FEDERAL EDITION

Limited to 1000 signed and numbered sets.

The Connoisseur’s Federal Edition of the Writings of Thomas Jefferson is limited to four hundred signed and numbered sets, of which this is

Number_________________

We guarantee that no limited, numbered edition, other than the Federal, shall be printed from these plates.

The written number must correspond with the perforated number at the top of this page.

lf0054_figure_001.jpg
The Works of Thomas Jefferson
in Twelve Volumes
Federal Edition
The Works of Thomas Jefferson
Collected and Edited by Paul Leicester Ford
Volume X
G. P. Putnam’s Sons
New York and London The Knickerbocker Press
1905

The Knickerbocker Press, New York

CONTENTS OF VOLUME X

  • 1803
  • Drafts of an Amendment to the Constitution, July . . . . . . . . . page 3
  • To Horatio Gates, July 11th . . . . . 12
  • Cession of Louisiana—Monroe vs. Livingston—Federalist policy—Territory acquired.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, July 12th . 15
  • Citizen law—Republicanization of banks.
  • To the Special Commissioner on Spanish Boundary, July 15th . . . . . . . . 16
  • Land titles—Boundaries.
  • Queries as to Louisiana, July 15th [?] . . . 17
  • To William Duane, July 24th . . . . . 20
  • Ward committee address on removals—Committee’s New Haven reply—Offices in Pennsylvania—State removals.
  • To the Secretary of State, July 31st . . . 27
  • Impressment—Governor of Louisiana.
  • To John Dickinson, August 9th . . . . 28
  • Cession of Louisiana—Boundaries—Constitutional difficulty—Payment.
  • To the Secretary of State, September 14th . . 30
  • Spanish policy.
  • To Doctor Benjamin Rush, October 4th . . . 31
  • Public mourning, etc.—European conflict.
  • Third Annual Message, October 17th . . . 33
  • Special Message on Louisiana, October 21st . . 44
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, October 29th . 45
  • Plans concerning Louisiana.
  • Rules of Etiquette, November [?] . . . . 47
  • To the United States Minister to France, November 4th . . . . . . . . 48
  • Marriage of Jerome Bonaparte—Patterson family—Louisiana treaty—Pichon’s proposal—Taking possession of New Orleans.
  • To John Breckenridge, November 24th . . . 51
  • Constitution for Louisiana—Abuse.
  • To John Randolph, December 1st . . . . 53
  • Relations with Congress and with sons-in-law.
  • To De Witt Clinton, December 2d . . . . 54
  • New York politics — Proceedings of Congress — Louisiana.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, December 13th 56
  • Bank law—Deadly influence of Bank of United States.
  • 1804
  • To the Special Envoy, January 8th . . . . 59
  • Private matters—European friends—Taking possession of Louisiana—Federalist opposition—Offer of governorship of Louisiana—Boundaries—Return of Pinckney—“Small news”—The message—Precedence—France and England.
  • To Thomas McKean, January 17th . . . . 68
  • Amendment of Constitution—Re-election as a vindication—Government for Louisiana.
  • To Dr. Joseph Priestley, January 29th . . . 69
  • Letters—Morals of Jesus—Louisiana—Malthus.
  • To Cæsar A. Rodney, February 24th . . . 72
  • Retirement of Rodney.
  • To Elbridge Gerry, March 3d . . . . . 73
  • Political changes.
  • To Col. Thomas Newton, March 5th . . . 74
  • Fire at Norfolk and contribution.
  • To the Postmaster-General, April 16th . . . 74
  • Eastern Federal scheme of coalition.
  • To the Secretary of State, April 23d . . . 76
  • Course of Great Britain—Death of daughter.
  • To the Secretary of the Navy, April 27th . . 77
  • Morris—Conduct of ministers on loss of frigate Philadelphia.
  • To General John Armstrong, May 26th . . . 79
  • Offer of French mission.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, May 30th . 81
  • Removals—Publication of reasons.
  • To Thomas Leiper, June 11th . . . . . 82
  • Alleged remark of Jefferson concerning political society
  • To Mrs. John Adams, June 13th . . . . 84
  • Thanks for sympathy—Friendship with John Adams—Midnight appointments.
  • To the Secretary of State, July 5th . . . 87
  • Cabinet decision as to Louisiana boundaries.
  • To the Secretary of State, July 14th . . 91
  • Louisiana Convention.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 7th . . . 92
  • Conduct of commissioners at Paris.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 15th . . 94
  • Monroe’s version of European schemes—Neutrality.
  • To John Page, August 16th . . . . . 96
  • Yellow-fever parties—Jefferson’s conclusions.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, August 23d . 97
  • Louisiana appointments.
  • To the Secretary of the Navy, August 28th . . 97
  • Attack of Truxton—Federalists in office.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, September 1st 99
  • Louisiana appointments—Coercion of Foreign Powers to secure neutrality.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, September 8th 100
  • Maritime aggressions near coast.
  • To the Spanish Minister, September 15th . . 102
  • Relations with Spain—Invitation.
  • To the Attorney-General, September 16th . . 103
  • Aggressions of British ships.
  • To De Witt Clinton, October 6th . . . . 104
  • Aristides pamphlet.
  • Fourth Annual Message, November 8th . . . 105
  • To the Secretary of State, November 18th . . 118
  • Admiralty cases—Scott’s decision.
  • To John Randolph, November 19th . . . . 118
  • Bill to protect harbors.
  • To Larkin Smith, November 26th . . . . 122
  • Reply to complaint—Patronage.
  • To Wilson Cary Nicholas, December 6th . . 123
  • Virginia parties—Navy yards.
  • 1805
  • To John Taylor, January 6th . . . . . 124
  • Term of presidency—Voluntary retirement.
  • To William A. Burwell, January 28th . . . 126
  • Perpetuation of slavery—Possibility of emancipation.
  • Second Inaugural Address, March 4th . . . 127
  • To Wilson Cary Nicholas, March 26th . . . 137
  • Appointment—Republican divisions.
  • To the Secretary of State, April . . . . 138
  • Designs of Great Britain—Louisiana boundaries.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, April 3d . . 139
  • Temporary loan—Louisiana boundary.
  • To the United States Minister to Spain, April 27th 140
  • Regret over not meeting—Relations with Spain.
  • To Dr. George Logan, May 11th . . . . 141
  • Poem on slavery—Necessity for guarded conduct—Schism in Pennsylvania—War with Federalism.
  • To James Sullivan, May 21st . . . . . 144
  • Massachusetts politics—Political abuse—Attitude toward Sullivan.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, May 29th . . 146
  • Act concerning New Orleans—Public finances—Orleans revenue—Map of Indians.
  • To John Daly Burke, June 1st . . . . . 147
  • Laws of Virginia—Virginia newspapers.
  • To Thomas Paine, June 5th . . . . . 150
  • Farm of Thomas Paine—Open air room—France and St. Domingo—Newspaper paragraphs—European news.
  • Notes on Armed Vessels, July 4th . . . . 152
  • Notes on Jefferson’s Conduct during the Invasion of Virginia, August . . . . . . 154
  • To the Secretary of State, August 4th . . . 168
  • Mrs. Madison—Spanish affairs—Proposed treaty with Great Britain—Black convicts.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, August 7th . 170
  • Termination of Spanish negotiation—Future course.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 25th . . 170
  • Letter from Turreau—Treachery of France and necessity of friendship with Great Britain—Need of rain.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 27th . . 172
  • Bonaparte’s orders—Treaty with Great Britain—Private affairs.
  • To the Secretary of State, September 16th . . 174
  • Boundaries of Louisiana—Action of France—Alliance with Great Britain—Private news—Pinckney’s return.
  • To the Secretary of State, October 11th . . 176
  • Alliance with Great Britain—Dismissal of Spanish agents—Instruction of Bowdoin—Insurance companies.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, October 23d . 178
  • European war—Time for negotiation with France and Spain.
  • To Wilson Cary Nicholas, October 25th . . 179
  • European war—Great Britain’s encroachments on neutrals.
  • Cabinet Decision on Spain, November 14th . . 180
  • Draft of Fifth Annual Message, December 3d . 181
  • Confidential Message on Spain, December 6th . 198
  • To J. P. Reibelt, December 21st . . . . 205
  • Private correspondence—German emigrants—Merino sheep.
  • A Bill for Establishing a Naval Militia, December 206
  • An Act for Classing the Militia and Assigning to Each Class its Particular Duties . . . 213
  • 1806
  • To Uriah Tracy, January . . . . . . 217
  • Documents concerning nominations.
  • To the Secretary at War, January 6th . . . 219
  • Indian question of law.
  • To William A. Burwell, January 15th . . . 222
  • Parliamentary manual—Spanish news—English relations—Militia.
  • Special Message on Neutral Commerce, January 17th . . . . . . . . . 223
  • To James Ogilvie, January 31st . . . . 225
  • Use of books at Monticello—Classification.
  • To C. F. Comte de Volney, February 11th . . 226
  • Polygraph—Madison’s pamphlet—News of Western expeditions—New animals—Western emigration—Mouldboard.
  • To the Marquis de Lafayette, February 14th . 229
  • Visit to America—Situation at New Orleans—Grant of lands.
  • To the United States Minister to France, February 14th . . . . . . . . 230
  • Storm against Armstrong—St. Domingo—Neutral rights.
  • To Joseph Hamilton Daveiss, February 15th . . 231
  • Reply to news of Burr’s machinations.
  • To Joel Barlow, February 24th . . . . 232
  • National Academy and University—Philosophical Society.
  • Circular to Cabinet on Defence of New Orleans, February 28th . . . . . . . 233
  • To the Secretary of State, March 5th . . . 236
  • Purchase of Florida.
  • To James Monroe, March 18th . . . . 237
  • Nicholson’s resolutions—Randolph’s withdrawal.
  • Special Message on Spanish Boundaries, March 20th . . . . . . . . . 238
  • To William Duane, March 22d . . . . . 240
  • Personal relations and slander—Intercourse with republicans—Randolph—Attitude toward Great Britain—Cabinet discussions—Miranda—Presidential difficulties.
  • To Wilson Cary Nicholas, March 24th . . . 243
  • Friendly settlement with Spain—Offer of appointment on commission.
  • To Cæsar A. Rodney, March 24th . . . . 245
  • Affairs of Louisiana—Randolph’s secession.
  • To Thomas Paine, March 25th . . . . . 246
  • Affairs with Great Britain and Spain—Geographical selection of commissioners—Neutral rights — Declines Paine’s offer of services.
  • To Nathaniel Macon, March 26th . . . . 248
  • Enemies sowing tares—Meeting requested.
  • To the Emperor Alexander of Russia, April 19th 249
  • Respect for Emperor—European events—Power of two men—Position of United States.
  • To John Tyler, April 26th . . . . . 251
  • Appointment of midshipman—Session of Congress—European events—Randolph schism.
  • To William Charles Coles Claiborne, April 27th 253
  • Views on New Orleans—Militia—Spain—Defences—Public road—Lafayette’s grant—Reibelt—Pecan nuts—Councillor.
  • Draft of Proclamation Concerning Leander, May 3d . . . . . . . . . 256
  • To the United States Minister to Great Britain, May 4th . . . . . . . . 259
  • Pinkney—Mercer’s and Randolph’s secession—Republican strength—Monroe’s course—Offer of governorship—Fox—British policy— Leander incident—Claim to Gulf Stream.
  • To Samuel Smith, May 4th . . . . . 264
  • Wilkinson’s appointment—Union of civil and military.
  • To Jacob Crowninshield, May 13th . . . . 265
  • Leander incident—Navy—Proclamation—British negotiation.
  • To the Secretary of State, May 23d . . . 267
  • Return of Armstrong—Letter to Tripoli—Rains.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, June 15th . 269
  • Lafayette’s grant—Harbor police.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, June 19th . 270
  • Supplying of ships of war.
  • To Levi Lincoln, June 25th . . . . . 271
  • Gerry and Heath’s refusal of appointments—Negotiation with Great Britain—Spain and France—Appointment of marshal.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, June 26th . 273
  • Right of citizenship and of expatriation.
  • To Thomas Mann Randolph, July 13th . . . 274
  • Quarrel of T. M. Randolph with John Randolph.
  • To the United States Minister to Spain, July 26th 276
  • Misunderstanding between Bowdoin and Armstrong.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 8th . . . 279
  • Mellimenni—St. Thomas—Spanish fugitive—British fort at Carleton—New York marshal—Personal movements.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, August 15th . 281
  • Trial of Smith and Ogden—Appointments—Drought.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, August 16th . 282
  • Rule of Pardons.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, August 28th . 282
  • Appointments—Florida negotiation—Use of public ships for private advantage.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, August 31st . 284
  • Louisiana commissioners—Western roads.
  • To Joseph Hamilton Daveiss, September 12th . 286
  • Acknowledging letters concerning Burr.
  • To W. A. Burwell, September 17th . . . . 286
  • Decrees—Notes on relations with Spain.
  • To George Morgan, September 19th . . . 291
  • Information of Burr’s movements.
  • To the Secretary of State, September 23d . . 293
  • Reply to Turreau—Use of navy yard—Personal movements.
  • To Albert Gallatin, October 12th . . . . 294
  • Attempt to alienate—Respect.
  • To Meriwether Lewis, October 20th . . . 295
  • Welcome—Indian curiosities.
  • To the United States Minister to Great Britain, October 26th . . . . . . . 296
  • British negotiation—Mathematical instruments—Monroe’s affairs.
  • To Andrew Ellicott, November 1st . . . . 299
  • Eclipse—Appointments and intolerance—Schisms in republicans.
  • Proclamation against Burr’s Plot, November 27th 301
  • Sixth Annual Message, December 2d . . . 302
  • Special Message on Great Britain, December 3d . 320
  • To Cæsar A. Rodney, December 5th . . . 322
  • Burr—Spain—Rule of appointments.
  • To the Secretary of War, December 12th . . 323
  • Military force of United States and defence from Spain.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, December 12th 324
  • Appointments and removals.
  • Proclamation Concerning “Cambrian,” etc., December 20th . . . . . . . . 325
  • To the Governor of Louisiana, December 20th . 327
  • Burr’s plot—Measures to be taken.
  • To Thomas Leiper, December 22d . . . . 329
  • Address—Danger of schism—Burr’s plot.
  • To the Secretary of the Navy, December 23d . 330
  • Burr’s movements—Neutralizing measures.
  • 1807
  • To the Governor of New Orleans, January 3d . 332
  • Burr’s expedition—Blennerhasset’s flotilla—Arrangement on Mississippi—Confidential agents.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, January 4th . 336
  • Burr’s ship at New York.
  • To Rev. Charles Clay, January 11th . . . 338
  • Adjoining land—Spanish affairs—Burr’s schemes.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, January 13th . 339
  • Disapproves of appointing women to office.
  • To John Dickinson, January 13th . . . . 340
  • Discontents in territory of Orleans—Fatigue of office.
  • To William Waller Hening, January 14th . . 342
  • Collection of Virginia laws.
  • To Cæsar A. Rodney, January 17th . . . . 344
  • Nomination of Rodney as Attorney-General.
  • To the Governor of South Carolina, January 20th 345
  • Alston’s concern in Burr’s plottings—Proceedings of Government against Alston.
  • Special Message on Burr, January 22d . . . 346
  • Special Message on Burr, January 28th . . . 356
  • To the Governor of Ohio, February 2d . . . 357
  • Gratitude for the energetic proceedings of State against Burr.
  • Special Message on Gunboats, February 10th . 359
  • To Thomas Seymour, February 11th . . . 366
  • Political oppression in Connecticut—Prosecution in courts—Political falsehoods work their own cure—Opposed to limitations on liberty of the press.
  • To Joseph Hopper Nicholson, February 20th . . 369
  • Evidence against Adair.
  • To Wilson Cary Nicholas, February 28th . . 370
  • Welcomes facts and opinions without reserve—Urges Nicholas’s election to Congress—Present House well disposed, but lacks leaders.
  • To Robert Brent, March 10th . . . . . 371
  • Consideration of act of Congress relating to city of Washington.
  • Circular Letter to the Governors of Kentucky, Tennessee, Ohio, and Mississippi, March 21st 372
  • Condition of western side of the Mississippi—Militia Act in relation to volunteers—Attack on Spanish possessions hinted—Method of organizing troops.
  • To the United States Minister to Great Britain, March 21st . . . . . . . 374
  • Receipt of British treaty—Endeavor of Federal papers to produce personal disagreement with Monroe—Jefferson’s opinion of treaty—Special objection to the eleventh article—Offers Monroe governorship of New Orleans.
  • To the Secretary of War, March 29th . . . 378
  • The position of officers involved in Burr’s expedition—Special case of Mead.
  • To the United States Minister to Spain, April 2d 379
  • Polgyraph—British treaty—Little expectation of English justice—War of commercial restrictions suggested—Injustice and perfidy of Spain—Good faith of the United States shown in capture of Burr — Burr’s trial at Richmond.
  • To the Secretary of State, April 14th . . . 383
  • As to witnesses in Burr’s trial.
  • To William Branch Giles, April 20th . . . 383
  • Tricks of the judges in favor of Burr—Federalists making Burr’s cause their own—Complaints against action of administration—Marshall’s utterances—The people will amend the error in our Constitution—Personal feelings as regards Burr.
  • To the Secretary of State, April 21st . . . 388
  • Responsibility for the conduct of belligerents on American coasts—Passport for Neimcewicz—Foreign seamen on American vessels—Best course in British negotiations.
  • To the Secretary of State, April 25th . . . 390
  • Papers respecting Burr’s case—Disposal of minor actors in Burr’s schemes.
  • To the Secretary of State, May 1st . . . 391
  • French proposition for separating the western country—Burr’s agents in Europe—Nothing to hope from new British administration—Correction in message.
  • To the Secretary of State, May 5th . . . 392
  • “War in Disguise”—Classified militia.
  • To William Short, May 19th . . . . . 393
  • Determination to retire from Presidency—Federalist preference that Jefferson should continue in office—Some men of candor in Federalist party—How far Jefferson carried removal from office—Presidential appointments a horrid drudgery—Never more than one or two personal enemies.
  • To the United States District Attorney for Virginia, May 20th . . . . . . 394
  • Communication of Bollman concerning Burr—Expected arrival of Wilkinson.
  • To De Witt Clinton, May 24th . . . . . 401
  • Thanks for a pamphlet on Jefferson—Dr. Linn’s untruthfulness.
  • To the Marquis de Lafayette, May 26th . . . 406
  • Lafayette’s land in Louisiana—Burr’s conspiracy—Miranda’s expedition—Steadfastness of people—Gifts to Madame de Tessé.
  • To John W. Eppes, May 28th . . . . . 412
  • Family details—Lack of news—First day of Burr’s trial—Original error in making the judiciary independent—Opinion of U. S. marshal.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, June 1st . . 413
  • Tariff on French wines.
  • To William Short, June 12th . . . . . 414
  • Need of an umpire to discordant negotiators at Paris—How far President is controlled by Cabinet—Relations between Jefferson and Short.
  • To John Norvell, June 14th . . . . . 415
  • No good elementary work on the organization of society into civil government—What books to read on government—The best English histories—How a newspaper should be conducted—Commiserates newspaper readers—A man who never looks into a newspaper better informed than he who reads them—Possible reformation in press—He who pays for printing a slander is its real author.
  • To James Sullivan, June 19th . . . . . 420
  • Congratulations over election of Sullivan as governor of Massachusetts—Closer relations between the state and national executives—Advantage of uniformity in state proceedings—Federalists completely vanquished—Proposed northern tour.
  • To Doctor Caspar Wistar, June 21st . . . 423
  • Education of grandson—Outline of desirable studies—Jefferson’s views on medicine—Fashion in medicine—Dry and dreary waste of politics.
  • To the Secretary of War, June 22d . . . 430
  • Outline of a letter for Wilkinson— In re Spanish Complaint of Pike’s conduct.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, June 25th . 432
  • Capture of the Chesapeake frigate—Call for the Cabinet to assemble.
  • To the Governor of Virginia, June 29th . . . 432
  • Chesapeake outrage—In doubt whether it is a cause for war—Approves of conduct of governor.
  • Chesapeake Proclamation, July 2d . . . . 434
  • To the Vice-President of the United States, July 6th . . . . . . . . . 448
  • British outrage at New York—Measures adopted as regards conduct of British ships—Outline of proclamation.
  • To the Secretary at War, July 7th . . . 449
  • Conduct of British commanders in Chesapeake Bay—Blows hourly possible—Desires Secretary’s presence—New York fortifications.
  • To Thomas Cooper, July 9th . . . . . 450
  • Life of Dr. Priestley—Expects republicans to schismatize—Gross English insult—Principles influencing government.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, July 10th . 452
  • Necessity of daily conference—Decision concerning letters of marque.
  • To the United States Minister to Spain, July 10th . 453
  • Despatches—Critical state with Great Britain—Blockade of Norfolk—Country never so excited since Lexington—In this state of things desires peace with France and Spain—Consents to Bowdoin’s return—Regret over disagreement between Bowdoin and Armstrong—Suspension of American commerce.
  • To Barnabas Bidwell, July 11th . . . . 455
  • Atrocious acts of British ships—Principles controlling government—Assurances of British officers.
  • To John W. Eppes, July 12th . . . . . 457
  • Commission to purchase horse—Affection for Francis—The affair of the Chesapeake —British must disavow and give reparation—Slight cost of war—Coast defence.
  • To the Secretary at War, July 13th . . . 459
  • Conduct of British ships at Hampton Roads—Virginia militia—Lack of artillery.
  • To Dupont de Nemours, July 14th . . . . 460
  • How far supplied with cannon and muskets—Exasperation of country—Safety of New York — Burr’s conspiracy—Failure of trial—Mention of books.
  • To the Marquis de Lafayette, July 14th . . 462
  • Health of Madame de Lafayette—Desire to have Lafayette governor of Orleans—Burr’s conspiracy—Bollman’s guilt—Innate force of American government— Chesapeake proclamation—Seeds sent Madame de Tessé.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, July 16th . 466
  • Call for Cabinet council.
  • To the United States Minister to France, July 17th . . . . . . . . . 466
  • Critical situation as regards England—British government called on for reparation and security—Modifications in instructions—Possession of the Floridas.
  • To the Secretary at War, July . . . . 467
  • Action of British vessels in Hampton Roads—Insists on presence of Dearborn—Important decision to be soon taken.
  • To John Page, July 17th . . . . . . 468
  • System of appointments—Pleased with Virginia’s conduct as regards British outrage.
  • To William Duane, July 20th . . . . . 470
  • Activity of government—Preparations for war—Believes war inevitable—The character of Emperor of Russia.
  • To Mr. Edmund Pendleton Gaines, July 23d . . 472
  • Charges against Gaines reviewed.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 9th . . . 474
  • Post riders—Confusion in Chesapeake regarding authority.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 16th . . 476
  • Contempt for Spain—Miranda’s expedition—Reprisals on the Floridas—Imagined events in case of war with Spain.
  • To Robert Fulton, August 16th . . . . 477
  • Torpedoes.
  • To Jonathan Dayton, August 17th . . . . 478
  • Declines to interpose in his favor.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 18th . . 479
  • Erskine’s complaints as to treatment of British ships in Chesapeake—Facts concerning desertions and enlistments.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 20th . . 481
  • News concerning Bonaparte’s victories—Outline of probable events—Alleged action of British in Oanada—British deserters should never be enlisted.
  • To Thomas Leiper, August 21st . . . . 482
  • General Shee and Federal appointments—Success of Bonaparte.
  • To the Secretary of State, August 25th . . 484
  • As regards British men-of-war—Orders concerning those in Chesapeake—Negotiations with Great Britain to be submitted to Congress.
  • To the Secretary at War, August 28th . . . 485
  • Restlessness of Indians — British incitement of Indians—Preparation of militia for Indian war—Conference with Indians.
  • To the Secretary of State, September 1st . . 489
  • Peace with Algiers—Desire for war with Spain—Discontinuance of the daily post—Necessity of living outside of Washington in summer months.
  • To the Secretary of the Navy, September 3d . . 490
  • Warnings to American commerce in Indian Ocean—Piratical vessel—Defence of Chesapeake Bay—Improbability of Great Britain making reparation.
  • To Thomas Paine, September 6th . . . . 492
  • Improvement in gunboat—Progress in European events.
  • To the Secretary of the Navy, September 8th . 494
  • Complaints of Erskine—Advantage of prompt disavowal.
  • To the Secretary of State, September 18th . . 495
  • Action of the navy should British ships assume the offensive—Unpleasant aspect of Indian affairs.
  • To the Secretary of the Navy, September 18th . 496
  • Naval officers not to precipitate hostilities—Crews of British ships not to land or receive supplies.
  • To the Secretary of State, September 20th . . 497
  • No interdiction at mouth of Mississippi—Course regarding the Spanish decree—Question as to ordering out the militia and volunteers—Letter to Erskine—Misbehavior of post rider.
  • To the Governor of New Orleans, September 20th 499
  • Papers concerning the Burr conspiracy—Disgraceful failure of Burr trial—Result a proclamation of impunity to every traitor.
  • To Tench Coxe, September 21st . . . . 500
  • Scheme for equalizing the sea power of nations—Necessity of reducing the “great Monopoliser” of the ocean—Wishes a navigation law.
  • To William Thomson, September 26th . . . 501
  • His view of Burr’s trial—Need of a history of the western country—Alarming scenes at Richmond.
  • To the Attorney-General October 8th . . . 502
  • Congratulates him on new child—Rodney’s presence in Washington important—Digest of documents respecting Burr’s treason—Great Britain’s violations of the maritime law.
  • Seventh Annual Message, October 27th . . 503
  • To the Governor of the Mississippi Territory, November 1st . . . . . . . 527
  • Failure to acknowledge letters—Factional disputes in the territories—Absence of faction in the United States due to great extent of territory.
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, November 22d . 528
  • Defence of Orleans—Draft of Militia Bill.
  • Confidential Message, December 7th . . . 528
  • To Joel Barlow, December 10th . . . . 529
  • Strong desire for peace—Necessity of giving popular assemblies time—Fond hopes of public canals, roads, and education.
  • Special Message on Commercial Depredations, December 18th . . . . . . . 530
  • To the Secretary of the Treasury, December 29th 531
  • Fraudulent maritime use of American flag.

ITINERARY AND CHRONOLOGY OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 1803–1807

1803.—July At Washington.
Frames Louisiana Amendment to the Constitution.
16. Cabinet discuss Louisiana Treaty.
Drafts “Queries” as to Louisiana.
22. At Monticello.
24. Makes informal reply to Ward Committee of Philadelphia.
Appoints Monroe Minister to Great Britain.
Oct. 1. At Washington.
17. Sends Third Annual Message.
20. Louisiana Treaty ratified by Senate.
Nov. ? Frames rules of Public Etiquette.
Drafts bill for government of Louisiana.
4. Sends message on Barbary Powers.
14. Transmits information concerning Louisiana.
30. Transmits additional information concerning Louisiana.
Dec. 5. Sends message on Barbary War.
21. Sends message on Spanish Claims.
24. Replies to Address of Legislature of Tennessee.
1804.—Jan. 8. Offers Monroe governorship of Louisiana.
18. Sends message on taking possession of Louisiana.
26. Called on by Burr.
Feb. 18. Cabinet discussion of Louisiana boundaries.
Approves act organizing Louisiana and Orleans.
Apr. 6. At Monticello.
17. Daughter, Mary Eppes, dies.
1804.—May 1. At Washington.
26. Cabinet settle Tripoline terms.
Offers Armstrong French mission.
Appoints Monroe Minister to Spain.
Aug. 7. At Monticello.
Oct. 6. At Washington.
8. Cabinet discuss Spanish affairs.
Drafts bill for Harbor Protection.
Nov. Re-elected President of United States.
8. Sends Fourth Annual Message.
19. Nominates Bowdoin Minister to Spain.
1805.—Feb. 2. Electoral votes counted by Congress.
Mar. 2. Attorney-General Lincoln resigns.
Robert Smith appointed Attorney-General.
Jacob Crowninshield appointed Secretary of Navy.
3. Approves bill for Harbor Protection.
4. Inaugurated as President.
13. At Monticello.
April 19. At Washington.
July 4. Prepares Notes on Armed Vessels.
8. Cabinet discuss neutral commerce.
20. At Monticello.
Aug. Prepares Notes on Conduct in 1780–1.
Suggests alliance with Great Britain.
Oct. 11. At Washington.
Nov. 12. Cabinet discuss Spanish affairs.
14. Cabinet frame terms for Spain.
19. Cabinet modify Spanish terms.
Dec. 3. Sends Fifth Annual Message.
4. Drafts resolutions on Spain for Congress.
6. Sends confidential message on Spain.
Drafts bill for a naval militia.
Drafts bill classifying militia.
Dec. 20. John Breckenridge nominated Attorney-General.
1806.—Jan. 13. Sends message on Tripoline Affairs.
17. Sends message on Neutral Commerce.
Feb. 6. Sends confidential message on Great Britain.
8. Drafts resolutions concerning Spain.
Warned by Daveiss of Burr’s plot.
19. Sends message on Western Exploration.
24. Aids Barlow to draft bill for a National University.
Drafts bill for settling Orleans territory.
28. Nominates Bowdoin and Armstrong joint commissioners to Spain.
1806.—Mar. 14. Pinkney selected by Cabinet for English mission.
15? Has interview with Burr.
20. Sends special message on Spanish Boundaries.
24. Offers Cary commissionership to Spain.
Sends confidential message on Great Britain.
25. Cabinet decision on Spanish affairs.
Apr. 19. Writes letter to Alexander of Russia.
Nominates Monroe and Pinkney joint commissioners to Great Britain.
May 1. Cabinet discuss Leander incident.
3. Issues Leander proclamation.
10. At Monticello.
June 7. At Washington.
July 26. At Monticello.
Oct. 4. At Washington.
22. Cabinet discuss Burr plot.
25. Cabinet decision on Burr.
Nov. 8. Orders to Wilkinson, in re Burr.
27. Issues proclamation against Burr.
Dec. 2. Sends Sixth Annual Message.
3. Sends special message on Great Britain.
15. Message on distressed French prepared, but not sent.
20. Issues proclamation against Cambrian.
1807.—Jan. 1. Elected President of American Philosophical Society.
6. Burr expedition leaves Chickasaw Bluffs.
7. Great Britain adopts Orders in Council.
14. Aids Hening in preparation of Virginia statutes.
16. Randolph resolution in re Burr adopted.
17. Burr surrenders to Meade.
20. Appoints Rodney Attorney-General.
22. Sends message on Burr.
23. Senate passes bill to suspend Habeas Corpus.
26. House rejects bill to suspend Habeas Corpus.
28. Sends additional message on Burr.
31. Sends message on Cumberland Road.
Drafts amendment to Volunteer Bill.
Feb. 2. Cabinet council on British negotiations.
3. Notifies British negotiators of disapproval of treaty.
10. Sends message on Gunboats.
14. Sends reply to Massachusetts address.
19. Spain issues commercial decree.
28. Writes to King of Holland.
1807.—Feb. 28. Burr arrested.
Mar. 2. Signs bill to end slave trade.
3. British Treaty arrives.
21. Sends circular letter to State governors.
30. Burr trial begins.
Apr. 1. Burr released on bail.
Leaves Washington.
Arrives at Monticello.
May 13. Leaves Monticello.
17. Arrives at Washington.
19. Writes Short of his intention to refuse renomination.
20. Sends new instruction to English negotiators.
29. Receives French medal for design of mould-board.
June 1. Frames tariff on French wines.
13. Subpœnaed to attend Burr trial.
22. Chesapeake frigate captured.
July 2. Issues proclamation against British war-ships.
4. Cabinet agrees to call Congress.
Aug. 1. Leaves Washington.
5. Arrives at Monticello.
Sept. 1. Proposes to seize the Floridas.
Burr acquitted.
9. Leaves Monticello for Bedford.
17. Arrives at Monticello.
30. Leaves Monticello.
Oct. 3. Arrives at Washington.
27. Sends Seventh Annual Message.
30. Burr trial ends.
Nov. 11. Great Britain extends Orders in Council.
13. Sends reply to Society of Friends.
18. Sends reply to Baptists.
23. Sends message on Burr Trial.
Dec. 7. Sends confidential message on Great Britain.
10. Sends reply to Assembly of Vermont.
Sends reply to Legislature of New Jersey.
14. Sends reply to Washington Society of Tammany
Non-importation Act goes into effect.
17. France issues supplementary decree concerning neutral commerce.
18. Sends message on Commercial Depredations.
21. Sends reply to Baptist Association.
22. Embargo Act signed.

CORRESPONDENCE AND OFFICIAL PAPERS
1803–1807

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July, 1803
Gallatin
Gallatin

DRAFTS OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION. 1

j. mss.

The province of Louisiana is incorporated with the U. S. and made part thereof. The rights of occupancy in the soil, and of self government, are confirmed to the Indian inhabitants, as they now exist. Pre-emption only of the portions rightfully occupied by them, a succession to the occupancy of such as they may abandon, with the full rights of possession as well as of property sovereignty in whatever is not or shall cease to be so rightfully occupied by them shall belong to the U. S.

The legislature of the Union shall have authority to exchange the right of occupancy in portions where the U. S. have full right for lands possessed by Indians within the U. S. on the East side of the Missisipi: to exchange lands on the East side of the river for those of the white inhabitants on the West side thereof and above the latitude of 31 degrees: to maintain in any part of the province such military posts as may be requisite for peace or safety: to exercise police over all persons therein, not being Indian inhabitants: to work salt springs, or mines of coal, metals and other minerals within the possession of the U. S. or in any others with the consent of the possessors; to regulate trade intercourse between the Indian inhabitants and all other persons; to explore and ascertain the geography of the province, its productions and other interesting circumstances; to open roads and navigation therein where necessary for beneficial communication; to establish agencies and factories therein for the cultivation of commerce, peace good understanding with the Indians residing there.

The legislature shall have no authority to dispose of the lands of the province otherwise than as hereinbefore permitted, until a new Amendment of the constitution shall give that authority. Except as to that portion thereof which lies South of the latitude of 31 degrees; which whenever they deem expedient, they may erect into a territorial Government, either separate or as making part with one on the eastern side of the river, vesting the inhabitants thereof with all the rights possessed by other territorial citizens of the U. S. 1

Louisiana, as ceded by France to the U S. is made a part of the U S. Its white inhabitants shall be citizens, and stand, as to their rights obligations, on the same footing with other citizens of the U S. in analogous situations. Save only that as to the portion thereof lying North of an East West line drawn through the mouth of Arkansa river, no new State shall be established, nor any grants of land made, other than to Indians in exchange for equivalent portions of land occupied by them, until authorised by further subsequent amendment to the Constitution shall be made for these purposes.

Florida also, whenever it may be rightfully obtained, shall become a part of the U S. Its white inhabitants shall thereupon be Citizens shall stand, as to their rights obligations, on the same footing with other citizens of the U S. in analogous situations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 11, ’03
Washington
Horatio Gates
Gates, Horatio

TO HORATIO GATES 2

Dear General,

—I accept with pleasure, and with pleasure reciprocate your congratulations on the acquisition of Louisiana: for it is a subject of mutual congratulations as it interests every man of the nation. The territory acquired, as it includes all the waters of the Missouri Mississippi, has more than doubled the area of the U. S. and the new part is not inferior to the old in soil, climate, productions important communications. If our legislature dispose of it with the wisdom we have a right to expect, they may make it the means of tempting all our Indians on the East side of the Mississippi to remove to the West, and of condensing instead of scattering our population. I find our opposition is very willing to pluck feathers from Monroe, although not fond of sticking them into Livingston’s coat. The truth is both have a just portion of merit and were it necessary or proper it could be shewn that each has rendered peculiar service, of important value. These grumblers too are very uneasy lest the administration should share some little credit for the acquisition, the whole of which they ascribe to the accident of war. They would be cruelly mortified could they see our files from April 1801, the first organization of the administration, but more especially from April 1802. They would see that tho’ we could not say when war would arise, yet we said with energy what would take place when it should arise. We did not, by our intrigues, produce the war: but we availed ourselves of it when it happened. The other party saw the case now existing on which our representations were predicted, and the wisdom of timely sacrifice. But when these people make the war give us everything, they authorize us to ask what the war gave us in their day? They had a war. What did they make it bring us? Instead of making our neutrality the grounds of gain to their country, they were for plunging into the war. And if they were now in place, they would not be at war against the Alliests disorganizers of France. They were for making their country an appendage to England. We are friendly, cordially and conscientiously friendly to England, but we are not hostile to France. We will be rigorously just and sincerely friendly to both. I do not believe we shall have as much to swallow from them as our predecessors had.

With respect to the territory acquired, I do not think it will be a separate government as you imagine. I presume the island of N. Orleans and the settled country on the opposite bank, will be annexed to the Mississippi territory. We shall certainly endeavor to introduce the American laws there that cannot be done but by amalgamating the people with such a body of Americans as may take the lead in legislation government. Of course they will be under the Governor of Mississippi. The rest of the territory will probably be locked up from American settlement, and under the self-government of the native occupants.

You know that every sentence from me is put on the rack by our opponents, to be tortured into something they can make use of. No caution therefore I am sure is necessary against letting my letter go out of your hands. I am always happy to hear from you, and to know that you preserve your health. Present me respectfully to Mrs. Gates, and accept yourself my affectionate salutations and assurances of great respect esteem.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 15, 1803
Albert Gallatin
Gallatin, Albert

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY (ALBERT GALLATIN.)

j. mss.

It is difficult to see what Mr. Bond would be at. I suppose he aims at our citizen laws. There is a distinction which we ought to make ourselves, and with which the belligerent powers ought to be content. Where, after the commencement of a war, a merchant of either comes here and is naturalized, the purpose is probably fraudulent against the other, and intended to cloak their commerce under our flag. This we should honestly discountenance, and never reclaim their property when captured. But merchants from either, settled and made citizens before a war, are citizens to every purpose of commerce, and not to be distinguished in our proceedings from natives. Every attempt of Great Britain to enforce her principle of “once a subject and always a subject” beyond the case of her own subjects ought to be repelled. A copy of General Muhlenberg’s letter, stating the fact of citizenship accurately, ought to satisfy Mr. Bond, unless he can disprove the fact: or unless, admitting the fact, he at once attacks our principle: on that ground we will meet his government.

As to the patronage of the Republican Bank at Providence, I am decidedly in favor of making all the banks Republican, by sharing deposits among them in proportion to the dispositions they show; if the law now forbids it, we should not permit another session of Congress to pass without amending it. It is material to the safety of Republicanism to detach the mercantile interests from its enemies and incorporate them into the body of its friends. A merchant is naturally a Republican, and can be otherwise only from a vitiated state of things. Affectionate salutations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 15, 1803
Washington
Ephraim Kirby
Kirby, Ephraim

TO THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER ON SPANISH BOUNDARY (EPHRAIM KIRBY.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I yesterday signed a commission appointing you one of the commissioners to receive determine the titles of lands held on the East side of Pearl river. The place of sessions will be Fort Stoddart. I am happy in having in that commission the name of a person already so well known to the public as to ensure their confidence. The other commissioner will be Mr. Robert Carter Nicholas of Kentucky, son of the late George Nicholas of that state. I am desirous of appointing to the register’s office, some worthy inhabitant of that part of the country, but I have never been able to get a recommendation of anyone. He should be of perfect integrity, good understanding, and, if a lawyer, so much the better. Under these circumstances I have thought it best to ask you to take charge of a blank commission, to be filled up by yourself as soon after your arrival there, as you can acquire information of the best character. Your own judgment will suggest to you the advantage of keeping it entirely secret that you have such a power, in order that you may obtain disinterested information. But I am obliged to impose on you another task, quite out of the line of your official duty, yet within that of a citizen of the U. S. We have had no means of acquiring any knolege of the number, nature extent of our settlements west of Pearl river: Yet it is extremely important that we should receive accurate information. I have therefore taken the liberty of stating some queries to which I will pray your attention, and that you will take all the pains you can to obtain for me full and faithful answers. 1 I leave this place within a few days for Monticello to remain there through the months of August and September. I pray you to accept my friendly salutations assurances of great esteem respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 15 1803
William Dunbar
Dunbar, William

QUERIES AS TO LOUISIANA

j. mss.

1. What are the boundaries of Louisiana, and on what authority does each portion of them rest?

2. What is the distance from New Orleans to the nearest point of the western boundary?

3. Into what divisions is the province laid off?

4. What officers civil or military are appointed to each division, and what to the general government with a definition of their powers?

5. What emoluments have they, and from what source derived?

6. What are the annual expenses of the province drawn from the Treasury?

7. What are the nett receipts of the Treasury, from what taxes or other resources are they drawn?

8. On what footing is the church clergy, what lands have they and from what other funds are they supported?

9. What is the population of the province distinguishing between white and black, but excluding Indians, on the East side of the Mississippi? Of the settlement on the west side next the mouth? Of each district settlement in the other parts of the province? And what the geographical position and extent of each of these settlements?

10. What are the foundations of their land titles? And what their tenure?

11. What is the quantity of granted lands as near as can be estimated?

12. What is the quantity ungranted in the Island of New Orleans, and in the settlement adjacent on the west side?

13. What are the lands appropriated to the public use?

14. What buildings, fortifications, or other fixed property belong to the public?

15. What is the quantity general limits of the lands fit for the culture of sugar? What proportion is granted what ungranted?

16. Whence is their code of laws derived? A copy of it, if in print.

17. What are the best maps, general or particular, of the whole or parts of the province? Copies of them if to be had in print. 1

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 24, 1803
Monticello
William Duane
Duane, William

TO WILLIAM DUANE

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—The address of the Ward committee of Philada on the subject of removals from office was received at Washington on the 17th inst. I cannot answer it, because I have given no answers to the many others I have received from other quarters. Your are sensible what use an unfriendly party would make of such answers by putting all their expressions to the torture; and altho’ no person wishes more than I do to learn the opinions of respected individuals, because they enable me to examine, and often to correct my own, yet I am not satisfied that I ought to admit the addresses even of those bodies of men which are organized by the Constitution (the houses of legislature for instance), to influence the appointment to office for which the Constitution has chosen to rely on the independence and integrity of the Executive, controlled by the Senate, chosen both of them by the whole union. Still less of those bodies whose organization is unknown to the Constitution. As revolutionary instruments (when nothing but revolution will cure the evils of the state) they are necessary and indispensable, and the right to use them is inalienable by the people; but to admit them as ordinary habitual instruments as a part of the machinery of the Constitution, would be to change that machinery by introducing moving powers foreign to it, and to an extent depending solely on local views, and therefore incalculable. The opinions offered by individuals, and of right, are on a different ground; they are sanctioned by the constitution; which has also prescribed, when they chuse to act in bodies, the organization, objects rights of those bodies. Altho’ this view of the subject forbids me, in my own judgment, to give answers to addresses of this kind, yet the one now under consideration is couched in terms so friendly and respectful, and from persons, many of whom I know to have been firm patriots, some of them in revolutionary times and others in those of terror, doubt not that all are of the same valuable character, that I cannot restrain the desire they should individually understand the reasons why no formal answer is given: That they should see it proceeds from my view of the constitution and the judgment I form of my duties to it, and not from a want of respect esteem for them, or their opinions, which given individually will ever be valued by me. I beg leave therefore to avail myself of my acquaintance with you, of your friendly dispositions to communicate to them individually the considerations expressed in this letter, which is merely private and to yourself, and which I ask you not to put out of your own hands lest directly or by copy it should get into those of the common adversary, and become matter for those malignant perversions which no sentiments however just, no expressions however correct can escape.

It may perhaps at first view be thought that my answer to the Newhaven letter was not within my own rule. But that letter was expressed to be from the writers individually, not as an organized body chosen to represent and express the public opinion. The occasion too which it furnished had for some time been wished for, of explaining to the republican part of the nation my sense of their just rights to participation to office, and the proceedings adopted for attaining it after due inquiry into the general sentiment of the several states. The purpose there explained was to remove some of the least deserving officers, but generally to prefer the milder measure of waiting till accidental vacancies should furnish opportunity of giving to republicans their due proportion of office. To this we have steadily adhered. Many vacancies have been made by death and resignation, many by removal for malversation in office and for open, active and virulent abuse of official influence in opposition to the order of things established by the will of the nation. Such removals continue to be made on sufficient proof. The places have been steadily filled with republican characters until of 316 offices in all the U. S. subject to appointment and removal by me, 130 only are held by federalists. I do not include in this estimate the judiciary military because not removable but by established process, nor the officers of the Internal revenue because discontinued by law, nor postmasters or any others not named by me. And this has been effected in little more than two years by means so moderate and just as cannot fail to be approved in future. Whether a participation of office in proportion to numbers should be effected in each state separately or in the whole states taken together is difficult to decide, and has not yet been settled in my own mind. It is a question of vast complications. But suppose we were to apply the rule of Pennsylvania distinctly from the Union. In the state of Pennsylvania 8 offices only are subject to my nomination and informal removal. Of these 5 are in the hands of republicans, 3 of federalists, to wit

Republican. Federal.
The attorney Dallas Naval officer
Marshal Smith Surveyor
Collector Muhlenberg Commisr of Loans
Purveyor Coxe
Superintdt Mily Stores Irving

In the hands of the former is the appointment of every subordinate officer, not a single one (but their clerks) being appointable by the latter. Taking a view of this subject in the only year I can now come at, the clerk hire of the naval officer surveyor is only 2196 D. that of the commr of loans 2500–4696. The compensation of the nav. off. surveyor were 7651 D. in that year. The residue of custom house expenses were 46268 D. constituting the compensation and patronage of the collector, except about 1500 D. to the officers of the revenue cutter who are republican. The emoluments patronage of the 5 other republican officers I have no materials for estimating; but they are not small. Considering numbers therefore as the ratio of participation, it stands at 5 to 3. But taking emolument and patronage as the measure, our actual share is much greater. I cannot therefore suppose that our friends had sufficiently examined the fact when they alleged that, in “Philadelphia public employment under the general government, in all it’s grades, with scarcely an exception, is confined not to federalists merely, but to apostates, persecutors and enemies of representative government.”

I give full credit to the wisdom of the measures persued by the gov’r. of Pennsylvania in removals from office. I have no doubt he followed the wish of the state: and he had no other to consult. But in the general government each state is to be administered not on it’s local principles, but on the principles of all the states formed into a general result. That I should administer the affairs of Massachusetts Connecticut, for example, on federal principles, could not be approved. I dare say too that the extensive removals from office in Pennsylva. may have contributed to the great conversion which has been manifested among it’s citizens. But I respect them too much to believe it has been the exclusive or even the principle motive. I presume the sound measures of their government, of the general one, have weighed more in their estimation and conversion, than the consideration of the particular agents employed.

I read with extreme gratification the approbation expressed of the general measures of the present administration. I verily believe our friends have not differed with us on a single measure of importance. It is only as to the distribution of office that some difference of opinion has appeared. But that difference will I think be lessened when facts principles are more accurately scanned, and it’s impression still more so when justice is done to motives, and to the duty of pursuing that which on mature consideration is deemed to be right.

I hope you will pardon the trouble which this communication proposes to give you, when you attend to the considerations urging it. And that you will accept my respectful salutations assurances of great esteem. 1

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 31, 03
Monticello
James Madison
Madison, James

TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE (JAMES MADISON.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I return you the petition of Samuel Miller with the pardon signed. Mr. Kelty had spoken to me on this subject and told me that he and Mr. Craunch should join in a recommendation. I wish Mr. Wagner would obtain this before he delivers the pardon. I return also Mr. King’s letter which has really important matter, especially what respects the mare clausum, the abandonment of the colonial system, emancipation of S. America. On the subject of our seamen as both parties were agreed against impressments at sea, and concealments in port, I suppose we may practice on those two articles as things understood, altho’ no convention was signed. I see that the principle of free bottoms, free goods must be left to make its way by treaty with particular nations. Great Britain will never yield to it willingly and she cannot be forced.

I think I have selected a governor for Louisiana, as perfect in all points as we can expect. Sound judgment, standing in society, knolege of the world, wealth, liberality, familiarity with the French language, and having a French wife. You will perceive I am describing Sumpter. I do not know a more proper character for the place. I wish we could find a diplomatist or two equally eligible, for Europe. Accept my affectionate salutations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Aug. 9, 1803
Monticello
John Dickinson
Dickinson, John

TO JOHN DICKINSON

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—Your friendly favor of the 1st inst. is received with that welcome which always accompanies the approbation of the wise good. The acquisition of New Orleans would of itself have been a great thing, as it would have ensured to our western brethren the means of exporting their produce: but that of Louisiana is inappreciable, because, giving us the sole dominion of the Mississippi, it excludes those bickerings with foreign powers, which we know of a certainty would have put us at war with France immediately: and it secures to us the course of a peaceable nation.

The unquestioned bounds of Louisiana are the Iberville Mississippi on the east, the Mexicana, or the Highlands east of it, on the west; then from the head of the Mexicana gaining the highlands which include the waters of the Mississippi, and following those highlands round the head springs of the western waters of the Mississippi to its source where we join the English or perhaps to the Lake of the Woods. This may be considered as a triangle, one leg of which is the length of the Missouri, the other of the Mississippi, and the hypothenuse running from the source of the Missouri to the mouth of the Mississippi. I should be averse to exchanging any part of this for the Floridas, because it would let Spain into the Mississippi on the principle of natural right, we have always urged are now urging to her, that a nation inhabiting the upper part of a stream has a right of innocent passage down that stream to the ocean: and because the Floridas will fall to us peaceably the first war Spain is engaged in. We have some pretensions to extend the western territory of Louisiana to the Rio Norte, or Bravo; and still stronger the eastern boundary to the Rio Perdido between the rivers Mobile Pensacola. These last are so strong that France had not relinquished them our negotiator expressly declared we should claim them, by properly availing ourselves of these with offers of a price, and our peace, we shall get the Floridas in good time. But in the meantime we shall enter on the exercise of the right of passing down all the rivers which rising in our territory, run thro’ the Floridas. Spain will not oppose it by force. But there is a difficulty in this acquisition which presents a handle to the malcontents among us, though they have not yet discovered it. Our confederation is certainly confined to the limits established by the revolution. The general government has no powers but such as the constitution has given it; and it has not given it a power of holding foreign territory, still less of incorporating it into the Union. An amendment of the Constitution seems necessary for this. In the meantime we must ratify pay our money, as we have treated, for a thing beyond the constitution, and rely on the nation to sanction an act done for its great good, without its previous authority. With respect to the disposal of the country, we must take the island of New Orleans and west side of the river as high up as Point Coupee, containing nearly the whole inhabitants, say about 50,000, and erect it into a state, or annex it to the Mississippi territory: and shut up all the rest from settlement for a long time to come, endeavoring to exchange some of the country there unoccupied by Indians for the lands held by the Indians on this side the Mississippi, who will be glad to cede us their country here for an equivalent there: and we may sell out our lands here pay the whole debt contracted before it comes due. The impost which will be paid by the inhabitants ceded will pay half the interest of the price we give: so that we really add only half the price to our debt. I have indulged myself in these details because the subject being new, it is advantageous to interchange ideas on it and to get our notions all corrected before we are obliged to act on them. In this idea I receive shall receive with pleasure anything which may occur to you. Accept my affectionate salutations assurances of my constant great esteem respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Sept. 14, 03
Monticello
James Madison
Madison, James

TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE (JAMES MADISON.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I now return you the several papers received by the last post, except those soliciting office, which as usual, are put into my bundle of like papers. I think it possible that Spain, recollecting our former eagerness for the island of N. Orleans, may imagine she can, by a free delivery of that, redeem the residue of Louisiana: and that she may withhold the peaceable cession of it. In that case no doubt force must be used. However the importance of this measure, the time the means, will be for discussion at our meeting on the 25th. In the meantime I think Clarke might be trusted with a general hint of the possibility of opposition from Spain, an instruction to sound in every direction, but with so much caution as to avoid suspicion, and to inform us whether he discovers any symptoms of doubt as to the delivery, to let us know the force Spain has there, where posted, how the inhabitants are likely to act, if we march a force there, and what numbers of them could be armed brought to act in opposition to us. We have time to receive this information before the day of ratification, and it would guide us in our provision of force for the object. Accept my affectionate salutations respects.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Octr 4, 03
Washington
Doctor Benjamin Rush
Rush, Doctor Benjamin

TO DOCTOR BENJAMIN RUSH

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—No one would more willingly than myself pay the just tribute due to the services of Capt. Barry, by writing a letter of condolence to his widow, as you suggest. But when one undertakes to administer justice, it must be with an even hand, by rule; what is done for one, must be done for every one in equal degree. To what a train of attentions would this draw a President? How difficult would it be to draw the line between that degree of merit entitled to such a testimonial of it, that not so entitled? If drawn in a particular case differently from what the friends of the deceased would judge right, what offence would it give, of the most tender kind? How much offence would be given by accidental inattentions, or want of information? The first step into such an undertaking ought to be well weighed. On the death of Dr. Franklin, the King Convention of France went into mourning. So did the House of Reps. of the U. S.: the Senate refused. I proposed to General Washington that the executive department should wear mourning; he declined it, because he said he should not know where to draw the line, if he once began that ceremony. Mr. Adams was then Vice President, I thought Genl. W. had his eye on him, whom he certainly did not love. I told him the world had drawn so broad a line between himself Dr. Franklin, on the one side, and the residue of mankind, on the other, that we might wear mourning for them, and the question still remain new undecided as to all others. He thought it best, however, to avoid it. On these considerations alone, however well affected to the merit of Commodore Barry, I think it prudent not to engage myself in a practice which may become embarrassing.

Tremendous times in Europe! How mighty this battle of lions tygers! With what sensations should the common herd of cattle look on it? With no partialities, certainly. If they can so far worry one another as to destroy their power of tyrannizing, the one over the earth, the other the waters, the world may perhaps enjoy peace, till they recruit again.

Affectionate respectful salutations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
October 17, 1803

THIRD ANNUAL MESSAGE 1

j. mss.
To the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States:

In calling you together, fellow citizens, at an earlier day than was contemplated by the act of the last session of Congress, I have not been insensible to the personal inconveniences necessarily resulting from an unexpected change in your arrangements. But matters of great public concernment have rendered this call necessary, and the interest you feel in these will supersede in your minds all private considerations.

Congress witnessed, at their last session, the extraordinary agitation produced in the public mind by the suspension of our right of deposit at the port of New Orleans, no assignment of another place having been made according to treaty. They were sensible that the continuance of that privation would be more injurious to our nation than any consequences which could flow from any mode of redress, but reposing just confidence in the good faith of the government whose officer had committed the wrong, friendly and reasonable representations were resorted to, and the right of deposit was restored.

Previous, however, to this period, we had not been unaware of the danger to which our peace would be perpetually exposed while so important a key to the commerce of the western country remained under foreign power. Difficulties, too, were presenting themselves as to the navigation of other streams, which, arising within our territories, pass through those adjacent. Propositions had, therefore, been authorized for obtaining, on fair conditions, the sovereignty of New Orleans, and of other possessions in that quarter interesting to our quiet, to such extent as was deemed practicable; and the provisional appropriation of two millions of dollars, to be applied and accounted for by the president of the United States, intended as part of the price, was considered as conveying the sanction of Congress to the acquisition proposed. The enlightened government of France saw, with just discernment, the importance to both nations of such liberal arrangements as might best and permanently promote the peace, friendship, and interests of both; and the property and sovereignty of all Louisiana, which had been restored to them, have on certain conditions been transferred to the United States by instruments bearing date the 30th of April last. When these shall have received the constitutional sanction of the senate, they will without delay be communicated to the representatives also, for the exercise of their functions, as to those conditions which are within the powers vested by the constitution in Congress. While the property and sovereignty of the Mississippi and its waters secure an independent outlet for the produce of the western States, and an uncontrolled navigation through their whole course, free from collision with other powers and the dangers to our peace from that source, the fertility of the country, its climate and extent, promise in due season important aids to our treasury, an ample provision for our posterity, and a wide-spread field for the blessings of freedom and equal laws.

With the wisdom of Congress it will rest to take those ulterior measures which may be necessary for the immediate occupation and temporary government of the country; for its incorporation into our Union; for rendering the change of government a blessing to our newly-adopted brethren; for securing to them the rights of conscience and of property: for confirming to the Indian inhabitants their occupancy and self-government, establishing friendly and commercial relations with them, and for ascertaining the geography of the country acquired. Such materials for your information, relative to its affairs in general, as the short space of time has permitted me to collect, will be laid before you when the subject shall be in a state for your consideration.

Another important acquisition of territory has also been made since the last session of Congress. The friendly tribe of Kaskaskia Indians with which we have never had a difference, reduced by the wars and wants of savage life to a few individuals unable to defend themselves against the neighboring tribes, has transferred its country to the United States, reserving only for its members what is sufficient to maintain them in an agricultural way. The considerations stipulated are, that we shall extend to them our patronage and protection, and give them certain annual aids in money, in implements of agriculture, and other articles of their choice. This country, among the most fertile within our limits, extending along the Mississippi from the mouth of the Illinois to and up the Ohio, though not so necessary as a barrier since the acquisition of the other bank, may yet be well worthy of being laid open to immediate settlement, as its inhabitants may descend with rapidity in support of the lower country should future circumstances expose that to a foreign enterprise. As the stipulations in this treaty also involve matters within the competence of both houses only, it will be laid before Congress as soon as the senate shall have advised its ratification.

With many other Indian tribes, improvements in agriculture and household manufacture are advancing, and with all our peace and friendship are established on grounds much firmer than heretofore. The measure adopted of establishing trading houses among them, and of furnishing them necessaries in exchange for their commodities, at such moderated prices as leave no gain, but cover us from loss, has the most conciliatory and useful effect upon them, and is that which will best secure their peace and good will.

The small vessels authorized by Congress with a view to the Mediterranean service, have been sent into that sea, and will be able more effectually to confine the Tripoline cruisers within their harbors, and supersede the necessity of convoy to our commerce in that quarter. They will sensibly lessen the expenses of that service the ensuing year.

A further knowledge of the ground in the north-eastern and north-western angles of the United States has evinced that the boundaries established by the treaty of Paris, between the British territories and ours in those parts, were too imperfectly described to be susceptible of execution. It has therefore been thought worthy of attention, for preserving and cherishing the harmony and useful intercourse subsisting between the two nations, to remove by timely arrangements what unfavorable incidents might otherwise render a ground of future misunderstanding. A convention has therefore been entered into, which provides for a practicable demarkation of those limits to the satisfaction of both parties.

An account of the receipts and expenditures of the year ending 30th September last, with the estimates for the service of the ensuing year, will be laid before you by the secretary of the treasury so soon as the receipts of the last quarter shall be returned from the more distant states. It is already ascertained that the amount paid into the treasury for that year has been between eleven and twelve millions of dollars, and that the revenue accrued during the same term exceeds the sum counted on as sufficient for our current expenses, and to extinguish the public debt within the period heretofore proposed.

The amount of debt paid for the same year is about three millions one hundred thousand dollars, exclusive of interest, and making, with the payment of the preceding year, a discharge of more than eight millions and a half of dollars of the principal of that debt, besides the accruing interest; and there remain in the treasury nearly six millions of dollars. Of these, eight hundred and eighty thousand have been reserved for payment of the first instalment due under the British convention of January 8th, 1802, and two millions are what have been before mentioned as placed by Congress under the power and accountability of the president, toward the price of New Orleans and other territories acquired, which, remaining untouched, are still applicable to that object, and go in diminution of the sum to be funded for it.

Should the acquisition of Louisiana be constitutionally confirmed and carried into effect, a sum of nearly thirteen millions of dollars will then be added to our public debt, most of which is payable after fifteen years; before which term the present existing debts will all be discharged by the established operation of the sinking fund. When we contemplate the ordinary annual augmentation of imposts from increasing population and wealth, the augmentation of the same revenue by its extension to the new acquisition, and the economies which may still be introduced into our public expenditures, I cannot but hope that Congress in reviewing their resources will find means to meet the intermediate interests of this additional debt without recurring to new taxes, and applying to this object only the ordinary progression of our revenue. Its extraordinary increase in times of foreign war will be the proper and sufficient fund for any measures of safety or precaution which that state of things may render necessary in our neutral position.

Remittances for the instalments of our foreign debt having been found impracticable without loss, it has not been thought expedient to use the power given by a former act of Congress of continuing them by reloans, and of redeeming instead thereof equal sums of domestic debt, although no difficulty was found in obtaining that accommodation.

The sum of fifty thousand dollars appropriated by Congress for providing gun-boats, remains unexpended. The favorable and peaceful turn of affairs on the Mississippi rendered an immediate execution of that law unnecessary, and time was desirable in order that the institution of that branch of our force might begin on models the most approved by experience. The same issue of events dispensed with a resort to the appropriation of a million and a half of dollars contemplated for purposes which were effected by happier means.

We have seen with sincere concern the flames of war lighted up again in Europe, and nations with which we have the most friendly and useful relations engaged in mutual destruction. While we regret the miseries in which we see others involved let us bow with gratitude to that kind Providence which, inspiring with wisdom and moderation our late legislative councils while placed under the urgency of the greatest wrongs, guarded us from hastily entering into the sanguinary contest, and left us only to look on and to pity its ravages. These will be heaviest on those immediately engaged. Yet the nations pursuing peace will not be exempt from all evil. In the course of this conflict, let it be our endeavor, as it is our interest and desire, to cultivate the friendship of the belligerent nations by every act of justice and of incessant kindness; to receive their armed vessels with hospitality from the distresses of the sea, but to administer the means of annoyance to none; to establish in our harbors such a police as may maintain law and order; to restrain our citizens from embarking individually in a war in which their country takes no part; to punish severely those persons, citizen or alien, who shall usurp the cover of our flag for vessels not entitled to it, infecting thereby with suspicion those of real Americans, and committing us into controversies for the redress of wrongs not our own; to exact from every nation the observance, toward our vessels and citizens, of those principles and practices which all civilized people acknowledge; to merit the character of a just nation, and maintain that of an independent one, preferring every consequence to insult and habitual wrong. Congress will consider whether the existing laws enable us efficaciously to maintain this course with our citizens in all places, and with others while within the limits of our jurisdiction, and will give them the new modifications necessary for these objects. Some contraventions of right have already taken place, both within our jurisdictional limits and on the high seas. The friendly disposition of the governments from whose agents they have proceeded, as well as their wisdom and regard for justice, leave us in reasonable expectation that they will be rectified and prevented in future; and that no act will be countenanced by them which threatens to disturb our friendly intercourse. Separated by a wide ocean from the nations of Europe, and from the political interests which entangle them together, with productions and wants which render our commerce and friendship useful to them and theirs to us, it cannot be the interest of any to assail us, nor ours to disturb them. We should be most unwise, indeed, were we to cast away the singular blessings of the position in which nature has placed us, the opportunity she has endowed us with of pursuing, at a distance from foreign contentions, the paths of industry, peace, and happiness; of cultivating general friendship, and of bringing collisions of interest to the umpirage of reason rather than of force. How desirable then must it be, in a government like ours, to see its citizens adopt individually the views, the interests, and the conduct which their country should pursue, divesting themselves of those passions and partialities which tend to lessen useful friendships, and to embarrass and embroil us in the calamitous scenes of Europe. Confident, fellow citizens, that you will duly estimate the importance of neutral dispositions toward the observance of neutral conduct, that you will be sensible how much it is our duty to look on the bloody arena spread before us with commiseration indeed, but with no other wish than to see it closed, I am persuaded you will cordially cherish these dispositions in all discussions among yourselves, and in all communications with your constituents; and I anticipate with satisfaction the measures of wisdom which the great interests now committed to you will give you an opportunity of providing, and myself that of approving and carrying into execution with the fidelity I owe to my country.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
October 21, 1803

SPECIAL MESSAGE ON LOUISIANA

j. mss.
To the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States:

In my communications to you of the 17th instant, I informed you that the conventions had been entered into with the government of France for the cession of Louisiana to the United States. These, with the advice and consent of the Senate, having now been ratified, and my ratification exchanged for that of the first consul of France in due form, they are communicated to you for consideration in your legislative capacity. You will observe that some important conditions cannot be carried into execution, but with the aid of the legislature; and that time presses a decision on them without delay.

The ulterior provisions, also suggested in the same communication, for the occupation and government of the country, will call for early attention. Such information relative to its government, as time and distance have enabled me to obtain, will be ready to be laid before you within a few days. But, as permanent arrangements for this object may require time and deliberation, it is for your consideration whether you will not, forthwith, make such temporary provisions for the preservation, in the meanwhile, of order and tranquillity in the country, as the case may require.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
October 29, 1803
Albert Gallatin
Gallatin, Albert

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY (ALBERT GALLATIN.)

j. mss.

I must ask the favor of you to meet the heads of Departments here to-morrow at 12 o’clock and afterwards to dine with us. The object is to decide definitely on the arrangements which are to be despatched westwardly the next day. General Dearborn and myself had concluded to submit to the meeting a plan little different from that suggested in your letter of yesterday. To wit, to send orders to Claiborne and Wilkinson to march instantly five hundred regulars (which are prepared) from Fort Adams, and one thousand militia from the Mississippi Territory (if the information from Laussat to them shall indicate refusal from Spain). To send hence on the same day a call on the Governor of Tennessee for two thousand volunteers, and of Kentucky for four thousand, to be officered, organized, accoutred, and mustered on a day to be named, such as that Claiborne and Wilkinson might by that day send them information whether they would be wanted, and to march or do otherwise accordingly. I had since thought myself to propose that, on receiving information that there would be resistance, they should send sufficient parties of regulars and militia across the Mississippi to take by surprise New Madrid, St. Genevieve, St. Louis, and all the other small posts, and that all this should be made as much as possible the act of France, by including Laussat, with the aid of Clark, to raise an insurrectionary force of the inhabitants, to which ours might be only auxiliary. But all this, with much more, is to be considered to-morrow. Affectionate salutations. 1

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Nov. ? 1803

RULES OF ETIQUETTE 1

j. mss.

i. In order to bring the members of society together in the first instance, the custom of the country has established that residents shall pay the first visit to strangers, and, among strangers, first comers to later comers, foreign and domestic; the character of stranger ceasing after the first visits. To this rule there is a single exception. Foreign ministers, from the necessity of making themselves known, pay the first visit to the ministers of the nation, which is returned.

ii. When brought together in society, all are perfectly equal, whether foreign or domestic, titled or untitled, in or out of office.

All other observances are but exemplifications of these two principles.

I. 1st. The families of foreign ministers, arriving at the seat of government, receive the first visit from those of the national ministers, as from all other residents.

2d. Members of the Legislature and of the Judiciary, independent of their offices, have a right as strangers to receive the first visit.

II. 1st. No title being admitted here, those of foreigners give no precedence.

2d. Differences of grade among diplomatic members, give no precedence.

3d. At public ceremonies, to which the government invites the presence of foreign ministers and their families, a convenient seat or station will be provided for them, with any other strangers invited and the families of the national ministers, each taking place as they arrive, and without any precedence.

4th. To maintain the principle of equality, or of pêle mêle, and prevent the growth of precedence out of courtesy, the members of the Executive will practice at their own houses, and recommend an adherence to the ancient usage of the country, of gentlemen in mass giving precedence to the ladies in mass, in passing from one apartment where they are assembled into another.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Nov. 4, 1803
Washington
Robert R. Livingston
Livingston, Robert R.

TO THE U. S. MINISTER TO FRANCE (ROBERT R. LIVINGSTON.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—A report reaches us this day from Baltimore, (on probable, but not certain grounds,) that Mr. Jerome Bonaparte, brother of the First Consul, was yesterday 1 married to Miss Patterson, of that city. The effect of this measure on the mind of the First Consul, is not for me to suppose; but as it might occur to him, prima facie, that the Executive of the U. S. ought to have prevented it, I have thought it advisable to mention the subject to you, that, if necessary, you may be explanations set that idea to rights. You know that by our laws, all persons are free to enter into marriage, if of 21 years of age, no one having a power to restrain it, not even their parents; and that under that age, no one can prevent it but the parent or guardian. The lady is under age, and the parents, placed between her affections, which were strongly fixed, and the considerations opposing the measure, yielded with pain anxiety to the former. Mr. Patterson is the President of the Bank of Baltimore, the wealthiest man in Maryland, perhaps in the U. S., except Mr. Carroll; a man of great virtue respectability; the mother is the sister of the lady of General Saml Smith; and, consequently, the station of the family in society is with the first of the U. S. These circumstances fix rank in a country where there are no hereditary titles.

Your treaty has obtained nearly a general approbation. The federalists spoke voted against it, but they are now so reduced in their numbers as to be nothing. The question on its ratification in the Senate was decided by 24 against 7, which was 10 more than enough. The vote in the H. of R. for making provision for its execution was carried by 89 against 23, which was a majority of 66, and the necessary bills are going through the Houses by greater majorities. Mr. Pichon, according to instructions from his government, proposed to have added to the ratification a protestation against any failure in time or other circumstances of execution, on our part. He was told, that in that case we should annex a counter protestation, which would leave the thing exactly where it was. That this transaction had been conducted, from the commencement of the negociation to this stage of it, with a frankness sincerity honorable to both nations, and comfortable to the heart of an honest man to review; that to annex to this last chapter of the transaction such an evidence of mutual distrust, was to change its aspect dishonorably for us both, and contrary to truth as to us; for that we had not the smallest doubt that France would punctually execute its part; I assured Mr. Pichon that I had more confidence in the word of the First Consul than in all the parchment we could sign. He saw that we had ratified the treaty; that both branches had passed, by great majorities, one of the bills for execution, would soon pass the other two; that no circumstance remained that could leave a doubt of our punctual performance; like an able an honest minister, (which he is in the highest degree,) he undertook to do what he knew his employers would do themselves, were they here spectators of all the existing circumstances, and exchanged the ratifications purely and simply: so that this instrument goes to the world as an evidence of the candor confidence of the nations in each other, which will have the best effects. This was the more justifiable, as Mr. Pichon knew that Spain had entered with us a protestation against our ratification of the treaty, grounded 1st, on the assertion that the First Consul had not executed the conditions of the treaties of cession; , 2ly, that he had broken a solemn promise not to alienate the country to any nation. We answered, that these were private questions between France Spain, which they must settle together; that we derived our title from the First Consul, did not doubt his guarantee of it; and we, four days ago, sent off orders to the Governor of the Mississippi territory General Wilkinson to move down with the troops at hand to New Orleans, to receive the possession from Mr. Laussat. If he is heartily disposed to carry the order of the Consul into execution, he can probably command a voluntary force at New Orleans, and will have the aid of ours also, if he desires it, to take the possession, deliver it to us. If he is not so disposed, we shall take the possession, it will rest with the government of France, by adopting the act as their own, obtaining the confirmation of Spain, to supply the non-execution of their stipulation to deliver, to entitle themselves to the compleat execution of our part of the agreements. In the meantime, the Legislature is passing the bills, and we are preparing everything to be done on our part towards execution; and we shall not avail ourselves of the three months’ delay after possession of the province, allowed by the treaty for the delivery of the stock, but shall deliver it the moment that possession is known here, which will be on the 18th day after it has taken place.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Nov. 24, 03
Washington
John Breckenridge
Breckenridge, John

TO JOHN BRECKENRIDGE

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I thought I perceived in you the other day a dread of the job of preparing a constitution for the new acquisition. With more boldness than wisdom I therefore determined to prepare a canvass, give it a few daubs of outline, and send it to you to fill up. I yesterday morning took up the subject and scribbled off the inclosed. In communicating it to you I must do it in confidence that you will never let any person know that I have put pen to paper on the subject and that if you think the inclosed can be of any aid to you you will take the trouble to copy it return me the original. I am this particular, because you know with what bloody teeth fangs the federalists will attack any sentiment or principle known to come from me, what blackguardisms personalities they make it the occasion of vomiting forth. My time does not permit me to go into explanation of the inclosed by letter. I will only observe therefore as to a single feature of the legislature, that the idea of an Assembly of Notables came into my head while writing, as a thing more familiar pleasing to the French, than a legislation of judges. True it removes their dependence from the judges to the Executive: but this is what they are used to would prefer. Should Congress reject the nomination of judges for 4 years make them during good behavior, as is probable, then, should the judges take a kink in their heads in favor of leaving the present laws of Louisiana unaltered, that evil will continue for their lives, unamended by us, and become so inveterate that we may never be able to introduce the uniformity of law so desirable. The making the same persons so directly judges legislators is more against principle, than to make the same persons Executive, and the elector of the legislative members. The former too are placed above all responsibility, the latter is under a perpetual control if he goes wrong. The judges have to act on 9. out of 10. of the laws which are made; the governor not on one in 10. But strike it out insert the judges if you think it better, as it was a sudden conceit to which I am not attached; and make what alterations you please, as I had never [had] before time to think on the subject, or form the outlines of any plan, probably shall not again. Accept my friendly salutations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Dec. 1, 03
Washington
John Randolph
Randolph, John

TO JOHN RANDOLPH

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—The explanation in your letter of yesterday was quite unnecessary to me. I have had too satisfactory proofs of your friendly regard, to be disposed to suspect anything of a contrary aspect. I understood perfectly the expressions stated in the newspaper to which you allude, to mean, that “tho’ the proposition came from the republican quarter of the House, yet you should not concur with it.” I am aware that in parts of the Union, even with persons to whom Mr. Eppes and Mr. Randolph are unknown, myself little known, it will be presumed from their connection, that what comes from them comes from me. No men on earth are more independent in their sentiments than they are, nor any one less disposed than I am to influence the opinions of others. We rarely speak of politics, or of the proceedings of the House, but merely historically, and I carefully avoid expressing an opinion on them, in their presence, that we may all be at our ease. With other members, I have believed that more unreserved communications would be advantageous to the public. This has been, perhaps, prevented by mutual delicacy. I have been afraid to express opinions unasked, lest I should be suspected of wishing to direct the legislative action of members. They have avoided asking communications from me, probably, lest they should be suspected of wishing to fish out executive secrets. I see too many proofs of the imperfection of human reason, to entertain wonder or intolerance at any difference of opinion on any subject; and acquiesce in that difference as easily as on a difference of feature or form; experience having long taught me the reasonableness of mutual sacrifices of opinion among those who are to act together for any common object, and the expediency of doing what good we can, when we cannot do all we would wish.

Accept my friendly salutations, and assurances of great esteem respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Dec. 2, 03
Washington
de Witt Clinton
Clinton, de Witt

TO DE WITT CLINTON

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—Your favor of the 26th ult. has been received. Mr. Van Wyck’s appointment as commr. of bankruptcy only awaits Mr. Sandford’s resignation. The papers in the case of Lt. Wolstencroft shall be recommended to the inquiries attentions of the Secretary at War. I should think it indeed a serious misfortune should a change in the administration of your government be hazarded before its present principles be well established through all its parts. Yet, on reflection, you will be sensible that the delicacy of my situation, considering who may be competitors, forbids my intermeddling, even so far as to write the letter you suggest. I can therefore only brood in silence over my secret wishes.

I am less able to give you the proceedings of Congress than your correspondents who are of that body. More difference of opinion seems to exist as to the manner of disposing of Louisiana, than I had imagined possible: and our leading friends are not yet sufficiently aware of the necessity of accommodation mutual sacrifice of opinion for conducting a numerous assembly, where the opposition too is drilled to act in phalanx on every question. Altho’ it is acknoleged that our new fellow citizens are as yet as incapable of self government as children, yet some cannot bring themselves to suspend its principles for a single moment. The temporary or territorial government of that country therefore will encounter great difficulty. The question too whether the settlement of upper Louisiana shall be prohibited occasions a great division of our friends. Some are for prohibiting it till another amendment of the constn shall permit it; others for prohibiting by authority of the legislature only, a third set for permitting immediate settlement. Those of the first opinion apprehend that if the legislature may open a land office there, it will become the ruling principle of elections, end in a yazoo scheme: those of the 2d opinion fear they may never get an amendment of the constitution permitting the settlement. Accept my friendly salutations assurances of great esteem respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Dec. 13, 03
Washington
Albert Gallatin
Gallatin, Albert

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY (ALBERT GALLATIN.)

j. mss.

The Attorney Genl having considered and decided that the prescription in the law for establishing a bank, that the officers in the subordinate offices of discount deposit, shall be appointed “on the same terms and in the same manner practised in the principal bank,” does not extend to them the principle of rotation, established by the Legislature in the body of directors in the principal bank, it follows that the extension of that principle has been merely a voluntary prudential act of the principal bank, from which they are free to depart. I think the extension was wise proper on their part, because the Legislature having deemed rotation useful in the principal bank constituted by them, there would be the same reason for it in the subordinate banks to be established by the principal. It breaks in upon the esprit de corps so apt to prevail in permanent bodies; it gives a chance for the public eye penetrating into the sanctuary of those proceedings practices, which the avarice of the directors may introduce for their personal emolument, which the resentments of excluded directors, or the honesty of those duly admitted, might betray to the public; and it gives an opportunity at the end of the year, or at other periods, of correcting a choice, which, on trial, proves to have been unfortunate; an evil of which themselves complain in their distant institutions. Whether, however, they have a power to alter this, or not, the executive has no right to decide; their consultation with you has been merely an act of complaisance, or a desire to shield so important an innovation under the cover of executive sanction. But ought we to volunteer our sanction in such a case? Ought we to disarm ourselves of any fair right of animadversion, whenever that institution shall be a legitimate subject of consideration? I own, I think the most proper answer would be, that we do not think ourselves authorized to give an opinion on the question.

From a passage in the letter of the President, I observe an idea of establishing a branch bank of the U. S. in New Orleans. This institution is one of the most deadly hostility existing, against the principles form of our Constitution. The nation is, at this time, so strong united in it’s sentiments, that it cannot be shaken at this moment. But suppose a series of untoward events should occur, sufficient to bring into doubt the competency of a republican government to meet a crisis of great danger, or to unhinge the confidence of the people in the public functionaries; an institution like this, penetrating by it’s branches every part of the Union, acting by command in phalanx, may, in a critical moment, upset the government. I deem no government safe which is under the vassalage of any self-constituted authorities, or any other authority than that of the nation, or it’s regular functionaries. What an obstruction could not this bank of the U. S., with all it’s branch banks, be in time of war? It might dictate to us the peace we should accept, or withdraw it’s aids. Ought we then to give further growth to an institution so powerful, so hostile? That it is so hostile we know, 1, from a knowledge of the principles of the persons composing the body of directors in every bank, principal or branch; and those of most of the stockholders: 2, from their opposition to the measures principles of the government, to the election of those friendly to them: and 3, from the sentiments of the newspapers they support. Now, while we are strong, it is the greatest duty we owe to the safety of our Constitution, to bring this powerful enemy to a perfect subordination under it’s authorities. The first measure would be to reduce them to an equal footing only with other banks, as to the favors of the government. But, in order to be able to meet a general combination of the banks against us, in a critical emergency, could we not make a beginning towards an independent use of our own money, towards holding our own bank in all the deposits where it is received, and letting the treasurer give his draft or note, for payment at any particular place, which, in a well-conducted government, ought to have as much credit as any private draft, or bank note, or bill, and would give us the same facilities which we derive from the banks? I pray you to turn this subject in your mind, and to give it the benefit of your knowledge of details; whereas, I have only very general views of the subject. Affectionate salutations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Jan. 8, 1804
Washington
James Monroe
Monroe, James

TO THE SPECIAL ENVOY (JAMES MONROE.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—A confidential opportunity offering by Mr. Baring, I can venture to write to you with less reserve than common conveyances admit. The 150 livres you paid to Mr. Chas for me shall be replaced in the hands of Mr. Lewis your manager here, with thanks to you for honoring what you had no reason to doubt was a just claim on me. I do not know him personally or any otherwise than by his history of our Revolution, of Buonaparte, a single copy of which he sent me. I never heard of any other being sent, nor should I have undertaken, or he expected me, to be the vender of his books here, to keep accounts and make remittances for him. If he has sent any copies for sale to my care, I have never heard of them. Isaac Coles, son of Colo. Coles our neighbor is gone to London, Paris, c. He asked from me a letter to you. I told him I had been obliged to make it a rule to give no letters of introduction while in my present office; but that in my first letter to you I would mention to you the reason why I gave him none. He is a most worthy young man, one whom I had intended to have asked to be my Secretary, had Mr. Harvie declined the offer. You know the worth of his family. I inclose you two letters for Mr. Williams, asking you from your knolege of persons and things to use your discretion for me, and deliver whichever you think best, suppressing the other. With respect to my correspondence with literary characters in Europe, to the great mass of those who send me copies of their works, being otherwise unknown to me, or perhaps not advantageously known, I return them simple notes of thanks, sometimes saying I have no doubt I shall have great satisfaction in persuing their works as soon as my occupations will permit; and, where I have found the work to possess merit, saying so in a complimentary way. With Volney, Dupont, Cabanis, Cepede, I had intimate very friendly intercourse in France, with the two first here. With Sr. John Sinclair I had the same in France England, and with Mr. Strickland here. To these persons I write freely on subjects of literature, and to a certain degree on politics, respecting however their personal opinions, and their situation so as not to compromit them were a letter intercepted. Indeed what I write to them in this way are for the most part such truths sentiments as would do us good if known to their government, and, as probably as not, are communicated to them. To the Earl Buchan I have written one letter in answer to the compliment of a volume of his which he sent me. He is an honorable, patriotic, virtuous character, was in correspondence with Dr. Franklin and General Washington, had every title to a respectful answer from me. I expressed myself to him in terms which were true, therefore the more satisfactory to him. I have received a volume of geology, of great merit, from Faufas de St. Fond. I did not know him personally, nor do I know the standing he holds in society or his government; but an intimate acquaintance of his here gives me a good account of him as an amiable and virtuous man. My answer to him will be more than a mere compliment of thanks, but confined to the branch of science which is the subject of his work. An opening has been given me of making a communication which will be acceptable to the emperor Alexander, either directly or indirectly, and as from one private individual to another. I have not decided whether to do it or not. This is the whole extent of the literary correspondence which I now keep up in Europe, and I set the more value on it inasmuch as I can make private friendships instrumental to the public good by inspiring a confidence which is denied to public, and official communications.

I expect this evening’s post will bring us the account that Louisiana was formally delivered to us about the 16th of December. This acquisition is seen by our constituents in all it’s importance, they do justice to all those who have been instrumental towards it. Fortunately, the federal leaders have had the imprudence to oppose it pertinaciously, which has given an occasion to a great proportion of their quondam honest adherents to abandon them and join the republican standard. They feel themselves now irretrievably lost, and are ceasing to make further opposition in the states, or anywhere but in Congress. I except however N. Hampshire, Mass. Connect. Delaware. The 1st will be with us in the course of this year; Connecticut is advancing with a slow but steady step, never losing the ground she gains; Massachusetts has a Republicanism of so flaccid a texture, and Delaware so much affected by every little topical information, that we must wait for them with patience good Humour. Congress is now engaged in a bill for the government of Louisiana. It is impossible to foresee in what shape it will come out. They talk of giving 5,000 D. to the Governor, but the bill also proposes to commence at the close of this session. I have in private conversations demonstrated to individuals that that is impossible; that the necessary officers cannot be mustered there under 6 months. If they give that time for it’s commencement, it may admit our appointing you to that office, as I presume you could be in place with a term not much beyond that, in the interval the Secretary of the state would govern. But the idea of the public as to the importance of that office would not bear a long absence of the principal. You are not to calculate that 5,000 D. would place you by any means as much at your ease there as 9,000 D. where you are. In that station you cannot avoid expensive hospitality. Where you are, altho’ it is not pleasant to fall short in returning civilities, yet necessity has rendered this so familiar in Europe as not to lessen respect for the person whose circumstances do not permit a return of hospitalities. I see by your letters the pain which this situation gives you, and I can estimate its acuteness from the generosity of your nature. But, my dear friend, calculate with mathematical rigour the pain annexed to each branch of the dilemma pursue that which brings the least. To give up entertainment, to live with the most rigorous economy till you have cleared yourself of every demand is a pain for a definite time only: but to return here with accumulated encumbrances on you, will fill your life with torture. We wish to do everything for you which law rule will permit. But more than this would injure you as much as us. Believing that the mission to Spain will enable you to suspend expense greatly in London, to apply your salary during your absence to the clearing off your debt, you will be instructed to proceed there as soon as you shall have regulated certain points of neutral right for us with England, or as soon as you find nothing in that way can be done. This you should hurry as much as possible, that you may proceed to Spain, for settling with that court the boundaries of Louisiana. On this subject Mr. Madison will send you the copy of a memoir of mine, written last summer while I was among my books at Monticello. We scarcely expect any liberal or just settlement with Spain, and are perfectly determined to obtain or to take our just limits. How far you will suffer yourself to be detained there by the procrastinations of artifice or indolence must depend on the prospects which arise, and on your own determination to accept the government of Louisiana, which will admit but of a limited delay. It is probable that the inhabitants of Louisiana on the left bank of the Mississippi and inland Eastwardly to a considerable extent, will very soon claim to be received under our jurisdiction, and that this end of W. Florida will thus be peaceably got possession of. For Mobile and the Eastern end we shall await favorable conjunctures. If they refuse to let our vessels have free ingress egress in the Mobile to from the Tombiggy settlements, and if Spain is at war, the crisis there will be speedy. Fulwar Skipwith wishes office in Louisiana. But he should be made sensible of the impossibility of an office remaining vacant till we can import an incumbent from Europe. That of Govr. is the only one for which the law has made that sort of provision. Besides he has been so long absent from America, that he cannot have habits and feelings, and the tact necessary to be in unison with his countrymen here. He is much fitter for any matters of business (below that of diplomacy) which we may have to do in Europe. There is here a great sense of the inadequacy of C. Pinckney to the office he is in. His continuance is made a subject of standing reproach to myself personally, by whom the appointment was made before I had collected the administration. He declared at the time that nothing would induce him to continue so as not to be here at the ensuing Presidential election. I am persuaded he expected to be proposed at it as V. P. After he got to Europe his letters asked only a continuance of two years. But he now does not drop the least hint of a voluntary return. Pray, my dear sir, avail yourself of his vanity, his expectations, his fears, and whatever will weigh with him to induce him to ask leave to return, and obtain from him to be the bearer of the letter yourself. You will render us in this the most acceptable service possible. His enemies here are perpetually dragging his character in the dirt, and charging it on the administration. He does, or ought to know this, and to feel the necessity of coming home to vindicate himself, if he looks to anything further in the career of honor.

You ask for small news. Mr. Randolph Mr. Eppes are both of Congress, and now with me, their wives lying in at home. Trist was appointed collector of Natchez and on the removal of that office down to New Orleans will be continued there. His family still remain in Albemarle, but will join him in the spring. Dr. Bache has been to N. Orleans as Physician to the hospital there. He is returned to Philadelphia where his wife is, and where they will probably remain. Peachey Gilmer has married Miss House, and will go with the family to N. Orleans. Mr. Short has been to Kentucky, and will return to Europe in the spring. The deaths of Samuel Adams Judge Pendleton you will have heard of. Colo. N. Lewis, Divers the Carrs are all well and their families. Sam. Carr is now living in Albemarle. J. F. Mercer’s quarrel with his counsel has carried him over openly to the federalists. He is now in the Maryland legislature entirely thrown off by the republicans. He has never seen or written on these things to Mr. Madison or myself. When mentioning your going to N. Orleans that the salary there would not increase the ease of your situation, I meant to have added that the only considerations which might make it eligible to you were the facility of getting there the richest land in the world, the extraordinary profitableness of their culture, and that the removal of your slaves there might immediately put you under way. You alone however can weigh these things for yourself, and after all, it may depend on the time the legislature may give for commencing the new government. But, let us hear from you as soon as you can determine, that we may not incur the blame of waiting for nothing. Mr. Merry is with us, and we believe him to be personally as desirable a character as could have been sent us. But he is unluckily associated with one of an opposite character in every point. She has already disturbed our harmony extremely. He began by claiming the first visit from the national ministers. He corrected himself in this. But a pretension to take precedence at dinners c. over all others is persevered in. We have told him that the principle of society, as well as of government, with us, is the equality of the individuals composing it. That no man here would come to a dinner, where he was to be marked with inferiority to any other. That we might as well attempt to force our principle of equality at St. James’s as he his principle of precedent here. I had been in the habit, when I invited female company (having no lady in my family) to ask one of the ladies of the 4. secretaries to come take care of my company; and as she was to do the honors of the table I handed her to dinner myself. That Mr. Merry might not construe this as giving them a precedence over Mrs. Merry, I have discontinued it. And here as well as in private houses, the pêle-mêle practice, is adhered to. They have got Yrujo to take a zealous part in the claim of precedence: it has excited generally emotions of great contempt and indignation, (in which the members of the legislature participate sensibly,) that the agents of foreign nations should assume to dictate to us what shall be the laws of our society. The consequence will be that Mr. Mrs. Merry will put themselves into Coventry, that he will lose the best half of his usefulness to his nation, that derived from a perfectly familiar private intercourse with the secretaries myself. The latter be assured, is a virago, and in the short course of a few weeks has established a degree of dislike among all classes which one would have thought impossible in so short a time. Thornton has entered into their ideas. At this we wonder, because he is a plain man, a sensible one, too candid to be suspected of wishing to bring on their recall his own substitution. To counterwork their misrepresentations, it would be well their government should understand as much of these things as can be communicated with decency, that they may know the spirit in which their letters are written. We learn that Thornton thinks we are not as friendly now to Great Britain as before our acquisition of Louisiana. This is totally without foundation. Our friendship to that nation is cordial and sincere. So is that with France. We are anxious to see England maintain her standing, only wishing she would use her power on the ocean with justice. If she had done this heretofore, other nations would not have stood by and looked on with unconcern on a conflict which endangers her existence. We are not indifferent to it’s issue, nor should we be so on a conflict on which the existence of France should be in danger. We consider each as a necessary instrument to hold in check the disposition of the other to tyrannize over other nations. With respect to Merry, he appears so reasonable and good a man, that I should be sorry to lose him as long as there remains a possibility of reclaiming him to the exercise of his own dispositions. If his wife perseveres, she must eat her soup at home, and we shall endeavor to draw him into society as if she did not exist. It is unfortunate that the good understanding of nations should hang on the caprice of an individual, who ostensibly has nothing to do with them. Present my friendly respectful salutations to Mrs. Monroe Miss Eliza: and be assured yourself of my constant affections.

Jan. 16. Louisiana was delivered to our Commissioners on the 20th. Dec.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Jan. 17, 1804
Washington
Thomas McKean
McKean, Thomas

TO THOMAS McKEAN

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I have duly received your favor of the 8th but the act of ratification which it announces is not yet come to hand. No doubt it is on it’s way. That great opposition is and will be made by federalists to this amendment is certain. They know that if it prevails, neither a Presidt or Vice President can ever be made but by the fair vote of the majority of the nation, of which they are not. That either their opposition to the principle of discrimination now, or their advocation of it formerly was on party, not moral motives, they cannot deny. Consequently they fix for themselves the place in the scale of moral rectitude to which they are entitled. I am a friend to the discriminating principle; and for a reason more than others have, inasmuch as the discriminated vote of my constituents will express unequivocally the verdict they wish to cast on my conduct. The abominable slanders of my political enemies have obliged me to call for that verdict from my country in the only way it can be obtained, and if obtained it will be my sufficient voucher to the rest of the world to posterity, and leave me free to seek, at a definite time, the repose I sincerely wished to have retired to now. I suffer myself to make no inquiries as to the persons who are to be placed on the rolls of competition for the public favor. Respect for myself as well as for the public requires that I should be the silent passive subject of their consideration. We are now at work on a territorial division government for Louisiana. It will probably be a small improvement of our former territorial governments, or first grade of government. The act proposes to give them an assembly of Notables, selected by the Governor from the principal characters of the territory. This will, I think, be a better legislature than the former territorial one, will not be a greater departure from sound principle. Accept my friendly salutations assurances of high respect consideration.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Jan. 29, 1804
Washington
Doctor Joseph Priestley
Priestley, Doctor Joseph

TO DOCTOR JOSEPH PRIESTLEY

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—Your favor of December 12 came duly to hand, as did the 2 d . letter to Doctor Linn, and the treatise of Phlogiston, for which I pray you to accept my thanks. The copy for Mr. Livingston has been delivered, together with your letter to him, to Mr. Harvie, my secretary, who departs in a day or two for Paris, will deliver them himself to Mr. Livingston, whose attention to your matter cannot be doubted. I have also to add my thanks to Mr. Priestley, your son, for the copy of your Harmony, which I have gone through with great satisfaction. It is the first I have been able to meet with, which is clear of those long repetitions of the same transaction, as if it were a different one because related with some different circumstances.

I rejoice that you have undertaken the task of comparing the moral doctrines of Jesus with those of the ancient Philosophers. You are so much in possession of the whole subject, that you will do it easier better than any other person living. I think you cannot avoid giving, as preliminary to the comparison, a digest of his moral doctrines, extracted in his own words from the Evangelists, and leaving out everything relative to his personal history and character. It would be short and precious. With a view to do this for my own satisfaction, I had sent to Philadelphia to get two testaments Greek of the same edition, two English, with a design to cut out the morsels of morality, and paste them on the leaves of a book, in the manner you describe as having been pursued in forming your Harmony. But I shall now get the thing done by better hands.

I very early saw that Louisiana was indeed a speck in our horizon which was to burst in a tornado; and the public are unapprized how near this catastrophe was. Nothing but a frank friendly development of causes effects on our part, and good sense enough in Bonaparte to see that the train was unavoidable, and would change the face of the world, saved us from that storm. I did not expect he would yield till a war took place between France and England, and my hope was to palliate and endure, if Messrs. Ross, Morris, c. did not force a premature rupture, until that event. I believed the event not very distant, but acknolege it came on sooner than I had expected. Whether, however, the good sense of Bonaparte might not see the course predicted to be necessary unavoidable, even before a war should be imminent, was a chance which we thought it our duty to try; but the immediate prospect of rupture brought the case to immediate decision. The dénoument has been happy; and I confess I look to this duplication of area for the extending a government so free and economical as ours, as a great achievement to the mass of happiness which is to ensue. Whether we remain in one confederacy, or form into Atlantic and Mississippi confederacies, I believe not very important to the happiness of either part. Those of the western confederacy will be as much our children descendants as those of the eastern, and I feel myself as much identified with that country, in future time, as with this; and did I now foresee a separation at some future day, yet I should feel the duty the desire to promote the western interests as zealously as the eastern, doing all the good for both portions of our future family which should fall within my power.

Have you seen the new work of Malthus on population? It is one of the ablest I have ever seen. Altho’ his main object is to delineate the effects of redundancy of population, and to test the poor laws of England, other palliations for that evil, several important questions in political economy, allied to his subject incidentally, are treated with a masterly hand. It is a single 4 to . volume, and I have been only able to read a borrowed copy, the only one I have yet heard of. Probably our friends in England will think of you, give you an opportunity of reading it. Accept my affectionate salutations, and assurances of great esteem respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Feb. 24, 04
Washington
CÆsar A. Rodney
Rodney, CÆsar A.

TO CÆSAR A. RODNEY

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I receive with sincere grief your letter of the 21st and lament the necessity which calls for your retirement, if that necessity really exists. I had looked to you as one of those calculated to give cohesion to our rope of sand. You now see the composition of our public bodies, and how essential system and plan are for conducting our affairs wisely with so bitter a party in opposition to us, who look not at all to what is best for the public, but how they may thwart whatever we may propose, tho’ they should thereby sink their country. Talents in our public councils are at all times important; but perhaps there never was a moment when the loss of any would be more injurious than at the present. The condition of our affairs is advantageous. But it is also true that we are now under a crisis which is not without hazard from different quarters at home and abroad. But all this you understand perfectly, and if under such circumstances you withdraw I shall believe that the necessity which occasions it is imperious, and shall lament it most sincerely. Accept my affectionate salutations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
March 3, 1804
Washington
Elbridge Gerry
Gerry, Elbridge

TO ELBRIDGE GERRY

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—Altho’ it is long since I received your favor of Oct. 27, yet I have not had leisure sooner to acknolege it. In the middle Southern States, as great an union of sentiment has now taken place as is perhaps desirable. For as there will always be an opposition, I believe it had better be from avowed monarchists than republicans. New York seems to be in danger of republican division; Vermont is solidly with us; R. I. with us on anomalous grounds; N. H. on the verge of the republican shore; Connecticut advancing towards it very slowly, but with steady step; your State only uncertain of making port at all. I had forgotten Delaware, which will be always uncertain, from the divided character of her citizens. If the amendment of the Constitution passes R. I., (and we expect to hear in a day or two,) the election for the ensuing 4 years seems to present nothing formidable. I sincerely regret that the unbounded calumnies of the federal party have obliged me to throw myself on the verdict of my country for trial, my great desire having been to retire, at the end of the present term, to a life of tranquillity; and it was my decided purpose when I entered into office. They force my continuance. If we can keep the vessel of State as steadily in her course another 4 years, my earthly purposes will be accomplished, and I shall be free to enjoy, as you are doing, my family, my farm, my books. That your enjoiments may continue as long as you shall wish them, I sincerely pray, and tender you my friendly salutations, and assurances of great respect esteem.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Mar. 5, 1804
Washington
Col. Thomas Newton
Newton, Col. Thomas

TO COL. THOMAS NEWTON

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—We have just heard of the calamitous event of Norfolk. I have not heard whether any persons are named to receive donations for the relief of the poor sufferers, and therefore take the liberty of inclosing two hundred dollars to you, of asking the favor of you to have it applied in the way you think best, for the relief of such description of sufferers as you shall think best. I pray not to be named in newspapers on this occasion. Accept my friendly salutations assurances of respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
April 16, 1804
Monticello
Gideon Granger
Granger, Gideon

TO THE POSTMASTER-GENERAL (GIDEON GRANGER.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—In our last conversation you mentioned a federal scheme afloat, of forming a coalition between the federalists and republicans, of what they called the 7 Eastern States. The idea was new to me, and after time for reflection I had no opportunity of conversing with you again. The federalists know, that, eo nominie, they are gone forever. Their object, therefore, is, how to return into power under some other form. Undoubtedly they have but one means, which is to divide the republicans, join the minority, and barter with them for the cloak of their name. I say, join the minority; because the majority of the republicans not needing them, will not buy them. The minority, having no other means of ruling the majority, will give a price for auxiliaries, and that price must be principle. It is true that the federalists, needing their numbers also, must also give a price, and principle is the coin they must pay in. Thus a bastard system of federo-republicanism will rise on the ruins of the true principles of our revolution. And when this party is formed, who will constitute the majority of it, which majority is then to dictate? Certainly the federalists. Thus their proposition of putting themselves into gear with the republican minority, is exactly like Roger Sherman’s proposition to add Connecticut to Rhode island. The idea of forming 7 Eastern States is moreover clearly to form the basis of a separation of the Union. Is it possible that real republicans can be gulled by such a bait? for what? What do they wish that they have not? Federal measures? That is impossible. Republican measures? Have they them not? Can any one deny, that in all important questions of principle, republicanism prevails? But do they want that their individual will shall govern the majority? They may purchase the gratification of this unjust wish, for a little time, at a great price; but the federalists must not have the passions of other men, if, after getting thus into the seat of power, they suffer themselves to be governed by their minority. This minority may say, that whenever they relapse into their own principles, they will quit them, draw the seat from under them. They may quit them, indeed, but, in the meantime, all the venal will have become associated with them, will give them a majority sufficient to keep them in place, to enable them to eject the heterogeneous friends by whose aid they get again into power. I cannot believe any portion of real republicans will enter into this trap; and if they do, I do not believe they can carry with them the mass of their States, advancing so steadily as we see them, to an union of principle with their brethren. It will be found in this, as in all other similar cases, that crooked schemes will end by overwhelming their authors coadjutors in disgrace, and that he alone who walks strait upright, and who, in matters of opinion, will be contented that others should be as free as himself, acquiesce when his opinion is fairly overruled, will attain his object in the end. And that this may be the conduct of us all, I offer my sincere prayers, as well as for your health happiness.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Apr. 23, 04
Monticello
James Madison
Madison, James

TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE (JAMES MADISON.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I return by this mail the letters c. received with yours of the 15th. I think with you that a cordial answer should be given to Mr. Merry on the orders he communicated, altho’ they were merely the correction of an injustice. Would to god that nation would so far be just in her conduct, as that we might with honor give her that friendship it is so much our interest to bear her. She is now a living example that no nation however powerful, any more than an individual, can be unjust with impunity. Sooner or later public opinion, an instrument merely moral in the beginning, will find occasion physically to inflict it’s sentences on the unjust. Nothing else could have kept the other nations of Europe from relieving her under her present crisis. The lesson is useful to the weak as well as the strong.

On the 17th instant our hopes fears here took their ultimate form. I had originally intended to have left this towards the end of the present week. But a desire to see my family in a state of more composure before we separate will keep me somewhat longer. Still it is not probable I shall be here to answer any letter which leaves Washington after the 26th, because those of the succeeding post (the 30th) could not be answered till the 7th of May, when I may probably be on the road. Not having occasion to write to-day to the other heads of departments, will you be so good as to mention this to them? Accept my affectionate salutations.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
Apr. 27, 04
Monticello
Robert Smith
Smith, Robert

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY (ROBERT SMITH.)

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—I now return you the sentence of the court of inquiry in Morris’s case. What is the next step? I am not military jurist enough to say. But if it be a court marshal to try and pass the proper sentence on him, pray let it be done without delay while our captains are here. This opportunity of having a court should not be lost.

I have never been so mortified as at the conduct of our foreign functionaries on the loss of the Philadelphia. They appear to have supposed that we were all lost now, without resource: and they have hawked us in forma pauperis begging alms at every court in Europe. This self-degradation is the more unpardonable as, uninstructed unauthorized, they have taken measures which commit us by moral obligations which cannot be disavowed. The most serious of these is with the first consul of France, the Emperor of Russia Grand Seigneur. The interposition of the two first has been so prompt, so cordial, so energetic, that it is impossible for us to decline the good offices they have done us. From the virtuous warm-hearted character of the Emperor, and the energy he is using with the Ottoman Porte, I am really apprehensive that our squadron will, on it’s arrival, find our prisoners all restored. If this should be the case, it would be ungrateful and insulting to these three great powers, to chastise the friend (Tripoli) whom they had induced to do us voluntary justice. Our expedition will in that case be disarmed and our just desires of vengeance disappointed, and our honor prostrated. To anticipate these measures, and to strike our blow before they shall have had their effect, are additional cogent motives for getting off our squadron without a moment’s avoidable delay. At the same time it has now become necessary to decide before it goes, what is to be the line of conduct of the Commodore if he should find our prisoners restored. I shall be with you about this day fortnight. Should the frigates be ready to go before that, I must desire you to have a consultation of the heads of departments as to the instructions, and to give orders to the Commodore in conformity. I would wish at the same time a question to be taken whether the Commodore should not be instructed immediately on his arrival at his rendez-vous in the Mediterranean to send off at our expense the presents destined by Tripoli for the Grand Seigneur, and intercepted by us, with a letter from the Secretary of State to their analogous officer, who I believe is called the Reis effendi. I am not without hope Preble will have had the good sense to do this of his own accord. It’s effect will now be lessened, as it will be considered, not as spontaneous, but in consequence of what the Porte may have done on the interference of the Emperor of Russia. Accept my affectionate salutations assurances of attachment.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
May 26, 04
Washington
General John Armstrong
Armstrong, General John

TO GENERAL JOHN ARMSTRONG

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—We find it of advantage to the public to ask of those to whom appointments are proposed, if they are not accepted, to say nothing of the offer, at least for a convenient time. The refusal cheapens the estimation of the public appointments and renders them less acceptable to those to whom they are secondarily proposed. The occasion of this remark will be found in a letter you will receive from the Secretary of State proposing to you the appointment to Paris as successor to Chancellor Livingston. I write this private letter to remove some doubts which might perhaps arise in your mind. You have doubtless heard of the complaints of our foreign ministers as to the incompetency of their salaries. I believe it would be better were they somewhat enlarged. Yet a moment’s reflection will satisfy you that a man may live in any country on any scale he pleases, and more easily in that than this, because there the grades are more distinctly marked. From the ambassador there a certain degree of representation is expected. But the lower grades of Envoy, minister resident, Chargé, have been introduced to accommodate both the sovereign missionary as to the scale of expense. I can assure you from my own knowledge of the ground that these latter grades are left free in the opinion of the place to adopt any style they please, that it does not lessen their estimation or their usefulness. When I was at Paris two-thirds of the diplomatic men of the 2d and 3d orders entertained nobody. Yet they were as much invited out and honored as those of the same grades who entertained. I suspect from what I hear that the Chancellor having always stood on a line with those of the first expense here, has not had resolution enough to yield place there, that he has taken up the ambassadorial scale of expense. This procures one some sunshine friends who like to eat of your good things, but has no effect on the men of real business, the only men of real use to you, in a place where every man is estimated at what he really is. But this subject requires more detail than can be given but in conversation. If you accept, I think it will be necessary for you to come and pass some days here in reading the correspondence with the courts of Paris, London Madrid, that you may be fully possessed of the state of things on that side the water so far as they concern us. The Chancellor being extremely urging in his last letters to be immediately relieved, we are obliged to ask all the expedition in departure which is practicable. The state of affairs between us France as they respect St. Domingo is somewhat embarrassing urgent. Accept my friendly salutations assurances of great esteem respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
May 30, 04
Albert Gallatin
Gallatin, Albert

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY (ALBERT GALLATIN.)

j. mss.

Altho’ I know that it is best generally to assign no reason for a removal from office, yet there are also times when the declaration of a principle is advantageous. Such was the moment at which the New Haven letter appeared. It explained our principles to our friends, and they rallied to them. The public sentiment has taken a considerable stride since that, and seems to require that they should know again where we stand. I suggest therefore for your consideration, instead of the following passage in your letter to Bowen, “I think it due to candor at the same time to inform you, that I had for some time been determined to remove you from office, although a successor has not yet been appointed by the President, nor the precise time fixed for that purpose communicated to me;” to substitute this, “I think it due to candor at the same time to inform you, that the President considering that the patronage of public office should no longer be confided to one who uses it for active opposition to the national will, had, some time since, determined to place your office in other hands. But a successor not being yet fixed on, I am not able to name the precise time when it will take place.”

My own opinion is, that the declaration of this principle will meet the entire approbation of all moderate republicans, and will extort indulgence from the warmer ones. Seeing that we do not mean to leave arms in the hands of active enemies, they will care the less at our tolerance of the inactive. Nevertheless, if you are strongly of opinion against such a declaration, let the letter go as you had written it.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
June 11, 04
Washington
Thomas Leiper
Leiper, Thomas

TO THOMAS LEIPER

j. mss.
Dear Sir,

—A Mr. John Hill of Philadelphia asks of me whether Mr. Duane senr ever said in my presence “that the members of the St. Patrick’s society in Phila were all Federalists.” I do not know Mr. Hill, and the liberties which have been taken in publishing my letters renders it prudent not to commit them to persons whom I do not know, yet a desire never to be wanting to truth and justice makes me wish it to be known that Mr. Duane never did use such an expression or anything like it to me either verbally or in writing or any other way, nor utter a sentiment disrespectful of the society. I remember a considerable time ago to have had a letter from one of the society stating that such information they heard had been given me, but not saying by whom, which letter I immediately answered with an assurance that no such suggestion had ever been made to me. I cannot now recollect to whom the answer was given and therefore cannot turn to it. 1 Our friends in Philadelphia seem to have got into such a jumble of subdivision that not knowing how they stand individually, I have been at a loss to whom I should address this with a request to repeat verbally the substance of this declaration as on my authority but not letting the letter go out of his hands. I have concluded to ask that favor of you whose justice I am sure will induce you to give the assurance where it may contribute to justice, and whose friendship will excuse the trouble of this request. Accept my friendly salutations assurances of esteem respect.

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
June 13, 04
Washington
Mrs. John Adams
Adams, Mrs. John

TO MRS. JOHN ADAMS

j. mss.
Dear Madam,

—The affectionate sentiments which you have had the goodness to express in your letter of May 20, towards my dear departed daughter, have awakened in me sensibilities natural to the occasion, recalled your kindnesses to her, which I shall ever remember with gratitude friendship. I can assure you with truth, they had made an indelible impression on her mind, and that to the last, on our meetings after long separations, whether I had heard lately of you, and how you did, were among the earliest of her inquiries. In giving you this assurance I perform a sacred duty for her, at the same time, am thankful for the occasion furnished me, of expressing my regret that circumstances should have arisen, which have seemed to draw a line of separation between us. The friendship with which you honored me has ever been valued, and fully reciprocated; altho’ events have been passing which might be trying to some minds, I never believed yours to be of that kind, nor felt that my own was. Neither my estimate of your character, nor the esteem founded in that, have ever been lessened for a single moment, although doubts whether it would be acceptable may have forbidden manifestations of it.

Mr. Adams’s friendship mine began at an earlier date. It accompanied us thro’ long important scenes. The different conclusions we had drawn from our political reading reflections, were not permitted to lessen mutual esteem; each party being conscious they were the result of an honest conviction in the other. Like differences of opinion existing among our fellow citizens, attached them to one or the other of us, and produced a rivalship in their minds which did not exist in ours. We never stood in one another’s way; for if either had been withdrawn at any time, his favorers would not have gone over to the other, but would have sought for some one of homogeneous opinions. This consideration was sufficient to keep down all jealousy between us, to guard our friendship from any disturbance by sentiments of rivalship; and I can say with truth, that one act of Mr. Adams’s life, and one only, ever gave me a moment’s personal displeasure. I did consider his last appointments to office as personally unkind. They were from among my most ardent political enemies, from whom no faithful co-operation could ever be expected; and laid me under the embarrassment of acting thro’ men whose views were to defeat mine, or to encounter the odium of putting others in their places. It seemed but common justice to leave a successor free to act by instruments of his own choice. If my respect for him did not permit me to ascribe the whole blame to the influence of others, it left something for friendship to forgive, and after brooding over it for some little time, and not always resisting the expression of it, I forgave it cordially, and returned to the same state of esteem respect for him which had so long subsisted. Having come into life a little later than Mr. Adams, his career has preceded mine, as mine is followed by some other; and it will probably be closed at the same distance after him which time originally placed between us. I maintain for him, shall carry into private life, an uniform high measure of respect and good will and for yourself a sincere attachment.

I have thus, my dear Madam, opened myself to you without reserve, which I have long wished an opportunity of doing; and without knowing how it will be received, I feel relief from being unbosomed. And I have now only to entreat your forgiveness for this transition from a subject of domestic affliction, to one which seems of a different aspect. But tho’ connected with political events, it has been viewed by me most strongly in it’s unfortunate bearings on my private friendships. The injury these have sustained has been a heavy price for what has never given me equal pleasure. That you may both be favored with health, tranquillity and long life, is the prayer of one who tenders you the assurance of his highest consideration and esteem. 1

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 5, 04
James Madison
Madison, James

TO THE SECRETARY OF THE STATE. (JAMES MADISON.)

j. mss.

We did not collect the sense of our brethren the other day by regular questions, but as far as I could understand from what was said, it appeared to be,—1. That an acknolegment of our right to the Perdido, is a sine qua non, and no price to be given for it. 2. No absolute perpetual relinquishment of right is to [be] made of the country East of the Rio Bravo del Norte even in exchange for Florida. (I am not quite sure that this was the opinion of all.) It would be better to lengthen the term of years to any definite degree than to cede in perpetuity. 3. That a country may be laid off within which no further settlement shall be made by either party for a given time, say thirty years. This country to be from the North river eastwardly towards the Rio Colorado, or even to, but not beyond the Mexican or Sabine river. To whatever river it be extended, it might from its’ source run N. W., as the most eligible direction; but a due north line would produce no restraint that we should feel in 20 years. This relinquishment, 2 millions of Dollars, to be the price of all the Floridas East of the Perdido, or to be apportioned to whatever part they will cede.

But on entering into conferences, both parties should agree that, during their continuance, neither should strengthen their situation between the Iberville, Missipi Perdido, nor interrupt the navigation of the rivers therein. If they will not give such an order instantly, they should be told that we have for peace sake only, forborne till they could have time to give such an order, but that as soon as we receive notice of their refusal to give the order we shall enter into the exercise of our right of navigating the Mobile, protect it, and increase our force there pari passu with them. 1

Thomas Jefferson
Jefferson, Thomas
July 14. 04
James Madison
Madison, James

TO THE SECRETARY OF STATE (JAMES MADISON.)

mis. mss.

The inclosed reclamations of Girod Chote against the claims of Bapstropp to a monopoly of the Indian commerce supposed to be under the protection of the 3d article of the Louisiana Convention, as well as some other claims to abusive grants, will probably force us to meet that question. The article has been worded with remarkable caution on the part of our negociators. It is that the inhabitants shall be admitted as soon as possible, according to the principles of our Constn., to the enjoyment of all the rights of citizens, and, in the mean time, en attendant, shall be maintained in their liberty, property religion. That is that they shall continue under the protection of the treaty, until the principles of our constitution can be extended to them, when the protection of the treaty is to cease, and that of our own principles to take it’s place. But as this could not be done at once, it has been provided to be as soon as our rules will admit. Accordingly Congress has begun by extending about 20. particular laws by their titles, to Louisiana. Among these is the act concerning intercourse with the Indians, which establishes a system of commerce with them admitting no monopoly. That class of rights therefore are now taken from under the treaty placed under the principles of our laws. I imagine it will be necessary to express an opinion to Gov r . Claiborne on this subject, after you shall have made up one. Affect te . salutations.