shown that communist theories could be applied to a country similar to China in its level of development. Already from 1919 on, some of the leaders of the Movement turned towards communism: the National University of Peking became the first centre of this movement, and Ch'en Tu-hsiu, then dean of the College of Letters, from 1920 on became one of its leaders. Hu Shih did not move to the left with this group; he remained a liberal. But another well-known writer, Lu Hsuen (1881-1936), while following Hu Shih in the “Literary Revolution,” identified politically with Ch'en. There was still another man, the Director of the University Library, Li Ta-chao, who turned towards communism. With him we find one of his employees in the Library, Mao Tse-tung. In fact, the nucleus of the Communist Party, which was officially created as late as 1921, was a student organization including some professors in Peking. On the other hand, a student group in Paris had also learned about communism and had organized; the leaders of this group were Chou En-lai and Li Li-san. A little later, a third group organized in Germany; Chu Te belonged to this group. The leadership of Communist China since 1949 has been in the hands of men of these three former student groups.
      After 1920, Sun Yat-sen, too, became interested in the developments in Soviet Russia. Yet, he never actually became a communist; his belief that the soil should belong to the tiller cannot really be combined with communism, which advocates the abolition of individual land-holdings. Yet, Soviet Russia found it useful to help Sun Yat-sen and advised the Chinese Communist Party to collaborate with the KMT (Kuomintang). This collaboration, not always easy, continued until the fall of Shanghai in 1927.
      In the meantime, Mao Tse-tung had given up his studies in Peking and had returned to his home in Hunan. Here, he organized his countrymen, the farmers of Hunan. It is said that at the verge of the northern expedition of Chiang Kai-shek, Mao's adherents in Hunan already numbered in the millions; this made the quick and smooth advance of the communist-advised armies of Chiang Kai-shek possible. Mao developed his ideas in written form in 1927; he showed that communism in China could be successful only if it was based upon farmers. Because of this unorthodox attitude, he was for years severely attacked as a deviationist.
      When Chiang Kai-shek separated from the KMT in 1927, the main body of the KMT remained in Hankow as the legal government. But now, while Chiang Kai-shek executed all leftists, union leaders, and communists who fell into his hands, tensions in Hankow increased between the Chinese Communist Party and the rest of the KMT. Finally, the KMT turned against the communists and reunited with Chiang Kai-shek. The remaining communists retreated to the Hunan-Kiangsi border area, the centre of Mao's activities; even the orthodox communist wing, which had condemned Mao, now had to come to him for protection from the KMT. A small communist state began to develop in Kiangsi, in spite of pressure and, later, attacks of the KMT against them. By 1934, this pressure became so strong that Kiangsi had to be abandoned, and in the epic “Long March” the rest of the communists and their army fought their way through all of western and north-western China into the sparsely inhabited, underdeveloped northern part of Shensi, where a new socialistic state was created with Yen-an as its capital.
      After the fall of the communist enclave in Kiangsi, the prospects for the Nationalist regime were bright; indeed, the unification of China was almost achieved. At this moment a new Japanese invasion threatened and demanded the full attention of the regime. Thus, in spite of talk about land reform and other reforms which might have led to a liberalization of the government, no attention was given to internal and social problems except to the suppression of communist thought. Although all leftist publications were prohibited, most historians and sociologists succeeded in writing Marxist books without using Marxist terminology, so that they escaped Chiang's censors. These publications contributed greatly to preparing China's intellectuals and youth for communism.
      When the Japanese War began, the communists in Yen-an and the Nationalists under Chiang Kai-shek agreed to co-operate against the invaders. Yet, each side remembered its experiences in 1927 and distrusted the other. Chiang's resistance against the invaders became less effective after the Japanese occupied all of China's ports; supplies could reach China only in small quantities by airlift or via the Burma Road. There was also the belief that Japan could be defeated only by an attack on Japan itself and that this would have to be undertaken by the Western powers, not by China. The communists, on their side, set up a guerrilla organization behind the Japanese lines, so that, although the Japanese controlled the cities and the lines of communication, they had little control over the countryside. The communists also attempted to infiltrate the area held by the Nationalists, who in turn were interested in preventing the communists from becoming too strong; so, Nationalist troops guarded also the borders of communist territory.
      American politicians and military advisers were divided in their opinions. Although they recognized the internal weakness of the Nationalist government, the fighting between cliques within the government, and the ever-increasing corruption, some advocated more help to the Nationalists and a firm attitude against the communists. Others, influenced by impressions gained during visits to Yen-an, and believing in the possibility of honest co-operation between a communist regime and any other, as Roosevelt did, attempted to effect a coalition of the Nationalists with the communists.
      At the end of the war, when the Nationalist government took over the administration, it lacked popular support in the areas liberated from the Japanese. Farmers who had been given land by the communists, or who had been promised it, were afraid that their former landlords, whether they had remained to collaborate with the Japanese or had fled to West China, would regain control of the land. Workers hoped for new social legislation and rights. Businessmen and industrialists were faced with destroyed factories, worn-out or antiquated equipment, and an unchecked inflation which induced them to shift their accounts into foreign banks or to favour short-term gains rather than long-term investments. As in all countries which have suffered from a long war and an occupation, the youth believed that the old regime had been to blame, and saw promise and hope on the political left. And, finally, the Nationalist soldiers, most of whom had been separated for years from their homes and families, were not willing to fight other Chinese in the civil war now well under way; they wanted to go home and start a new life. The communists, however, were now well organized militarily and well equipped with arms surrendered by the Japanese to the Soviet armies as well as with arms and ammunition sold to them by KMT soldiers; moreover, they were constantly strengthened by deserters from the KMT. The civil war witnessed a steady retreat by the KMT armies, which resisted only sporadically. By the end of 1948, most of mainland China was in the hands of the communists, who established their new capital in Peking.
      2 Nationalist China in Taiwan
      The Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan with those soldiers who remained loyal. This island was returned to China after the defeat of Japan, though final disposition of its status had not yet been determined.
      Taiwan's original population had been made up of more than a dozen tribes who are probably distant relatives of tribes in the Philippines. These are Taiwan's “aborigines,” altogether about 200,000 people in 1948.
      At about the time of the Sung dynasty, Chinese began to establish outposts on the island; these developed into regular agricultural settlements toward the end of the Ming dynasty. Immigration increased in the eighteenth and especially the nineteenth centuries. These Chinese immigrants and their descendants are the “Taiwanese,” Taiwan's main population of about eight million people as of 1948.
      Taiwan was at first a part of the province of Fukien, whence most of its Chinese settlers came; there was also a minority of Hakka, Chinese from Kuangtung province. When Taiwan was ceded to Japan, it was still a colonial area with much lawlessness and disorder, but with a number of flourishing towns and a growing population. The Japanese, who sent administrators but no settlers, established law and order, protected the aborigines from land-hungry Chinese settlers, and attempted to abolish headhunting by the aborigines and to raise the cultural level in general. They built a road and railway system and strongly stressed the production of sugar cane and rice. During the Second World War, the island suffered from air attacks and from the inability of the Japanese to protect its industries.
      After Chiang Kai-shek and the remainder of his army and of his government officials arrived in Taiwan, they were followed by others fleeing from the communist regime, mainly from Chekiang, Kiangsu, and the northern provinces of the mainland. Eventually, there were on Taiwan about two million of these “mainlanders,” as they have sometimes been called.
      When the Chinese Nationalists took over from the Japanese, they assumed all the leading positions in the government. The Taiwanese nationals who had opposed the Japanese were disappointed; for their part, the Nationalists felt threatened because of their minority position. The next years, especially up to 1952, were characterized by terror and bloodshed. Tensions persisted for many years, but have lessened since about 1960.
      The new government of Taiwan resembled China's pre-war government under Chiang Kai-shek. First, to maintain his claim to the legitimate rule of all of China, Chiang retained—and controlled through his party, the KMT—his former government organization, complete with cabinet ministers, administrators, and elected parliament, under the name “Central Government of China.” Secondly, the actual government of Taiwan, which he considered one of China's provinces, was organized as the “Provincial Government of Taiwan,” whose leading positions were at first in the hands of KMT mainlanders. There have since been elections for the provincial assembly, for local government councils and boards, and for various provincial and local positions. Thirdly, the military forces were organized under the leadership and command of mainlanders. And finally, the education system was set up in accordance with former mainland practices by mainland specialists. However, evolutionary changes soon occurred.
      The government's aim was to make Mandarin Chinese the language of all Chinese in Taiwan, as it had been in mainland China long before the War, and to weaken the Taiwanese dialects. Soon almost every child had a minimum of six years of education (increased in 1968 to nine years), with Mandarin Chinese as the medium of instruction. In the beginning few Taiwanese qualified as teachers because, under Japanese rule, Japanese had been the medium of instruction. As the children of Taiwanese and mainland families went to school together, the Taiwanese children quickly learned Mandarin, while most mainland children became familiar with the Taiwan dialect. For the generation in school today, the difference between mainlander and Taiwanese has lost its importance. At the same time, more teachers of Taiwanese origin, but with modern training, have begun to fill first the ranks of elementary, later of high-school, and now even of university instructors, so that the end of mainland predominance in the educational system is foreseeable.
      The country is still ruled by the KMT, but although at first hardly any Taiwanese belonged to the Party, many of the elective jobs and almost all positions in the provincial government are at present (1969) in the hands of Taiwanese independents, or KMT members, more of whom are entering the central government as well. Because military service is compulsory, the majority of common soldiers are Taiwanese: as career officers grow older and their sons show little interest in an army career, more Taiwan-Chinese are occupying higher army positions. Foreign policy and major political decisions still lie in the hands of mainland Chinese, but economic power, once monopolized by them, is now held by Taiwan-Chinese.
      This shift gained impetus with the end of American economic aid, which had tied local businessmen to American industry and thus worked to the advantage of mainland Chinese, for these had contacts in the United States, whereas the Taiwan-Chinese had contacts only in Japan. After the termination of American economic aid, Taiwanese trade with Japan, the Philippines, and Korea grew in importance and with it the economic strength of Taiwan-Chinese businessmen. After 1964, Taiwan became a strong competitor of Hong Kong and Japan in some export industries, such as electronics and textiles. We can regard Taiwan from 1964 on as occupying the “takeoff” stage, to use Rostow's terminology—a stage of rapid development of new, principally light and consumer, industries. There has been a rapid rise of industrial towns around the major cities, and there are already many factories in the countryside, even in some villages. Electrification is essentially completed, and heavy industries, such as fertilizer and assembly plants and oil refineries, now exist.
      This rapid industrialization was accompanied by an unusually fast development of agriculture. A land-reform program limited land ownership, reduced rents, and redistributed formerly Japanese-owned land. This was the program that the Nationalist government had attempted unsuccessfully to enforce in liberated China after the Pacific War. It is well known that the abolition of landlordism and the distribution of land to small farmers do not in themselves improve or enlarge production. The Joint Council on Rural Reconstruction, on which American advisers worked with Chinese specialists to devise a system comparable to American agricultural extension services but possessing added elements of community development, introduced better seeds, more and better fertilizers, and numerous other innovations which the farmers quickly adopted, with the result that the island became self-supporting, in spite of a steadily growing population (thirteen million in 1968).
      At the same time, the government succeeded in stabilizing the currency and in eliminating corruption, thus re-establishing public confidence and security. Good incomes from farming as well as from industries were invested on the island instead of flowing into foreign banks. In addition, the population had enough surplus money to buy the products of the new domestic industries as these appeared. Thus, the industrialization of Taiwan may be called “industrialization without tears,” without the suffering, that is, of proletarian masses who produce objects which they cannot afford for themselves. Today, even lower middle-class families have television consoles which cost the equivalent of US $200; they own electric fans and radios; they are buying Taiwan-produced refrigerators and air conditioners; and more and more think of buying Taiwan-assembled cars. They encourage their children to finish high school and to attend college if at all possible; competition for admission is very strong in spite of the continuous building of new schools and universities. Education to the level of the B.A. is of good quality, but for most graduate study students are still sent abroad. Taiwan complains about the “brain drain,” as about 93 per cent of its students who go overseas do not return, but in many fields it has sufficient trained manpower to continue its development, and in any case there would not be enough jobs available if all the students returned. Most of these expatriates would be available to develop mainland China, if conditions there were to change in a way that would make them compatible with the values with which these expatriates grew up on Taiwan, or with the Western democratic values which they absorbed abroad.
      Chiang Kai-shek's government still hopes that one day its people will return to the mainland. This hope has changed from hope of victory in a civil war to hope of revolutionary developments within Communist China which might lead to the creation of a more liberal government in which men with KMT loyalties could find a place. Because they are Chinese, the present government and, it is believed, the majority of the people, consider themselves a part of China from which they are temporarily separated. Therefore they reject the idea, proposed by some American politicians, that Taiwan should become an independent state. There are, mainly in the United States and Japan, groups of Taiwan-Chinese who favour an independent Taiwan, which naturally would be close to Japan politically and economically. One may agree with their belief that Taiwan, now larger than many European countries, could exist and flourish as an independent country; yet few Chinese will wish to divorce themselves from the world's largest society.
      3 Communist China
      Both Taiwan and mainland China have developed extremely quickly. The reasons do not seem to lie solely in the form of government, for the pre-conditions for a “takeoff” existed in China as early as the 1920's, if not earlier. That is, the quick development of China could have started forty years ago but was prevented, primarily for political reasons. One of the main pre-conditions for quick development is that a large part of the population is inured to hard and repetitive work. The Chinese farmer was accustomed to such work; he put more time and energy into his land than any other farmer. He and his fellows were the industrial workers of the future: reliable, hard-working, tractable, intelligent. To train them was easy, and absenteeism was never a serious problem, as it is in other developing nations. Another pre-condition is the existence of sufficient trained people to manage industry. Forty years ago China had enough such men to start modernization; foreign assistance would have been necessary in some fields, but only briefly.
      Another requirement (at least in the period before radio and television) is general literacy. Meaningful statistical data on literacy in China before 1937 are lacking. Some authors remark that before 1800 probably all upper-class sons and most daughters were educated, and that men in the middle and even in the lower classes often had some degree of literacy. In this context “educated” means that these persons could read classical poetry and essays written in literary Chinese, which was not the language of daily conversation. “Literacy,” however, might mean only that a person could read and write some 600 characters, enough to conduct a business and to read simple stories. Although newspapers today have a stock of about 6,000 characters, only some 600 characters are commonly used, and a farmer or worker can manage well with a knowledge of about 100 characters. Statements to the effect that in 1935 some 70 per cent of all men and 95 per cent of all women were illiterate must include the last category in these figures. In any case, the literacy program of the Nationalist government had penetrated the countryside and had reached even outlying villages before the Pacific War.
      The transportation system in China before the war was not highly developed, but numerous railroads connecting the main industrial centers did exist, and bus and truck services connected small towns with the larger centers. What were missing in the pre-war years were laws to protect the investor, efficient credit facilities, an insurance system supported by law, and a modern tax structure. In addition, the monetary system was inflation-prone. Although sufficient capital probably could have been mobilized within the country, the available resources either went into foreign banks or were invested in enterprises providing a quick return.
      The failure to capitalize on existing means of development before the War resulted from the chronic unrest caused by warlordism, revolutionaries and foreign invaders, which occupied the energies of the Nationalist government from its establishment to its fall. Once a stable government free from internal troubles arose, national development, whether private or socialist, could proceed at a rapid pace.
      Thus, the development of Communist China is not a miracle, possible only because of its form of government. What is unusual about Communist China is the fact that it is the only nation possessing a highly developed culture of its own to have jettisoned it in favour of a foreign one. What missionaries had dreamed of for centuries and knew they would never accomplish, Mao Tse-tung achieved; he imposed an ideology created by Europeans and understandable only in the context of Central Europe in the nineteenth century. How long his success will last is uncertain. One school of analysts believes that the friction between Soviet Russia and Communist China indicates that China's communism has become Chinese. These men point out that Communist Chinese practices are often direct continuations of earlier Chinese practices, customs, and attitudes. And they predict that this trend will continue, resulting in a form of socialism or communism distinctly different from that found in any other country. Another school, however, believes that communism precedes “Sinism,” and that the regime will slowly eliminate traits which once were typical of China and replace them with institutions developed out of Marxist thinking. In any case, for the present, although the Communist government's aim is to impose communist thought and institutions in the country, typically Chinese traits are still omnipresent.
      Soon after the establishment of the Peking regime, a pact of friendship and alliance with the Soviet Union was concluded (February 1950), and Soviet specialists and civil and military products poured into China to speed its development. China had to pay for this assistance as well as for the loans it received from Russia, but the application of Russian experience, often involving the duplication of whole factories, was successful. In a few years, China developed its heavy industry, just as Russia had done. It should not be forgotten that Manchuria, as well as other parts of China, had modern heavy industries long before 1949. The Manchurian factories ceased production because, when the Russians invaded Manchuria at the end of the war, they removed the machinery to Russia.
      Russian aid to Communist China continued to 1960. Its termination slowed development briefly but was not disastrous. Russian assistance was a “shot in the arm,” as stimulating and about as lasting as American aid to Taiwan or to European countries. The stress laid upon heavy industry, in imitation of Russia, increased China's military strength quickly, but the consumer had to wait for goods which would make his life more enjoyable. One cause of friction in China today concerns the relative desirability of heavy industry versus consumer industry, a problem which arose in Russia after the death of Stalin.
      China's military strength was first demonstrated in the Korean War when Chinese armies entered Korea (October 1950). Their successes contributed to the prestige of the Peking regime at home and abroad, but they also foreshadowed a conflict with Soviet Russia, which regarded North Korea as lying within its own sphere of influence.
      In the same year, China invaded and conquered Tibet. Tibet, under Manchu rule until 1911, had achieved a certain degree of independence thereafter: no republican Chinese regime ever ruled Lhasa. The military conquest of Tibet is regarded by many as an act of Chinese imperialism, or colonialism, as the Tibetans certainly did not want to belong to China or be forced to change their traditional form of government. Having regarded themselves as subjects of the Manchu but not of the Chinese, they rose against the communist rulers in March 1959, but without success.
      Chinese control of Tibet, involving the construction of numerous roads, airstrips, and military installations, as well as differences concerning the international border, led in 1959 to conflicts with India, a country which had previously sided with the new China in international affairs. Indeed, the borders were uncertain and looked different depending on whether one used Manchu or Indian maps. China's other border problem was with Burma. Early in 1960 the two countries concluded a border agreement which ended disputes dating from British colonial times.
      Very early in its existence Communist China assumed control of Sinkiang, Chinese Central Asia, a large area originally inhabited by Turkish and Mongolian tribes and states, later conquered by the Manchu, and then integrated into China in the early nineteenth century. The communist action was to be expected, although after the Revolution of 1911 Chinese rule over this area had been spotty, and during the Pacific War some Soviet-inspired hope had existed that Sinkiang might gain independence, following the example of Outer Mongolia, another country which had been attached to the Manchu until 1911 and which, with Russian assistance, had gained its independence from China. Sinkiang is of great importance to Communist China as the site of large sources of oil and of atomic industries and testing grounds. The government has stimulated and often forced Chinese immigration into Sinkiang, so that the erstwhile Turkish and Mongolian majorities have become minorities, envious of their ethnic brothers in Soviet Central Asia who enjoy a much higher standard of living and more freedom.
      Inner Mongolia had a brief dream of independence under Japanese protection during the war. But the majority of the population were Chinese, and already before the Pacific War, the country had been divided into three Chinese provinces, of which the Chinese Communists gained control without delay.
      In general, when the Chinese Communists discuss territorial claims, they appear to seek the restoration of borders that China claimed in the eighteenth century. Thus, they make occasional remarks about the Hi area and parts of Eastern Siberia, which the Manchu either lost to the Russians or claimed as their territory. North Vietnam is probably aware that Imperial China exercised political rights over Tongking and Annam (the present-day North and part of South Vietnam). And, treaty or no, the Sino-Burmese question may be reopened one day, for Burma was semi-dependent on China under the Manchu.
      The build-up of heavy industry enabled China to conduct an aggressive policy towards the countries surrounding her, but industrialization had to be paid for, and, as in other countries, it was basically agriculture that had to create the necessary capital. Therefore, in June 1950 a land-reform law was promulgated. By October 1952 it had been implemented at an estimated cost of two million human lives: the landlords. The next step, socialization of the land, began in 1953.
      The co-operative farms were supposed to achieve higher production than small individual farms. It may be that any farmer, but particularly the Chinese, is emotionally involved in his crop, in contrast to the industrial worker, who often is alienated from the product he makes. Thus the farmer is unwilling to put unlimited energy and time into working on a farm that does not belong to him. But it may also be that the application of principles of industrial operation to agriculture fails because emergencies often occur in farming and are followed by periods of leisure, whereas in industry steady work is possible.
      In any case, in 1956 strains began to appear in China's economy. In early 1958 the “Great Leap Forward” was promoted in an attempt to speed production in all sectors. Soon after, the first communes were created, against the advise of Russian specialists. The objective of the communes seems to have been not only the creation of a new organizational form which would allow the government to exercise more pressure upon farmers to increase production, but also the correlation of labor and other needs of industry with agriculture. The communes may have represented an attempt to set up an organization which could function independently, even in the event of a governmental breakdown in wartime. At the same time, the decentralization of industries began and a people's militia was created. The “back-yard furnaces,” which produced high-cost iron of low quality, seem to have had a similar purpose: to teach citizens how to produce iron for armaments in case of war and enemy occupation, when only guerrilla resistance would be possible. In the same year, aggressive actions against offshore, Nationalist-held islands increased. China may have believed that war with the United States was imminent. Perhaps as a result of Russian talks with China, a detente followed in 1959, but so too did increased tension between Russia and China, while the results of the Great Leap and its policies proved catastrophic. The years 1961-64 provided a needed respite from the failures of the Great Leap. Farmers regained limited rights to income from private efforts, and improved farm techniques such as better seed and the use of fertilizer began to produce results. China can now feed her population in normal years.
      Chinese leaders realize that an improved level of living is difficult to attain while the birth rate remains high. They have hesitated to adopt a family-planning policy, which would fly in the face of Marxist doctrine, although for a short period family planning was openly recommended. Their most efficient method of limiting the birth rate has been to recommend postponement of marriage.
      First the limitation of private enterprise and business and then the nationalization of all important businesses following the completion of land reform deprived many employers as well as small shopkeepers of an occupation. But the new industries could not absorb all of the labor that suddenly became available. When rural youth inundated the cities in search of employment, the government returned the excess urban population to die countryside and recruited students and other urban youth to work on farms. Reeducation camps in outlying areas also provided cheap farm labor.
      The problem facing China or any nation that modernizes and industrializes in the twentieth century can be simply stated. Nineteenth-century industry needed large masses of workers which only the rural areas could supply; and, with the development of farming methods, the countryside could afford to send its youth to the cities. Twentieth-century industry, on the other hand, needs technicians and highly qualified personnel, often with college degrees, but few unskilled workers. China has traditionally employed human labor where machines would have been cheaper and more efficient, simply because labor was available and capital was not. But since, with the growth of modern industry and modern farming, the problem will arise again, the policy of employing urban youth on farms is shortsighted.
      The labor force also increased as a result of the “liberation” of women, in which the marriage law of April 1950 was the first step. Nationalist China had earlier created a modern and liberal marriage law; moreover, women were never the slaves that they have sometimes been painted. In many parts of China, long before the Pacific War, women worked in the fields with their husbands. Elsewhere they worked in secondary agricultural industries (weaving, preparation of food conserves, home industries, and even textile factories) and provided supplementary income for their families. All that “liberation” in 1950 really meant was that women had to work a full day as their husbands did, and had, in addition, to do house work and care for their children much as before. The new marriage law did, indeed, make both partners equal; it also made it easier for men to divorce their wives, political incompatibility becoming a ground for divorce.
      The ideological justification for a new marriage law was the desirability of destroying the traditional Chinese family and its economic basis because a close family, and all the more an extended family or a clan, could obviously serve as a center of resistance. Land collectivization and the nationalization of business destroyed the economic basis of families. The “liberation” of women brought them out of the house and made it possible for the government to exploit dissension between husband and wife, thereby increasing its control over the family. Finally, the new education system, which indoctrinated all children from nursery to the end of college, separated children from parents, thus undermining parental control and enabling the state to intimidate parents by encouraging their children to denounce their “deviations.” Sporadic efforts to dissolve the family completely by separating women from men in communes—recalling an attempt made almost a century earlier by the T'ai-p'ing—were unsuccessful.
      The best formula for a revolution seems to involve turning youth against its elders, rather than turning one class against another. Not all societies have a class system so clear-cut that class antagonism is effective. On the other hand, Chinese youth, in its opposition to the “establishment,” to conservatism, to traditional religion, to blind emulation of Western customs and institutions, to the traditional family structure and the position of women, had hopes that communism would eradicate the specific “evil” which each individual wanted abolished. Mao and his followers had once been such rebellious youths, but by the 1960's they were mostly old men and a new youth had appeared, a generation of revolutionaries for whom the “old regime” was dim history, not reality. In the struggle between Mao and Liu Shao-ch'i, which became increasingly apparent in 1966, Mao tried to retain his power by mobilizing young people as “Red Guards” and by inciting them to make the “Great Proletarian Revolution.” The motives behind the struggle are diverse. It is on the one hand a conflict of persons contending for power, but there are also disagreements over theory: for example, should China's present generation toil to make possible a better life only for the next generation, or should it enjoy the fruits of its labor, after its many years of suffering? Mao opposes such “weakening” and favours a new generation willing to endure hardships, as he did in his youth. There is also a question whether the Chinese Communist Party under the banner of Maoism should replace the Russian party, establish Mao as the fourth founder after Marx, Lenin, and Stalin, and become the leader of world communism, or whether it should collaborate with the Russian party, at least temporarily, and thus ensure China Russian support. When, however, Chinese youth was summoned to take up the fight for Mao and his group, forces were loosed which could not be controlled. Following independent action by youth groups similar in nature to youth revolts in Western countries, the power and prestige of older leaders suffered. Even now (1969) it is impossible to re-establish unity and order; the Mao and Liu groups still oppose each other, and local factions have arisen. Violent confrontations, often resulting in hundreds of deaths, occur in many provinces. The regime is no longer so strong and unified as it was before 1966, although its end is not in sight. Quite possibly far-reaching changes may occur in the future.
      Three factors will probably influence the future of China. First, the emergence of neo-communism, as in Czechoslovakia in 1968, in an attempt to soften traditional communist practice. Second, the outcome of the war in Vietnam. Will China be able to continue its eighteenth-century dream of direct or indirect domination of South-east Asia? Will North Vietnam detach itself from China and attach itself more closely to Russia? Will Russia and China continue to create separate spheres of influence in Asia, Africa, and South America? The first factor depends on developments inside China, the second on events outside, and at least in part on decisions in the United States, Japan, and Europe.
      The third factor has to do with human nature. One may justifiably ask whether the change in human personality which Chinese communism has attempted to achieve is possible, let alone desirable. Studies of animals and of human beings have demonstrated a tendency to identify with a territory, with property, and with kin. Can the Chinese eradicate this tendency? The Chinese have been family-centered and accustomed to subordinating their individual inclinations to the requirements of family and neighborhood. But beyond these established frameworks they have been individualistic and highly idiosyncratic at all times. Under the communist regime, however, the government is omnipresent, and people must toe the official line. One senses the tragedy that affects well-known scholars, writers and poets, who must degrade themselves, their work, their past and their families in order to survive. They may hope for comprehension of their actions, but nonetheless they must suffer shame. Will the present government change the minds of these men and eradicate their feelings?
      Communist China has made great progress, no doubt. Soon it may equal other developed nations. But its progress has been achieved at an unnecessary cost in human lives and happiness.
      That the regime is no longer so strong and unified as it was before 1966 does not mean that its end is in sight. Far-reaching changes may occur in the near future. Public opinion is impressed with mainland China's progress, as the world usually is with strong nations. And public opinion is still unimpressed by the achievements of Taiwan and has hardly begun to change its attitude toward the government of the “Republic of China.” To the historian and the sociologist, the experience of Taiwan indicates that China, if left alone and freed from ideological pressures, could industrialize more quickly than any other presently underdeveloped nation. Taiwan offers a model with which to compare mainland China.
     
      NOTES AND REFERENCES
      The following notes and references are intended to help the interested reader. They draw his attention to some more specialized literature in English, and occasionally in French and German. They also indicate for the more advanced reader the sources for some of the interpretations of historical events. As such sources are most often written in Chinese or Japanese and, therefore, inaccessible to most readers, only brief hints and not full bibliographical data are given. The specialists know the names and can easily find details in the standard bibliographies. The general reader will profit most from the bibliography on Chinese history published each year in the Journal of Asian Studies. These Notes do not mention the original Chinese sources which are the factual basis of this book.
      Chapter One
      p. 7: Reference is made here to the T'ung-chien kang-mu and its translation by de Mailla (1777-85). Criticism by O. Franke, Ku Chieh-kang and his school, also by G. Haloun.
      p. 8: For the chronology, I rely here upon Ijima Tadao and my own research. Excavations at Chou-k'ou-tien still continue and my account should be taken as very preliminary. An earlier analysis is given by E. von Eickstedt (Rassendynamik von Ostasien, Berlin 1944). For the following periods, the best general study is still J.G. Andersson, Researches into the Prehistory of the Chinese, Stockholm 1943. A great number of new findings has been made recently, but no comprehensive analysis in a Western language is available.
      p. 9: Comparison with Ainu has been made by Weidenreich. The theory of desiccation of Asia is not the Huntington theory, but I rely here upon arguments by J.G. Andersson and Sven Hedin.
      p. 10. The earlier theories of R. Heine-Geldern have been used here.
      p. 11: This is a summary of my own theories. Concerning the Tungus tribes, K. Jettmar (Wiener Beitraege zur Kulturgeschichte, vol. 9, 1952, p. 484f and later studies) has proposed a more refined theory; other parts of the theory, as far as it is concerned with conditions in Central Asia, have been modified by F. Kussmaul (in: Tribus, vol. 1952-3, pp. 305-60). Archaeological data from Central Asia have been analysed again by K. Jettmar (in: The Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, Bulletin No. 23, 1951). The discussion on domestication of large animals relies on the studies by C.O. Sauer, H. von Wissmann, Menghin, Amschler, Flohr and, most recently, F. Han[vc]ar (in: Saeculum, vol. 10, 1959, pp. 21-37 with further literature), and also on my own research.
      p. 12: An analysis of the situation in the South according to Western and Chinese studies is found in H.J. Wiens, China's March toward the Tropics, Hamden 1954. Much further work is now published by Ling Shun-sheng, Rui Yi-fu and other anthropologists in Taipei. The best analysis of denshiring in the Far East is still the book by K.J. Pelzer, Population and Land Utilization, New York 1941. The anthropological theories on this page are my own, influenced by ideas of R. Heine-Geldern and Gordon Luce.
      p. 14: Sociological theory, as developed by R. Thurnwald and others, has been used as a theoretical tool here, together with observations by A. Credner and H. Bernatzik. Concerning rice in Yang-shao see R. Heine-Geldern in Anthropos, vol. 27, p. 595.
      p. 15: Wu Chin-ting defended the local origin of Yang-shao; T.J. Arne, J.G. Andersson and many others suggested Western influences. Most recently R. Heine-Geldern elaborated this theory. The allusion to Indo-Europeans refers to the studies by G. Haloun and others concerning the Ta-Hsia, the later Yueeh-chih, and the Tocharian problem.
      p. 16: R. Heine-Geldern proposed a “Pontic migration”. Yin Huan-chang discussed most recently Lung-shan culture and the mound-dwellers.
      p. 17: The original Chu-shu chi-nien version of the stories about Yao has been accepted here, together with my own research and the studies by B. Karlgren, M. Loehr, G. Haloun, E.H. Minns and others concerning the origin and early distribution of bronze and the animal style. Smith families or tribes are well known from Central Asia, but also from India and Africa (see W. Ruben, Eisenschmiede und Daemonen in Indien, Leiden 1939, for general discussion).—For a discussion of the Hsia see E. Erkes.
      Chapter Two
      p. 19: The discussion in this chapter relies mainly upon the Anyang excavation reports and the studies by Tung Tso-pin and, most strongly, Ch'en Meng-chia. In English, the best work is still H.G. Creel, The Birth of China, London 1936 and his more specialized Studies in Early Chinese Culture, Baltimore 1937.
      p. 20: The possibility of a “megalithic” culture in the Far East has often been discussed, by O. Menghin, R. Heine-Geldern, Cheng Te-k'un, Ling Shun-sheng and others. Megaliths occur mainly in South-East Asia, southern China, Korea and Japan.—Teng Ch'u-min and others believe that silk existed already in the time of Yang-shao.
      p. 21: Kuo Mo-jo believes, that the Shang already used a real plough drawn by animals. The main discussion on ploughs in China is by Hsue Chung-shu; for general anthropological discussion see E. Werth and H. Kothe.
      p. 22: For the discussion of the T'ao-t'ieh see the research by B. Karlgren and C. Hentze.
      p. 23: I follow here mainly Ch'en Meng-chia, but work by B. Schindler, C. Hentze, H. Maspero and also my own research has been considered.
      p. 24: I am accepting here a narrow definition of feudalism (see my Conquerors and Rulers, Leiden 1952).—The division of armies into “right” and “left” is interesting in the light of the theories concerning the importance of systems of orientation (Fr. Rock and others).
      p. 25: Here, the work by W. Koppers, O. Spengler, F. Han[vc]ar, V.G. Childe and many others, concerning the domestication of the horse and the introduction of the war-chariot in general, and work by Shih Chang-ju, Ch'en Meng-chia, O. Maenchen, Uchida Gimpu and others concerning horses, riding and chariots in China has been used, in addition to my own research.
      p. 26: Concerning the wild animals, I have relied upon Ch'en Meng-chia, Hsue Chung-shu and Tung Tso-pin.—The discussion as to whether there was a period of “slave society” (as postulated by Marxist theory) in China, and when it flourished, is still going on under the leadership of Kuo Mo-jo and his group. I prefer to differentiate between slaves and serfs, and relied for factual data upon texts from oracle bones, not upon historical texts.—The problem of Shang chronology is still not solved, in spite of extensive work by Liu Ch'ao-yang, Tung Tso-pin and many Japanese and Western scholars. The old chronology, however, seems to be rejected by most scholars now.
      Chapter Three
      p. 29: Discussing the early script and language, I refer to the great number of unidentified Shang characters and, especially, to the composite characters which have been mentioned often by C. Hentze in his research; on the other hand, the original language of the Chou may have been different from classical Chinese, if we can judge from the form of the names of the earliest Chou ancestors. Problems of substrata languages enter at this stage. Our first understanding of Chou language and dialects seems to come through the method applied by P. Serruys, rather than through the more generally accepted theories and methods of B. Karlgren and his school.
      p. 30: I reject here the statement of classical texts that the last Shang ruler was unworthy, and accept the new interpretation of Ch'en Meng-chia which is based upon oracle bone texts,—The most recent general study on feudalism, and on feudalism in China, is in R. Coulborn, Feudalism in History, Princeton 1956. Stimulating, but in parts antiquated, is M. Granet, La Feodalite Chinoise, Oslo 1952. I rely here on my own research. The instalment procedure has been described by H. Maspero and Ch'i Sz[)u]-ho.
      p. 31: The interpretation of land-holding and clans follows my own research which is influenced by Niida Noboru, Kat[=o] Shigeru and other Japanese scholars, as well as by G. Haloun.—Concerning the origin of family names see preliminarily Yang Hsi-mei; much further research is still necessary. The general development of Chinese names is now studied by Wolfgang Bauer.—The spread of cities in this period has been studied by Li Chi, The Formation of the Chinese People, Cambridge 1928. My interpretation relies mainly upon a study of the distribution of non-Chinese tribes and data on early cities coming from excavation reports (see my “Data on the Structure of the Chinese City" in Economic Development and Cultural Change, 1956, pp. 253-68, and “The Formation of Chinese Civilization” in Sociologus 7, 1959, pp. 97-112).
      p. 32: The work on slaves by T. Pippon, E. Erkes, M. Wilbur, Wan Kuo-ting, Kuo Mo-jo, Niida Noboru, Kao Nien-chih and others has been consulted; the interpretation by E.G. Pulleyblank, however, was not accepted.
      p. 33: This interpretation of the “well-field” system relies in part upon the work done by Hsue Ti-shan, in part upon M. Granet and H. Maspero, and attempts to utilize insight from general anthropological theory and field-work mainly in South-East Asia. Other interpretations have been proposed by Yang Lien-sheng, Wan Kuo-ting, Ch'i Sz[)u]-ho P. Demieville, Hu Shih, Chi Ch'ao-ting, K.A. Wittfogel, and others Some authors, such as Kuo Mo-jo, regard the whole system as an utopia, but believe in an original “village community”.—The characterization of the Chou-li relies in part upon the work done by Hsue Chung-shu and Ku Chieh-kang on the titles of nobility, research by Yang K'uan and textual criticism by B. Karlgren, O. Franke, and again Ku Chieh-kang and his school.—The discussion on twin cities is intended to draw attention to its West Asian parallels, the “acropolis” or “ark” city, as well as to the theories on the difference between Western and Asian cities (M. Weber) and the specific type of cities in “dual societies" (H. Boeke).
      p. 34: This is a modified form of the Hu Shih theory.—The problem of nomadic agrarian inter-action and conflict has been studied for a later period mainly by O. Lattimore. Here, general anthropological research as well as my own have been applied.
      p. 36: The supra-stratification theory as developed by R. Thurnwald has been used as analytic tool here.
      p. 38: For this period, a novel interpretation is presented by R.L. Walker, The Multi-State System of China, Hamden 1953. For the concepts of sovereignty, I have used here the Chou-li text and interpretations based upon this text.
      p. 40: For the introduction of iron and the importance of Ch'i, see Chu Hsi-tsu, Kuo Mo-jo, Yang K'uan, Sekino, Takeshi.—Some scholars (G. Haloun) tend to interpret attacks such as the one of 660 B.C. as attacks from outside the borders of China.
      p. 41: For Confucius see H.G. Creel, Confucius, New York 1949. I do not, however, follow his interpretation, but rather the ideas of Hu Shih, O. Franke and others.
      p. 42: For “chuen-tz[)u]” and its counterpart “hsiao-jen” see D. Bodde and Ch'en Meng-chia.
      p 43: I rely strongly here upon O. Franke and Ku Chieh-kang and upon my own work on eclipses.
      p. 44: I regard the Confucian traditions concerning the model emperors of early time as such a falsification. The whole concept of “abdication” has been analysed by M. Granet. The later ceremony of abdication was developed upon the basis of the interpretations of Confucius and has been studied by Ku Chieh-kang and Miyakawa Hisayuki. Already Confucius' disciple Meng Tz[)u], and later Chuang Tz[)u] and Han Fei Tz[)u] were against this theory.—As a general introduction to the philosophy of this period, Y.L. Feng's History of Chinese Philosophy, London 1937 has still to be recommended, although further research has made many advances.—My analysis of the role of Confucianism in society is influenced by theories in the field of Sociology of religion.
      p. 45: The temple in Turkestan was in Khotan and is already mentioned in the Wei-shu chapter 102. The analysis of the famous “Book on the transfiguration of Lao Tz[)u] into a Western Barbarian” by Wang Wei-cheng is penetrating and has been used here. The evaluation of Lao Tz[)u] and his pupils as against Confucius by J. Needham, in his Science and Civilization in China, Cambridge 1954 et seq. (in volume 2) is very stimulating, though necessarily limited to some aspects only.
      p. 47: The concept of wu-wei has often been discussed; some, such as Masaaki Matsumoto, interpreted the concept purely in social terms as “refusal of actions carrying worldly estimation”.
      p. 49 Further literature concerning alchemy and breathing exercises is found in J. Needham's book.
      Chapter Four
      p. 51: I have used here the general framework of R.L. Walker, but more upon Yang K'uan's studies.
      p. 52: The interpretation of the change of myths in this period is based in part upon the work done by H. Maspero, G. Haloun, and Ku Chieh-kang. The analysis of legends made by B. Karlgren from a philological point of view (“Legends and Cults in Ancient China", The Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities, Bulletin No. 18, 1946, pp. 199-365) follows another direction.
      p. 53: The discussion on riding involves the theories concerning horse-nomadic tribes and the period of this way of life. It also involves the problem of the invention of stirrup and saddle. The saddle seems to have been used in China already at the beginning of our period; the stirrup seems to be as late as the fifth century A.D. The article by A. Kroeber, The Ancient Oikumene as an Historic Culture Aggregate, Huxley Memorial Lecture for 1945, is very instructive for our problems and also for its theoretical approach.—The custom of attracting settlers from other areas in order to have more production as well as more manpower seems to have been known in India at the same time.
      p. 54: The work done by Kat[=o] Shigeru and Niida Noboru on property and family has been used here. For the later period, work done by Makino Tatsumi has also been incorporated.—Literature on the plough and on iron for implements has been mentioned above. Concerning the fallow system, I have incorporated the ideas of Kat[=o] Shigeru, [=O]shima Toshikaza, Hsue Ti-shan and Wan Kuo-ting. Hsue Ti-shan believes that a kind of 3-field system had developed by this time. Traces of such a system have been observed in modern China (H.D. Scholz). For these questions, the translation by N. Lee Swann, Food and Money in Ancient China, 1959 is very important.
      p. 55: For all questions of money and credit from this period down to modern times, the best brief introduction is by Lien-sheng Yang, Money and Credit in China, Cambridge 1952. The Introduction to the Economic History of China, London 1954, by E. Stuart Kirby is certainly still the best brief introduction into all problems of Chinese Economic history and contains a bibliography in Western and Chinese-Japanese languages. Articles by Chinese authors on economic problems have been translated in E-tu Zen Sun and J. de Francis, Chinese Social History, Washington 1956.—Data on the size of early cities have been collected by T. Sekino and Kat[=o] Shigeru.
      p. 56: T. Sekino studied the forms of cities. C. Hentze believes that the city even in the Shang period normally had a square plan.—T. Sekino has also made the first research on city coins. Such a privilege and such independence of cities disappear later, but occasionally the privilege of minting was given to persons of high rank.—K.A. Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism, New Haven 1957 regards irrigation as a key economic and social factor and has built up his theory around this concept. I do not accept his theory here or later. Evidence seems to point towards the importance of transportation systems rather than of government-sponsored or operated irrigation systems.—Concerning steel, we follow Yang K'uan; a special study by J. Needham is under preparation. Centre of steel production at this time was Wan (later Nanyang in Honan).—For early Chinese law, the study by A.F.P. Hulsewe, Remnants of Han Law, Leiden 1955 is the best work in English. He does not, however, regard Li K'ui as the main creator of Chinese law, though Kuo Mo-jo and others do. It is obvious, however, that Han law was not a creation of the Han Chinese alone and that some type of code must have existed before Han, even if such a code was not written by the man Li K'ui. A special study on Li was made by O. Franke.
      p. 57: In the description of border conditions, research by O. Lattimore has been taken into consideration.
      p. 59: For Shang Yang and this whole period, the classical work in English is still J.J.L. Duyvendak, The Book of Lord Shang, London 1928; the translation by Ma Perleberg of The Works of Kung-sun Lung-tzu, Hongkong 1952 as well as the translation of the Economic Dialogues in Ancient China: The Kuan-tzu, edited by L. Maverick, New Haven 1954 have not found general approval, but may serve as introductions to the way philosophers of our period worked. Han Fei Tz[)u]; has been translated by W.K. Liao, The Complete Works of Han Fei Tz[)u], London 1939 (only part 1).
      p. 60: Needham does not have such a positive attitude towards Tsou Yen, and regards Western influences upon Tsou Yen as not too likely. The discussion on pp. 60-1 follows mainly my own researches.
      p. 61: The interpretation of secret societies is influenced by general sociological theory and detailed reports on later secret societies. S. Murayama and most modern Chinese scholars stress almost solely the social element in the so-called “peasant rebellions”.
      Chapter Five
      p. 63: The analysis of the emergence of Ch'in bureaucracy has profited from general sociological theory, especially M. Weber (see the new analysis by R. Bendix, Max Weber, an Intellectual Portrait, Garden City 1960, p. 117-157). Early administration systems of this type in China have been studied in several articles in the journal Yue-kung (vol. 6 and 7).
      p. 65: In the discussion of language, I use arguments which have been brought forth by P. Serruys against the previously generally accepted theories of B. Karlgren.—For weights and measures I have referred to T. Sekino, Liu Fu and Wu Ch'eng-lo.
      p. 66: For this period, D. Bodde's China's First Unifier, Leiden 1938 and his Statesman, Patriot, and General in Ancient China, New Haven 1940 remain valuable studies.
      Chapter Six
      p. 71: The basic historical text for this whole period, the Dynastic History of the Han Dynasty, is now in part available in English translation (H.H. Dubs, The History of the Former Han Dynasty, Baltimore 1938, 3 volumes).
      p. 72: The description of the gentry is based upon my own research. Other scholars define the word “gentry", if applied to China, differently (some of the relevant studies are discussed in my note in the Bull. School of Orient. &African Studies, 1955, p. 373 f.).
      p. 73: The theory of the cycle of mobility has been brought forth by Fr. L.K. Hsu and others. I have based my criticism upon a forthcoming study of Social Mobility in Traditional Chinese Society. The basic point is not the momentary economic or political power of such a family, but the social status of the family (Li-shih yen-chiu, Peking 1955, No. 4, p. 122). The social status was, increasingly, defined and fixed by law (Ch'ue T'ung-tsu).—The difference in the size of gentry and other families has been pointed out by a number of scholars such as Fr. L.K. Hsu, H.T. Fei, O. Lang. My own research seems to indicate that gentry families, on the average, married earlier than other families.
      p. 74: The Han system of examinations or rather of selection has been studied by Yang Lien-sheng; and analysis of the social origin of candidates has been made in the Bull. Chinese Studies, vol. 2, 1941, and 3, 1942.—The meaning of the term “Hundred Families” has been discussed by W. Eichhorn, Kuo Mo-jo, Ch'en Meng-chia and especially by Hsue T'ung-hsin. It was later also a fiscal term.
      p. 75: The analysis of Hsiung-nu society is based mainly upon my own research. There is no satisfactory history of these northern federations available in English. The compilation of W.M. MacGovern, The Early Empires of Central Asia, Chapel Hill 1939, is now quite antiquated.—An attempt to construct a model of Central Asian nomadic social structure has been made by E.E. Bacon, Obok, a Study of Social Structure in Eurasia, New York 1958, but the model constructed by B. Vladimirtsov and modified by O. Lattimore remains valuable.—For origin and early-development of Hsiung-nu society see O. Maenchen, K. Jettmar, B. Bernstam, Uchida Gimpu and many others.
      p. 79: Material on the “classes” (sz[)u] min) will be found in a forthcoming book. Studies by Ch'ue T'ung-tsu and Tamai Korehiro are important here. An up-to-date history of Chinese education is still a desideratum.
      p. 80: For Tung Chung-shu, I rely mainly upon O. Franke.—Some scholars do not accept this “double standard", although we have clear texts which show that cases were evaluated on the basis of Confucian texts and not on the basis of laws. In fact, local judges probably only in exceptional cases knew the text of the law or had the code. They judged on the basis of “customary law”.
      p. 81: Based mainly upon my own research. K.A. Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism, New Haven 1957, has a different interpretation.
      p. 82: Cases in which the Han emperors disregarded the law code were studied by Y. Hisamura.—I have used here studies published in the Bull, of Chinese Studies, vol. 2 and 3 and in Toyo gakuho, vol. 8 and 9, in addition to my own research.
      p. 85: On local administration see Kat[=o] Shigeru and Yen Keng-wang's studies.
      p. 86: The problem of the Chinese gold, which will be touched upon later again, has gained theoretical interest, because it could be used as a test of M. Lombard's theories concerning the importance of gold in the West (Annales, Economies, Societes, Civilisations, vol. 12, Paris 1957, No. 1, p. 7-28). It was used in China from c. 600 B.C. on in form of coins or bars, but disappeared almost completely from A.D. 200 on, i.e. the period of economic decline (see L.S. Yang, Kat[=o] Shigeru).—The payment to border tribes occurs many times again in Chinese history down to recent times; it has its parallel in British payments to tribes in the North-West Frontier Province in India which continued even after the Independence.
      p. 88: According to later sources, one third of the tributary gifts was used in the Imperial ancestor temples, one third in the Imperial mausolea, but one third was used as gifts to guests of the Emperor.—The trade aspect of the tributes was first pointed but by E. Parker, later by O. Lattimore, recently by J.K. Fairbank.—The importance of Chang Ch'ien for East-West contacts was systematically studied by B. Laufer; his Sino-Iranica, Chicago 1919 is still a classic.
      p. 89: The most important trait which points to foreign trade, is the occurrence of glass in Chinese tombs in Indo-China and of glass in China proper from the fifth century B.C. on; it is assumed that this glass was imported from the Near East, possibly from Egypt (O. Janse, N. Egami, Seligman).
      p. 91: Large parts of the “Discussions” have been translated by Esson M. Gale, Discourses on Salt and Iron, Leiden 1931; the continuation of this translation is in Jour. Royal As. Society, North-China Branch 1934.—The history of eunuchs in China remains to be written. They were known since at least the seventh century B.C. The hypothesis has been made that this custom had its origin in Asia Minor and spread from there (R.F. Spencer in Ciba Symposia, vol. 8, No. 7, 1946 with references).
      p. 92: The main source on Wang Mang is translated by C.B. Sargent, Wang Mang, a translation, Shanghai 1950 and H.H. Dubs, History of the Former Han Dynasty, vol, 3, Baltimore 1955.
      p. 93: This evaluation of the “Old character school” is not generally accepted. A quite different view is represented by Tjan Tjoe Som and R.P. Kramers and others who regard the differences between the schools as of a philological and not a political kind. I follow here most strongly the Chinese school as represented by Ku Chieh-kang and his friends, and my own studies.
      p. 93: Falsification of texts refers to changes in the Tso-chuan. My interpretation relies again upon Ku Chieh-kang, and Japanese astronomical studies (Ijima Tadao), but others, too, admit falsifications (H.H. Dubs); B. Karlgren and others regard the book as in its main body genuine. The other text mentioned here is the Chou-li which is certainly not written by Wang Mang (Jung-chai Hsue-pi 16), but heavily mis-used by him (in general see S. Uno).
      p. 94: I am influenced here by some of H.H. Dubs's studies. For this and the following period, the work by H. Bielenstein, The Restoration of the Han Dynasty, Stockholm 1953 and 1959 is the best monograph.—The “equalization offices” and their influence upon modern United States has been studied by B. Bodde in the Far Eastern Quarterly, vol. 5, 1946.
      p. 95: H. Bielenstein regards a great flood as one of the main reasons for the breakdown of Wang Mang's rule.
      p. 98: For the understanding of Chinese military colonies in Central Asia as well as for the understanding of military organization, civil administration and business, the studies of Lao Kan on texts excavated in Central Asia and Kansu are of greatest importance.
      p. 101: Mazdaistic elements in this rebellion have been mentioned mainly by H.H. Dubs. Zoroastrism (Zoroaster born 569 B.C.) and Mazdaism were eminently “political” religions from their very beginning on. Most scholars admit the presence of Mazdaism in China only from 519 on (Ishida Mikinosuke, O. Franke). Dubs's theory can be strengthened by astronomical material.—The basic religious text of this group, the “Book of the Great Peace” has been studied by W. Eichhorn Maspero and Ho Ch'ang-ch'uen.
      p. 102: For the “church” I rely mainly upon H. Maspero and W. Eichhorn.
      p. 103: I use here concepts developed by Cheng Chen-to and especially by Jung Chao-tsu.
      p. 104: Wang Ch'ung's importance has recently been mentioned again by J. Needham.
      p. 105: These “court poets” have their direct parallel in Western Asia. This trend, however, did not become typical in China.—On the general history of paper read A. Kroeber, Anthropology, New York 1948, p. 490f., and Dard Hunter, Paper Making, New York 1947 (2nd ed.).
      Chapter Seven
      p. 109: The main historical sources for this period have been translated by Achilles Fang, The Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms, Cambridge, Mass. 1952; the epic which describes this time is C.H. Brewitt-Taylor, San Kuo, or Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Shanghai 1925.
      p. 112: For problems of migration and settlement in the South, we relied in part upon research by Ch'en Yuean and Wang Yi-t'ung.
      p. 114: For the history of the Hsiung-nu I am relying mainly upon my own studies.
      p. 117: This analysis of tribal structure is based mainly upon my own research; it differs in detail from the studies by E. Bacon, Obok, a Study of Social Structure in Eurasia, New York 1958, B. Vladimirtsov, O. Lattimore's Inner Asian Frontiers of China, New York 1951 (2nd edit.) and the studies by L.M.J. Schram, The Monguors of the Kansu-Tibetan Frontier, Philadelphia 1954 and 1957.
      p. 118: The use of the word “Huns” does not imply that we identify the early or the late Hsiung-nu with the European Huns. This question is still very much under discussion (O. Maenchen, W. Haussig, W. Henning, and others).
      p. 119: For the history of the early Hsien-pi states see the monograph by G. Schreiber, “The History of the Former Yen Dynasty", in Monomenta Serica, vol. 14 and 15 (1949-56). For all translations from Chinese Dynastic Histories of the period between 220 and 960 the Catalogue of Translations from the Chinese Dynastic Histories for the Period 220-960, by Hans H. Frankel, Berkeley 1957, is a reliable guide.
      p. 125: For the description of conditions in Turkestan, especially in Tunhuang, I rely upon my own studies, but studies by A. von Gabein, L. Ligeti, J.R. Ware, O. Franke and Tsukamoto Zenryu have been used, too.
      p. 133: These songs have first been studied by Hu Shih, later by Chinese folklorists.
      p. 134: For problems of Chinese Buddhism see Arthur F. Wright, Buddhism in Chinese History, Stanford 1959, with further bibliography. I have used for this and later periods, in addition to my own sociological studies, R. Michihata, J. Gernet, and Tamai Korehiro.—It is interesting that the rise of landowning temples in India occurred at exactly the same time (R.S. Sharma in Journ. Econ. and Soc. Hist. Orient, vol. 1, 1958, p. 316). Perhaps even more interesting, but still unstudied, is the existence of Buddhist temples in India which owned land and villages which were donated by contributions from China.—For the use of foreign monks in Chinese bureaucracies, I have used M. Weber's theory as an interpretative tool.
      p. 135: The important deities of Khotan Buddhism are Vai['s]ramana and Kubera, (research by P. Demieville, R. Stein and others).—Where, how, and why Hinayana and Mahayana developed as separate sects, is not yet studied. Also, a sociological analysis of the different Buddhist sects in China has not even been attempted yet.
      p. 136: Such public religious disputations were known also in India.
      p. 137: Analysis of the tribal names has been made by L. Bazin.
      pp. 138-9: The personality type which was the ideal of the Toba corresponded closely to the type described by G. Geesemann, Heroische Lebensform, Berlin 1943.
      p. 142: The Toba occur in contemporary Western sources as Tabar, Tabgac, Tafkac and similar names. The ethnic name also occurs as a title (O. Pritsak, P. Pelliot, W. Haussig and others).—On the chuen-t'ien system cf. the article by Wan Kuo-ting in E-tu Zen Sun, Chinese Social History, Washington 1956, p. 157-184. I also used Yoshimi Matsumoto and T'ang Ch'ang-ju.—Census fragments from Tunhuang have been published by L. Giles, Niida Noboru and other Japanese scholars.
      p. 143: On slaves for the earlier time see M. Wilbur, Slavery in China during the Former Han Dynasty, Chicago 1943. For our period Wang Yi-t'ung and especially Niida Noboru and Ch'ue T'ung-tsu. I used for this discussion Niida, Ch'ue and Tamai Korehiro.—For the pu-ch'ue I used in addition Yang Chung-i, H. Maspero, E. Balazs, W. Eichhorn. Yang's article is translated in E-tu Zen Sun's book, Chinese Social History, pp. 142-56.—The question of slaves and their importance in Chinese society has always been given much attention by Chinese Communist authors. I believe that a clear distinction between slaves and serfs is very important.
      p. 145: The political use of Buddhism has been asserted for Japan as well as for Korea and Tibet (H. Hoffmann, Quellen zur Geschichte der tibetischen Bon-Religion, Mainz 1950, p. 220 f.). A case could be made for Burma. In China, Buddhism was later again used as a tool by rulers (see below).
      p. 146: The first text in which such problems of state versus church are mentioned is Mou Tz[)u] (P. Pelliot transl.). More recently, some of the problems have been studied by R. Michihata and E. Zuercher. Michihata also studied the temple slaves. Temple families were slightly different. They have been studied mainly by R. Michihata, J. Gernet and Wang Yi-t'ung. The information on T'an-yao is mainly in Wei-shu 114 (transl. J. Ware).—The best work on Yuen-kang is now Seiichi Mizuno and Toshio Nagahiro, Yuen-kang. The Buddhist Cave-Temples of the Fifth Century A.D. in North China, Kyoto 1951-6, thus far 16 volumes. For Chinese Buddhist art, the work by Tokiwa Daijo and Sekino Tadashi, Chinese Buddhist Monuments, Tokyo 1926-38, 5 volumes, is most profusely illustrated.—As a general reader for the whole of Chinese art, Alexander Soper and L. Sickman's The Art and Architecture of China, Baltimore 1956 may be consulted.
      p, 147: Zenryu Tsukamoto has analysed one such popular, revolutionary Buddhist text from the fifth century A.D. I rely here for the whole chapter mainly upon my own research.
      p. 150: On the Ephtalites (or Hephtalites) see R. Ghirshman and Enoki.—The carpet ceremony has been studied by P. Boodberg, and in a comparative way by L. Olschki, The Myth of Felt, Berkeley 1949.
      p. 151: For Yang Chien and his time see now A.F. Wright, “The Formation of Sui Ideology” in John K. Fairbank, Chinese Thought and Institutions, Chicago 1957, pp. 71-104.
      p. 153: The processes described here, have not yet been thoroughly analysed. A preliminary review of literature is given by H. Wiens, China's March towards the Tropics, Hamden 1954. I used Ch'en Yuean, Wang Yi-t'ung and my own research.
      p. 154: It is interesting to compare such hunting parks with the “ paradeisos” (Paradise) of the Near East and with the “Garden of Eden”.—Most of the data on gardens and manors have been brought together and studied by Japanese scholars, especially by Kat[=o] Shigeru, some also by Ho Tzu-ch'uean.—The disappearance of “village commons” in China should be compared with the same process in Europe; both processes, however, developed quite differently. The origin of manors and their importance for the social structure of the Far East (China as well as Japan) is the subject of many studies in Japan and in modern China. This problem is connected with the general problem of feudalism East and West. The manor (chuang: Japanese sho) in later periods has been studied by Y. Sudo. H. Maspero also devotes attention to this problem. Much more research remains to be done.
      p. 158: This popular rebellion by Sun En has been studied by W. Eichhorn.
      p. 163: On foreign music in China see L.C. Goodrich and Ch'ue T'ung-tsu, H.G. Farmer, S. Kishibe and others.—Niida Noboru pointed out that musicians belonged to one of the lower social classes, but had special privileges because of their close relations to the rulers.
      p. 164: Meditative or Ch'an (Japanese: Zen) Buddhism in this period has been studied by Hu Shih, but further analysis is necessary.—The philosophical trends of this period have been analysed by E. Balazs.—Mention should also be made of the aesthetic-philosophical conversation which was fashionable in the third century, but in other form still occurred in our period, the so-called “pure talk” (ch'ing-t'an) (E. Balazs, H. Wilhelm and others).
      Chapter Eight
      p. 167: For genealogies and rules of giving names, I use my own research and the study by W. Bauer.
      p. 168: For Emperor Wen Ti, I rely mainly upon A.F. Wright's above-mentioned article, but also upon O. Franke.
      p. 169: The relevant texts concerning the T'u-chueeh are available in French (E. Chavannes) and recently also in German translation (Liu Mau-tsai, Die chinesischen Nachrichten zur Geschichte der Ost-T[vu]rken, Wiesbaden 1958, 2 vol.).—The Toeloes are called T'e-lo in Chinese sources; the T'u-yue-hun are called Aza in Central Asian sources (P. Pelliot, A. Minorsky, F.W. Thomas, L. Hambis, et al.). The most important text concerning the T'u-yue-hun had been translated by Th. D. Caroll, Account of the T'u-yue-hun in the History of the Chin Dynasty, Berkeley 1953.
      p. 171: The transcription of names on this and on the other maps could not be adjusted to the transcription of the text for technical reasons.
      p. 172: It is possible that I have underestimated the role of Li Yuean. I relied here mainly upon O. Franke and upon W. Bingham's The Founding of the T'ang Dynasty, Baltimore 1941.
      p. 173: The best comprehensive study of T'ang economy in a Western language is still E. Balazs's work. I relied, however, strongly upon Wan Kuo-ting, Yang Chung-i, Kat[=o] Shigeru, J. Gernet, T. Naba, Niida Noboru, Yoshimi Matsumoto.
      pp. 173-4: For the description of the administration I used my own studies and the work of R. des Rotours; for the military organization I used Kikuchi Hideo. A real study of Chinese army organization and strategy does not yet exist. The best detailed study, but for the Han period, is written by H. Maspero.
      p. 174: For the first occurrence of the title tu-tu we used W. Eichhorn; in the form tutuq the title occurs since 646 in Central Asia (J. Hamilton).
      p. 177: The name T'u-fan seems to be a transcription of Tuepoet which, in turn, became our Tibet. (J. Hamilton).—The Uighurs are the Hui-ho or Hui-hu of Chinese sources.
      p. 179: On relations with Central Asia and the West see Ho Chien-min and Hsiang Ta, whose classical studies on Ch'ang-an city life have recently been strongly criticized by Chinese scholars.—Some authors (J.K. Rideout) point to the growing influence of eunuchs in this period.—The sources paint the pictures of the Empress Wu in very dark colours. A more detailed study of this period seems to be necessary.
      p. 180: The best study of “family privileges” (yin) in general is by E.A. Kracke, Civil Service in Early Sung China, Cambridge, Mass. 1953.
      p. 180-1: The economic importance of organized Buddhism has been studied by many authors, especially J. Gernet, Yang Lien-sheng, Ch'uean Han-sheng, K. Tamai and R. Michihata.
      p. 182: The best comprehensive study on T'ang prose in English is still E.D. Edwards, Chinese Prose Literature of the T'ang Period, London 1937-8, 2 vol. On Li T'ai-po and Po Chue-i we have well-written books by A. Waley, The Poetry and Career of Li Po, London 1951 and The Life and Times of Po Chue-i, London 1950.—On the “free poem” (tz[)u]), which technically is not a free poem, see A. Hoffmann and Hu Shih. For the early Chinese theatre, the classical study is still Wang Kuo-wei's analysis, but there is an almost unbelievable number of studies constantly written in China and Japan, especially on the later theatre and drama.
      p. 184: Conditions at the court of Hsuean Tsung and the life of Yang Kui-fei have been studied by Howard Levy and others, An Lu-shan's importance mainly by E.G. Pulleyblank, The Background of the Rebellion of An Lu-shan, London 1955.
      p. 187: The tax reform of Yang Yen has been studied by K. Hino; the most important figures in T'ang economic history are Liu Yen (studied by Chue Ch'ing-yuean) and Lu Chih (754-805; studied by E. Balazs and others).
      pp. 187-8: The conditions at the time of this persecution are well described by E.O. Reischauer, Ennin's Travels in T'ang China, New York 1955, on the basis of his Ennin's Diary. The Record of a Pilgrimage to China, New York 1955. The persecution of Buddhism has been analysed in its economic character by Niida Noboru and other Japanese scholars.—Metal statues had to be delivered to the Salt and Iron Office in order to be converted into cash; iron statues were collected by local offices for the production of agricultural implements; figures in gold, silver or other rare materials were to be handed over to the Finance Office. Figures made of stone, clay or wood were not affected (Michihata).
      p. 189: It seems important to note that popular movements are often not led by simple farmers of members of the lower classes. There are other salt merchants and persons of similar status known as leaders.
      p. 190: For the Sha-t'o, I am relying upon my own research. Tatars are the Ta-tan of the Chinese sources. The term is here used in a narrow sense.
      Chapter Nine
      p. 195: Many Chinese and Japanese authors have a new period begin with the early (Ch'ien Mu) or the late tenth century (T'ao Hsi-sheng, Li Chien-nung), while others prefer a cut already in the Middle of the T'ang Dynasty (Teng Ch'u-min, Naito Torajiro). For many Marxists, the period which we called “Modern Times” is at best a sub-period within a larger period which really started with what we called “Medieval China”.
      p. 196: For the change in the composition of the gentry, I am using my own research.—For clan rules, clan foundations, etc., I used D.C. Twitchett, J. Fischer, Hu Hsien-chin, Ch'ue T'ung-tsu, Niida Noboru and T. Makino. The best analysis of the clan rules is by Wang Hui-chen in D.S. Nivison, Confucianism in Action, Stanford 1959, p. 63-96.—I do not regard such marriage systems as “survivals” of ancient systems which have been studied by M. Granet and systematically analysed by C. Levy-Strauss in his Les structures elementaires de la parente, Paris 1949, pp. 381-443. In some cases, the reasons for the establishment of such rules can still be recognized.—A detailed study of despotism in China still has to be written. K.A. Wittfogel's Oriental Despotism, New Haven 1957 does not go into the necessary detailed work.
      p. 197: The problem of social mobility is now under study, after preliminary research by K.A. Wittfogel, E. Kracke, myself and others. E. Kracke, Ho Ping-ti, R.M. Marsh and I are now working on this topic.—For the craftsmen and artisans, much material has recently been collected by Chinese scholars. I have used mainly Li Chien-nung and articles in Li-shih yen-chiu 1955, No. 3 and in Mem. Inst. Orient. Cult. 1956.—On the origin of guilds see Kat[=o] Shigeru; a general study of guilds and their function has not yet been made (preliminary work by P. Maybon, H.B. Morse, J. St. Burgess, K.A. Wittfogel and others). Comparisons with Near-Eastern guilds on the one hand and with Japanese guilds on the other, are quite interesting but parallels should not be over-estimated. The tong of U.S. Chinatowns (tang in Mandarin) are late and organizations of businessmen only (S. Yokoyama and Laai Yi-faai). They are not the same as the hui-kuan.
      p. 198: For the merchants I used Ch'ue T'ung-tsu, Sung Hsi and Wada Kiyoshi.—For trade, I used extensively Ch'uean Han-sheng and J. Kuwabara.—On labour legislation in early modern times I used Ko Ch'ang-chi and especially Li Chien-nung, also my own studies.—On strikes I used Kat[=o] Shigeru and modern Chinese authors.—The problem of “vagrants” has been taken up by Li Chien-nung who always refers to the original sources and to modern Chinese research.—The growth of cities, perhaps the most striking event in this period, has been studied for the earlier part of our period by Kat[=o] Shigeru. Li Chien-nung also deals extensively with investments in industry and agriculture. The problem as to whether China would have developed into an industrial society without outside stimulus is much discussed by Marxist authors in China.
      p. 199: On money policy see Yang Lien-sheng, Kat[=o] Shigeru and others.
      p. 200: The history of one of the Southern Dynasties has been translated by Ed. H. Schafer, The Empire of Min, Tokyo 1954; Schafer's annotations provide much detail for the cultural and economic conditions of the coastal area.—For tea and its history, I use my own research; for tea trade a study by K. Kawakami and an article in the Frontier Studies, vol. 3, 1943.—Salt consumption according to H.T. Fei, Earthbound China, 1945, p. 163.
      p. 201: For salt I used largely my own research. For porcelain production Li Chien-nung and other modern articles.—On paper, the classical study is Th. F. Carter, The Invention of Printing in China, New York 1925 (a revised edition now published by L.C. Goodrich).
      p. 202: For paper money in the early period, see Yang Lien-sheng, Money and Credit in China, Cambridge, Mass., 1952. Although the origin of paper money seems to be well established, it is interesting to note that already in the third century A.D. money made of paper was produced and was burned during funeral ceremonies to serve as financial help for the dead. This money was, however, in the form of coins.—On iron money see Yang Lien-sheng; I also used an article in Tung-fang tsa-chih, vol. 35, No. 10.
      p. 203: For the Kitan (Chines: Ch'i-tan) and their history see K.A. Wittfogel and Feng Chia-sheng, History of Chinese Society. Liao, Philadelphia 1949.
      p. 204: For these dynasties, I rely upon my own research.—Niida Noboru and Kat[=o] Shigeru have studied adoption laws; our specific case has in addition been studied by M. Kurihara. This system of adoptions is non-Chinese and has its parallels among Turkish tribes (A. Kollantz, Abdulkadir Inan, Osman Turan).
      p. 207: For the persecution I used K. Tamai and my own research.
      p. 211: This is based mainly upon my own research.—The remark on tax income is from Ch'uean Han-sheng.
      p. 212: Fan Chung-yen has been studied recently by J. Fischer and D. Twitchett, but these notes on price policies are based upon my own work.—I regard the statement, that it was the gentry which prevented the growth of an industrial society—a statement which has often been made before—as preliminary, and believe that further research, especially in the growth of cities and urban institutions may lead to quite different explanations.—On estate management I relied on Y. Sudo's work.
      p. 213: Research on place names such as mentioned here, has not yet been systematically done.—On i-chuang I relied upon the work by T. Makino and D. Twitchett.—This process of tax-evasion has been used by K.A. Wittfogel (1938) to construct a theory of a crisis cycle in China. I do not think that such far-reaching conclusions are warranted.
      p. 214: This “law” was developed on the basis of Chinese materials from different periods as well as on materials from other parts of Asia.—In the study of tenancy, cases should be studied in which wealthier farmers rent additional land which gets cultivated by farm labourers. Such cases are well known from recent periods, but have not yet been studied in earlier periods. At the same time, the problem of farm labourers should be investigated. Such people were common in the Sung time. Research along these lines could further clarify the importance of the so-called “guest families” (k'o-hu) which were alluded to in these pages. They constituted often one third of the total population in the Sung period. The problem of migration and mobility might also be clarified by studying the k'o-hu.
      p. 215: For Wang An-shih, the most comprehensive work is still H. Williamson's Wang An-shih, London 1935, 3 vol., but this work in no way exhausts the problems. We have so much personal data on Wang that a psychological study could be attempted; and we have since Williamson's time much deeper insight into the reforms and theories of Wang. I used, in addition to Williamson, O. Franke, and my own research.
      p. 216: Based mainly upon Ch'ue T'ung-tsu.—For the social legislation see Hsue I-t'ang; for economic problems I used Ch'uean Han-sheng, Ts'en Chung-mien and Liu Ming-shu.—Most of these relief measures had their precursors in the T'ang period.
      p. 217: It is interesting to note that later Buddhism gave up its “social gospel” in China. Buddhist circles in Asian countries at the present time attempt to revive this attitude.
      p. 218: For slaughtering I used A. Hulsewe; for greeting R. Michihata; on law Ch'ue T'ung-tsu; on philosophy I adapted ideas from Chan Wing-sit.
      p. 219: A comprehensive study of Chu Hsi is a great desideratum. Thus far, we have in English mainly the essays by Feng Yu-lan (transl. and annotated by D. Bodde) in the Harvard Journal of Asiat. Stud., vol. 7, 1942. T. Makino emphasized Chu's influence upon the Far East, J. Needham his interest in science.
      p. 220: For Su Tung-p'o as general introduction see Lin Yutang, The Gay Genius. The Life and Times of Su Tung-p'o, New York 1947.—For painting, I am using concepts of A. Soper here.
      p. 222: For this period the standard work is K.A. Wittfogel and Feng Chia-sheng, History of Chinese Society, Liao, Philadelphia 1949.—Po-hai had been in tributary relations with the dynasties of North China before its defeat, and resumed these from 932 on; there were even relations with one of the South Chinese states; in the same way, Kao-li continuously played one state against the other (M. Rogers et al.).
      p. 223: On the Kara-Kitai see Appendix to Wittfogel-Feng.
      p. 228: For the Hakka, I relied mainly upon Lo Hsiang-lin; for Chia Ssu-tao upon H. Franke.
      p. 229: The Juchen (Jurchen) are also called Nue-chih and Nue-chen, but Juchen seems to be correct (Studia Serica, vol. 3, No. 2).
      Chapter Ten
      p. 233: I use here mainly Meng Ssu-liang, but also others, such as Chue Ch'ing-yuean and Li Chien-nung.—The early political developments are described by H.D. Martin, The Rise of Chingis Khan and his Conquest of North China, Baltimore 1950.
      p. 236: I am alluding here to such Taoist sects as the Cheng-i-chiao (Sun K'o-k'uan and especially the study in Kita Aziya gakuh[=o], vol. 2).
      pp. 236-7: For taxation and all other economic questions I have relied upon Wan Kuo-ting and especially upon H. Franke. The first part of the main economic text is translated and annotated by H.F. Schurmann, Economic Structure of the Yuean Dynasty, Cambridge, Mass., 1956.
      p. 237: On migrations see T. Makino and others.—For the system of communications during the Mongol time and the privileges of merchants, I used P. Olbricht.
      p. 238: For the popular rebellions of this time, I used a study in the Bull. Acad. Sinica, vol. 10, 1948, but also Meng Ssu-liang and others.
      p. 239: On the White Lotus Society (Pai-lien-hui) see note to previous page and an article by Hagiwara Jumpei.
      p. 240: H. Serruys, The Mongols in China during the Hung-wu Period, Bruges 1959, has studied in this book and in an article the fate of isolated Mongol groups in China after the breakdown of the dynasty.
      pp. 241-2: The travel report of Ch'ang-ch'un has been translated by A. Waley, The Travels of an Alchemist, London 1931.
      p. 242: Hsi-hsiang-chi has been translated by S.I. Hsiung. The Romance of the Western Chamber, London 1935. All important analytic literature on drama and theatre is written by Chinese and Japanese authors, especially by Yoshikawa Kojiro.—For Bon and early Lamaism, I used H. Hoffmann.
      p. 243: Lamaism in Mongolia disappeared later, however, and was reintroduced in the reformed form (Tsong-kha-pa, 1358-1419) in the sixteenth century. See R.J. Miller, Monasteries and Culture Change in Inner Mongolia, Wiesbaden 1959.
      p. 245: Much more research is necessary to clarify Japanese-Chinese relations in this period, especially to determine the size of trade. Good material is in the article by S. Iwao. Important is also S. Sakuma and an article in Li-shih yen-chiu 1955, No. 3. For the loss of coins, I relied upon D. Brown.
      p. 246: The necessity of transports of grain and salt was one of the reasons for the emergence of the Hsin-an and Hui-chou merchants. The importance of these developments is only partially known (studies mainly by H. Fujii and in Li-shih-yen-chiu 1955, No. 3). Data are also in an unpublished thesis by Ch. Mac Sherry, The Impairment of the Ming Tributary System, and in an article by Wang Ch'ung-wu.
      p. 247: The tax system of the Ming has been studied among others by Liang Fang-chung. Yoshiyuki Suto analysed the methods of tax evasion in the periods before the reform. For the land grants, I used Wan Kuo-ting's data.
      p. 248: Based mainly upon my own research. On the progress of agriculture wrote Li Chien-nung and also Kat[=o] Shigeru and others.
      p. 250: I believe that further research would discover that the “agrarian revolution” was a key factor in the economic and social development of China. It probably led to another change in dietary habits; it certainly led to a greater labour input per person, i.e. a higher number of full working days per year than before. It may be—but only further research can try to show this—that the “agrarian revolution” turned China away from technology and industry.—On cotton and its importance see the studies by M. Amano, and some preliminary remarks by P. Pelliot.
      pp. 250-1: Detailed study of Central Chinese urban centres in this time is a great desideratum. My remarks here have to be taken as very preliminary. Notice the special character of the industries mentioned!—The porcelain centre of Ching-te-chen was inhabited by workers and merchants (70-80 per cent of population); there were more than 200 private kilns.—On indented labour see Li Chien-nung, H. Iwami and Y. Yamane.
      p. 253: On pien-wen I used R. Michihata, and for this general discussion R. Irvin, The Evolution of a Chinese Novel, Cambridge, Mass., 1953, and studies by J. Jaworski and J. Pru[vs]ek. Many texts of pien-wen and related styles have been found in Tunhuang and have been recently republished by Chinese scholars.
      p. 254: Shui-hu-chuan has been translated by Pearl Buck, All Men are Brothers. Parts of Hsi-yu-chi have been translated by A. Waley, Monkey, London 1946. San-kuo yen-i is translated by C.H. Brewitt-Taylor, San Kuo, or Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Shanghai 1925 (a new edition just published). A purged translation of Chin-p'ing-mei is published by Fr. Kuhn Chin P'ing Mei, New York 1940.
      p. 255: Even the “murder story” was already known in Ming time. An example is R.H. van Gulik, Dee Gong An. Three Murder Cases solved by Judge Dee, Tokyo 1949.
      p. 256: For a special group of block-prints see R.H. van Gulik, Erotic Colour Prints of the Ming Dynasty, Tokyo 1951. This book is also an excellent introduction into Chinese psychology.
      p. 257: Here I use work done by David Chan.
      p. 258: I use here the research of J.J.L. Duyvendak; the reasons for the end of such enterprises, as given here, may not exhaust the problem. It may not be without relevance that Cheng came from a Muslim family. His father was a pilgrim (Bull. Chin. Studies, vol. 3, pp. 131-70). Further research is desirable.—Concerning folk-tales, I use my own research. The main Buddhist tales are the Jataka stories. They are still used by Burmese Buddhists in the same context.
      p. 260: The Oirat (Uyrat, Ojrot, Oeloet) were a confederation of four tribal groups: Khosud, Dzungar, Doerbet and Turgut.
      p. 261: I regard this analysis of Ming political history as unsatisfactory, but to my knowledge no large-scale analysis has been made.—For Wang Yang-ming I use mainly my own research.
      p. 262: For the coastal salt-merchants I used Lo Hsiang-lin's work.
      p. 263: On the rifles I used P. Pelliot. There is a large literature on the use of explosives and the invention of cannons, especially L.C. Goodrich and Feng Chia-sheng in Isis, vol. 36, 1946 and 39, 1948; also G. Sarton, Li Ch'iao-p'ing, J. Pru[vs]ek, J. Needham, and M. Ishida; a comparative, general study is by K. Huuri, Studia Orientalia vol. 9, 1941.—For the earliest contacts of Wang with Portuguese, I used Chang Wei-hua's monograph.—While there is no satisfactory, comprehensive study in English on Wang, for Lu Hsiang-shan the book by Huang Siu-ch'i, Lu Hsiang-shan, a Twelfth-century Chinese Idealist Philosopher, New Haven 1944, can be used.
      p. 264: For Tao-yen, I used work done by David Chan.—Large parts of the Yung-lo ta-tien are now lost (Kuo Po-kung, Yuean T'ung-li studied this problem).
      p. 265: Yen-ta's Mongol name is Altan Qan (died 1582), leader of the Tuemet. He is also responsible for the re-introduction of Lamaism into Mongolia (1574).—For the border trade I used Hou Jen-chih; for the Shansi bankers Ch'en Ch'i-t'ien and P. Maybon. For the beginnings of the Manchu see Fr. Michael, The Origins of Manchu Rule in China, Baltimore 1942.
      p. 266: M. Ricci's diary (Matthew Ricci, China in the Sixteenth Century. The Journals of M. Ricci, transl. by L.J. Gallagher, New York 1953) gives much insight into the life of Chinese officials in this period. Recently, J. Needham has tried to show that Ricci and his followers did not bring much which was not already known in China, but that they actually attempted to prevent the Chinese from learning about the Copernican theory.
      p. 267: For Coxinga I used M. Eder's study.—The Szechwan rebellion was led by Chang Hsien-chung (1606-1647); I used work done by James B. Parsons. Cheng T'ien-t'ing, Sun Yueh and others have recently published the important documents concerning all late Ming peasant rebellions.—For the Tung-lin academy see Ch. O. Hucker in J.K. Fairbank, Chinese Thought and Institutions, Chicago 1957. A different interpretation is indicated by Shang Yueeh in Li-shih yen-chiu 1955, No. 3.
      p. 268: Work on the “academies” (shu-yuean) in the earlier time is done by Ho Yu-shen.
      pp. 273-4: Based upon my own, as yet unfinished research.
      p. 274: The population of 1953 as given here, includes Chinese outside of mainland China. The population of mainland China was 582.6 millions. If the rate of increase of about 2 per cent per year has remained the same, the population of mainland China in 1960 may be close to 680 million. In general see P.T. Ho. Studies on the Population of China, 1368-1953, Cambridge, Mass., 1960.
      p. 276: Based upon my own research.—A different view of the development of Chinese industry is found in Norman Jacobs, Modern Capitalism and Eastern Asia, Hong Kong 1958. Jacobs attempted a comparison of China with Japan and with Europe. Different again is Marion Levy and Shih Kuo-heng, The Rise of the Modern Chinese Business Class, New York 1949. Both books are influenced by the sociological theories of T. Parsons.
      p. 277: The Dzungars (Dsunghar; Chun-ko-erh) are one of the four Oeloet (Oirat) groups. I am here using studies by E. Haenisch and W. Fuchs.
      p. 278: Tibetan-Chinese relations have been studied by L. Petech, China and Tibet in the Early 18th Century, Leiden 1950. A collection of data is found in M.W. Fisher and L.E. Rose, England, India, Nepal, Tibet, China, 1765-1958, Berkeley 1959. For diplomatic relations and tributary systems of this period, I referred to J.K. Fairbank and Teng Ssu-yue.
      p. 279: For Ku Yen-wu, I used the work by H. Wilhelm.—A man who deserves special mention in this period is the scholar Huang Tsung-hsi (1610-1695) as the first Chinese who discussed the possibility of a non-monarchic form of government in his treatise of 1662. For him see Lin Mou-sheng, Men and Ideas, New York 1942, and especially W.T. de Bary in J.K. Fairbank, Chinese Thought and Institutions, Chicago 1957.
      pp. 280-1: On Liang see now J.R. Levenson, Liang Ch'i-ch'ao and the Mind of Modern China, London 1959.
      p. 282: It should also be pointed out that the Yung-cheng emperor was personally more inclined towards Lamaism.—The Kalmuks are largely identical with the above-mentioned Oeloet.
      p. 286: The existence of hong is known since 1686, see P'eng Tse-i and Wang Chu-an's recent studies. For details on foreign trade see H.B. Morse, The Chronicles of the East India Company Trading to China 1635-1834, Oxford 1926, 4 vols., and J.K. Fairbank, Trade and Diplomacy on the China Coast. The Opening of the Treaty Ports, 1842-1854, Cambridge, Mass., 1953, 2 vols.—For Lin I used G.W. Overdijkink's study.
      p. 287: On customs read St. F. Wright, Hart and the Chinese Customs, Belfast 1950.
      p. 288: For early industry see A. Feuerwerker, China's Early Industrialization: Sheng Hsuan-huai (1844-1916), Cambridge, Mass., 1958.
      p. 289: The Chinese source materials for the Mohammedan revolts have recently been published, but an analysis of the importance of the revolts still remains to be done.—On T'ai-p'ing much has been published, especially in the last years in China, so that all documents are now available. I used among other studies, details brought out by Lo Hsiang-lin and Jen Yu-wen.
      p. 291: For Tseng Kuo-fan see W.J. Hail, Tseng Kuo-fan and the T'ai-p'ing Rebellion, New Haven 1927, but new research on him is about to be published.—The Nien-fei had some connection with the White Lotus, and were known since 1814, see Chiang Siang-tseh, The Nien Rebellion, Seattle 1954.
      p. 292: Little is known about Salars, Dungans and Yakub Beg's rebellion, mainly because relevant Turkish sources have not yet been studied. On Salars see L. Schram, The Monguors of Kansu, Philadelphia 1954, p. 23 and P. Pelliot; on Dungans see I. Grebe.
      p. 293: On Tso Tsung-t'ang see G. Ch'en, Tso Tung T'ang, Pioneer Promotor of the Modern Dockyard and Woollen Mill in China, Peking 1938, and Yenching Journal of Soc. Studies, vol. I.
      p. 294: For the T'ung-chih period, see now Mary C. Wright, The Last Stand of Chinese Conservativism. The T'ung-chih Restoration, 1862-1874, Stanford 1957.
      p. 295: Ryukyu is Chinese: Liu-ch'iu; Okinawa is one of the islands of this group.—Formosa is Chinese: T'ai-wan (Taiwan). Korea is Chinese: Chao-hsien, Japanese: Chosen.
      p. 297: M.C. Wright has shown the advisers around the ruler before the Empress Dowager realized the severity of the situation.—Much research is under way to study the beginning of industrialization of Japan, and my opinions have changed greatly, due to the research done by Japanese scholars and such Western scholars as H. Rosovsky and Th. Smith. The eminent role of the lower aristocracy has been established. Similar research for China has not even seriously started. My remarks are entirely preliminary.
      p. 298: For K'ang Yo-wei, I use work done by O. Franke and others. See M.E. Cameron, The Reform Movement in China, 1898-1921, Stanford 1921. The best bibliography for this period is J.K. Fairbank and Liu Kwang-ching, Modern China: A Bibliographical Guide to Chinese Works, 1898-1937, Cambridge, Mass., 1950. The political history of the time, as seen by a Chinese scholar, is found in Li Chien-nung, The Political History of China 1840-1928, Princeton 1956.—For the social history of this period see Chang Chung-li, The Chinese Gentry, Seattle 1955.—For the history of Tz[)u] Hsi Bland-Backhouse, China under the Empress Dowager, Peking 1939 (Third ed.) is antiquated, but still used. For some of K'ang Yo-wei's ideas, see now K'ang Yo-wei: Ta T'ung Shu. The One World Philosophy of K'ang Yu Wei, London 1957.
      Chapter Eleven
      p. 305: I rely here partly upon W. Franke's recent studies. For Sun Yat-sen (Sun I-hsien; also called Sun Chung-shan) see P. Linebarger, Sun Yat-sen and the Chinese Republic, Cambridge, Mass., 1925 and his later The Political Doctrines of Sun Yat-sen, Baltimore 1937.—Independently, Atatuerk in Turkey developed a similar theory of the growth of democracy.
      p. 306: On student activities see Kiang Wen-han, The Ideological Background of the Chinese Student Movement, New York 1948.
      p. 307: On Hu Shih see his own The Chinese Renaissance, Chicago 1934 and J. de Francis, Nationalism and Language Reform in China, Princeton 1950.
      p. 310: The declaration of Independence of Mongolia had its basis in the early treaty of the Mongols with the Manchus (1636): “In case the Tai Ch'ing Dynasty falls, you will exist according to previous basic laws” (R.J. Miller, Monasteries and Culture Change in Inner Mongolia, Wiesbaden 1959, p. 4).
      p. 315: For the military activities see F.F. Liu, A Military History of Modern China, 1924-1949, Princeton 1956. A Marxist analysis of the 1927 events is Manabendra Nath Roy, Revolution and Counter-Revolution in China, Calcutta 1946; the relevant documents are translated in C. Brandt, B. Schwartz, J.K. Fairbank, A Documentary History of Chinese Communism, Cambridge, Mass., 1952.
      Chapter Twelve
      For Mao Tse-tung, see B. Schwartz, Chinese Communism and the Rise of Mao, second ed., Cambridge, Mass., 1958. For Mao's early years; see J.E. Rue, Mao Tse-tung in Opposition, 1927-1935, Stanford 1966. For the civil war, see L.M. Chassin, The Communist Conquest of China: A History of the Civil War, 1945-1949, Cambridge, Mass., 1965. For brief information on communist society, see Franz Schurmann and Orville Schell, The China Reader, vol. 3, Communist China, New York 1967. For problems of organization, see Franz Schurmann, Ideology and Organization in Communist China, Berkeley 1966. For cultural and political problems, see Ho Ping-ti, China in Crisis, vol. 1, China's Heritage and the Communist Political System, Chicago 1968. For a sympathetic view of rural life in communist China, see J. Myrdal, Report from a Chinese Village, New York 1966; for Taiwanese village life, see Bernard Gallin, Hsin Hsing, Taiwan: A Chinese Village in Change, Berkeley 1966.
      INDEX
        Abahai, ruler
  Abdication
  Aborigines
  Absolutism (see Despotism, Dictator, Emperor, Monarchy)
  Academia Sinica
  Academies
  Administration;
    provincial
    (see Army, Feudalism, Bureaucracy)
  Adobe (Mud bricks)
  Adoptions
  Afghanistan
  Africa
  Agriculture;
    development;
    Origin of;
    of Shang;
    shifting (denshiring)
    (see Wheat, Millet, Rice, Plough, Irrigation, Manure, Canals,
      Fallow)
  An Ti, ruler of Han
  Ainu, tribes
  Ala-shan mountain range
  Alchemy (see Elixir)
  Alexander the Great
  America (see United States)
  Amithabha, god
  Amur, river
  An Chi-yeh, rebel
  An Lu-shan, rebel
  Analphabetism
  Anarchists
  Ancestor, cult
  Aniko, sculptor
  Animal style
  Annam (Vietnam)
  Anyang (Yin-ch'ue)
  Arabia;
    Arabs
  Architecture
  Aristocracy (see Nobility, Feudalism)
  Army, cost of;
    organization of;
    size of;
    Tibetan
    (see War, Militia, tu-tu, pu-ch'ue)
  Art, Buddhist (see Animal style, Architecture, Pottery, Painting,
    Sculpture, Wood-cut)
  Arthashastra, book, attributed to Kautilya
  Artisans;
    Organizations of
    (see Guilds, Craftsmen)
  Assimilation (see Colonization)
  Astronomy
  Austroasiatics
  Austronesians
  Avars, tribe (see Juan-juan)
  Axes, prehistoric
  Axis, policy
        Babylon
  Baghdad, city
  Balasagun, city
  Ballads
  Banks
  Banner organization
  Barbarians (Foreigners)
  Bastards
  Bath
  Beg, title
  Beggar
  Bengal
  Boat festival
  Bokhara (Bukhara), city
  Bon, religion
  Bondsmen (see pu-ch'ue, Serfs, Feudalism)
  Book, printing;
    B burning
  Boettger, inventor
  Boxer rebellion
  Boycott
  Brahmans, Indian caste
  Brain drain
  Bronze (see Metal, Copper)
  Brothel (Tea-house)
  Buddha;
    Buddhism
    (see Ch'an, Vinaya, Sects, Amithabha, Maitreya, Hinayana,
  Mahayana, Monasteries, Church, Pagoda, Monks, Lamaism)
  Budget (see Treasury, Inflation, Deflation)
  Bullfights
  Bureaucracy;
    religious B
    (see Administration; Army)
  Burgher (liang-min)
  Burma
  Businessmen (see Merchants, Trade)
  Byzantium
        Calcutta, city
  Caliph (Khaliph)
  Cambodia
  Canals;
    Imperial C
    (see Irrigation)
  Cannons
  Canton (Kuang-chou), city
  Capital of Empire (see Ch'ang-an, Sian, Loyang, etc.)
  Capitalism (see Investments, Banks, Money, Economy, etc.)
  Capitulations (privileges of foreign nations)
  Caravans (see Silk road, Trade)
  Carpet
  Castes, (see Brahmans)
  Castiglione, G., painter
  Cattle, breeding
  Cavalry, (see Horse)
  Cave temples (see Lung-men, Yuen-kang, Tunhuang)
  Censorate
  Censorship
  Census (see Population)
  Central Asia (see Turkestan, Sinkiang, Tarim, City States)
  Champa, State
  Ch'an (Zen), meditative Buddhism
  Chan-kuo Period (Contending States)
  Chancellor
  Ch'ang-an, capital of China (see Sian)
  Chang Ch'ien, ambassador
  Chang Chue-chan, teacher
  Chang Hsien-chung, rebel
  Chang Hsueeh-hang, war lord
  Chang Ling, popular leader
  Chang Ti, ruler
  Chang Tsai, philosopher
  Chang Tso-lin, war lord
  Chao, state;
    Earlier Chao;
    Later Chao
  Chao K'uang-yin (T'ai Tsu), ruler
  Chao Meng-fu, painter
  Charters
  Chefoo Convention
  Ch'en, dynasty
  Ch'en Pa-hsien, ruler
  Ch'en Tu-hsiu, intellectual
  Ch'eng Hao, philosopher
  Cheng Ho, navy commander
  Ch'eng I, philosopher
  Cheng-i-chiao, religion
  Ch'eng Ti, ruler of Han;
    ruler of Chin
  Ch'eng Tsu, ruler of Manchu
  Ch'engtu, city
  Ch'i, state;
    short dynasty;
    Northern Ch'i
  Ch'i-fu, clan
  Chi-nan, city
  Ch'i-tan (see Kitan)
  Ch'i Wan-nien, leader
  Chia, clan
  Chia-ch'ing, period
  Chia Ss[)u]-tao, politician
  Ch'iang, tribes, (see Tanguts)
  Chiang Kai-shek, president
  Ch'ien-lung, period
  ch'ien-min (commoners),
  Chin, dynasty, (see Juchen);
    dynasty;
    Eastern Chin dynasty;
    Later Chin dynasty,
  Ch'in, state;
    Ch'in, dynasty;
    Earlier Ch'in dynasty;
    Later Ch'in dynasty;
    Western Ch'in dynasty
  Ch'in K'ui, politician
  Chinese, origin of
  Ching Fang, scholar
  Ching-te (-chen), city
  ching-t'ien system
  Ching Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Ch'iu Ying, painter
  Chou, dynasty;
    short Chou dynasty;
    Later Chou dynasty;
    Northern Chou dynasty
  Chou En-lai, politician
  Chou-k'ou-tien, archaeological site
  Chou-kung (Duke of Chou)
  Chou-li, book
  Chou Tun-i, philosopher
  Christianity (see Nestorians, Jesuits, Missionaries)
  Chronology
  Ch'u, state
  Chu Ch'uean-chung, general and ruler
  Chu Hsi, philosopher
  Chu-ko Liang, general
  Chu Te, general
  Chu Tsai-yue, scholar
  Chu Yuean-chang (T'ai Tsu), ruler
  chuang (see Manors, Estates)
  Chuang Tz[)u], philosopher
  Chuen-ch'en, ruler
  Ch'un-ch'iu, book
  chuen-t'ien system (land equalization system)
  chuen-tz[)u] (gentleman)
  Chung-ch'ang T'ung, philosopher
  Chungking (Ch'ung-ch'ing), city
  Church, Buddhistic
    Taoistic
    (see Chang Ling)
  Cities
    spread and growth of cities
    origin of cities
    twin cities
    (see City states, Ch'ang-an, Sian, Loyang, Hankow, etc.)
  City States (of Central Asia)
  Clans
  Classes, social classes
    (see Castes, ch'ien-min, liang-min, Gentry, etc.)
  Climate, changes
  Cliques
  Cloisonne
  Cobalt
  Coins (see Money)
  Colonialism (see Imperialism)
  Colonization (see Migration, Assimilation)
  Colour prints
  Communes
  Communism (see Marxism, Socialism, Soviets)
  Concubines
  Confessions
  Confucian ritual
    Confucianism
    Confucian literature
    false Confucian literature
    Confucians
    (see Neo-Confucianism)
  Conquests (see War, Colonialism)
  Conservatism
  Constitution
  Contending States
  Co-operatives
  Copper (see Bronze, Metal)
  Corruption
  Corvee (forced labour) (see Labour)
  Cotton
  Courtesans (see Brothel)
  Coxinga, rebel
  Craftsmen (see Artisans)
  Credits
  Criminals
  Crop rotation
        Dalai Lama, religious ruler of Tibet
  Dance
  Deflation
  Deities (see T'ien, Shang Ti, Maitreya, Amithabha, etc.)
  Delft, city
  Demands, the twenty-one
  Democracy
  Denshiring
  Despotism (see Absolutism)
  Dewey, J., educator
  Dialects (see Language)
  Dialecticians
  Dictators (see Despotism)
  Dictionaries
  Diploma, for monks
  Diplomacy
  Disarmament
  Discriminatory laws (see Double Standard)
  Dog
  Dorgon, prince
  Double standard, legal
  Drama
  Dress, changes
  Dungan, tribes
  Dynastic histories (see History)
  Dzungars, people
        Eclipses
  Economy
    Money economy
    Natural economy
    (see Agriculture, Nomadism, Industry, Denshiring, Money, Trade, etc.)
  Education (see Schools, Universities, Academies, Script,
    Examination system, etc.)
  Elements, the five
  Elephants
  Elite (see Intellectuals, Students, Gentry)
  Elixir (see Alchemy)
  Emperor, position of
    Emperor and church
    (see Despotism, King, Absolutism, Monarchy, etc.)
  Empress (see Lue, Wu, Wei, Tz[)u] Hsi)
  Encyclopaedias
  England (see Great Britain)
  Ephtalites, tribe
  Epics
  Equalization Office (see chuen-t'ien)
  Erotic literature
  Estates (chuang)
  Ethics (see Confucianism)
  Eunuchs
  Europe
    Europeans
  Examination system
    Examinations for Buddhists
        Fables
  Factories
  Fallow system
  Falsifications (see Confucianism)
  Family structure
    Family ethics
    Family planning
  Fan Chung-yen, politician
  Fascism
  Federations, tribal
  Felt
  Feng Kuo-chang, politician
  Feng Meng-lung, writer
  Feng Tao, politician
  Feng Yue-hsiang, war lord
  Ferghana, city
  Fertility cults
    differential fertility
  Fertilizer
  Feudalism
    end of feudalism
    late feudalism
    new feudalism
    nomadic feudalism
    (see Serfs, Aristocracy, Fiefs, Bondsmen, etc.)
  Fiefs
  Finances (see Budget, Inflation, Money, Coins)
  Fire-arms (see Rifles, Cannons)
  Fishing
  Folk-tales
  Food habits
  Foreign relations (see Diplomacy, Treaty, Tribute, War)
  Forests
  Formosa (T'aiwan)
  France
  Frontier, concept of
  Frugality
  Fu Chien, ruler
  Fu-lan-chi (Franks)
  Fu-lin, Manchu ruler
  Fu-yue, country
  Fukien, province
        Galdan, leader
  Gandhara, country
  Gardens
  Geisha (see Courtesans)
  Genealogy
  Genghiz Khan, ruler
  Gentry (Upper class)
    colonial gentry
    definition of gentry
    gentry state
    southern gentry
  Germany
  Goek Turks
  Governors, role of
  Grain (see Millet, Rice, Wheat)
  Granaries
  Great Britain (see England)
  Great Leap Forward
  Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution
  Great Wall
  Greeks
  Guilds
        Hakka, ethnic group
  Hami, city state
  Han, dynasty
    Later Han dynasty
  Han Fei Tz[)u], philosopher
  Han T'o-wei, politician
  Han Yue, philosopher
  Hankow (Han-k'ou), city
  Hangchow (Hang-chou), city
  Heaven (see Shang Ti, T'ien)
  Hermits (see Monks, Sages)
  Hinayana, religion
  Historians
  Histories, dynastic
    falsification of histories
  Historiography
  Hitler, Adolf, dictator
  Hittites, ethnic group
  Ho Ch'eng-t'ien, scholar
  Ho-lien P'o-p'o, ruler
  Ho Ti, Han ruler
  hong, association
  Hong Kong, colony
  Hopei, province
  Horse
    horse chariot
    horse riding
    horse trade
  Hospitals
  Hou Ching, ruler
  Houses (see Adobe)
  Hsi-hsia, kingdom
  Hsi-k'ang, Tibet
  Hsia, dynasty
    Hunnic Hsia dynasty
    (see Hsi-hsia)
  Hsia-hou, clan
  Hsia Kui, painter
  Hsiao Tao-ch'eng, general
  Hsiao Wu Ti, Chin ruler
  Hsieh, clan
  Hsieh Hsuean, general
  Hsien-feng, period
  Hsien-pi, tribal federation
  Hsien Ti, Han ruler
  Hsien-yuen, tribes
  Hsin, dynasty
  Hsin-an merchants
  Hsin Ch'ing-nien, journal
  Hsiung-nu, tribal federation (see Huns)
  Hsue Shih-ch'ang, president
  Hsuean-te, period
  Hsuean-tsang, Buddhist
  Hsuean Tsung, T'ang ruler
    Manchu ruler
  Hsuean-t'ung, period
  Hsuen Tz[)u], philosopher
  Hu, name of tribes (see Huns)
  Hu Han-min, politician
  Hu Shih, scholar and politician
  Hu Wei-yung, politician
  Huai-nan Tz[)u], philosopher
  Huai, Ti, Chin ruler
  Huan Hsuean, general
  Huan Wen, general
  Huang Ch'ao, leader of rebellion
  Huang Ti, ruler
  Huang Tsung-hsi, philosopher
  Hui-chou merchants
  hui-kuan, association
  Hui Ti, Chin ruler
    Manchu ruler
  Hui Tsung, Sung ruler
  Hui Tz[)u], philosopher
  Human sacrifice
  Hung Hsiu-ch'uean, leader of rebellion
  Huns (see Hu, Hsiung-nu)
  Hunting
  Hutuktu, religious ruler
  Hydraulic society
        i-chuang, clan manors
  Ili, river
  Imperialism (see Colonialism)
  India (see Brahmans, Bengal, Gandhara, Calcutta, Buddhism)
  Indo-China (see Cambodia, Annam, Laos).
  Indo-Europeans, language group (see Yueeh-chih, Tocharians,
    Hittites)
  Indonesia, (see Java)
  Industries
    Industrialization
    Industrial society
    (see Factories)
  Inflation
  Inheritance, laws of
  Intellectuals (see Elite, Students)
  Investments
  Iran (Persia)
  Iron
    Cast iron
    Iron money
    (see Steel)
  Irrigation
  Islam (see Muslims)
  Istanbul (Constantinople)
  Italy
  Japan (see Meiji, Tada, Tanaka)
  Java
  Jedzgerd, ruler,
  Jehol, province,
  Jen Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Jesuits
  Jews
  Ju (scribes)
  Juchen (Chin Dynasty, Jurchen)
  Juan-juan, tribal federation
  Jurchen (see Juchen)
        K'ai-feng, city (see Yeh, Pien-liang)
  Kalmuk, Mongol tribes (see Oeloet)
  K'ang-hsi, period
  K'ang Yo-wei, politician and scholar
  Kansu, province (see Tunhuang)
  Kao-ch'ang, city state
  Kao, clan
  Kao-li, state (see Korea)
  Kao Ming, writer
  Kao Tsu, Han ruler
  Kao Tsung, T'ang ruler
  Kao Yang, ruler
  Kapok, textile fibre
  Kara Kitai, tribal federation
  Kashgar, city
  Kazak, tribal federation
  Khalif (see Caliph)
  Khamba, Tibetans
  Khan, Central Asian title
  Khocho, city
  Khotan, city
  King, position of
    first kings
    religious character of kingship
    (see Yao, Shun, Hsia dynasty, Emperor, Wang, Prince)
  Kitan (Ch'i-tan), tribal federation (see Liao dynasty)
  Ko-shu Han, general
  Korea (see Kao-li, Pai-chi, Sin-lo)
  K'ou Ch'ien-chih, Taoist
  Kowloon, city
  Ku Yen-wu, geographer
  Kuan Han-ch'ing, writer
  Kuang-hsue, period
  Kuang-wu Ti, Han ruler
  Kub(i)lai Khan, Mongol ruler
  Kung-sun Lung, philosopher
  K'ung Tz[)u] (Confucius)
  Kuomintang (KMT), party
  Kuo Wei, ruler
  Kuo Tz[)u]-hsing, rebel leader
  Kuo Tz[)u]-i, loyal general
  Kyakhta (Kiachta), city
        Labour, forced (see Corvee)
    Labour laws
    Labour shortage
  Lacquer
  Lamaism, religion
  Land ownership (see Property)
    Land reform (see chuen-t'ien, ching-t'ien)
  Landlords
    temples as landlords
  Language
    dialects
    Language reform
  Lang Shih-ning, painter
  La Tz[)u], philosopher
  Laos, country
  Law codes (see Li K'ui, Property law, Inheritance, Legalists)
  Leadership
  League of Nations
  Leibniz, philosopher
  Legalists (fa-chia)
  Legitimacy of rule (see Abdication)
  Lenin, V.
  Lhasa, city
  Li An-shih, economist
  Li Chung-yen, governor
  Li Hung-chang, politician
  Li K'o-yung, ruler
  Li Kuang-li, general
  Li K'ui, law-maker
  Li Li-san, politician
  Li Lin-fu, politician
  Li Lung-mien, painter
  Li Shih-min (see T'ai Tsung), T'ang ruler
  Li Ss[)u], politician
  Li Ta-chao, librarian
  Li T'ai-po, poet
  Li Tz[)u]-ch'eng, rebel
  Li Yu, writer
  Li Yu-chen, writer
  Li Yuean, ruler
  Li Yuean-hung, politician
  Liang dynasty, Earlier
    Later Liang
    Northern Liang
    Southern Liang
    Western Liang
  Liang Ch'i-ch'ao, journalist
  liang-min (burghers)
  Liao, tribes,
    Liao dynasty (see Kitan)
    Western Liao dynasty
  Liao-chai chih-i, short-story collection
  Libraries
  Lin-chin, city
  Lin-ch'uan, city
  Lin Shu, translator
  Lin Tse-hsue, politician
  Literati, (see Scholars, Confucianists)
  Literature (see pien-wen, pi-chi, Poetry, Drama, Novels, Epics,
    Theatre, ballads, Folk-tales, Fables, History, Confucians, Writers,
    Scholars, Scribes)
  Literary revolution
  Liu Chi, Han ruler
  Liu Chin-yuean, ruler
  Liu Chin, eunuch
  Liu Hsiu (see Kuang wu Ti), Han ruler
  Liu Lao-chih, general
  liu-min (vagrants)
  Liu Pang (see Liu Chi)
  Liu Pei, general and ruler
  Liu Shao-ch'i, political leader
  Liu Sung, rebel
  Liu Tsung-yuean, writer
  Liu Ts'ung, ruler
  Liu Yao, ruler
  Liu Yue, general
    emperor
  Liu Yuean, sculptor
    emperor
  Lo Kuan-chung, writer
  Loans, to farmers
    foreign
  Loess, soil formation
  Logic
  Long March
  Lorcha War
  Loyang (Lo-yang), capital of China
  Lu, state
  Lue, empress
  Lu Hsiang-shan, philosopher
  Lu Hsuen, writer
  Lue Kuang, ruler
  Lue Pu, general
  Lue Pu-wei, politician
  Lun, prince
  Lun-heng, book
  Lung-men, place
  Lung-shan, excavation site
  Lytton Commission
  Ma Yin, ruler
  Ma Yuean, general
    painter
  Machiavellism
  Macao, Portuguese colony
  Mahayana, Buddhist sect
  Maitreya, Buddhist deity (see Messianic movements)
  Malacca, state
  Malaria
  Managers
  Manchu, tribal federation and dynasty
  Manchuria
  Manichaeism, Iranian religion
  Manors (chuang, see Estates)
  Mao Tun, Hsiung-nu ruler
  Mao Tse-tung, party leader
  Marco Polo, businessman
  Market
    Market control
  Marriage systems
  Marxism
    Marxist theory of history
    (see Materialism, Communism, Lenin, Mao Tse-tung)
  Materialism
  Mathematics
  Matrilinear societies
  Mazdaism, Iranian religion
  May Fourth Movement
  Medicine
    Medical doctors
  Meditation (see Ch'an)
  Megalithic culture
  Meiji, Japanese ruler
  Melanesia
  Mencius (Meng Tz[)u]), philosopher
  Merchants
    foreign merchants
    (see Trade, Salt, Caravans, Businessmen)
  Messianic movements
  Metal (see Bronze, Copper, Iron)
  Mi Fei, painter
  Middle Class (see Burgher, Merchant, Craftsmen, Artisans)
  Middle East (see Near East)
  Migrations
    forced migrations
    (see Colonization, Assimilation, Settlement)
  Militarism
  Militia
  Millet
  Mills
  Min, state in Fukien
  Ming dynasty
  Ming Jui, general
  Min Ti, Chin ruler
  Ming Ti, Han ruler
    Wei ruler
    Later T'ang ruler
  Minorate
  Missionaries, Christian (see Jesuits)
  Mo Ti, philosopher
  Modernization
  Mohammedan rebellions (see Muslim)
  Mon-Khmer tribes
  Monarchy (see King, Emperor, Absolutism, Despotism)
  Monasteries, Buddhist
    economic importance
  Money
    Money economy
    Origin of money
    paper money
    (see Coins, Paper, Silver)
  Mongolia
  Mongols, tribes, tribal federation, dynasty (see Yuean dynasty,
    Kalmuk, Tuemet, Oirat, Oeloet, Naiman, Turgut, Timur, Genghiz, Kublai)
  Monks, Buddhist
  Monopolies
  Mound-dwellers
  Mu-jung, tribes
  Mu Ti, East Chin ruler
  Mu Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Mulberries
  Munda tribes
  Music (see Theatre, Dance, Geisha)
  Muslims
    Muslim rebellions
    (see Islam, Mohammedans)
  Mysticism
        Naiman, Mongol tribe
  Nan-chao, state
  Nanyang, city
  Nanking (Nan-ching), capital of China
    Nanking regime
  Nationalism (see Kuomintang)
  Nature
    Nature philosophers
  Navy
  Near East (see Arabs, Iran, etc.)
  Neo-Confucianism
  Neolithicum
  Nepal
  Nerchinsk, place
  Nestorian Christianity
  Ni Tsan, painter
  Nien Fei, rebels
  Niu Seng-yu, politician
  Nobility
    Nomadic nobility
    (see Aristocracy)
  Nomadism
    Economy of nomads
    Nomadic society structure
  Novels
        Oil
  Oirat, Mongol tribes
  Okinawa (see Ryukyu)
  Oeloet, Mongol tribes
  Opera
  Opium
    Opium War
  Oracle bones
  Ordos, area
  Orenburg, city
  Organizations (see hui-kuan Guilds, hong, Secret Societies)
  Orphanages
  Ottoman (Turkish) Empire
  Ou-yang Hsiu, writer
  Outer Mongolia
        Pagoda
  Pai-chi (Paikche), state in Korea
  Pai-lien-hui (see White Lotus)
  Painting
  Palaeolithicum
  Pan Ch'ao, general
  pao-chia, security system
  Paper
    Paper money
    (see Money)
  Parliament
  Party (see Kuomintang, Communists)
  Pearl Harbour
  Peasant rebellions (see Rebellions)
  Peking, city
    Peking Man
  Pensions
  People's Democracy
  Persecution, religious
  Persia (Iran)
    Persian language
  Peruz, ruler
  Philippines, state
  Philosophy, (see Confucius, Lao Tz[)u], Chuang Tz[)u],
    Huai-nan Tz[)u], Hsuen Tz[)u], Mencius, Hui Tz[)u], Mo Ti,
    Kung-sun Lung, Shang Tz[)u], Han Fei Tz[)u], Tsou Yen, Legalists,
    Chung-ch'ang, T'ung, Yuean Chi, Liu Ling, Chu Hsi, Ch'eng Hao,
    Lu Hsiang-shan, Wang Yang-ming, etc.)
  pi-chi, literary form
  pieh-yeh (see Manor)
  Pien-liang, city (see K'ai-feng)
  pien-wen, literary form
  Pig
  Pilgrims
  P'ing-ch'eng, city
  Pirates
  Plantation economy
  Plough
  Po Chue-i, poet
  Po-hai, state
  Poetry
    Court Poetry
    Northern Poetry
  Poets (see T'ao Ch'ien, Po Chue-i, Li T'ai-po, Tu Fu, etc.)
  Politicians, migratory
  Pontic migration
  Population changes
    Population decrease
    (see Census, Fertility)
  Porcelain
  Port Arthur, city
  Portsmouth, treaty
  Portuguese (see Fu-lan-chi, Macao)
  Potter
    Pottery
    black pottery
   (see Porcelain)
  Price controls
  Priests (see Shamans, Ju, Monks)
  Primogeniture
  Princes
  Printing (see Colour, Book)
  Privileges of gentry
  Proletariat (see Labour)
  Propaganda
  Property relations (see Laws, Inheritance, Primogeniture)
  Protectorate
  Provinces, administration
  pu-ch'ue, bondsmen
  P'u-ku Huai-en, general
  P'u Sung-lin, writer
  P'u Yi, Manchu ruler
  Puppet plays
        Railways
    Manchurian Railway
  Rebellions (see Peasants, Secret Societies, Revolutions)
  Red Eyebrows, peasant movement
  Red Guards
  Reforms; Reform of language (see Land reform)
  Regents
  Religion
    popular religion
   (see Bon, Shintoism, Persecution, Sacrifice, Ancestor cult,
    Fertility cults, Deities, Temples, Monasteries, Christianity, Islam,
    Buddhism, Mazdaism, Manichaeism, Messianic religions, Secret
    societies, Soul, Shamanism, State religion)
  Republic
  Revolutions; legitimization of revolution (see Rebellions)
  Ricci, Matteo, missionary
  Rice
  Rifles
  Ritualism
  Roads
  Roman Empire
  Roosevelt, F.D., president
  Russia (see Soviet Republics)
  Ryukyu (Liu-ch'iu), islands
        Sacrifices
  Sages
  Sakhalin (Karafuto), island
  Salar, ethnic group
  Salary
  Salt
    Salt merchants
    Salt trade
  Samarkand, city
  San-min chu-i, book
  Sang Hung-yang, economist
  Sassanids, Iranian dynasty
  Scholars (Ju) (see Literati, Scribes, Intellectuals,
    Confucianists)
  Schools, (see Education)
  Science, (see Mathematics, Astronomy, Nature)
  Scribes
  Script, Chinese
  Sculpture
    Buddhist sculptures
  se-mu (auxiliary troops)
  Seal, imperial
  Secret societies (see Red Eyebrows; Yellow Turbans; White Lotus;
    Boxer; Rebellions)
  Sects
    Buddhist sects
  Seng-ko-lin-ch'in, general
  Serfs (see Slaves, Servants, Bondsmen)
  Servants
  Settlement, of foreigners
    military
    (see Colonization)
  Sha-t'o, tribal federation
  Shadow theatre
  Shahruk, ruler
  Shamans
    Shamanism
  Shan tribes of South East Asia
  Shan-hai-ching, book
  Shan-yue, title of nomadic ruler
  Shang dynasty
  Shang Ti, deity
  Shang Tz[)u], philosopher (Shang Yang)
  Shanghai, city
  Shao Yung, philosopher
  Sheep
  Shen Nung, mythical figure
  Shen Tsung, Sung ruler
    Manchu ruler
  Sheng Tsu, Manchu ruler
  Shih-chi, book
  Shih Ching-t'ang, ruler
  Shih Ch'ung, writer
  Shih Heng, soldier
  Shih Hu, ruler
  Shih Huang-ti, ruler
  Shih Lo, ruler
  Shih-pi, ruler
  Shih Ss[)u]-ming
  Shih Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Shih-wei, Mongol tribes
  Shintoism, Japanese religion
  Ships (see Navy)
  Short stories
  Shoulder axes
  Shu (Szechwan), area and/or state
  Shu-Han dynasty
  Shun, dynasty
    mythical ruler
  Shun-chih, reign period
  Sian (Hsi-an, Ch'ang-an), city
  Siao Ho (Hsiao Ho), jurist
  Silk
    Silk road
  Silver
  Sin-lo (Hsin-lo, Silla), state of Korea
  Sinanthropos
  Sinkiang (Hsin-Chiang, Turkestan)
  Slash and burn agriculture (denshiring)
  Slaves
    Slave society
    Temple slaves
  Social mobility
    Social structure of tribes
  Socialism (see Marxism, Communism)
  Sogdiana, country in Central Asia
  Soul, concept of soul
  South-East Asia (see Burma, Champa, Cambodia, Annam, Laos,
    Vietnam, Tonking, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, Mon-Khmer)
  Soviet Republics (see Russia)
  Speculations, financial
  Ss[)u]-ma, clan
  Ss[)u]-ma Ch'ien, historian
  Ss[)u]-ma Kuang, historian
  Ss[)u]-ma Yen, ruler
  Standardization
  States, territorial and national
    State religion
  Statistics (see Population)
  Steel
  Steppe
  Stone age
  Stratification, social (see Classes, Social mobility)
  Strikes
  Students
  Su Chuen, rebel
  Su Tsung, T'ang ruler
  Su Tung-p'o, poet
  su-wang (uncrowned king)
  Sui, dynasty
  Sun Ts'e, ruler
  Sun Yat-sen (Sun I-hsien), revolutionary leader, president
  Sung, dynasty
    Liu-Sung dynasty
  Szechwan (Ss[)u]-ch'uan), province (see Shu)
        Ta-tan (Tatars), tribal federation
  Tada, Japanese militarist
  Tai, tribes (see Thailand)
  Tai Chen, philosopher
  Tai Ch'ing dynasty (Manchu)
  T'ai P'ing, state
  T'ai Tsu, Sung ruler
    Manchu ruler
  T'ai Tsung, T'ang ruler (see Li Shih-min)
  Taiwan (T'ai-wan, see Formosa)
  T'an-yao, priest
  Tanaka, Japanese militarist
  T'ang, dynasty
    Later T'ang dynasty
  T'ang Hsien-tsu, writer
  T'ang Yin, painter
  Tanguts, Tibetan tribal federation and/or state (see Ch'iang)
  Tao, philosophical term
  Tao-kuang, reign period
  Tao-te-ching, book
  T'ao-t'ieh, mythical emblem
  Tao-yen, monk
  Taoism, religion
    Taoists
    (see Lao Tz[)u], Chuang Tz[)u], Chang Ling, etc.)
  Tarim basin
  Tatars (Ta-tan) Mongolian tribal federation
  Taxation
    Tax collectors
    Tax evasion
    Tax exemptions
    Taxes for monks
    Tax reform
  Te Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Tea
    Tea trade
    Tea house (see Brothel)
  Teachers (see Schools)
  Technology
  Tell, archaeological term
  Temples (see Monasteries)
  Tengri khan, ruler
  Textile industry (see Silk, Cotton)
  Thailand, state (see Tai tribes)
  Theatre (see Shadow, Puppet, Opera)
  Throne, accession to (see Abdication, Legitimacy)
  Ti, Tibetan tribes
  Tibet (see Ch'iang, Ti, T'u-fan, T'u-yue-hun, Lhasa Tanguts)
  T'ien, deity
  Tientsin (T'ien-chin), city
  Timur, ruler
  Tin
  Ting-ling, tribal federation
  T'o-pa (see Toba)
  T'o-t'o, writer
  Toba, Turkish tribal federation
  Tocharians, Central Asian ethnic group
  Tokto (see T'o-t'o)
  Toeloes, Turkish tribal group
  Tombs
  Tonking, state
  Tortoise
  Totalitarianism (see Dictatorship, Fascism, Communism)
  Tou Ku, general
  T'ou-man, ruler
  Towns (see City)
  Trade
    barter trade
    international trade
    (see Merchants, Commerce, Caravans, Silk road)
  Translations
  Transportation (see Roads, Canals, Ships, Post, Caravans, Horses)
  Travels of emperors
  Treasury
  Treaty, international
  Tribal organization (see Banner, Army, Nomads)
  Tribes, disappearance of
    social organization
    military organization
  Tribute (kung)
  tsa-hu, social class
  Tsai T'ien, prince
  Ts'ai Yuean-p'ei, scholar
  Ts'ao Chih, poet
  Ts'ao Hsueeh-ch'in, writer
  Ts'ao K'un, politician
  Ts'ao P'ei, ruler
  Ts'ao Ts'ao, general
  Tsewang Rabdan, general
  Tseng Kuo-fan, general
  Tso Tsung-t'ang, general
  Tsou Yen, philosopher
  Ts'ui, clan
  T'u-chueeh, Goek Turk tribes (see Turks)
  Tu Fu, poet
  T'u-fan, Tibetan tribal group
  Tu-ku, Turkish tribe
  T'u-shu chi-ch'eng, encyclopaedia
  tu-tu, title
  T'u-yue-hun, Tibetan tribal federation
  Tuan Ch'i-jui, president
  Tuemet, Mongol tribal group
  Tung Ch'i-ch'ang, painter
  T'ung-chien kang-mu, historical encyclopaedia
  T'ung-chih, reign period
  Tung Chung-shu, thinker
  Tung Fu-hsiang, politician
  Tung-lin academy
  Tungus tribes (see Juchen, Po-hai, Manchu)
  Tunhuang (Tun-huang), city
  Turfan, city state
  Turgut, Mongol tribal federation
  Turkestan (see Central Asia, Tarim, Turfan, Sinkiang, Ferghana,
    Samarkand, Khotcho, Tocharians, Yueeh-chih, Sogdians, etc.)
  Turkey
  Turks (see Goek Turks, T'u-chueeh, Toba, Toeloes, Ting-ling, Uighur,
    Sha-t'o, etc.)
  Tz[)u] Hsi, empress
        Uighurs, Turkish federation
  United States (see America)
  Ungern-Sternberg, general
  Urbanization (see City)
  Urga, city
  University
  Usury
        Vagrants (liu-min)
  Vietnam (see Annam)
  Village
    Village commons
  Vinaya Buddhism
  Voltaire, writer
        Walls
    Great Wall
  Wan-li, reign period
  Wang (king)
  Wang An-shih, statesman
  Wang Chen, eunuch
  Wang Ching-wei, collaborator
  Wang Ch'ung, philosopher
  Wang Hsien-chih, peasant leader
  Wang Kung, general
  Wang Mang, ruler
  Wang Shih-chen, writer
  Wang Shih-fu, writer
  Wang Tao-k'un, writer
  Wang Tun, rebel
  Wang Yang-ming, general and philosopher
  War
    size of wars
    War-chariot
    cost of wars
    War lords
    Warrior-nomads
    (see Army, World War, Opium War, Lorcha War, Fire-arms)
  Washington, conference
  Wei, dynasty
    small state
    empress
  Wei Chung-hsien, eunuch
  Wei T'o, ruler in South China
  Welfare state
  Well-field system (ching-t'ien),
  Wen Ti, Han ruler
    Wei ruler
    Toba ruler
    Sui ruler
  Wen Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Whampoa, military academy
  Wheat
  White Lotus sect (Pai-lien)
  Wholesalers
  Wine
  Wood-cut (see Colour print)
  Wool (see Felt)
  World Wars
  Women rights
  Writing, invention (see Script)
  Wu, empress
    state
  Wuch'ang, city (see Hankow)
  Wu Ching-tz[)u], writer
  Wu-huan, tribal federation
  Wu P'ei-fu, war lord
  Wu San-kui, general
  Wu Shih-fan, ruler
  Wu-sun, tribal group
  Wu Tai (Five Dynasties period)
  Wu Tao-tz[)u], painter
  Wu (Ti), Han ruler
    Chin ruler
    Liang ruler
  Wu Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Wu Wang, Chou ruler
  wu-wei, philosophical term
        Yakub beg, ruler
  Yamato, part of Japan
  Yang, clan
  Yang Chien, ruler (see Wen Ti)
  Yang (Kui-fei), concubine
  Yang-shao, archaeological site
  Yang Ti, Sui ruler
  Yao, mythical ruler
    tribes in South China
  Yarkand, city in Turkestan
  Yeh (K'ai-feng), city
  Yeh-ta (see Ephtalites)
  Yehe-Nara, tribe
  Yellow Turbans, secret society
  Yeh-lue Ch'u-ts'ai, politician
  Yen, state
    dynasty
    Earlier Yen dynasty
    Later Yen dynasty
    Western Yen dynasty
  Yen-an, city
  Yen Fu, translator
  Yen Hsi-shan, war lord
  Yen-ta (Altan), ruler
  Yen-t'ieh-lun (Discourses on Salt and Iron), book
  Yin Chung-k'an, general
  Yin-ch'ue, city
  Yin and Yang, philosophical terms
  Ying Tsung, Manchu ruler
  Yo Fei, general
  Yue Liang, general
  Yue-wen, tribal group
  Yuean Chen
  Yuean Chi, philosopher
  Yuean Mei, writer
  Yuean Shao, general
  Yuean Shih-k'ai, general and president
  Yuean Ti, Han ruler
    Chin ruler
  Yueeh, tribal group and area
  Yueeh-chih, Indo-European-speaking ethnic group
  Yuen-kang, caves
  Yuennan (Yuen-nan), province
  Yung-cheng, reign period
  Yung-lo, reign period
        Zen Buddhism (see Ch'an)
  Zoroaster, founder of religion