------------------ Chloroquine etc. 27th of March 2020 ------------------ How one's reputation can be shattered for just one action? That's what could happen to Didier Raoult. He is presented as one of the top 10 virologists of the world. He is supposed to be behind numerous discoveries (although people easily forget that these discoveries are not necessarily Raoult's, but may belong to one of his doctoral students, post-docs etc.). A few days ago, he authored a publication [1] that he presented as a conclusive study of chloroquine in COVID-19, whereas it should have been presented only as a case report. Then the methodology was so wrong, that nothing could be retained from it. He even went as far as retiring from his paper all the cases that worsened during their treatment and needed to be transferred to the ICU. If you remove from a drug trial all the patients who did not respond and you keep all those who showed an improvement of their disease, you can easily give the impression that an ineffective drug is working efficiently. He says that the chinese trials showed an efficacy of chloroquine. Well the only publication I was able to find at this date [2] is a little difficult to read (it's written in mandarin), but the summary is in english and the authors show that there is no difference between chloroquine treated patients vs the control group. He is typical of a French disease: the expert's STAR system. Once you get this status of STAR in your field, everyone will listen to you, and no one will dare contradict you. This is something I've never seen in any other country. The irony is that maybe chloroquine will be the treatment of choice for COVID-19, but if it happens, it will be due to the international collaborative studies of a number of anonymous physicians. And then, the STAR will come telling: "I knew it!". [1]: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105949 [2]: http://www.zjujournals.com/med/EN/10.3785/j.issn.1008-9292.2020.03.03