Well, there's at least somewhat of a biological basis for expressing one's feelings alongside one's thinking:* The amygdala ->prefrontal cortex circuit from the thalamus. It seems that the data stream (if one wants to use a computer-science analogy; it could easily be colored water in hoses) - goes from the thalamus and breaks up into two parallel streams, one for the prefrontal cortex and one for the amygdala. But the stream to the prefrontal cortex is slow and thin but the hose going to the amygdala is fat and fast; like a firehose. But then the amygdala feeds forward into the prefrontal cortex as well, with the force of a fireman's hose, influencing rational thought before rational thought even begins. that being said - the prefrontal cortex ALSO has a stream that feeds BACK into the amygdala, allowing one to utilize rational thought to inhibit or mitigate the power of the amygdala. But it's thin and slow and not a strong connection at first.* It can be built up through training (apparently), explaining the strength of many philosohpies/schools of thought/religions that have us "master our emotions". Yet, how much training does it take for your emotional to take over our rational thinking processes?* None, it seems! Emotion always influences reason [unless one has a damaged amygdala... ppl like that are in a perpetual state of reasoning... never able to commit to a decision because there's no emotional "push" to decide "true"/"false"/"best"/"worst"... must truly be a hell-on-earth.. .at least for those around them with functioning amygdalas]. So, in that sense, not that it's a requirement to pair up emotion and rational thought, it does make some biological sense.* At least, if one believes the whole circuitry notion of brain function anyhow.* We're still seeing what we want to see, after all, so that our scientific hypothesis and discoveries end up happening to match up to common patterns of existing human thought, it shouldn't be surprising. We've been primed to already :P