AIDS, for some reason, is different. It is like a basilisk. Both
the public and the medical profession stare at it in fascination, but
seem unable to protect themselves.
Dr. Leon J. Podles.[1]
Anti-Life Philosophy.
AIDS is NOT a 'gay disease.' The Far Right has deliberately
exploited this plague to advance its reactionary agenda, and will stop
at nothing to drive gays and lesbians back 'into the closet.' A wide
range of people suffer from AIDS, and only a relatively small percentage
of worldwide cases are due to gay sex.
All people suffering from AIDS are entirely innocent, so it is
discriminatory and homophobic to refer to such an entity as an
"innocent" victim of AIDS.
Introduction.
Despite the best efforts of the homopropagandists in the so-called
'gay rights' movement, the AIDS plague will always be linked to
homosexuals in the public mind. AIDS originated with homosexuals, and
eighty percent of all new cases still occur in sodomites and bisexuals.
This chapter covers the basic aspects of the virus and shows how the
homosexual movement has virtually doomed itself with its fixation on
absolute individual privacy and privilege.
Glossary.
Know Your Terminology.
In order to intelligently discuss this disease, anti-"gay
rights" activists must be familiar with a number of basic technical
terms, as listed below.[2]
AIDS. Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. This is a disease
characterized by the presence of infections not normally found in
healthy people. The infections are caused by damage to the body's
autoimmune system by the virus known by the following names;
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus),
HTLV-III (Human T-Cell Lymphotropic Virus),
LAV (Lymphadenopathy Virus),
ARV (Aids Related Virus),
GRID (Gay-Related Immune Deficiency). The use of this
original name for the virus, and the slang "gay
cancer," were
quickly quashed by the homosexual-rights movement for
obvious public relations reasons.
Antibody. This is a substance produced by the body in
response to a viral infection. It often indicates that the immune
system has successfully resisted an infection and that the body is now
immune to the infection. Antibodies are formed against the HIV virus,
but their presence does not indicate immunity to HIV.
Antibody Test. This is a test used to screen the blood
supply for evidence of HTLV-III contaminated blood. The test measures
the presence or absence of antibodies to a virus, and is sometimes
erroneously referred to as the "AIDS test."
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) are used as an initial
indication of HIV, which is confirmed by Western Blot and fluorescent
antibody tests.
The HIV virus has been isolated from every human fluid, including
blood, cerebrospinal fluid, neural fluid, human milk, semen, cervical
secretions, saliva, urine, and tears.
ARC. Aids Related Complex. A condition that affects the
person with symptoms associated with AIDS, but with no opportunistic
infections.
Symptoms may include one or more of the following;
sudden loss of 10 percent or more of body weight without
dieting;
a fever of 100 degrees or more that persists for two weeks;
swollen glands in the neck, armpits, or groin;
drenching night sweat that persists for a month or more;
severe diarrhea that persists for three months or more, and
fatigue or malaise representing a significant change in energy
level.
These ARC symptoms must be unrelated to another disease or
condition. In many or most persons with ARC, the disease progresses to
AIDS. As of this time, according to medical and legal definitions, a
person with ARC does not technically have AIDS.
Clinically Diagnosed. A person who is judged by competent
medical personnel to have a certain disease or syndrome when such
condition lacks a definitive laboratory standard for infection.
Diagnosis is reached when certain signs and observable symptoms are
present. AIDS is such a clinically-diagnosed disease.
Immune System. This is the body system that defends against
external infections. The immune system has the ability to recognize
foreign materials or agents and can neutralize, eliminate, or
metabolize them with or without injury to the host's tissues.
Incubation Period. The time that passes between exposure to
a disease-causing agent and the onset of the symptoms that define
infection with the disease. According to current knowledge, the
incubation period for AIDS ranges from six months to five years.
Kaposi's Sarcoma. This is a type of cancer identified by
dark blue or purplish-brown nodules. This sarcoma is the second most
frequently diagnosed disease among persons infected with AIDS.
Lymphadenopathy. Swollen glands in the neck, throat, and
groin, frequently one of the early signs of AIDS infection.
Lymph Nodes. Oval structures distributed throughout the
body. During many infections, the lymph nodes enlarge and become
palpable, providing a useful symptom for diagnosis. Lymph nodes
circulate lymphocytes and filter foreign material from body fluids.
Lymphocytes. Cells that originate in the bone marrow and
pass through the bloodstream to enter other organs, where they are
modified into T- and B-lymphocytes.
Opportunistic Infections. A group of fungi, viruses,
parasites, and bacteria which infect a host whose immune system is
inhibited in some manner and cannot properly resist. These infections
are frequently the direct cause of death of AIDS-infected people.
Pneumocystic Carinii Pneumonia. PCP is caused by a protozoan
parasite, and generally does not cause an infection in a host whose
immune system is healthy. This organism is quite deadly for a person
with a depressed immune system, and is the most common bacteria
isolated in persons with AIDS.
T-Helper Cells. One of the subpopulations of T-lymphocytes
that aid in the cytotoxic, or killing, function of T-lymphocytes.
People with AIDS experience a lowering in the number of T-helper cells
and an inverted ratio of helper-to-suppressor cells.
The Supreme Power of the
"Right to Privacy."
Introduction.
The supreme law of the land is undoubtedly the right to privacy. It
has totally overshadowed the paramount right to life that God bestowed
upon every human being.
This privacy 'right' was used by the United States Supreme Court as
the legal basis for allowing artificial contraception for married
couples (Griswold v. Connecticut, 1965) and abortion on demand (Roe
v. Wade, 1973). The right to privacy has been used to deprive
thousands of handicapped newborns their very lives. Ultimately, the
'right to privacy' will be the weapon that allows euthanasia to become
widespread in our society.
One reason that homosexuals oppose any and all AIDS testing,
mandatory or otherwise, is that they can continue to deceive themselves
into thinking that they do not have the disease in the absence of hard
proof that they do have it. Thus, they can continue to engage in
unlimited sexual promiscuity, and disregard the danger to others in
"good conscience."
Garbage In, Garbage Out.
No effective public health effort can occur in the total absence of
reliable epidemiological data on AIDS. Every effort made to trace the
spread of the disease by identifying sexual 'partners' has been
viciously attacked by homosexuals as "scapegoating."
Therefore, under current privacy laws, no epidemiological statistic is
reliable and researchers must base their work on guesses regarding
statistics and trends.
Incredibly, sodomite activists even tried to stop blood screening for
AIDS in 1983 on the grounds that it was, according to the lofty opinion
of the National Gay Task Force, "scapegoating" and
"stigmatizing!"[3] In fact, a blood bank still collects blood
in the Castro District of San Francisco, which has the highest density
of AIDS carriers in the country, in order not to offend sodomites.
No reputable researcher can possibly hope to achieve meaningful
results under such conditions. The result instead is futility: i.e.,
"garbage in, garbage out." As long as researchers only possess
information on those persons who have died of AIDS, their most
current information is at least five years out of date.
Because homosexuals participate in activities that are utterly
revolting to the public, the 'right' to privacy is tailor-made for the
'gays' to advance their perverted agenda. Although there are hundreds of
examples of this kind of skulduggery, several instances stand out, as
described below.
The "Columbus of AIDS."
Ironically, the "right to privacy" contributed heavily to
the 'jump-starting' of the AIDS epidemic in the United States.
According to Randy Shilts in his book And the Band Played On,
the person responsible for bringing the AIDS virus to the United States
was the French-Canadian airline steward Gaetan Dugas. Dugas had picked
up the virus in Europe by having sex with Africans and, extensively
using his airline travel privileges, proceeded to spread AIDS from San
Francisco to New York City.
It is estimated that he had sex with at least three thousand men, and
his sexual activity did not slow down a bit after he was diagnosed with
the AIDS virus in 1980. Dugas justified his continuing sodomy with the
excuse that he was free to do what he wanted to with his own body.
When he was in the final stages of AIDS, he would have anonymous sex
with men in homosexual bathhouses, and then show his sexual partners his
purple Kaposi's Sarcoma blotches, saying "Gay cancer. Maybe you'll
get it."[4]
Dugas, labeled "patient zero" by health care authorities,
died of AIDS in 1984.
It is very interesting to note that the homosexual strategists
attempted to dilute their responsibility for the disease by first
successfully quashing the name GRID (gay-related immune deficiency), and
then expanding the list of "victims" into the so-called
"4-H Club:" Haitians, hemophiliacs, heroin users, and
homosexuals (notice who is last on the list).
Eventually, the sodomites recognized that they could divert blame for
the disease entirely by focussing attention on true victims like
Romanian infants and Ryan White.
A Genuine Victim.
We hear much homosexual propaganda about how everyone should care for
AIDS sufferers, but this phony facade slipped a little when the
sodomites demonstrated nothing but contempt and hate towards a genuinely
innocent AIDS victim Kimberly Bergalis.
Bergalis was a 22-year old woman who was a virgin, but had contracted
AIDS from her dentist, Jeffrey Acer. She was enraged because she
believed the propaganda that there was "absolutely no way" to
contract the disease from health-care workers, so she began a crusade in
support of mandatory AIDS testing for them.
In September of 1991, Bergalis testified before Congress in support
of mandatory testing. She was originally scheduled to testify on the
12th of the month. Rabid pro-abortion and pro-homosexual Congressman
Henry Waxman (D.-umb) knew that her testimony would damage the sodomite
movement, and also knew that Bergalis was near death. So he rescheduled
her testimony for an indefinite later date, saying that he could not
"find a room" for her. He obviously hoped that she would die
before the reschedule date.[5]
Eventually, she got to testify in favor of mandatory health-care
worker testing for a grand total of 30 seconds.
Meanwhile, the homosexuals heaped abuse on her, calling her, among
other things, "bigot," "irrational," "filled
with hate," and "fear monger."[5]
These are the same 'loving and nonjudgmental' "gays" we
hear so much about.
AIDS: Not an STD.
AIDS precisely fits every portion of the classical medical
description of a sexually-transmitted disease (STD). However, a New York
State Supreme Court justice recently declared that AIDS and HIV are not
sexually-transmitted diseases.[6] This is because New York public health
workers are permitted to test for STDs and can attempt to contact sexual
partners of the infected person if the results are positive. Gonorrhea
and syphilis have been in this category for many years. However, the
homosexuals didn't like this exposure, and lobbied for special AIDS
protection, claiming as they always do that any unfavorable actions
against AIDS would drive AIDS 'sufferers' underground.
Insurance Panic.
In 1985, the District of Columbia caved in to homosexual pressure and
adopted an ordinance that prohibited insurance companies from testing
prospective applicants for AIDS antibodies or asking any questions
whatever about their sexual orientation during the insurance application
process. Within twelve months, 41 of the 50 insurance companies doing
business in DC quit the area.[7] Prices skyrocketed and what had been a
very wide range of insurance choices was suddenly and drastically
constricted. Naturally, insurance premiums instantly skyrocketed by more
than 50 percent, leaving thousands who could not pay without life
insurance.
There was utterly no concern shown by the homosexuals for these
victims of their campaign.
Under such conditions, court-ordered confidentiality allows almost
unlimited opportunity for homosexuals and other with AIDS to defraud
insurance companies. A comprehensive study revealed that 44 percent of
those with AIDS took out life insurance policies within two years of
death, compared with 8 percent of those who died of all other accidental
and natural causes.[7]
The Threat to Health Professionals.
In California, the homosexual lobby has taken the quest for absolute
privacy to a life-endangering extreme. A doctor cannot even inform
another doctor that a referred patient has AIDS under pain of losing his
license to practice. Doctors cannot tell their nurses or any other
health care professional that their patients have AIDS. A doctor cannot
even tell the person's wife that he has AIDS, thereby directly
endangering her life in the name of Almighty Privacy![8]
The Threat to Spouses.
Most local and state health departments vigorously oppose mandatory
premarital screening in order to preserve privacy, although this is a
certain death sentence to a woman who marries a man with AIDS, and a
death sentence for all or most of her children, as well.
Where There Is No Privacy.
By contrast, it is interesting to review the situation in the former
Soviet Union, which had the toughest AIDS laws in the world. The
responsibility and consequences for homosexual activity rested solely
upon the individual.
A person who contracted the HIV virus received an automatic five-year
prison sentence for "having perverted sexual relations,"
unless it could be shown that he contracted the disease from blood
products. If the person actually transmitted the virus to another
person, the prison sentence was increased to eight years.
Soviet police had the authority to apprehend any suspected homosexual
and have him forcibly tested for AIDS. According to the Liberty
Report, a majority of Soviet researchers said that they would
deliberately slow down their work in search of an AIDS cure so that
homosexuals, prostitutes, and drug addicts could "be
eliminated."
It is amusing that so many homosexuals in the United States support
Communism. This is one perversion that is instantly and ruthlessly
crushed when the "Revolution" has taken place, as outlined on
page 77 of the Revolutionary Communist Party's New Programme in
best jargonistic style; "As for homosexuality, this too is
perpetuated and fostered by the decay of capitalism, especially as it
sinks into deeper crisis ... Education will be conducted throughout
society on the ideology behind homosexuality and its material roots in
exploiting society and struggle will be waged to eliminate it and reform
homosexuals."
The Communists, as they have demonstrated so many times in the past,
have two types of "reform;" individual counseling (execution
by rifle) or group therapy (execution by machine gun).
AIDS and Euthanasia.
On Christianity and Isolation.
Darwin's process of natural selection is operating in a truly naked
and overt manner now. Intelligence is no longer a survival trait.
Neither are trendiness or conformity. Only chastity, monogamy, and
common sense will contribute to our survival. If AIDS is truly a
"species-threatening" disease, as some so-called 'gays'
allege, only those groups isolated from "mainstream America"
by traditional morality will be protected to any effective degree.
Therefore, the implications of the AIDS virus for euthanasia are (or
should be) literally terrifying to homosexuals. They are a subclass of
people who are still considered undesirable by most Americans despite
the torrent of media hype and propaganda. They are a group of people who
engage in unnatural and reprehensible practices.
Sodomites are concentrated in what society perceives to be
'nonessential' professions (hairdressers, artists, designers, lawyers,
food handlers, etc.) and have few or no children or other dependents.
Furthermore, AIDS patients are an extreme drain on the health care
system, particularly in their last year of life. Finally, and perhaps
most importantly, homosexuals believe very strongly in
self-determination, and have no particular desire to prolong a life that
has lost its 'quality.'
AIDS Dementia.
This attitude was quantified by Dr. Peter Marzuk of Cornell
University Medical School's Psychiatry Department, who found that male
AIDS patients aged 20 to 59 commit suicide 36 times more often than
other men in their age group and 66 times more frequently than the
general population. He stated that "We're seeing the same high
rates of suicides by AIDS patients that we see among patients with
serious mental disorders." The study, reported in the Journal of
the American Medical Association (JAMA), said "At some point,
the AIDS virus can involve a patient's central nervous system and
produce mental disorders, such as dementia, paranoia, depression,
psychoses and delirium, all of which have been associated with higher
suicide rates."[9]
Another comprehensive study found that at least 80 percent of adults
with AIDS will eventually suffer from "AIDS dementia"
personality changes, depression, extreme paranoia, and neuromuscular
defects.[10]
Euthanasia Target.
The euthanasia movement literally could not ask for a better
"test and target" group: Militant homosexual activists, who
are loud, obnoxious, selfish, occupy peripheral occupations, and are
generally despised by the public.
Figures 122-1 and 122-2 show that the number of persons who have died
of AIDS and related complications is now more than twice as large as the
total number of servicemen our country lost in Vietnam.
FIGURE 122-1
HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED UNITED STATES AIDS DEATHS, 1979-1992
[A medium text size on your computer's 'view'
setting is recommended, otherwise, the tables may be discombobulated.]
AIDS Deaths
Percent
AIDS Cases
Caused by
Annual
Annual Homosexual
Year
New* Total
Increase
New* Total
Increase Behavior
1979
10
10
5
5 100%
1980
80
90
700%
45
50
800% 98%
1981
250
340
210%
124
174
180% 97%
1982
503
843
100%
630
804
400% 95%
1983
2,221
3,064
340%
1,475
2,279
130% 88%
1984
4,635
7,699
110%
2,330
4,609
60% 77%
1985
8,249
15,948
80%
3,673
8,282
60% 69%
1986
13,055
29,003
60%
5,967
14,249
90% 67%
1987
20,740
49,743
60%
11,182
25,431
60% 66%
1988
32,933
82,676
60%
19,886
45,317
80% 65%
1989 52,700
135,376
60%
24,264
69,581
60% 63%
1990 84,300
219,676
60% 31,196
100,777
60% 61%
1991 134,900
354,576
60% 46,800
147,600
60% 60%
1992 215,800
570,376
60% 70,200
217,800
60% 60%
1993 300,000
870,000
60% 98,000
315,800
60% 60%
NOTES.
* Figures for 1979, 1980, and 1981 are estimates. It is assumed
that the spread of AIDS and deaths resulting from AIDS-related
complications will continue to increase at a uniform rate for a short
period of time into the future. Therefore, future statistics are based
upon the average historical rate for the last several years. This
assumption is considered valid in light of the fact that the virus
still affects only a small part of the 'target' population homosexual
males and therefore has not yet encountered epidemiological limits in
terms of target population saturation.
** According to the Centers for Disease Control, new AIDS cases in
1990 were distributed as follows: homosexual or bisexual men, 66%;
drug addicts, 16%; homosexual/bisexual men who are also drug addicts,
8%; hemophiliacs, 1%; heterosexuals 4%; and undetermined categories,
5%.
FIGURE 122-2
HISTORICAL AND PROJECTED CUMULATIVE UNITED STATES AIDS DEATHS 1979
TO 1993
[Because some graphics were lost in this file's conversion from
text documentation, we are only able to provide roughly estimated
figures for the following table, the original of which can be found in
the American Life Leagues Pro-life Encyclopedia.]
CUMULATIVE
YEAR AIDS DEATHS
1982
8,000
1983
10,000
1984
12,000
1985
15,000
1986
20,000
1987
35,000
1988
50,000
1989
80,000
1990
120,000
1991
160,000
1992
220,000
1993
320,000
Our Salvation: King Kondom?
Prescription for Doom.
One outstanding feature of the AIDS panic is the fanatical way that
the Planned Parenthood types insist that "safe sex" is still
possible in the face of this menace.
Their prescription for "safe sex" is almost always condoms.
AIDS Transmission Rates.
The February 6, 1987 issue of the Journal of the American Medical
Association dealt with a study of AIDS transmission between infected
and uninfected sexual partners.[11] The study included 32 heterosexual
couples, each of which included one infected male and one noninfected
female. After a period of from one to three years, the following rates
of AIDS transmission were noted;
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CONDOM USE AND AIDS TRANSMISSION
12 of 14 women not using condoms were
infected
(86%)
3 of 10 women using condoms consistently were
infected (30%)
0 of 8 women abstaining from sex were
infected
(0%)
Condoms Don't Do the Job.
The most significant result of this study is that consistent condom
use does not prevent AIDS transmission. In a period of three
years, infected partners transmitted the AIDS virus to their spouses at
an annual rate of 11.2 percent. This means that, during a period of six
years, more than half of the uninfected partners of AIDS patients will
become infected themselves despite 100% use of condoms.
According to virtually every source, the failure rate for condoms
during anal sex is approximately three times that for
heterosexual intercourse, because of the very heavy stresses placed on
the material of the condom. This results in the following rates of AIDS
transmission for anal and natural sex;
PROBABILITY OF AIDS TRANSMISSION WITH CONDOM USE DURING ANAL AND
NORMAL SEX
Average Rate of AIDS Transmission
When Condoms Are Used for;
Time
Natural
Sex
Anal Sex
1
year
11
percent
30 percent
2
years
21
percent
51 percent
3
years
30
percent
66 percent
4
years
38
percent
76 percent
5
years
45
percent
83 percent
10
years
70
percent
97 percent
In view of the extremely long latent period for AIDS (and the many
sexual partners that homosexuals have), these statistics should be
frightening to all sexually active homosexuals who think they are safe
with condoms.
The "Safe(r) Sex" Myth.
"Safe(r) sex" is a dangerous myth. Virtually any kind of
contact with an AIDS carrier carries some definite risk, because the
people who come in contact with them will probably not be aware that
they have the virus and will probably be ignorant of the many factors
that can aid the transmission of the virus.
For example, even passionate kissing does not qualify as "safe(r)
sex." Researchers at the Infectious Disease Clinic in Naples,
Italy, have found that the fragility of the mouth's mucus membranes make
it possible to transmit HIV by passionate kissing and by sharing
toothbrushes. Even "safe(r) sex" brochures distributed by
sodomite groups warn against "French kissing."
Page 25 of Surgeon General C. Everett Koop's Report on Acquired
Immune Deficiency Syndrome assured the public that, "Although
the AIDS virus has been found in tears and saliva, no instance of
transmission from these body fluids has been reported." This was in
spite of a report by the British medical journal Lancet as far
back as 1984 that a man had transmitted AIDS to his wife through his
saliva.[12]
A second case of non-sexual AIDS transmission was reported by the
September 20, 1986 Lancet more than a month before Koop's report
was released. Harvard Medical School's Dr. William Haseltine said that
"Anyone who tells you categorically that AIDS is not contracted by
saliva is not telling you the truth."[13]
Koop's Report also states on page 22 that "There is no
danger of AIDS-virus infection from visiting a doctor, dentist,
hospital, hairdresser, or beautician ... " In July of 1991,
Congress debated a mandatory AIDS-reporting bill for infected medical
professionals, because at least five persons had been infected through
this route, including Kimberly Bergalis, whose case is described above.
Money Spent On AIDS.
A death is a death. We are getting less return for the money than
if we left it in the research of cancer and other diseases. People
will die of those diseases because of the shifting of money to AIDS.
We will never know their names, and no one will ever knit them a quilt
or block the Golden Gate Bridge for them.
Michael Fumento.[14]
Homosexual Complaints.
Much to the disgust of the general public, the homosexual lobby
repeatedly accuses the government of so-called "AIDS
genocide," and asserts that the Feds "have blood on their
hands." This attitude is in keeping with the sodomite's compelling
need to shift the blame for their sorry predicament onto anyone
other than themselves.
In perhaps the most extreme statement of self-excusal, Harry Hay,
founder of the first homosexual organization in the United States (The
Mattachine Society) accused Ronald Reagan of developing and spreading
the AIDS virus. Hay claimed that "I share with many people the
secret, sneaking sensation that, on one level or another, it [AIDS] may
have been introduced by reckless Republican reactionaries of the stripe
of Ronald Reagan. Not Reagan himself he's too stupid."[15]
Hay didn't comment on the fact that Reagan, as "stupid" as
he was alleged to be, managed to avoid contracting the AIDS virus
himself, unlike many of Hay's friends.
The facts show that Federal expenditures on AIDS research, education
and prevention are much greater than that for heart disease or cancer,
even though the latter diseases cause many more deaths.
One indicator of the priorities our country sets on health care is
the amount of money spent on disease prevention relative to the impact
that disease has on the general population in terms of deaths, days of
sickness, and other measures.
AIDS now claims an extremely high and disproportionate share of
limited research and preventions funds. Annual expenditures per death
for AIDS are now 48 times that for heart disease and 23 times that for
cancer, as shown below.
COMPARATIVE FEDERAL EXPENDITURES FOR AIDS, HEART DISEASE, AND
CANCER
Annual
1989 Federal
Disease
Deaths
Expenditures
Heart
disease
770,000
$1.0 billion
All
cancers
500,000
$1.4 billion
Diabetes
36,000
$295 million
Alzheimer's
100,000
$243 million
AIDS
35,000
$2.2 BILLION
Expenditures
Per Death
Heart
disease
$1,300
All
cancers
$2,800
Alzheimer's
$2,430
Diabetes
$8,200
AIDS
$63,000
NOTE: These figures do not include the substantial amount of
money spent on income subsidies for patients and for direct patient
care.
Reference. Max Gates, Newhouse News Service.
"Federal Spending on AIDS Near Sum Spent for Cancer." The
Oregonian, June 15, 1989, page E3. Also Congressional Research
Service, Library of Congress.
Total spending on AIDS from all Federal, state, local and private
sources in 1989 was $4.4 billion, about one percent of the total $542
billion spent on health care in that year. Figure 122-3 shows the
history of Federal government AIDS expenditures.
FIGURE 121-3
ANNUAL FEDERAL EXPENDITURES FOR AIDS EDUCATION, RESEARCH, AND PREVENTION
(all figures in $millions)
Education and
Medical
Cash Annual
Year
Research
Prevention
Care
Assistance Total
1982
3
2
0
0
5
1983
22
7
15
0
44
1984
59
4
35
6
104
1985
86
25
83
13
207
1986
204
73
199
33
509
1987
345
172
331
51
899
1988
626
354
380
88
1,448
1989
856
450
751
138
2,195
TOTALS
2,201
1,087
1,794
329
5,411
Note. These figures refer to Federal AIDS expenditures only.
They do not include state, local, and private expenditures, which are at
least equal to the above figures.
Reference. William Winkenwerder, M.D.,
Austin R. Kessler, M.B.A., and Rhonda M. Stolic, B.S.E.. New England
Journal of Medicine. Subject of an Associated Press article in the
June 15, 1989 issue of The Oregonian, page E3, entitled
"Federal Spending on AIDS Near Sum Spent On Cancer."
All of this shows the power of the homosexual lobby as it greedily
consumes all the money it can for its very small percentage of the
population, thereby depriving others of badly-needed assistance and
doing very little to amend its own very efficient disease-generating
behavior.
Christopher H. Foreman, a political analyst with the Brookings
Foundation, says that the sodomite demands for unlimited AIDS money
constitute "... a remarkably successful lobby. In an era of
diminished budgetary resources, many other things in the public health
sector will not get money."[14]
Other Diseases in
Homosexuals.
I've had over 1,000 sexual partners. I forget where my thought's
gone ... I've had gonorrhea probably 40 times, and I've had syphilis
about four or five times.
Homosexual actor Douglas Lambert.[16]
Promiscuous Sexual Addicts.
A 1982 study by the Atlanta Centers for Disease Control showed that
homosexual men infected with the AIDS virus had committed sodomy with an
average of 1,000 different partners. A study of San Francisco
homosexuals revealed that 98 percent of homosexuals have had sex with
more than 50 other men, and 28 percent have had sex with more than one
thousand other men.
"Unsafe Sex" Is Still the Norm.
By 1984, the fear of AIDS had lowered these rates considerably. An
American Psychological Society study was quoted in the November 21, 1984
USA Today, concluding that homosexuals had lowered their sodomy
rate from 70 different partners a year in 1980 to "only" 50
different partners a year in 1984.
A 1989 survey of 823 Los Angeles homosexuals revealed that nearly
two-thirds (64 percent) had had "unsafe sex" during the
previous two months. Of these, 51 percent of all homosexuals testing HIV
positive still practiced "unsafe sex." Of all respondents, 17
percent had engaged in "possibly unsafe sex;" and only 19
percent had practiced "safe sex" at all times during the
previous two months.[17]
AIDS-infected homosexual Wally Hansen of San Francisco revealed the
utterly selfish character of the typical promiscuous sodomite's
personality when he described why he doesn't use a condom or notify his
'partners' that he has the AIDS virus: "It basically comes down to
what you think it's worth. I can only think positively. I do anything I
want. I feel like I'd do more damage to myself by stressing my system
out of worry."[18]
Epidemiologist Dr. Robert C. Noble confirmed this callous disregard
for the lives of others when he described a conversation he had with
another AIDS-infected homosexual; "At our place [University of
Kentucky Medical School] we were taking care of a guy with AIDS who is
back visiting the bars and having sex. 'Well, did your partner use a
condom?' I asked. 'Did you tell him that you're infected with the
virus?' 'Oh, no, Dr. Noble,' he replied, 'it would have broken the
mood.'"[19]
And a homosexual radio spokesperson summed it all up when he said
that "In 1981 we drew back and became more sexually conservative
because of fear of the AIDS epidemic. Now we have decided that certain
death is preferable to dull sex lives."[20]
This uncontrollably promiscuous conduct in the face of certain
infection by various painful and incurable venereal diseases and
possible infection by the fatal AIDS shows that homosexuals are truly
addicted to their sexual practices, as described in Chapter 116,
"The Homosexual Orientation."
The (Un)natural Result of Promiscuity.
Figure 122-4 shows the logical results of this extreme and compulsive
promiscuity. The average promiscuous homosexual carries two
venereal diseases and at least three other diseases. FIGURE 122-4
Relative incidence of
sexually transmitted diseases among homosexual men as compared to the
general male population in the United States.
AID'S
171 times more likely
Syphilis
14 times more likely
Hepatitis
8 times more likely
Scabies
5 times more likely
Gonorrhea 3 times more
likely
Genital Warts 3 times more likely
Lice
3 times more likely
References. H.W. Jaffe and C. Keewhan, et.al.
"National Case-Control Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Pneumocystis
Carinii Pneumonia in Homosexual Men; Part I, Epidemiological
Results." Annals of Internal Medicine, February 1983, pages
145 to 157. H.H. Hansfield. "Sexually Transmitted Disease in
Homosexual Men." American Journal of Public Health.
September 1981, pages 989 amd 990. Karla Jay and Allen Young. The Gay
Report. New York City: Summit Publishers, 1979. Janet E. Gans, et.al.
"America's Adolescents: How Healthy Are They?" Journal of
the American Medical Association, January 1990, page 31.
Hepatitis A, amebiasis, shigellosis and giardiasis are so prevalent
among sodomites that they are collectively known to physicians as
"gay bowel syndrome." In San Francisco, "the gay capital
of the world," 80 percent of the people who visit the city's
venereal disease clinics are homosexuals. 20 percent of these patients
suffer from deadly and painful rectal gonorrhea.[17]
It is interesting to note the impact that pro-homosexual laws have on
the local VD rates. During the first decade the San Francisco homosexual
rights law was in effect, Hepatitis A rose 100 percent; infectious
Hepatitis B escalated 300 percent; and amoebic colon infections exploded
by an incredible 2,500 percent.[17] And when these epidemics overload
and overwhelm these city's health care systems, you can bet that they
will be the first to scream for federal aid.
Homosexual men are by no means alone in their diseases; homosexual
women ('lesbians') are 19 times more likely to have had syphilis than
normal women; 2 times more likely to have had genital warts; 4 times
more likely to have had scabies; 7 times more likely to have had an
infection from vaginal contact; 29 times more likely to have had an
infection from oral-vaginal contact; and 12 times more likely to have
had an infection caused by penile contact.[21]
As professor Jerome Lejeune of Descartes University, Paris, says of
AIDS: "Only God can truly pardon the one who violates His laws; man
pardons at times; Nature never pardons at all: She is not a
person."[22]
References: AIDS.
[1] Dr. Leon J. Podles. "Whom the Gods Would Destroy, They First
Make Mad." Fidelity Magazine, October 1987. Page 20.
[2] "Glossary," New York Gay Men's Health Crisis. Also,
"Glossary," Engage/Social Action, United Methodist
Church, Washington, DC, February 1986, page 8.
[3] Journal of the American Medical Association, February 4,
1983. Also described in New Dimensions Magazine, March 1990.***
[4] "The Columbus of AIDS." National Review,
November 6, 1987, page 19.
[5] W. Shephard Smith, Jr. "The Politics of AIDS." Reprint
offered by the American Family Association, Post Office Drawer 2440,
Tupelo, Mississippi 38803. Also see Malcolm Gladwell, LA
Times-Washington Post Service. "Last Crusade for Bergalis Set
to Begin." The Oregonian, September 26, 1991, page A3.
[6] Mona Charen. "There's Poison Here All Right!" American
Family Association Journal, February 1989, page 12.
[7] K. Clifford. "Insurance Attorney Alleges Fraud With AIDS
Coverage." American Medical Association News, May 8, 1987,
page 2. Also described in Father Richard Butler, O.P. "Are They
Really "Gay?"" Fidelity Magazine, October 1987,
page 12.
[8] Senator H.L. Richardson of the California State Assembly.
"AIDS Deadly Disease With Civil Rights." National Federation
for Decency Journal, August 1987, page 13.
[9] News of Interest. "AIDS Suicide Rates Higher." American
Family Association Journal, August 1988, page 17.
[10] M. Dalakas, et.al. "AIDS and the Nervous System." Journal
of the American Medical Association, 261:2,396, 1989.
[11] James G. Bruen, Jr. "Koop de Theatre." Fidelity
Magazine, April 1987, page 15.
[12] C. Everett Koop, M.D., Sc.D. The Surgeon General's Report on
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. United States Department of
Health and Human Services, 1986, 36 pages. Free to the public. Reviewed
by Wayne Lutton on pages 54 to 56 of the January 30, 1987 issue of National
Review.
[13] Dr. William Haseltine of Harvard Medical School, quoted in the
March 18, 1986 issue of the New York Times.
[14] Michael Fumento, author of The Myth of Heterosexual AIDS.
Quoted in Alan K. Ota. "Outing." The Oregonian, June
24, 1990, page M1.
[15] Harry Hay, quoted in Outweek Magazine, June 27, 1990,
page 95.
[16] Homosexual actor Douglas Lambert, who died of AIDS in December
1986, quoted in the Toronto Daily Sun of March 1, 1987. Also
quoted in a letter to Fidelity Magazine by James H. Cotter of
Barrie, Ontario, April 1987, page 9.
[17] Brad Hayton and John Eldredge. "Homosexual Rights: What's
Wrong?" Focus on the Family Citizen, March 18, 1991, pages 6
to 8. Also see Joyce Price. "High-Risk Sex Acts Still Common Among
Gays, Bisexuals." Washington Times, December 28, 1989.
[18] AIDS-infected homosexual Wally Hansen of San Francisco, Barbara
Kantrowitz et.al. "Teenagers and AIDS." Newsweek
Magazine, August 3, 1992, pages 45 to 49.
[19] Robert C. Noble, M.D. "There is No Safe Sex." Newsweek
Magazine, April 1, 1991, page 8.
[20] David A. Noebel, Wayne C. Lutton, and Paul Cameron. AIDS:
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome. Summit Ministries Research
Center, Manitou Springs, Colorado, 80829. 1985, 149 pages. Reviewed by
Chilton Williamson, Jr. on page 58 of the April 11, 1986 issue of National
Review. A review of the literature that has been written about AIDS,
and an examination of the tactics used by homosexuals to take advantage
of the plague to further their own goals.
[21] H.J. Jaffe and C. Keewhan, et.al "National
Case-Control Study of Kaposi's Sarcoma and Pneumocystic Carinii
Pneumonia in Homosexual Men; Part 1, Epidemiological Results." Annals
of Internal Medicine, 1983, 99(2), pages 145 to 157.
[22] "Tromperie Sur L'Amour." The Religion & Society
Report, January 1990, page 3.
Further Reading: AIDS.
Gene Antonio. The AIDS Cover-Up?: The Real and Alarming Facts
About AIDS.
270 pages. Order from Ignatius Press, 15 Oakland Avenue, Harrison,
New York 10528. This book presents the true nature of AIDS, free of
media glamorization and euphemisms. What danger does it pose? How is it
really transmitted? How safe are we? All material is documented from
primary medical sources and is unassailable.
Paul Cameron. Exposing the AIDS Scandal.
Huntington House Publishers, Post Office Box 53788, Lafayette,
Louisiana 70505. 1988, 151 pages. The author, who is universally hated
by homosexuals because he pulls no punches, certainly does not do so in
this book, which blasts C. Everett Koop, a cowardly government, and the
sodomites themselves. Cameron also reveals the magnitude of the AIDS
threat and describes how current policies help to spread instead of
retard the disease.
Nancy Dubler and David Nimmons. Ethics on Call: A Medical
Ethicist Shows How to Take Charge of Life-and-Death Choices.
Harmony Books, 210 East 50th Street, New York, New York 10022. 1992,
405 pages. Reviewed on page 2,819 of the May 27, 1992 issue of the Journal
of the American Medical Association. A revealing look at the
day-to-day decisions that go on in a large hospital. The author, who has
advised medical personnel on many occasions, describes specific cases,
including passive euthanasia, making critical decisions for newborns,
notification of a person whose spouse tests HIV-positive, and questions
of sustained care. The author also examines the agendas, habits, and
"circles of consent" that interact in such decisions.
Victor Gong, M.D., and Norman Rudnick (editors). AIDS Facts and
Issues.
New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 1987, 390 pages. A book
from a "neutral" perspective (i.e., mildly pro-homosexual)
that addresses the major components of the ethical and practical
dimensions of the AIDS "epidemic:" The clinical spectrum,
at-risk groups, our response to AIDS, and research and avoidance of
AIDS.
Greenhaven Press. AIDS: Opposing Viewpoints.
Greenhaven Press Opposing Viewpoints Series, Post Office Box 289009, San
Diego, California 92128-9009. 1988, 223 pages. Each section includes
several essays by leading authorities on both sides of each issue. The
questions asked are: "How Serious is AIDS?;" "How Can
AIDS Be Controlled?;" "Will Controlling AIDS Undermine Civil
Rights?;" "Is the Government's Response to AIDS
Adequate?;" and "How Will AIDS Affect Society?" Authors
include Surgeon General C. Everett Koop and Congressman William E.
Dannemeyer. A catalog is available from the above address and can be
obtained by calling 1-(800) 231-5163.
C. Everett Koop, M.D., and Timothy Johnson, M.D. Let's Talk: An
Honest Conversation on Critical Issues.
Zondervan Press, 1992, 144 pages. Reviewed by William Griffin on page 8
of the November 8, 1992 issue of Catholic Twin Circle. A former
Surgeon General of the United States and ABC-TV's medical editor discuss
the critical issues of abortion, euthanasia, AIDS, and health care. Both
writers are Christians who disagree on some of the issues, and this
book, which is a published version of their informal debates, helps
Christians examine some of the more arcane and complicated aspects of
the above issues.
William H. Masters, M.D, Virginia E. Johnson, and Robert C.
Kolodny, M.D. Crisis: Heterosexual Behavior in the Age of AIDS.
Grove Publishers, 1988. 243 pages. Reviewed by Wayne Lutton on pages
48 and 49 of the May 27, 1988 issue of National Review. The
authors show how the AIDS virus has 'broken out' of its original target
population and is now heavily striking at the heterosexual population
and at drug users. The book ranges over many topics, including the
failure of promiscuous homo- and heterosexuals to resort to 'safe sex'
in significant numbers, the underestimation of AIDS cases by the
government, and the doubtful safety of the nation's blood supply.
Lawrence J. McNamee, M.D. and Brian F. McNamee, M.D. AIDS: The
Nation's First Politically Protected Disease.
La Habra, California: National Medical Legal Publishing House. 1988.
182 pages. Reviewed by Michael D. Collins in the June 1989 Fidelity
Magazine. The authors focus on the social impacts caused when marital
fidelity and monogamy are replaced with bestiality and anal sex. The
politicians have come to see homosexuals as a protected group that
require special privileges that are absolutely immutable and
transcendent of all other person's rights and privileges (rather like
the abortion "right").
David A. Noebel, Wayne C. Lutton, and Paul Cameron. AIDS:
Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.
Summit Ministries Research Center, Manitou Springs, Colorado, 80829.
1985, 149 pages. Reviewed by Chilton Williamson, Jr. on page 58 of the
April 11, 1986 issue of National Review. A review of the
literature that has been written about AIDS, and an examination of the
tactics used by homosexuals to take advantage of the plague to further
their own goals.
Father Enrique T. Rueda and Michael Schwartz. Gays, AIDS, and
You.
130 pages, paperback. 1987. Order from the Devin Adair Company, 143
Sound Beach Avenue, Post Office Box A, Old Greenwich, Connecticut 06870,
or from Our Lady's Book Service, Nazareth Homestead, R.D. 1, Box 258,
Constable, New York 12926, telephone: 1-800-263-8160. The writers
characterize AIDS as a "politically-protected plague," and
show how society has disarmed itself against AIDS. The authors show how
homosexuals are exploiting the virus for sympathy and as a coverup to
pursue their own perverse goals. The homosexual movement refuses to call
for chastity and it rejects any sort of morality, instead fervently
hoping that the government will bail it out with some miracle cure.
Meanwhile, they carelessly and recklessly endanger all of society.
Charles F. Turner, Heather G. Miller, and Lincoln E. Moses
(editors). AIDS: Sexual Behavior and Intravenous Drug Use.
National Research Council, Committee on AIDS Research and the
Behavioral, Social, and Statistical Sciences, Commission on Behavioral
and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, D.C.: National Academy
Press, 1989, 575 pages. More than fifty experts on AIDS contributed to
this massive volume, which covers just about all aspects of the disease,
from behavior to epidemiology to the problems that now obstruct
effective research in this area.
United States Government. Acquired Immune Deficiency and
Chemical Dependency.
A report on a national meeting held in San Francisco in April 1986
on the role of alcohol and other drugs on AIDS. Topics include the
nature of AIDS, chemical dependency and AIDS, alcohol and the immune
system, AIDS and alcoholism, and related topics. Serial Number
017-024-01320-0, 1987, 82 pages. Order by mail from Superintendent of
Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
20402, or by telephone from (202) 783-3238.
United States Government. AIDS: A Public Health Challenge;
State Issues, Policies, and Programs.
Volume 1: Assessing the Problem.
Information on administration and organization, screening and
testing, surveillance, confidentiality, and potential for
discrimination. Serial number 017-024-01339-1, 1987, 322 pages.
Volume 2: Managing and Financing the Problem. Information on
financing care and service programs, medical care, support services,
education, and research. Serial number 017-024-01340-4, 1987, 144 pages.
Volume 3: Resource Guide. Bibliography, terminology, CDC
recommendations and guidelines, education and training centers, and
other related information on AIDS. Serial number 017-024-01341-2, 1987,
132 pages. AIDS and the Education of Our Children. This is the Federal
AIDS pamphlet sent to every household in the country. Serial number
065-000-00333-3, 1988, 34 pages (sold in packages of 25 only).
United States Government. AIDS Bibliography.
A monthly subscription service on the newest articles published
about all aspects of AIDS. Serial Number 717-123-00000-0, monthly. Order
by mail from Superintendent of Documents, United States Government
Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by telephone from (202)
783-3238.
United States Government. Secretary's Work Group on Pediatric
HIV Infection and Disease: Final Report.
Defines the scope of the problem of HIV infection among infants,
children, and adolescents, and provides recommendations for action,
study, research, care, financing, and prevention. Serial Number
017-024-01369-2, 1988, 94 pages. Order by mail from Superintendent of
Documents, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
20402, or by telephone from (202) 783-3238.
© American Life League BBS 1-703-659-7111
This is a chapter of the Pro-Life Activists Encyclopedia published
by American Life League.
|