SUBJECT: MORE FROM CFNACCS FILE: UFO3190 ** This letter was forwarded to me via modem by Dan Smith on behalf of Rosemary Ellen Guiley. It appears to be critical of PSI TECH's *report* on Remote Viewing activities of Crop Circles. =========================================================================== April 8, 1993 PSI TECH Rosemary Ellen Guiley, Director Center for North American Crop Circle Studies P.O. Box 1712 New Canaan, CT 06840-1712 Dear Ms. Guiley, I received your package the other day enclosing the PSI TECH, ENIGMA PENETRATION; CROP CIRCLES, FINAL PROJECT REPORT. My initial interest for viewing this particular piece was in comparing any data found on the Barbary Castle formation from the remote viewing to known mathematical and geometric findings by various researchers involved in the studies of the Crop Circles. As per our conversation, we agreed that I would write a paper airing any personal comments. This I have done. I regret that it is not relating any comparative analysis in the sense of mathematical interpretation. I found no intelligible or inspiring content contained within the report. In this paper, I am dealing with specific details that seem to me to be manipulative and extremely misleading to the general public. I am not usually in the field of politics, but there is no way I will personally let this paper be circulated without critical review. I understand that the PSI TECH group is a corporation which employs people whom they have trained for a fee to enhance their psychic capabilities in remote viewing. They then hire out their services for other organizations and individuals seeking information which by any other means may not be obtainable. Without further background on these viewers and the organization they are employed by, data on previous cases of incidence, and reports of their percentage of accuracy, I find it very difficult to fully accept this report. There are questions that need to be answered concerning personal belief systems, educational background, and motive behind both the corporation and the employed individuals, e.g., The Jury is chosen for lack of opinion and ignorance of the case...etc....I would think it would be very difficult to have a pure and innocent opinion on Crop Circles or any other topic whereby so much information has already been highly published and aired on our television networks. In regards to the FINAL REPORT, I would like to express some thoughts. First on KEY ASSESSMENTS. STATEMENT #1: "Crop Circles are purposefully created by a collection of alien races who appear to be capable of time travel. The pictographs serve primarily as reference markings and for 'event line' orientation." It is obvious that crop circles are purposefully created, possibly by alien races, (spirits, Earth energies, etc.). In what respect do the remote viewers mean 'time travel'? If Crop Circles are reference markings for 'event line' orientation, orientation to what event? It should be obvious to society by just having the Crop Circle phenomena in our fields, that these are events marking time by the given dates of the individual formations. As far as aliens using Crop Circles as events marking time, primitive man had the capability of using the stars and planetary alignments as 'event line' markers. As my friend put it,"For the aliens to use Crop Circles as event line markers is as outrageous as the Commander of the Lunar Module tossing red paint out of its hull to mark and track its fly-by orbit!" STATEMENT #2: "The pictographs are deliberately embedded in a short-lived, perishable medium." Of course the formations are deliberately embedded in vegetation, unless the Circle Makers keep egregiously erring and getting their coordinates confused in an attempt to shoot for some sand illustrations in the Gobi Desert. Not so obviously 'short-lived' as the crops are self-regenerating by seed. There is still insufficient research available with enough duration of time to see the long-term effects on future generations of affected crop seeds and their soil. Perishable, yes, but withstanding human 'event line' memory. STATEMENT #3: "Production of the circles occurs via two primary mechanisms: Macroscale: external area effects, heat, and overpressure; Microscale: internal plant stem effects; pressure changes, and cellular damage." Yes, it's true. To produce an effect you must have the ability to create a mechanism facilitating an event to occur. The technology behind the mechanism is what is in question. We can see the effect of the cause. This statement lacks substance. I will now refer to the rest of the report following the Key Assessments. Page 2: "Crop Circles are not symbols intended as a 'message to man.' These deliberately created pictographs are signposts, or reference marks produced by Aliens moving in space and time (back and forth/in and out), who are monitoring the course of event trajectories, (in a state space analysis sense), on Earth." That is a pretty hard statement and reminiscent of the cover story of Doug and Dave being responsible for the formations, so gee, we might as well forget about the circles. Over and over we hear statements from particular agencies alluding to the belief that these formations are just a hoax or have no value. Curious....Man's domicile is planet Earth. The majority of Man's existence stems from life giving-properties derived from our food crops. If Aliens are recording event trajectories (in a state/space analysis sense) on Man's Earth and marking on Man's fields, I would suspect that Man would be involved because these markings are attracting Man's attention. Deliberate attention, not covert. When deliberate attention is demonstrated, intention is a prerequisite. The above statement is contradicted on the following page 3, second paragraph, which reads, "Strongly associated with these observing missions are indications that an intelligent agency is/has been intervening in HUMAN AFFAIRS at critical junctures--certain key historic events indeed seem to have been manipulated. This agenda is attached to the overriding idea of 'building a metaphoric structure, the foundation of which spans the time continuum'-- rather than with the idea of 'engineering' a set condition, conditions, 'up ahead', in a linear time sense. [Editor's Note: It was not determined whether the agencies responsible for producing the circles are themselves involved in this intervention, or are acting merely as observers/recorders]. Even the Editor's note does not excuse this contradiction. Intervention, observations, and recording of human affairs are still, or should be, of Man's concern. So we better not forget about the formations. There are agencies out there trying to have us believe the formations are not intended for Man. But after all the obvious attempts to attract Man, I find it easier to digest the fact that these formations ARE intended for Man, and NOT vice versa. Page 2, paragraph 2. "At least twelve different species of extraterrestrials, all from different points of origin, use and recognize these unique "signatures." A great deal of importance is attached to the pictographs by the visitors, whose vehicles often change direction after a circle flyby. Some crafts halt in the vicinity of the circles for what appear to be communication checks. On occasion, craft temporarily stop and conduct exploratory probing/testing in the vicinity of the circles. If twelve species of E.T.s are using these unique signatures, and conducting probing/testing in the vicinity of the circles, then that is at least a dozen of E.T.s who are interested in Man's domain. But again, what are they probing/testing? This paragraph lacks comprehensive value. Page 2, paragraph 3. "The deliberately selected circle medium, (grasslands), is one which guarantees perishability; the circles are ephemeral by design. Additionally, the transitory nature of the pictographs is also connected with the idea that more permanent marks on Earth would tend to attract man's attention to fixed, specific locations. This is not the "game plan" of these visitors, who are attempting to maintain a covert presence, as much as operationally possible." The grasslands are mentioned as guaranteeing perishability. That guarantee is invalid, even "ephemeral by design" is discredited. Aerial surveillance and photographs taken of fields have exhibited ghost imaging of formations from the previous year. These ghost images are visible because of the variation of color in the vegetation which occurred the following year after a formation the previous year. Analysis of the crops has not yet yielded enough information to explain the anomaly, but the fact remains that some formations have left a legacy whereby canceling out the guarantee that they are ephemeral by design. Couple this with human psyche and memory, along with all the recorded data, and the formations appear to be becoming more permanent in time within the various modes. As for a covert presence, the E.T.s sure blew their cover if they didn't want to attract man's attention, especially at a specific site, e.g., STONEHENGE, AVEBURY, SILBURY HILL, etc.. I guess we would have to question the intelligence of these super spies if these actions are as good as "operationally possible." Page 2 , paragraph 4. "Although the blueprint for each circle is mapped out ahead of time, allowance is made for "fortuitous aesthetic occurrences--the idea grows with the doing." For each mark, the creation date, (in a celestial time standard), geographical location, and geometry are recorded in a central registry. Blueprints are specifications depicting a structure or an event. If they are mapped out ahead of time it seems to me they would be specific. Fortuitous is defined as happening by chance, accidental. So this statement in analog reads, "Well guys, we are going to make a law saying we can break all laws depending on our needs whereby no law is actually governing!" And yes, it is obvious that the formations have become more elaborate through time. Page 2, paragraph 5. "Anecdotally, it was noted that the circles have given rise historically to various beliefs connected with the supernatural. For instance, the circles inspired the idea of the 'elves' "green rings." The Nazca lines and, most noteworthy, Navajo sand paintings, were ideas born of attempts to copy the "marks of the Gods," so as to evoke a visitation or response." Gosh, humorously now, I guess one would associate the formations with the supernatural (para-normal). Formations should at least be classified outside known normal natural experiences. What came first--the chicken or the egg? Marks OF the Gods, or marks TO the Gods..............I think the E.T.s and Man are both looking for response. Page 3, paragraph 1 . "Alien production of the circles has been concentrated primarily in geographic "belts" which serve as benchmark regions for global-cultural change. One or more pictographs are made to record the presence of each particular observing agency during its excursions among/within what appear to be multiple/alternate/alternative event pathways connected with Earth's history/histories. There are many more visitors in this era (our present) than in other recorded era." I guess we are talking about specific locations again, the central registry, and all the different 'clubs' leaving their insignias. But the E.T.s are intervening with human affairs. I guess they have different opinions on how they want to manipulate for the final outcome and what the final outcome should eventually be for Man's past, present, and future. It's as though Man is in the middle of a big corporate decision, yet he has no vote!!!!! The rest of the report tries to deal with details on the technologies about how the formations are produced, effects on crops, and lights that have been "remotely observed" through psychics. Well, we already have observed and captured on video, along with still photography, light anomalies and supernatural occurrences. We even have recorded on audio tape various sound anomalies associated with the circles. You see, we have accomplished this by 'out-smarting' the E.T.'s covert operations manager. HA! And without the need for high-cost remote viewing corporations. If these circles are not intended for man and these E.T.s are trying to be covert, THEY BLEW IT! However, I feel this is highly unlikely. I tend to question more the motive and agenda behind this report and the people responsible for making it a reality. Why is it even being circulated? It has no scientific substance or content, no promising benefits, and no ethical value. It reads like a low budget sci-fi paperback. This is only my personal opinion. If people are truly interested in the Crop Circle formations, I suggest they read articles and books published by credible researchers on the subject who have spent their own money and time, deriving information directly from within the formations themselves.I encourage everyone to re-evaluate this body of work, PSI TECH, ENIGMA PENETRATION: CROP CIRCLES, FINAL PROJECT REPORT. Colette M. Dowell ** End ** ********************************************************************* * -------->>> THE U.F.O. BBS - http://www.ufobbs.com/ufo <<<------- * *********************************************************************