* The measuring tools we use are enhancements and refinements
       to our own natural systems. A computer that measures and
       sees, measures and sees in the ways that a human can measure
       and see. The conceptions that are possible for a computer
       are limited by its programming and technical abilities, as
       are we.

       So the reality being measured is the reality that is true
       for our use. Rumsfelds "Unknown unknowns" comes into play
       here (amazing that he has the best formulation of the
       concept, put concisely enough to stick him straight into the
       philosophy department from a press conference -but it
       works).

       So naturally a computer that we create,will have
       measurements that match up with other human measurements,
       and consistently with the measurements of other humans
       because it was made by us, for us, and thinks somewhat like
       us. It's our creation, programmed by our thought processes
       and assumptions.
       [1]1 hr * [2]Like * [3]1
     * [4][IMG]
       [5]Kenneth Udut In short, the computer agrees with humans
       because it must.
       It has been programmed with all of our assumptions built-in.
       Wonderful tool, still forever limited, even if it gained
       consciousness.
       At its best, it would only be capable of what the best or
       worst of humanity would be capable of doing or conceiving
       because, even self-programming machines are limited by the
       assumptions of the initial programmers



References

   Visible links
   1. https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/permalink/634575706664230/?comment_id=635215216600279&offset=50&total_comments=158
   2. Like this comment
	https://www.facebook.com/groups/neoacademiaannex/permalink/634575706664230/#
   3. https://www.facebook.com/browse/likes?id=635215216600279
   4. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi
   5. https://www.facebook.com/kenneth.udut?fref=ufi