2000 From: Digestifier To: Subject: Dead-Flames Digest #566 Dead-Flames Digest #566, Volume #48 Thu, 13 Oct 05 07:00:02 PDT Contents: Re: why baseball sucks? (band beyond description) Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans (Brad Greer) Re: why baseball sucks? ("Rogues Island's finest") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans (Brad Greer) Re: JGB 1/26/76 @ Keystone BT (DB) Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans ("Rogues Island's finest") Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? (DB) Re: why baseball sucks? ("Bzl.") Re: hey Volkfolk! (VWBus content) ("volkfolk") Re: hey Volkfolk! (VWBus content) ("Rogues Island's finest") Re: Hard ttimes in NE (Brad Greer) Re: why baseball sucks? ("imsjry") Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans (JimK) Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? (ba ba booie) Hey Brew... ("Rogues Island's finest") Re: your favorite road trip songs? favorite blaster song? ("Ot Bot Kat") Re: 37 years ago tonight... ("pbleers@hotmail.com") ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- r song? ("JohnB") From: band beyond description <123@456.com> Subject: Re: why baseball sucks? Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 22:01:55 +0900 On 2005-10-13 13:35:07 +0900, "Bzl." said: > > "bill c" wrote in message > news:PQk3f.14785$Fc4.10571@twister.nyc.rr.com... >> >> "DG" wrote in message >> news:iplrk1h3lv91mgqqc45ge88m9mgkit7673@4ax.com... >>> Bzl. wrote: >>>> >>>> frndthdevl wrote >>>> >>>>> no replay! >>> >>> >>> Hopefully, they never do... >>> >>> >>>> they wuz robbed fo sure. I wonder if they can protest based on that >> "hard" >>>> strike called by the ump, seemingly signifying the batter was out. > But, >>>> they can't get anywhere on the badness of the call. >>>> >>>> Then again, Scoscia is an ass, so maybe he deserves it. (Cue up pine > tar >>>> incident.) >>> >>> >>> They got away with one against the Yanks. So they should suck it up >>> and try to win the next one... >>> >>> >> >> zoomed in replay on fox showed the ball bounce up into his glove. >> maybe the shortest hop ever but it still hit the ground. >> >> > > bullshit I only saw the telecast live as it happened and the subsequent replays before the game ended, with Rick Sutcliffe saying the Angels were robbed by a flat-out wrong call. Did they really show it later to be hitting the ground? -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ From: Brad Greer Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:05:35 -0400 On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:34:18 -0700, DG wrote: >Brad Greer wrote: >> >>DG wrote: >> >>>wyeknot wrote: >>>> >>>>DG wrote: >>>>> wyeknot wrote: >>>>>>DG wrote: >>>>>>>Rogues Island's finest wrote: >>>>>>>>I stayed up until midnight just to watch them lose. Good job, Arod! >>>>>>>Thankfully, the Yanks outlasted the BoSox. Beat them in a come from >>>>>>>behind division victory. >>>>>> >>>>>>Yeah, their marathon-like stamina is stunning. ### >>>>> >>>>> Imagine that... Sox fans back to their bitchy whiny ways. >>>> >>>>Pointing out dumbass analysis is neither bitchy nor whiny. Both teams >>>>were knocked out in the first round of the playoffs. And the Yankees >>>>looked nearly as bad as the Red Sox as they embraced defeat again. >>> >>> >>>Red Sox got swept. Yankees took it to the final game. Sure the Yanks >>>screwed up but they will reload. >> >>The Yankees massively under-achieved. They had the same >>regular-season record as the Red Sox and finished one game worse than >>the Angels. They have been "re-loading" for the past five years >>without succeeding, given how much money they have tied up in players >>who are not producing (especially their pitching staff) it's hard to >>see how they will be able to re-load effectively. Even Steinbrenner >>has limits to how much he will spend. They appear to be reverting to >>their style in the '80s - get expensive free agents with no real >>thought to how they will perform as a team. > > >They lost a close game 5. No big deal to this Yankee fan. > It certainly seems to be a big deal to Yankee fans here in the New York/New Jersey area. There is a lot of discussion on whether Torre should be fired, how much A-Rod sucked in the playoffs (again), how disappointing Randy Johnson was, how "the Angels didn't really beat us, we beat ourselves", etc. The Yankees are in decline and have been so for the past 5 years. Yes, there version of "decline" is better than most other teams, but declining they are. They have emptied the farm system to a great extent to make mid-season trades and Steinbrenner is allowing the Tampa braintrust to have too much input in the free agent buying decisions instead of relying on the solid baseball people (such as Stick Michaels) who built the dynasty of the late '90s. If you fail to see the parallels to the teams of the '80s it's because you're in denial. ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: why baseball sucks? Date: 13 Oct 2005 06:07:07 -0700 DG wrote: > Neil X. wrote: > > > >> bill c wrote: > >> > >> zoomed in replay on fox showed the ball bounce up into his glove. > >> maybe the shortest hop ever but it still hit the ground. > > > > > >Yep, that's what it looked like to me. > > > >And if you don't agree, remember, then you are agreeing with Tim > >McCarver. 'Nuff said. > > > I'm still scratching my head over a McCarver comment during the > Yanks/Angels game when the Angels had a guy on and McCarver talked > about how the Yanks waste time holding runners on. Does he realize > it's playoff baseball? Does he know how you win a game? > > How much did he have to drink? Hell, we're still scratching our head around here over a McCarverism from last years ALCS after a walk: "That walk was the same as a home run!" Say what? The orange hair dye done seeped into that dudes skull. Mark ------------------------------ From: Brad Greer Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:10:00 -0400 On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:37:56 -0700, DG wrote: >Brad Greer wrote: >> >>DG wrote: >>>He's done just fine. Sure the last ring was 2000 but that doesn't >>>matter. They are the cream of the crop every year. >>> >>No, they aren't. The cream of the crop is the team that wins the >>World Series by definition. So, the Yankees haven't been the cream of >>the crop since 2000. Unless you have some other definition of what is >>the best team in baseball. > > >The regular season shows who is the best. The post season shows who >is the hottest at the moment. Then the Atlanta Braves are truly the cream of the crop, right? After all, they've won more consecutive division titles than the Yankees. At minimum, they should be mentioned in the same breath as equals to the Yankees by your standards. The baseball season is a long grind, and you can be fairly confident that the teams that make the playoffs are among the best teams in baseball (San Diego Padres excepted, the NL West was way too weak this year). However, to be the best team in baseball you have to prove it in the post season as well. Or are you going to concede that the 26 World Series won by the Yankees aren't a sign of the historical greatness of the organization, just a result of them being the hottest team at the moment? >Do they need to win it all every year for you? >Not for me... > >Over four million tickets were sold for Yankees games. More people >see them than any other team because of their lineup. > How many people attend Yankee games has nothing to do with whether they are the best team in baseball or not. The Chicago Cubs always get a lot of fans as well (maybe not 4 million, but still a hell of a lot). The Yankee lineup and reputation contri 2000 bute a lot to the number of fans they draw, but they don't give out awards for "most fans seeing your team in a season." ------------------------------ From: DB Subject: Re: JGB 1/26/76 @ Keystone BT Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:08:10 -0400 Sean Baker wrote: > This looks real good .... > > http://bt.etree.org/details.php?id=18825 > > Peace, > > Sean > Yes, it is real good, but the date is actually 1/27/76. The first set rocks (for '76 JGB that is). I just listened to it this morning. DB Here is the rundown: Jerry Garcia Band Keystone Berkeley, CA 1/27/76 MSR (2 track 7" reels @ 15ips) > cassette (TDK SA-X100) > NAK-CR-7a playback > Lucid AD9624 24-bit A/D > Fostex D5 master DAT > Sony CDR-W33 master CD > EAC > SHN (non- seekable) > patching using Sound Forge Studio 6.0 > sector boundary verification using shntool > .shn encoding (seekable) using mkwACT. A > CD by Ryan Shriver, original .shn by Kevin Tobin, patching and re-.shn by Joe Jupille (jjoops AT attbi DOT com). Disc One (7) 67:17 --Set I-- 01. Catfish John [12:28] [0:19] 02. Tore Up Over You [7:34] [0:27] 03. Tough Mama [7:58] [0:07] 04. Who Was John [9:16] [0:07] 05. Mission in the Rain [5:55] [0:08] 06. How Sweet It Is [7:36] [0:21] --Set II-- 07. The Harder They Come [14:55] [0:03] Disc Two (7) 68:00 --Set II (con't)-- 01. Knockin' on Hogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: Steve McHenry Sighting Date: 13 Oct 2005 05:13:51 -0700 Steve Lenier wrote: > I swear...I was just cruising along RMGD in my padded office chair, and > suddenly BOOM, not one, but TWO posts from Steve McH... Yeah, it is good to see him back, the nut that he is. Mark ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: Hard ttimes in NE Date: 13 Oct 2005 05:35:22 -0700 Neil X. wrote: > > Rogues Island's finest wrote: > > > > the 'Bolts belong at or near the top of > > that list, and the Steelers belong one notch below the Patriots > > ,wherever they happen to be on the list. > > > > That's right on both counts. The Patriots, Chargers and Steelers have > all played each other, and are all 1-1 against each other. After > watching all three games, in my opinion, the rankng of those thre teams > right now is: > > 1) Chargers > 2) Patriots > 3) Steelers > > I am, of course, hopeful that by the time the playoffs roll around > positions 1 and 2 will be reversed. > > Oh, and in the AFC, the Indy Foals are #4, FWIW. Don't worry about > them, they're the Atlanta Braves of the NFL...... I don't know how you can say that, Indy now has the most awesomeest defense since the '86 Bears! Let's see, they've shut down the high powered offense of Baltimore, Jacksonville, San Fran, Tennessee, and Cleveland!! Mark ------------------------------ From: "Dylanstubs" Subject: Re: why no JGB on archive.org Date: 13 Oct 2005 05:38:13 -0700 > gb wrote: > does anyone know why there is no Jerry Band on Archive.org? Or is it there > and I'm just blind? Deborah Kuntz not into giving Jerry away. Gotta sell them Pure Jerrys! ------------------------------ From: band beyond description <123@456.com> Subject: Re: New Monsoon played at my cousin's wedding Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 21:49:39 +0900 > Hi Randy! As far as name bands playing at weddings, Brave Combo played at our friends' wedding in Dallas several years ago....that was cool for everyone concerned. -- Peace, Steve ------------------------------ From: "JohnB" Crossposted-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films,rec.music.dylan,rec.music.beatles,rec.music.classical Subject: Re: your favorite road trip songs? favorite blaster song? Date: 13 Oct 2005 05:59:07 -0700 jesskidden@yahoo.com wrote: > JohnB wrote: > > mook, what's a mook? wrote: > > > >>when you start out on long road trip, what song do you like to blast > >>off with? > >> > > > > > > Hocus Pocus - Focus > > ////shutter\\\\ Please stop the car and let me out here- I'll walk the > rest of the way.... The fresh air will do you good. ------------------------------ only send the nutters to the UK? > > We give you Lennon, you give us Shelby & God-boy! > (Please forgive us for sending Graham Nash). > > Ross > > That reminds me, whatever happened to that other British export -- Dickie Peppercock? DB ------------------------------ From: "Bzl." Subject: Re: why baseball sucks? Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:25:52 -0400 "band beyond description" <123@456.com> wrote in message news:3r7463Fi624dU2@individual.net... > On 2005-10-13 13:35:07 +0900, "Bzl." said: > > > > > "bill c" wrote in message > > news:PQk3f.14785$Fc4.10571@twister.nyc.rr.com... > >> > >> "DG" wrote in message > >> news:iplrk1h3lv91mgqqc45ge88m9mgkit7673@4ax.com... > >>> Bzl. wrote: > >>>> > >>>> frndthdevl wrote > >>>> > >>>>> no replay! > >>> > >>> > >>> Hopefully, they never do... > >>> > >>> > >>>> they wuz robbed fo sure. I wonder if they can protest based on that > >> "hard" > >>>> strike called by the ump, seemingly signifying the batter was out. > > But, > >>>> they can't get anywhere on the badness of the call. > >>>> > >>>> Then again, Scoscia is an ass, so maybe he deserves it. (Cue up pine > > tar > >>>> incident.) > >>> > >>> > >>> They got away with one against the Yanks. So they should suck it up > >>> and try to win the next one... > >>> > >>> > >> > >> zoomed in replay on fox showed the ball bounce up into his glove. > >> maybe the shortest hop ever but it still hit the ground. > >> > >> > > > > bullshit > > I only saw the telecast live as it happened and the subsequent replays > before the game ended, with Rick Sutcliffe saying the Angels were > robbed by a flat-out wrong call. Did they really show it later to be > hitting the ground? > -- > Peace, > Steve > No, just Chicagoans' wishful thinking. ------------------------------ From: "volkfolk" Subject: Re: hey Volkfolk! (VWBus content) Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:25:13 -0400 "Steve Lenier" wrote in message news:BF72FCDC.3292B%slenier@comcast.net... > Our 15-year-old Mike just expressed interest in perhaps getting a VW bus > when it becomes time for him to get a vehicle...about how much would it > cost > for him to get the kind of VW bus you might recommend for a kid of such > age? > Figure dependable, but not beautiful. And then about how much would it > cost > him to run, in insurance (probably widely varioable), gas, and > maintenance? > Just very basic numbers please. And if it's too much hassle, no problem :) > That is a loaded question. One possible answer is "if you have to ask, you can't afford it" :^) Busses are becoming a slightly endangered species, however if you are willing to get your fingernails dirty, they can still be affordable vehicles. Being in So Cal you should be able to find a pretty decent one with out too much difficulty I don't know what California Insurance laws are like, but gas should be reasonably affordable (20-25 mpg depending on how hard you drive, and what you have for a motor) A good place to start looking is one of these websites http://www.limbobus.org/ Lots of links and general knowledge on this site. I belong to this club and it has lots of helpful and friendly members http://www.thesamba.com/vw/ The best VW classified site on the web IMO Good luck and let me know if you need any more advice Scot ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Re: hey Volkfolk! (VWBus content) Date: 13 Oct 2005 06:30:57 -0700 Steve Lenier wrote: > Our 15-year-old Mike just expressed interest in perhaps getting a VW bus > when it becomes time for him to get a vehicle...about how much would it cost > for him 2000 to get the kind of VW bus you might recommend for a kid of such age? > Figure dependable, but not beautiful. And then about how much would it cost > him to run, in insurance (probably widely varioable), gas, and maintenance? > Just very basic numbers please. And if it's too much hassle, no problem :) Steve, at the risk of being the poopy old Dad guy: is a VW bus really a good vehicle, safety wise, for a 16 year old boy? Just askin...maybe the answer is that it can't go fast enough for anyone to get hurt.... Mark...who drove a VW bus (my girlfriends parents vehicle) many, many places in the mid '70s, "do as I say, not as I did...." ------------------------------ From: Brad Greer Subject: Re: Hard ttimes in NE Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:36:04 -0400 On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 13:04:28 -0700, "Andrew Murawa" wrote: >"Rogues Island's finest" wrote in message >news:1129145271.410957.197060@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com... >> >> Andrew Murawa wrote: >>> "Neil X." wrote in message >>> news:1129090446.955419.168030@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com... >>> > >>> >> Andrew Murawa wrote: >>> >> >>> >> Don't start whining about a few injuries now after >>> >> having been left relatively unscathed during the past two >>> >> seasons... >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Damn man, last year we lost our 5-time All-Pro cornerback Ty Law. >>> > We >>> > also played more than half the season without Super Bowl MVP Deion >>> > Branch and All-Pro tackle Matt Light. We lost All-Pro defensive >>> > tackle >>> > Richard Seymour for both AFC playoff games. The year before, we >>> > lost >>> > All-Pro linebackers Rosevelt Colvin and Ted Johnson. Don't get me >>> > started. Was anyone else in the league forced to play wide >>> > receivers >>> > in their defensive secondary last year?? >>> >>> Wow, so you lost one guy for the season, a couple guys for half the >>> season, and another guy for two games, and you had injury problems? >>> Talk >>> to the Panthers or the Titans, each of whom had at least half of >>> their >>> starters lost to season-ending injuries... Injuries are a part of >>> the >>> game, certainly, but by and large, the Pats escaped major injury >>> problems each of the last two seasons... >> >> Holy shit, you weren't kidding! Let me put it this way: you have >> *got* >> be fucking kidding! Neil listed only the high(low)lites, the Patriots >> had HUGE injury issues, on par or more so than anyone but Carolina. >> They had so many guys missing from the defensive backfield that they >> played a wide receiver at DB. And they went 14-2. And won the title. >> >> In 2003, the Patriots started 45, yes, that's 45! different players. >> And went 14-2 and won the title. That has to be some kind of record. > >Just going over the history of the 2003 team, they lost exactly three >players for the season due to injury, Roosevelt Colvin, David Patten and >Mike Compton... Other players on the team, such as Kevin Faulk, >McGinest, Branch, Givens, Graham and others were listed as questionable >for most of the season, but rarely actually missed games, and by the end >of the season, had most of their starters intact... Given that they >started three different guys at RB, six at WR, three at punter, etc, the ># of different "starters" on a team that prides itself on having >interchangeable players is a nice number, but doesn't mean a whole lot, >compared with say the Panthers last year who lost something like 13 >players for the season to injury, including 4 pro-bowlers, or the Titans >who by the end of last season had 14 missing starters... > >Who'd you lose last year? Poole, Law, Samuel, Branch and Watson? It's >pretty impressive that the Pats were able to overcome those injuries, >but it wasn't exactly a barrage of injuries last season, let alone the >year before > Andrew - you're doing some fuzzy math here. In your first paragraph you say the Patriots lost 3 players for the season to injury (Colvin, Patten and Compton) and then in your second paragraph you mention losing Poole, Law, Samuael, Branch and Watson. That sounds like 8 players named as lost to me, and Poole and Law were lost for the season (regardless of whether they were put on IR or not) meaning they lost their starting cornerbacks. The Patriots probably do get too much credit for their irreplacable player strategy, although having a wide receive play nickel back is pretty damn impressive, but they do have a deep organization with a strong emphasis on team over the individual. They are the model of how to build a team in the salary cap era, although if they lost Brady for any significant amount of time I think they'd be screwed. ------------------------------ From: "imsjry" Subject: Re: why baseball sucks? Date: 13 Oct 2005 06:37:48 -0700 Bzl. wrote: > > I only saw the telecast live as it happened and the subsequent replays > > before the game ended, with Rick Sutcliffe saying the Angels were > > robbed by a flat-out wrong call. Did they really show it later to be > > hitting the ground? > > -- > > Peace, > > Steve > > > > No, just Chicagoans' wishful thinking. Not wishful thinking. Sox win!! ------------------------------ From: JimK Subject: Re: (NDC) Attention Yankee fans Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:44:16 -0400 Reply-To: jkezwind@comcast.net On Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:05:35 -0400, Brad Greer wrote: >On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 20:34:18 -0700, DG wrote: > >>Brad Greer wrote: >>> >>>DG wrote: >>> >>>>wyeknot wrote: >>>>> >>>>>DG wrote: >>>>>> wyeknot wrote: >>>>>>>DG wrote: >>>>>>>>Rogues Island's finest wrote: >>>>>>>>>I stayed up until midnight just to watch them lose. Good job, Arod! >>>>>>>>Thankfully, the Yanks outlasted the BoSox. Beat them in a come from >>>>>>>>behind division victory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Yeah, their marathon-like stamina is stunning. ### >>>>>> >>>>>> Imagine that... Sox fans back to their bitchy whiny ways. >>>>> >>>>>Pointing out dumbass analysis is neither bitchy nor whiny. Both teams >>>>>were knocked out in the first round of the playoffs. And the Yankees >>>>>looked nearly as bad as the Red Sox as they embraced defeat again. >>>> >>>> >>>>Red Sox got swept. Yankees took it to the final game. Sure the Yanks >>>>screwed up but they will reload. >>> >>>The Yankees massively under-achieved. They had the same >>>regular-season record as the Red Sox and finished one game worse than >>>the Angels. They have been "re-loading" for the past five years >>>without succeeding, given how much money they have tied up in players >>>who are not producing (especially their pitching staff) it's hard to >>>see how they will be able to re-load effectively. Even Steinbrenner >>>has limits to how much he will spend. They appear to be reverting to >>>their style in the '80s - get expensive free agents with no real >>>thought to how they will perform as a team. >> >> >>They lost a close game 5. No big deal to this Yankee fan. >> >It certainly seems to be a big deal to Yankee fans here in the New >York/New Jersey area. There is a lot of discussion on whether Torre >should be fired, how much A-Rod sucked in the playoffs (again), how >disappointing Randy Johnson was, how "the Angels didn't really beat >us, we beat ourselves", etc. The Yankees are in decline and have been >so for the past 5 years. Yes, there version of "decline" is better >than most other teams, but declining they are. They have emptied the >farm system to a great extent to make mid-season trades and >Steinbrenner is allowing the Tampa braintrust to have too much input >in the free agent buying decisions instead of relying on the solid >baseball people (such as Stick Michaels) who built the dynasty of the >late '90s. If you fail to see the parallels to the teams of the '80s >it's because you're in denial. All of the above is pretty much t 1554 rue, but the decline and emptying of the farm system, was something that was almost inevitable when you finish at the top for a decade. Although the draft in baseball doesn't have the immediate impact it does in sports like basketball and football, it's become much more important than it was twenty to thirty years ago. It's difficult to keep the farm system stocked with quality players when you're drafting at the bottom year after year. In addition, when you're in contention every year, you're in a position where you're pretty much forced to trade off some of your young talent in mid-season to acquire veterans who will be more useful in a pennant race. And if you look at the young players the Yanks have let go during the last ten years, you'd be hard pressed to find many who have become regulars in the majors, much less stars. Another factor that's often overlooked when people talk about the Yankee payroll is that winning inflates salaries. Look at what happens repeatedly in the NFL these days. Players on teams that win championships command higher salaries when they become free agents, based not just on their individual performance but also that of the team. If you want to keep your team together you have to overpay or let them go to stay under the cap. In baseball, where there is no cap, you overpay if you have the money to do it. The Yanks have the money. What you end up with is a $200 million payroll with players who, individually, are worth much less. JimK ------------------------------ From: Jazare@webtv.net (ba ba booie) Subject: Re: who on rmgd would you like to meet? Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 09:35:23 -0400 who on rmgd would you like to meet? GregSasso@gmail.com (Greg=A0Sasso) wrote: No one in particular, I guess, but I always enjoy meeting other people into the same music. bbb wrote: I feel the same way. There is nobody to single out. booie loves you all. ; ) I have met a handful of people on this newsgroup, and if they are any indication on as to who else hangs on this newsgroup then you are *all* alright. booie getting a little choked up.... ***but I always enjoy meeting other people into the same music.*** Or to meet someone who is willing to open their minds, or even to try opening their minds. That is where you can tell the character of a person. I mean if they aren't even willing to give something a listen to, then you know right from the start where the conversation is going. It's when, some gives a chance to listen to something, that is when you can tell if you want to meet or hang with them. This group is getting better & better with age. I like that. Some newsgroups are withering away, but this seems to keep gelling into new shapes all the time. That is what keeps me coming back. booie........... .. .. .. Have you checked these sites out today? http://www.jambase.com http://www.jambands.com http://www.jambase.com/festivals .. Find out where your favorite band is playing. Pollstar (the concert hotwire) http://pollstar.com ------------------------------ From: "Rogues Island's finest" Subject: Hey Brew... Date: 13 Oct 2005 06:45:26 -0700 Did you happen to hear some outdoor Cheese from your window the other night? Apparently they had a fire alarm at the State and they broke into an impromptu acoustic set on the street, short video at this site: http://www.livecheese.com/ Pretty cool. Mark ------------------------------ From: "Ot Bot Kat" Crossposted-To: rec.arts.movies.current-films,rec.music.dylan,rec.music.beatles,rec.music.classical Subject: Re: your favorite road trip songs? favorite blaster song? Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 15:46:36 +0200 everybody 's got something to hide except me and my platypus "JohnB" schreef in bericht news:1129208347.492003.311880@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com... > > jesskidden@yahoo.com wrote: >> JohnB wrote: >> > mook, what's a mook? wrote: >> > >> >>when you start out on long road trip, what song do you like to blast >> >>off with? >> >> >> > >> > >> > Hocus Pocus - Focus >> >> ////shutter\\\\ Please stop the car and let me out here- I'll walk the >> rest of the way.... > > The fresh air will do you good. > ------------------------------ From: "pbleers@hotmail.com" Subject: Re: 37 years ago tonight... Date: 13 Oct 2005 06:48:39 -0700 I dig that scraping noise thing they were doing........it scoots back and forth between the left and right channels, causing my head to get a little loopy. I'm easily amused. ------------------------------ ** FOR YOUR REFERENCE ** The service addresses, to which questions about the list itself and requests to be added to or deleted from it should be directed, are as follows: Internet: dead-flames-request@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames-request%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames-request You can send mail to the entire list (and rec.music.gdead) via one of these addresses: Internet: dead-flames@gdead.berkeley.edu Bitnet: dead-flames%gdead.berkeley.edu@ucbcmsa Uucp: ...!{ucbvax,uunet}!gdead.berkeley.edu!dead-flames End of Dead-Flames Digest ****************************** . 0