Birth control must lead ultimately to a cleaner race.
Margaret Sanger.[1]
Anti-Life Philosophy.
We must fight to ensure that scientific progress and the right to
practice medicine in the best interest of our patients is not stifled
by the ideological perspectives of a few who would force their moral
views on the rest of the world.
Louise Tyrer, Vice-President of Medical
Affairs for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.[2]
It is criminal that the United States does not support international
research into new and improved methods of contraception more than it
does. The key to 'quality of life,' both on the international and
individual level, is fewer people through improved contraception.
Overview.
Nowhere is the mentality of "if we can do it, we must
do it" more evident than in the field of so-called reproductive
technology.
We have "progressed" from natural conception and family
planning to abortion pills, injectable abortifacients such as
Depo-Provera, the mixing of human sperm and eggs in glass dishes, and
disposable embryos.
However, this technology pales in comparison to the bizarre practices
being forecast for the next twenty years.
Sadly, it seems that man's greatest ingenuity is displayed in war war
against each other and war against our own fertility.
Future "Hopes."
Introduction.
Many of the future 'contraceptives' described below are true
abortifacients, and researchers and manufacturers are very proud of this
fact. What could be more effective at stopping births than surgical or
chemical abortion?
The moral aspects of fertility control are now simply been
disregarded as 'restrictive' the only thing that counts now is effectiveness.
Cervical Cap (Semi-Permanent)
A one-inch sphere of rubbery plastic held in place by cervical mucus,
equipped with a one-way valve that allows menstrual flow but blocks the
passage of sperm.
Diaphragm (Collagen Sponge)
Literally a spermicide-treated sponge that absorbs and attacks the
sperm.
"Herbal Remedies"
Various true abortifacients may be on the black market soon, based
upon those used by women in developing countries for centuries. There
are more than twenty known abortifacient "herbal remedies,"
all accompanied by side effects of varying scope and severity. Some of
these are so-called "emmenogogues," or menstruation-assisting
plants.
Hormone Injections
Depo-Provera, hailed by Planned Parenthood types as a 'panacea' for
birth control in undeveloped countries, is or has been banned in the
United States, Israel, Egypt, and other developed nations because of the
severe side effects it causes, including cervical cancer.
Depo-Provera is a true abortifacient, which primarily functions by
preventing implantation. Of course, such trash is perfectly suitable for
dumping on poor women in more than 80 other countries.
This vividly demonstrates just how much the pro-aborts really
care about the poor women they are always whining about.
Another 'promising' line of research is focused on Inhibin F, which
inhibits the production of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), which is
produced by the pituitary gland, and without which the woman's eggs do
not mature and are not released by the ovary.
Inhaler
Based upon the natural hormone LRH, this once-a-day nasal inhaler not
only inhibits ovulation, but menstruation as well. Possible severe side
effects have not yet been investigated.[3]
Intravaginal Ring
This is a plastic ring inserted into the vagina, which releases
progestogen (artificial progesterone) to prevent pregnancy.
Male Birth Control Pill
A male birth control pill has not yet been safely tested because of
the extremely high hormone levels required, and because sperm production
is continuous instead of cyclical.
Chinese doctors have produced a preliminary pill based upon gossypol,
an oil removed from cotton plants. However, the United State's
Population Council has shown that gossypol is extremely toxic, and a
search for a synthetic or derivative of the poison is ongoing.
Danazol, currently used to suppress uterine inflammation, has been
shown to suppress the production of the hormones LH and FSH in men,
decreasing sperm production (and the sex drive as well, forcing men to
dose up on testosterone as well). Large or continued doses of Danazol
can cause liver damage.[3]
Morning-After Pill
The current morning-after pills (euphemistically called "postcoital
contraceptives" by the Planned Parenthood people) are true
abortifacients which prevent or inhibit implantation.
Future morning-after pills may use a variant of prostaglandin, F2
Alpha, which would cause uterine contractions similar to those
experienced during labor. These pills would cause abortions to nine
weeks, just like the RU-486 pill now in production in France.
Another future morning-after pill may be based upon LHRBI, which
blocks the binding of luteinizing hormone (LH), which is essential for
the growth of a fertilized egg. In other words, LHRBI kills the woman's
eggs.
Silastic Implant
Siliconized elastic rods containing progestogen, implanted under the
woman's skin (tested on poor women in Brazil and Chile, of course),
slowly release the hormone into the bloodstream, interfering with
ovulation, changing the cervical mucus, and preventing implantation.
Effective for up to a decade after implantation, its side effects
include weight gain, skin irritation, ovarian cysts, and irregular
menstrual bleeding.
NORPLANT is an abortifacient of this type, and is described in more
detail in Chapter 33 of Volume II.
Spermicides (Improved)
Based upon NPGB, which attacks the enzyme in sperm that allows it to
penetrate and fertilize the egg. Could cause severe side effects if
absorbed into the bloodstream.
Testicle Warmer
Sperm must be stored at temperatures lower than normal body heat in
order to remain viable, hence the man's testicles hang away from his
body.
The Japanese are testing the contraceptive value of prolonged hot
baths and a heating device for the scrotum has been invented, giving a
new meaning to the popular phrase, "I'm hot for you, honey."
Ultrasound
Some people seriously think that ultrasound could be directed at the
man's testicles shortly before intercourse, thus killing most of his
sperm. How such a cumbersome procedure would interrupt foreplay has not
yet been addressed by researchers.
Vaccines
Since the population control cartel views pregnancy as a 'venereal
disease,' why not develop an injection to control it, just like many
other diseases? An 'anti-baby shot' would most likely take the form of
an antibody found in infertile women that would bind with the outer
covering of the woman's egg, making it impossible for sperm to penetrate
and fertilize it.
Another vaccine would immunize against the hormone HCG, which is
required for pregnancy preparation. Another injection would be based
upon a variant of LDH, an enzyme that causes the woman's body to treat
sperm like invading viruses.
A contraceptive vaccine for men would neutralize the hormone FSH,
making the sperm count too low to sustain fertility.[3]
The British medical journal Lancet reported in 1990 that only
one of 157 fertile couples became pregnant over one year period when the
man was injected weekly with testosterone enanthate (TE), an anabolic
steroid that signals the testes to stop sperm production.[4]
Vaginal Suppositories
These are also based upon prostaglandins, causing uterine
contractions which would end pregnancies to nine weeks. In other words,
this would be a so-called "quick and easy home abortion kit."
References: Future Contraceptive Technology.
[1] Margaret Sanger. Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New
York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.
[2] Louise B. Tyrer, M.D., Vice-President of Medical Affairs for the
Planned Parenthood Federation of America, New York. "Update on
RU-486." The American Journal of Gynecologic Health.
January/February 1989.
[3] David Wallechinsky and Amy and Irving Wallace. The Book of
Predictions. New York: William Morrow and Company, 1980. 513 pages.
[4] Judy Berlfein. "Birth-Control Technology Creeps Along."
The Oregonian, November 15, 1990, page B1.
Further Reading: Future Contraceptive Technology.
Greenhaven Press. Sexual Values: Opposing Viewpoints.
Greenhaven Press Opposing Viewpoints Series, Post Office Box 289009, San
Diego, California 92128-9009. 1983, 155 pages. Each section includes
several essays by leading authorities on both sides of each issue. The
questions asked are: "Is Nonmarital Sex Acceptable?;"
"Does Sex Education Belong in Schools?;" "Is
Homosexuality Acceptable?;" "Is Pornography Harmful?;"
and "Should Prostitution Be a Crime?" Authors include Jeremiah
A. Denton, Jr., Susan Brownmiller, Gail Sheehy, and Phyllis Schlafly. A
catalog is available from the above address and can be obtained by
calling 1-(800) 231-5163.
Roy O. Greep, Marjorie A. Koblinsky, and Frederick S. Jaffe. Reproduction
and Human Welfare: A Review of the Reproductive Sciences and
Contraceptive Development.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 1976, 620 pages. The
Ford Foundation sponsored three pro-abortion authors in the writing of
this lengthy book, which covers a lot of ground: The uses and limits of
contraceptive technology, the reproductive system, new contraceptive
technologies, research and training of contraceptive providers, the
financing of contraceptives, and a description of the moral and
political climate in the United States. Appendixes include country and
population control agency funding data.
© American Life League BBS — 1-703-659-7111
This is a chapter of the Pro-Life Activist’s Encyclopedia published
by American Life League.
|